Archive for takfir

Takfir Infidels

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , on November 3, 2019 by andelino

The recent, long overdue “death” of ISIS chieftain Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi raises the question: “What now?”

ISIS still exists. Its offshoots have “metastasized” all over the world, among jihad movements that fly its flag, such as Boko Haram and al-Shabaab. And its members certainly haven’t “repented.” So what now?

ISIS always had an inherent “strength”: the fervor of Islam. It likewise always had a “vulnerability”: the fervor of Islam. This vulnerability can be exploited.

“Takfir” is an Arabic word best translated into English as “apostate.” This means someone who has left “true” Islam. In Islam, takfir is worse than “infidel.” It is worse than Christian, because at least Christians have not committed the sin of leaving Islam; they were never in it. Takfir is worse than pagan or Christian or Shia. It is even worse than Jew.

In Islam, a difference of opinion of theology between two Muslims means that “If a man calls a brother takfir, then at least one of them is right” according to the Hadith, attributed to Prophet Muhammad.

Therefore, by definition, the other is “wrong,” and being “wrong” means “takfir.” It is not an accusation to be tossed around lightly, because anyone making such an accusation is opening himself up to the same charge.

This was all described in an excellent article that appeared in the Atlantic monthly magazine in 2015: What ISIS Really Wants.”

It describes the rise of “ISIS” and its founding “caliph” Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. In view of the death of al-Baghdadi in the recent Special Forces raid, this article deserves renewed attention, because it contains hints on how to “exterminate” ISIS once and for all should it raise its “ugly” head again.

“Eschatology” is defined as a branch of theology that deals with prophecies concerning the “End Times.” In Christianity, this primarily means the Book of Revelation and the Book of Daniel.

Islamic eschatology is murkier and more “obscure” than the Christian one, because there is no lengthy source for it.  Instead, Islamic eschatology consists of hints gleaned from the “Qur’an or a Hadith.”

A “Hadith” is a quotation from Islam’s founder, “Prophet” Muhammad. A Hadith is not considered a direct quotation from Allah — those are duly recorded in the Qur’an — but instead comes only from “Prophet” Muhammad, relayed to us via a chain called an “Isnad” of hearsay witnesses. For this reason, some are considered more reliable than others, and the most esteemed of the compilers of Hadiths, Al-Bukhari, actually rejected about 80% of the 300,000 purported Hadiths he examined as being worthless.

The Atlantic article discusses all of this in far greater detail than this writer will here, but for our purposes, Islamic eschatology comes down to this: “only a true caliph can establish an Islamic state.” After the twelfth true caliph, the “Islamic Armageddon” will occur, and the Mahdi will arrive to rule over a “unified” Islamic world. To qualify as a true caliph, the candidate must come from the “Quraysh” tribe that originally inhabited Mecca and must control a stretch of northern “Syria,” from modern Iraq to the Mediterranean.

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi certainly qualified for the first criterion. And when he founded the Islamic State, he controlled the stretch of “Syrian” land mentioned in the prophecies.  In his view, he was the “eighth” true caliph.

What would the Islamic Armageddon look like?  It would consist of the armies of “Rome” converging on Dabiq, where they will meet the armies of “Islam” for the final showdown.  Dabiq is a town in northwest Syria, very near the Turkish border and about forty miles northeast of Aleppo. Al-Baghdadi took this “prophecy” so seriously that he even named his slick ISIS propaganda magazine Dabiq.  At least he did, until Turkish-backed Syrian rebels took the place in October 2016.  The magazine has since borne the title “Rumiya,” after another Islamic prophecy concerning the End Times.

These facts suggest “weaknesses” for ISIS that can prove to be “fatal” if exploited cleverly enough. For one thing, anyone who “claims” to be the caliph and then falls down on the job must “never” have been the caliph. Worse, he must be “takfir”, because he made a “false” Islamic claim.  And worst of all, his followers must all be “takfir”, too!

Although al-Baghdadi made a credible claim to be the caliph, he lost his territory, including the town of Dabiq. No true caliph can do that if he wants to retain the title of caliph. When al-Baghdadi lost his caliphate, he proved himself to be just another “false” caliph. Therefore, he must have been nothing but a “takfir infidel.” His followers must likewise be takfir.

Another recent “wannabe” caliph was Muslim Barack Hussein Obama who also proved to be a “false” caliph, and therefore a “takfir infidel.”

This suggests the line of propaganda that the Trump Administration should now take: “demoralize what is left of ISIS, by shouting that they are all just a bunch of takfir infidels.” Utilize Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals Number 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” In other words “endlessly ridicule ISIS.”

Keep “pounding” this point, day after day. The best time to “kick” a man is when he is already “down” and ISIS is certainly down right now.

Suppose that the “caliphate” revives itself? What do we do then? The prophecy of “Dabiq” also suggests a strategy to wipe out the next “caliphate,” if and when it arrives. Utilize Alinsky’s Rule for Radicals Number 4, which is “Make the enemy live up to his own book of rules.”

The way to do this is to “seize” the town of Dabiq. Drop a brigade combat team of the 101st Airborne Division onto the place, with orders to dig in and wait for “Neo-ISIS” to arrive. And arrive it will. It will not be able not to. For if an army of “Rome”, which is what modern America certainly is, takes Dabiq, then that must mean that the “End Times” are here and the Islamic Armageddon at hand. For a devout follower of ISIS to see that and not take up “arms and fight” the modern “Romans,” is to implicitly “reject” the prophecy.

Which can be nothing but “takfir.” Any Neo-ISIS follower who so reveals himself as “takfir”, proves himself to be undeserving of entry into “Allah’s Great Whorehouse in The Sky.”

In the end, it’s like in the movie Field of Dreams: “If you build it, they will come.” If “Rome” seizes the town of Dabiq, then Neo-ISIS will come. It will be forced to so because failure to do so is “disbelief in the prophecy and therefore takfir.”

And then? Well, “Dabiq” is in the middle of a flat plain consisting of farmland. Any Neo-ISIS army converging there will be right in the open with no cover. And when that Neo-ISIS army “converges” on Dabiq, then that’s why God invented “B-52s” with their Arc Light air raids.

And that’s how to deal with “ISIS” if it ever returns.

 Islam & ISIS
Islamic State Names Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi as Leader

%d bloggers like this: