White People Deserve Reparations

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on July 25, 2021 by andelino
Galley Slaves of the Barbary Corsairs (colored litho); colored lithograph; Private Collection; Peter Newark Historical Pictures; out of copyright

The idea that the descendants of slaves are owed reparations is based on the notion that white people owe black people money today because dead white people mistreated dead black people long ago. On this score alone, this is a racist proposal, the victims of whom are white.

Why should those who did not suffer the indignity of slavery be awarded financial compensation? And why should those who had nothing to do with it be forced to pony up? But if this crazed idea is to be taken seriously, then white people are also deserving of reparations. Who should pay? Muslims.

Economist Thomas Sowell recalls that it was Adam Smith, author of “The Wealth of Nations,” who observed in 1776 that Western Europe was the only place in the world where slavery did not exist. Sowell further notes that nowhere in the world was slavery a controversial issue prior to the 18th century. It wasn’t controversial in Africa or Asia or the Middle East—they were accustomed to slavery. No, it was in Western Europe and the newly created United States where objections were first registered.

It seems odd, then, that the nations which ended slavery are the ones being tapped for reparations. Yet that is exactly what the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, wants. She recently said that those nations that “engaged in or profited from enslavement, the transatlantic trade in enslaved Africans, and colonialism—as well as those who continue to profit from this legacy,” should pay reparations.

Bachelet, like so many other elites around the world, never addresses the need for reparations to white people. They need to do so.

Charles Sumner was an 18th century American politician, and one of America’s most famous abolitionists. He not only condemned black slavery, he condemned white slavery. Indeed, he wrote a book about it, “White Slavery in the Barbary States,” published in 1853.

Sumner detailed how Muslim pirates from North Africa, called corsairs, “became the scourge of Christendom, while their much-dreaded system of slavery assumed a front of new terrors. Their ravages were not confined to the Mediterranean.” In fact, they extended to “the chalky cliffs of England, and even from the distant western coasts of Ireland,” forcing the inhabitants into “cruel captivity.”

The most authoritative work on this subject can be found in Robert Davis’ book, “Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800.” The Ohio State University professor of history estimates that “between 1530 and 1780 there was almost certainly 1 million and quite possibly as many as 1.25 million white, European Christians enslaved by the Muslims of the Barbary Coast.”

How did the Muslim slave masters manage to capture these white people? The Barbary pirates trolled the Mediterranean looking for ships to raid, taking their cargo and enslaving those on board. They also showed up at coastal towns of Italy, Spain, France, England, Ireland, and the Netherlands.

“While the Barbary corsairs looted the cargo of ships they captured,” writes Davis, “their primary goal was to capture non-Muslim people for sale as slaves or for ransom.” Meaning that the pirates were out to enslave white people. It should be noted that they treated their slaves just as harshly as white slave masters in America treated their slaves. “As far as daily living conditions,” he says, “the Mediterranean slaves certainly didn’t have it any better.”

According to political scientist Abraham H. Miller, “For over two hundred years, during the mid-1600s to the 1830s, Barbary Muslims trafficked in white people. The Ottoman Muslims trafficked in white people slavery started even earlier, in the 15th century. All in all, Muslims enslaved more than two million white people.”

Similarly, Sowell contends that the number of whites who were enslaved in North Africa by the Barbary pirates “exceeded the number of Africans enslaved in the United States and in the American colonies put together.” In fact, he adds, “white slaves were being brought and sold in the Ottoman Empire decades after blacks were freed in the United States.”

This raises an interesting question: Are white people today owed reparations?

Sowell knows the answer. “Nobody is going to North Africa for reparations, because nobody is going to be fool enough to give it to them.” “So,” Miller asks, “should white people condemn all Muslims for their role in the enslavement of white people? Should the white people of the Southern Mediterranean demand reparations from Muslims for the enslavement of their ancestors?”

I would go further: “Should present-day Muslims living in America be forced to pay reparations to white people living here today?” According to the logic of those who work in the reparations industry—you don’t have to be personally guilty or personally victimized to qualify—the answer is clearly yes.

Perhaps the U.N.’s chief Human Rights official can offer some advice. But to do so she would first have to admit that her selective interest in this subject makes her racist ideas unsuitable to continue. She should resign.

Contact this racist at: mbachelet@ohchr.org

The Power of Ice Cream

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , on July 24, 2021 by andelino

Are all those media items featuring Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi eating ice cream not a diversion from the serious issues of the day but rather a coded warning?

Consider this explanation from the Alzheimer’s Association Caregiver Tips & Tools:    

“Ice cream. It takes all of your worries away. It is soothing and delicious, and personable: everyone has a favorite flavor! Ice cream brings people with dementia to happier, warmer times when the treat was shared with friends and loved ones at special, joyous occasions. Ice cream has the power to immediately elicit soothing feelings at the very first taste of a single spoon full. It erases all the negative feelings related to the frustration and continues to stimulate pleasure receptors in the brain with every new scoop. And dementia (here is the best part!) allows one to fully enjoy the treat, with no concerns for calories, weight gain or dietary needs, completely guilt free! For people with dementia, ice cream is far more effective and safe than Prozac, or any other happy drug on the market!”

To prove the Alzheimer tips, Fraud-In-Chief Joe Biden breezed into Cincinnati for a CNN town hall with Don Lemon at Mount St. Joseph University in Cincinnati, Ohio. Very few people attended, while Joe struggled to keep his thoughts straight when talking about vaccines.

Well, yeah, lingering fears of the Wuhan virus could have frightened potential attendees from showing up.

And, well, yeah, it was after all struggling CNN event.

And well, yeah, it was the Fraud-In-Chief of the United States of America, the man who garnered 80 million votes from an enthusiastic American electorate.

Other than that, it was a large crowd for Fraud-In-Chief Joe Biden.

Don’t focus on Biden’s dementia; focus on his substantive statements

Biden drifts off answering a question during CNN’s town hall with Don Lemon

Democratic Party

Posted in uncategorized with tags on July 23, 2021 by andelino

The Democratic Party sees the world as the “Wild West”, and its long-term sur­vival de­pends on its abil­ity to ob­tain a “mo­nopoly” on power. De­spite its rhetoric, the Party pledges no al­le­giance to any par­tic­u­lar ide­ol­ogy, be it com­mu­nism, so­cial­ism or even the fer­vent na­tion­al­ism that your ed­i­to­r­ial stresses. The Party will pro­fess what­ever ide­ol­ogy jus­ti­fies its “power grab” and helps se­cure its power at the mo­ment. But make no mis­take, power is the Par­ty’s only be­lief.

The Party fol­lows no rules. Since its found­ing, it has not hes­i­tated to do what­ever it deems nec­es­sary to ob­tain and stay in power. We of­ten em­pha­size its re­liance on “vi­o­lence, ter­ror and fear”, but the Party is also a mas­ter of us­ing “de­ceit, lying and temp­ta­tion” to ad­vance its cause. Which ap­proach it takes at the mo­ment de­pends on whether the bal­ance of power shifts in its fa­vor or not.

The Democratic Party has em­braced lim­ited eco­nomic re­forms only be­cause it rec­og­nized that eco­nomic growth was nec­es­sary to main­tain its po­lit­i­cal power. But the Party re­mains deeply “hos­tile” to republican val­ues. It sees every­thing that Republican’s stands for, such as free and open elec­tions, as threats to its mo­nopoly on power. Un­der no cir­cum­stance will the Party tol­er­ate any real or even imag­i­nary threat to its power.

That’s why the Democratic Party is a dan­ger to the American peo­ple, global free­dom and religious val­ues.

Evolution Is White Supremacy

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on July 21, 2021 by andelino
“Detail of the first book of the Bible, Genesis”

Forty percent of Americans believe God created humans in His image within the past 10,000 years. The rest believe humans evolved over millions of years, with or without God’s guidance. Most college-educated people believe the “hypothesis of evolution” is a rational explanation for creation. So it should not be surprising that a popular science magazine like the “Scientific American” espouses it. What is surprising is the level of vitriol this publication levels at anyone who questions evolution.

On July 5, the “Scientific American” published an editorial by Allison Hopper, a white lady, titled “Denial of Evolution Is a Form of White Supremacy.” Since Hopper cannot accept that anyone would ever doubt evolution on scientific or religious grounds, she argues that creationists reject evolution because they are racists.

“I want to unmask the lie that evolution denial is about religion and recognize that at its core, it is a form of white supremacy that perpetuates segregation and violence against black bodies,” she wrote.

“In literal interpretations of the Christian Bible, white skin was created in God’s image. Dark skin has a different, more problematic origin. As the biblical story goes, the curse or mark of Cain for killing his brother was a darkening of his descendants’ skin. Historically, many congregations in the U.S. pointed to this story of Cain as evidence that black skin was created as a punishment. The fantasy of a continuous line of white descendants segregates white heritage from black bodies. In the real world, this mythology translates into lethal effects on people who are Black. Fundamentalist interpretations of the Bible are part of the ‘fake news’ epidemic that feeds the racial divide in our country.”

Now, Hopper is partially correct that some Protestant denominations in the United States formerly taught that Cain was marked with black skin. But this belief is no longer prevalent, and it never came from the Bible. In Genesis 4:15, the Hebrew word for “mark” is “owth”, and it indicates a boundary marker that God set up to separate Cain and his family from the rest of humanity after he murdered his brother Abel.

You can read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find anything justifying the belief that any race or ethnicity is inferior to another. The Old Testament refers to Eve as “the mother of all living” (Genesis 3:20); the New Testament says God “made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth” (Acts 17:26). Yet just as God created varieties within different plants and animals—with artistry and purpose—He created varieties of people.

“God does not reveal in the Bible the precise origin of the different races. But it is a fair conjecture that in mother Eve were created ovaries containing the yellow and black genes, as well as white, so that some of the children of Adam and Eve gave rise to black, yellow, as well as white.”

Despite Hopper’s protestation, the Bible teaches that God “made of one blood all nations of men.” It is evolution that teaches that some “races are inferior.”

The alternate title for Charles Darwin’s book “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection” was “The Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life.” Its premise was that only the fittest races survive. This book’s sequel, “The Descent of Man”, argued that some races were superior to others.

Throughout “The Descent of Man”, Darwin labeled various races as inferior to Europeans. In one passage, he said he would rather be descended from an “old baboon” than from South American Indian. In another passage, he predicted the extinction of the African races: “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”

Yet according to the Scientific American, creationists are “white supremacists” because they reject a theory formulated by a man who believed that blacks and Aboriginals were barely more evolved than gorillas. And they are racists because they cling to a religion that teaches that all races were created in the image of God.

Charles Darwin’s cousin, Francis Galton, used the ideas elucidated in “The Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life” to start the eugenics movement. This movement sought to improve humanity by excluding inferior people from the gene pool. Imperial Germany used tenets of social Darwinism and eugenics to justify the genocide of “inferior” races in Africa. National Socialist Germany used principles of social Darwinism and eugenics to justify the genocide of the Jewish people. And whether they realize it or not, those racial activists espousing critical race theory today are channeling this same Darwinian spirit when they substituted race conflict for class conflict in their quest to create a revolutionary coalition of ethnic minorities against a white majority.

Those who follow the Bible know that morality is God’s definition of right and wrong. But those who believe in evolution think morality is an invention of the human mind. Therefore, evolutionists believe humans can alter the definition of right and wrong at will because they are the authority that invented right and wrong in the first place.

After all, if humans are only the most sophisticated of the apes, then the rule of law must give way to the law of the jungle. “The strong rule the weak; only the fittest survive.”

Race war, genocide and other serious problems are not caused by “literal interpretations” of the Bible but are instead caused by society’s rejection of “literal interpretations” of the Bible.

“Higher education during the 20th century has come, with virtual unanimity, to accept the evolutionary theory. Higher education contemptuously ignores, without any consideration whatsoever, the biblical truths revealing man’s presence on the Earth and the causes of the present state of civilization. Education in the civilized world today has become entirely materialistic. Education has become a combination of the agnosticism of evolution, the politics and economics of Karl Marx, and the morals and social patterns of Sigmund Freud. Higher education remains in utter ignorance of the mystery of mankind and of human civilization.”

Until humanity comes to understand the mystery of mankind and of human civilization and accepts God’s inexorable spiritual law as static, stationary, eternal and unchanging, we stand in great danger. Unless the Creator, whose existence evolutionists so adamantly deny, intervenes to save this world’s sick society, social Darwinism and moral relativism will lead to the extinction of all life on Earth.

In the meantime, The Scientific American, claims it is “racist” to believe in Adam and Eve.

Biden Vaxxers

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on July 19, 2021 by andelino

After falling short of his vaccination goals this month, the Biden Administration has announced a new effort to encourage people to get vaccinated. President Biden and Press Secretary Jen Psaki are now riding across the country on bicycles, going “door-to-door” to spread the good news.

“Excuse me, sir, do you have a moment to talk about our Lord and Savior Dr. Fauci, and the salvation of Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson?” said Psaki as a local homeowner opened his door. “We want you to know how you can be happy and secure forever. Would you like to talk a little more about this?”

According to sources, the elderly homeowner slammed the door in their faces– causing Biden to angrily ring the doorbell over and over. 

“Hey! You listen here, Jack! You think I’m just gonna walk away and let you not get vaccinated?” he said. “Why, I’ll break this door down, take you behind the shed and beat you up! You think you can take me, chump?”

Psaki quickly calmed the disgruntled Biden down with a “Choc Chip” ice cream cone and led him on the sidewalk to knock on the next door. 

The pair will be touring the entire United States until everyone is either vaccinated or added to a secret FBI list as a possible “insurrectionist.”

Earlier this week, Psaki said the Biden administration’s plan is to have “targeted community door-to-door outreach to get remaining Americans vaccinated by ensuring they get the information they need on how both safe and accessible the vaccine is.”

Xavier Becerra, Biden’s secretary of health and human services, doubled down in defending the government tracking who has and has not submitted to the medical experiment. Of course, Biden’s predecessor set the way for widespread medical tracking with the massive COVID-19 testing and contact tracing program which got nary a reaction from the GOP who is all up in arms now, but I digress.

“The federal government has had to spend trillions of dollars to try to keep Americans alive during this pandemic,” Becerra said. “So, it is absolutely the government’s business, it is taxpayers’ business, if we have to continue to spend money to try to keep people from contracting COVID and helping reopen the economy.”

Excuse me while I rant a bit, but Xavier, where in the hell did you get the authority to steal trillions of dollars from us and to shut us down, and when did you develop godlike powers “to keep Americans alive” you arrogant, narcissistic, piece of shit.

Ok, back to the story. This move by the Biden administration is yet another “tyrannical” measure in a “year-plus of in-your-face tyranny.”

“It’s a foreboding fork in the road to totalitarianism,” said Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “We are now moving beyond the propaganda stage into this very coercive program where federal agents appear at American homes with the menacing message: ‘We know who you are and where you live. We have you on our list, we have your medical records, we want your neighbors to know that you are dangerous. We don’t recognize your property or privacy rights. You must take our untested, experimental pharmaceutical product. If you want to end this harassment, you must submit to a risky medical intervention made by an unscrupulous company with no liability and if you die or suffer permanent neurological injury, tough luck!’”

Martin Armstrong notes: “This is the most irresponsible vaccination in human history.”

And that, indeed, is the point and why they need this latest campaign. The COVID 19 shots are the deadliest shots in human history, according to the government’s own data. There are more recorded deaths due to these jabs than all vaccines over the last three decades combined. And it’s also deadly to the unborn. Buried data in a study published by the New England Journal of Medicine found that 82% of pregnant women in a study had a miscarriage within the first two trimesters after taking the shot.

“There has been no testing in advance because it is only for emergency use and there is no emergency,” Armstrong wrote. “Every medicine has a warning of interactions with other drugs or conditions. Not this one! The misinformation is outrageous and they call anyone who questions them a conspiracy theorist when they refuse to offer any testing or explanation as to why people should even get these experimental vaccines.”

Already, we’ve seen sheriffs going to homes forcing the shots on unwilling disabled participants in California and military in Texas randomly injecting people at bars. In 2011, the U.S. Congress gave authority to the government to set up a Community Preventive Services Task Force to make sure Americans are up to date on their vaccines as the government wants to force its drugs on us.

If one of Biden’s stooges comes to your door, know your rights. You are under no obligation to answer any of their questions, and if they are uninvited, they are trespassing. Make them feel ashamed for working for tyranny.

Brian Shilhavy writes: “Just ask them to leave, and if they don’t, then they’re trespassing, and you can deal with them however your state legally allows you to deal with trespassers.”

If necessary just follow “Shotgun” Joe Biden’s gun advise. “Well, you know, my Beretta will do better for you than your AR-15, because you want to keep someone away from your house, just fire the shotgun through the door. Most people can handle a shotgun a hell of a lot better than they can a semi-automatic weapon in terms of both their aim and in terms of their ability to deter people coming. We can argue whether that’s true or not, but it is no argument that, for example, a shotgun could do the same job of protecting you. Now, granted, you can come back and say, Well, a machine gun could do a better job of protecting me. No one’s arguing we should make machine guns legal.”

“You know, they make fun of my saying about use a shotgun if someone’s invading your home – guess what, use a shotgun on someone invading your home Biden said.

Biden Gun Advise

Multicultural AI Goons

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on July 18, 2021 by andelino

The age of human efforts is over. Now comes the age of the AI goons.

In a bid to better multi-ethnicize and multi-culturalize the intelligence community, the CIA has come up with a new plan that will allow the agency to meet its diversity quotas to the smallest percentage point and remain flexible in the face of any future adjustments. According to the new plan, the CIA offices will now be staffed by multi-cultural goons instead of agents, while the actual work will be done by artificial intelligence (AI) and Chinese back-office staffers.

The advantages are self-evident. First of all, some teams are just too small to fully accommodate their diversity quota. Thus, a team monitoring Chinese takeover of American universities may consist of four persons: two blind men, one deaf woman, and a liaison officer kindly provided by the CCP. With just four operatives it is impossible to get to the mandated 13.7% handicapped female, 58.2% Muslim, 96.5% POC, 83.7% Transsexual, 0.6% Zulu, 5.9% Pacific-Islander, and so on.

By using human goons, the diversity of even the smallest team can be adjusted to the quota of the day. If the government, peace be upon it, decides that an intelligence team needs to consist of 29% half-wits or 65% morbidly obese, it can just fill up their quota with “half-wits” or “obese” goons until the right concentration is reached.

The quota percentages for “half-wits” and morbidly “obese” are already being applied in “Fraud-In-Chief” Biden’s federal government, except of course for Biden himself, the token “white” male hired to meet some archaic diversity standard to be repealed as soon as President Kamala “Ho” Harris takes over.

Until that glorious day, “Fraud-In-Chief” has no real authority, we just dress him up and wheel him out when the A.F.G.E. union goons come around counting faces of color and genders of many.

Once the agency finds a way to de-contaminate all traces of “white” goons, this new system will get a green light to be implemented in all other government agencies.

What a “progressive” idea! They can even take the desired CIA agents and fill them with the right mix of the human goons, like sausages. The quota is met precisely to the most current standard, while their identities will remain appropriately classified since nobody wants to know how sausage is made anyway, except the guy in the video below.

Reparations Revolution

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on July 17, 2021 by andelino

“Slavery” is as old as mankind and it still thrives mainly in Africa and Asia. If you’re alive today, there’s a high likelihood that you have slaves in your ancestry. Should you get “back pay” for your ancestors’ labor? Toiling in the fields? Or building pyramids? Or castles? Or aqueducts?

No, because slavery was a solid norm until the “Age of Enlightenment.” If we accept the current notion of reparations, we must look at the past through the lens of the present’s frantic and constantly mutable leftist controversies. And where do we begin looking for victims? 3,000 years ago? 1,000 years ago?

No, we only start with the year 1619 in one British colony in America because—despite millennia of worldwide slavery—the radical left wants to “condemn” only America for slavery even though America was not an independent nation until 1776.

Now the U.N. (Uninvited Notions) wants to extend the blame to all formerly colonizing (White) nations, narrow the victims of slavery to only those of African descent, and fund Marxist BLM and similar groups to ensure that those of us who never owned slaves pay those of them who were never enslaved in order to bring about justice or something.

But note that it isn’t justice for all because there was a lots of slavery going on long before 1619 and it’s still happening. Why not go all the way back to ancient Persia and China? To Rome and Carthage and Egypt and Arabia? Why not condemn aboriginal Americans for their practice of slavery? Why not concentrate on current slavery?

Because this isn’t really about slavery, it’s about Marxism disguised as “black liberation” and it’s about redistribution of “wealth” from Whites to Blacks in order to bring about equity (equality of outcome). It would also bring about the end of Western civilization, which fits well with the U.N.’s Agenda 2030.

One Black billionaire’s call for a 14 trillion dollar reparation plan breaks down to about $500,000 per black American, and it doesn’t matter whether they’re descended from slaves if one accepts the pretense that all Blacks today are suffering from the effects of past transgressions by Whites.

It also doesn’t matter that most non-BIPOC people aren’t privileged enough to possess even a fraction of $500,000, so forget about any true “equity.”

It looks as if U.N. Human Rights Council Chief Michelle Bachelet got “blacked” by the Marxist BLM lies, but there’s a bright side: “the U.N. is one of the most useless and powerless organizations in the history of the world.”

Reparations for something that was once legal are the reintroduction of ex post facto law. Once the legal premise of ex post facto law is made a legal precedent there will be no such thing as law as such. All law will be built on a “quicksand of anarchy.” That’s why ex post facto law is unconstitutional.

But if you don’t call ex post facto law ex post facto law the basic legal premise has a chance to become legal precedent. You just pretend it isn’t ex post facto law. And then the magic really happens. Once they can establish the legal premise as a precedent there is no law, only dictatorship and dictates.

There’s a lot more than meets the eye here. The issue is never the issue, the “revolution is the issue.”

U.N. Rights Chief Demands Reparations for Slavery, Colonial Rule, and Racism

Online Reparations Revolution

Reparations or Revolution?

A Nuclear World

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on July 16, 2021 by andelino

“Useless at best, detrimental at worst.” That is how the late Charles Krauthammer described an agreement the Obama administration made with Russia in 2009 for the two nations to dismantle equal numbers of nuclear weapons from their stockpiles.

The deal was detrimental for the United States because it obligated it to eliminate state-of-the-art defensive weapons while Russia dismantled Soviet-era weapons that were strictly offensive in nature, archaic weapons that would have done little more than—as Winston Churchill once phrased it—“make the rubble bounce.”

At that point, Russia’s nuclear stockpiles were too primitive to make the deal even close to equal. And it did nothing to truly make the world safer. But much has changed in the 12 years since.

In his April 21 State of the Nation Address Russian President Vladimir Putin said, “The share of advanced weapons and hardware … in the nuclear triad … will exceed 88 percent already this year.”

This means that of all the warheads, intercontinental ballistic missiles, strategic aircraft, submarines and other components of Russia’s nuclear program, almost 90 percent have been modernized. In many cases, Russian versions of this deadly technology are comparable to the U.S. arsenal. Some of these weapons systems, such as hypersonic missiles, are believed to exceed their American counterparts.

Putin went on to say Russia is determined to continue “qualitatively strengthening” all aspects of its armed forces in order to keep closing the gap with the United States.

Even as Russians have suffered years of serious economic strain—exacerbated by the coronavirus pandemic and government lockdowns—Putin has always found room in the budget to spend billions annually on the military, especially on nuclear weapons. He is dead set on making them as state-of-the-art, lethal and unstoppable as possible.

The same day that Putin made his speech about Russia’s nuclear advances, Reuters published a report about China that can only be called a bombshell. In recent years, China has devoted billions of dollars in resources to building a new generation of advanced nuclear-power facilities. China’s ruling Communist Party has emphasized that these new plants are intended only to generate cleaner power by reducing its prodigious coal consumption. But the April 21 Reuters report states that the fast-breeder reactors at these facilities produce large amounts of the fundamental material used in advanced nuclear weapons.

“With a fast-breeder reactor, you now have a very large source of weapons-grade plutonium available to you,” the report quotes Navy Adm. Charles Richard, the commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, as saying. “That will change the upper bounds of what China could choose to do if they wanted to, in terms of further expansion of their nuclear capabilities.”

China is believed to have only 200 or so nuclear warheads. But whispers out of Beijing indicate that some Communist Party leaders want their arsenal to compare better to that of the U.S. (an estimated 5,800 warheads) and that of Russia (an estimated 6,375 warheads). It is hard to imagine that the new Chinese plants won’t help fulfill this ambition. The first one is scheduled to open in 2023.

In recent months, Iran has also advanced its nuclear weapons program. This fanatical regime could be mere months away from producing its first nuclear bomb. The also-fanatical and even less stable North Korean regime has improved its delivery systems for the nuclear weapons it already possesses. German military personnel have received more training on how to mobilize and drop the nuclear bombs that America has stocked in Germany. And more questions and concerns have emerged over how vulnerable Pakistan’s nuclear weapons are to terrorist hijacking, especially as America pulls out of neighboring Afghanistan.

Moreover, discussions have opened about the possibility of other nations—namely Japan, Poland, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Turkey and Ukraine—obtaining nuclear arsenals of their own.

In so many nations, nuclear developments are underway that expose the fragility of the global peace. They show that all of the attempts by the United Nations and other international organizations to reduce the nuclear threat have failed. None of man’s various disarmament efforts, peace plans or treaties have been able to secure sure and lasting peace.

All such deals lack a safeguard that can forcibly prevent the use of these unfathomably destructive weapons. And there is no true cause for hope.

During that age of Roman rule, warfare entailed hand-to-hand combat with swords, javelins, bows and slings. The closest thing to a weapon of mass destruction was probably an onager catapult. Even after another millennium had passed, Genghis Khan’s soldiers were armed with comparable weaponry: crossbows, sabers, re-curved bows and trebuchets. With these, the Mongols killed some 40 million people, one 10th of the total world population. By the 1400s, the arrival of gunpowder had led to widespread use of muskets and cannons. These developments greatly boosted a soldier’s killing efficiency. Yet even then, mankind still could not wage a war that “not a single person” could survive.

With the First World War came more major advances in weapons technology. Improved artillery and rifles, machine guns, poison gas, land mines, grenades, flamethrowers, tanks, bomb-dropping aircraft and torpedo-firing submarines made killing people unprecedentedly efficient. Mechanization of weapons in that conflict contributed to the deaths of 18 million people. In World War II, humankind took a quantum leap into the future of killing technology. Some 60 million people were wiped out by vastly improved artillery, proximity fuses, fighter jets, aircraft carriers, rockets, and finally—and most ominously—two atomic bombs.

A decade after World War II’s end, a major prophetic milestone was crossed. “Total annihilation of the human race by warfare was never possible—at any time in world history—until 1955! The Encyclopedia Britannica reports, ‘In August 1955 there was a general conviction among the governments that both sides in the Cold War had sufficient retaliatory power to make hydrogen bomb war suicidal’!”

So at that time, enough nuclear bombs had been built to blast all human life off the planet. The type of war Christ had warned about 2,000 years earlier had finally become not just possible—but dangerously probable.

This fact helps us see that many key Bible prophecies about World War III, including Matthew 24:21, could only be fulfilled in the modern, nuclear era. Today, the nations continue to hold each other at nuclear gunpoint—and the risks of these weapons being used are growing. When a global nuclear war erupts, millions of people will suffer nuclear fire, and millions more will suffer nuclear winter. Jeremiah 2:15 shows that some cities will be entirely scorched by nuclear devastation, without a single survivor. The worldwide carnage will threaten the existence of human life itself.

But the Bible’s prophecies do not end with nuclear war annihilating mankind. Continuing in Matthew 24, just after Jesus said that nuclear war in this age would be so devastating that it could wipe out humanity, He added a crucial detail: “But it will be shortened” (verse 22).

From this it is clear that nuclear World War III will erupt, but God will not allow it to run its course. Before Russia, China and other world powers detonate enough weapons to make man extinct, Jesus Christ will interrupt the carnage.

“The good news is God will shorten the time span and save us alive. But if He did not intervene, there wouldn’t be anyone alive on this planet. He will let it go a long way so that people learn they can’t rule themselves. Men don’t know the way of peace. God knows—and if you keep His law of love, it will bring great joy and peace into your life.”

Just after that time of unprecedented war, Christ will institute an epoch of unprecedented peace. Amos 9:14 shows that the devastated cities will then be rebuilt. They will become bastions of life and prosperity. Jeremiah makes clear that as the massive rebuilding project progresses, each individual will come to know the true God. Every person will learn to keep His law. As a result, “great joy and peace” will begin to fill the whole world.

“We are now at the edge of this nuclear abyss. But as all these horrible signs come to pass, we know Christ is about to return.” These are vital truths to understand: both the warning of war on the horizon and the good news about the hope just beyond it.

Fourth Branch Of Government

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on July 15, 2021 by andelino

It’s bad enough that none of the alphabet “security” agencies were written into our Constitution. Now they have become politicized. They no longer adhere to any rule of law. They ARE the law and can do what they want. They certainly aren’t answerable to the American people.

We saw former NSA Director James Clapper lie to Congress about collecting data from hundreds of millions of Americans and about leaking the Steele Dossier information. We saw ex-CIA director and communist John Brennan lie about spying on Congress. Nothing happened to them. They are above the law.

The CIA now allows and approves torture. They call it “enhanced interrogation.” Yep, we a rogue agency engaged in torture.

We saw the FBI push through “illegal” FISA warrants in order to take down President Trump during the bogus Russia collusion malarkey. We saw how Mueller used over a dozen heavily FBI men to surround a peaceful, non-resisting Roger Stone on trumped-up charges. The CIA-influenced CNN was, of course, tipped off to the early morning raid.

We saw the FBI help encourage Trump supporters to protest at the Capitol while refusing to release videotapes that will prove their operatives were there. The FBI even seized a lego-made capitol building from one of the so-called “insurrectionists.”

We saw the FBI sit on Hunter Biden’s laptop. They did nothing. They certainly did not investigate the obvious corruption on display by the Biden’s. They also knew all about Epstein’s child abuse for years. They did nothing.

Tucker Carlson told us how the NSA is spying on his email in order find something that could possibly get him kicked off the air. Tucker confirmed what we knew already—Snowden had already told us all about it. Snowden is a whistleblower and hero, but he had to escape prosecution and possible assassination through exile to Russia.

We saw how false flag “terrorism” was used to give the TSA new powers to “grope and fondle” people at the airports.

All of these so-called “security agencies” have grown in scope and power over the years and, like “Big Government”, they want more power and influence over the direction of the country. They are aligned with the radical left and globalism.

What’s next? Will we see a Lubyanka prison constructed in Washington D.C.? Will the political enemies of Biden’s regime be whisked off the streets and shoved into cramped cells and then subjected to “enhanced interrogation” until they “confess?” Don’t be surprised if this happens. Don’t be surprised if a “network of gulags” is also set up.

The FEMA camps won’t be about “slave” labor, though. They’ll be about the “extermination” of the security agencies’ political enemies.

JFK wanted to break up the CIA. It’s too bad he was executed by them instead. Allen Dulles was fired by Kennedy, yet he was the leading man on the Warren Commission, which helped cover up the CIA’s crime.

It’s time to break up the CIA for good. Let the military conduct intelligence gathering on foreign countries. Stop trying to subvert other countries. That often leads to blow-back and endless war.

Break up the FBI too and let individual states assign marshals to fight real crime—not investigate or invent wrong doings against their perceived political enemies.

Do away with the NSA for their gross and repeated violations of the law. It’s a felony to read private mail of US citizens. Let the branches of the military monitor foreign enemies and let us Americans have our Fourth Amendment back.

The politicized security agencies will always hide and cower behind the magical phrase, “national security!” They are allowed to know everything about us. We are allowed to know nothing about them. When that happens, people begin to “fear and despise the government.

It should be the other way around…and besides, the security agencies are NOT the government and our government is not the country.

Ben Garrison

EcoHealth Alliance

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on July 14, 2021 by andelino

For months, Big Tech companies did all they could to prevent information about the true origins of Covid 19 from reaching the public. Both Facebook and YouTube banned posts mentioning the lab-leak theory. At the same time, Google manipulated its search algorithms to suppress searches for “coronavirus lab leak.” When a Wall Street Journal reporter asked Google Health Vice President David Feinberg why Google was censoring searches about the lab-leak theory, Feinberg said Google did not want to “lead people down pathways that we would find to be not authoritative information.”

Yet new reports reveal there may be another reason Google did not want people researching the lab-leak theory. Google was funding “EcoHealth Alliance” President Peter Daszak’s research and did not wish to expose its role in kicking off a pandemic that caused the worst recession since World War II.

Investigative reporter Natalie Winters released a report on June 19 noting that Google.org has been funding “EcoHealth Alliance” research for over a decade. Among the studies Google.org funded was a 2010 study on bat flaviviruses, a 2014 study on henipavirus spillover from fruit bats to human populations in Africa, a 2015 study on Macacine Herpesvirus-1 in long-tailed macaques, and a 2018 study on the chances of an animal virus crossing over into the human population of China.

Why was the charity arm of Google so interested in funding Dr. Peter Daszak’s research?

“EcoHealth Alliance” is a United States-based nongovernmental organization that aims to protect people and animals from infectious diseases. Yet under Dr. Daszak’s leadership, this organization has funneled nearly $600,000 to the “Wuhan Institute of Virology” for research on bat coronavirus. EcoHealth Alliance took most of the money sent to Wuhan from a $3.7 million grant it received from the “National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,” which Dr. Anthony Fauci heads. Other government donors to EcoHealth Alliance’s research fund include the Pentagon, the State Department, the National Science Foundation, the Department of Homeland Security and the Fish and Wildlife Service.

Altogether, EcoHealth Alliance has received at least $60 million from American taxpayers and an undisclosed amount from Silicon Valley tech giants like Google to research various viruses.

All this funding becomes tremendously significant if it turns out that Covid 19 leaked out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. EcoHealth Alliance funded a 2015 study where Chinese virologist Shi Zhengli and others spliced the spike of a bat coronavirus onto a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone to create a new chimeric virus. Suppose this research advertently or inadvertently created Covid 19. In that case, EcoHealth Alliance, the U.S. government and Google all have a lot to answer for.

Political commentator Steve Hilton believes Google’s ties to EcoHealth Alliance may be one of the biggest scandals of our time.

“It’s honestly one of the biggest scandals for, I don’t know, a hundred years,” Hilton said on Fox News Primetime. “I can’t think of a bigger one when you think of the consequences of this pandemic and the idea that it was created by scientists who were arrogantly operating outside the bounds of the regulations that were in place and then covering their tracks. … It’s a really shocking story, and it just adds to this increasingly big mountain of evidence that we have got a massive establishment cover-up going on because the people at the heart of this know what they did.”

Google executives knew the money they were giving Dr. Daszak was being sent to China. Still, they sent the money and tried to censor their role in this research when a coronavirus leaked out of the lab. This raises disturbing questions about what other types of morally ambiguous research Google is funding.

Calico Life Sciences llC is a subsidiary of Google’s parent company Alphabet, Inc. Its stated goal is to combat aging and associated diseases. One of its molecular biologists, Cynthia Kenyon, has engineered roundworms that live six times longer than usual. Now Calico Life Sciences is partnering with Ancestrydna (the largest-profit genealogy company) to research the genetics of human life spans. The goal is to hack the code of life and genetically engineer humans who can live beyond 120 years.

China has been trying to steal people’s DNA data for years to get the genetic information it needs to manufacture ethnically specific bioweapons. So the fact that Ancestrydna is partnering with a company just caught collaborating with the Wuhan Institute of Virology is not comforting.

Many scientists working for Google and the Chinese Communist Party are not content bio-engineering corona viruses and roundworms. Their real desire is to bio-engineer human beings. Yet as the Covid 19 pandemic proves, trying to play God and create new life forms comes with dangerous consequences.

The fact that Google and a myriad of U.S. administrative agencies were using EcoHealth Alliance to conduct gain-of-function experiments in China is proof that Silicon Valley is a node of the “deep state.”

“There is the visible United States government, situated in imposing neoclassical buildings around the Mall in Washington, D.C., and there is another, more shadowy and indefinable government that is not explained in Civics 101 or observable to tourists at the White House or the Capitol,” former congressional aide Mike Lofgren writes in his book The Deep State.

“The former is the tip of an iceberg that is theoretically controllable via elections. The subsurface part of the iceberg operates on its own compass heading regardless of who is formally in power. Washington is the most important node of the deep state, but it is not the only one. Invisible threads of money and ambition connect the town to other nodes. One is Wall Street, which supplies the cash that keeps the political machine quiescent and operating as a diversionary puppet show. This inverted relationship is also true between the visible government and Silicon Valley, defined here in its broadest sense to mean not only hardware and software companies but the telecommunications backbone that enables these devices to work.”

Lofgren explains how the different nodes of the deep state operate to subvert America’s constitutional form of government. Still, he does not explain the root cause behind why the deep state exists. Barack Obama “filled America’s law enforcement agencies with treasonous agents” and “led what is known as the ‘deep state.’” Then, after explaining that Obama is the real head of the deep state, he explained why the deep state exists:

“God has blessed America like no other nation. And the devil wants to destroy America like no other nation! Satan is marshaling every tool and weapon he can to wreck this nation, and he is having alarming success! This evil spiritual power is influencing the radical left! Most Republicans don’t realize what they are dealing with: people who are absolutely committed to destroying the government of this land!”

The networks pushing to finance dangerous genetic experiments and Internet censorship are a tool of the “deep state” to destroy America’s constitutional government.

%d bloggers like this: