Food Stamp Fraud

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on July 17, 2019 by andelino

Democrats in a House agriculture subcommittee lashed out at a retired “millionaire” who applied for and received “food stamps” in an effort to prove that “eligibility” for the government “benefits” in his home state of Minnesota were “too lax and easily exploited.”

Rob Undersander noticed several years back that “income” was the only criterion for receiving benefits from the “Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program” (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps.

A retired engineer with a seven-figure “nest egg” but no real income, Undersander decided to perform an “experiment” to determine if someone as “well-off” as he and his wife could obtain the “benefits.”

“I’ve got the SNAP form in my hand and I’m thinking of my financial situation, and I said ‘you know, I just can’t believe this. So I went down to the second floor of the Sterns County Courthouse, stood in line a little bit, handed in the application and three weeks later I’m getting food stamps, and a balance on my EBT card.”

Although he was not “invited” to formally testify, Undersander was in attendance at a subcommittee meeting designed to look at “broad-based categorical eligibility” for benefits like SNAP.

Undersander did not “falsify” any portion of his application and everything he did was completely “legal.” He also carefully “tracked and donated” all of the monies he received from the program back into his community tobenefit the needy.”

House Democrats, however, were not happy. “And let me just also say for the record, I think if someone intentionally defrauds the federal government, they ought to go to jail,” said Rep. Jim McGovern, a Democrat from Massachusetts.

“Mr. Undersander did not break the law, he simply abided by the rules that were in place, so he didn’t defraud anybody,” said Rep. Mike Conaway, Republican from Texas.

“He intentionally defrauded the federal government. That is, in my opinion, breaking the law” McGovern shot back.

McGovern’s office did not respond to requests for comments as to how specifically Undersander “broke a law” or questions as to whether he would refer Undersander to the attention of a U.S. attorney for prosecution.

Republicans have long argued that the loose “eligibility” requirements create an environment in which resources are “diverted” away from the truly needy.

“I’m a flat-out 10th Amendment kind of guy as well, but these are federal resources that we’re talking about and the states should have restrictions on how those resources are deployed, and I don’t think it’s unreasonable that those restrictions make sense. Having an asset test ignored on SNAP is regrettable.” Conaway said in his opening statement.

Being threatened with “prosecution” is not new for whistle-blower Undersander.

“You knew this was wrong and you did it anyway,” a Democratic Minnesota state lawmaker said to Undersander in 2018 as tightening the state “eligibility” rules was under debate. “I find it pretty despicable. … I am just sorry there is no way we can prosecute you.”

Republican staffers said Democrats were holding “hearings” in anticipation of rule changes that could be delivered soon from the White House that might “tighten” some eligibility and distribution elements of the program.

Democrats repeatedly referred to what they described as a war on the poor. “You willfully and maliciously gamed the SNAP,” said subcommittee Chairwoman Marcia Fudge, a Democrat from Ohio, addressing Undersander.

“You, an alleged millionaire, used mis-characterizations of your finances to cheat the program. You took benefits meant for the very seniors in Minnesota you served through your volunteer work. And you did this all to continue the right-wing crusade against poor people,” not once mentioning about the “raid” on a Ohio multi-millionaire.

He boasted that his companies developed multi million-dollar properties across the globe, from St. Lucia to Southern California to the Middle East. His sprawling, 8,000-square-foot home in Russell Township, Ohio, complete with horses and in-ground swimming pool, plus multiple expensive sports cars attested to the lifelong success of Ali Pascal Mahvi.

Yet there he was, waiting his turn, a “prince becoming a pauper” asking for food stamps in Geauga County, Ohio. And, he got what he asked for. For himself, his wife, and their three adult children. For two years, the family was handed about $300 a month in government food stamps. They also wanted help to pay their gas and electric bills. And Medicaid. They needed and got Medicaid.

The conservative leaning think tank “Foundation for Government Accountability” produced a video highlighting Undersander’s story. “When I filled out that form, I used an abundance of honesty and caution. I was honestly hoping the application would be denied” Undersander said.

FGA estimates 33 other states are like Minnesota in that they only test “income and not assets” when it comes to SNAP.

2.5 Million Food Stamp Households Off Benefits Under Trump
Shop Owners Plead Guilty to $3.4 Million Food Stamp Fraud

Democrats and Hitler

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on July 16, 2019 by andelino

The only thing worse than wanting “open borders” is Democrats comparing “everything” to Hitler.

Alexandria “Sandy” Ocasio-Cortez keeps insisting that detention centers for “illegal” immigrants are somehow “Nazi” concentration camps.

The “Barmaid” from the Bronx has always had a “penchant” for hyperbole, remember the world “ending in 12 years,” but now she chose to take it to the “next level” arguing that the US has established “concentration camps” for immigrants where they are “being brutalized with dehumanizing conditions and dying.”

“This is not hyperbole. It is the conclusion of expert analysis,” she said. Who those “Experts” are she’s not divulging.  She also completely “ignores” Barack Obama’s dealings with “illegal” immigrant minors who were mistreated in custody during the Obama years and locked away, in what was by the press coined as “Hieleras” or “Freezers.”

Here is a link to a Washington Post story, no fans of President Trump, or the Republicans, entitled: ACLU alleges that immigrant minors were mistreated in custody during Obama Years. 

Obama blatantly “broke” the law to keep kids in private prisons, disregarding US district judge Dolly Gee ruling that his administration was “ignoring” the Flores Amendment to keep “illegal” immigrant children locked up past the 20-days U.S. law allowed.

As usual, when a member of the press “counters” Ocasio-Cortez’s fiction, AOC “attacks” them just like her supposed “Nazi” Donald Trump?

“Well, @chucktodd – the fact that you slipped in ‘Nazi’ when I never said that is pretty unfortunate. Almost as unfortunate as the fact that you spent this whole time w/o discussing DHS freezers, ‘dog pounds,’ missing children, & human rights abuses that uphold use of this term.” — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 19, 2019

When AOC used the “Nazi” terminology  “never again” Conservatives and Democrats rightly called her out on “diminishing” the Holocaust.

But as usual, her allies in the media, and her fellow Democrats “defended” the simpleminded socialist by hair-splitting whether “concentration” and “death camps” were the same, and trying to argue she didn’t really refer to the ”Holocaust” despite saying “never again.”

It wasn’t long before Yad Vashem and the Auschwitz museum got involved, “lecturing” both AOC and her media allies that they should not take the name of the “Holocaust” in vain, nevertheless, they persisted.

According to AOC and “delusional” Democrats, you’re either for “open borders” or you’re a “Nazi” racist. During the 1990’s both parties started referencing “Hitler and the Nazi” in propaganda “designed” to get the US involved in another war.

When the Clinton administration started banging the “war drums” to get involved in the former Yugoslavia, politicians “exploited” WWII imagery, invoking “genocide” and urged the West to intervene to stop a new“Hitler.”

In 2003 Bush referenced “Hitler” when talking about Iraq, and the Obama administration invoked“Hitler” in 2011 to make his “case” for U.S. involvement in Libya and Syria.

But the Democrats didn’t stop invoking “Hitler’s” name when it came to just describing some “mad” regime. After President Bush’s election, they started comparing “Bush to Hitler” on a regular basis. an organization “created” by George Soros and the Democrats calling for America to “impeach” philandering “rapist” Bill Clinton posted in 2004, an anti-Bush campaign ad that showed the 43rd president’s face morphing into “Adolph Hitler’s.”

From that “point” on, every Republican presidential candidate has been likened to the “Nazi” leader by Democrats.

John McCain in 2012, and Mitt Romney in 2016 both were announced as the second coming of “Hitler” but the Democrats clearly jumped the “Hitler” shark with Donald Trump.

Armed and masked activists calling themselves ANTIFA,” who were literally “assaulting” people on the street, were “labeled” by Democrats and the fake media “Nazi’s” despite the fact they clearly weren’t.

According to new Democratic “dogma,” if you are against “Open Borders” or not giving “Illegal Immigrants” the exact same rights as  American citizens, then you are a “Nazi” and deserve to be “assaulted.”

The main stream press recently lost their minds after Dayton, Ohio granted a permit for a “Nazi” white Supremacist rally. Taking the “hyperbole” to heights unseen, the Press corps “warned” Americans to stay away because the anticipated “violence” will have the streets of Dayton running “red” with blood.

Guess how many “Nazi” white supremist came to the huge “KKK” rally that the press claimed would show just how “racist” America had truly become under President Trump… NINE!

Democrats now use WWII to “validate” their insanity. AOC claimed “Climate Change is our WWII because we only have 12-years-left.” Amazingly the only thing that “WWII” and the “Green New Deal” have in common is the American “deaths” they will cause.

While we lost over 400,000 Americans in WWII that will be “pale” in comparison to how many Americans will die if the “Green New Deal” became law. It’s not even debatable… the “Green New Deal” will result in the “death” of millions of Americans.

There are no electric trucks to bring food to cities.
• There are no electric driven heavy equipment to build infrastructure, or buildings.
• There are no technologies that will produce enough energy to replace gas and oil.
• There is nothing to replace the fuel we need for cars, trucks, planes and heat our homes or cook food.
• Even if there were a power source to replace fossil fuels, we have no way of storing it.
• Battery technology is still on par with the first battery invented by Italian physicist Alessandro Volta in 1800.

Democrats like Cory Booker who is running for President, immediately started invoking “World War II” while declaring his “support” for AOC’s Green New Deal. Referencing “WWII” is already “bad” enough without the added dimension of the Democrats “historical” ignorance.

Other Democrats have gone this “Nazi” false equivalence route also.

Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.)

Tennessee’s first Jewish member of Congress compared Republicans to “Joseph Goebbels,” Adolf Hitler’s propaganda henchman during World War II.

Of course, all was forgiven with his “fake” apology, insisting he didn’t mean to call his Republican colleagues “Nazis” for their opposition to the health care reform law. He added “I would certainly never do anything to diminish the horror of the Nazi Holocaust as I revere and respect the history of my people.” Really? His “Sorry, not Sorry” apology was just as “insane” as his original comments were. Cohen, in fact, did “compare” Republicans to Joseph Goebbels, and he certainly “diminished” the memories of the 6 million Jews that were slaughtered.

Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.)

On the “International Holocaust Remembrance Day” no less, Clarke stood in front of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office in Manhattan and stated, “We are standing in front of a building that has become the headquarters for the Gestapo of the United States of America.” Congresswoman Clarke “compared” American men and women who help “enforce” dangerous immigration laws that Congress passed to the most vicious, ruthless group of “Nazis”, who targeted millions of innocent Jewish men, women, and children in concentration camps and murdered them in cold blood.

Marianne Williamson 

2020 Democratic presidential candidate Marianne Williamson recently said that the announcement by President Trump that ICE will begin mass deportations is “no different” than when Jews faced deportation in 1930s Nazi Germany. She then doubled down saying “I have visited the Anne Frank house. I’ve been to those places where people hid Jews in the basement. When I think of the fear that some of these people are going through right now since the president made that announcement — where are they going to go?”

Anne Frank was “hiding” from the Nazi’s because she feared being “brutalized, raped and killed” or being sent to a “concentration camp” and then “brutalized, raped and killed.”

“Illegal” Immigrants only fear being “caught” and then set “free” back into their own country without being “brutalized, raped or killed.”

Joe Biden Campaign

A CNN analyst and senior adviser at the “University of Delaware’s Biden Institute” charged that President Trump’s call to “reclaim” America’s heritage was similar to the rhetoric used by “Nazi” leader Adolf Hitler. Hysterically, former Vice President Joe Biden made virtually the same call to “Reclaim America’s Heritage” in 2011.

Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC)

Clyburn told CNN Don Lemon “I can only equate one period of time with what we are experiencing now and that was what was going on in Germany around 1934 right after the 1932 elections when Adolf Hitler was elected chancellor.” His remarks are historically illiterate and fundamentally dishonest.

Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA)

In a New Years day speech, held by the Atlanta NAACP, Johnson said: “Our democracy teeters on the brink of failure. Americans elected an authoritarian, racist, anti-immigrant strongman to the nation’s highest office. Hitler rode a wave of nationalism and anti-Semitism to power. Replace anti-Semitism with ‘all Latinos crossing our borders are rapists, drug dealers and murderers.’ Does that sound familiar? Americans, particularly black Americans, can’t afford to make that same mistake about the harm that could be done by a man named Hitler or a man named Trump.”

In fact, Johnson’s speech was so “repugnant” Rep. Dan Crenshaw posted a video on Twitter “denouncing” Johnson’s idiocy.

“Stop insulting Americans just because they vote for someone you don’t like.” — Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) January 6, 2019

There are some Republicans that make similar comparisons between Democrats and “Nazi’s.” The big difference between the two parties is how much more “outrage” there is when a Republican says something similar.

And the double standard doesn’t end there, it also happens when the time comes to “pay the piper” for their idiocy. When Republicans do or say something “foolish” they are hounded until they resign, or dragged out of office. A Democrats simply say’s “Oops, my bad” and all is forgiven by Washington and the media.

Democrats need to end their “Nazi” bullshit, or start holding Obama to the same exact “standards” they’re holding Donald Trump to.

Congress Is Dysfunctional, So Send in the Cavalry
D’Souza traces roots of Democratic Party to Hitler’s Nazi Party

Catholic Death Wish

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , on July 15, 2019 by andelino

Pope Francis calls on the faithful to be as “blind to real life dangers” as he is. When he’s not pushing “global” warming and “open” borders, he’s pushing partnership and “brotherhood” with Islam.

Pope Francis called for a “reform” of the way theology is taught in Catholic schools, saying students must learn about “Islam” and that overall there must be greater “freedom in theological research and academic pursuits.” 

The “Jesuit” pope made the call during a speech at the Jesuit run “Theology University” in Naples, Italy. It follows his outreach this year to the Muslim world with the signing of a “joint statement” with the imam of Cairo’s Al Azhar, the seat of Sunni learning, establishing the relationship between Catholics and Muslims as “brothers with a common mission to promote peace.”

In his speech, Francis said “dialogue and partnership” with the Muslim world is necessary “to build a peaceful existence, even when there are the troublesome episodes by fanatic enemies of dialogue.” Catholic theology students must learn the culture, language and way of thinking of  Muslims “to better understand and live out our relationship,” he said.

After the theologically doctrinaire papacies of St. John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI, Francis has stressed instead the need to “walk together” with interfaith partners, often joking that theologians should “ruminate” on a deserted island while religious leaders press ahead with “dialogue” on the ground. He has also called for a more pastoral, merciful and conscience-driven approach to “sticky” theological problems, such as Communion for the civilly “remarried.”


The Pope is pushing for Catholic students to be taught the “lie” that normative Islam is a “religion of peace” and so, it follows that anyone who “disagrees” with this lie would be deemed “intolerant” opposed to dialogue and pluralism.

In truth, it is Islam that is “intolerant, supremacist and resistant to diversity.”

If the Pope is genuine about “dialogue” then he should be mutually calling for Islamic States and Islamic schools, beginning with Al Azhar University in Cairo, to establish and preach equal status to all “disbelievers, women, gays” etc., and promote dialogues with unbelievers like “Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists” etc.

In his “promotion” of Islam, the Pope has become “the Grand Sheikh Francis of Al Vatican“, and is dismissing the sufferings of “persecuted” Christians, victims of jihad “terror and assaults.” The Pope’s call for reform within “the way theology is taught in Catholic schools” is a continuation of his dogged efforts which are subjugating “Christianity” under Islam.

In a meeting with hundreds of alumni of Jesuit schools in the Vatican, Francis told his hearers that authentic hospitality “is our greatest security against hateful acts of terrorism.”

With your help, the Pope said, “the Church will be able to respond more fully to the human tragedy of refugees through acts of mercy that promote their integration into the European context and beyond.”

Francis continued, “I encourage you to welcome refugees into your homes and communities, so that their first experience of Europe is not the traumatic experience of sleeping cold on the streets, but one of warm human welcome.”

Pope Francis, the leader of 1.2 billion Roman Catholics, told reporters aboard his plane returning from a visit to Turkey that he understood why Muslims were “offended” by many in the West who automatically equated their “religion with terrorism.”

The Argentine “communist” pope, who has been trying to foster cooperation with so-called “moderate” Islam in order to work for peace and protect Christians in the Middle East, said it was wrong for anyone to react to terrorism by being “enraged” against Islam.

And if that isn’t bad enough, Pope Francis recently called for the “opening” of Europe’s borders even wider than they already are so that Muslim “invaders” can advance their plan of creating a worldwide “Islamic” caliphate. How do you say “traitor” in Latin?

During the meeting, al-Issa thanked the Pope for his “fair positions” on what he called the “false claims that link extremism and violence to Islam.” In other words, he thanked the Pope for dissembling about the motivating “ideology of jihad terror” which his group has been accused of “financing”, and for defaming other religions in an effort to “whitewash” Islam.

The Grand Imam of Cairo’s al-Azhar, Ahmed al-Tayeb, has extended his gratitude and thanked the Pope for his “defense of Islam against the accusation of violence and terrorism” while Christianity is still waiting for the Pope to “defend it against widespread Islamic persecution.”

In direct contradiction to Pope Francis, Cardinal Robert Sarah, prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, has called it “his duty” to warn fellow Christians and Europe that Islam is not benign but “expansionary and threatens free societies.”

He stated: “As during the fall of Rome, elites are only concerned to increase the luxury of their daily life and the peoples are being anesthetized by ever more vulgar entertainment… The barbarians are already inside the city.”

He was referencing to Muslim “migrants” who have now immigrated but not “integrated” into Western societies.

It is only a matter of time before the Pope promotes “Mohammad over Jesus.”

Soon Pope Francis will become a “born again” Muslim!

I’m With Stupid

Posted in uncategorized with tags , on July 14, 2019 by andelino

Simpleton “Socialist” Alexandria “Sandy” Ocasio-Cortez may be a Washington, D.C beltway “crusader” with 4 million Twitter followers but she’s “hated” inside her NYC 14th District.

Thanks to a shameless media “fawning” over Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and by continuing to cover for her insanity, she has gained a nationwide “I’m With Stupid” reputation.

But in order to “stay” in Congress, Sandy still has to “win” her 2020 election, and things aren’t “going so well” for AOC in her NYC home district.

It was just over a year ago that an unknown “barmaid” at a Mexican Taco restaurant pulled off a “stunning” win in the primary for New York’s 14th congressional district in taking down the 4th most “powerful” Democrat in the House, Joe Crowley.

But that “victory” had more to do with Crowley being “lazy” and not taking the election “seriously,” than her district being energized by AOC’s “socialist” agenda. In fact she didn’t run on “anything close to what she is spouting today.”

Having won the “primary,” election to Congress was all but “assured” since AOC was coming from a “district” that Nancy Pelosi described as “A Glass of water would win if it had a ‘D’” next to its name.” 

The moment she “pulled” off her win over Crowley, Ocasio-Cortez started getting the Hollywood “Tinseltown” treatment months before she even was “sworn” in.

AOC was featured on late night shows and “hailed” by DNC Chairman Tom Perez as the “future” of the Democrats, despite her “inability” to present “coherent” ideas and equating “feelings” with facts.

With a national news media “excusing” away her many missteps, the young socialist “dolt” quickly leveraged her newfound celebrity into having enough “social media” clout that she even “challenged” worn out alcoholic Speaker Nancy Pelosi as the most “influential” Democrat in Washington.

But instead of becoming “smarter,” AOC started making even bigger “gaffes” that not even the “fake” news media could cover.

While the Main Street media can smooth out many of her “rake to the face” blunders, they can’t protect her from the “local” news, and the people in her district have become well aware of her “stupidity.”

NYC 14th District covering parts of Queens and Bronx has been hit hard by AOC’s “idiocy.”  

  1. Her ”Green New Deal” that called for the elimination of “farting” cows, sealed her low IQ and “embarrassed” her district.
  1. In her first few months constituents grew “upset,” seeing that AOC would hardly “visit” her district, but seemed to have “plenty of time” to appear on late night TV or her “Instagraming with an Idiot” channel.
  1. She cost the people of her distinct a chance at “landing” one of the 25,000 jobs that Amazon was bringing to her district, until AOC “torpedoed” the deal by stirring the pot so badly that Amazon pulled out.
  1. AOC continually “attacking” America and President Trump hasn’t won over any “fans” in her district. Her constituents aren’t “radical” leftist loons, they’re “proud” immigrants who view themselves as “Americans first and immigrants a distant second.”
  1. Six months into her “reign of idiocy” AOC hasn’t even bothered to “open” a congressional office in the Bronx for voters to go to when they have a problem.
  1. AOC putting on a “Green New Deal Run” in Queens was billed as showing support for her “climate” change bill. Little did the people know that AOC was actually “charging” children $20 to run in the event, while “hiding” the fact that these fees were going directly into her “campaign”
  1. Now her latest “ridiculousness” about the U.S. running “concentration camps” along the U.S. southern border has only “alienated” her even further from the people and “values” she is supposedly be representing.

All this and more has “resulted” in the latest polls showing that only 13% of her “constituents” can say with certainty they will vote for the “Barmaid” again in 2020.

“Just 13% seem to want to reelect AOC. Poll from opposition group @stoptheaoc finds her disliked, distrusted, unwanted in her own NY district” — Paul Bedard (@SecretsBedard) June 18, 2019

On top of her daily “foolishness,” the reason for AOC’s numbers being so “low” is that it is pretty apparent she cares “little” about serving the Bronx or Queens.

In fact Sandy has much higher “goals” than just serving in the House of Representatives. Thankfully “I’m With Stupid” is constitutionally “barred” from running for the office of president until 2024.

Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution reads:

“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”

AOC plays a little game to figure out that “No Ethics Laws” apply to the President and accidentally “reveals” why she wants to be President.

Sandy Ocasio Cortez eyes the “presidency” but not until 2024 after Donald Trump “term has expired.”

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez Ignores The Very People Who Elected Her To Congress
Vietnam Vets Walk Out Of Ocasio-Cortez Meeting

Ilhan Omar Tax & Marriage Fraud

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , on July 13, 2019 by andelino

Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar “improperly” spent thousands of dollars in campaign funds on “non-campaign” expenses in 2016 and 2017 while serving in the “state legislature,” Minnesota’s campaign finance and public “disclosure board” ruled.

“Here are the Minnesota Campaign Finance & Public Disclosure Board’s conclusions of law in re.” @IlhanMN /2 — Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) June 6, 2019

“Here are the orders of the Minnesota Campaign Finance & Public Disclosure Board in re. @IlhanMN requiring that she pay up, plus describe fully and disclose the amounts she paid for “immigration service’s” related to her divorce with 10 days. Tick tock. /3 — Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) June 6, 2019

The state board ordered Omar to personally “reimburse” her campaign for just under $3,500 the campaign spent “on out-of-state” travel for Omar and on her “joint tax returns.” — David Steinberg (@realDSteinberg) June 6, 2019

Omar is also required to pay a civil “penalty” of $500 for using campaign funds to pay for her “travel” to a conference in Florida, where she received an “honorarium” for speaking.

Republican Minnesota state Rep. Steve Drazkowski filed the initial complaint in July 2018, alleging Omar’s “campaign” had paid attorneys $2,250 for “services” related to Omar’s 2017 “marriage” dissolution.

Drazkowski later amended his complaint to “include” the payments Omar’s campaign made for her personal travel.

While the state board did find that Omar’s campaign made “improper” expenditures, it did not find the $2,250 went toward Omar’s marriage dissolution.

“The 2016 payment of $2,250 from the Omar committee to the Kjellberg Law Office was not a payment for Rep. Omar’s subsequent marital dissolution,” the board stated in its findings.

“The $2,250 payment was a reimbursement for two payments made by the Kjellberg Law Office. One payment of $750 was made to De Leon & Nestor, LLC for obtaining immigration records and one payment of $1,500 was made to Frederick & Rosen, Ltd. for services related to Mr. Hirsi’s and Rep. Omar’s filed joint tax returns of 2014 and 2015.”

“I’m glad this process is complete and that the Campaign Finance Board has come to a resolution on this matter. We have been collaborative in this process and are glad the report showed that none of the money was used for personal use, as was initially alleged,” Omar said in a statement her campaign released.

But there was something much more “damning” in the report that isn’t making it into the “mainstream” news.

“The report’s finding that @IlhanMN committed SIX campaign finance violations is, amazingly, not the report’s key takeaway.” — David Steinberg (@realDSteinberg) June 6, 2019

The report states that @IlhanMN and “Ahmed Hirsi” filed “joint tax returns” in 2014 and 2015, “yet they were not married.” But @IlhanMN was married to “Ahmed Nur Said Elmi” from 2009-2017.

“According to both federal and MN law, this is illegal.” — David Steinberg (@realDSteinberg) June 6, 2019

“As I have written, @IlhanMN likely committed a remarkable number of additional felonies due to her fraudulent 2009-2017 marriage,” he wrote. “Today’s report appears to confirm the worst of them: @IlhanMN may have filed EIGHT YEARS of fraudulent federal and state tax returns.”

For years, Steinberg and others have meticulously documented evidence that strongly supports, if not proves, “Omar married her brother” to game the immigration system so they could attend college together at North Dakota State University shortly before Omar was first elected to state office.

Public records and documented social media activity shows Omar initially applied to wed Ahmed Hirsi, the father of her three children, but instead married Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in 2009. The two lived at the same residence with Ahmed Hirsi throughout their college years in North Dakota, and Elmi eventually returned to the United Kingdom in 2011.

And while Hirsi and Omar presented themselves as a married couple, both in the media and to the federal tax authorities, they were not legally wed until 2018, after Omar’s divorce with Elmi was finalized, PJ Media reports.

Numerous since deleted social media posts show Elmi and Omar remained in close contact before, during and after the marriage, despite claims in divorce documents that she’d had no contact since 2011, according to Alpha News.

Omar offered a lame excuse for the situation and described the accusations she married her brother as a racist witch hunt in 2016, but has not addressed the overwhelming evidence, including school reports, marriage records, social media posts, her own comments in the media, official address records, divorce documents filed in 2017, and other public information.

“In 2002, when I was 19 years old, Ahmed Hirsi … and I, applied for a marriage license, but we never finalized the application and thus were never legally married. In 2008, we decided to end our relationship in our faith tradition after reaching an impasse in our life together,” Omar wrote in the 2016 statement to Fox 9.

“I entered into a relationship with a British citizen, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, and married him legally in 2009. Our relationship ended in 2011 and we divorced in our faith tradition. After that, he moved home to England. I have yet to legally divorce Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, but am in the process of doing so. Insinuations that Ahmed Nur Said Elmi is my brother are absurd and offensive.”

“Since 2011, I am happy to say that I have reconciled with Ahmed Hirsi, we have married in our faith tradition and are raising our family together. Like all families, we have had our ups and downs but we are proud to have come through it together.”

Omar has since married Hirsi, but refuses to discuss the allegations, preferring instead to frame any criticism as a “racist” smear campaign.

Based on interviews and credible publications, it appears that Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar never “legally obtained U.S. citizenship” and therefore, does not meet the “constitutional qualification” to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives.

“No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the age of twenty-five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States…” – U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 2, clause 2 [1]

Evidence Of Ilhan Omar Citizenship Fraud
Ilhan Omar Gave Interviews To Host Who Called Israel “Jewish ISIS.”

Taming the Dragon

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on July 12, 2019 by andelino

For far too long China has taken “advantage” of the West when it comes to “trade.”

Former politicians have consistently “caved” in to China, especially the Obama’s, the Clinton’s and the Biden’s who likely gave the Chinese whatever they “wanted in exchange for campaign donations.”

H.W. Bush said by opening up “trade” with China, our relations with them would become “friendlier.” He was China’s useful “idiot.” Instead of becoming our friend, “bad” trade deals only made China a “wealthier” enemy. They still consider us an “archenemy” while Bush did nothing after the “Tiananmen Square” massacre.

We know what China has done to “Tibet, the Uyghur and they still want to invade Taiwan.” They are building “islands” in the South seas to help with their future “military” conquests. Regardless, we finally have a president willing to “stand up” to them, and they must view that with “alarm.” If they refuse to “compromise,” it could bring down their “over-extended” economy.

China has long been using “unfair, xenophobic” trade policies to “shaft” other countries. Western nations, especially the USA, have “relocated” way too many industries to China.

China not only “utilizes” vast, cheap labor, but they also have no “moral” compunction when it comes to “spying” on foreign corporations or even “stealing” foreign products, processes and technologies. That includes stealing “military” secrets, that is, when the Clintons weren’t “handing” it over to them outright. They’ve “manipulated” their currency to give them a “constant” advantage.

China has been around for over 5,000 years and they’ve learned to take a “long-range” view of things. They are very “patient” with their newest “Belt and Road Initiative”, which of course is “world” domination. I once heard a “translation” of President Xi’s comments when he “visited” America early in Trump’s presidency. Xi flatly stated that he was a “communistic atheist.”

That means he “worships” himself. He recently proved that by ordering his subjects to “love and worship” him. He’s becoming the “new” Mao and like that dictator, Xi’s delusional religion is his own “relentless” expansion of power. He probably grew “accustomed” to world leaders “applauding” China’s habit of “ripping” them off.

President Trump wants to end the “rip offs.” Such a push back against China has been “long” overdue.

Gen Tech Generation

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on July 11, 2019 by andelino

Today’s young adults, dubbed “GenTech” generation understand that their “online” lives are valuable and tradable commodities.

As digital technologies facilitate the growth of both new and incumbent organizations, we have started to see the darker sides of the “digital economy” unravel. In recent years, many unethical business practices have been exposed, including the capture and use of consumers’ data, anti-competitive activities and covert social experiments.

But what do young people who grew up with the Internet think about this development? Research with 400 digital natives – 19- to 24-year-olds – shows that this generation, dubbed “GenTech” may be the one to turn the “digital” revolution on its head.

Findings point to a “frustration and disillusionment” with the way organizations have accumulated real-time information about consumers “without their knowledge and often without their explicit consent.”

Many from “GenTech” now understand that their online “lives” are of commercial value to an array of organizations that use this “insight” for the targeting and personalization of products, services and experiences.

This era of accumulation and commercialization of “user data” through real-time monitoring has been coined surveillance capitalism and signifies a new economic system.

A central pillar of the modern “digital” economy is our interaction with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms. A survey found that 47% of GenTech do not want “AI” technology to monitor their “lifestyle, purchases and financial situation” in order to recommend them particular things to buy.

In fact, only 29% see this as a “positive” intervention. Instead, they wish to maintain a sense of “autonomy” in their decision making and have the opportunity to freely “explore” new products, services and experiences.

As individuals living in the “digital age”, we constantly negotiate with technology to let go of or retain control. This pendulum-like effect reflects the ongoing battle between the human and technology.

Research also reveals that 54% of GenTech are very “concerned” about the access organizations have to their “data”, while only 19% were not worried.

Despite the EU General Data Protection Regulation being introduced in May 2018, this is still a major concern – grounded in a belief that too much of their data is in the possession of a small group of global companies, including “Google, Amazon and Facebook.” Some 70% felt this way.

In recent weeks, both Facebook and Google have vowed to make “privacy” a top priority in the way they interact with users. Both companies have faced public outcries for their lack of openness and transparency when it comes to how they “collect and store user data.” It isn’t long ago that a hidden microphone was found in one of Google’s home alarm products.

Google now plans to offer auto-deletion of users’ location history data, browsing and app activity as well as extend its “incognito mode” to Google Maps and search. This will enable users to turn off tracking.

At Facebook, CEO Mark Zuckerberg is keen to reposition the platform as a privacy-focused communications platform, built on principles such as “private interactions, encryption, safety, interoperability, communications across Facebook-owned apps and platforms and secure data storage.”

This will be a tough turn around for the company that is fundamentally dependent on turning “user data” into opportunities for highly “individualized” advertising.

“Privacy and transparency” are critically important themes for organizations today – both for those that have “grown up” online as well as the incumbents.

While GenTech want organizations to be more “transparent and responsible”, 64% also believe that they cannot do much to “keep their data private.” Being tracked and monitored “online” by organizations is seen as part and parcel of being a “digital” consumer.

Despite these views, there is a growing revolt simmering under the surface. GenTech want to take “ownership” of their own data. They see this as a “valuable” commodity, which they should be given the opportunity to “trade” with organizations. Some 50% would willingly share their “data” with companies if they had something in return, for example, a “financial” incentive.

GenTech are looking to enter into a “transactional” relationship with organizations. This reflects a significant change in attitudes from perceiving the free access to digital platforms as the “product” in itself, in exchange for user data, to now wishing to use that data to “trade” for explicit benefits.

This has created an “opportunity” for companies that seek to “empower” consumers and give them back “control” of their data.

Several companies now offer consumers the opportunity to “sell the data” they are comfortable sharing or take part in research which they get “paid” for. More and more companies are joining this space, including, Killi and Ocean Protocol.

Sir Tim Berners Lee, the creator of the world wide web, has also been working on a way to “shift the power” from organizations and institutions back to citizens and consumers. The platform Solid offers users the opportunity to be in charge of where they “store” their data and who can “access” it. It is a form of “re-decentralization.”

The Solid POD (Personal Online Data storage) is a secure place on a hosted server or the individual’s own server. Users can grant “apps access” to their POD as a person’s data is stored centrally and not by an app developer or on an organization’s server. We see this as potentially being a way to let people take back control from technology and other companies.

GenTech have woken up to a reality where a life lived “plugged in” has significant consequences for their individual “privacy”, and are starting to push back, questioning those organizations that have shown “limited” concern and continue to exercise “exploitative” practices.

It’s no wonder that we see these “signs of revolt.” GenTech is the generation with the most to lose. They face a life ahead “intertwined” with digital technology as part of their personal and private lives.

With continued pressure on organizations to become more “transparent”, the time is now for young people to make their move.

%d bloggers like this: