Archive for wuhan virus

Intelligence Report

Posted in uncategorized with tags , on November 29, 2021 by andelino

The first human infection with covid-19 was most likely the result of a laboratory associated incident.” So says an August 27 report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. When the pandemic began, the origins of the disease were shrouded in mystery. Most pointed to a Wuhan wet market as the place where an animal virus made the jump and first infected a human.

But over the last several months, there has been an avalanche of evidence that the pandemic was created in a test tube. Now, even the left-leaning federal intelligence agencies are changing their tune. According to the report, four agencies and the National Intelligence Council assert low confidence that the coronavirus originated from animals. Other agencies did not make an assessment either way.

Read more at Intelligence Report on Wuhan Lab Leak Exposes Deceitful Media

FakeBook Censorship

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , on June 8, 2021 by andelino

Comrade Citizens, the magnanimous leader of FakeBook has decided to allow the previously censored discussion to take place. Big Technocracy has given permission to the U.S. media to write investigative articles about COVID-19 originating from the Wuhan weapons lab.

WASHINGTON  – Facebook will no longer take down posts claiming that Covid-19 was man-made or manufactured, a company spokesperson told POLITICO on Wednesday, a move that acknowledges the renewed debate about the virus’ origins.

A narrative in flux: Facebook’s policy tweak arrives as support surges in Washington for a fuller investigation into the origins of Covid-19 after the Wall Street Journal reported that three scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were hospitalized in late 2019 with symptoms consistent with the virus.

The findings have reinvigorated the debate about the so-called Wuhan lab-leak theory, once dismissed as a fringe conspiracy theory. (read more)

Please remember to thank Dear Leader Mark Zuckerberg for his decision to allow conversational debate on FakeBook.  However, also remember your responsibilities as good citizens to remain compliant to the topics that are permitted, and do not stray into conversations that are not approved by the technocratic command and control authority.

Virus as Bioweapons

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on June 4, 2021 by andelino

I have long believed, based on a lifelong study of Communist China and my background in biology, that the China Virus was a laboratory construct.  At best, as I wrote in the New York Post, it was the result of a reckless “Gain of Function” experiment that created a highly contagious pathogen that somehow escaped from the lab.  

At worst, it was a deliberate attempt by the Chinese military to genetically engineer a bioweapons that could be used to attack China’s enemies, chiefly the United States and India.

Until recently, merely hinting at either possibility was enough to get you banned from social media and dismissed by the mainstream media as a paranoid crank. In fact, that’s exactly what Facebook did, quickly suppressing my column as “False Information.”  

It took a couple of months to convince the 20-something “fact checkers” who work there that there was more to the story of the Wuhan Flu than someone getting a bad bowl of bat soup. After all, there were scientific publications proving that China was engaged in dangerous “Gain of Function” research along with evidence that it had an active bioweapons program.   

As the old joke goes, it’s not paranoia if they’re really out to get you. And, as I have described at length in my book, “Bully of Asia”, the Chinese Communist Party really is out to get us.   

It doesn’t require much in the way of a leap of the imagination to anticipate that the same murderous regime that has brought us forced abortion and sterilization, forced organ harvesting, and genocide in real time would also be developing deadly bioweapons to release upon the world.  

And we now know that China’s military strategists were planning to do just that.  

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) has just uncovered a Chinese book that proves that Chinese military scientists have been working towards the development of a “new era of genetic weapons.” These weapons, the Chinese scientists promised, could be “artificially manipulated into an emerging human disease virus, then weaponized and unleashed.”

In the 2015 volume, called “The Unnatural Origin of SARS and New Species of Man-Made Viruses as Genetic Bioweapons”,  the Chinese military scientists begin by suggesting that World War III would be fought with biological weapons. 

And not just any bioweapons. Corona viruses, a number of which cause respiratory illnesses in people, were mentioned as a class of viruses that could be readily weaponized. Indeed, the Chinese scientists were even more explicit, pointing out in their paper that the coronavirus that causes Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, or SARS, was an ideal candidate for a bioweapons. 

I do not think that it is any accident that the China Virus – or COVID-19 as the World Health Organization insists that we call it – is a type of SARS virus. Now you understand why Peter Jennings, the executive director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), described the new document as the closest thing to a “smoking gun as we’ve got.”  

News.com.au quoted Jennings as saying that “I think this is significant because it clearly shows that Chinese scientists were thinking about military application for different strains of the coronavirus and thinking about how it could be deployed. It begins to firm up the possibility that what we have here [in the China Virus] is the accidental release of a pathogen for military use.”

Jennings also believes, as I do, that the China Virus’s origins as a bioweapons explain why China has blocked investigations. “If this was a case of transmission from a wet market it would be in China’s interest to co-operate,” Jennings pointed out. “We’ve had the opposite of that.”

Indeed, we’ve had a full-blown cover up, which continues to the present day. As former Deputy National Security Advisor (DNSA) Mathew Pottinger pointed out in a February interview., U.S. intelligence believed that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) had been “doing secret classified animal experiments in that same laboratory Wuhan Institute of Virology” as early as 2017.

He added that there is “good reason to believe” that an outbreak of a “flu-like illness” had occurred among the scientists in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in the fall of 2019, just before the first cases of a new type of pneumonia were being reported in Wuhan.

While the Wuhan lab poses as a “civilian institution,” Pottinger said, U.S. intelligence has determined that the lab has collaborated on publications and secret bioweapons projects with China’s military. 

Pottinger also noted, as I did in my February 2020 article, one final – and very telling – point: “when the outbreak in Wuhan began it was the Chinese military, and not the Chinese CDC, that was called in to handle the situation.”

This is exactly what you would expect to happen if the China Virus was a product of a military bioweapons program.

No one currently serving in the Biden administration has been willing to go quite this far. But even they have begun to backtrack from the “bat soup” story of late. Biden’s Director of National Intelligence, Avril Haines, recently admitted that one of the two possible explanations for the origin of COVID-19 would involve an “escape” from a Chinese bio lab in Wuhan. 

Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that, where the CCP is concerned, America should “distrust and verify.”  China’s official explanation is clearly a fabrication.  

More and more evidence suggests that the China Virus was indeed a bioweapons that was deliberately released upon the world. 

Emails between WHO, NIH, and Fauci reveal Chinese influence on COVID response

Is The Cure Killing Us?

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on May 28, 2021 by andelino

In two lightning-quick weeks in March, America went from caution to hysteria to lockdown. You’d have thought people were dropping dead in the streets by the millions.

Not so. Out of the 7.8 billion people on Earth, only a few thousand had actually died from the Wuhan virus. Yet America tilted into full-scale panic. Granted, this particular coronavirus seems especially contagious, and it poses significant risk for people with chronic health problems. Initial expert projections about death rates were shockingly high, some of them in the scores of millions.

However, while politicians, the press and public fixated on infection rates and death counts, evidence that the virus’s lethality was far lower than originally believed was ignored. When prominent authorities backed away from their worst-case scenarios, it went virtually unreported. America was too busy executing the strictest response to a disease ever recorded.

Each day brought new and more heavy-handed restrictions and wilder interventions: Sports leagues, suspended. Flights, grounded. Schools, closed. Public gatherings, dispersed. Nonessential shopping, banned. Leaving home, illegal. Trillions of dollars, spent. Government emergency plans were more draconian than perhaps any modern peacetime measures, and more expensive than anything in history.

These measures will no doubt save lives that would have been cut short by this virus. But they are also coming at incalculable cost—to our economies, our livelihoods, our civil liberties and freedoms, our social cohesion, even mental and physical health. In many ways it appears the ramifications of the reaction to the coronavirus will dwarf and far outlive the virus itself.

When people panic, they tend to do unreasonable things. To whatever degree this happened on a national and a global scale with this pandemic, it is important we understand why this danger is potentially so much more serious than the physical threat of a contagious virus.

These past few months have showcased a wild range of behavior. It started with whatever wrong practices produced this disease in human beings. It continued with the disease spreading due to ignoring biblical laws of health, sanitation, hygiene and quarantine. It continued with the cover-up by China’s police state government, which worked harder to stop the spread of news about the virus than to stop the virus itself.

Once the virus spread beyond China, we saw the World Health Organization (WHO), an agency of the United Nations, provide cover for the Communist Chinese government. The WHO director general downplayed the disease’s seriousness in January and said China’s government had done an outstanding job of containing the virus.

Following the impeachment trial of United States President Donald Trump in February, we saw his enemies in the media pivot immediately to propagating coronavirus panic. An army of medical experts rushed to the spotlight, equipped with incomplete data, wild speculation and frightening comparisons. Millions were about to die, they said. At the breathless demands of medical and media experts, governments hastily began closing entire economies. Citizens’ rights evaporated. One after another, like dominoes, whole nations went into shutdown.

Panic ensued, not just because of the disease, but also because of government overreach. Hoarders and profiteers cleared supermarket shelves and loaded their pantries and closets with cleaning supplies and toilet rolls. Everyone, it seemed, exploited the crisis. Those who didn’t seemed content to follow the confused and disoriented herd off the cliff.

Buried deep beneath this mass hysteria, sensational and politicized reporting, authoritarian overreach, and audacious assault on liberty was the first casualty of this contagion: “the truth.”

Communist Cover-up. In mid-December 2019, the Chinese city of Wuhan began witnessing an uptick in pneumonia cases. Local doctors realized they were dealing with a new disease and began to sound the alarm. They were quickly silenced by the Chinese government. By month’s end, after a weeks-long outbreak, China finally alerted the WHO that it was dealing with an unknown contagious disease. During those crucial weeks, 5 million people had traveled through Wuhan. On January 15, the first case arrived in the U.S.

On January 23, with the disease already far beyond its borders, China’s regime decided to lock down Wuhan. It enforced the quarantine just as you’d expect an authoritarian government to: Police drones watched foot traffic and blared commands at people not wearing face masks. The government started tracking smart phones to monitor individuals who may have been exposed to the virus. Those who’d been exposed couldn’t simply isolate themselves: “Video footage revealed police dragging people from their homes to put them into quarantine camps.”

The WHO director general downplayed the disease’s seriousness in January and said China’s government had done an outstanding job of containing the virus.

Tedros Adhanom, Director General of the World Health Organization, (L) attends a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the Great Hall of the People, on January 28, 2020 in Beijing, China. (Photo by Naohiko Hatta – Pool/Getty Images)

On January 30, WHO Director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a Marxist from Ethiopia with no medical experience but a noticeable loyalty to China, declared a public health emergency. He tweeted, “In many ways, China is actually setting a new standard for outbreak response. Our greatest concern is the potential for the virus to spread to countries with weaker health systems.”

The next day, President Trump took the first serious action to stop the spread of the contagion by restricting travel into the U.S. from China. One doctor quoted in the New York Times called this decision “more of an emotional or political reaction.” Presidential candidate Joe Biden later said it was hysterical and accused President Trump of “xenophobia and fear-mongering.” Other detractors called the president a racist. Even the WHO director general criticized the travel ban. On February 4, he said, “Such restrictions can have the effect of increasing fear and stigma, with little public health benefit.”

Meanwhile, mainstream media showed no interest in covid-19. On February 1, Washington Post ran this headline: “Get a Grip, America. The Flu Is a Much Bigger Threat Than Coronavirus, for Now.” USA Today reassured us that “Coronavirus Is Scary, but the Flu Is Deadlier, More Widespread.” At that time, the talking heads were too busy trying to convict President Trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress so they could remove him from office. On February 5, the Senate acquitted President Trump. The Democrat media complex immediately pivoted to the story it had ignored for weeks: “coronavirus.”

Weaponizing the Crisis. On February 12, the Dow Jones Industrial Average peaked at 29,551, its highest mark in history. It didn’t stay there for long. Around that time, covid-19 was spreading rapidly in Iran and southern Europe. To that point, President Trump had been the one Western leader who took measured action to actually contain the outbreak. But suddenly, pundits began saying he wasn’t doing enough.

At a campaign rally in South Carolina on February 28, President Trump accused Democrats and the major media of using the “epidemic” to try to destroy his presidency. “This is their new hoax,” he said. The radical left swiftly accused him of saying the virus itself was a hoax.

At the end of February, Spectator columnist Roger Kimball predicted, “No one knows exactly how far or how fast the coronavirus will spread. Nor does anyone yet know what its toll will be. But those predicting, at times, their eagerness makes it seem they are hoping for something as deadly as the Spanish flu epidemic of 1918 (when some 50 million were killed) are likely to be disappointed.”

The day after his rally in South Carolina, President Trump called for calm. “We would respectfully ask the media and politicians not to do anything to incite a panic,” he said. “There’s no reason to panic at all. This is something that’s being handled professionally.” In Europe, many talking heads were panicking for other reasons. Medical experts were saying the disease was spreading so fast that Europe’s nationalized health-care systems would be overrun with sick patients. Something drastic needed to be done to “flatten the curve.”

A Perfect Storm. On March 3, WHO Director Tedros, who had praised China for containing the virus and criticized President Trump for the travel ban, made this shocking announcement: “Globally, about 3.4 percent of reported covid-19 cases have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1 percent of those infected.”

It turned out that Tedros was frightening the world with dishonest math. He based the death rate for influenza on the estimated number of people infected with the common flu each year. He based the alarming 3.4 percent figure on the number of known cases of coronavirus, those who actually test positive for the disease. The vast majority of those infected are never tested. Other experts issued even more-ominous death rate predictions, some as high as 4 and 5 percent.

To his credit, President Trump dismissed these terrifying predictions. He said on March 5 that the 3.4 death rate was a “false number” because of all the mild cases of coronavirus that are never reported to doctors. Regarding the actual death rate, President Trump said he believed the number would be “way under 1 percent.” For this, he was castigated as being ignorant and irresponsible. He doesn’t even believe the virus is real, said the radical left.

On March 9, America’s anti-Trump media had seen enough. CNN chief medical correspondent Sanjay Gupta said, “Starting today, you will notice that CNN is using the term pandemic to describe the current coronavirus outbreak. It is not a decision we take lightly. While we know it sounds alarming, it should not cause panic,” which it immediately did. That day, the U.S. stock market plunged more than 2,000 points.

Why would CNN be ahead of the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in declaring covid-19 a pandemic? Because like so much of what CNN now does, its organizational aim is not to report news, but to make news, much of it to hurt the president.

Fox Business commentator Trish Regan noted this on her show the same day Gupta was inflaming coronavirus hysteria. She accused the radical left of “weaponizing” the health crisis against Donald Trump without regard to how much it might hurt the U.S. economy and ordinary Americans. This caused a storm of criticism, and by the end of the week, Fox News executives had suspended Regan, buckling under pressure from leftists who denounced the network for “downplaying” the crisis and covering up President Trump’s “mismanagement” of it. They later fired her.

The World Health Organization followed CNN’s lead on March 11, declaring covid-19 a “global” pandemic. President Trump responded by broadening the travel ban to include incoming flights from Europe. On March 13, he declared a national emergency. But the response measures, drastic as they were, had barely begun.

Junk Science. Together with the radical left, the Democrat media complex, the WHO and China’s Communist government, plenty of Western scientists and medical experts were available to create terrifying models, charts, graphs and reports to show that covid-19 was a catastrophe in the making. For the United States the most authoritative and influential team of experts came from “Imperial College” London. The New York Times wrote, “With ties to the World Health Organization and a team of 50 scientists, led by a prominent epidemiologist, Neil Ferguson, Imperial is treated as a sort of gold standard, its mathematical models feeding directly into government policies.”

What did the “gold standard” of scientific research uncover about covid-19 and its threat to society? According to the Imperial model, if we took no action to arrest the virus’s spread, 2.2 million in America would die of the Wuhan flu. “These kinds of numbers are deeply concerning for countries with top-drawer health-care systems,” wrote the Washington Post. “They are terrifying for less-developed countries, global health experts say.” In other words, if the U.S. lose 2.2 million people, think about what that means for the rest of the world.

Ferguson’s March 16 report began by saying the public health threat of covid-19 “is the most serious seen in a respiratory virus since the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic.” It said that if the U.S. employed more ambitious measures to mitigate the spread (case isolation, household quarantine, face masking and social distancing of the elderly), the death count could be reduced to 1.1 million in the U.S.

“Finally,” wrote the Post, “if the government quickly went all-out to suppress viral spread, aiming to reverse epidemic growth and reduce the case load to a low level, then the number of dead in the country could drop to below 20,000. To do this, the researchers said, we would have to enforce social distancing for the entire population, isolate all cases, demand quarantines of entire households where anyone is sick, and close all schools and universities.”

In other words, do what the Chinese did in Wuhan: “Lock it down.” China’s crackdown, remember, was praised by Tedros as a “new standard” in confronting outbreaks. And Western officials saw Ferguson’s team of epidemiologists as the “gold standard” of scientific research and theory. Not surprisingly, the Imperial team, with its “ties to the World Health Organization,” reached the same conclusion the WHO did.

Ferguson told the New York Times, “Based on our estimates and other teams’, there’s really no option but follow in China’s footsteps and suppress.” Follow Communist China’s lead, or millions and millions of people will drop dead.

And how long would Western governments need to impose a Communist-style lockdown? The “gold standard” recommended up to 18 months. Shutdowns, social distancing the entire population, quarantining the infirmed and their families, for a year and a half!

Covid-19 task forces in Washington accepted the catastrophic “Imperial” forecast without objection. As the New York Times opined, “It wasn’t so much the numbers themselves, frightening though they were, as who reported them: Imperial College London.” The “gold standard” had spoken: “Lockdown is our only option.”

The Rule of Experts. Before “Imperial” spoke, America favored promoting commonsense guidelines: “wash hands frequently, sneeze or cough into your folded arm, stay at home if you are sick, etc.” President Trump disinclined to use government agents to enforce more stringent guidelines. The virus might spread more rapidly without strict measures, he reasoned, but the vast majority of people survive and build up a greater “herd immunity,” which helps shield the public from disease in case it returns next season.

Over the weekend of March 14-15, the Trump administrations were briefed on the “Imperial College” forecast. The sudden, profound impact this model had on America, and indeed the world, was disastrous.

The president’s own medical expert, director of the “National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases” Flip Flopping Anthony Fauci, took to the Sunday shows on March 15 and said, “If it looks like you’re overreacting, you’re probably doing the right thing.” Even if you are young and healthy, he said, you could be a “carrier” who might spread it unknowingly.

On March 16, President Trump’s covid-19 task force released its 15-day “stop the spread” campaign. During the briefing, the president emphasized the commonsense guidelines, but also admonished all Americans to avoid gatherings of more than 10 people and eliminate discretionary travel; he also asked the elderly and vulnerable to self-quarantine.

In a Trump briefing in Washington, Dr. Deborah Birx referred to models the coronavirus task force had been working on with “groups in the United Kingdom.” It was Ferguson’s forecast, the New York Times wrote, that “triggered a sudden shift” in America’s “comparatively relaxed response to the virus.” Thus, it was the “Imperial College” model, which was essentially based on the WHO model, which was essentially based on the Communist Chinese model, that “jarred” the U.S. into taking the actions that would fundamentally transform the U.S. in ways a contagious disease never could.

World War Flu. The week before the “Imperial” model was published, Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte imposed a national quarantine on Italy. This followed earlier lockdowns in the regions of Lombardy and Lodi. On March 14, Spain and France closed their borders, shut down businesses, and chased people off the streets.

In the United States, the changeover was swift. On March 10, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said that for most people, this disease “basically acts like a common cold or flu” and that the elderly and sickly were most vulnerable. He gave commonsense guidelines for city residents to remember to protect the elderly. But on the whole, New Yorkers are “pretty tough,” he said, adding, “We cannot shut down because of undue fear.” Just four days later, this same mayor said his staff was on “full crisis footing” and had entered a “wartime dynamic.”

Many state governors and city mayors followed a similar pattern. That same weekend, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine ordered all bars and restaurants to close. He had to take this action because his chief medical adviser said the state already had 100,000 cases of covid-19 and that it would double every six days. Hospitals, he said, needed to prepare for inundation. Just days into the crisis, covid-19 was shutting down America in ways that the Second World War never did.

Media “sensationalism” played a significant role in stoking fear and panic. Columnist Peggy Noonan wrote, “‘Don’t Panic’ Is Rotten Advice,” on March 12, saying “Sometimes paranoia is just good sense.”

On March 14, the New York Times “reported” that as many as 214 million Americans could be infected, 21 million could require hospitalization and 1.7 million could die. This invisible killer would rampage for months, maybe more, and we would have to go to war to stop it.

“I think this could be a six-, seven-, eight-, nine-month affair, watching the trajectory of the virus,” New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said on March 13. Coronavirus, said one Bloomberg headline, would change the way we shop, travel and work for years.

The Solution: Socialism. Is it a coincidence that these dire predictions have major political ramifications? Is it a coincidence that the solutions demanded by the press and the political left are massive socialistic interventions? Is it coincidence that disobeying covid-19 guidelines feels like the new racism, and that governments are encouraging people to report their neighbors for such “crimes” as taking a walk? Is the coronavirus reaction interrupting the radical leftist agenda, or is it part of it?

A reporter asked President Trump about the U.S.’s heavy-handed covid-19 countermeasures. He pointed at the medical experts. He said that a “few people” walked into his office and said, “We have to close up the country.” The president added that had he not taken these draconian steps, America would have been “unbelievably criticized.” He then made this remark: “Somehow the word got out that this is the thing we’re supposed to be doing.”

It’s never been done before, but somehow, this is what we’re all supposed to be doing. This is the new normal. This is World War Flu. We’re fighting for our survival, and we’ve all suddenly decided that a sort of public health totalitarianism is our only hope. Anyone who would dare question these wartime rules and regulations must immediately be silenced or branded as a heretic. Everyone must go along. It’s what we’re “supposed” to do.

The same week President Trump released his 15-day plan to stop the spread, the Department of Homeland Security began to distribute passes to broadcasters allowing them access to their facilities, to travel “during curfews and restricted travel periods,” during these uncertain times. Before 2002, Homeland Security didn’t even exist. Today, it has 240,000 employees and the power to decide which Americans are important enough to travel unmolested.

Then, the last week of March, Congress passed the $2.2 trillion “Cares Act,” the biggest spending bill in the history of human civilization. The act “cares” about ordinary Americans, and also “the Kennedy Center, the National Archives, NASA, the Forest Service, the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities, and the Institute of American Indian and Alaska Native Culture and Arts Development,” all of which received generous coronavirus “relief.”

Kimberley Strassel wrote at the Wall Street Journal, “A rough calculation suggests the single biggest recipient of taxpayer dollars in this legislation, far in excess of $600 billion, is government itself.” As liberals often say, never let a crisis go to waste! Strassel wrote, “This legislation may prove the biggest one-day expansion of government power ever.” America’s “cure” for the crisis: “Broaden the power of the central government, expand the welfare state, and mortgage our future and the future of our children.”

Republican Rep. Thomas Massie made the mistake of clinging to some principle of constitutional representative government: “He demanded that all members of Congress be present for the vote on the $2.2 trillion bill, thus delaying the House vote.” He said legislators should be in some small way accountable for the largest expenditure in human history by at least signing their names to it.

Judging by the vitriolic reaction to Massie, you might have thought he was responsible for spreading covid-19. President Trump called Massie a “third-rate grand-stander” who only wanted “publicity.” Republicans called on Massie to lose his primary to another Republican challenger during the next election cycle. Former Secretary of State John Kerry said Massie needed to “be quarantined to prevent the spread of his massive stupidity.”

Massie became the least popular man in Washington for demanding a recorded tally for the vote, rather than the anonymous “voice vote” directed by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and preferred by almost every other powerful member of Congress. Pelosi quickly assembled enough representatives in the chamber to overrule Massie, and the “voice vote” easily moved the bill through to the president’s desk.

Rep. Peter King of New York later said that if anyone in Congress got infected with the virus as a result of having to be present at the capitol to overrule Massie, Massie would have blood on his hands.

This is how it works during this “wartime dynamic.” Constitutional norms are suspended. Lockdowns are commonplace. Big government determines who’s essential. And obscenely huge bailouts meet with zero resistance in Congress. Anyone who would dare question these “wartime” rules and regulations must immediately be silenced or branded as a heretic. Everyone must go along. It’s what we’re “supposed” to do.

The Still-Elusive Death Rate. On March 21, Medium ran an article questioning many of the outlandish predictions for covid-19. To author Aaron Ginn, a Silicon Valley technologist with no background in medicine or infectious disease, the numbers didn’t add up. He said that as testing for the virus increased, the mortality rate would inevitably decline. And sure enough, the two nations that have tested for the disease the most, the United States and Germany, had mortality rates of 1.7 and 0.78 percent at the time of this writing. These rates were not as low as the seasonal flu, but nowhere near as high as Tedros predicted on March 3.

The death rate of 0.1 for seasonal flu is based on the estimated number of flu cases, not of patients who are actually tested. Since we don’t know the number of mild cases of covid-19 that go unreported, the actual death rate for the disease is probably much lower than 1 percent. This was the main point of Ginn’s post. Soon, Medium deleted it for violating Medium rules. As more information on the covid-19 crisis emerges, it is not Ginn who is being proved wrong, but the public health experts.

Another study in America received a lot of attention. It was headlined “U.S. Virus Deaths May Top 80,000 Despite Confinement.” With most of America now glued to the daily death tracker, this study was used to incite more fear and hysteria. The truth behind the headline, however, is that it represented another rapid retreat from the original projections of Spanish flu-like devastation. Eighty thousand deaths from coronavirus is not a repeat of the 1918 pandemic. It’s more comparable to the ferocious flu season of 2017–18, when 45 million Americans were infected, 810,000 were hospitalized and 61,000 died (0.14 death rate). That happened two years ago. “And no one cared.”

CNN’s Sanjay Gupta also reversed course on March 27: “The vast majority of people, even if you are elderly, aren’t going to need hospitalization. The vast majority are going to recover. The vast majority are not going to die.” Just one week before, Gupta said U.S. hospitals were unprepared for what was about to happen. And the week before that, when Gupta declared covid-19 a pandemic, he relied on case studies in China that said 5 percent of those infected became critically ill.

Even “Flip Flopping” Anthony Fauci, who had originally said covid-19 was “10 times more lethal” than the common flu, wrote in the March 26 New England Journal of Medicine: “If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1 percent. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza  or a pandemic influenza.”

After the Virus Dies. By the end of March, President Trump hinted at a possible end to the lockdown madness, sooner rather than later. “We cannot let the cure be worse than the problem itself,” he said on March 22.

Two days later, during a virtual town hall at Fox News, the president spoke about how contagious and deadly influenza can be, but America never closes down. “We can’t let this virus destroy our country,” he said. “We have to get back to work.” He suggested April 12 as a possible date for reopening the U.S. economy.

This statement alarmed the experts. Even as they were dramatically lowering their early death toll projections, America was still in grave danger. “Flip Flopping” Fauci rushed to the media, telling them America might lose 100,000 to 200,000 people even under a strict lockdown. The president again decided to comply with their counsel and extended the social-distancing guidelines through the end of April. “The experts, you see, are right, even when they get it spectacularly wrong.”

As for the left-wing media, they were committed to “sensationalizing” this crisis for as long as possible. The longer it lasts, the more it benefits their ratings and their political objectives. Though early polls suggested that a majority of Americans were pleased with how President Trump handled the crisis, the Democrat media complex knew that the only chance for success at the ballot box in November was if the coronavirus death toll keeps rising and the stock market and the economy keep dropping.

Whenever America finally does reopen for business, the president seems confident of a turnaround: “We will come back strong,” he said. And that might be true, at least for the short term.

But what will be the long-term cost of all these “cures”? Once the virus subsides, will governments roll back the socialist programs and release the authoritarian reins? Will the radical left ease off on their unrelenting, irrational and vicious attacks against the presidency and America’s founding principles? Will this be the end of sensational reporting and scaremongering? Will teams of experts return to the university and correct the mistakes that helped to incite a worldwide panic and economic meltdown?

We’ve seen large numbers of people whipping themselves into a frenzy before. The world has grown more and more radical, emotional and panicked, especially over the last few decades. But nothing has illustrated this quite like the reaction to covid-19.

We shut down the world, suspended our constitutional republic, ground economies to a halt, drove millions to joblessness, drained the stock market, spent more money than ever before, massively expanded and empowered government, and ballooned the size of the welfare state. In the end, will it prove to all be in hasty response to the equivalent of, as “Flip Flopping” Fauci said, “a bad flu season”?

None of this makes sense, unless you realize that it all traces back to one cause. I’m not talking about leftists in America or in other countries, I’m talking about the original source. That one source is Satan the devil.

Satan is a real, actual evil spirit being. He is active in the world. In fact, he has power to influence people, and he has successfully deceived the whole world. As Ephesians 2:2 says, the god of this world actually isn’t God the Father or Jesus Christ, it’s Satan! That’s what your Bible says. Isn’t that what you’re seeing on the news right now?

It is crucial to understand how Satan preys on out-of-control emotions! “Whenever people are fighting to survive and emotions are flying the devil is going to exploit that every time!”

Whether covid-19 has affected or will affect your health, your livelihood or your freedoms, you need to take note of what has just happened to the world. The immensely powerful and self-destructive reaction to a bad flu season illustrates the power of Satan to prey on emotions. He can wreak havoc worldwide. And he can do it in your life too.

The battle here is not just against a virus or confusion or misinformation or an agenda. For the world and for you individually, it’s against Satan. The world won’t see it until it’s too late, will you?

The Truth About Vaccines

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on April 27, 2021 by andelino

“Fraud-In-Chief” Joe Biden has given his first speech since entering the White House. In it, he took “credit” for President Donald Trump’s coronavirus vaccination plan, while accusing President Trump of doing nothing in response to coronavirus, and said that if Americans are “well behaved”, he might benevolently allow them to celebrate “Independence Day” in small groups.

The propaganda media “loved” this speech! MSNBC analyst David Corn called the address “the speech that Donald Trump refused to give.” Washington Post contributor Jennifer Rubin praised it as being “a sober, sometimes poetic and hopeful speech mixed with Biden’s telltale expressions of empathy and sorrow for the losses we have suffered.”

Vaccines won’t work’: US virologist breaks down COVID-19, how to curb spread

Biden gave this speech on March 11, the one-year anniversary of governmental “Wuhan virus” lockdowns, as if to “celebrate” the central government’s unprecedented shutdown of America.

He recounted “how countless Americans lost their jobs, lost their businesses, lost their homes; how a generation of children was set back a year because of school closures; and how weddings, graduations and family reunions were canceled because of governmental lockdowns.” But this was not an admission that the government is wildly exaggerating the actual danger.

It was not an admission that the government is “mishandling” and intentionally “manipulating” the people for reasons that have nothing to do with a comparatively minor epidemic. This was not an admission that few to none of these lockdowns would have happened if his own political party had not aggressively pushed for them against Republican opposition.

Instead, it was “praise” for the lockdowns, punctuated by the sanctimonious statement that if every American obeys “Flip Flop” Anthony Fauci, masks up, gets tested and gets vaccinated, then maybe the government will let them enjoy a “barbecue” with their families on—ironically—“Independence Day.”

Liberals have been “shaming” Americans into “wearing” a mask, then two masks, “standing” like robots on floor markers 6 feet away from each other, “staying” inside their homes, “giving up” their businesses and incomes, and “sacrificing” their constitutional rights.

Now they are using the same “tactics” to pressure you and me to get an “untested, dangerous coronavirus vaccine.”

“Now because of all the work we’ve done, we’ll have enough vaccine supply for all adults in America by the end of May. That’s months ahead of schedule,” Biden said. “And we’re mobilizing thousands of vaccinators to put the vaccine in one’s arm. We are calling on active-duty military, Fema, retired doctors and nurses, administrators, and those to administer the shots. And we’ve been creating more places to get the shots. We’ve made it possible for you to get a vaccine at any one of nearly 10,000 pharmacies across the country, just like you get your flu shot.”

Four former American presidents have encouraged Americans to get injected: “Barack Obama, George Bush, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter.” That is every living former president, except Donald Trump. Yet neither they nor others who are “pushing” these injections urge caution or say much of anything regarding their “effectiveness” or their “dangerous” side effects.

It would be illogical to think that a “hurriedly developed, hurriedly approved, heavily politicized, potentially hugely profitable injection with vaguely defined contents” wouldn’t be potentially dangerous.

Especially if it is being distributed on an emergency basis and especially if the disease it is supposed to “cure” is anywhere near as dangerous as we’ve been told.

But the government is pushing it, the liberal chorus is shaming people into it, and people are taking it.

People like writer and actor Ben Stein, who said, “I had the covid booster by Moderna four or five days ago, and I am still feeling wild side effects from it, like I have the worst flu in the world, extreme shortness of breath, dizziness, fatigue, extreme irrational thinking. And it has just been devastating. This booster is a killer. It’s not going to kill you literally, but it is very, very strong. Beware.”

People like Kassidi Kurill. Her father said she was “healthy and good, then she took the shot.” The 39-year-old got her second dose of the Moderna covid-19 vaccine, began feeling poorly, was bedridden for two days, and asked her father to drive her to the emergency room. Doctors told him that her liver had stopped functioning. Before they could do anything further, her kidneys and heart stopped functioning.

A KUTV investigation found that three other Utah families have reported vaccine-related deaths to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. There have been other scattered reports of vaccines apparently killing people, including miscarriages and stillbirths, in the U.S., Canada, Norway, Portugal, Italy and elsewhere.

More than 20 countries have revoked their authorizations for the distribution of certain covid vaccines while permitting and promoting others.

Yet experts like Utah’s chief medical examiner say that proving a vaccine as a cause of death almost never happens. Is that because a vaccine almost never causes death, or could there be other reasons? The interests of powerful pharmaceutical companies, the medical industry and big government, perhaps?

Life insurance companies have their own interests too, and there are reports that due to the vaccines’ obviously experimental nature, they may not cover people who have been injected with it—whether the government acknowledges that as their cause of death or not—because it might be their cause of death.

And this doesn’t even cover the other known serious side effects, including dangerous blood clots, and other unknown serious side effects that will occur in a matter of years or months.

This is the world you live in: “Central governments are using agents and active-duty troops to inject people with a rapidly developed, rapidly approved, clearly dangerous, experimental, emergency vaccine.”

This is not just the government doing its best with a bad situation. This is the government taking a fairly standard “flu season” and promoting it to expand its “power” and prepare for even greater “manipulation” consequences.

People, like sheeple, are largely accepting what they are told, many are getting their injections, and some are dying.

Governments including the U.S. “count” anyone who died 28 to 60 days after having a positive covid-19 test as a “covid” death. That discounts the fact that many of the tests produce false-positives, including some people who signed up to take the test, never actually took it, then are told that they tested positive for covid.

The government and media’s ominous “covid death” tickers literally include people who die from other causes as obvious as gunshot wounds. Examples here, here and here.

The government counts anyone who died with a positive covid test result as a “covid death.” They reject people who say that dying with covid is far different from dying from covid.

They reject people who say that you have to put the death in context, look for complicating factors, realize that many who get tested are more at risk of death in the first place, realize that there are thousands of deaths from all causes every day in the United Sates, realize that many who die after a positive test result actually died from other causes, realize that they died with covid (if the test was right) but did not die from it.

So does the government count anyone who died with the covid vaccine a “covid vaccine death?” No. The same officials, experts, journalists and commentators who say that dying with covid is the same as dying from covid are now stridently insisting that dying with a covid vaccine is far different from dying from a covid vaccine.

They say you have to put the vaccinated person’s death in context, look for complicating factors, realize that many who get the vaccine are more at risk of death in the first place, realize that there are thousands of deaths from all causes every day in the United States, realize that many who die after receiving the vaccine would have died from other causes, realize that they died with the vaccine but not necessarily from the vaccine.

Kit Knightly at OffGuardian, who brought this out, noted the bias apparent in the headlines:

Pfizer COVID Vaccine Probably Didn’t Kill Woman, 78, Who Died Shortly After Having It.

Woman Dies From Brain Hemorrhage in Japan Days After Vaccine, but Link Uncertain.

Macomb County Man, 90, Dies After COVID-19 Vaccine—but Doctors Say Shots Are Safe.

Knightly quoted a doctor and ABC News contributor who talks about “spurious relationships” and says that sickness and death occurring “in proximity” to something does not necessarily prove that the thing caused the sickness and death.

He is right, of course, that something happening before something else is often not its cause. But is he talking about being accurate with covid death counts? No, he’s helping the ABC “fact-checkers” reduce the number of covid vaccine death counts.

Knightly also cited a Good Morning Britain interview with Dr. Nighat Arif who admits that there is technically always a 0.1 percent risk that the average person will get a blood clot. “If you’re on a flight, your risk of clot increases. If women are on the contraceptive pill, their risk of clot increases; people going to the hospital for surgery. However, we don’t stop doing any of those things.”

“The doctor is actually arguing that refusing to live your life based on a 0.1 percent risk of death is foolish and that nobody should be expected to do that,” Knightly wrote. “It is, literally, word for word a ‘covid skeptic’ argument, reproduced in the mainstream, without even the tiniest hint of irony or self-awareness.”

These “experts” have “a deliberately employed double standard, and that is a tacit admission of intentional deception.”

Meanwhile, people are getting infected, suffering and dying from the covid-19 vaccine. “Sniffy” Joe Biden’s plan to vaccinate every American makes as much sense as deliberately infecting every American with the coronavirus itself.

Tens of thousands will likely die if the Democrats go through with this insane plan. And once the government grabs that much power over people’s rights, including their health, it won’t give it up.

Now is a good time to be thinking about health. It is a good time to be thinking about where you put your trust for health and healing. We all put our trust in something. The average person’s lack of reaction to what is happening with covid shows that most of us put our trust in the medical establishment to a large degree.

Even when that medical establishment is inherently limited to what human beings can scientifically discover, even when what it discovers is then discovered to be wrong only years or months later, even when advancements in science are constantly outpaced by advancements in disease, even when the medical method of “healing” is not to return the body to its natural state but to make it even less natural with chemicals and scalpels, even when much of the medical industry has nothing to do with science or healing at all and has everything to do with the profit margins for pharmaceutical stockholders and the political agenda of politicians.

When it comes to your health, your body, your life, you really do need to understand the truth. The truth is that physical, biological laws exist. Obeying them, to your advantage, causes the effect of good health. Breaking them, whether by accidentally cutting your finger or injecting chemicals including synthetic MRNA into your arm, causes the effect of poor health.

The medical industry has “operated primarily on that method,”  trying, with medicines, to prevent God’s law from exacting its penalty. That theory says, in effect, we can transgress God’s law and then prevent God’s law from exacting its penalty.

The theory is: “The sufferer has in his body one poison, so we add another poison in the form of medicine. And one poison plus one more poison equals NO poison!”

The monstrosity that is the covid-19 vaccine rollout is a full expression of this distorted theory. It is amazing the lengths human beings will go to in order to themselves, so long as they can avoid submitting to the laws of the very Creator of human bodies and minds.

God’s arithmetic is one poison minus that one poison equals no poison. And yes, it requires the laws of the Creator and even the intervention of the Creator.

How foolish we human beings are! Convinced that we are an evolving species, ever growing in our knowledge of how to control our universe, dazzled by the “progress” of science, we fail to grasp the reality of the daunting nature of the escalating and increasingly unsolvable problems that parallel our “evolution”!

Science will be forced to increasingly admit defeat by forces outside its control. Mankind will ultimately have to return to the “old paths” (Jeremiah 6:16), to subscribe to the law of God wherein lies the good way, the way of abundant, vibrant health, supported by the curative effects of natural God-made products designed for the “healing of the nations”!

PlanDemic: A Film About The Global Plan To Take Control Of Our Lives

Chinese Rectal Swabs

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on March 4, 2021 by andelino

Welcome to China!

American diplomats literally “Bend Over” (Wánliǎo) and spread their “derriere” cheeks for Chinese disease control experts to get a COVID “anal swab” tests upon arriving in Beijing.

Washington complained the “rectal” procedure was “undignified” and told staff to “decline” future test if asked to take one.

The Chinese government say the “anal swab” tests were given to US diplomats “in error” and promised to stop using “anal swabs” on American diplomats.

“The State Department never agreed to this kind of testing and protested directly to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs when we learned that some staff were subject to it,” a State Department spokesperson said.

“Beijing assured Washington that diplomatic personnel were exempt from the test, which was mandatory for incoming travelers in some parts of China.”

Foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian told a daily news briefing in the Chinese capital: “To my knowledge China has never required U.S. diplomatic staff stationed in China to conduct anal swab tests.”

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian says the reports from Vice and Washington Post are false.

Some Chinese regions have been ordering anal swabs for people under quarantine, including those who arrived from abroad. Authorities say the tests can avoid missing infections.

It’s not clear how many U.S. diplomats or their family members have gone through the tests. The State Department spokesperson said it is committed to preserving the “dignity” of American diplomats and their families, consistent with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and other diplomatic law provisions.

In an online post earlier, China’s National Health Commission said in some cases, the Wuhan virus can be more readily detected in anal samples than in throat and nasal samples. But it acknowledged rectal swabs are not suitable for mass use because they are inconvenient and unpopular.

According to the commission’s instructions, to collect test samples, the swab needs to be inserted about three to five centimeters (1.2 to 2 inches) into the rectum and rotated several times.

To collect the nucleic acid samples, the swab needs to be inserted about three to five centimeters (1.2  to 2 inches) and rotated several times.

After completing the motion twice, the swab is removed before being securely placed inside a sample container. The whole procedure is said to take about 10 seconds.

The “woke” Chinese anal testers began using the “derriere detecting method” more frequently during mass testing drives after a nine-year-old boy tested positive for the virus last month.

A video widely circulated online shows a doctor holding a visual demonstration of the procedure.

Reports about anal COVID-19 testing prompted a “wave of panic” on Chinese social media. A traveler from Australia to China who was given anal swabs in September said it felt like having diarrhea.

“Anal swabs” have been used in China to test the Wuhan virus since last year, but the method is mainly used in key groups at quarantine centers because of its inconvenience, according to a Chinese disease control expert.

Some Chinese cities used samples taken from the anus to detect potential infections amid stepped up screening during a spate of regional outbreaks ahead of the “Lunar New Year” holidays.

Tests using “anal swabs” can avoid missing infections as virus traces in fecal samples or anal swabs could remain detectable for a longer time than in those from the respiratory tract, Li Tongzeng, a respiratory diseases doctor in Beijing, told state television last month.

“Stool tests may also be more effective in finding infections in children and infants as their waste carries a higher viral load than adults” researchers at the Chinese University of Hong Kong said in a paper published last year. But the accuracy and efficiency of anal swabs remain controversial among experts.

Chinese Anal Testers.

Yang Zhanqiu, a deputy director of the pathogen biology department at Wuhan University, told state media Global Times that the nasal and throat swabs remain the most efficient test as the virus is proven to be contracted via one’s upper respiratory tract rather than the digestive system.

“There have been cases concerning the coronavirus testing positive in a patient’s excrement, but no evidence has suggested it had been transmitted through one’s digestive system,” Yang explained.

China has largely contained the pandemic; only a handful of cases are reported daily across the country of 1.4 billion people. Its relatively early recovery helped its film industry break records earlier this month during the Lunar New Year holiday, but the authorities remain wary of “foreign visitors” who could bring new outbreaks.

Assistant Secretary of Health Richard “Rachel” Levine.

Judging from the current crop of appointed diplomats by “Fraud-In-Chief” Joe Biden, I would be willing to bet that most of them enjoyed the “anal swab” experience.

It will be interesting if our illustrious Government leader, liberated from the oppressive binds of conservative ideology, will condemn the Chinese government for never offering a “Ginseng Colonic” after the anal probe.

Perhaps to avoid “gender norms” and wrap themselves in a cloak of moral superiority, it will become fashionable to display feathery “butt plugs” instead of decals or ribbons that inform everyone that you have been “anally” tested.

American diplomats in China complain they were forced to take anal swab tests for coronavirus

Fauci Created Wuhan Virus

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on January 15, 2021 by andelino

Criminal Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Right after Trump was inaugurated in 2017, Dr. Fauci spoke before a medical board and said this administration would be hit with a major pandemic.

I wondered how he knew three years in advance we would be hit. According to a recent report, Dr. Fauci was part of the team that created the virus in China in 2015.

Dr. Peter Breggin a doctor and psychiatrist who, along with his wife, wrote a 60-page article about Fauci being responsible for creating the Coronavirus and now is teaming up with “Sniffy” Joe Biden.

Dr. Breggin a very learned man and well known in the medical field is not some conspiracy theorist. He graduated from Harvard Medical School with honors, is a frequent speaker at Medical functions, and has his own psychiatrist practice. You can read Breggins’ complete report here.

Dr. Peter Breggin.

Four scientists, led by Li-Meng Yan (MD, Ph.D.), who recently had to flee Communist China because of her whistle blowing about the virus being created in the lab in Wuhan, have released a pre-publication paper in which they confirm the direct relationship between the Fauci funded research and China’s ability to create SARS-CoV-2.

In the 60 page paper written by Peter R. Breggin, MD and Ginger, Breggin maintain that the Chinese government now has the unlimited ability to keep manufacturing pandemic viruses.

Here is a brief summary of their findings:

This report documents in detail how Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), has been the major force behind a series of research activities and other government actions that enabled the Chinese Communist Party to create lethal SARS corona viruses, leading to the release of SARS-CoV-2 from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Fauci continues to cover for the Chinese and for himself, denying the origin of SARS-CoV-2, and delaying and thwarting worldwide attempts to deal rationally with the pandemic. This report documents with more than 100 linked citations the following activities by Dr. Fauci until stopped by President Trump in mid-April 2020

Fauci funded both individual Chinese researchers and the Wuhan Institute as collaborators with American researchers in creating lethal corona viruses from harmless bat viruses. This collaboration and direct funding enabled the Chinese Communist Party and its’ military to make potential bio-weapons on their own, including SARS-CoV-2.

In April 2020, shortly after our disclosure of these US/Chinese collaborations, President Trump canceled funding for them. However, Fauci has recently unleashed a deluge of new funding that will almost certainly benefit Chinese scientists at universities and research facilities in this country who have close ties to the Chinese Communist Party.

The connection between SARS-CoV-2 and the Fauci funded American and Chinese collaboration making corona viruses was initially made in February 2020 in a scientific publication by an American-trained (Northwestern University and Harvard Medical School) Chinese researcher named Botao Xiao and his associate Lei Xiao. Perhaps because it was so cogently written and spot-on, the Chinese Communist government forced the researchers to recant.

The Wuhan Institute is a center of China’s bio-warfare/bio-defense capacity and its director is China’s top military expert in bio-warfare, and yet Fauci shared advanced bio-warfare-related research with and actually funded the Wuhan Institute and its scientists.

Fauci has funded and continues to fund coronavirus “gain-of-function” research projects which turn benign animal viruses into human pathogens capable of causing pandemics. The stated purpose is to learn to prevent and treat future outbreaks; but research labs are the most common source of outbreaks from dangerous pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, as well as two earlier accidental escapes by SARS viruses in 2004 from a research facility in Beijing.

In 2014, when blocked by an order from Barack Obama from funding dangerous “gain-of-function” studies, Fauci outsourced the research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. He also covertly continued to fund the major gain-of-function collaboration between US and Chinese Wuhan Institute researchers at the University of North Carolina. Fauci thus made a mockery of Obama’s attempts to stop the potentially catastrophic research.

In order to outsource dangerous viral research from the US to China during the Obama moratorium, Fauci prematurely approved the Wuhan Institute as a highest level containment facility, known as BSL-4, capable of safely working with lethal viruses. He did this while knowing the Institute had a very poor safety record and while also knowing that all such facilities in China are overseen by the military as part of its bio-warfare program.

 

Thus, Fauci created two “grave worldwide threats”, the accidental release of a deadly coronavirus and/or its use as a military weapon.

Without fanfare, toward the end of the first year of the Trump administration in 2017, Fauci and NIH canceled Obama’s moratorium against building viral pathogens in US labs and openly restored gain-of-function research creating lethal viruses. The original moratorium was a direct order by Obama on White House stationary while its undoing was a decision made within the National Institutes of Health and NIAID, probably without Trump’s knowledge.

From the initial outbreak of the pandemic in China and continuing to this day, Fauci has supported Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the corrupt Director-General of the World Health Association (WHO). Together, they initially minimized the dangers of COVID-19. Fauci and Tedros also delayed worldwide preparations for the pandemic while allowing the Chinese to spread the virus with thousands of international passenger flights.

Standing beside President Trump at a briefing, Fauci publicly undermined the President’s criticism of Director-General Tedros and China. Instead, Fauci reassured the world that Tedros was a trustworthy and “outstanding” man—implying that Tedros connections in China were similarly reliable and could be trusted.

Fauci holds himself out as the ultimate source of objective scientific information and science-based conclusions. In reality, he works with and empowers globalist pharmaceutical firms and globalist organizations such as WHO and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Meanwhile, these globalists gained power and influence as their policies and practices, including the shutdowns, continue to worsen.

Overall, Fauci has been and continues to be an extraordinarily destructive force in the world. Most damaging to humanity, he enabled China to create SARS-CoV-2 and other deadly viruses for use as biological weapons. At the same time, he developed chilling ties to the Chinese Communist Party and its military, even financing their activities through NIAID and helping them to obtain valuable US patents.

Then, in collaboration with China and WHO, he initially hid the origins and dangers of the pandemic, so that it spread more rapidly around the world. Then he became the go-to scientist and management czar for the very pandemic that he helped to create, enormously increasing his power and influence, and the wealth of his institute and his global collaborators, including Bill Gates and the international pharmaceutical industry conditions throughout the world.

The escape of a man-made virus, intentionally or not, is infinitely more likely than a lone bat virus evolving into a pathogen in nature and then finding a human host. In nature, a novel virus attacking a human, causing a unique disease, and becoming an epidemic must begin with a rare chance of a genetic variation through biological evolution which is a very slow, hit-and-miss process, usually involving extraordinary periods of time.

Then the chance variation among the many millions of bats flying around must have an equally rare chance to meet and to infect a suitable human host, who must then infect at least one other human before dying, etc. These bats live in rural caves hundreds of miles away from Wuhan, adding to the unlikelihood of such an event.

All of this makes a jump from nature to humans extremely unlikely compared to the accidental escape of one of the SARS-CoV viruses already stored or being created at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

As this report has already suggested, there is a more frightening risk associated with making viruses that are potentially deadly to humanity—they can fall into the wrong hands and become bio-weapons. What Fauci has been doing is doubly catastrophic, first, in the making of deadly viruses and, second, in collaborating with China in mutually creating obvious bio-weapons.

Dr. Li Meng Jan the virologist whistleblower has maintained this also saying they took a relatively harmless virus and modified it to be deadly. She is currently in hiding somewhere in the United States and has given interviews to Tucker Carlson and a few others.

As Dr. Breggin said the Chinese now have the unlimited power to keep making pandemics to make the world submit to them.

Presidential candidate Joe Biden tweeted:  “If I’m elected, I won’t wait to take action on COVID-19. Minutes after the race is called, I’ll call Dr. Fauci and ask him to stay on.”

Biden has taken a strong position on “listen to the scientists: I would be prepared to do whatever it takes to save lives because we cannot get the country moving until we control the virus. That is the fundamental flaw of this administration’s thinking to begin with,” the former vice president told ABC News’ David Muir “I would shut it down. I would listen to the scientists,” he said.

Tragically, Joe Biden’s refrain of “listen to the scientists,” including Anthony Fauci, means imposing an ever greater scientific dictatorship on America.

This Thanksgiving we have seen various scientists including Fauci, Birx and Biden telling Americans not to travel and stay home. Governors have instructed neighbors to inform on each other if they are breaking the more than 10 at a time rule and The Vermont governor has instructed teachers to have their students to rat out their parents.  If they have more than 10 people over they risk being quarantined for 14 days or quarantine for seven days with a covid test.

These are things that happen in communist countries and the Democrats have taken to weaponizing this virus to achieve their own power. Now Fauci is warning again about Christmas and people should stay at home and not celebrate with the increase of a number of cases that have popped up.

Dr. Breggin has recently stated in a column online that “There are additional reasons for Joe Biden’s affinity for Anthony Fauci. Both are lifelong members of the Deep State with roots so progressive and venal that they end up entangled with the Chinese Communist Party.”

Joe Biden, it recently has been confirmed, also has deep ties to China, only in his case, the money has been flowing from China to the “Biden Family,” in the tens of millions of dollars.

Joe, like Fauci, has criticized Trump’s get-tough policy on China during COVID-19  and he has made light of China’s overall threat to the US.  Biden and Fauci, running the country together, “will be a devastating pair of corrupt politicians who can neither defend nor promote the interests of Americans.”


Renowned scientist tells Laura Ingraham the Covid-19 vaccine is ‘downright dangerous’ and will send you ‘to your doom’
Dr. Fauci in 2017: President Trump Will Be Challenged By a “Surprise Global Disease Outbreak”
Criminals Fauci & Birx
My doc and I agree about the coronavirus
Dr. Fauci and my brother Mark

%d bloggers like this: