The Vax Scene

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , on October 14, 2021 by andelino

Are You On The Fence About Taking The Vaccine? Watch Stephen Colbert and his dancing “Syringe Drag Queens” do the “Vax Scene” and your doubts will vanish promptly away!

When the great state of Florida went for Trump in 2020, Trevor Noah posted a video of Florida being vaporized by alien attack, killing all 22 million residents in the process. This is what the great comedic minds of “The Daily Show” like to laugh about. Stephen Colbert also thinks there is a huge segment of the “population unfit to live”, and it is to those people his “Vax Scene” video is actually directed.

Stephen Colbert professes to be a Roman Catholic, and like his “papal” forefathers, he would re-institute a modern-day Spanish Inquisition if he could, burning at the stake as many anti-vaxxers as he could. But until they are in power, you will just have to settle for dancing syringe drag queens pushing the jab.

If you like unfunny Liberal comedians, you have a wide range to choose from. Start with the talentless Trevor Noah who only has a job “because he’s black”, Jimmy Kimmel who used to love dressing up in blackface and using the n-word, all the way up to Stephen Colbert who doesn’t even “pretend to be funny.”

“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.”― George Orwell, 1984

The one level it succeeds on is their revelation of how much they hate everyone who does not think they way they do, and that given the chance, they would have us all put to death without reservation or hesitation. Make sure you watch the video below of Stephen Colbert and Oprah mocking God, the Bible and Jesus Christ, that’ll be an eye-opener if you still need one.

Colbert discussed with guest Oprah Winfrey the possibility of her running for president in 2020. Winfrey famously said that if she were to run for president, she would need a “sign from God.” So Colbert had “god” show up to discuss it.

“When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.” – Maya Angelou

If I was on the fence about taking the vaccine my mind would be made up instantly to not take it.

We live in a world where the insane people are the ones making the rules, where the ongoing murder of babies is not only tolerated but demanded, and where the enslavement of the global population is happening at a stunning rate. Over on the Communist YouTube, they are deleting all videos that going against the party line.

As part of a new set of policies aimed at cutting down on anti-vaccine content on the Google-owned site, YouTube will ban any videos that claim that commonly used vaccines approved by health authorities are ineffective or dangerous. The company previously blocked videos that made those claims about coronavirus vaccines, but not ones for other vaccines like those for measles or chickenpox.

What explains these insanities that are insults to the people’s intelligence? Did Americans go mad because of the perfect storm of COVID-19, the quarantine, recession, riots, looting and arson of 2020, the wild November election, the post-election hysterias and riot, and the Biden-socialist Faustian bargain?

Or do these symptoms of long-standing illnesses arise from the media and university, where the twins of incompetence and ideology ruined the critical consciousness of an entire generation of young minds?

Or is the culprit the affluent, bi-coastal woke professionals, who, as both narcissists and projectionists, feel the consequences of their own ideology should never apply to themselves, while fobbing off their own sins onto others as a way of squaring the circle of their own illiberality?

Get the picture now? Either you side with Stephen Colbert and are part the “vax scene”, or you’re nobody, locked out of your local system as well as the larger global system.

And that part I mentioned about them “burning us at the stake” if they could?  Prepare yourself, because that’s “on deck” right now if the Lord tarries.

The Symptoms of Our Insanity

COVID-19 Is the New Global Warming

If We’re Rome, Who Are the Barbarians That Will End Us?

Anti Satellite Weapons

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on October 13, 2021 by andelino

China is making major advances in its development of weaponry intended to disable or destroy satellites, according to remarks made last week by the director of the United States Indo-Pacific Command.

China is building an array of weapons with abilities ranging from “dazzling to jamming, to kinetic kill-from-the-ground, from space—all that, they’re on the march,” Rear Adm. Michael Studeman said during an intelligence-security webinar, according to Bloomberg.

The SJ-17 satellite is among the Chinese assets believed to be able to attack satellites in orbit. This satellite is dirigible and equipped with a robotic arm that can be controlled by Chinese operatives on the ground. The Center for Strategic and International Studies noted that it has been observed in recent months engaging in unusual behavior including navigating up to other satellites in orbit and interacting with them.

So far the SJ-17 has approached only other Chinese satellites. But experts say there is little that would stop it from navigating up to those of other nations, and using its arm to seize and then hinder or disable them. James Dickinson, commander of the U.S. Space Command, told a congressional hearing that such satellites “could be used in a future system for grappling other satellites.” He called attention specifically to the SJ-17, saying it could potentially put U.S. satellites out of commission.

China is also developing ground-based laser systems believed to be capable of blinding satellites in orbit. “There is open-source evidence of four or five main sites that house the technology,” Brian Weeden, director of Program Planning for Secure World Foundation, told National Defense. “All of the sites have distinctive large buildings with roofs that slide back,” he said, adding that some of the facilities support adaptive optics for targeting objects.”

Whether from space or the ground, China’s capacity to incapacitate U.S. satellites is “significant” because “the next major war could be decided in the opening minutes of the first day, as each side attempts to disable the enemy’s communication tools,” Nikkei said.

Onlookers may suspect that a fear of “mutually assured destruction” would prevent China from attacking American satellites since the Chinese also have many satellites in orbit that the U.S. could target. But the reality is that America has far more satellites in orbit than China or any other nation, and relies on them to an unmatched degree.

This means the U.S. has far more to lose than China.

“And the answer is… 1,308.” https://t.co/dQslQtWK35 https://t.co/D1C9ORfyO1 pic.twitter.com/h2d5wRQoHk — Statista (@StatistaCharts) July 15, 2020

The U.S. depends on its 1,308 satellites for everything from weather monitoring and television broadcasting to telephone and Internet technologies. There is also the Global Positioning System, a constellation of 33 satellites that Washington makes freely accessible to anyone on the planet with a GPS receiver.

This $12 billion feat of engineering provides users with all manner of positioning, navigation and timing services. Most importantly, around 130 of America’s satellites are used exclusively by the U.S. military for reconnaissance, communication, navigation and targeting systems.

This means America is considerably more vulnerable to satellite attacks than any other nation. Frank Rose, co-director of the Brookings Institution’s Center for Security, Strategy and Technology, spoke about this vulnerability to National Defense last week. “Adversarial nations are developing anti-satellite weapons because they believe space represents an asymmetric vulnerability of the United States,” he said. “I expect that Russia and China will continue to develop and deploy a full range of ASAT [anti-satellite] capabilities.”

Steve Lambakis, an international affairs analyst, also addressed this threat recently and emphasized America’s military vulnerability. “U.S. space systems are among the most fragile and vulnerable assets operated by the U.S. military,” he said. The multi-billion dollar infrastructure is “vital to nearly every activity of the United States and, increasingly, the armed forces of U.S. allies.”

Much has been written on several occasions about the perils of America’s reliance, specifically its military, on computer technology that is susceptible to enemy attack. Analyst Joe de Courcy, who termed this reliance “the Western world’s Achilles’ heel.” This was a reference to the apparently invulnerable warrior of Greek mythology who was susceptible to harm only on his heels.

“America is the greatest superpower this world has ever known. But we have a very vulnerable point in our military—our own Achilles’ heel. This liability is so dangerous that I am amazed it hasn’t received more publicity.”

This an “alarming” scenario if in the near future U.S. military technology would be hijacked by adversaries. Will it be because of computer terrorists?

U.S. Debt Trap

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on October 12, 2021 by andelino

Record inflation combined with unprecedented governmental spending has pushed the United States into a “debt trap,” says the Bank of International Settlements in its annual report published June 30. Costs to service the U.S. debt could exceed levels previously seen only in times of war.

According to the report, inflation has reached concerning levels, and governmental spending shows no signs of slowing down. The U.S. economy faces a hard choice. Either leave interest rates as they are, let inflation run its course and possibly get worse; or raise interest rates, making payments on the national debt more expensive and causing other unintended ripple effects.

Inflation in the U.S. has reached 5 percent. Since 2000, the only time rates were equal to or higher than they are right now was in June, July and August of 2008.

A “debt trap” occurs when inflation spikes during times of high governmental spending. Normally, the Federal Reserve would raise interest rates to restrain inflation. This makes it costlier to obtain loans, slowing the economy and lowering inflation. Yet because of the past year’s massive governmental spending, raising interest rates would increase the cost to service the debt to unprecedented levels. It could also cause asset prices to crash. America is trapped. It can’t slow inflation without crashing the economy.

There is no shortage of debt in the United States: Joe Biden’s American Rescue Plan, passed on March 6, is estimated to cost up to $3 trillion by the American Enterprise Institute. Before that, $5 trillion also went to various projects purportedly intended to help the national economy recover from coronavirus.

Currently, the national debt is $28 trillion; the deficit is also at a record high. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that this year, the deficit will reach 15.6 percent of gross domestic product. The national debt is predicted to reach 108 percent of GDP, a level higher than the 106 percent seen after the Second World War.

High costs of servicing the national debt can do long-lasting harm to the economy. This takes away government financing from productive uses, such as developing infrastructure, expanding manufacturing or funding research. It makes the country less able to pay back the debt in the future.

The Bank of International Settlements isn’t the only institution to notice the danger. British economic analyst Ambrose Evans-Pritchard wrote in the Telegraph that “Deutsche Bank has come close to accusing the U.S. Federal Reserve of an economic crime.” Germany’s largest bank did not mince words when it reported that U.S. inflation is causing “a chain of distress around the world.” It qualified American debt as a “time bomb.”

“The most basic laws of economics, the ones that have stood the test of time over a millennium, have not been suspended. An explosive growth in debt financed largely by central banks is likely to lead to higher inflation,” stated the Deutsche Bank report.

The Germans even took a veiled jab at the influence of American politics and Joe Biden’s Rescue Plan. “We worry that the painful lessons of an inflationary past are being ignored by central bankers, either because they really believe that this time is different, or they have bought into a new paradigm that low interest rates are here to stay, or they are protecting their institutions by not trying to hold back a political steamroller.”

German bankers have taken more notice of America’s “debt trap” than most Americans. Some are losing trust in the American system and the dollar. Is their warning mere passing criticism or worth taking seriously? A source even more important than Deutsche Bank says the ultimate outcome of America’s addiction to debt is much more serious than most realize.

Jean Monnet, a founder of the common market that became the European Union, said, “Europe will be forged in crises and will be the sum of the solutions adopted for those crises.” Economists agree that a financial crash in the U.S. would profoundly affect Europe.

A financial crisis will be a major factor in the unification of Europe and “could suddenly result in triggering European nations to unite as a new world power larger than either the Soviet Union or the U.S.” This trend has existed for some time. Europe responded to the 2008 crisis by rewriting rules and creating regulatory agencies, centralizing its economic control.

More recently, the coronavirus has resulted in decreasing reliance on the dollar and, by extension, the American financial system. As part of its recovery strategy, Europe began unprecedented debt-sharing and became more financially centralized. Russia and China accelerated their plans to abandon the dollar, choosing instead to hold Euros and Chinese yuan in its sovereign wealth fund.

Sentiment around the world is increasingly turning against the American financial system, which has dominated the global economy since World War II. Though it may not happen immediately, the days of trusting the U.S. appear limited.

The days surrounding September 11, 2008, are now infamous. The image of many of America’s most prestigious financial institutions rapidly collapsing has been etched into the minds of the American populace. In reality, that disastrous week represented a turning point in U.S. financial power.

What remains is a gaping crater in the nation’s now-discredited economic core. America’s economy will never fully recover.

Consumer prices are up, up, and away; is inflation here to stay?

NSA Surveillance

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on October 11, 2021 by andelino

Eight years ago, the Guardian newspaper confirmed that the United States National Security Agency was conducting widespread, untargeted, domestic surveillance on millions of American citizens. In a report by Glenn Greenwald, the paper published an order from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court directing Verizon to give the National Security Agency (NSA) a record of every Verizon customer’s call history, regardless of whether the individual was suspected of any wrongdoing.

Shortly after Greenwald exposed this unconstitutional surveillance, NSA contractor Edward Snowden provided proof that Big Brother not only eavesdrops on you, it also reads your mail. Specifically, Snowden exposed a program called PRISM. This was a spying program in which nine major tech companies (AOL, Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, PalTalk, Skype, Yahoo and YouTube) provided the NSA and Federal Bureau of Investigation with their users’ e-mail messages, audio and video recordings, photographs, documents and location data.

Why did the government need this data? A recent NSA scandal involving talk show host Tucker Carlson sheds light on why government agents may be reading your texts.

Carlson accused the National Security Agency of searching his e-mails for damaging material that would force Fox News to take his television show off the air. “It’s not just political protests that the government is spying on,” he said. “Yesterday, we heard from a whistleblower within the U.S. government who reached out to warn us that the NSA, the National Security Agency, is monitoring our electronic communications and is planning to leak them in an attempt to take this show off the air.”

Carlson’s claim elicited a rare public denial from the NSA. “This allegation is untrue,” read a statement posted on the NSA’s Twitter account. “Tucker Carlson has never been an intelligence target of the Agency and the NSA has never had any plans to try to take his program off the air.” Yet the most significant thing about this denial is what it does not mention.

Former Central Intelligence Agency analyst Fred Fleitz noted that the NSA has not actually denied reading Carlson’s e-mail. Rather, it emphasized that Carlson was not an “intelligence target” and that the NSA “never had any plans to try to take his program off the air.” But since the NSA is conducting untargeted surveillance on millions of Americans, it did not have to target Carlson to get his e-mails—it already had them.

So the real question is not: Was the National Security Agency monitoring the electronic communications of Tucker Carlson? The real question is: “Why did the National Security Agency pull Carlson’s file?”

According to Axios political correspondent Jonathan Swan, Carlson was talking to U.S.-based Kremlin intermediaries about setting up an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin shortly before he found out about the spying scandal. Journalists routinely reach out to world leaders to request interviews, but Carlson did not tell anyone other than his executive producer about the potential interview.

So how did Swan find out about it? Swan cited anonymous sources “familiar with the conversations,” and the whistleblower who talked to Carlson told him that sources in the intelligence community had revealed the content of his e-mails to a reporter in Washington, D.C.

The practice of revealing the names of American citizens corresponding with foreign nationals under NSA surveillance is called unmasking, and it can only be done at the request of officials with proper security clearance, provided they have a good reason.

According to Fleitz, the order to unmask Carlson probably had to come from senior U.S. officials. Only a small cadre of trusted staff at the NSA is part of the unmasking process, so the order to leak Carlson’s e-mails to a D.C. reporter almost certainly came from the White House.

Fleitz says he cannot think of a valid reason why a White House official would want to unmask the name of a U.S. journalist, but Carlson claims to know the reason. He says the NSA leaked his e-mails in a premeditated effort to “paint me as a disloyal American, a Russian operative (I’ve been called that before), a stooge of the Kremlin, a traitor doing the bidding of a foreign adversary.”

If this was the NSA’s motive, it would not be the first time it spied on an innocent American and then leaked out-of-context information to the media to destroy his political career.

President Obama met with some of his top intelligence officials on Jan. 5, 2017, to discuss the dangers Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn could pose to his legacy. Handwritten notes from FBI agent Peter Strzok show that Obama brought up details about private conversations between General Flynn and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. This shows that Obama’s NSA had been monitoring General Flynn’s phone calls and relaying the details to the president.

Seven days after this meeting, the Washington Post’s David Ignatius published a story about Flynn’s contacts with the ambassador. How did Ignatius know about the content of Flynn’s phone calls? The Obama administration illegally leaked that information to him in an attempt to frame General Flynn.

Now the Biden administration is attempting to do the same thing to Tucker Carlson. It does not take much imagination to visualize how the Biden administration could use mass surveillance technology against a lot more political opponents than just Donald Trump, Michael Flynn and Tucker Carlson.

In Communist China, the government assigns citizens a “trustworthiness” score based on data gathered by mass surveillance. If a Chinese citizen makes a political post online without a permit or questions a government decision, his trustworthiness score goes down and the police may show up at his door.

That is the power the Chinese Communist Party has garnered by trawling through troves of social media and online shopping data. And the U.S. government has the same power if it chooses to use it.

When Sen. Frank Church led an investigation into CIA, FBI and NSA activities in the 1970s, he warned that technological advancements were giving these agencies unprecedented surveillance powers. “If this government ever became a tyranny, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know,” he said on NBC’s Meet the Press. “I don’t want to see this country ever go across the bridge. I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision so that we never cross over that abyss.”

More recently, NSA whistleblower William Binney told James Bamford that the NSA was building a turnkey totalitarian state, where all the government had to do was turn the key and start up a totalitarian dictatorship far worse than the one in China.

Many believe that if Hillary Clinton had won the 2016 presidential election, the “deep state” officials who were building the turnkey totalitarian state Binney warned about would have been able to continue running the country behind the scenes, thus ending our constitutional republic. The only reason this did not happen is that God showed mercy and raised up President Donald Trump to expose what was happening. Now the Biden administration has picked up where the Obama administration left off and is targeting all who oppose its agenda to fundamentally transform America.

Millions of Americans are waking up to the threat the deep state poses to the nation, but they still do not understand the root causes behind the crisis. The Bible reveals that the serious problems in America’s government are not caused by one man or a group of government officials. Ultimately, they are caused by the sins of the American people as a whole (Isaiah 1:4-7).

Only repentance by the people can prevent the sickness in America’s government from escalating into full-scale revolution and civil war.

Illegal Immigrants

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on October 10, 2021 by andelino

A new analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies finds that rising immigrant populations around the United States will result in Democratic politicians winning more elections. Therefore, the Democrats are doing everything they can to encourage more progressives to move to the U.S.—legally or illegally. Preliminary data indicates that Border Patrol at the U.S.-Mexico border has encountered almost a million illegal immigrants attempting to enter the country since Joe Biden took the oath of office—more people than live in the city of San Francisco.

The Biden administration blames Donald Trump for the problems on the U.S.-Mexico border, saying Trump refused to share critical information during the presidential transition period. Leaked e-mails show that “Fraud-In-Chief” Biden has enlisted the U.S. Air Force to resettle illegal immigrants in U.S. cities.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson revealed that a Pentagon whistleblower had sent him some incriminatory e-mails from Lt. Col. Matthew Burrows of Laughlin Air Force Base in Texas. In these e-mails, Colonel Burrows informs his subordinates that they will be using passenger aircraft to transport illegal immigrants around the United States, settling them in various cities and towns.

He also informs them they are banned from taking photographs or revealing that this operation is happening. After Carlson obtained copies of Colonel Burrow’s e-mails, both military spokesmen Chris Mitchells and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement confirmed that personnel at Laughlin Air Force Base were indeed relocating foreign nationals into the interior of the country.

During Donald Trump’s presidency, the Pentagon refused to protect America’s southern border, saying that was not their job. Yet now the Pentagon has no problem using taxpayer dollars to fly Latin American immigrants from the U.S.-Mexico border to cities and towns inside the United States. Tucker Carlson also noted that since “Fraud-In-Chief” Biden took the oath of office in January, there have been reports of commercial and charter buses transporting tens of thousands of illegal aliens to cities in Florida, Georgia, Kentucky Massachusetts, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina and Tennessee.

Since this program to resettle illegal immigrants in U.S. cities was supposed to be secret, there is no official word on why the government is pouring resources into it. And since Congress has not passed an amnesty bill, nor have courts granted these immigrants asylum, the program is illegal and unconstitutional. “What you’re watching is demographic transformation, in our country, without our consent and in violation of our laws,” said Carlson. “It’s moreover a violation of the most basic promise of democracy, which is that citizens get to control who runs the government.”

Some analysts think demographic shifts caused by illegal immigration could turn Texas into a Democratic stronghold by the 2024 presidential election—meaning no Republican would be able to win a future presidential election. Democrats would be able to transform the U.S. into a socialist state simply by nixing voter ID laws that require people to prove they are citizens before voting.

“This is an orchestrated, Communist assault on America, to destroy America’s borders, to create confusion in America, to overwhelm the system politically,” New Zealand author Trevor Loudon told the Epoch Times. “You can see what 15, 16, 20, 25 million new Democratic voters is going to do to this country. You will lose Texas; you’ll lose Florida; you will lose Georgia, Arizona, North Carolina. There will never be, ever, another Republican or conservative president in our lifetimes. You will have a one-party state in America. And that is the plan. That is why they are doing this.”

The Biden administration could have used passenger planes at Laughlin Air Force Base to deport illegal immigrants back to their home countries, but it has deliberately chosen to illegally resettle them in U.S. cities as part of a strategy to fundamentally transform America.

It is time for the American people to wake up! Foreigners are eating away America’s strength, yet we don’t even care. It is amazing how few people will really talk about what is happening.

Media reports describe the fearsome surge of illegal migrants pouring across the border, but America’s leaders are so senseless that they are deliberately abetting this crisis.

Death By Chocolate

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , on October 9, 2021 by andelino

We have all heard the term comorbidities in conjunction with reports of deaths from Covid. For many, this is a new, and not fully understood word. It sounds frightening, especially when used in the context of a global pandemic. To get an idea of what it means and the context in which it is used, I’ve put together a short example to help clarify.

Most of us have heard the expression death by chocolate.“ What if, though, that idea were taken seriously? What if a government authority were to require that all death certificates list chocolate as the principal cause of death if, at any time in the months preceding death, the individual had consumed chocolate?

What if they required it when it was only suspected that the person had eaten chocolate? Doctors could list all the other conditions that the individual suffered from as “comorbidities.” These other conditions might include heart disease, stroke, drug overdose, diabetes, gunshot wound, traffic accident, suicide, suffocation, pneumonia, influenza, cancer, and many other conditions, any of which might well be lethal in themselves. What if every individual listed with chocolate as the primary cause of death also had, on average, over 2.5 of these other conditions as well?

Would you believe that those deaths were actually a result of eating chocolate, or might you suspect someone was “fudging the data”, so to speak? What if you knew that the authority that mandated the chocolate reporting had ties to an anti-chocolate group that was promoting a drug they claimed would prevent chocolate deaths?

I think most of us would want some sort of proof that chocolate was actually the cause of death. We might even ask what fraction of those reported deaths had only chocolate listed as a cause, just to get some baseline estimate of the lethality of chocolate. There would be some inaccuracy with that approach, but at least we could rule out most of the confusion about possible deaths from other causes besides chocolate. What if we found that only about 6% of the death certificates listed chocolate as the only cause?

Now that wouldn’t eliminate chocolate as contributing in the other cases, but it would set a reasonable bound on chocolate deaths given the high lethality of most of the other conditions. We would likely conclude that even if chocolate were a contributing factor, it probably shouldn’t have been listed as the primary cause. At worst, chocolate might only have been the last straw, rather than the first.

Now most of us would find the idea of chocolate as a major cause of death to be rather fantastic. We would feel that someone was, as the saying goes, trying to pull a fast one on us. We would know that while chocolate might have some negative effects, like acne, it probably was not the cause of massive death counts.

We would know because nearly all of us have experience with chocolate, have given gifts of chocolate to friends and loved ones, and have received such gifts ourselves. We know chocolate as a tasty treat, and few would consider it lethal. The whole situation would run counter to our own experience, so we would be inclined to reject any reports of the massive lethality of chocolate.

What if, though, instead of chocolate, a different cause were given, perhaps one suggestive of large-scale lethal events of history? What if the alleged cause were something that only a few experts were familiar with and where there was much disagreement among those experts as to just how severe the cause might be? What if the cause was something that most people could experience without even knowing? What if among those who were more severely affected, the vast majority would recover with few or no consequences?

As it turns out, in March 2020, the US Centers for Disease Control issued a “chocolate” mandate where they required that Covid be listed as the primary cause of death if a Covid infection was even suspected in the preceding months.  Physicians were instructed to record Covid as the principal cause even if the ultimate cause was something else if a plausible argument could be made that a Covid infection led to the later cause.

An example given in the CDC instructions is acute respiratory distress resulting from a pneumonia infection brought on by Covid in an elderly patient. Given that pneumonia is a high-risk infection in the elderly, it would be just as plausible to conclude that the patient died from the pulmonary obstruction brought on by a pneumonia infection and that pneumonia also made the patient susceptible to a secondary Covid infection. Which came first? Chicken or egg?

That same list of “comorbidities” given for chocolate also applies to Covid deaths. It seems difficult to see how a Covid infection could be listed as the principal cause of a gunshot death or a suicide, or a traffic accident, or a massive stroke. Yet many of the apologist “fact checkers” and even some physicians have argued that those people would be alive today if they hadn’t had Covid and therefore any questioning of the severity of Covid is criminally irresponsible.

That such people would still be alive is in itself an amazing claim as even without Covid, large numbers of people are dying of those conditions every day. In December of 2020, during the peak of the last wave of Covid, about 80,000 people were dying each week in the U.S. However, even without Covid, about 65,000 people would have died of other causes in the same week.  In other words, over 80% of the deaths would have happened anyway. In no way do I wish to minimize the tragedy of any death, but I take serious objection to the use of such tragedies to promote deception.

Given that in the same period, it has been claimed that suicides alone exceeded the deaths attributable to Covid – suicides largely as a result of lockdown depression, even among elementary-age children, is it even correct to attribute all those so-called “excess deaths” solely to Covid? Likely many of them could more rightly be attributed to “confinementitis” or “lockdown fever” as much as they could to Covid. Even if the suicide rate did not exceed Covid rates, the fact that several people who committed suicide were isolated and depressed as a result of lockdowns is significant and should have been an avoidable factor.

Latrogenics refers to situations when a doctor’s treatment causes more harm than good. We perhaps need a similar term for harm caused by politicians.  Any good Greek scholars out there?

Add to that all those who had serious conditions but were afraid to seek medical assistance or treatment out of fear of contracting what so many “authorities” were portraying as a highly lethal disease, akin to smallpox or the Spanish Flu.  It is now well established that their reluctance often led to their death from lack of timely treatment. We have no idea of what were the real causes of those “excess deaths.”

Yes, some people actually died of Covid, often in terrible suffering, but all of them? Why did the CDC force the mandate that only acted to obscure the true cause of death? Was it simple incompetence and failure to think things through? Were they acting under a directive from others in authority above them? Were they misguided by public authority figures who were as ignorant as they were themselves, but who could speak with unwarranted, but convincing, confidence? We may never know.

Further, many, if not most, of the deaths were among the most elderly, among those who had already lived well beyond their life expectancy, and where mortality rates are already high. How many of these were confined in the Covid incubators known as nursing homes succumbed, especially when effective therapies were denied them because of political circumstances? How many of these, when confronted with isolation and denied the comforting presence of children and grandchildren and loved ones by the politically imposed lockdowns, simply gave up as having no motivation to continue?

How many deaths would have been attributed to Covid if we had not had the CDC mandate? Would there have been as much public concern about Covid if there were only 30,000 deaths instead of 500,000? Would we have ceded so much power to authorities if some other cause of death had been listed, with Covid simply a coincidental or contributing factor?

Is someone encouraging and exploiting fear of something unfamiliar and threatening in order to manipulate people?  Is the fear justified, or is it manufactured to serve another purpose? Would some groups have attained as much power, and others as much wealth, as they have if it were realized that death by Covid was more like death by chocolate? 

Would we have such a push to force questionable “vaccines” on an unwilling populace?

The question is now, as ever, “Cui Bono?”

War on the Middle Class

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , on October 8, 2021 by andelino

In the seven months “Fraud-In-Chief “ Joe Biden has been in the White House, America has changed, as evidenced by the border crises, the debacle in Afghanistan, and skyrocketing inflation. However, there has been one consistent theme to the current administration’s policies.

Justin Haskins wrote at the Hill: “Policymakers now seem more focused than ever on finding ways to get government funds into the hands of able-bodied middle-income earners—and middle-income Americans are gladly taking the bait.” There has been a deliberately engineered policy targeted at the middle class, especially over the past seven months.

While losing the wars abroad, Joe Biden has been waging a systematic war against middle-class America. This campaign of disaster is fulfilling Barack Obama’s vision to radically transform America. To complete the Communist takeover, the middle class needs to be dependent on the government.

The Communist Manifesto, by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, outlines the means by which a capitalist nation may become a Communist paradise. “The Communist Manifesto is considered the ‘sacred text’ of communism. It stresses the need for a total overthrow of existing governments.” Communism divides society into economic classes. The proletariat (working class) would rise up against the bourgeoisie (middle class) and the ruling class.

At its core, the manifesto attacks the right to own private property, which is one of the rights enshrined in the Constitution. It claims the bourgeoisie exploit the proletariat through collecting rent and owning businesses: “No sooner has the laborer received his wages in cash, then he is set upon by the other portions of the bourgeoisie, the landlord, the shopkeeper, the pawnbroker, etc.”

The middle class control the property and means of production that Communists need to create a dictatorship. They also stand in the way of the violent insurrection by the proletariat. The manifesto was written in 19th-century language. In modern America, the radical left consider the proletariat to be racial minorities and those dependent on the welfare state. The middle class are landlords, business owners and financially independent. Notice this chilling passage from The Communist Manifesto:

“You must, therefore, confess that by ‘individual” you mean no other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of property. This person must, indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible. Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labor of others by means of such appropriation.”

Marx and Engels believed for communism to become a reality, the middle class had to be swept out of the way! Communists believe taking away rights and freedoms is the path to equity, not tyranny.

Communists are “perverting our morals, sabotaging our educational system, wrecking our social structure, destroying our spiritual and religious life, weakening our industrial and economic power, demoralizing our armed forces, and finally, after such infiltration, overthrowing our government by force and violence! All this clearly disguised as a harmless political party! Communism is a worldwide psychological warfare!”

It is a matter of record that Communists have infiltrated our educational system. They are perverting our morals, destroying our spiritual and religious life, weakening our industrial and economic power, and demoralizing our armed forces. They have even gained control of the government through the radical left. And they are actively working to wreck our social structure: to destroy the middle class to amass property, wealth and the means of production so they can be centrally controlled.

The United States Senate recently passed a $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation bill. To fund this massive spending spree, Biden promised to not raise taxes on the middle class. However, that is already proving to be a lie. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg announced in March that to help fund the bill a mileage tax would be considered. The blogger Sundance at Conservative Treehouse commented:

“The middle class commutes to work much more than all other sectors. Any increase in gas prices, gasoline taxes or mileage taxes hits the blue-collar worker at a disproportionate rate. A proposal to install a mileage tax does nothing but add another cost onto the American middle class.”

President Donald Trump’s economist, Larry Kudlow, told Newsmax: “It’s going to be a minimum of $3 trillion in taxes, and the middle class is going to pay for that—virtually every nickel.” Biden has promised to increase corporate taxes to pay for the “human infrastructure” vision in the bill. However, most “corporate taxes” are actually paid by middle-class Americans.

Citing the Joint Committee on taxation, Kudlow said that about 70 percent of corporate taxes are paid by those who earn $500,000 or less. “And the bulk of that group,” Kudlow said, “is not $500,000; the bulk of that group is $50-$75,000 to $200,000, because that’s where the money is.”

These tax increases will come as crushing inflation sweeps across the nation. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that during July, the U.S. saw a 10 percent increase in food prices, 23 percent increase in energy prices, and 43 percent increase in the price of regular unleaded gasoline. These rocketing prices for necessary goods have decimated middle-class family incomes. Sundance wrote in another article:

“The White House responds to inflation by saying the Biden administration is attempting to directly subsidize the middle-class inflation they are creating by giving Americans money to pay for higher prices through covid bailouts. The White House solution is to create dependency on the government for income. This is exactly intended as government subsidies are used to keep the pitchforks at bay and simultaneously keep people dependent on government to sustain themselves expand the political base.”

That is the aim of the war on the middle class: create dependency on the welfare state. The U.S. government has given the middle class $1,400 stimulus checks, but inflation has raised the average expenses to double the stimulus amount. With the administration saying inflation will “slow down next year,” more stimulus checks will likely be on the way.

“Fraud-In-Chief” Biden has already approved a 25 percent increase to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits (previously known as food stamps). Forty-two million Americans—1 in every 8—rely on food stamps. SNAP is subsidized by taxpayers (including the middle class) and this will probably drive food inflation higher. Stephen Greene at PJ Media writes: “A 25 percent snap bump is just the beginning. As inflation grows, so too will demands for increased payouts for disability, Social Security and more assistance for anyone on a fixed income.”

The radical left has been baiting the middle class into this dependency trap for decades. In 2018, it was reported that 46.8 percent of government safety net payments were doled out to the middle class. What has been the root cause of this trend? CBS reported in 2018:

The culprit? In a term: health care. As costs of medical care have continued to march upward, the safety net has gotten bigger, modestly, to subsidize some of them. Medicaid expanded in the 1990’s and again under the Affordable Care Act, which also created subsidies for middle-income people to buy health insurance.

ObamaCare has been the main driver to making the middle class more dependent on the government safety net. Biden’s war on the middle class is only continuing Obama’s war on the middle class, but it has intensified in its ferocity.

What has exposed this intention most clearly is the unconstitutional extension of the eviction moratorium. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) extended the moratorium on August 4 in defiance of the Constitution and the ruling of the Supreme Court. This put millions of landowners in the difficult position of paying their mortgages while not collecting rent from tenants. Yet at the same time, 9 million jobs were available.

“Biden and the radical left are consolidating their power. They are weakening and bankrupting middle-class Americans, worsening the divisions in our society, and moving us away from the rule of law and toward the rule of whoever grabs power.”

The middle class makes up 52 percent of America’s population. By making the middle class poor, it will make them dependents of the state. By destroying land owners and landlords, the radical left targets those who have the means of resisting their agenda.

This plan has been carefully and meticulously prepared. On the surface, it can appear to be caused by incompetence, but it is deliberate. Who has been the architect of this war on the middle class? Barack Obama.

Barack Obama was a self-avowed Marxist in college. His administration tried to govern America like a Communist dictatorship as much as possible. Now his vice president is continuing his work by trying to crush middle-class landowners out of existence and create a huge lower class completely dependent on the government.

The final stage of the Communist plan is to control the “lower class.” This can either be accomplished through making the majority of Americans dependent on the government or, if necessary, through violence and social unrest.

The bottom line is the Communist campaign is to destroy economic independence.

Religious Exemptions

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , on October 7, 2021 by andelino

Religious exemptions, once used sparingly around the country to get exempted from various required vaccines, are becoming a much more widely used loophole against the mandated COVID-19 shot.

Christians all across America are right now scrambling for what’s known as a “religious exemption” which will allow them to not have to receive the COVID-19 vaccine injection based on their religious and spiritual beliefs. Christians think this a good thing, but hold on, this may be exactly what the government is hoping you will do.

“Then you will be handed over to be persecuted and put to death, and you will be hated by all nations because of me.” (Matthew 24:9)

Across all of the liberal media news outlets various commentators and pundits are calling for the unvaccinated to be removed from society, to be denied access to food, water, and emergency medical attention. At the highest levels of the American government, the order has already been given to start withholding life-saving medicine to people battling COVID. None of this is fear mongering or speculation, it is happening now.

Receiving a religious exemption tells the government that you identify with Jesus Christ, you are putting yourself on a hit list of your own making. When it comes time for the unvaccinated to be removed, Bill A416 would take “disease carriers” and place them in designated FEMA holding camps.

The Biden administration announced they would be drastically reducing the amount of life-saving monoclonal antibodies currently being sent to areas hard-hit by COVID-19. Such an act is tantamount to murder, just imagine if the medicine in question was something designed to treat heart attacks instead of COVID.

But this is only the beginning. If you refuse to be injected with the vaccine, unvaccinated Christians are rounded up and place in concentration camps located on Bill Gates 240,000 acres of farmland.

As COVID-19 vaccine mandates rise, religious exemptions grow and that’s a problem. An estimated 2,600 Los Angeles Police Department employees are citing religious objections to try to get out of the required COVID-19 vaccination. In Washington state, thousands of state workers are seeking similar exemptions. And in Arkansas, a hospital has been swamped with so many such requests from employees that it is apparently calling their bluff.

Religious objections, once used sparingly around the country to get exempted from various required vaccines, are becoming a much more widely used loophole against the COVID-19 shot. And it is only likely to grow following “Fraud-In-Chief” Joe Biden’s sweeping new vaccine mandates covering more than 100 million Americans, including executive branch employees and workers at businesses with more than 100 people on the payroll.

The administration acknowledges that a small minority of Americans will use, and in some cases, seek to exploit religious exemptions. But it said it believes even marginal improvements in vaccination rates will save lives. It is not clear how many federal employees have asked for a religious exemption, though union officials say there will be many requests.

The Labor Department has said an accommodation can be denied if it causes an undue burden on the employer. In the states, mask and vaccine requirements vary, but most offer exemptions for certain medical conditions or religious or philosophical objections. The use of such exemptions, particularly by parents on behalf of their schoolchildren, has been growing over the past decade.

The allowance was enshrined in the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, which says employers must make reasonable accommodations for employees who object to work requirements because of “sincerely held” religious beliefs.

A religious belief does not have to be recognized by an organized religion, and it can be new, unusual or “seem illogical or unreasonable to others,” according to rules laid out by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. But it can’t be founded solely on political or social ideas. That puts employers in the position of determining what is a legitimate religious belief and what is a dodge.

Many major religious denominations have no objections to the COVID-19 vaccines. But the rollout has prompted heated debates because of the longtime role that cell lines derived from fetal tissue have played, directly or indirectly, in the research and development of various vaccines and medicines.

Roman Catholic leaders in New Orleans and St. Louis went so far as to call Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 shot “morally compromised.” J&J has stressed that there is no fetal tissue in its vaccine. Moreover, the Vatican’s doctrine office has said it is “morally acceptable” for Catholics to receive COVID-19 vaccines that are based on research that used cells derived from aborted fetuses.

Even Pope Francis jumped on the band wagon and said it would be “suicide” not to get the shot, while he has been fully vaccinated with the Pfizer formula.

A reasonable argument for a religious exemption

The Conspiracy Theorists Were Right; It IS a “Poison-Death Shot”

Conscientious Objections to the COVID Vaccine Should Be Honored

China’s Attacks on Uyghurs

Posted in uncategorized with tags , on October 6, 2021 by andelino

This is a very sad reality that all of us need to wake up to.

China is intentionally reducing its population of Uyghur Muslims in a way that meets the criteria to be considered genocide, according to a report published in Central Asian Survey.

Adrian Zens, lead author of the report, released a bombshell paper in 2020 proving that Chinese Communist Party members are reducing the population of Uyghurs by forcing women of childbearing age to take unknown drugs and injections, undergo implantation of intrauterine contraceptive devices, or submit to surgical sterilization.

This is a central part of China’s mass internment campaign in Xinjiang, which has targeted almost 2 million Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities since 2017.

Zens’ new report builds on last year’s paper by analyzing troves of Chinese government documents as well as articles by leading academics in Xinjiang. Throughout these documents, he finds a prevailing narrative exposing the regime’s desire to, in its own words, “optimize Xinjiang’s ethnic population structure.” This “optimization” means slashing the number of Uyghur births in order to produce a regional population that is less religious and easier to absorb into China’s dominant Han population.

Zens says this goal comes directly from the top of the government, with the regime in Beijing “attaching great importance to the problem of Xinjiang’s population structure and population security.”

The new report also brings data together to provide a view of what the big-picture results of China’s policies in Xinjiang have been so far. Among the most disturbing findings is that in 2018, residents of the region underwent 243 sterilizations per 100,000 people. The enormity of this rate becomes clear when it is compared to the figure for the rest of China: only 33 per 100,000.

His team also found that by 2019, some 80 percent of women of childbearing age in southern Xinjiang had been forced to submit to “birth control measures with long-term effectiveness, including the placement of intrauterine devices or sterilization.”

The report shows that between 2015 and 2018, population growth rates plummeted by 84 percent in the two largest Uyghur prefectures. Population growth is slowing throughout China, but in Han-majority counties it declined by only 19.7 percent.

Zens argues that this long-term strategy is profoundly altering the demographics of Xinjiang. And if China’s war on Uyghurs continues, it will prevent up to 4.5 million births over the next two decades. “A smaller ethnic minority population will also be easier to police, control and assimilate,” he writes.

The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide defined genocide as including “imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group” if they are “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethical, racial or religious group, as such.”

The Communist Party’s forced sterilizations aiming to “optimize” Xinjiang’s population are designed to reduce the number of Uyghurs and thereby destroy part of this ethnic group. Clearly, China is committing slow-motion genocide.

Zens told Newsweek that it would be “highly appropriate” for the United States and other signatories to the 1948 genocide convention to boycott the 2022 Olympics in Beijing. “But this is not enough,” he said. The countries “have a treaty obligation to prevent genocide,” which means “they need to enact further and coordinated measures.” He added: “This is a very sad reality that all of us need to wake up to.”

The genocide underway in Xinjiang shows that the Chinese Communist Party will stop at nothing to continue amassing might, neutralizing opposition, and making its power absolute. And Zens is correct that it constitutes a reality that the world needs to wake up to. This reality points to a shift into a new global era.

This means the genocidal horrors now happening under the Chinese Communist Party in Xinjiang are only the start. As we watch the Chinese grow increasingly brutal in Xinjiang, as well as in locations such as Tibet and Hong Kong, we see a preview of just how tumultuous the times of the Gentiles will be in the future.

We are now only in the “outer edges” of this new era. But soon these times will be fully realized and the kind of barbarity that is now happening in remote parts of China will occur worldwide.

It will surely be a “catastrophic storm.”

Why should the West condemn China’s harsh treatment of its Uighur Muslims when the Islamic world is actively collaborating with China’s global campaign against the Uighurs?

EX-MUSLIM warns Muslims and Muslim apologists to stop ‘boohooing’ about China’s oppression of its Uighur Muslim population

16 MUSLIM COUNTRIES are NOT opposed to China’s crackdown on Islam and the detainment and re-education camps for some one million Uighur Muslims

Once again, the New York Times’ so-called “bombshell” about China’s training camps for Uighur Muslims is a big nothing burger

In its war against Islamic extremism, the Chinese government has systematically destroyed 16,000 mosques in Xinjiang since 2017

CHINA: Turning Uighur Muslims with extremist ideas into model Chinese citizens

WAY TO GO! CHINA smashes 181 Uighur Muslim gangs in anti-terrorism crackdown In Xinjiang

China orders Muslim shops to sell alcohol and cigarettes to undermine and weaken the influence of Islam in China

JUSTICE SERVED! The West would be wise to follow China’s swift system of justice for Muslim terrorists

CHINA BANS RAMADAN to punish Uighur Muslims for perpetrating so many terrorist attacks on the country during the past few years

China BANS all Muslim prayer meetings and Islamic religious practices in government buildings, schools, and business offices in Xinjiang

CHINA COUNTER TERRORISM 101: Why China has less trouble from Muslim terrorists than most of the world

CHINA: Six dead in yet another ‘sudden jihad’ stabbing attack by Uighur Muslims

CHINA deports Uighur Muslims from Yunnan province back to the Islamic ghetto of Xinjiang following deadly knife jihad attacks at the Kunming station

CHINA: ‘Another’ knife jihad attack by Uighur Muslims?

COVER-UP: Chinese Uighur MUSLIM rioters burned bus passengers alive, raped women and decapitated children, displaying their heads on a highway median

CHINA: Uighur Muslims stirring up trouble again – 20 killed

As bad as China is, they do get it right when it comes to preventing a population explosion of Muslims

Edmund Burke (1729-1787)

Posted in uncategorized with tags , on October 5, 2021 by andelino

Edmund Burke was an Irish-born philosopher and statesman of the 18th century. These quotes have aged well and are perfectly applicable to the current truth.

“In a democracy, the majority of the citizens is capable of exercising the most cruel oppression upon the minority.”

“You will smile here at the consistency of those democratists who—when they are not on their guard—treat the humbler part of the community with the greatest contempt whilst at the same time they pretend to make them the depositories of all power.”

“It is a general popular error to suppose the loudest complainers for the public to be the most anxious for its welfare.”

“Despots govern by terror. They know that he who fears God fears nothing else; and therefore they eradicate from the mind, through their Voltaire, their Helvetius, and the rest of that infamous gang, that only sort of fear which generates true courage.”

“Those who have been once intoxicated with power, and have derived any kind of emolument from it—even though but for one year—never can willingly abandon it. They may be distressed in the midst of all their power but they will never look to anything but power for their relief.”

“The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse.”

“The essence of tyranny is the enforcement of stupid laws.”

“The great difference between the real leader and the pretender is that the [real leader] sees into the future, while the [pretender] regards only the present; the [pretender] lives by the day, and acts upon expediency; the [real leader] acts on enduring principles and for the immortality.”

“A coward’s courage is in his tongue.”

“They defend their errors as if they were defending their inheritance.”

“Nothing turns out to be so oppressive and unjust as a feeble government.”

“Hypocrisy can afford to be magnificent in its promises, for never intending to go beyond promise, it costs nothing.”

“A great empire and little minds go ill together.”

“This sort of people are so taken up with their theories about the rights of man that they have totally forgotten his nature.”

“All men have equal rights, but not to equal things.”

“By gnawing through a dike, even a rat may drown a nation.”

“People crushed by law have no hopes but from power. If laws are their enemies, they will be enemies to laws; and those who have much hope and nothing to lose will always be dangerous.”

“Liberty does not exist in the absence of morality.”

“The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.”

“To read without reflecting is like eating without digesting.”

“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.  They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be cured against one’s will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.” C. S. Lewis

%d bloggers like this: