Archive for women

Pastoral Counseling of Women

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , on April 1, 2021 by andelino

Here’s some free “relationship” advice for you:

“Never listen to a Pastor talking about counseling women.”

Pastor Stewart-Allen Clark of First General Baptist Church in Malden, Missouri gave a sermon on “how to keep your marriage strong.”

His answers?

“Wives need to look preferably ‘hot’  like Melania Trump, and that means ’losing’ weight and ‘submitting’ to their husband’s ‘sexual desires’ at all times. Or else it’s all her ‘fault’ when he strays.”

I suspect some readers might have a more “visceral” reaction to the kind of “abusive, misogynistic” messages he’s sending to women.

“And ladies, here’s the thing you need to know about men: Don’t give him a reason to be like this distracted boyfriend. You hear me? Don’t give him a reason to be looking around. Hello?!”

“So, okay, why is it so many times that women, after they get married, let themselves go? Why is that? Why do they do that?”

“Now look, I’m not saying every woman can be the epic, the epic trophy wife of all time, like Melania Trump, I’m not saying that at all. Most women can’t be trophy wives, but, you know, like her, maybe you’re a participation trophy. I don’t know. But all I can say is not everybody looks like that! Amen?! But you don’t need to look like a butch either!”

“But you say, ‘How can I do that?’” Oh, I’m so glad you asked that question! Because you’re in my office, you and your husband, and we’re talking about your marriage, and you’ve asked me this question about ‘What can I do about that?’ All right, if you were sitting in my office, here’s the first thing I’d say to you, and boy, I hate to say this, this is why I don’t do marital counseling anymore, and that is… weight control.”

“So how important is this? Let me tell you something: I have a friend. He has put a ‘divorce weight’ on his wife! That’s how important this is!”

“You know, makeup! Makeup is a good thing. You know, my little boy said, ‘Why do girls wear makeup and perfume?’ You say ‘Because they’re ugly and they stink.’ You don’t want to be ugly and stink!”

“Scientists have discovered, by the way, a food that diminishes the woman’s sex drive. It’s called the wedding cake. Hahahahahahahaha, yeah.”

I can’t go through all the problems with his thinking here because it’s just… a lot. But it’s disturbing that not a single staffer at this church who knew what he was going to talk about talked him out of it.

The video is no longer on the church’s website, but there’s no explanation for that deletion either. It’s like they just hope no one will notice.

A couple obvious points that come up here: “There’s an underlying assumption that it’s the woman’s responsibility to satisfy her husband and be eye candy for him, and that it’s her fault if he strays, and that it’s her responsibility to make him happy.” It’s never the other way around. At least that’s not the focus of this sermon.

He also weirdly implies that all men find the exact same kind of woman attractive, and all relationships have the same kind of dynamics, and no woman cares about a man’s attractiveness, and no woman has a sex drive like a man, and all women have less sex after marriage.

The fact that he doesn’t realize those things aren’t universal is telling. This kind of mentality, as many anyone would tell you, is groundwork for “abuse.” It puts all the weight of a marriage on one person and provides a scapegoat for anything that goes wrong.

Whether he implied it or not, there’s no set of rules a husband has to follow that’s in any way the equivalent of what he’s telling women. And the fact that this conversation has been occurring within churches is an indication of the bubble these people live in.

When reached for comment, General Baptist Ministries, the umbrella organization overseeing this church, issued a pathetic statement without even explaining why they were saying it. If you didn’t read everything I just posted, you’d have no clue what they’re talking about.

“General Baptists believe that every woman was created in the image of God, and they should be valued for that reason. Furthermore, we believe that all individuals regardless of any other factors are so loved by God that Christ died for them. Each General Baptist church has autonomy from the national organization, and as a result General Baptist Ministries does not have authority related to the employment of any pastor or church leader in a local congregation.”

Not every sermon of Clark’s has been removed though. For example, here’s another one making the rounds, allegedly from “Mother’s Day 2019.” In that sermon, Clark walks on stage in high heels, explaining that he’s doing it in the “spirit of trying to identify as a woman” and takes the cringe to new levels:

He says he’d love to be a “hot” woman and “arm candy.”
He “jokes” about how, if beautiful Southern women are called “Southern Belles,” then beautiful Mexican women must be “Taco Bells.”
He says that “physical beauty is within the reach of every woman.” That comment was followed by an picture of the backside of a woman he implies is unattractive.
He points to a graphic saying that women “should not look like butch.”
He offers a beauty tip to women: Look more feminine.
He tells women to stop cutting their hair shorter.

All of that is to say this guy’s been doing the same “schtick” for years. It wasn’t a onetime mistake. It’s his whole thing. Everyone who remains a part of his church is just as guilty of perpetuating this kind of sexist rhetoric as he is.

And if General Baptist Ministries isn’t going to pressure the church to get rid of him, then we can safely assume every church member there shares his disgusting beliefs as well.

I’ve seen a number of comments online focusing on his looks — “like he’s one to talk.” None of that is very helpful because it doesn’t matter who’s delivering the sermon or what they look like. It’s awful no matter what. Focus on the ugliness of the words, not the person delivering them. That’s all.

Here are some other worthy pastoral counseling insights from “man of god”:

A Ugandan pastor took it upon himself to teach “sex education” to his church members trying to boost the sex life of his congregation by using a woman to practice some sex position while his church members watch and laugh in amusement, all the while calling him the “end time pastor.”

Another pastor did a weird thing while counseling married women in his church on how to maintain their marriages by keeping themselves attractive for their husbands even after childbirth by wearing “panties and bra nightie” during his church sermon to show women how to “hypnotize” men by looking sexy.

Prophet Obi O of Anchor of Restoration Church located at Owufuju Street, Asaba Delta State Nigeria was stripped to his underwear by the people who caught him red handed allegedly having “sex deliverance” sessions with a married woman. He was forced to hold his church banner while being paraded around in his underpants.

It seems that Pastors are now “scandal” makers. For example, a Zimbabwean Pastor died shortly after sleeping with a prostitute, while another Pastor poured acid on a woman he was having an affair with and she died, another Pastor was filmed sleeping with one of his married congregants.

The most shocking however, is a Pastor who tried to walk on water like Jesus did, and he drowned in front of his congregants, and another Pastor who asked to be buried alive so that he could resurrect himself like Jesus. Another self confessed Prophet died after fasting in the mountains for 30 days. He was found dead there.

Meanwhile some University students have since left their school and camped in the bush claiming they are waiting for Jesus to come back.

Cervix Individuals

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on August 4, 2020 by andelino

The “American Cancer Society” now recommends that “Individuals With A Cervix” (IWAC) start cervical cancers screening at 25 and continue through age 65 according to their latest guidelines released.

“The cervical cancer screening recommendations say that HPV testing in combination with a Pap test — also known as co-testing– every five years or a Pap test alone every three years are still acceptable options as not all laboratories have transitioned to the primary HPV testing.

Individuals who are 65 and older and have had an adequate negative result in prior screening can stop getting screened. Those with a hysterectomy can also discontinue screening after two consecutive negative HPV tests, two negative co-tests, or three negative Pap tests done within the past 10 years, with the most recent having occurred in the past three to five years. The ACS recommended that individuals who don’t have documentation of prior screening should continue getting screened until they have met this criteria.”

In updating its advice, the ACS used “individuals with a cervix”, rather than “women” in its guidance to appease transgender, non-binary and gender-nonconforming individuals who can also have a cervix.

The phrasing was promptly ridiculed online.

Some people, however, leapt to the defense of the ACS.

They argued that it was “the correct way to phrase that statement” to make it inclusive and inoffensive.

New ACS and BMA medical terms…

According to the British Medical Association do not call pregnant women “expectant mothers” but “pregnant people” instead.

Women who identify as male are not being offered vital routine breast screenings and cervical cancer checks in case it offends them.
Men identifying as women will be invited for cervical smear tests even though they don’t have a cervix.

Individuals with teeth can be either sex.
Individuals with front holes can be either sex.
Individuals with penises can be either sex.
Individuals with prostates can be either sex.
Individuals who menstruate can be either sex.
Individuals with testicles can be either sex.

Confused yet? This for sure will be a “headache” for Bruce Jenner, Rachel Maddow, Rosie O’Donnell, Chaz Bono, Roderick Laverne Cox, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama…plus many others.

Congratulations “Individuals With A Cervix” (IWAC), you have been demoted to “women”… keep voting for Democrats and maybe, with a lot of luck, you may get to identify as “warm-blooded bipedal howler mammals.”

I guess the new “norm” is to identify people by the “sex organs” they have.

Genesis 2:21-25

21 So Mother Gaia caused a deep sleep to fall upon the “Individual without a cervix” and while he/ze/zhe slept took one of his/zis/zir ribs and closed up its place with flesh.
22 And the rib that Mother Gaia had taken from the “Individual without a cervix” he made into a “Individual with a cervix” and brought her/zir/zhe to the “Individual without a cervix.”
23 Then the “Individual without a cervix” said, “This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; sheze/zhe shall be called an “Individual with a cervix.”
24 That is why the “Individual without a cervix” leaves his father and mother and is united to the “Individual with a cervix” and they become one flesh.
25 And both “Individual with a cervix” were naked, and felt no shame.

Just remember “All Cervixes Matter” regardless of the color of your skin.

Get to Know Your Cervix

Women Prefer the AR-15

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on November 13, 2019 by andelino

In the aftermath of a recent Florida “self-defense” shooting, female gun owners argued that the AR-15 provides specific “advantages” to women for home defense, vehemently rejecting the views of “gun-control activists” who insist the firearm is unnecessary.

Five female firearm owners and advocates said the “AR-15 platform” offers several features that are ideal for women specifically.

Robyn M. Sandoval, executive director of “A Girl & A Gun Women’s Shooting League” said the rifle is both more effective and safer for female shooters.

“AR’s are an excellent choice for women for home defense. The platform is relatively lightweight and easy to hold and customize so that the firearm fits her body correctly. Having a rifle that is the right size for the shooter makes it more comfortable to shoot and therefore more accurate and safer.” 

Many Democratic politicians, including 2020 front runner Joe Biden, have long decried the AR-15 as both dangerous and an impractical or unnecessary firearm for civilians, especially women. But the female firearm owners rejected the logic of these pro-gun-control men.

“AR-15s are perfect for women,” Mary Chastain, a writer and gun owner, said. “Despite the size, they are lightweight and have hardly any kickback. This allows us to aim well and shoot the target where we want to.” 

Dana Loesch, a nationally syndicated radio host and gun-rights activist who has faced threats to her safety throughout her career, said she picks an AR-15 when it comes to home defense.

“I was always taught in training that your pistol is what you use to get to your rifle, and the AR-15 is what I choose to use.”

“The customization of the rifle is a big selling point for women,” competitive shooter and trainer Julie Golob said.

“The AR platform can be a useful and effective option for women when it comes to defending themselves and their property. Starting with the fact that the length of pull can be adjusted easily, unlike rifles with fixed stocks, the AR can quickly become custom fit to its user. The pistol grip, combined with quick access to the safety and other controls, makes this platform one a woman can confidently control.” 

“I can choose my trigger, hand guard, barrel length, grip,” Dianna Muller, a former police officer and head of the gun-rights group DC Project, added. “I can put a light, laser, etc. I call it the Mr. Potato Head for the gun connoisseur!” 

The testimony of these women “contradicts” Biden, who has repeatedly claimed that AR-15s are hard to use and “ineffective” compared with shotguns. In 2013, he said he had advised his own wife to use a double-barrel shotgun instead of an AR-15.

“I said, ‘Jill, if there’s ever a problem, just walk out on the balcony here, walk out and put that double-barrel shotgun and fire two blasts outside the house,'” Biden said in an interview with Parents Magazine. “You don’t need an AR-15—it’s harder to aim. It’s harder to use, and in fact you don’t need 30 rounds to protect yourself. Buy a shotgun! Buy a shotgun!” 

Late last month, a heavily pregnant mother did exactly what Biden warned against to “defend” her family. She used an AR-15 to fend off two armed men who were attacking her husband and daughter in their Florida home.

The women disagreed with Biden’s assertions that AR-15s are not necessary. Loesch said she was competent with shotguns, but has found the AR-15 is simply a better option.

“The 12 gauge is an excellent home defense gun, too, but the collateral consideration does affect my decision there (frangible ammo is an option),” Loesch said. “AR-15s are easy to shoulder, lightweight, the low recoil makes it easier to maintain target acquisition, and the ergonomics are great. I can access everything without compromising a defensive stance. I also have more rounds with an AR-15.” 

Chastain also said that she finds the AR-15 easier than many other firearms to use. “You can use it with one hand, which helps me,” she said.

“My entire left side is handicapped, caused by brain trauma at birth. There are many guns I cannot use. The AR is perfect because I can use the functions with only my right hand. The lightness of the gun makes it easy for my handicapped left arm and hand to hold it.” 

The women said the availability of magazines with more “ammunition” capacity than the double-barrel shotguns Biden highlighted—which hold only two rounds—is a significant advantage of the AR platform, as is the variety of ammunition types.

“Standard capacity magazines create a reduced chance to have to fumble to exchange mags under stress,” Julie Golob said.

“The ballistics of defensive ammunition prevent over-penetration, and standard-capacity magazines hold 30 rounds, which is more than a shotgun or pistol,” Sandoval said.

The women who spoke stressed that, while they believe the AR-15 provides them certain advantages over other guns, women are more than able to become skilled with shotguns, handguns, or any other firearm.

“There are pros and cons to any self-defense tool,” Golob said. “Practice on the range and training gun-handling skills, whether it’s a rifle, pistol, or shotgun, is key. I feel that the best home defense option for a woman is the one she is most comfortable with and that she can produce the best results.” 

Sandoval encouraged women to “train extensively on any firearm they choose to use to protect their families” but also noted AR-15 classes are one of the most commonly available—one of its primary advantages in her opinion.

Some of the women also view the imposing nature and reputation of the AR-15 as a bonus feature.

“I also like the fact that they’re scary looking,” Chastain said. “A man breaks into my house, I don’t mind using a scary looking weapon to defend myself.” 

“Ultimately, I want the meanest, most manageable lethal thing I can get” Loesch said.

Breaking Gun Barriers

Hunting Season

Posted in uncategorized with tags , on October 24, 2016 by andelino


Hillary’s Vulgar Mouth

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on June 3, 2016 by andelino

Hillary's Vulgar Mouth 03

This “ill-tempered, violent, foul mouthed, hateful and abusive” woman wants to be your president and have “total control” as Commander-in-Chief of a military that her party so “openly and proudly” detest.

Cheers to the “Truth!”

“Where is the G-damn fucking flag? I want the G-damn fucking flag up every fucking morning at fucking sunrise.”
(From the book “Inside The White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 244 – Hillary to the staff at the Arkansas Governor’s mansion on Labor Day, 1991)

“You sold out, you mother fucker! You sold out!”
(From the book “Inside” by Joseph Califano, p. 213 – Hillary yelling at Democrat lawyer.)

“It’s been said, and I think it’s accurate, that my husband was obsessed by terrorism in general and al-Qaida in particular.”
(Hillary telling a post-9/11 world what a ‘great’ commander in chief her husband was; Dateline, NBC 4/16/2004.)

“I have to admit that a good deal of what my husband and I have learned about Islam has come from our daughter.”
( 8/8/1999 – Hillary at a White House function, proudly tells some Muslim groups she is gaining a greater appreciation of Islam because Chelsea was then taking a class on the “religion of peace.”)

“Fuck off! It’s enough that I have to see you shit-kickers every day, I’m not going to talk to you too!! Just do your G-damn job and keep your mouth shut.”
(From the book “American Evita” by Christopher Anderson, p. 90 – Hillary to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with “Good morning.”)

“Good morning, ma’am,” a member of the uniformed Secret Service once greeted Hillary Clinton. “Fuck off,” she replied.

“If you want to remain on this detail, get your fucking ass over here and grab those bags!”
(From the book “The First Partner” p. 259 – Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident.)

“Get fucked! Get the fuck out of my way!!! Get out of my face!!!”
(From the book “Hillary’s Scheme” p. 89 – Hillary’s various comments to her Secret Service detail agents.)

“Stay the fuck back, stay the fuck away from me! Don’t come within ten yards of me, or else! Just fucking do as I say, Okay!!!?”
(From the book “Unlimited Access”, by Clinton FBI Agent in Charge, Gary Aldrige, p. 139 – Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail.)

“Many of you are well enough off that President Bush’s tax cuts may have helped you. We’re saying that for America to get back on track, we’re probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We’re going to have to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”
(Hillary grandstanding at a fund raising speech in San Francisco; 6/28/2004.)

“Why do I have to keep proving to people that I am not a liar?!”
(From the book “The Survivor,” by John Harris, p. 382 – Hillary in her 2000 Senate campaign)

“You fucking idiot.”
(From the book Crossfire p. 84 – Hillary to a State Trooper who was driving her to an event.)

“Where’s the miserable cock sucker?
(From the book “The Truth About Hillary” by Edward Klein, p. 5 – Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer)

“No matter what you think about the Iraq war, there is one thing we can all agree on for the next days — we have to salute the courage and bravery of those who are risking their lives to vote and those brave Iraqi and American soldiers fighting to protect their right to vote.”
(Was posted on Hillary Clinton’s web site on 1/28/05)

“Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need those sunglasses. We need to go back!”
(From the book “Dereliction of Duty” p. 71-72 – Hillary to Marine One helicopter pilot to turn back while en route to Air Force One.)

“A right-wing network was after his presidency … including perverting the Constitution.”
(To Barbara Walters about the Republicans who impeached her husband; 20/20, ABC 6/8/2003.)

“Son of a bitch.”
(From the book “American Evita” by Christopher Anderson, p. 259 – Hillary’s opinion of President George W. Bush when she found out he secretly visited Iraq just days before her highly publicized trip to Iraq)

“What are you doing inviting these people into my home? These people are our enemies! They are trying to destroy us!”
(From the book “The Survivor” by John Harris, p. 99 – Hillary screaming to an aide, when she found out that some Republicans had been invited to the Clinton White House)

“I mean, you’ve got a conservative and right-wing press presence with really nothing on the other end of the political spectrum.”
(C-Span, 1/19/1997 – Hillary complains about the mainstream media, which are all conservatives in her opinion)

“When are they going to get those fucking retards out of here?!”

Those are said to be the infamous words of Hillary Clinton – also known as Arkansas’ “Mother of the Year” in 1984 – when Hillary reportedly grew frustrated that handicapped children weren’t collecting their Easter eggs quickly enough on the lawn of the Arkansas governor’s mansion.

“Come on Bill, put your dick up! You can’t fuck her here!!”
(From the book “Inside The White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 243 – Hillary to Gov. Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive female at an Arkansas political rally)

“You show people what you’re willing to fight for when you fight your friends.”
(From the book “The Agenda” by Bob Woodward, ch. 14)

“We are at a stage in history in which remolding society is one of the great challenges facing all of us in the West.”
(From the book “I’ve Always Been A Yankee Fan” by Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 119 – During her 1993 commencement address at the University of Texas)

“The only way to make a difference is to acquire power”
(From the book “I’ve Always Been A Yankee Fan” by Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 68 – Hillary to a friend before starting law school.)

“You know, I’m going to start thanking the woman who cleans the restroom in the building I work in. I’m going to start thinking of her as a human being?”
(From the book The Case Against Hillary Clinton by Peggy Noonan, pg. 55)

“We just can’t trust the American people to make those types of choices…. Government has to make those choices for people.”
(From the book “I’ve Always Been A Yankee Fan” by Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 20 – Hillary to Rep. Dennis Hastert in 1993 discussing her expensive, disastrous taxpayer-funded health care plan)

“I am a fan of the social policies that you find in Europe”
(From the book “I’ve Always Been A Yankee Fan” by Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 76 – Hillary in 1996)

Ask yourself, is this the “kind of woman” you want as your leader?

No thanks, America “deserves” a better leader, not a “foul-mouthed” dominatrix!

Hillary's Vulgar Mouth 02

When it comes to Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton addressed the Republican’s remark that President Barack Obama “schlonged” her during the 2008 primary season as follows:

“I really deplore the tone of his campaign, the inflammatory rhetoric that he is using to divide people, and his going after groups of people with hateful, incendiary rhetoric. Nothing really surprises me anymore. I don’t know that he has any boundaries at all. His bigotry, his bluster, his bullying have become his campaign. And he has to keep sort of upping the stakes and going even further.”

Asked if she felt that Trump used a variant of the “Yiddish” word for penis because she is a woman, Clinton demurred.

“I don’t respond to him personally, because he thrives on that kind of exchange. I think he has to answer for what he says, and I assume that others will make the larger point about his language. It’s not the first time he’s demonstrated a penchant for sexism. Again, I’m not sure anybody’s surprised that he keeps pushing the envelope.”

Make No Mistake!

I Will Not Compromise.
I Will Not Comply.
I Will Not Submit.
I Will Not Break.
I Will Not Roll Over.
I Will Not Sit Down.
I Will Not Shut Up.
I Will Not Go Quietly.
I Will Not Give Up.
I Will Not Surrender.
I Will Not Stand For Truth.
I Will Not Protect The Innocent.
I Will Not Sacrifice For Freedom.
I Will Not Defend My Family.

I AM A Soulja of Satan!

“There is a special place in hell for women who vote for Hillary Clinton.”

Hillary’s ‘violent temper’, ‘cusses like a sailor’

Hanging Hillary with her own ugly words

If elected president, Hillary Clinton would try, by executive order if proposed legislation fails, to impose ‘blasphemy’ laws by linking hate speech with violence

Bill Clinton Will Play Major Role on Campaign Trail

Sexual Predators

Posted in sex with tags , , , , , , , , on May 11, 2016 by andelino

Sexual Predators 01

It may not have been “intended” but it was “predictable.” 

Sexual Predators 02

The video below spells out case after case of sexual predators entering women’s “locker, dressing and restrooms” and other private “women only” facilities that are speedily becoming “unprivate,” and demanding to “shower, change and relieve themselves” with them.

One older male “bruiser” wearing an old “lady” wig entered a facility, where a woman sensibly “challenged” him, demanding to “know” why he was there.

She wanted “her” right to privacy.  He “sucker-punched” her causing $60,000 worth of “injuries” to her face.

Sexual Predators 05

There should be a law “if a man claims to be a woman, then we should make it possible to remove all parts that are required to rape or sexually assault a women.”

There is an alleged “right to privacy” in the Constitution. So why can’t women “demand” their right to privacy in “public” facilities?

The video presents other “disturbing” cases.

Sexual Predators 03

There are simply too many “differences” between the sexes.  Yet our society in its “infinite wisdom” seems to be thinking it’s a “civil right.”

Women need to “feel” safe.  And breaking down the “safe space” for a woman at her most vulnerable, while she is “changing, dressing,  showering or going to the bathroom” outside the home, is “insane.”

Her zone of “safety and right to privacy” needs to be “protected” at all times.

Laws that permit males to “invade” that space simply have to be “stopped,” and any law that has already been “implemented” must be repealed.

Enough “is” enough. But never fear.  “Multiculturalism, diversity, and gender neutrality” will save the day.

Sexual Predators 06

Sexual Predators 07

Sexual Predators 08

Sexual Predators 09

US military to consider transgender troops
Federal Court Orders School to Allow Girl to Use Boy’s Restroom

Sex, lies, and bathrooms: Uncovering the truth behind North Carolina’s law
The battle between gender ideology and fact
Target Stores Open Women’s Bathrooms, Changing Rooms to Men
Men’s Room Was Designed for the Penis, Women’s Not So Much
Fed Court Sides with Obama, Forces School to Let Trans Student Choose Bathroom

The New Bathroom diktat

ESPN Social Justice Warriors

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , on May 3, 2016 by andelino
Curt Schilling 04

Curt Schilling, former “Major League Baseball” pitcher who won three “World Series” titles and ESPN Baseball Analyst Broadcaster.

I guess the below “transaction” was a FEC filing that Curt had to fill out when he “donated” money to an election campaign.

Obviously he “knew” for some time that his days at “ESPN” would come to an end “sooner than later.”

Curt Schilling 05

ESPN’s “Social Justice Warriors” disliked him because he won’t stop being the “truthful”  uncle re-tweeting  “memes” on Facebook, but he’s not “walking” away.

There won’t be an “amicable” split where everyone is “still friends.” You want me gone, “fire me” because I’m not “leaving” as long as the “checks” keep clearing,

Curt Schilling 01

And promptly, the former “Major League Baseball” pitcher who won three “World Series” titles as a pitcher with the Arizona Diamondbacks and the Boston Red Sox was “sacked” from his job as a “baseball analyst” by ESPN’s “Social Justice Warriors.”

ESPN released a statement saying Schilling was no longer “welcome” as a broadcaster. “ESPN is an inclusive company. Curt Schilling has been advised that his conduct was unacceptable and his employment with ESPN has been terminated.”

What was the “final” straw that “broke” the camel’s back?

Schilling “re-tweeted” this meme on Facebook showing a large man “wearing” a wig and women’s clothing.

Curt Schilling 03

The “re-tweet” was apparently in response to the “controversy” over the North Carolina “bathroom bill” law which serves as a noteworthy example of “fair and rational legislation to protect society’s most vulnerable members.”

H.B. 2 is a “pro-freedom and democracy” law that applies “only” to government-run facilities, liberating “private institutions, small businesses, and charities” from coercion by the state.

Schilling was previously “suspended” by ESPN’s “Social Justice Warriors” last year after he “re-tweeted”  a meme about Nazis and Muslims.

Curt Schilling 06

Here is Curt Schilling’s response after getting “attacked” by the mainstream media for being a “racist”

Curt Schilling 02

This is likely the easiest way to address all of you out there who are just dying to be offended so you can create some sort of faux cause to rally behind.

Let’s make one thing clear right up front. If you get offended by ANYTHING in my post, that’s your fault, all yours.

And for you people too dense to understand this one very important thing. My opinion, 100% mine, and only mine. I don’t represent anyone but myself here, on Facebook, on Twitter, anywhere.

1.The Nazis/Muslims meme the world decided to rally behind that I posted months ago. The meme that some of you clowns and more of you spineless looking to be offended folks turned into something it was not. Every one of you gutless cowards, when ‘calling me out’ or calling me a racist, every one of you left out the only word in that entire meme that mattered. You had to, otherwise you’d have had to go elsewhere to find offense and create something out of nothing. Let me help you now. All of you fraudulent media folks, you lazy ass “don’t actually want to work for a story” clowns. The word you left out? The ONLY word that mattered? EXTREMIST. That word being omitted creates two completely different posts with two very different meanings. I don’t dislike or hate Muslims, or people of the Islamic faith. Ask my friends that are both. But then again you all knew that, but when you omit the word EXTREMIST you create a person that doesn’t exist and have a story with traction, even if it is a complete lie.

2.This latest brew is laughingly beyond hilarious. I didn’t post that ugly looking picture. I “re-tweeted” a meme about the basic functionality of men’s and women’s restrooms, period.

See here’s the thing. I do NOT care what color you are, what race, what sex, who you sleep with, what you wear. I don’t care and I never have. I have opinions, but they’re just that, opinions. And opinions are like buttholes, everyone has one and they usually stink.

You know how I know you ‘offended’ people are full of crap? Because I’m not even close to any of the things you so desperately want me to be, so you can whine.

I’m loud, I talk too much, I think I know more than I do, those and a billion other issues I know I have. Like everyone of you I have flaws, but I’m ok with my flaws, they’re what make me, me. I thank the Lord for the life I’ve been given. A life interspersed and occupied by men and women who are gay, by people of all races and religions, by men and women who dress as the other, by men and women who’ve changed to women and men. Not one decision I’ve ever made about a person has anything to do with those things I just mentioned, nor will it ever.

You frauds out there ranting and screaming about my ‘opinions’ (even if it isn’t) and comments are screaming for “tolerance” and “acceptance” while you refuse to do and be either.

YOU’RE the ones making it the issue. I don’t care, if you ask me about any of the topics it’s likely (much to the chagrin of many) I’ll answer with my opinion.

There are things I have deeply held beliefs in, things I have that are core to who I am, things I am passionate about. If you ask me about them it’s likely I’ll give you a passionate answer, whether you like that answer or not is completely up to you. I am not going to give you answers to make sure you like what I say, let the rest of the insecure world do that.

But let me reiterate, I don’t care who, what, where or why you are who you are. I care about people and how they treat others. You will NEVER in your lives find a single person who’s met me/knows me who would ever say I treated them as anything other than a human. None.

Wouldn’t you assume that all of you offended folks would have heard of me treating people the way you needed me to treat them, to be what you so desperately want me to be? If people want to create stories or impressions where there are none, and you want/need to get offended by them that’s on you.

But for now, if you want to be offended and have that offense be by something you THINK you interpreted or you THINK you heard, go for it.

But for the love of God stop making crap up, it’s boring and it’s stupid and there are actual causes that need attention such as homeless veterans and our archaic education system.

Two benefits of this I didn’t foresee. 1) Twitter has made their “Block” far easier to use. 2) You find out who your friends are when folks create crisis about you, that actually aren’t.

Curt Schilling 00

On the “transgender” issue I’m with Schilling. It’s just makes “common” sense.

If you have a “penis” you should use a stall in the men’s room.

If you have a “vagina” you should use a stall in the ladies room.

It doesn’t mean I “dislike” transgenders, it just means I don’t think making one person “comfortable” should come at the “expense” of making another one “uncomfortable.”

Here are some more Curt Schilling’s “I’m not being racist I’m just sharing truth” memes…

Curt Schilling 07

Curt Schilling 08

Curt Schilling 09

Curt Schilling 10

Curt Schilling 11

Curt Schilling 12

Curt Schilling 13

Curt Schilling: Won’t Engage in Political Correctness For Hall of Fame Slot
Curt Schilling – After the Tweets

Islamic Theology of Rape

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on March 17, 2016 by andelino

Islamic Theology of Rape 01

Islamic State (ISIS) jihadists force “birth control pills and injections” on captives – often just young girls – so they can “trade” them as the spoils of war.

The practice emerged as an “interpretation” of Islamic law that bans them from sex with “pregnant” slaves.

According to a new report in the New York Times published on Saturday, three dozen “escaped” Yazidi women agreed to be interviewed about being forced to take birth control — either in pill form, or injection, sometimes both — by ISIS fighters.

Islamic Theology of Rape 02

The reason for the “forced” birth control, the report says, is due to an “obscure” law cited by ISIS extremists that says a man may have “sex” with his female “slave,” as long as she is not “pregnant.”

In order to “ensure” the young women do not become “pregnant” while they are repeatedly “raped and passed” between the fighters, the ISIS operatives either “force feed” them birth control pills, inject them with the “Depo-Provera shot” — an injectable contraceptive — send them to hospitals to “receive” the shot, or, in some cases, force “both forms”of birth control on them.

Islamic Theology of Rape 03

Islamic State leaders have made “sexual slavery” as they believe it was “practiced” during the Prophet Muhammad’s time integral to the group’s operations, preying on the women and girls the group captured from the “Yazidi” religious minority almost two years ago.

To keep the “sex trade” running, the fighters have aggressively “pushed” birth control on their “victims” so they can continue the “abuse” and “rape” unabated while the women are “passed” among them.

Islamic Theology of Rape 04

A 16-year-old girl, going only by the initial M, “spoke” with the New York Times about her time in “captivity,” and how she had become conditioned to “fear” nightfall, because it meant she would soon be “raped” again.

Not long after the ISIS fighter “bought” M, he brought her a box of “birth control pills” — though she didn’t know that was what they were — and forced her to “take one every day.”

Islamic Theology of Rape 05

“Every day, I had to swallow one in front of him. He gave me one box per month. When I ran out, he replaced it. When I was sold from one man to another, the box came with me.”

Islamic Theology of Rape 06

Even the small minority of women who did end up becoming “pregnant” at the hands of their “rapists” weren’t free from harm. At least one woman was forced to get an “abortion” so ISIS operatives could continue to “rape” her, while others described how they were “pressured” to get abortions, even being “force-fed” a version of the “morning-after pill.”

Islamic Theology of Rape 07


It is not permissible for the owner of a female captive to have intercourse with her until after she has had menstrual cycle and becomes clean.
If she does not menstruate and is pregnant, he is not allowed to have intercourse with her until after she has given birth.
It is not permissible to cause her to abort if she is pregnant.
If the owner of a female captive releases her, only he can have intercourse with her and he cannot allow someone else to have intercourse with her.
If the owner of a female captive, who has a daughter suitable for intercourse, has sexual relations with the latter, he is not permitted to have intercourse with her mother and she is permanently off limits to him. Should he have intercourse with her mother then he is not permitted to have intercourse with her daughter and she is to be off-limits to him.
The owner of two sisters is not allowed to have intercourse with both of them; rather he may only have intercourse with just one. The other sister is to be had by him, if he were to relinquish ownership of the first sister by selling her, giving her away or releasing her
If the female captive is owned by a father, his son cannot have intercourse with her and vice-versa. Moreover, intercourse with his wife’s female captive is also not permissible
If a father had intercourse with his female captive then gave her away or sold her to his son, he is no longer permitted to have intercourse with her
If the female captive becomes pregnant by her owner, he cannot sell her and she is released after his death
If the owner releases his female captive then he is not permitted to have intercourse with her afterwards because she has become free and is no longer his property
If two or more individuals are involved in purchasing a female captive, none of them are permitted to have sex with her because she is part of a joint ownership
It is not permissible to have intercourse with a female captive during her menstrual cycle
It is not permissible top have anal sex with a female captive
The owner of a female captive should show compassion towards her, be kind to her, not humiliate her and not assign her work she is unable to perform
The owner of a female captive should not sell her to an individual whom he knows will treat her badly or do unto her what Allah has forbidden

Islamic Theology of Rape 08

Muslims say they will make it legal to rape white women when they take over Europe

Women Military Draft

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on February 11, 2016 by andelino

Do you feel a Draft 00

Defense Secretary Ash Carter announced he would “lift” the military’s ban on women “serving in combat,” a move that allows hundreds of thousands of women to serve in front-line positions during wartime. “This means that as long as they qualify and meet the standards, women will now be able to contribute to our mission in ways they could not before. They’ll be able to drive tanks, give orders, lead infantry soldiers into combat,” Secretary Carter said at a news conference.

Ash Carter

Top officers in the Army and Marine Corps followed that policy to its logical “conclusion” and told Congress that it is time for women to “register for future military drafts.”

This would be a “radical” change since, as the New York Times notes,

“Selective Service laws have never required women to subject themselves to the draft and face the prospect of being forced into military service. The current version of the Military Selective Service Act requires that virtually all men in the United States between the ages of 18 and 26 register, most within 30 days of turning 18. That includes non-U.S. citizens living in the United States, such as refugees.”

If we are going to have a “military” draft and women are “eligible” for combat (an idea I oppose), then it’s only fair that women be “forced to serve” alongside men. But perhaps it’s time we “abolish” the idea of military “conscription” altogether.

Do you feel a Draft 02

Our Constitution requires Congress to “raise and support Armies” in order to “provide for the common defense.” What it doesn’t specify, however, is how the military should be “raised.” There are, in fact, only three options available: “all-volunteer, forced conscription, or some combination of the two.” Currently, our military is an “all-volunteer” which is the most “moral” method.

We have an all-volunteer military largely because of free market economist Milton Friedman. At the height of the Vietnam War, U.S. commander Gen. William Westmoreland testified before the President’s Commission on an “All-Volunteer Force,” a commission that was exploring the feasibility of ending the military draft. As Newsday reported,

“Staunchly opposed to an all-volunteer military, which must pay its soldiers market wages, Gen. Westmoreland proclaimed that he did not want to command ‘an army of mercenaries. One of the commission members immediately shot back with a question: General, would you rather command an army of slaves?’”

Friedman based his “arguments” primarily on the need for “freedom” in human flourishing. But he also noted its effects on the lower classes:

“A by-product of freedom to serve would be avoidance of the present arbitrary discrimination among different groups. A large faction of the poor are rejected on physical or mental grounds. The relatively well-to-do used to be in an especially good position to take advantage of the possibilities of deferment offered by continuing their schooling. Hence the draft bears disproportionately on the upper lower classes and the lower middle classes. The fraction of high-school graduates who serve is vastly higher than of either those who have gone to college or those who dropped out before finishing high school.”

Do you feel a Draft 03

Some people, however, agree with Friedman and yet believe an “all-volunteer force” is less moral than conscription for much the same reason he opposes it. They would argue that people on the “lower rungs” of the socio-economic ladder are more likely to be “attracted” to military service, while the “upper classes” have more options available to them and would therefore have less “incentive” to join.

We can call this the “burden model” since it implies that the burden of military service is “disproportionately” shared by the “lower” economic groups.

There are two problems I have with this “burden model” of military service. The first is the way it “reduces” service to one’s country to a matter of “economics.” Those with fewer choices for “jobs or education” are more likely to “enlist” while those who have “money” have more options to “choose” from. Under this view, the military is attractive to those with “limited” opportunities but those with a broader range of selections will find it “significantly” less alluring.

Do you feel a Draft 05

While it may be true that the “poor and lower middle class” make up the bulk of the military, I don’t think the “unequal” representation of the socio-economic classes is “inherently” immoral. I was on the “borderline” between poor and lower middle class when I “joined” the Marines in 1988. But economic advancement was not the “reason” I joined, or why I “stayed” in for 15 years. Nor was it the reason most people I knew joined the military.

But even if it were “true” that most people joined for “economic” reasons I would still “reject” the burden model since it “implies” that that the system is “immoral” when it is the people making the “choice” who are morally flawed.

Which brings me to the second problem with the model. It concludes that since military service is a burden, “moral” considerations require that the load be “shared” as equally as possible. Again, I must point out that this “view” is not inherently wrong. But where I think the “flaw in reasoning lies” is that it puts the focus on the ethical “choice” rather the ethical “chooser.”

Do you feel a Draft 07

The “burden” of military service is akin to that of a person who chooses to “adopt” a child. While choosing to become a mother or father has obvious “economic” consequences, few people see that as the “sole” reason for adopting an “unwanted or abandoned” child. Before they are adopted, “orphans” are cared for by the state and are, therefore, the “collective responsibility” of all citizens. But when someone steps “forward and agrees” to take the child into their home, the “burden of responsibility” shifts mainly onto the shoulders of the “new” parent. Although the state may still have some “obligations,” the parent assumes the “primary” childcare duties.

We do not, however, consider the “system” to be immoral because the state does not “force” people to take in orphans. Instead, we allow people with the requisite virtues, “love, compassion, self-sacrifice,” to freely and willingly choose to take this “burden” upon themselves.

The same holds true for those who “serve” in the military. Currently, our nation “does not and should not” force the obligation of “national defense” on those who do not willing “choose” to take it upon themselves. Instead, we “allow” those who possess certain moral virtues, “courage, honor, commitment,” to heed the call of duty.

Do you feel a Draft 08

Not all who serve, of course, do so for the “purest of motives.” There is no shortage of “scholarship mercenaries” who joined only to gain money for “college” or as a means of improving their “lot” in life. But these people, no matter how large their number, are not the “heart and soul” of our military. The core is comprised of men and women who truly “love” their country and love the people and the “ideals” for which our nation stands so much that they are willing to “sacrifice and bear” any burden in order to ensure its survival.

As a Christian I believe that since no one meets the standards of “goodness” set by God, no one should be excessively “proud” of their virtue. Compared to the “ultimate” standard, even the greatest of “saints” falls short. But this view should not be mistaken as an “endorsement” of moral egalitarianism. All men are created “equal” and should be afforded the same “human” rights, but not all men are equally “virtuous.” The cost of liberty is not “paid” by everyone equally; it is a “debt” assumed by a select few.

Do you feel a Draft 06

Wannabee Marine reject Hillary Clinton.

If Americans truly “value” freedom as much as they “claim,” then the military should be more “difficult” to get into than any “Ivy-league” school. The “elite” would be lined up around the block, letters of recommendation in hand, hoping to “enlist and serve” in the greatest military in the history of the world. But in our nation, the “elite” is based not on “virtues” such as courage, duty, and self-sacrifice, but rather on “money, power, and education.”

That is why the “draft” is neither necessary nor desirable. For while it might force the “wealthy and privileged” to share the “burden” of duty, conscription has never been needed to “attract” the virtuous. If the United States ever “reaches” that point, if we are get to a stage when we no longer produce “enough” men and women to heed the call to “defend” our country, then we will no longer have a “country” worth defending.

Do you feel a Draft 01

Pentagon to Let Women Serve in All U.S. Combat Positions
Girls with Guns: Women and the Draft
Should females be forced to register for the military draft?
Don’t Let Hillary Draft Your Daughter
Hillary Clinton and drafting women
Hillary Under Fire
Time for Chelsea Clinton to get drafted?

Passing as a Woman

Posted in sex with tags , , , , , , , , on December 18, 2015 by andelino

Ally of the Year 01

Bruce Jenner had no idea the “minefield” he stepped into when he decided to “pass as a woman.”

The slightest “deviation” from approved language or thought lands you in deep “trouble” with the paladins monitoring the ramparts of the “new normal.”

Jenner placed seventh in Time Magazine’s “Person of the Year” and offered an interview to the magazine in which he said he tried to project a “good image” for the trans community.

What did he “mean” by that?

“One thing that has always been important for me, and it may seem very self-absorbed or whatever, is first of all your presentation of who you are. I think it’s much easier for a trans woman or a trans man who authentically kind of looks and plays the role. So what I call my presentation. I try to take that seriously.”

“I think it puts people at ease. If you’re out there and, to be honest with you, if you look like a man in a dress, it makes people uncomfortable. So the first thing I can do is try to present myself well. I want to dress well. I want to look good. When I go out, as Kim says, you’ve got to rock it because the paparazzi will be there. The second thing I want to do in living my life authentically is be intelligent on the subject. Hopefully as time goes on I’ll learn more and more and more and get better at that.”

That was “enough” to set off trannies “alarm” bells.

“Queer Latino” writer Matthew Rodrequez, at Identities.Mic wrote,

“Jenner is essentially talking about the idea of ‘passing’, which is not always the goal of every transgender person. The pressure to ‘pass,’ to fit society’s idea of what a cisgender man or cisgender woman looks like, weighs heavy on many trans people.”

Jenner was “scolded” for having the “resources” to at least roughly “resemble” a woman.


The “condemnatory” tweets came “fast and furious”

“Yep. Caitlyn Jenner is becoming outright harmful to trans women.” — Sophia Banks (@sophiaphotos) December 12, 201

“I just read that article with Caitlyn Jenner saying trans women have to try as hard as possible to appease cis folks. Not look like men. SMH” — Sophia Banks (@sophiaphotos) December 12, 2015

“Caitlyn Jenner is pretty much attacking low income trans women and women like me who are visibly trans. Reminds me of 90’s websites I read” — Sophia Banks (@sophiaphotos) December 12, 2015

“Not here for Caitlyn Jenner saying you appease cisnormativity or you are a failure. Fuck that. Everything I stand against as a trans woman” — Sophia Banks (@sophiaphotos) December 12, 2015

“Fuck Caitlyn Jenner and her shitting on other trans women. I’m DONE with her reality TV media time suck bullshit.” — Mari Brighe (@MariBrighe) December 11, 2015

It may take a while for new “trannies” to get the hang of “acceptable” lingo.

Chastity Bono, now living as a “man” named Chaz, got into a “spat” with Kathlyn Elizabeth Beatty, the “daughter” of Warren Beatty and Annette Benning, now living as a “man” named Stephen Ira.

Passing as a Woman 01

Chastity Bono, now living as a man named Chaz.

Bono compared his “transgenderism” to being born with a “cleft” palate.

Passing as a Woman 02

Stephen Ira Beatty calls himself “a trans man, a faggy queen, a homosexual, a queer, a nerd fighter, a writer, an artist and a guy who needs a haircut.”

Stephen Ira Beatty “wrote” on his blog,

“I do not have a birth defect. If you feel like you have a birth defect, fine. That’s how you feel. Go feel that. Do not put it onto me. Do not define me that way, and do not define other trans people that way unless they claim that label.”

The new “transgender” world is a forever a “changing” mine-field.

%d bloggers like this: