White Privilege Conference

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , on April 17, 2014 by andelino

White Privilege Conference 00The “White Privilege Conference” (WPC) aims to create a “learning” community in which participants “engage” in a challenging educational experience as “respectful” community members.

The views expressed by “facilitators and speakers” at the conference do not necessarily “reflect” the views of the WPC and conference organizers.

Each participant is in a “different” place with regard to their journey in understanding “white supremacy, whiteness, privilege, power and oppression.”

Thus, we ask that each participant share “responsibility” for holding themselves “accountable” to this community agreement that will allow for a “shared” experience that fosters the opportunity for “understanding, respecting and connecting.”

General Information, WPC Glossary Key Terms, Conference Schedule and Topics can be found at the pdf. link “White Privilege Conference”. Please note: Gender “neutral” restrooms are available that are not labeled “men” and “women” and are provided for those conference participants that opt out of a “gender binary system.”

The 15th “White Privilege Conference” just concluded in Madison, Wisconsin teaching educators “white people can’t be cured of racism”:

What Can Educators do to End White Supremacy in the Classroom?

White Privilege Conference 02The best you can “hope” for is the following quote from facilitator Kim Radersma, a “white” former high school English teacher:

“Being a white person who does anti-racist work is like being an alcoholic. I will never be recovered by my alcoholism, to use the metaphor,” Radersma said.

“I have to everyday wake up and acknowledge that I am so deeply imbedded with racist thoughts and notions and actions in my body that I have to choose everyday to do anti-racist work and think in an anti-racist way.”

She continued that “until” white people admit they “have a problem,” they will not be “able” to fight against “white” privilege.

“We’ve been raised to be good. ‘I’m a good white person,’ and yet to realize I carry within me these dark, horrible thoughts and perceptions is hard to admit. And yet like the alcoholic, what’s the first step? Admitting you have a problem,” she told the session attendees.

Let me put this in plain English.

Kim Radersma, a white woman who admits having “dark, horrible thoughts and perceptions”, claims all whites are “racist” and therefore unable to “effectively” teach non-whites. If she really believes this, then why doesn’t she see that her “theory” itself, by definition, is “ultimate racist” in nature?

Radersma is a strong proponent of political “ideology” being infused into education as well. Later in her speech she explained that “If you don’t want to work for equity, get the fuck out of education.”

“If you are not serious about being an agent of change that helps stifle the oppressive systems, go find another job. Because you are a political figure.”

The Longer You are in the Tea Party, the More Racist You Become

White Privilege Conference 04“Not only are all members of the Tea Party movement racists, but the longer a person associates with the Tea Party, the more racist he becomes” according to Leonard Zeskind, an author and activist, hosting a session on the “racist roots” of the Teat Party.

In Zeskind’s view, the oppression of minorities is a central motivating principal of the Tea Party. “There has been a longitudinal study that finds the longer you are in the Tea Party, the more racist you become.”

Tea Party groups are similar to “white nationalist” groups, he said. “Is it racist?” he asked. He then answered his own question: “Yes.”

Zeskind denounced other “racists” as well. People who send their kids to “private schools” are also racists. People who “disagree” with President Obama are also racists.

White Privilege Conference 01Not to be outdone by the other speakers, Niger Innis, national spokesman for the Congress of Racial Equality, “denounced” the White Privilege Conference, calling it “The White Money Conference” for being “frivolous, irrelevant and a waste of taxpayer money.”

Not to mention the convention does nothing to address the real “needs and concerns” of struggling “minorities,” Innis told Wisconsin Reporter.

Innis doesn’t have a problem with the conference’s “progressive” organizers inviting thousands of teachers, university faculty, activists, government employees and students to discuss the “evils of Western Civilization and white people” so long as they are prepared to “pay for it” themselves.

Let’s face it, to be an authentically “black” person you must live up to and demonstrate all the “stereotypes” that blacks complain about.

For example, let’s look at Barack Hussein Obama who is such an “Agent of Change.”

Stupid? yes. Lazy? yes. Corrupt? yes. A Liar? yes. Blames others for his own screw-ups? yes. Shirks personal responsibility? yes. Sense of entitlement? Yes. Pack of Kool Menthols? yes. Basketball? yes. Golf? Yes. Questionable education? yes.

Ebony 02

He is the “all time” black Master at “ferreting” out all the “racist” white men in America.

I would think that people around the world could “learn” much from this, but as they taught at the conference, it is “hopeless if you are white!”

Allah Hates Women

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on April 17, 2014 by andelino

Allah hates Women 05The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) concluded their 192nd meeting with the ruling that “women are un-Islamic” and that their mere “existence” contradicted “Sharia and the will of Allah.”

Chairman Maulana Muhammad Khan Shirani noted that “women by existing defied the laws of nature, and to protect Islam and the Sharia women should be forced to stop existing as soon as possible.”

The announcement comes a couple of days after CII’s 191st meeting where they “dubbed” laws related to “minimum marriage age” to be un-Islamic.

After declaring “women to be un-Islamic,” Shirani explained that there were actually two kinds of women – “haraam and makrooh.”

We can divide all women in the world into two distinct categories: those who are “haraam” and those who are “makrooh.”

“Now the difference between haraam and makrooh is that the former is categorically forbidden while the latter is really disliked,” Shirani said.

Allah hates Women 03“He further went on to explain how the women around the world can ensure that they get promoted to being makrooh, from just being downright haraam.

Any woman that exercises her will is haraam, absolutely haraam, and is conspiring against Islam and the Ummah, whereas those women who are totally subservient can reach the status of being makrooh.

Such is the generosity of our ideology and such is the endeavor of Muslim men like us who are the true torchbearers of gender equality,” the CII chairman added.

Officials told Khabaristan Today that the council members deliberated over various “historic references related to women” and concluded that each woman is a source of “fitna” and a perpetual “enemy” of Islam.

They also decided that by “restricting” them to their subordinate, bordering on “slave” status, the “momineen” and the “mujaheddin” can ensure that Islam continues to be the religion of “peace, prosperity and gender equality.”

Responding to a question one of the officials said that international standards of “gender equality” should not be used if they “contradict” Islam or the “constitution” of Pakistan that had incorporated Islam and had given “sovereignty” to Allah.

“We don’t believe in western ideals, and nothing that contradicts Islam should ever be paid heed. In any case by giving women the higher status of being makrooh, it’s us Muslims who have paved the way for true, Sharia compliant feminism,” the official said.

The CII meeting also advised the government that to protect Islam “women’s right to breathe” should also be taken away from them.

“Whether a woman is allowed to breathe or not be left up to her husband or male guardian, and no woman under any circumstance whatsoever should be allowed to decide whether she can breathe or not,” Shirani said.

Allah hates Women 01

Muslim girls being “lead off in chains” to meet their new husbands.

The leading experts in Islamic Law met recently at the 191st meeting of the Council of Islamic Ideology and declared as “un-Islamic any laws attempting to establish a minimum age for girls to be married.”

Allah hates Women 04

In Islam, a woman is viewed merely as a “repository of sexual organs.” A woman has “ten” private parts. When she gets married, her husband covers “one” private part; when she dies the grave covers the other “nine” private parts.

There is nothing left to add…except why did Allah “create” women in the first place?

Muslims are “completely and utterly” brain dead, they are so against “gay” people that they “hang” them as soon as they find any, yet their so called god Allah has said the “existence of women is against his will.”

If that was the case, then all Muslims men should be “gay” because if Allah is against the “existence” of women, then he must have “intended” that all Muslim men to be “gay” and should “sleep with a man” and not women.

Muslim Gay Sex

And if that is the case, then why are Muslim men “ignoring” what Allah intended, and marrying women and “procreate” bringing even more “hated” women in to the world?

And why are there so many Muslims who are “raping” underage girls and “passing” them around their family and friends, when Allah is so “against” the female existence?

It’s obvious, Muslims have no idea what law’s they should be following. It’s no wonder they are all “raving mad and foaming at the mouth” when you see them protesting in the streets.

Allah hates Women 02

I think the only “way out” for all Muslim men is to “hang themselves for being gay” for not listening to their “false” god Allah, who “hates” all women.

Islam Death Cult

Go on, you Islamic “morons” and do us all a favor.

Stone Homos 05

Allah Hates all Women
Islamic Voodoos
Honor Dairies

Purge the Bigots

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on April 16, 2014 by andelino

Purge the Bigots 00

Purge the Bigots
By: William Saletan

Brendan Eich is gone.

The creator of JavaScript and co-founder of Mozilla.org has quit as Mozilla’s CEO, forced out by the uproar over a donation he made six years ago to a ballot measure against gay marriage. There’s no record of Eich discriminating against gay employees—“I never saw any kind of behavior or attitude from him that was not in line with Mozilla’s values of inclusiveness,” says the company’s chairwoman, Mitchell Baker.

In fact, last week, Eich pledged, I am committed to ensuring that Mozilla is, and will remain, a place that includes and supports everyone, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, age, race, ethnicity, economic status, or religion.

You will see exemplary behavior from me toward everyone in our community, no matter who they are; and the same toward all those whom we hope will join, and for those who use our products. Mozilla’s inclusive health benefits policies will not regress in any way. And I will not tolerate behavior among community members that violates our Community Participation Guidelines or (for employees) our inclusive and non-discriminatory employment policies.

But that wasn’t enough. A revolt among Mozilla staffers, compounded by pressure from software developers, outrage on Twitter and a boycott movement spearheaded by “OkCupid”, has driven Eich out. Baker, having accepted Eich’s resignation, offers this apology: “We know why people are hurt and angry, and they are right: it’s because we haven’t stayed true to ourselves.”

Some of my colleagues are celebrating. They call Eich a bigot who got what he deserved. I agree. But let’s not stop here. If we’re serious about enforcing the new standard, thousands of other employees who donated to the same anti-gay ballot measure must be punished.

More than 35,000 people gave money to the campaign for Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot measure that declared, “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” You can download the entire list, via the Los Angeles Times, as a compressed spreadsheet. (Click the link that says, “Download CSV.”) Each row lists the donor’s employer. If you organize the data by company, you can add up the total number of donors and dollars that came from people associated with that company.

The first thing you’ll notice, if you search for Eich, is that he’s the only Mozilla employee who gave to the campaign for Prop 8. His $1,000 was more than canceled out by three Mozilla employees who donated to the other side.

The next thing you’ll notice is that other companies, including other tech firms, substantially outscored Mozilla in pro-Prop 8 contributions attributed to their employees. That includes Adobe, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Oracle, Sun Microsystems, and Yahoo, as well as Disney, DreamWorks, Gap, and Warner Bros.

Thirty-seven companies in the database are linked to more than 1,300 employees who gave nearly $1 million in combined contributions to the campaign for Prop 8. Twenty-five tech companies are linked to 435 employees who gave more than $300,000. Many of these employees gave $1,000 apiece, if not more. Some, like Eich, are probably senior executives.

Why do these bigots still have jobs? Let’s go get them.

To organize the next stage of the purge, I’ve compiled the financial data into three tables. Here’s the first table. It shows 37 companies whose names, in one form or another, appear next to a total of at least $10,000 (per company) in donations to Prop 8. The list isn’t complete, but it’s a start.

Purge the Bigots 02

The next table, below, shows 25 tech companies whose employees donated to the campaign for Prop 8. Again, the list isn’t exhaustive. But every one of these companies outscored Mozilla in associated contributions to Prop 8.

Purge the Bigots 03

The last table, below, shows several other companies that didn’t hit the $10,000 threshold but did surpass Mozilla in money for Prop 8. Some of them might surprise you.

Purge the Bigots 04

The numbers in these tables don’t represent contributions from the companies. (All the money came from individuals.) Nor do they reflect the balance of contributions that came from a company’s employees. (I haven’t added up the donations that went to the campaign against Prop 8.) A quick glance here and there suggests that in many cases, the balance of contributions from these companies went against the ballot measure.

But those caveats are true of Mozilla, too. And we’re not cutting Mozilla any slack, are we?

If we’re serious about taking down corporate officers who supported Proposition 8, and boycotting employers who promote them, we’d better get cracking on the rest of the list.

Otherwise, perhaps we should put down the pitchforks.

Purge the Bigots 05

Brendan Eich won’t be the last “scalp” collected on behalf of “homosexual” militants.

This isn’t about a “tiny” percentage of “gay” Americans promoting “homosexuality” as an end in itself.

This is a major battle in the “Cultural Marxist” war to replace America with a country where no thought crime, as defined by “ultra-Left oligarchs,” will be tolerated.

As anyone can see, “anonymity” is no longer an option. Neither is “sitting” on the sidelines. Either we fight these “vermin”, or they win. If they win there will be “zero tolerance” for anyone they deem to be “ideologically incorrect”, as they have clearly demonstrated.

The Astonishing Conservative Hypocrisy Over Mozilla and the First Amendment
We Shouldn’t Forgive Brendan Eich for His Homophobic Past Yet
If You’re Against Gay Marriage, You’re a Bad CEO

Watermelon Secrets

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on April 16, 2014 by andelino

Watermelon Secrets 01

Watermelon reduces “high blood pressure” in overweight people and could slash the “risk of a heart attack,” new research shows.

Scientists found that the fruit significantly “reduces” blood pressure in overweight people, even when they are “exposed” to cold weather.

More people die of heart attacks in “cold conditions” because the stress put on the body by trying to keep warm causes “blood pressure” to increase.

This forces the heart to “work” harder, meaning people face a higher risk of “heart attacks and strokes.”

The study, published in the American Journal of Hypertension, revealed that “eating watermelon” is good for heart health and can “reduce” the risk of heart problems in cold conditions.

Watermelon Secrets 02

Reduces blood pressure and cardiac stress

Professor Arturo Figueroa, from Florida State University, said: “The pressure on the aorta and on the heart decreased after consuming watermelon extract.”

Scientists looked at 13 middle-aged “obese men and women” who suffered from “high blood pressure” over a 12 week period.

Test participants’ hands were “dipped” into cold water to simulate cold weather conditions, while scientists took their “blood pressure.”

Then, every day half of the participants took “watermelon extracts” – four grams of amino acid L-citrulline and two grams of L-arginine per day.

The other half were given a “placebo”, and after six weeks the participants “switched” roles.

It was revealed that watermelon lowered “blood pressure and reduced cardiac stress”, even in cold conditions.

“That means less overload to the heart, so the heart is going to work easily during a stressful situation such as cold exposure,” said Professor Figueroa.

L-citrulline and L-arginine “supplements” are available from some health food shops but would have to be taken in “high doses” to reduce blood pressure.

Watermelon Secrets 02

The news comes just after it was “revealed” that working out in “warm water” can reduce blood pressure.

Researchers at the University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, found “aquarobics” in warm water can lower “blood pressure” even in people for whom medication has not worked.

It’s not clear why “warm” water has this effect. One theory is that “heat” dilates blood vessels, improving the “flow” of blood through the body.

African-Americans are at higher risks for high blood pressure, heart attacks or heart diseases, obesity and poor diet-related nutrition.

Maybe this scientific research explains the “high level of consumption” in the black community of these juicy sweet and refreshing watermelons.

Watermelon Secrets 04

To defeat “racism” the Jamaican bobsled team wore watermelons helmets in Sochi finishing in 30th place. That means the “watermelons” got last “seed.”

Hungry Buddy

 Watermelon Secrets 01

Fort Hood, Part II

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on April 15, 2014 by andelino

Fort Hood, Part II 02

Well, here we go again.

Another “Gun Free” zone. Another “mass” shooting. And this one’s “even a repeat!”

President Obama was briefly “interrupted” by the Fort Hood shooting while “engaged” in  several fundraisers, stating his “heartbrokenness”, raising a glass in “honor of the fallen” and immediately went back to fundraising events for the Democratic Party.

Fort Hood, Part II 01

After his “toast” Obama went ahead to the Chicago “Cut Steakhouse” for a meeting with twenty-five supporters, who “paid up to” $32,400 each to have “dinner” with the President.

By 7:00 p.m. Obama attended his “third” fundraiser, a reception at a private Chicago residence, where fifty-five supporters “paid” $10,000 each to just “meet” with him.

At this event, Obama told attendees of the Fort Hood shooting, “We’re monitoring the situation carefully” and that he was “going to get to bottom of exactly what happened.”

The President then explained he was in the middle of a political “campaign” despite his 2012 reelection. He said that he told his wife Michelle that the 2012 presidential election was his final campaign, but “actually, this one for the 2014 midterms is my last one.”

Because nothing gets your mind off a “heartbreak” like raising “money” so you can stay in “power.”

Fortunately, the “casualties” are merely military personnel, who quite rightly aren’t allowed to “carry weapons” on military bases and whose lives are, well, obviously not “worth all that much” anyway.

Fort Hood, Part II 03

Ivan Lopez, identified by authorities as the “soldier who opened fire” at Fort Hood purchased his handgun off base and “smuggled” it into the gun-free zone to “commit his crime,” according to a military officer.

During a nighttime press conference Lt. General Mark Milley said the soldier used a .45 caliber Smith & Wesson handgun. If brought onto the base the gun was supposed to be “registered on the base,” however, Milley said, “this gun was not registered.”

Milley explained that the gunman was “approached” by a female officer after the shooting. He then pulled out the gun, which was “concealed” under his clothing, and took his own life.

Army Secretary John McHugh said the soldier saw “no combat” during a four-month deployment to Iraq as a truck driver from August to December 2011.

The soldier saw a psychiatrist last month and showed no “sign of any likely violence either to himself or others,” McHugh said. His record shows “no involvement with extremist organizations of any kind.”

I guess this means the shooter wasn’t a “terrorist,” but once again, “one of our own.” 

An unidentified reporter asked about “rules” regarding carrying concealed guns on base; Milley replied that carrying “concealed guns” was not allowed.

Another reporter asked if this “heinous crime” might lead to a “change in policy” so that soldiers on a military base can be “armed to defend” themselves.

Milley did not indicate any “support” for changing the “gun-free zone” policy.

He did show interest, however, in “re-evaluating” the way cars are “searched at the entry gate” so that guns might not be “smuggled” in as easily.

Workplace violence is to be expected. After all, most of these people on military bases are “knuckle dragging” tea baggers, are they not?

If they had “access to guns” while on base, can you just imagine how “scary” that would be?

Right here on “American” soil?

Fort Hood, Part II 04

Not too long ago I remember that the last time “four” Americans were killed, our Commander-in-Chief  described it as “bumps in the road”  and then Secretary of State announced the official policy “at this point, what difference does it make?”

Hillary's Accomplishments 02

I am wondering if something is different this time.

LPGA Stars Backlash

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , on April 15, 2014 by andelino

Golf Digest 08Maxim model Paulina Gretzky who gained visibility by posting provocative selfies on social media, will be the cover girl in the upcoming issue of Golf Digest.

That apparently didn’t sit well and irked” some players on the LPGA Tour.

Paulina isn’t a “professional” golfer but is “engaged” to one, PGA Tour star Dustin Johnson.

Gretzky, the daughter of hockey icon Wayne Gretzky and former actress Janet Jones Gretzky, demonstrates six golf improvement “fitness exercises” for the issue and talks about how she once missed the ball in front of 30 people while playing in her dad’s tournament and her connections in the sports world.

The last three women to appear on the cover have been Golf Channel anchor and personality Holly Sonders (May 2013), Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue cover girl Kate Upton, who appeared with Arnold Palmer (December 2013), and Gretzky. Lorena Ochoa was the last player to appear on the cover in 2008.

Golf Digest 02“That’s just been the way it is for over 20, 30 years,” world No. 1 Inbee Park told reporters on Thursday after her round in the Kraft Nabisco Championship.

“We are trying to get closer to the guys (in popularity), but obviously we are never going to get there. That’s for sure. The LPGA is getting better and better.”

Golf Digest 03Stacy Lewis, the top-ranked American at No. 3 in the world, was asked by a New York Times reporter what she thought of the choice.

“It’s frustrating for female golfers,” Lewis told reporters.

“It’s the state of where we’ve always been. We don’t get the respect for being the golfers we are. Obviously, Golf Digest is trying to sell magazines, but at the same time you like to see a little respect for the women’s game.”

Golf Digest 05Seven-time major winner Juli Inkster seemed to feel the same way.

“It’s frustrating because it’s Golf Digest; it’s not Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue. I think they should maybe recognize some of the great women golfers that we have.” “O.K., so I think next month the cover should be Paula Creamer’s fiancé, who’s a fighter pilot, or Brittany Lincicome’s hot boyfriend, who’s a long-drive hitter. Put one of them on there.”

Golf Digest 06Angela Stanford agreed. The veteran from Texas has been playing golf on a professional level since 1990 but wasn’t surprised when told of the Gretzky cover.

“The question is who are they trying to sell to?” Stanford said.

“If the answer is men 25 years old through 45 years old, then I guess that’s what they have to do. You know the old saying, sex sells. And nobody can argue with that. It’s just the way it is. But the LPGA has some attractive women and very fit women, so why not use them? I’m just baffled by it.”

Gretzky’s appearance will be the 21st time a woman has appeared on the cover since the magazine started printing in 1950. The first women to appear on the cover were on an issue in 1969.

Since then, players such as Jane Blalock (three times), Nancy Lopez (three times), Annika Sorenstam, Lorena Ochoa, Juli Inkster and Se Ri Pak have been on the cover.

“Sports figures, celebrities and models have appeared on Golf Digest covers since the magazine’s beginning. Paulina ranks at the high end of the golf celebrity scene today, and she has a compelling story to tell,” editor in chief Jerry Tarde said in a statement.

“She also might get some new people interested in the game.”

Golf Digest 01

It’s a shame that “nature” didn’t see fit to give above ladies the same “body physics and beauty looks” as Paulina Gretzky, but that’s the way genetic “sperms” travel.

It sounds like “sour grapes” to suggest that Paulina being on the cover Golf Digest somehow “disrespects” women golfers.

“Athletic golfing ability and talent” has very little to do with “stunning good looks, rare confluence of beauty and charisma.”

I also would like to “make” the Golf Digest cover as a PGA tour golfer but unfortunately neither do I have the “talent of being a scratch golfer” nor do I have the good looks of a “luscious, muscle hunk” like Dustin Johnson.

Guess what? I “suck” it up and “accept” it. You don’t hear me “whining” about it. It’s all part of “who” I am.

Golf Digest 07

Stacy herself stated that “sex” sells. And she isn’t exactly the most “sexy” women on tour. There are many others female golfers who “deserve” that accolade.

Do these “whining” LPGA players understand that Golf Digest is in the “business of selling magazines?” And that nothing sells magazines more “effectively” than putting a “smoking” hot chick on the front? That’s advertising 101 stuff.

Magazine covers aren’t participation “trophies” you get just because you’re a “good” lady golfer. They’re the “domain” of the hot and sexy. People buy them because covers are “attractive” with interesting “story” content.

Golf Digest isn’t going to “keep the lights on” and the shareholders happy by putting “big, fat, ugly people” on the cover.

Holly Sonders isn’t on the Golf Channel because she’s a “great” golfer.

She’s on there because she has “smarts, can speak articulate, has great sport knowledge/insights and good looks.” It generates ratings.

Golf Digest 00

I can “guarantee” this will be one of the higher selling “Golf Digest” issue.

These LPGA players are just “frustrated” that Paulina is a billion times “hotter” than they are and getting all of this attention.

It has nothing to do with “women golfers getting respect.”

Let’s roll the Paulina portfolio…

Paulina Gretzky 02

Paulina Gretzky 03

Paulina Gretzky 05

Paulina Gretzky 06

Paulina Gretzky 043

Black History

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on April 14, 2014 by andelino

Black_History 04
Obama, the nation’s first black president, spoke in deeply personal terms of how civil and voting rights protections — “as well as government assistance programs “— had paved the way for his own successes.

And he “blasted” those critical of the role of the government in “broadening prosperity for all those who strived for it.”

“We are here today because we know we cannot be complacent, for history travels not only forwards, history can travel backwards,” Obama said.

“History can travel sideways. And securing the gains this country has made requires the vigilance of its citizens. Our rights, our freedoms — they are not given. They must be won. They must be nurtured through struggle and discipline and persistence and faith.”

“Ours, in the end, is a story of optimism, a story of achievement and constant striving that is unique upon this Earth,” Obama said. “He knew because he had lived that story. … And in part because of him, we must believe it as well.”

History 01

I didn’t knew Obama was working on a “time travel machine.”

Common Core Principle #109: “History travels forward, backwards and sideways.”


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 115 other followers