Archive for socialist

Blue City Domino Theory

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on September 20, 2020 by andelino

We know the Socialist Democrats and the fake news mainstream media are going to “blame” anything and everything on Trump at every opportunity.

Now they’re blaming the “unrest” in the big blue cities on Trump. No, it’s not the fault of the long ensconced, far-left Democrat mayors in those cities…it’s all Trump’s fault.

The mayors wouldn’t do anything to stem the violent “chaos”, er, “peaceful protests” in their cities. They have also seen to it that law breaking “protestors” are promptly released almost as fast as they’re arrested.

This frustrates the police departments. The mayors have a cure for that to “dismantle” the police. Some even want to eliminate jails, courts and the justice system itself.

The lying corporate media won’t blame “The Bolshevik” mayors. Instead, they say Trump and his White House engage in “systemic racism” and “divisiveness.” Trump is blamed for not doing anything to solve the “violence” in the cities and if he threatens to send in “storm troopers” he’s attacked even harder.

All stops are being pulled. The “drums of fear” are beating incessantly to promote the “scamdemic” while the big city “dominoes” continue to fall. By creating a relentless atmosphere of “disaster” the Socialist Democrats hope the citizens will grow “fatigued” and vote for demented figurehead “Sniffy” Joe Biden. That would be the real disaster.

“Sniffy” Joe criticized President Donald Trump’s executive order paving the way for a “payroll tax” holiday years after former President Barack Obama called it “inexcusable” for lawmakers not to extend a similar cut during the recovery from the 2008 recession.

Trump signed an executive order ordering a payroll tax holiday from August 1 through the end of 2020 in an attempt to “boost” an economy struggling from the coronavirus pandemic shutdowns.

Biden called the order “a reckless war on Social Security” in contrast to Obama’s decision in 2011 to “sign” a similar payroll tax cut.

Trump’s order specifies that the deferral period would begin September 1, with the president suggesting it could be retroactive to August 1. The president also suggested that he might make permanent payroll tax cuts if he is reelected in November.

“If I win, I may extend and terminate,” he said Saturday while announcing the order.“In other words, I’ll extend it beyond the end of the year and terminate the tax,” Trump said.

Major changes to the country’s tax code fall under the purview of Congress, meaning the president cannot unilaterally forgive tax debts, according to the Washington Post.

Biden took issue with Trump’s willingness to consider a permanent cut. “He is laying out his roadmap to cutting Social Security,” Biden falsely claimed while drawing a distinction between Obama’s cuts and Trump’s move. “Our seniors and millions of Americans with disabilities are under enough stress without Trump putting their hard-earned Social Security benefits in doubt.” 

“Biden now says that it is a reckless war on social security.” — Eddie Zipperer (@EddieZipperer) August 9, 2020

“Sniffy” Joe argued that, unlike his Democratic predecessor, Trump’s order doesn’t provide “protections or guarantees that the Social Security Trust Fund will be made whole.”

Obama criticized lawmakers in 2011 who opposed any calls to reduce the tax cut while Americans were dealing with the fallout from the 2008 recession. He said it was “inexcusable” not to boost the economy with a payroll tax holiday.

“It is my expectation, in fact it would be inexcusable for Congress not to further extend this middle-class tax cut for the rest of the year,” Obama said during a press conference in 2011 addressing ways to help an ailing economy. “This is a way to boost the economy that has been supported by these very same Democrats and Republicans in the past.”

Employees and their employers each pay Social Security payroll taxes of 6.2 percent of wages. Biden proposed in March that he would increase the payroll tax rate for Americans making in excess of $400,000, The Hill reported in March.

The economy plummeted after governors and mayors began instituting economic lockdowns to slow the spread of the coronavirus pandemic, which originated in Wuhan, China, in late December before spreading to the United States, where it has reportedly infected162,000 people, according to data from John Hopkins University.

Was Jesus a Socialist?

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on August 11, 2020 by andelino

Was Jesus a Socialist?
By: E.F. Charles

Some like to say that Jesus was a socialist. Perhaps it was the “robe and sandals.” But is it true? I believe the greater proof supports that Jesus was an “entrepreneur” who believed deeply in “free markets, free will and marketplace ideas.”  

He “condemned” leaders that put personal aggrandizement over individual success, as do most socialist leaders. As further proof, I submit the following about Jesus:

Jesus “sold” and did not impose His message: Jesus, the Word made flesh, had an empire to build. He was given a mission to bring God’s plan of salvation to mankind. Rather than assume authority over an organization and use it to impose His message on man, Jesus took God’s message directly to the people and invited them to listen. He blazed a trail straight into the marketplace of ideas with His revolutionary and disruptive message unafraid of offending the disbelievers, hypocrites and the powerful. He trusted that His message alone would be enough to convince listeners that His was the Divine Word. Over two thousand years and over 1 billion followers later, I would say His enterprise was a success.

He hired on merit and in consultation with God: Jesus personally selected each of his twelve apostles from among His many disciples. He knew that His legacy depended, in large part, on the team He assembled to continue His work after His death and therefore, chose each apostle carefully. Like a seasoned entrepreneur, Jesus made this very important decision only after prayerful consultation with God, His primary stakeholder. Each apostle earned their place on the team.

He believed in free will: With all His power and authority, Jesus did not impose his message on us. Even though He knew it was the Divine Word, the path to salvation, He permitted mankind the choice to follow Him or not.

He was results oriented: Jesus was extremely concerned about the success of His mission. He was not here marking time, like a government bureaucrat. He knew the urgency and importance of His work and became frustrated when His apostles did not understand His teachings. In Matthew 17:17 (also Mark 9:14-28 and Luke 9:37-42), Jesus seemed very frustrated with the apostle’s lack of faith after they failed to cast the demon out of the boy. After Jesus stepped in and healed the boy possessed of demons, He exclaimed “How much longer must I be with you? Why must I put up with you?” This sounds very much like a man concerned with results. He did not hand out participation trophies.

He was interested in tangible goals: Saving souls was Jesus’s mission on earth. Each saved soul was tangible proof of His success. Like an entrepreneur, who lives for His mission and understands the power of messaging, Jesus knew that, to succeed, He had to convince mankind that His message was the Divinely inspired Word of God that, if freely accepted, would lead all souls to Heaven. Rather than barter the Kingdom in exchange for personal gain, like the Pharisees or modern socialists, Jesus took the success of his mission and the salvation of souls right to the Cross.

He condemned leaders who deceive: Like the rebel that He was, Jesus called out the religious authorities of his time as hypocrites and worse for utilizing their positions of authority to mislead and deceive their followers. He accused them of not letting those who wish to enter the Kingdom of Heaven do so. In the Woes of the Pharisees (Matthew 23) Jesus made clear his scorn for those in authority who, like our modern socialists, lead people from their rightful inheritance for personal gain. These leaders pride fully put their glory ahead of their service to the people and Jesus rebuked them in saying “They tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on peoples shoulders but they themselves are not willing to move them with their finger” (Matthew 23:4).

He set up procedures to ensure his legacy outlived his life on earth: Like an entrepreneur, who scales a successful enterprise, Jesus made certain that he had a plan of succession. Jesus spent three years preparing his apostles to be leaders and carry on His ministry. He personally schooled each of them on Scripture, taught them how to deepen their faith, how to teach and inspire and gave them the deeper understanding of His parables that, once understood, unlock the gates of Heaven. As planned, these men traveled far and wide, after His death and resurrection, to spread His teachings and ignite a revolution. On Peter, His rock, He built His Church which continues to shine brightly today.

Jesus certainly was “not a socialist.” Jesus introduced the Holy Spirit into this world and where the Holy Spirit dwells there is freedom. Conversely, socialism “robs” us of our freedom.

Socialism “denies and disrespects” the divinity and individuality of each of God’s children. It replaces worship of God with worship of the state and allows the state to pick winners and losers.

A socialist government cares little about God or our relationship to Him. By design it is “anathema” to God in that it governs by lack and subtraction, taking from one to give to another.

By design God’s governance is one of plenty and multiplication always adding more to whatever is given.

Bernie Sanders Softer Side

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on February 14, 2020 by andelino

While Senator Bernie Sanders is known mostly for his “thoughtful” and serious policy positions, the self-proclaimed “Democratic Socialist” has another, lesser known side.

Though hard for the “uninformed” low information voters to appreciate, Sanders’ adoring throngs of “Bernie-Bros” presciently see through his “gruff” exterior to his softer side; a side filled with “compassion and generosity” with other peoples money.

One of many stories Sanders told over his career to illustrate his “softer side” was when he confirmed that the Republican and Democratic parties are “alike” and reinforce his “support” for Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela.

The Senator’s “softer side” was clearly revealed in a 1972 interview when the then 31-year-old Sanders was “running” for governor of Vermont. During the interview, Sanders was asked whether it “bothered” him that some people referred to him as a “communist.”

Sanders responded, “I don’t mind people coming up and calling me a communist.” At least, they’re still “alive.” If I minded, they wouldn’t be.

Bernie no longer favors government takeover as “the major means of production.” But his four-decade quest for political “revolution” runs still through his blood vessels.

Bernie’s “generosity, patience and compassion” do, however, have their limits. The Sanders campaign knows that “compassion” alone cannot win a “revolution.” It must also be accompanied by violence.

The “violence,” nevertheless, is not to be unfettered. Bernie’s “compassion” could never allow that. Although whole cities must be burned to the ground if Sanders does not get the presidential nomination, a campaign field organizer did admit that campaign staff have been warned, if possible, to avoid some of the excesses of the “1917 Russian revolution.”

Bernie “softer side” was also observed when he took off his shirt at a party singing “This Land is Your Land” that culminated in drunken singing of “communist” songs with his Russian friends “celebrating” his honeymoon.

It is well understood among his campaign staff that if someone “annoys” Bernie such as Hillary Clinton, that person will have their hair set on fire in the street. Disagreeing with him will result in being forcibly sent to a re-education camp.

The crime of selfishly “owning” more houses than Bernie will be remedied either by renouncing ownership or execution. Finally, anyone greedy enough to have more “money” than him will be guillotined.

Bernie’s close Russian friend, Irina Alexandrovevskivich, understands that when government runs things, people are happier and better off. Long lines for “bread and gasoline” are good and people enjoy “lining” up for hours.

In stark contrast with Bernie, “angry” Chris Matthews with “tingling” running up both his legs stated that socialism does not work saying that “Reds Would Have Executions in Central Park!”

While praising Amy Klobuchar, Matthews said, “She had the guts to talk about the issue of this campaign, socialism. Some people like it. Those of us like me who grew up in the Cold War and saw some aspects of it after visiting places like Vietnam, Cuba, being there, I’ve seen what socialism is. I don’t like it. It’s not only not free. It doesn’t freaking work.”

He continued, “I have my own views of the word socialist, and I’ll be glad to share them with you in private. They go back to the early 1950s. I have an attitude about them. I remember the Cold War. I have an attitude towards Castro. I believe if Castro and the Reds had won the Cold War, there would have been executions in Central Park. And I would have been one of the ones executed, and certain other people would be there cheering. So, I have a problem with people for the other side. I don’t know what Bernie means by socialism. One week it’s Denmark. We’re going to be like Denmark. I’m like that’s harmless, a capitalist program with a lot of good social programs.”

He concluded, scared of feeling the bern, “That’s a great question, what did you think of Castro? We all thought he was great at first. I was cheering like mad for him when he first came in, and then he became a Communist and started shooting every one of his enemies.”

Where was Matthews during all the years since his mentor, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan was concerned about American “intelligentsia” defining deviancy down? Thanks for getting “worried” about your own well-being, Chris!

Pope Francis Effect

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on December 13, 2019 by andelino

Francis Effect: Catholic membership drops sharply in Argentina
By Monica Showalter

Pope Francis, who was widely reported to have been chosen for the highest office in the Catholic Church as a means of “reinvigorating” participation among Latinos, isn’t quite working out the way they thought he would.

He was supposed to be the people’s pope, with “the smell of the sheep” on him as he put it. But all he’s managed to do is become an advocate for the “phony claims of socialism and climate change.” That may be the problem.

Here’s the item from the Buenos Aires Herald:

“Catholicism is on the decline in Pope Francis’ Argentina, a new study from the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) has revealed.”

The results also showed that close to three-quarters of the population believes the State should not finance religious institutions, while 46.2 percent believe that religious education should not be taught in public schools. 

The government agency published study is revealing that while Catholics remain the biggest religious force in Argentina by a long way, the number of faithful has fallen by more than 13 percentage points over the past decade. 

According to CONICET, 76.5 percent of the population said they were Catholics in 2008, compared to the 62.9 percent who say so today.” 

Which is a pretty “miserable” record for a supposed “people’s” pope. Instead of raising enthusiasm or “participation” in the Church, Pope Francis seems to have achieved the “opposite” effect.

A decline in “membership” seems to have actually accelerated.

Now, it’s possible to argue that this isn’t his fault. The Church was in “decline” before he was elected pope, and older lines of faith everywhere are seeing declines in membership, as a function of “broken families, urbanization, secularization, rising incomes, tech and the appeal of the Evangelicals,” they all have some roles to play.

But to imagine that none of this is Pope Francis’s “fault” is kind of unsatisfactory, too. He is, after all, a “favorite” son, and we’ve seen the effect of that from Pope John Paul II’s papacy on Poland. That Pope Francis is Argentinean ought to be worth something in Argentina … “and it’s not.”

The poll errantly premises falling popular support for the Church with falling popular support for state funding of Argentinean church institutions as part of this trend. Actually, that mixes apples with oranges, state funding is what tends to drive Church membership down, so falling support is probably a good thing.

State funding is a very significant reason why Catholic membership is at “rock-bottom” levels in Europe and churches are going empty. In Germany, church membership even requires special high “compulsory” taxes, which is why many Germans say “no thanks.”

When the state is the big daddy and the source of all “social welfare”, doing the charity and all the things the Christian participants are supposed to do willingly on their own, who “needs the Church?” The state’s the story, nobody’s individually responsible, and the Church fades.

Which brings us back to Pope Francis. The pontiff, despite his reputation, is constantly “defending” the state rather than the people. He even defends the “indefensible”, such as the Venezuelan state. The state, to him, is the source of all “salvation” to the people, which is why he always sides with “socialists” and other statists, no matter what the issue.

It’s why he talks about “global warming” when churches are being set on fire by “socialists” in places like Chile. It’s why he chose the Chinese government over the “underground” Church in China. It’s why he “stiff armed” the Ukrainian unite Catholics in favor of an alliance with the state linked “Orthodox” leaders. It’s always the state for him. Sound appealing? Not to me.

Which might just be why they’re staying away in Argentina, too. He never manages to put in a good word for the people. It ought to be a public relations problem for him at the very least since it’s unlikely that as a “dyed-in-the-wool” socialist he’s going to figure this out on his own.

The “sheep” are going a different direction, they’d apparently like a bit less “state” in the Church, even if there isn’t a large amount of clarity.

Maybe the “selectors” of the next pope can take this unexpectedly “weak” performance to heart.

Pope Signals Closeness to China
True Peace Is Unarmed Peace.
Decries Japan’s Increasing Youth Suicide Rates.
Vatican financial watchdog now a ‘shell’ after police raid

Equal Gifts For All

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on December 1, 2018 by andelino

Our beloved Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is in for a winning streak!

Demographic projections have elucidated that somewhere within the coming 5 years the Mechanized Migrant Divisions will be able to flip some important red states. First we take Austin, then we take Tallahassee. Meanwhile the Airborne Muslim Brigade continues its march through Minnesota. So the good news is that by 2024 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez will become the first empress of MexiAmerica.

This means that by 2025 we will be able to raise income taxes to 99%. The problem is that the USA will still be a pretty rich country when we start destroying it. Even our advisors from Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea have no clue how we can distribute that amount of wealth to each according to their needs until nothing is left.

We have sent operatives to the far corners of the earth, looking for someone with sufficient know-how and experience in giving away endless amounts of free stuff. It was no easy task, but we have prevailed. So it is in a spirit of jubilation that I can officially announce the 2024 ticket to be Santa Claus / Ocasio-Cortez. No one but Santa with his magical powers will be able to convert all of America’s accumulated capital into toys and freebies for the toiling masses.

Already we are establishing re-education camps where elves will learn all about their white privilege. Santa’s sleigh is being refurbished into a completely carbon-neutral vehicle. The “diverse” reindeer Comet, Cupid, Donner, Blitzen, Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen and Rudolph have been halal-compliant slaughtered to prevent methane-containing flatulence. Regulations are being drafted to force citizens to widen their chimneys, so the government can have unobstructed 24/7/365 days access to the living rooms of its subjects.

Red Santa is rising. Soon, it will be Christmas all year long. Everyone will be very happy with whatever freebies our dear leader Santa will give us. Forever. And ever. And ever. Ho, Ho, Ho.

No wonder Santa always wears so much Red. I am excited at this prospect for 2020 and beyond. Hat Tip

Ocasio-Cortez Goes To Washington
The Wisdom of Ocasio-Cortez
Cortez the Shiller  

Obamification of Francis

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on September 23, 2015 by andelino

Obamification 01

Some pontiffs have been “beatified or canonized,” but Pope Francis is receiving a far more “dubious” honor.

He’s being “Obamified.”

The charismatic Pope, who arrives in the United States on September 22, has gained fans “in and out” of the Catholic Church for “denouncing unfettered capitalism, warning about climate change and urging mercy toward divorced couples and women who have had abortions.”

He’s also sparked a “strange” trend. The same political “slurs and conspiracy” theories that critics have “used” against President Barack Obama are now being “deployed” against Pope Francis.

Critics even says the two leaders have “morphed” into one sinister figure they calls “Popama.”

Obamification 00

The “Obamification” of Pope Francis includes “charges” from conservative critics that he’s either a “socialist, the Antichrist, an illegitimately elected leader who wants to create a New World Order” or all of the above.

Their anxiety was “captured” by the headline of one online column: “Pope Francis is the Catholic Church’s Obama — God help us.”

Such “apocalyptic” warnings about Francis reflect normal “anxiety” over a new leader, says Greg Erlandson, publisher of “Our Sunday Visitor,” a Catholic organization that distributes church textbooks and religious materials.

“There’s been some crazy stuff going around,” Erlandson says. “You’re always going to get a fringe element, on both the left and right. There’s some guy in Canada claiming to be the Pope.”

Obamification 02

Yet conservative “concerns” over Pope Francis appear to be “growing.”

A Gallup “poll” this summer showed that Pope Francis’ “support” among American conservatives “fell” from 72% last year to 45% in July.

“There is a sense that he is or could be introducing significant changes in the church,” Erlandson said, “and people find that very threatening.”

Some of that “anxiety” goes beyond traditional “debate” over church doctrine.

Here are three ways the Pope is being “Obamified”:

No. 1: He’s a stealth socialist for religion and money. It’s hard to find a more combustible combination. Pope Francis’ comments on faith and finance have ignited a theological firestorm.

No. 2: He said the poor have “sacred rights” of labor, lodging and land. He called the “unfettered pursuit of money” the “dung of the devil” and accused world leaders of “cowardice” for refusing to defend the Earth from exploitation.

No. 3: During a speech to grassroots organizers in Bolivia in July, he called on the poor to rise up against “new colonialism,” including corporations, loan agencies, free trade treaties and austerity measures.

Obamification 04

There is another “world” leader, elected amid “huge” excitement, who has “surprised and disappointed” the faithful by appearing “disengaged and helpless” in moments of crisis.

Now we can watch “Jorge Mario Bergoglio” turn into “Barack Hussein Obama.”

Pope Francis: Europe’s Anti-Child Attitudes Invite Migrants, Jihadis
Freedom of Speech Should Not Allow Ridiculing Islam’
Pope Francis feels ‘used’ by fake friends
Church Must Find Ways of Welcoming Divorced Catholics, Gays
Pope Francis Says He Does Not Judge Gay Priests
Pope Francis said Catholics don’t have to be ‘like rabbits’
Jorge Mario Bergoglio and Argentina’s “Dirty War”
The Antichrist & False Prophet Align For Global Islamic Blasphemy Laws!
The New World Kings: Pope Francis and Barack Obama

White House Invites Transvestite, Pro-Abortion Nun, Gay Bishop to Greet Pope
Francis Gets Eco-Friendly Altar for D.C. Mass
Vatican Welcomes Iran Deal, Pressures Israel to Give Up Nuke
Pope Goes Off Script to Underscore Man-Woman Marriage
Why I Am Boycotting Pope Francis’ Address to Congress

Democrat vs. Socialist

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on August 15, 2015 by andelino

Socialism 02

In a recent MSNBC “interview,” Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz couldn’t “explain” the difference between a Democrat and a Socialist.

This seems to have become a “problematic” meme for DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Her party’s second-most “visible” candidate, Bernie Sanders, describes himself as a “democratic socialist,” a hot-button term from which many mainstream Democrats seek to “distance” themselves.

Asked by MSNBC’s Chris (Tingling) Matthews to “describe” if there is any “difference,” Wasserman Schultz was unable to explain it, instead focusing on the obvious “distinctions” between her party and the Republicans.

NBC’s “Meet the Press” moderator Chuck Todd “pressed” the DNC chairwoman with that same “exact” question and she once again failed to explain the difference.

Of course, while the “difference” is actually quite simple to explain — see here — it poses a problem for DWS because “agreeing” that Dems are different from democratic “socialists” would outright suggest Sanders does not “belong” in her party’s primary.

Fast forward, “neither” could young college students in the video from Campus Reform explain the “difference.”

Socialists completely agree: “There is no difference.”

In fact, they just released a video “claiming” that they can see at least “5 ways America is already socialist.” Posted on Facebook, it has collected almost 9 million views in just 9 days.

WARNING: head-exploding content unless you are a “socialist” or a “low-information” voter.

These are possibly the 5 best “sentences” you’ll ever read. Unfortunately, most “liberal” voters don’t know these.

1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, by legislating the wealth out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them; and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work, because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.

Socialism 01

Socialism is a philosophy of failure,
the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy,
its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
Winston Churchill

Marxism in America

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on October 23, 2010 by andelino

 Marxism in America

At one time, being a communist in America was a bad thing.

Today, political correctness has led to a desensitization among the public about labeling government policies, programs and actions as “socialist”, “communist”, or “Marxist.” We’re told that we have to be open to the idea of socialism – the redistribution of wealth and the intervention of government into every aspect of our lives. We’re told that some of the ideas and policies of communism (and fascism) are actually viable alternatives to try, even though the very ideas in actual application run completely counter to the founding principles of these United States.

It seems that the majority of the American public has absolutely no idea what this actually means. Sure, it looks great on paper, but in actual practice these political and economic philosophies have led to the imprisonment and deaths of, literally, millions of people.

A favorite T-shirt available at Protest Warrior tries to point out the obvious:

“Communism only killed a hundred million people. Let’s give it another try.”

Will the United States eventually end up as a communist economic and political system? Many argue that the merger of corporations and state indicates we’re moving in the direction of fascism, not communism. While we won’t disagree with this statement, we opine that when looking at the political spectrum, with communism on the far left and fascism on the far right, one can’t help but notice the systems are very closely related. In fact, the political spectrum, as far as we’re concerned, doesn’t actually look like the traditional model(s) we were taught in school:

Or another, more succinct, view that completely redefines the spectrum we’ve come to know from mainstream thought:

Call it what you will, in the end, both fascism and communism are totalitarian forms of government. In the end, you are no longer free.

Illusion of Opposites

Both, republicans and democrats, it seems, are leading us in the very same direction. This is clear when you put aside the rhetoric they use in front of media cameras and look at their actions over the last 50 years. We can blame Bush. We can blame Obama. We can blame Clinton. We can blame Reagan. However, the laws, policies and restrictions put forth by our Presidents and Congressional representatives have progressively deteriorated our liberties – regardless of which political party was in office or Congress. Until the majority of the American people realize this, no change will come to America – at least not until the entire system as we know it comes crashing down.

At the risk of aggravating and alienating some of our readers, we suggest that supporting a traditional democrat and/or traditional republican candidate is moving the country, as a whole, further left on the Left vs. Right: True View” political spectrum. According to that spectrum, it seems that the majority of Americans could be considered “leftists.”

In the following video, Lt. Gen. (Ret) Boykin discusses the many signs that America is rapidly degenerating into a totalitarian dictatorship. No, you may not see it just yet because you can still enjoy a Starbucks coffee everyday or write what you want on your blog without worrying about you and your family being lined up against wall and executed, but a shift to totalitarianism doesn’t have to happen overnight – and there doesn’t necessarily have to be a single leader. It’s a process, in our case, a multi-decades long process that erodes individual liberty and freedom over time.

Lt. Gen. Boykin discusses how Marxism is invading America:

The Evolution of Marxism in America

%d bloggers like this: