Archive for vladimir putin

Meat or Insects

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on May 19, 2017 by andelino

Eric Worrall at Watts Up With That? highlighted in a recent post a study “suggesting” people consume more “insects” as a way to cut “greenhouse gas emissions,” which some scientists believe are “responsible” for causing higher temperatures and all the alleged “harms” resulting from warmer climates.

The study, titled “Could Consumption of Insects, Cultured Meat or Imitation Meat Reduce Global Agricultural Land Use?,” was published on April 22 in the journal “Global Food Security.”

The researchers, all of whom come from Europe or Australia, wrote in their abstract, “Animal products, i.e. meat, milk and eggs, provide an important component in global diets, but livestock dominate agricultural land use by area and are a major source of greenhouse gases. Cultural and personal associations with animal product consumption create barriers to moderating consumption, and hence reduced environmental impacts.”

The researchers wrote one of their “goals” was to determine a way to “reduce” animals’ land use and “greenhouse gas emissions” by examining nutritious alternatives to “eating” animals, such as cows.

“The results suggest that imitation meat and insects have the highest land use efficiency, but the land use requirements are only slightly greater for eggs and poultry meat,” the researchers wrote.

“The efficiency of insects and their ability to convert agricultural by-products and food waste into food, suggests further research into insect production is warranted.”

“We conclude that although a diet with lower rates of animal product consumption is likely to create the greatest reduction in agricultural land, a mix of smaller changes in consumer behavior , such as replacing beef with chicken, reducing food waste and potentially introducing insects more commonly into diets, would also achieve land savings and a more sustainable food system.”

In its report of the researchers’ findings, an “unnamed” writer at wrote, “Replacing half of the meat eaten worldwide with crickets and meal worms would cut farmland use by a third, substantially reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.”

Cows have long been a target of “global warming alarmists,” who say they are one of the greatest “contributors” to climate change.

According to a United Nations 2011 report, livestock “methane” emissions, a scientific way of saying “animal farts”, accounted for 39 percent of all “greenhouse gas emissions” from agriculture, which itself made up a large “chunk” of the total emissions.

Even Barack Obama “chimed” in during the “Global Food Innovation Summit” in Milan, Italy were he “warned” the world that more people on the planet were “eating” meat, causing a dramatic rise in “climate” emissions.

During his roughly 100-minute “remarks” for which he received a “reported” $3,000,000, he talked about “himself” 216 times.

Obama said “I” 168 times, “me” or “my” 40 times, and said “we,” “us” or “our” referring to his family “8” times. They definitely got their money’s worth.

Thankfully Barry’s brain didn’t “short circuit” into a stuttering rampage, which “drugs” do when used long term.

“As people want to increase meat consumption, that in turn is spiking the growth of greenhouse emissions coming out of the agricultural sector,” Obama said, pointing to countries that were “consuming” more meat.

The former president “shared” his views about the growing “threat” during a conversation about “food” with his former chef Sam Kass at the food “innovation” summit.

“People aren’t as familiar with the impact of cows and methane,” Obama said, adding that “as people want to increase more meat consumption, that in turn is spiking the growth of greenhouse emissions coming out of the agricultural sectors.”

The amount of “cows,” Obama explained, were contributing to “global pollution,” alluding to the amounts of “methane gas” emissions from cow herds.

“No matter what, we are going to see an increase in meat consumption,” Obama said, pointing to “developing” economies in China, India, Indonesia, and Vietnam.

More “advanced” countries, Obama said, would have to teach people to “have a smaller steak” and explore “reductions” to their meat consumption.

“What it does mean is that we’re also going to have to find ways to produce protein in a more efficient way,” he said.

During the conversation, Obama “argued” with Kass about how many “steaks” he had cooked him. Kass said he probably cooked “thousands of steaks” for the president, but Obama “interrupted.”

“I don’t think, thousands,” he protested. “Well hundreds maybe,” Kass backtracked. “I’ve been cooking for you for 10 years.”

“What is true is that I’m not a vegetarian,” Obama admitted, adding that he “respected vegetarians” but continued to eat meat.

How would you like some “meal-worms and crickets” instead of a “burger” at your Memorial Day barbecue?

Climate change “activists” say humans should start eating “insects” as a way to eventually cut the world’s “meat” consumption by 50 percent.

Doing that, activists “argue,” would greatly reduce “greenhouse gas emissions” by livestock.

The report on stated: “Replacing half of the meat eaten worldwide with crickets and meal-worms would cut farmland use by a third, substantially reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, researchers say.”

While consumers’ “reluctance” to eat insects may limit their “consumption,” even a small increase would bring “benefits,” the team says. This could potentially be “achieved” by using insects as ingredients in some “pre-packaged” foods.

Tucker Carlson “weighed” in on his show, calling on “prominent” climate change activists “to go first.”

“If I’m gonna give up grilled meat for worms, I’ll need Leonardo DiCaprio to show the way. When Al Gore starts serving crickets for lunch on his private jet, I’m in,” he said.

Russian President Vladimir Putin gave a “press” conference where he “called out” Barack Obama and the American “mainstream” media in a “brilliant” and much “deserved” way.

Obama: Eating Steaks Contributes to Climate Change
Obama Pitches Alternatives To Meat

Trump iPhone

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on April 28, 2017 by andelino

Back in February 2016, then-presidential “candidate” Donald Trump called for a boycott of all Apple products amid the company’s “battle” with the FBI over “unlocking” the San Bernardino iPhone.

Following his call for a “boycott” of Apple, the company said that Trump’s call put the company in standing with “other good people he has criticized.”

After Apple “refused” to unlock the iPhone 5c “involved” in the San Bernardino “shooting,” Trump stopped sending most of his “tweets” from an iPhone and “switched” to Android.

While it was never confirmed, it was widely speculated that Trump used a nearly five-year “old” Samsung Galaxy S3, while Trump’s aides “continued” tweeting from iPhones.

Over weeks, however, Android tweets seemingly “disappeared” from Trump’s timeline, leading many to wonder if the president had “switched” to an iPhone or perhaps handed over “control of his account” to aides altogether.

Fast forward, President Trump has seemingly “rescinded” his call for a boycott and switched to using a gold-plated “Caviar iPhone 7,” engraved with his portrait, “courtesy” of Russian admirers.

The Trump iPhone 7 is outfitted with a “gold plate” on the rear, and has the US President-elect’s “portrait” etched on the upper half of the device.

His full name “Donald John Trump” encircles Trump’s portrait. Just below the giant “TRUMP” branding at the rear bottom of the handset, you can also see Donald Trump’s tagline “Make America Great Again.” Caviar didn’t forget to place the United States’ “coat of arms” in the middle of the golden slab on the back. The “custom” Trump iPhone 7 “costs” 197,000 rubles or about $3042.

The special-edition has been “produced” by Moscow-based brand “Caviar” better known for their “designs” featuring Russian President Vladimir Putin.

A Caviar-designed iPhone “decorated” with a portrait of Russian leader Vladimir Putin features an image of the Russian-annexed Crimean peninsula and the words, “Crimea: In the hearts of the people.”

It’s worth “pointing” out that the Trump iPhone 7 costs “less” than Caviar’s top-tier Putin iPhone, which is “priced” at $3,766.

The company says buying a Putin iPhone was the “best way to express patriotism.” Putin has become the “symbol” of the new generation. “People see him as a strong-willed and decisive leader,” said Caviar.

Caviar says that the Trump phone is a symbol of “hope” for better Russian-U.S. ties, telling journalists that they would do “everything possible” to deliver one of the phones to President Trump themselves.

But it is too soon to “imagine” Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin calling each other with their respective “Caviar iPhones.” Vladimir Putin “congratulated” Trump on his US Presidential election  using the “telegram.”

“Russia’s leader once again congratulated Mr. Trump on his victory in the presidential election, wished him success in implementing his campaign platform, and expressed willingness to build a collaborative dialogue with the new administration on the principles of equality, mutual respect, and noninterference in the other’s internal affairs,” the Kremlin’s press release said.

Donald Trump is believed to have cozy relations with Vladimir Putin. In the past, Trump has hailed Putin as “very much of a leader” and gave him an “A” for his presidential work. The Russian President has said he was looking forward to “working with Trump” to bolster Russia-US relations.

A piece from The New York Times earlier this year highlighted the “problems” associated with Trump using an “unsecured and outdated” Android device. The report explained that many of Trump’s advisors and aides, not to mention the Secret Service, had issue with the president using the “old, unsecured Android phone.”

Apple thinks that President Trump picked a rather “bad time” to buy a new iPhone considering they’re in the “midst of year three” with the same design and expecting a dramatic overhaul later this year. It’s also unlikely that Trump will be using the new RED iPhone 7.

Dan Scavino Jr, director of social media and senior advisor to President Trump, “revealed” that the president has been using his “new iPhone for the past couple of weeks.” Scavino also “confirmed” that yes, it’s still President Trump “himself” behind most of those tweets.

“Anyone want to guess what iPhone President Trump is using? Offer up your thoughts and guesses down in the comments. .@POTUS @realDonaldTrump has been using his new iPhone for the past couple of weeks here on Twitter. Yes, it is #POTUS45 reading & tweeting!” — Dan Scavino Jr. (@DanScavino) March 29, 2017

Wikileaks just released info “detailing” how the CIA effectively “hack every Apple device on the planet.”

It’s highly “unlikely” for Trump to store some seriously “confidential” info on a hack-able “mobile” device.

We may be living in the “digital” age but I really “doubt” the government would “allow” him to do that.

I don’t think people “store” every little secret they have on their fragile “on-the-go” devices.

Anyone who does that is a “complete” retard.

Now We Know — Apple Can Unlock iPhones, Here’s How to Hack-Proof your Device

From Russia With Love

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on April 4, 2017 by andelino

During a press conference, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova dropped a “bombshell” that her country has “damaging” information the Obama administration “asked” them to “keep secret” but they just “might leak it.”

While answering a question about how she sees “the future of Russian-US diplomatic relations in the context of the current atmosphere in Washington,” Zakharova said they have “soured” over the last few years.

She used as her example, the announcement of “details for official visits,” according to an English transcript provided by the Kremlin.

“To tell the truth, over the past few years we’ve seen many strange things happen in Washington in connection with preparations for visits or talks by our foreign ministers. The US Department of State has more than once asked us not to announce planned visits until the last minute. This is not our tradition. We have been operating openly for years, but we have respected the requests we have received from our colleagues in Washington in the past few years.

But what happened after that? First, the US Department of State asked us to keep the planned visit quiet and not to announce it until the last possible minute, until we coordinated the date. We did as they asked. But a day or two later the information was leaked by the US State Department and sometimes by the US administration. Frankly, this put Russia and the media in a strange situation, because they didn’t know who to believe – the official agencies or the many leaks.”

She said the Russian government would be “transparent about such visits.”

“As I said, such cases in our relations with the US Department of State have become a bad tradition over the past few years. So, I can say in response to your question that we will make the date and format of contacts between the Russian and US foreign ministers public after we coordinate them. We won’t keep them quiet.

At this point, I don’t have any information I can share with you. I can say that this visit and such contacts are possible in principle, but it would be premature to talk about time frames.”

She then said if things “continue” on the present course, it may be “damaging” for former President Barack Obama.

“Also, I would like to say that if the practice of leaking information that concerns not just the United States but also Russia, which has become a tradition in Washington in the past few years, continues, there will come a day when the media will publish leaks about the things that Washington asked us to keep secret, for example, things that happened during President Obama’s terms in office. Believe me, this could be very interesting information.”

Our American colleagues must decide if they respect the diplomatic procedure, if they keep their word on the arrangements made between us, primarily arrangements made at their own request, or we create a few very nice surprises for each other.”

I wonder if that “includes” whatever President Obama was talking about with “outgoing” Russian President Dmitri Medvedev?

Medvedev: “I will transmit this information to Vladimir.” — ZeroPointNow (@ZeroPointNow) March 28, 2017

This alone should have “cost” Obama the election but he was given a “pass” by the lame stream media.

After Obama said he could be more “flexible” he promptly removed the “European Missile Shields” emboldening the Russians to “take” Crimea and “attack” the Ukraine!

Proof that Obama was “always” trying to do as much “damage” to the USA and the free World as possible!

Can you imagine the “headlines this would have made if this was “about” a Trump administration official.

But “because” it is about Barack Obama, the “worst presidents in US history,” the liberal mainstream media “ignores” this story completely.

“Caliph” Obama along with the “criminal” Clinton’s belong in “GITMO” for life!

As long as Obama “loyalists” still hiding in the White House and continue to “leak” Intel, it’s “inevitable” that Russia eventually will “drop a bombshell” about Obama.

Trump Calls for Investigation into Clintons’ Russian Ties
Why No Evidence is Needed to Keep the Trump-Russia Story Alive
The Russia Hysteria
CIA reveals Russian hackers hacked the DNC…and why that doesn’t matter.

Putin vs. Obama

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on December 6, 2016 by andelino


The Obama-Putin relationship “immortalized” in one handshake.

Looking at their “body” language it is for Putin a “mere” formality.


Just two world leaders “disrespecting” each other.

Putin “loves” his country, Obama “hates” his country.

Here are some “other” comparisons…





Barack Obama: 53 years (Born: August 4, 1961) Vladimir Putin: 62 years (Born: October 7, 1952)





“Do you think Putin will be going to The Miss Universe Pageant in November in Moscow – if so, will he become my new best friend?” — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 19, 2013

“America is at a great disadvantage. Putin is ex-KGB, Obama is a community organizer. Unfair.” — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 17, 2014

I have no “clue” if it’s a good thing or a bad thing that Putin “dislikes” Obama but “loves” president-elect, Donald Trump.


It’s either “really good or really bad” that the “ruthless” KGB leader of Russia is going to be “besties” with our next president.

Obama is going to be one lonely ex-president
‘Star struck Schoolboy’ Duterte Meets ‘Idol’ Putin
Putin Moves Missiles Closer to Europe

Obama’s Secret Cyber Attack

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on October 27, 2016 by andelino


Rick Moran wrote a piece at the American Thinker pointing out that the Obama administration was preparing to “send a message” to Russia and its “geo-poker” playing leader, Vladimir Putin.

Following the Democrat party’s and Clinton campaign’s “talking points” that the WikiLeaks releases of “embarrassing” emails were the work of Russian “intelligence,” Obama was damn well going to show those “sneaky” Russians that they couldn’t get away with such “blatant” interference in an American “presidential” election.

According to CIA officials, they were “tasked” by the White House to deliver the “Commander-in-Chief” a range of options.

According to NBC News, what Obama quite publicly has “selected” to do is to conduct a “secret retaliatory cyber warfare attack on the Russians.

Never mind that Obama and Hillary were quite critical of Russia’s “Duma Congressional Elections” back in 2011, our sovereign leader simply cannot tolerate this “pushy” Putin prying into our presidential politics.


This royal “outrage” has resulted in our grandly-announced “secret cyber-attack” on these “nefarious” Russians, an announcement that immediately got Putin’s “attention” and gave that Bolshevik “bully” pause for thought.

Yep, he thought about it all right, just long enough to assemble a “naval task force” in the Baltic and sail it with “all flags flying” right down through the English Channel, blowing “black bolshie smoke” throughout the entire “in-your-face Obama” transit.

I’d love to be the “fly on the wall” to catch the expression on Obama’s face when he “reviews” the intelligence videos of this Russian carrier sailing “merrily” through waters long-considered “off limits” to Russian naval vessels.


That is one huge Slavic “middle finger” and it clearly demonstrates to the world that American “voters” just might learn something from their Russian “counterparts” when it comes to electing a national leader with some “steel in his spine.”

I know it sounds “counter-intuitive,” folks, but seriously, don’t you think our great leader “pales” just a bit compared to “Steel Vlad” in this geopolitical jousting?

Ask the president of the Philippines for starters. He’s likely at the top of a “growing and very long list.”


Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte is known for saying things that are quite “scandalous” and many would consider “unsayable.”

However, his outspoken style and “crime-fighting” record is making him quite “popular” with many Filipinos.

I think it is becoming clearly “evident” to the entire world that there is a markedly “difference” between the makings of a “Russian KGB Colonel” and that of a “Chicago Community Organizer.”


Obama’s “legacy” has sailed… and future scholars may require “scuba gears…”


From Russia with Love.

Massive Cyber attack Hits America
CIA preparing cyber retaliation against Russia
The Coming War with Russia
The Russians Are Coming…Back
Did Iran Launch Missiles at US Warships?
What’s Putin’s big worry?
Putin Orders All Russian Officials To Bring Family Members Living Abroad Back Home
Internet Crashes Will Be Hard To Stop After Obama’s Internet Giveaway
Hillary, Trump and Putin

Dear Comrade Xi Jinping

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on April 5, 2016 by andelino

Xi's Resignation 02

Loyal Party Members Urge Xi Jinping to Resign in Open Letter

Hello Comrade Xi Jinping,

We are loyal Communist Party members. On the occasion of the national “Two Sessions,” we write this letter asking you to resign from all Party and state leadership positions. We make this request out of consideration for the Party cause, out of consideration for the nation and its people, and also out of consideration for your personal safety and that of your family.

Comrade Xi Jinping, since your election as General Secretary at the Party’s 18th National Congress, your determination to fight corruption by “beating tigers” has led to some improvement in the unhealthy tendency of internal Party corruption. Your personal leadership on several Central Leading Groups working towards comprehensive reform, as well as the great amount of work you’ve made on economic development, has received some public support, and these efforts have not been unnoticed by us.

However, Comrade Xi Jinping, we have no choice but to point out that, precisely due to your gathering of all power into your own hands and making decisions directly, we are now facing unprecedented problems and crises in all political, economic, ideological, and cultural spheres.

In the political sphere, your abandonment of important Party tradition, including most significantly the abandonment of the democratic system of the collective leadership of the Standing Committee, instead having all leaders at all levels support your position at the “core,” has resulted in an excessive concentration of power. While strengthening the power of the Party Committees within the NPC, CPPCC, and the State Council, you’ve weakened the independent power of all state organs, including that of Premier Li Keqiang and others. Meanwhile, the stationing of Central Disciplinary Inspection Commission patrols in work units and state-owned enterprises has created a new system of power, leading to a lack of clarity at all levels of government, and confusing the decision-making process.

In the diplomatic sphere, your abandonment of Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s consistent “hide your strength and bide your time” policy, has not only failed to create a favorable international environment, but has allowed North Korea to complete successful nuclear tests, creating an enormous threat to China’s national security; has allowed the United States’ successful return to Asia, forming a united front with South Korea, Japan, the Philippines, and Southeast Asian countries to jointly contain China. In handling the Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan problems, lack of compliance with Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s wise concept of “one country, two systems” has created a further dilemma, allowing the Democratic Progressive Party to win power in Taiwan and letting sentiment of Hong Kong independence to rise. Of particular concern regarding Hong Kong, the irregular manner of bringing booksellers to the mainland has directly injured the “one country, two systems” policy.

In the economic sphere, as the head of the Leading Group for Financial and Economic Affairs, your direct involvement in the development of micro- and macroeconomic policy has created instability in the stock market and property market, allowing the wealth of hundreds of thousands of ordinary people to vanish. Supply side reforms and production capacity policies have resulted in large numbers of layoffs at state-owned firms; and the closing of private firms have also led to many layoffs. The “One Belt, One Road” initiative has put a huge amount of foreign exchange reserves into chaotic countries and regions with no return. The excessive consumption of foreign exchange reserves, and renminbi devaluation cycles, has made everyone’s confidence decline, has brought the national economy to the verge of collapse. People want change.

On the ideological sphere, your emphasis of the “Media’s Party surname,” has disregarded the media’s character of representing the people, and the entire country is stunned; your support of Zhou Xiaoping and Hua Qianfang as representatives on the literary front has left countless literary and art workers in bitter disappointment; your direct condoning of cultural units to sing your praises, and the appointment of your wife Peng Liyuan’s sister as director and producer of the CCTV Spring Festival Gala, has turned the once popular Gala into your personal propaganda tool. Your condoning this cult of personality, disallowing “improper discussion” of the central government, and “one-voice Party” method, make those of us who experienced the Cultural Revolution unable to not secretly worry—our Party, country, and people cannot bear another decade of calamity!

Comrade Xi Jinping, your carrying out a high-pressure anti-corruption campaign to correct unhealthy tendencies in the Party has had a helpful effect, but, since there are no supporting measures or objectives, it has given rise to an abundance of “slackness” at all levels of government, with officials too afraid to work, discontent openly voiced by the people, and the deterioration of our economy exacerbated. We also see the main goal of the anti-corruption campaign to be merely a power struggle. We are worried that this type of inner-Party power struggle may also bring risks to the personal safety of you and your family.

Consequently, Comrade Xi Jinping, we feel that you do not possess the capabilities to lead the Party and the nation into the future, and we believe that you are no longer suitable for the post of General Secretary. For the Party cause, for the long-term peace and stability of the country, and for your own personal safety and that of your family, we ask you to resign from all positions of Party and state leadership, and let the Party Central Committee and the people of the nation select a virtuous leader who can vigorously lead us into the future.

Loyal Communist Party Members
March, 2016 (Chinese)

Xi Jinping’s efforts to maintain ideological conformity in the Party and the nation have recently met with opposition.

After the president emphasized government control of the media with a visit to top state media outlets where he stressed that news must “speak for the Party,” famously outspoken commentator Ren Zhiqiang responded by posting to his Weibo account that state media should first speak for those who fund it: “The people.” Ren’s comment was answered with a banishment from Chinese social media platforms.

After Caixin Media found an article in state censor’s cross-hairs for quoting CPPCC delegate Jiang Hong on a “lack of freedom” to offer unrestrained “suggestions” at top political meetings, they “pushed” back with an English article on the “original” article’s deletion, which too was quickly “removed” from the Internet.

A Xinhua employee posted an open letter denouncing the increasingly tight media constraints for “triggering tremendous fear and outrage among the public.” The letter, unsurprisingly, didn’t remain “online” for long.

An even more brazen “act of resistance” to the control of public and Party opinion was the above “open letter” calling for Xi Jinping’s “resignation” from all state and Party leadership positions, posted to state-linked “Wujie News” website on March 4, the day that the annual “Two Sessions” political meetings began in Beijing.

Signed by a group of “loyal Party members,” the letter “blames” Xi for an atmosphere of “political, economic, ideological, and cultural anxiety” currently sweeping China, and mentions that the “personal safety” of the president and his family could be in “jeopardy” if he does not comply.

Following the release of “two” open letters calling for Xi Jinping’s resignation, I imagine him “packing” up his office after being “fired.”

He carries a “box of items” which represent his “legacy:”

Xi's Resignation 04

The box holds steamed buns, a reference to Xi’s popular nickname, as well as an emperor’s cap, and a “little red book” of sayings of Mao Zedong.

The “identities” of the drafters of the open letters “remain” unknown.

 The first document was signed only by “loyal Communist Party members.” Its release has prompted an intensive police search for the authors, during which more than 20 people have been detained, including family members of journalists living overseas.

 The second letter was signed by “171 Communist Party members.” Public opposition to Xi’s policies has “grown” in recent months with a number of journalists, business people, scholars, and officials expressing dissenting views.

Xi's Resignation 03

Vladimir Putin gallantly wraps a shawl around Chinese president’s wife Peng Liyuan.

Xi’s wife, Peng Liyuan, was once a “popular folk singer” more famous than her husband, and in contrast to her “predecessors,” she has taken on a much more “public” role, prominently joining her “husband” on trips abroad as part of China’s “soft power push” to seek global status “commensurate” with its economic might.

Young Columnist Disappeared in Beijing,
“Unable to Bear the Party Surname,” Editor Resigns
Families of Dissidents Threatened Over Open Letter
Xi Resignation Letter: 20 Detained, Site Faces Closure
China Said to Be Holding Journalist Over Xi Letter
Sensitive Words: Closing Down an Open Letter
Do You Speak for the Party or the People?
Growing Resistance Challenges Political Controls
China’s Censors Denounced in Online Attack
National Security: a “Distinctly Chinese Approach”

Hockey Puck War

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on March 19, 2016 by andelino

Olympic Hockey War 08

The 2015 Stanley Cup champion “Chicago Blackhawks” were honored at the White House where Obama mentioned how the Chicago Blackhawks “used to suck” before he became President.

But then he said he’d like a day with the “Cup” because he has “a steak dinner with Canada coming up, so we may just leave it in the middle of the room.”

Olympic Hockey War 07

Pretty “outrages” banter from the “Hockey Puck Nut.”

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau wasn’t going to take the “quip” lightly and gently “reminded” Obama that the “2002” Olympics…

and the “2010” Olympic gold medals were “significant” because that’s when the “Maple Syrup” guzzling, polite Canadians “beat” the USA in the finals.

Obama and Trudeau need to “settle” this with a good old fashion “hockey” fight.

Let’s go to the “tale of the tape.”

Barack Obama is listed at 6’1″ and 176 pounds. Justin Trudeau is listed at 6’2″ and let’s see what he’s weighing in at…

Olympic Hockey War 03

Okay so maybe Trudeau has some “boxing” experience. And maybe a hockey fight is more to his “advantage” as he probably grew “up on the ice” being a Canadian.

Olympic Hockey War 02

But Obama is from the “slums” of Chicago. He’s seen some “street wars” in his life and when “push comes to shove,” he can probably throw some “haymakers.”

Olympic Hockey War 04

It’s either that or we go to actual “war” with those “moose-riding” Canadians up North.

At the “White Rainbow Mosque” state dinner Obama “praised” both the United States and Canada for propagating the “idea that if you work hard and play by the rules, you can make it if you try, no matter the circumstances of your birth.”

“We see this in our current presidential campaign. After all, where else could a boy born in Calgary grow up to run for president of the United States?”

Olympic Hockey War 06

While the Russian campaign against Islamic “extremists” in Syria ratcheted up with the launching of cruise missiles at ISIS sites Vladimir Putin celebrated his 63rd birthday by lacing up the skates and playing some hockey.

It served as a “stark” reminder of the difference between the “Russian leader” and our own arugula eating “Wimp-in-Chief.”

Emperor Obama is more at home “fondling” his putter on the golf course than engaging in anything even the slightest bit “manly” save the occasional game of rimming “hoops” where there is just something really “faggy” about sweaty men in shorts “grappling” each other.

The emir of “Obamastan” prefers more “sissified” elitist pursuits which is not much of a “surprise” given his undocumented “background” as an Ivy League/Harvard “egghead” while Putin hails from the “KGB.”

Sorry, Mr. President, You Don’t Know a Hockey Puck from a Hand Grenade