Archive for white supremacy

Evolution Is White Supremacy

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on July 21, 2021 by andelino
“Detail of the first book of the Bible, Genesis”

Forty percent of Americans believe God created humans in His image within the past 10,000 years. The rest believe humans evolved over millions of years, with or without God’s guidance. Most college-educated people believe the “hypothesis of evolution” is a rational explanation for creation. So it should not be surprising that a popular science magazine like the “Scientific American” espouses it. What is surprising is the level of vitriol this publication levels at anyone who questions evolution.

On July 5, the “Scientific American” published an editorial by Allison Hopper, a white lady, titled “Denial of Evolution Is a Form of White Supremacy.” Since Hopper cannot accept that anyone would ever doubt evolution on scientific or religious grounds, she argues that creationists reject evolution because they are racists.

“I want to unmask the lie that evolution denial is about religion and recognize that at its core, it is a form of white supremacy that perpetuates segregation and violence against black bodies,” she wrote.

“In literal interpretations of the Christian Bible, white skin was created in God’s image. Dark skin has a different, more problematic origin. As the biblical story goes, the curse or mark of Cain for killing his brother was a darkening of his descendants’ skin. Historically, many congregations in the U.S. pointed to this story of Cain as evidence that black skin was created as a punishment. The fantasy of a continuous line of white descendants segregates white heritage from black bodies. In the real world, this mythology translates into lethal effects on people who are Black. Fundamentalist interpretations of the Bible are part of the ‘fake news’ epidemic that feeds the racial divide in our country.”

Now, Hopper is partially correct that some Protestant denominations in the United States formerly taught that Cain was marked with black skin. But this belief is no longer prevalent, and it never came from the Bible. In Genesis 4:15, the Hebrew word for “mark” is “owth”, and it indicates a boundary marker that God set up to separate Cain and his family from the rest of humanity after he murdered his brother Abel.

You can read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find anything justifying the belief that any race or ethnicity is inferior to another. The Old Testament refers to Eve as “the mother of all living” (Genesis 3:20); the New Testament says God “made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth” (Acts 17:26). Yet just as God created varieties within different plants and animals—with artistry and purpose—He created varieties of people.

“God does not reveal in the Bible the precise origin of the different races. But it is a fair conjecture that in mother Eve were created ovaries containing the yellow and black genes, as well as white, so that some of the children of Adam and Eve gave rise to black, yellow, as well as white.”

Despite Hopper’s protestation, the Bible teaches that God “made of one blood all nations of men.” It is evolution that teaches that some “races are inferior.”

The alternate title for Charles Darwin’s book “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection” was “The Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life.” Its premise was that only the fittest races survive. This book’s sequel, “The Descent of Man”, argued that some races were superior to others.

Throughout “The Descent of Man”, Darwin labeled various races as inferior to Europeans. In one passage, he said he would rather be descended from an “old baboon” than from South American Indian. In another passage, he predicted the extinction of the African races: “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”

Yet according to the Scientific American, creationists are “white supremacists” because they reject a theory formulated by a man who believed that blacks and Aboriginals were barely more evolved than gorillas. And they are racists because they cling to a religion that teaches that all races were created in the image of God.

Charles Darwin’s cousin, Francis Galton, used the ideas elucidated in “The Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life” to start the eugenics movement. This movement sought to improve humanity by excluding inferior people from the gene pool. Imperial Germany used tenets of social Darwinism and eugenics to justify the genocide of “inferior” races in Africa. National Socialist Germany used principles of social Darwinism and eugenics to justify the genocide of the Jewish people. And whether they realize it or not, those racial activists espousing critical race theory today are channeling this same Darwinian spirit when they substituted race conflict for class conflict in their quest to create a revolutionary coalition of ethnic minorities against a white majority.

Those who follow the Bible know that morality is God’s definition of right and wrong. But those who believe in evolution think morality is an invention of the human mind. Therefore, evolutionists believe humans can alter the definition of right and wrong at will because they are the authority that invented right and wrong in the first place.

After all, if humans are only the most sophisticated of the apes, then the rule of law must give way to the law of the jungle. “The strong rule the weak; only the fittest survive.”

Race war, genocide and other serious problems are not caused by “literal interpretations” of the Bible but are instead caused by society’s rejection of “literal interpretations” of the Bible.

“Higher education during the 20th century has come, with virtual unanimity, to accept the evolutionary theory. Higher education contemptuously ignores, without any consideration whatsoever, the biblical truths revealing man’s presence on the Earth and the causes of the present state of civilization. Education in the civilized world today has become entirely materialistic. Education has become a combination of the agnosticism of evolution, the politics and economics of Karl Marx, and the morals and social patterns of Sigmund Freud. Higher education remains in utter ignorance of the mystery of mankind and of human civilization.”

Until humanity comes to understand the mystery of mankind and of human civilization and accepts God’s inexorable spiritual law as static, stationary, eternal and unchanging, we stand in great danger. Unless the Creator, whose existence evolutionists so adamantly deny, intervenes to save this world’s sick society, social Darwinism and moral relativism will lead to the extinction of all life on Earth.

In the meantime, The Scientific American, claims it is “racist” to believe in Adam and Eve.

The Lone Defender

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on August 12, 2020 by andelino

When President Trump decided he would speak at Mount Rushmore on the eve of “Independence Day” to commemorate the birth of the United States, the “cancel culture mob” and the media immediately expanded its “onslaught “on American history to target one of this nation’s “greatest” monuments.

Look closely at the reaction of the leftist mainstream media. Listen closely at the words of President Trump’s speech. There is something massive, something inevitable, churning in America. It is impossible that it won’t affect you and me.

Mount Rushmore National Memorial depicts U.S. presidents “George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln,” 60-foot-high sculptures in a granite South Dakota mountainside. The sculptor chose these four men to represent the “birth, growth, development and preservation of this nation.”

During the most recent election, when Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders visited, he stared admiringly at the monument and said, “This is our country at its very best.” CNN associated Sanders with the “majesty” of a monument of “four great American presidents.”

But reporting on President Trump’s July 3 visit, this same news organization called Rushmore “a monument of two slave owners and on land wrestled away from Native Americans.” The New York Times characterized these presidents as having a complicated legacy and said the monument is built on “stolen land by a racist sculptor with ties to the Ku Klux Klan.”

Other news organizations are also repeating the idea that Mount Rushmore celebrates “slavery, racism and white supremacy;” they are amplifying the debate over tearing it down; and they are associating “racism” with these past presidents so that they can associate “racism” with the current president.

Where are the “defenders” of America’s history?

President Trump’s Mount Rushmore speech was a good answer to that question. Between the “cancel culture mob” and the destruction of American history stands one man: Donald Trump. But it wasn’t just the visual of President Trump standing before those scorned presidents: “It was also the content of his speech.”

I encourage you to “read” the entirety of President Trump’s speech of July 3, 2020.

This was a “wartime” speech! This was a response to a “domestic enemy” that is attacking American institutions from within! And before you even read what President Trump said, you can deduce from the outright “hostility” of the news media reaction that it was the most “impactful speech of his presidency” thus far.

On the Joy Reid show on MSNBC, guests slammed the speech, with one calling the setting at Mount Rushmore “the most grandiose symbol of U.S. imperialism on Earth.” Guest host Tiffany Cross said the Fourth of July was a celebration of independence for “white men.”

The Washington Post published “It Is Time to Reconsider the Global Legacy of July 4, 1776,” in which author Elizabeth Kolsky revised American history in an attempt that would have made American socialist historian Howard Zinn proud. Her piece struggles to make any sense, but she made sure to drop in some attention-grabbers, like claiming that American democracy “was founded as a slave society.”

Think about what we are facing now compared to just one month ago. In one month, “radical leftists” like these reporters have come out in force to convince us that Mount Rushmore, the American flag, the national anthem and the Fourth of July itself are “evil symbols of white supremacy.”

If you accept those symbols—as the huge majority of Americans have accepted those symbols for the huge majority of American history—you are now a “racist.” If you defend those symbols, as President Trump is doing, leftists will compare you to members of the “Ku Klux Klan.”

Search for “Trump” and “Rushmore” on the Internet, and look at the way the main stories from the main news organizations characterize the visit: “Trump Pushes Racial Division, Flouts Virus Rules at the Foot of Mount Rushmore” (Associated Press); “Trump Uses Fourth of July Celebration to Stoke a Culture War” (Los Angeles Times); “Trump Uses Mount Rushmore Speech to Deliver Divisive Culture War Message” (New York Times); “At Mount Rushmore, Trump Digs Deeper Into Nation’s Divisions” (U.S. News); “Trump Plumbed New Depths of Depravity This Fourth of July” (Washington Post editorial board).

The Post said the president chose to center his reelection campaign “on appeals to racism,” that his speech was an “unhinged attack on the movement for racial and social justice,” and that he “poses the greatest threat to American democratic values.” The journalists and editors of the largest and most powerful news organizations in America called President Trump’s speech outrageous,” divisive,” fascist and more.

At this point, it’s obvious that America is in a “cultural” civil war! And it’s no exaggeration to say that reading the major news media, you would think that President Trump started it! You would think that what he is doing is crazy, outrageous and dangerous. But what are these “outrageous” and “divisive” actions of his? He dares to “defend” American presidents, the American flag, American institutions and American history.

The fact that this is “controversial” tells you which side is “radical”, which side is “divisive”, which side is weaponizing “race”, which side is on the “attack”, which side is deeply “depraved”, which side is the greatest “threat.”

The Wall Street Journal editorial board is one of the few to publish what should be obvious and not even controversial. It wrote that Mr. Trump’s July 3 address was “one of the best speeches of his presidency” and that it was “only divisive if you haven’t been paying attention to the divisions now being stoked on the political left across American institutions.”

Radical leftists are “rabidly, vulgarly, destructively” desecrating the memories, the histories and the principles left to us by Washington, Jefferson, Roosevelt, Lincoln and the other great Americans. They are attacking the “principles of the Constitution.” They are attacking even the basic “human concept of rule of law!” And they say it’s President Trump who is “divisive?”

This aggressive reaction to President Trump’s July 3 speech tells you a lot about the “radical left.” It is now powerful enough and bold enough to openly “assault” American history and American “principles” en masse. It is now audacious enough to claim that “destroying” American history unifies us, and “defending” American history divides us.

Melanie Phillips summed it up succinctly: “Trump wasn’t stoking a culture war or exploiting social divisions. He was instead responding to the culture war now being waged upon core American and Western values of freedom of expression and the rule of law, and declaring that he would not allow it to succeed.” 

If you’ve been paying attention to the news even over just the last month, you know that the president is responding to an all-out “assault” on America’s history, government and culture. And you know that in that battle, “he stands alone.”

President Trump was bold enough to say publicly and frankly what is underway in America. “Our nation is witnessing a merciless campaign to wipe out our history, defame our heroes, erase our values, and indoctrinate our children,” he said, adding that the “cancel culture” intimidation movement is “driving people from their jobs, shaming dissenters, and demanding total submission from anyone who disagrees.”

“This is the very definition of totalitarianism.” He also said, “The radical ideology attacking our country advances under the banner of social justice, but in truth, it would demolish both justice and society. Make no mistake. This left-wing cultural revolution is designed to overthrow the American Revolution.” And he warned: “Their goal is not a better America; their goal is to end America.”

These statements are true! They’re not even that controversial. Look at the news: “Do you see defamation, indoctrination, totalitarianism, radical ideology, a cultural revolution?” What you are seeing is an attempt to end America! A higher authority than President Trump has revealed that to be the case, as we’ll see in a moment.

Mr. Trump has gotten closer to “exposing” this problem, and has taken a stronger “stand” against it, than any other politician in America. He is exposing the leftists’ “motives”, and it is driving them “insane.”

Don’t think that it’s just rioters and wacky activists who are fighting this revolution. It’s people leading massive news organizations, mammoth technology companies, higher education, extensive spy agencies, the powerful deep state. They are making hate-filled, rabid socialism the new authority, and constitutional, moral tradition the new dissent. 

Do you think this is only the usual political bickering? Do you think that this is not leading to an actual, violent revolution? Do you think America is immune from that? Do you think this will just go away? Do you think this won’t affect you?

A month ago, did you think you were “racist because you like the American flag?” Things are changing fast in America. This “culture war” has been building for a long time, and now it is breaking out into the open. But it has only begun to affect your life!

And the “conservatives” are losing that war. Most of the powerful ones aren’t bold enough to expose this “radical” movement for what it is! Many of them are too “afraid” of the mob. Yet President Trump, for all practical purposes alone, is boldly “confronting” it.

For eight years under President Obama, the forces of the “radical” left were on the march, virtually unchecked. Even Republican leaders “caved” in, and that was after they had taken “control” of Congress and had a lot of “power” to stop the president!

Donald Trump has proved himself willing to “take a stand” where others have not. It is quite something to behold him “resisting” these anti-American forces! He has “inspired” a few other leaders to “challenge” the radical left and help expose it for what it is.

When you compare what this president is doing to what his predecessor did, there has been a “clear” change in direction, one that will “slow” the speed at which America is being “pulled” apart. He is not “trashing” the Constitution as Obama did.

President Trump is taking a stand. What if Obama’s chosen successor had won the presidency in 2016? Imagine the “cancel-culture mob, the statue-destroyers, the rioters having free reign over the nation, aided and abetted not only by the media, education and the deep state but by the highest office in the land!”

Had Hillary Clinton been elected, the “destructive” trends that unfolded during the Obama presidency would have continued “unchecked”, and they surely would have intensified. Many people believe it would have meant an “end to our constitutional republic!”

Notice what Melanie Philips wrote following Mr. Trump’s speech on July 3:

“I still believe as I did in November 2016 that if Mr. Trump were to lose the presidential election to the Democratic Party, America and the West would be lost. The slim chance of their surviving this great crisis for civilization would be snuffed out altogether if the morally bankrupt and venomously West-bashing left were to come to power in America.”

It’s almost inevitable, not that America will survive, but that it will be blotted out! That’s what this noted journalist is saying. And when America falls, free civilization will fall!

Read the president’s speech. He is warning the American people that they are in a “fight for the survival of the nation!”

The people who want to “tear it apart” have become numerous and extremely powerful. They want to put you under their rule. The fact that they are now bringing that agenda out into the open means they are confident that they now have enough power to openly challenge not just certain issues or political parties but everything about American government, culture and history!

They are seething with “hatred”, attacking anyone who stands in their way by accusing them of being “divisive” and UN-American! This twisted “hatred” is not going to just leave you alone and eventually disappear.

There is something “powerful” going on. President Trump knows it, but he can’t tell you exactly what is “causing” it. In fact, he and the others who are trying to “resist” this attack can’t tell you what made America “great” in the first place or why people “hate” it so much. Even the “radicals” themselves can’t tell you the fundamental “reason” they think the way they do!

The good things about America and its history came from God! And the raging “hatred” against those blessings comes from Satan! This is not just about people’s “politics”, this is about their “attitudes.” This has to do with their “spirit!”

That is why President Trump is the only one “brave” enough to confront the mob. It is critical that we “realize” why this resurgence! God Himself is pushing back against the Satan inspired forces that want to “destroy” this nation! He is exposing those forces so we can see them clearly. And He is using a man to “save” the United States for the time being.

People are beginning to “realize” what is happening in America. They are beginning to “recognize” that America’s enemies, foreign and domestic, are extremely powerful. They are beginning to realize that “radical socialism” is attempting to blot out this country!

And they admit that there is just no rational explanation for what is happening. They can see the results of a rampaging “spirit of hate” raging through the streets of America which will affect all of us, but they don’t recognize the “spirit of hate” itself, and they don’t realize that that “spirit” comes from a very real spirit being. They don’t understand God or what He is doing. They don’t realize that He is just as active in current events as He was in ancient events.

You need to understand what it is, where it comes from, what it’s surging toward. Start by reading your Bible and decide whether it reveals the reality of what is now erupting all around us.

Jesus Statues Be Removed

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on July 2, 2020 by andelino

White “Black Lives Matter” activist Shaun King called for the removal of statues, murals and stained glass windows that depict Jesus as a “white European,” which he claimed “are a form of white supremacy.”

“Yes, I think the statues of the white European they claim is Jesus should also come down,” King, a former surrogate on Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders’s 2020 presidential campaign, wrote on Twitter. “They are a form of white supremacy. Always have been.”

King’s targeting of “religious artwork” comes as various activist groups have moved beyond tearing down “Confederate” statues and are now calling for the removal of other historical monuments.

“In the Bible, when the family of Jesus wanted to hide, and blend in, guess where they went?” he added. “EGYPT! Not Denmark. Tear them down.”

“Yes. All murals and stained glass windows of white Jesus, and his European mother, and their white friends should also come down. They are a gross form white supremacy. Created as tools of oppression. Racist propaganda. They should all come down.” — Shaun King (@shaunking) June 22, 2020

“All murals and stained glass windows of white Jesus, and his European mother, and their white friends should also come down,” King wrote in a second tweet. “They are a gross form of white supremacy.”

These tweets are a desperate bid for “attention” from white Shaun King who rode the Black Lives Matter “train to fame” but now feels it’s passing him by. However, because they did garner a few thousand “likes”, his ignorant and stupid statements deserve to be rebutted.

Black Lives Matter grifter Shaun King declares war on Christian imagery

Tucker Carlson is currently the most watched news commentator in America and for good reason. Unlike most people, Republicans as well as Democrats, Carlson will not let “political correctness, virtue-signaling, or the fear of cancel culture silence him.”

Instead, night after night, Carlson talks about what’s really happening in American cities, without trying to excuse “heinous leftist behavior” or diminish its effects on America’s long-term health.  Moreover, with each commentary, his voice gets stronger. What you heard last week from Carlson was good, but what you’ll hear this week is even better.

So it was that Carlson gave what may have been his best monologue yet on the “violence and destruction” ripping through America.

Although Tucker opens by referring to the “mob attack” on the Andrew Jackson statue in Lafayette Square, he quickly focuses on something that is, in some ways, even worse than mob action, and that’s the way America’s institutions are falling in line with the mob.

New York’s Museum of Natural History has chosen to “remove” the statue of President Teddy Roosevelt astride a horse, which has stood in front of the museum since the 1930s.  It’s apparently offensive because standing at his side are men representing his explorations in Africa and Latin America.

Carlson argues there’s something much deeper going on here. Teddy Roosevelt, he explains, was a quintessentially American president. A human dynamo, he represented American initiative, self-discipline, self-improvement, and innovation. He fought corporate monopolies, which is the last thing today’s fascist left wants to do, as well as standing against racism and anti-Semitism.

There is no reason to “topple” Teddy Roosevelt except for the fact that he is “us.”  And that, says Carlson, is the real issue:

“Teddy Roosevelt was a hero to millions of Americans. He still is. That’s precisely why they are tearing down his statue. They know that if they can force you to watch as they topple your heroes, they have won. There’s nothing they can’t do next.”

After reciting the growing list of statues the left is tearing down, Carlson points out that the new names on the list have something in common: “they’re not linked to the Confederacy, which was the original excuse the left gave for its mob attack on the public square.”

What’s really bad is that not only are Democrats okay with “destruction” but so are Republicans. Indeed, Kevin McCarthy, the top House Republican, has been “on board” with the mob’s relentless attack on American symbols.  He and his milquetoasts in Congress apparently hope that if “they say nothing, this will all go away.”

Elected Republicans, almost all of them, are in no hurry to stop the disorder. They appear to believe what we’re watching is a version of the “Rodney King” riots from 1992. People saw an upsetting video on the internet, they’re angry, and that’s understandable. But they’ll calm down soon, and we can get back to cutting capital gains taxes and sanctioning Bashar al-Assad. That’s their view of it.

“They are wrong. This is not a momentary civil disturbance. This is a serious and highly organized political movement. It is not superficial. It is deep and profound. It has vast ambitions. It is insidious; it will grow. Its goal is to end liberal democracy and challenge Western civilization itself.”

There’s more, and you will be doing yourself a favor if you watch it and then share it.  Carlson’s conclusion is that, “weak as they are” Republicans are the only thing still capable of stopping the complete “breakdown” of the American system, from the Constitution on down to the picture of Lincoln on the five-dollar bill.

In other words, the brilliant Carlson is saying what I, the sometimes barely coherent Andrea, have said for a long time: “in this election, as in no other in our lifetimes, the perfect is most truly the enemy of the good.”

Republicans, sadly, are imperfect.  Even the great Trump, whom I would put up there with Reagan, or even higher, is imperfect.  But no matter how much you dislike them, they’re all we’ve got left.

If we refuse to vote for them in November because they fail to live up to our immaculate standards, we have opened the floodgates and will watch leftism irrevocably sweep away the grand American experiment.

A chilling warning about where the statue-toppling leads
Stop pandering to the left’s systemic racism “big lie”

Unmasking Antifa

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on June 24, 2020 by andelino

At least 100 demonstrators marched through the streets of Portland, Oregon chanting, “Whose streets? Our streets!” and “No KKK. No fascist U.S.A. No Trump.”

Many of these demonstrators wore the “logo” of Antifa, the far-left movement that has been making headlines across Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States.

This demonstration was organized by Refuse Fascism PDX, a joint venture between the Revolutionary Communist Party USA and the Democratic Socialists of America. Its purpose, according to its organizers, was to call for the removal of “the Trump-Pence regime.”

This march was not marred by violence, but “masked” Antifa agitators caused nearly $100,000 worth of damage to the University of California–Berkeley campus last February during a protest against a “speech” by a Breitbart News editor.

During those protests, Antifa members started “fires, broke windows, painted graffiti on nearby businesses, destroyed automatic teller machines and assaulted bystanders.”

Six months later, Antifa “agitators” announced their presence on August 12 by “brawling” with neo-Nazis in Charlottesville, Virginia. Then, they again made headlines for assaulting demonstrators at a “No to Marxism in America” rally on August 27.

As violent protests and demonstrations rise up across the country, many are now asking, “What is Antifa?”

Antifa is actually not a “new” political force. It is a loosely connected network of groups named in “honor” of the military wing of the “Communist Party of Germany.” The movement was founded in the 1920s as part of the Soviet Union’s efforts to transform Germany into a “Communist” dictatorship.

The group’s name is an abbreviation for “anti-fascist,” and its strategy is to label all of its rival parties as “fascist.” During the 1920s and 1930s, Antifa worked to “convince” Germans that mainstream political parties like the “Social Democrats” were no better than the Nazis. This strategy successfully convinced hundreds of thousands of Germans to join the ranks of the “Communist Party.”

The Antifa movement experienced a “resurgence” in the 1980s, when far-left activists in Germany and the United States resurrected the strategy of labeling free-market advocates and constitutional conservatives as “fascists.” In the U.S., Antifa leaders specifically link the “free market to white supremacy.”

Mark Bray, an Antifa sympathizer and author of “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook,” wrote in the Washington Post that Antifa activists “reject turning to the police or the state to halt the advance of white supremacy.” Instead, they advocate “mob” opposition to what they label as “fascism”, and resistance to free-market forces that they say support fascism. Popular Antifa chants include, “Cops and the Klan go hand in hand” and “No Trump. No wall. No U.S.A. at all.” That’s right: No U.S.A. at all.

By creating an environment where people lose “faith” in government institutions, Antifa hopes to “swell” its ranks, and the ranks of groups like Democratic Socialists of America. While it is difficult to pin down exact numbers on Antifa groups in the United States, an NPR/PBS poll from August shows that up to “5 percent” of the American public are sympathetic to Antifa’s cause. By polarizing the political scene into “fascist and anti-fascist” camps, Antifa is eroding the democratic center, like it did in 1920s Germany.

A dangerous trend toward “lawlessness” is taking root in America. Together with major media outlets and allied groups like “Black Lives Matter”, Antifa is promoting a narrative that America’s system of “constitutional checks and balances” is only a mask for “wealthy, white men” to dominate. They say this system must be torn down.

There is a dark spiritual force behind the unrest. “Republicans and Democrats are divided like never before.” Rather than trying to solve the nation’s problems, the “radical left” is stirring them up. Some people believe they are bringing “down” President Donald Trump, but are they instead bringing down America itself?

The Bible prophesies this about America’s near future: Your country is desolate, your cities burned with fire; your fields are being stripped by foreigners right before you, laid waste as when overthrown by strangers.” (Isaiah 1:7).

Why would God allow such “devastation?” Because Americans have “rebelled” against His law.

In Ezekiel 5, God reveals that there will be a time of violent “rioting” in the cities of America just before they “suffer” a foreign invasion. The dangerous level of “ideological” division in modern day America is leading to the ultimate fulfillment of this prophecy.

The extent to which Antifa will specifically contribute to the “unfolding” of this nightmarish scenario remains to be seen. But its openly “subversive” aims and its revolution oriented “violence” are beginning to gather dangerous “momentum” in American society.

Expect it to grow far worse.

Colleges Going Left

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on May 22, 2019 by andelino

American education “represents” America’s future. And what is happening on university campuses is a shocking shift toward “radicalism” that threatens to dismantle civilization.

American colleges and universities are about to hold “commencement” exercises for some 4.8 million students. These graduates will be further to the “political left” than their parents. Pew Research data indicates that, increasingly, the more college someone has, the further “left their thinking” becomes. And a growing number of students are embracing “radical” leftist views.

These institutions have become “incubators” for leftism, in some shockingly “toxic” forms. Curricula are becoming “politicized and radicalized.” Administrators and professors are pushing “extremist and bizarre” ideas. They fixate on “race, sex and class” in noxious ways, often in response to demands from “activist” students.

This trend is nothing to “shrug” your shoulders over. The more that schools and society “permit and encourage” this trend, the more “damage” it will cause. Leftist education is nothing less than a “threat” to Western civilization.

Today’s leaders—“its politicians, chief executives, journalists, commentators and other pacesetters”—are yesterday’s university students. To see what the United States is “about to become”, just look at what our universities are “teaching” today’s students.

Professors have been “politically left” of the average American for decades, but in recent years, the gap between the two has “dramatically“ widened. In the late 1960’s, about 43 percent of U.S. college professors self-identified as “left of center.” Around 2001, that number began to shoot up, increasing to 60 percent by 2016. Between 2001 and 2010, those identifying as “far left” more than doubled, according the American Institute for Economic Research.

Meanwhile, faculty considering themselves “right of center” fell from 28 percent in the late 1960’s to 22 percent in 1995 to 12 percent today. The institute attributed this shift to retirements and “an emerging bias in faculty hiring.” Today, America’s self-proclaimed “far left” professors roughly equal the total number “right of center.”

Higher education “is skewed heavily toward a single ‘consensus’ ideology,” the institute wrote. This is particularly true in certain fields of study. “Professors in the humanities and social sciences skew much further to the left than the physical sciences,” the institute wrote. “Over 80 percent of English professors, for example, identify on the political left. Subjects such as history, political science, sociology, and fine arts typically approach or exceed 70 percent.” It happens that these college departments are growing, with faculty hiring’s in the humanities outpacing those in science and engineering.

Students attending leftist-dominated universities are emerging as converted “radicals, leftists, socialists and Marxists.” And predictably, leftist “ideology” is spreading into high schools and even grade schools. Based on political “campaign” contributions, teachers constitute one of the most liberal professions in the nation.

The University of Michigan has nearly 100 “diversity administrators,” a quarter of whom earn six-figure salaries. An economics professor at the school recently calculated that they cost the university around $14 million annually, Forbes reported. Such administrative bloat is common: “It has actually become normal in universities to have more administrators than full-time faculty.”

What do all these “diversity” professionals do? They search for “injustice.” They snoop out “racism and bigotry.” And they find it—“in society, in history, in their schools’ curricula” — on their own campuses. Everywhere they look, they find evidence of “inequity” that demonstrates how important their “own” jobs are.

So these students learn that they can “blame” their academic failures on “institutional racism.” In literature classes, they skip Chaucer and Shakespeare in favor of “women, people of color and queer” authors. In history, they learn how America’s founders were “slave-owners and rapists.” Encouraged by well-paid “diversity” administrators, they are overturning ”tradition”, speaking out and demanding “change.”

At Hofstra University, students have “defaced” a statue of Thomas Jefferson with “decolonize” and “Black Lives Matter” signs and stickers. The statue represents “a legacy of racism and bigotry on college campuses,” according to the student president of Hofstra College Democrats. The student group “Jefferson Has Gotta Go” is also demanding “an online, bias reporting system, an online complaint receipt program, and mandated, comprehensive, cultural competency training.”

Such stories are routine. Radicalized students are “attacking” American history. They are “vandalizing” statues. They are using “threats” to silence free speech. They are “demanding” resignations. They are marching and demonstrating with “violent rhetoric actions.”

The American Institute for Economic Research article stated: Multiple surveys suggest that students outside of the progressive left self-censor their beliefs on campus, fearing both viewpoint discrimination and bias from faculty in grading. Recent empirical studies of faculty in psychology and law also reveal evidence of actual discrimination against viewpoints that fall outside of the progressive umbrella, particularly in academic hiring.”

Claiming to “fight” for tolerance and freedom, leftism uses “intimidation, bullying and mob rule” in an attempt to gain power. And with that power, it uses “coercion, authoritarianism and tyranny.”

A vivid example of just how far “awry” this trend can go occurred recently at “The Evergreen State College”, a public liberal arts school in Washington State that is one of the most “leftist” colleges in the country.

Filmmaker Mike Nayna told this story in a recent documentary. A few years ago, Evergreen’s president George Bridges began a program to “advance diversity” on campus. He told the college faculty, “I established and charged this equity council—this incredible equity council—with developing a plan for institutional change, systemic change, that would enable Evergreen to acknowledge and address the equity gaps that are pervasive on our campus.”

The “equity council” wanted control over hiring’s, over which individuals could be hired to which positions—and which positions existed in the first place.

In one of the council’s first staff meetings, one instructor said, “It will take many hands to do this, to unscrew the structure of institutional racism.” Another organizer had attendees come to the front of the room and form what he called a “canoe,” a visual demonstration of getting everyone on board with their plan for campus social justice. He organized them in rows as if in an enormous canoe. College administrators joined the group, but the organizer told them to step back out, saying, “You have to ask for permission and commit some things before boarding the canoe.”

What followed was a series of self-punishing apologies and pledges from white-skinned faculty members: “I would like to board the canoe because I’m committed to enhancing and furthering inclusion and equity on our campus …” and so forth. One female student emotionally stated, “I am here because I refuse to continue to be assimilated. I refuse! And I refuse to let whiteness consume me. And I’m going to say that word explicitly: whiteness!”

Such obsequiousness and self-loathing is exactly what “cultural competency training” is meant to produce.

This documentary features excerpts of a lecture to Evergreen faculty given by Robin DiAngelo, whose academic title is “Scholar of Whiteness Studies.” Here is how this white woman defined racism: “Structural, institutionalized inequality—or racism. An anti-racist frame understands racism as a system. While individual players partake in it, it’s not dependent on individual players. It’s embedded in the fabric of the society, in all the institutions, the norms, the practices, the policies, the way that history’s told. And it functions to ensure an unequal distribution of basically everything between people of color as a whole and white people as a whole.”

By that extraordinary definition of “racism,” no white person can escape. If you are white, you are guilty. If you think you are not, here is what DiAngelo has to say to you about that notion: “I can’t emphasize this enough: This is not useful. Just get rid of it. It is not possible to avoid being socialized into a racist worldview if you’re white. It’s not possible. It’s coming at us 24/7. The only way to resist it is to be able to see it and think it through. So to deny it is not going to help you.”

Evergreen’s “equity council” sponsored lectures and activities to educate students and faculty on how to “detect” all the racism at the college. And they found lots of “racism.” The harder they looked, the more they found. In fact, they managed to conclude that “The Evergreen State College” was actually a bastion of “white supremacy.” They found that this college—one of the most leftist colleges of all the leftist colleges in this country—was systematically destroying “people of color.”

Biology professor at the college, Bret Weinstein, was alarmed by these developments. “There were all these allegations about white supremacy at Evergreen. And every so often, somebody—sometimes it was me, sometimes it was somebody else—asked, OK: Where is this white supremacy? Can we see it? Can we evaluate it?” He raised the question at one staff meeting, and here is how, in his words, a black faculty member responded: “To ask students who are suffering from white supremacy to tell us about instances of white supremacy is itself racism. And she said we must stop asking them, because we are inflicting harm on them asking for evidence. And the phrase she used—she said, To ask for evidence of racism is racism with a capital R.”

The message the students received was clear. What, then, were they to do? Once their eyes had been “opened” to all the white supremacy and institutional injustice against “black and brown bodies” at the college, were they not obligated to stand up for themselves? Using whatever means necessary?

In March 2017, racial minorities at Evergreen made a shocking request. They wanted a day in which, in the words of the student newspaper, the Cooper Point Journal, “all white faculty and students remain absent from campus, leaving the space free for community members of color.”

Professor Weinstein e-mailed the faculty director of “First Peoples Multicultural Advising Services” calling this demand “an act of oppression.” He refused to leave campus for being white. Word of his “dissent and obstructionism” got out. Soon after, a mob of about 50 angry students besieged Weinstein and shouted “obscenities” at him every time he tried to explain himself.

Someone called the police, but the students “blocked” officers from entering the building. When police found another way in, the students left and went after the college president. Weinstein ended up having to hold his class “off campus” because police couldn’t guarantee his safety.

President Bridges agreed to a meeting with the protesters later that day. Video emerged online of that “raucous, profanity-laced” meeting. The students behaved like barbarian children, “pitching fits, exhibiting unbridled emotion, anger and hatred.” Anytime one of the administrators or faculty tried to respond, the students shouted them down and screamed at them.

After the meeting, a coalition of black students issued a set of demands. Among them was a demand that the video of the event be taken down. They said it had been “stolen by white supremacists and edited to expose and ridicule the students and staff.” Other demands included the disarmament of campus police; the firing or suspension without pay of Weinstein and other faculty members; “mandatory sensitivity and cultural competency training for faculty, staff, administrators and student employees”; the permanent hiring of a “Trans & Queer Center” coordinator; and “the creation of a permanent position that will support undocumented students.”

President Bridges treated these students’ “deranged demands” as if they were reasonable and fair. He “meekly” agreed to some of them. Over the negotiating table he proffered something of a half-hearted “defense” of free speech, but when one of the students pushed back, he said this: “They’re going to say some things that we don’t like, and our job is to bring them all in—or get them out. What I hear us stating that we are working toward is, bring ‘em in, train ‘em, and if they don’t get it, sanction ‘em.”

He was describing political “re-education” and if that failed, “punishment.” This is authoritarianism, pure and simple.

The Evergreen students took “control” of the college. At one point they were stopping cars “entering and leaving campus,” apparently looking for Weinstein. When he rode his “bike” to campus to teach that day, he was told he wasn’t safe “on or off” campus, and that he should at least go home and get in his “car” which would offer some protection in case the “mob” caught up to him.

Why did these students want to commit “violence” against Weinstein? His “crime” was simply to disagree with their “coercive” methods. Yet in their minds, this mild-mannered, politically liberal college professor came to embody the “racism” they had become convinced was endangering their lives. This is absolutely “unhinged” thinking. In the thrall of “radical racial justice illogic,” The Evergreen State College rapidly transformed into an “asylum run by the inmates.”

It is chilling to see students, “radicalized and angry, en masse, violently forcing their ill-informed, preposterous views” on college authorities. It is chilling to see faculty responding by “apologizing and kowtowing, giving in and appeasing” this unruly mob. It is chilling to see administrators, in an craven effort to prove their leftist credentials, “using their power to coerce and force nonbelievers into compliance.”

But in a way, this scenario is playing out “society-wide” as leftists bully their way into the mainstream, accuse anyone who opposes them of “bigotry”, and increasingly gain the support of the “media, the courts and the politicians” to enforce their views.

Look closely at what is happening on our college campuses. This “rot” has been fermenting for years, and now it is getting “more emotional, more animated and more violent” by the spirit of the mob. It shows the extremes to which the intolerance of the “radical” left is going. This toxic behavior is seeping beyond the “safe spaces” of these campuses.

“It is affecting high schools, middle schools and even grade schools. It is transforming American workplaces. It is making its way into courtrooms. It is spreading into our politics. It vividly shows how these policies proposed to solve the nation’s problems actually end up creating crises that are many times worse.”

A movement like this can never be satisfied. Appeasing it only fuels it. Fulfill one of the left’s demands, and they return with five more in its place. The pillars of American society are under determined attack, and they are crumbling.

In his documentary, Professor Weinstein concluded: “I keep being invited to talk about free speech on college campuses, and every time I’m invited I make the same point: This isn’t about free speech, and this is only tangentially about college campuses. This is about a breakdown in the basic logic of civilization, and it’s spreading. College campuses may be the first dramatic battle, but of course, this is going to find its way to the courts. It’s already found its way into the tech sector. It’s going to find its way to the highest levels of governance if we’re not careful. And it actually does jeopardize the ability of civilization to continue to function.”

Useful Stooges

White Left

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on January 28, 2019 by andelino

If you’re Chinese and living in a western democracy, chances are you have heard the term “Baizuo.” Literally translated for English speakers, it means “white-left.”

This term has spread like “wildfire” in the Chinese community.

According to OpenDemocracy.net, “Baizuo” refers to those who:

“…only care about topics such as immigration, minorities, LGBT and the environment and have no sense of real problems in the real world; they are hypocritical humanitarians who advocate for peace and equality only to satisfy their own feeling of moral superiority.”

I heard the term first when I was at a “Yellow Vest” protest in Calgary.

There was a group of angry SJW’s yelling at the Yellow Vests, as you’d expect, calling them “xenophobic” and “hateful”, and telling them that they should embrace “diversity.”

Of course, these white cultural “Marxists” were camera shy, but they kept shouting at the Yellow Vester’s that they needed to put a stop their “racism.”

I couldn’t believe the irony myself when a Chinese Canadian walked up to me, laughing at the “baizuo” over there. She asked me if I knew what “baizuo” means. I didn’t at the time.

The fact that a Chinese woman thinks this just blows the minds of leftists. Their NPC brains don’t come pre-programmed with speech strings to respond to a non-white conservative.

Can you imagine the left being so entrenched in the identity-politics narrative that they just knee-jerk react and call these ethnically Chinese ladies white supremacists?

They actually unironically did:

“Racist and white supremacist ideas have become more visible among the Chinese Canadian right.” https://t.co/Xr4A55CPDF — VICE Canada (@vicecanada) September 18, 2018

Remember when Vice Canada tweeted this? They said the Chinese are becoming more and more involved in the white supremacist movement? What is going through the head of the liberal writing this?

It’s becoming more and more clear that the left is confusing “white supremacy” with the rejection of “socialism, communism, and radical Islam.”

The left is losing their grip on a minority group that has historically made up a huge block of their voting constituency.

You and I both know, when the left is losing, they “don’t take it well.”

In Canada, Justin Trudeau has all but ignored the thirteen Canadians who are incarcerated in China, and has not moved a diplomat, let alone heaven and earth, to repatriate a Canadian given the death sentence in a kangaroo-court retrial.

I can only imagine what Donald Trump would do.

Chinese Americans, and Chinese Canadians, are looking at Trudeau’s response to a communist dictatorship, and then they look at how Donald Trump treats the communist country in contrast.

They look at how Trudeau’s “illegal” immigration program is literally “killing” young women in their community; they will never forget Marrisa Shen, the young girl killed by an illegal Trudeau “refugee.”

It’s only a matter of time before the Chinese community drops left-wing parties in western democracies entirely.

The curious rise of the ‘white left’ as a Chinese internet insult
Cyber-feminism in China: between expression and oppression
 

White Privilege Conference

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , on April 17, 2014 by andelino

White Privilege Conference 00The “White Privilege Conference” (WPC) aims to create a “learning” community in which participants “engage” in a challenging educational experience as “respectful” community members.

The views expressed by “facilitators and speakers” at the conference do not necessarily “reflect” the views of the WPC and conference organizers.

Each participant is in a “different” place with regard to their journey in understanding “white supremacy, whiteness, privilege, power and oppression.”

Thus, we ask that each participant share “responsibility” for holding themselves “accountable” to this community agreement that will allow for a “shared” experience that fosters the opportunity for “understanding, respecting and connecting.”

General Information, WPC Glossary Key Terms, Conference Schedule and Topics can be found at the pdf. link “White Privilege Conference”. Please note: Gender “neutral” restrooms are available that are not labeled “men” and “women” and are provided for those conference participants that opt out of a “gender binary system.”

The 15th “White Privilege Conference” just concluded in Madison, Wisconsin teaching educators “white people can’t be cured of racism”:

What Can Educators do to End White Supremacy in the Classroom?

White Privilege Conference 02The best you can “hope” for is the following quote from facilitator Kim Radersma, a “white” former high school English teacher:

“Being a white person who does anti-racist work is like being an alcoholic. I will never be recovered by my alcoholism, to use the metaphor,” Radersma said.

“I have to everyday wake up and acknowledge that I am so deeply imbedded with racist thoughts and notions and actions in my body that I have to choose everyday to do anti-racist work and think in an anti-racist way.”

She continued that “until” white people admit they “have a problem,” they will not be “able” to fight against “white” privilege.

“We’ve been raised to be good. ‘I’m a good white person,’ and yet to realize I carry within me these dark, horrible thoughts and perceptions is hard to admit. And yet like the alcoholic, what’s the first step? Admitting you have a problem,” she told the session attendees.

Let me put this in plain English.

Kim Radersma, a white woman who admits having “dark, horrible thoughts and perceptions”, claims all whites are “racist” and therefore unable to “effectively” teach non-whites. If she really believes this, then why doesn’t she see that her “theory” itself, by definition, is “ultimate racist” in nature?

Radersma is a strong proponent of political “ideology” being infused into education as well. Later in her speech she explained that “If you don’t want to work for equity, get the fuck out of education.”

“If you are not serious about being an agent of change that helps stifle the oppressive systems, go find another job. Because you are a political figure.”

The Longer You are in the Tea Party, the More Racist You Become

White Privilege Conference 04“Not only are all members of the Tea Party movement racists, but the longer a person associates with the Tea Party, the more racist he becomes” according to Leonard Zeskind, an author and activist, hosting a session on the “racist roots” of the Teat Party.

In Zeskind’s view, the oppression of minorities is a central motivating principal of the Tea Party. “There has been a longitudinal study that finds the longer you are in the Tea Party, the more racist you become.”

Tea Party groups are similar to “white nationalist” groups, he said. “Is it racist?” he asked. He then answered his own question: “Yes.”

Zeskind denounced other “racists” as well. People who send their kids to “private schools” are also racists. People who “disagree” with President Obama are also racists.

White Privilege Conference 01Not to be outdone by the other speakers, Niger Innis, national spokesman for the Congress of Racial Equality, “denounced” the White Privilege Conference, calling it “The White Money Conference” for being “frivolous, irrelevant and a waste of taxpayer money.”

Not to mention the convention does nothing to address the real “needs and concerns” of struggling “minorities,” Innis told Wisconsin Reporter.

Innis doesn’t have a problem with the conference’s “progressive” organizers inviting thousands of teachers, university faculty, activists, government employees and students to discuss the “evils of Western Civilization and white people” so long as they are prepared to “pay for it” themselves.

Let’s face it, to be an authentically “black” person you must live up to and demonstrate all the “stereotypes” that blacks complain about.

For example, let’s look at Barack Hussein Obama who is such an “Agent of Change.”

Stupid? yes. Lazy? yes. Corrupt? yes. A Liar? yes. Blames others for his own screw-ups? yes. Shirks personal responsibility? yes. Sense of entitlement? Yes. Pack of Kool Menthols? yes. Basketball? yes. Golf? Yes. Questionable education? yes.

Ebony 02

He is the “all time” black Master at “ferreting” out all the “racist” white men in America.

I would think that people around the world could “learn” much from this, but as they taught at the conference, it is “hopeless if you are white!”

%d bloggers like this: