Sharia Flogging

Muslim Congresswoman Ilhan Omar called for a “Sharia” punishment with“80 Stripes” of flogging for her critics who have accused her of “adultery affair with Tim Mynett.”

“And those who accuse chaste women, and produce not four witnesses, flog them with eighty stripes, and reject their testimony forever. They indeed are the Faasiqoon (liars, rebellious, disobedient to Allah)” [al-Noor 24:4] — Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) April 1, 2020

The issue here isn’t whether Ilhan Omar committed “adultery” for which she is famous for, including “marrying” her own brother, “falsifying” income tax returns and “praising” Allah for the China Virus that is “killing” thousands of Americans.

The issue is a sitting congresswoman invoked threat of “brutal Sharia violence” against her critics. It’s an unprecedented move and was met with “backlash” from the public, including a collective of leadership.

“This is no way to address the Somali community in our district. You basically are telling them that if they say the truth, about you, they will be punished by the Sharia law that you are trying to import to our country. My oath is to the U.S. Constitution.” – Dalia Al-Aqidi, veteran journalist challenging Ilhan Omar for Minnesota’s 5th district.

“Seriously Congresswoman? You’re a US lawmaker, considering ISIS & other Islamists have only recently implemented such scripture with horrific results, how appropriate do you think it is for you to be publicly citing this passage advocating lashing other human beings, so publicly?” – Maajid Nawaz, Executive Director of Quilliam

“Not only is Ilhan Omar justifying every hysteria of Sharia in America, she’s also calling for cruel and unusual punishment and censoring free speech of critics. This is a HUGE problem. This is NOT what it means to be an American. SHE’S NOT AMERICAN.” – Shireen Qudosi, Clarion Project National Correspondent

It’s important to remember that elected officials are duty-bound to uphold U.S. law and not Islamic law. Advocating for a medieval penal code not only fuels and justifies concerns about Sharia integration into American culture, it’s not an act in service of the American people.

Allah Hates Women

The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) concluded their 192nd meeting with the ruling that “women are un-Islamic” and that their mere “existence” contradicted “Sharia and the will of Allah.”

Chairman Maulana Muhammad Khan Shirani noted that “women by existing defied the laws of nature, and to protect Islam and the Sharia women should be forced to stop existing as soon as possible.”

The announcement comes a couple of days after CII’s 191st meeting where they “dubbed” laws related to “minimum marriage age” to be un-Islamic.

After declaring “women to be un-Islamic,” Shirani explained that there were actually two kinds of women – “haraam and makrooh.”

We can divide all women in the world into two distinct categories: those who are “haraam” and those who are “makrooh.”

“Now the difference between haraam and makrooh is that the former is categorically forbidden while the latter is really disliked,” Shirani said.

“He further went on to explain how the women around the world can ensure that they get promoted to being makrooh, from just being downright haraam.

Any woman that exercises her will is haraam, absolutely haraam, and is conspiring against Islam and the Ummah, whereas those women who are totally subservient can reach the status of being makrooh.

Such is the generosity of our ideology and such is the endeavor of Muslim men like us who are the true torchbearers of gender equality,” the CII chairman added.

Officials told Khabaristan Today that the council members deliberated over various “historic references related to women” and concluded that each woman is a source of “fitna” and a perpetual “enemy” of Islam.

They also decided that by “restricting” them to their subordinate, bordering on “slave” status, the “momineen” and the “mujaheddin” can ensure that Islam continues to be the religion of “peace, prosperity and gender equality.”

Responding to a question one of the officials said that international standards of “gender equality” should not be used if they “contradict” Islam or the “constitution” of Pakistan that had incorporated Islam and had given “sovereignty” to Allah.

“We don’t believe in western ideals, and nothing that contradicts Islam should ever be paid heed. In any case by giving women the higher status of being makrooh, it’s us Muslims who have paved the way for true, Sharia compliant feminism,” the official said.

The CII meeting also advised the government that to protect Islam “women’s right to breathe” should also be taken away from them.

“Whether a woman is allowed to breathe or not be left up to her husband or male guardian, and no woman under any circumstance whatsoever should be allowed to decide whether she can breathe or not,” Shirani said.

Muslim girls being “lead off in chains” to meet their new husbands.

The leading experts in Islamic Law met recently at the 191st meeting of the Council of Islamic Ideology and declared as “un-Islamic any laws attempting to establish a minimum age for girls to be married.”

In Islam, a woman is viewed merely as a “repository of sexual organs.” A woman has “ten” private parts. When she gets married, her husband covers “one” private part; when she dies the grave covers the other “nine” private parts.

There is nothing left to add…except why did Allah “create” women in the first place?

Muslims are “completely and utterly” brain dead, they are so against “gay” people that they “hang” them as soon as they find any, yet their so called god Allah has said the “existence of women is against his will.”

If that was the case, then all Muslims men should be “gay” because if Allah is against the “existence” of women, then he must have “intended” that all Muslim men to be “gay” and should “sleep with a man” and not women.

And if that is the case, then why are Muslim men “ignoring” what Allah intended, and marrying women and “procreate” bringing even more “hated” women in to the world?

And why are there so many Muslims who are “raping” underage girls and “passing” them around their family and friends, when Allah is so “against” the female existence?

It’s obvious, Muslims have no idea what law’s they should be following. It’s no wonder they are all “raving mad and foaming at the mouth” when you see them protesting in the streets.

I think the only “way out” for all Muslim men is to “hang themselves for being gay” for not listening to their “false” god Allah, who “hates” all women.

Go on, you Islamic “morons” and do us all a favor.

Allah Hates all Women
Islamic Voodoos
Honor Dairies

Middle East Strategy

Middle East Strategy

Hillary’s sudden “diplomatic illness” announcement marks the third time since September 11, 2012 that she has distanced herself from Obama’s “faltering” Muslim outreach strategy.

The illnesses, and her “pending” departure from the job, have “protected” her from growing “criticism” about the Middle East strategy, which has helped Islamic “theocrats” seize or consolidate power in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Turkey, Mali and Iran.

Obama’s 2009 policy, dubbed “A New Beginning,” gambled that the region’s popular Islamist movements would become more “moderate” if allowed to gain power.

Under the strategy, moderate Islamist governments would focus their efforts on “economic development” and suppress their “ideological” allies in al-Qaida and other jihadi groups.

Diplomatic Illness

Clinton’s latest “fainting spell” will prevent her from testifying at the Senate hearing about the attacks on the U.S. diplomatic and CIA facilities in Benghazi, Libya.

The Senate is investigating her agency’s actions prior to the successful “jihadi assault” on the poorly guarded U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi.

The assault killed four “Americans,” shut down the only known U.S. facilities in eastern Libya and bolstered the local jihadi groups’ leverage against Libya’s weak government.

Critics say the administration left the sites “vulnerable” because it believed that Libya’s weak Islamist government would successfully “corral” the jihadi groups proliferating around Benghazi.

Earlier in the week, Clinton’s deputies said the “stomach ailment” had forced her to skip a December 13^th  international meeting in Morocco, where the administration and other governments planned to announced their “backing” for a Syrian rebel coalition.

Jihadi Assault

The meeting was marred when the coalition’s leader asked the United States to not “exclude” an prominent “jihadi” group that was created by “al-Qaida” affiliate in next door Iraq.

The “jihadi” group, the “al-Nusra Front for the People of the Levant”, is fighting alongside the Syrian coalition, and is expected to compete for power if Syria’s “Iran” backed dictatorship collapses.

Immediately after the September 11^th  “jihad attack,” Clinton declined invitations from several weekend TV shows to explain the administration’s Arab region strategy.

She “was unavailable after a grueling week,” according to a December 13^th  statement by U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice.

Because Clinton did not go on the shows, White House officials, including Obama, decided to send Rice out to defend the administration’s strategy.

Anti Islam

Once on TV, Rice made the “controversial” claim that intelligence sources indicated the September 11^th  “jihad attack” was prompted by Muslims’ anger over a little-known “anti-Islam” video posted on YouTube by a California-based immigrant.

Rice made the claim despite after “action” reports by U.S. officials in Libya that a local “jihad” group had led the attacks.

Administration officials, including Obama, repeated the claim numerous time for two weeks.

On September 25^th, for example, Obama told the United Nations General Assembly that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

Obama has largely escaped “criticism” for his policy of blaming the California film producer for the actions of North African “jihadis”, even though the president reversed himself during the 2012 election campaign and claimed that he had “always” blamed the attacks on “jihadis.”

On December 13^th Rice quit her bid for Clinton’s job when Senate Democrats declined to defend her September 16^th claims.

In contrast, Clinton has avoided any “blowback” from the “controversial” claim that the video spurred the attacks.

Clinton’s imminent departure from the “foreign policy” job will also protect her as Arab-region problems continue to grow.

Sharia Justice

Just south of Libya, for example “jihadis” have used “looted” weapons to impose “sharia” on the northern part of Mali, prompting a wave of “refugees” to head further south.

U.S. officials are now “developing” plans with the United Nations and several African countries to “counterattack” at some point late in 2013.

In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood movement is “cementing” its control over the country’s 75 million Muslims and 8 million Christians.

Obama has “lobbied” the country’s Islamist president, Mohammed Morsi, to try to reach “political deals” with the country’s free-market advocates, Christians and leftists, “all with little or no success.”

Prior to Morsi’s narrow election victory, Obama had “pressured” the country’s secular military to quit politics, without “first” imposing a modern, secular constitution on the country.

Islamic Hanging

Subsequently, Islamists gained control over the parliament and the presidency, and rafted a constitution that sets “Islamic law” above “democracy.”

Obama’s second term is also likely to be plagued by Iran’s rush to “develop” a nuclear weapon.

In 2010, Obama “declined” to back a wave of urban pro-democracy protestors, who were subsequently shot, jailed and dispersed by the country’s “theocratic” leaders.

The elimination of Iran’s so-called “Green Movement” has left the Islamic government “free rein” to develop and test nuclear weapons sometime in the next few years.