Women Under Sharia

Women Under Sharia
By Aynaz Anni Cyrus

Fourteen years ago my life changed forever as I arrived in the United States, holding tightly to hope and a promise.

That promise was freedom and a dream of a better life.

I entered this beautiful country as a documented immigrant at the age of 18 in August 2002, almost one year after 9/11. After surviving 15 years of oppression under Sharia in Iran, I felt older than my years. I had seen too much and I knew all too well the suffering of those who were subjected to Islam. What I had witnessed and experienced had left my soul weary. But in America, I felt safe. I was able to breathe, and I could stop looking over my shoulder and living in fear.

I could now believe in miracles. Here I was, the newest member of the greatest country in the world. It was my rebirth into freedom. I was in a new place that viewed me as a human; someone of value to society. Finally, my life mattered. I was a daughter of liberty; a citizen of the U.S.A.

I’ve never forgotten those who I left behind — and I have dedicated my life to them. How could I turn my back on them, when I know all too well the vicious suffering women endure in Islamic-ruled countries?

At the age of 9, Qur’anic teachings and Islamic traditions forced me into womanhood. My thoughts, my actions and my life were no longer my own. From that moment on, I lost all rights as a person, as my instruction in preparation to marry and bear children became my only purpose in life. No longer would I be allowed in public without my hijab; prayer and submission would dominate my days. The life of a carefree child at play came to an abrupt and sudden end.

For the next 9 years, I would suffer terrible cruelty under Islam. Rape, lashings, arrests and beatings were my life because I was regarded as property to be “handled” rather than a human being to be loved. During those nine years, I was sold into marriage to a much older man who abused me terribly. A bruised body and broken bones became a common reality for me, and there was little I could do to stop it. Divorce was not an option. Islamic law offers women little support in abusive marriages.

I was trapped, like so many other young girls and women around me were. My silent screams of desperation would remain unheard — until the day I decided I would rather die escaping than continue to live my life as a slave.

Fourteen years have now passed since I gained my freedom and began my mission to help and liberate those still trapped in Islamic countries. I do my best to be a voice for the voiceless who are still living a nightmare under the tyrannical rule of Islam.

I also fight for my fellow Americans. The present danger that Islam poses to this nation is very real, despite what our leftist government and media would have you believe. And because of the willful blindness and corruption within our government and media, America is now in grave danger vis-à-vis Islamic Supremacism and Jihad. I am witness to the hidden war between Islam and the West, and I see clearly, with great sadness and fear, that we are losing.

There are those voices amongst us that argue that Sharia is compatible with American life and can coexist harmoniously alongside the U.S. Constitution. Sorry, but I know Sharia. I know Islam. The coexistence of Sharia with the U.S. Constitution is impossible. And it is crucial to crystallize this fact and to expose exactly what Sharia is because it is now making significant gains on our territory.

Sharia severely limits individual rights, and every country ruled by Sharia forces its citizens to adhere to a strict code of living in accordance with the Qur’an, Hadith and the Supreme leader’s ruling. The concept of free speech, for instance, is anathema to Islam. So is the notion of the individual. In Islam, it is “Allah” who dictates and defines the limits on acceptable and unacceptable actions. In Islam, it is the Qur’an that dictates the lives of the believers, and they have no freedom of choice in regard to anything they do.

Sharia denies its followers basic human dignity. In Islamic countries, women are second-class citizens, mere property, and denied many of the rights Americans take for granted. The right to initiate divorce, travel alone, or own property unless permitted by a man is denied to a woman in Islam.

Submission of the individual is also evident in Islam’s denial of freedom of religion. Under Sharia, you must practice Islam. Anyone born in an Islamic country is, by law, a Muslim, regardless of heritage. Attempting to change your faith is punishable by death.

In my homeland, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Sharia is the law of the land. To speak out against it has dire consequences. Because of Sharia, Iran has one of the highest number of executions in the world. Reports and evidence of crimes against humanity come out of the Islamic Republic daily, many from released prisoners and their families. Patterns of torture, abuse and death of political prisoners are an undeniable truth.

I am saying all of this because today, as I look at what is happening in America, I see our freedom gravely threatened. Islam is at war with us, and it will stop at nothing in its deliberate and sustained attack on our freedoms. Islamization of the West is occurring at a very fast pace and one of the vehicles Supremacists are using to achieve it is the flooding of Western countries with Muslim refugees. Islamic Obama has opened the floodgates and Hillary intends to escalate the process.

Our leadership and media, meanwhile, perpetrate the lie that accepting these refugees is somehow about tolerance. It is not about tolerance — it is about our values being exploited by our enemies to assist us in cultural suicide and leaving ourselves vulnerable to jihadist attacks.

The dire danger to America lies in the lies told by our leftist government and media and the ignorance of many Americans about Islam’s true character and purpose. I fear that Americans have become blind to how precious and rare freedom is and how it must be protected and fought for without pause. I can’t help but fear that what is coming to America is what came to my homeland in 1979 — and I refuse to be silenced again. And because I refuse to be silent today, I know that certain Islamic forces have targeted me. But I will continue to speak out.

I tell you these things not to gain your sympathy, but to help you understand that our freedom is under fire. Our country is headed down a very dangerous path. The Left has succeeded in making resistance to Islamization appear to be racism and hatred. We must fight this malicious lie. We must fight to become well-informed and educated about Islam in order to defeat leftist and Islamist propaganda. By remaining silent, being afraid to be called names and ignoring reality, we will be surrendering our freedoms to the enemy.

Time is short. Every day that passes is one day we cannot spare. My hope for freedom and a better life was realized when I stepped on American soil fourteen years ago. But what frightens me is that the pernicious evil I escaped from is now coming here. I see it with my own eyes – and, catastrophically, this nation is sleepwalking like a zombie into disaster. I will not allow my freedom to be taken away again without fighting till my last breath. I hope my fellow Americans who love their country as much as I do will join me and other freedom fighters in our battle to save it.

Aynaz “Anni” Cyrus is a 32-year-old Iranian-born woman who “rejected” Islam and “fled” Iran to America in her teens. She came to the United States after years of “persecution, torture, and imprisonment.” Now she works to “protect and defend” the rights of women and girls under the oppression of “Sharia Law” and fights to raise “awareness” through informative videos, radio interviews, blog posts and on her “Live Up To Freedom” website.

She’ll tell her story of life in an “Islamic gulag” and what life is like for women under Sharia Law. We also discuss what the Qur’an “really” says about women and the “claim” that Islam is a religion of peace. Later, Annie shares her view on western “feminists and liberals” who are welcoming Islam and so called “refugees” into western nations. She’ll also tell why she “supports” Trump.

She is the producer of The Glazov Gang and hosts its feature, The Unknown.

Letter to Donald Trump
It takes one to know one

Advertisements

#TryBeatingMeLightly

The “Council of Islamic Ideology” (CII), Pakistan’s 20-member constitutional “ruling” body, recently proposed a “bill” recommending that men bestow a “light beating” onto their defiant wives, and “prohibiting” mixing of the genders in “schools, hospitals and offices.”

The proposal also suggests “interacting with strangers, not wearing a hijab, and speaking too loudly, giving others cash without her husband’s permission,” among other potential activities that might incur a “light beating.”

“A husband should be allowed to lightly beat his wife if she defies his commands and refuses to dress up as per his desires; turns down demand of intercourse without any religious excuse or does not take bath after intercourse or menstrual periods,” the CII bill says, according to Pakistan’s Express-Tribune newspaper.

Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) chairman Maulana Muhammad Khan Sherani addresses a press conference in Islamabad on May 26, 2016.

CII chairman Muhammad Kahn Sherani said: “If you want her to mend her ways, you should first advise her … If she refuses, stop talking to her … then stop sharing a bed with her… and if things do not change, get a bit strict.”

A “bit strict,” he clarified, would include “hitting her with light things like handkerchief, a hat or a turban, but do not hit her on the face or private parts” to instill fear.

The CII’s proposed bill “claims” women will have all the “rights” given to them under “Sharia” law, but prohibits “interaction between unmarriageable kin” (na-mehrams) at recreational spots and offices, and bans “dance, music, and sculptures created in the name of art.”

According to the Washington Post, CII’s proposal “would ban women from appearing in television or print advertising and would prohibit female nurses from treating male patients. It also would give a husband permission to forbid his wife from visiting males other than relatives.”

It also suggests “bans” on various other activities, including women “fighting” in wars. But it allows women to “participate” in politics and become “judges,” and proposes that the “need” for a guardian for “women of age” is not required.

The proposal also says that women should not be “permitted” to receive non-relatives or foreign officials, and they should not use “birth control pills without asking their husbands.”

Proposals by the “Council of Islamic Ideology” are recommendations and are not “applicable” unless passed by legislators.

Earlier this year, the Punjab Assembly, Pakistan’s most populated province, passed a women’s protection bill, granting protection from “abusive” husbands which the CII and religious parties strongly rejected, declaring it “unIslamic.”

The “Khyber Pakhtunkhwa” (KP) government sent a “similar” bill to the Council for review, which also was “rejected” on the basis of being “unIslamic”, and announced it will prepare a “model” bill in response.

The council’s “draft proposal” has met with a “furious” response in Pakistan, including “calls” for the CII to be “disbanded.”

The “Council of Islamic Ideology” is a 54-year-old “advisory” body made up of Islamic “clerics and scholars” responsible for offering “legal” advice to Pakistani “legislators” whether laws are in line with the “teachings of Islam.”

Although CII is part of Pakistan’s governmental “structure,” and provides constitutional “recommendations” to parliament regarding “Islamic” laws, its 163-page proposal is “non-binding” and does not have to be “voted” on by the Pakistani parliament.

Copies of the proposed “163-point bill” have been sent to all provincial “assemblies” at the CII’s recommendations.

Salient points from the proposed bill address “property, marriage, motherhood, crimes, violence against women, apostasy,” and even venture into the instruments of “state acceptable” for a woman to be involved in.

Farzana Bari, “human rights activist” and academic at “Quaid-i-Azam University,” termed the proposed bill “unconstitutional.”

“Allowing a husband to beat his wife, in any way, is against Pakistan’s Constitution and the international laws and treaties that Pakistan has signed and is bound by. This Council is a burden on the Pakistani taxpayer and bringing a bad name to Muslims throughout the world.”

“Not allowing adult women to work and keeping them at home is to treat them like children or property,” she added. “This will take Pakistan further into ignorance.”

Key proposals in the bill
Property
Women will have the right to own property
Women have the right to bequeath property
Marriage
A husband may, when needed, lightly beat his wife
Three consecutive declarations of divorce will be punishable (punishment unspecified)
A guardian’s permission is not required for a woman who has reached maturity to contract a nikah
A wife has the right to khula if she forfeits alimony
A wife may move the court in case of ‘excesses’ by husband
Contracting a marriage for Vani or dispute resolution is punishable (punishment unspecified)
Contracting a woman’s marriage to a Qur’an will be a crime carrying a ten-year sentence
Ban on the request and display of dowry
State
Women will be permitted to participate in politics
Women are not responsible for participation in combat missions
It is forbidden to kill a woman in war
Women may become judges
Women will not be permitted to receive foreign officials and state guests
Religion
Forcing any woman to convert carries a three-year prison sentence
A woman cannot be killed/executed for ‘leaving Islam’
A woman of sound mind is permitted to convert to Islam
Crime
Acid attacks and violent acts against women such as throwing acid on women should be thoroughly investigated
Ban on honor killing, Karo kari, and siyah kari
Work and education
Ban on co-education past the primary level
Co-education past the primary level may be permitted if hijab is made mandatory and free mixing between the genders is not allowed
A ban on women working in ‘vulgar’ advertisements
Female nurses should not attend to male patients
Women should not be forced into difficult, ‘labor-intensive’ work
Motherhood
Mothers must breastfeed for two years
Ban on advertisements baby formula/substitutes for breast milk
A woman cannot use contraception without the husband’s permission
An abortion after 120 days will be classified as murder

Indeed, “violence” against women in The Islamic Republic of Pakistan is “rampant.”

The independent “Human Rights Commission” of Pakistan’s annual report revealed hundreds of “gang rapes, kidnappings, and burnings” and said more than 800 women had committed “suicide” or attempted to.

A Saudi Arabian Family “hung” their Ethiopian maid “upside” down from a hook and “brutally” beat her to a “bloody” pulp. She is “drenched” in blood from the “whips and sticks” that the Saudi men used to “beat” her.

http://www.liveleak.com/ll_embed?f=48c3e0dd5d9f

Non-European Foreign workers in the Gulf states are treated as DE-facto “slaves with no human rights” and are kept as virtual “prisoners” by their respective “employers” and forced to endure “harsh treatment” for little pay.

A recent report by “Amnesty International” slammed the worsening state of “human rights abuses” in the country. Among the myriad “criticisms” leveled in the report, it was noted that “migrant” workers and other “minorities” regularly suffer “abuse and excessive use of force” at the hands of authorities.

Ironically, the Islamic law that allows a husband to “lightly beat” his wife is being “sold on the streets” of Toronto and “protested” in Pakistan.

The book distributed in a popular downtown square in Toronto, Canada from an Islamic “da’wah” (outreach) group advocates “wife beating under the right circumstances” and professes that some “women may even enjoy being beaten at times as a sign of love and concern.”

Te book in question, “Women in Islam & Refutation of some Common Misconceptions,” was obtained by Jonathon D. Halevi, who wrote an “expose” about the distribution and content of the book in CIJ News.

Halevi “obtained” the book from a booth advertising “Free Info on Islam” operating in Dundas Square.

He notes that the book, written by Saudi scholar Dr. Abdul-Rahman al-Sheha and printed by the Saudi “da’wah” organization the “Muslim World League,” was also handed out at Central Square of York University by “women students” belonging to the “Muslim Students Association“ (MSA), a “Muslim-Brotherhood” linked organization.

Wife “beating” is viewed as the third and final stage of “discipline” used “to treat a wife blameworthy of immoral behavior,” according to the book, which states “how” it should be done.

“Beating without hurting, breaking a bone, leaving black or blue marks on the body, and avoiding hitting the face or especially sensitive places.”

The book goes on to state that, according to psychologists, this “treatment” has proved to be effective with “two types of women”:

“The first type: Strong willed, demanding and commandeering women. These are the type of women who like to control, master and run the affairs of their husbands by pushing them around, commanding them and giving them orders.”

“The second type: Submissive or subdued women. These women may even enjoy being beaten at times as a sign of love and concern.”

The book compares “wife beating to spanking a recalcitrant child” and as a remedy much like “bitter medicine” which an ill person will “gladly take to be cured of their ailment.”

Meanwhile, in Pakistan, in response to the “Council of Islamic Ideology” (CII) proposal that a husband be allowed to “lightly beat” his wife, a hash tag #TryBeatingMeLightly is trending.

Photographer Fahhad Rajper took photos of 12 Pakistani professional women with their promise of what will happen if “beaten lightly.”

See video below and Rajper’s Facebook page…

What Does Islam Teach About Wife Beating
Wife-Beating in Islam
Hijabs in the Workplace: To Wear or Not to Wear?
Florida Prof Endorses Severing Hands, Blasphemy Laws
Lahore Court Restores Divorce for Christian Couples
Satire Against Extremism is Taking the Web By Storm

Kill Gays and Lesbians

Many “Gay and Lesbian” activists are not aware that under “Islamic Sharia Law” Muslims are allowed to “kill or imprison” homosexuals.

Murdering “homosexuals” is done by many Muslim countries. The more “Moslem” the country is, the more likely that the “death penalty” for a homosexual is a “reality.”

Many celebrities like “Elton John, Ellen DeGeneres, Adam Lambert, Suze Orman, Rosie O’Donnell, Johnny Mathis, Anderson Cooper, K.D. Lang, Boy George, George Michael, Greg Louganis, Michael Kirby, Melissa Etheridge, David Geffen, Chastity Bono” and countless others would be in “prison or facing murder” and it would not be a “hate” crime in the Middle East to “kill” a gay person.

Many people in the West do not know the “true nature” of Islam and believe “Sharia Law” is a good thing.

Some “Liberal and Leftists” stick up for Islam without “knowing” anything about it, which includes “murdering and harassing” Gay and Lesbians.

Here is a “interview” of a Muslim at a Washington D.C. function called “Muslim Day” where Moslem’s are allowed to “pray” on the White “Rainbow” House lawn.

Here is a Muslim “scholar” from Florida preaching “killing gays is the compassionate thing to do.”

“The only way gays and lesbians can be forgiven is to die,” says this imam, voicing what most Muslims “believe but rarely say in public.”

Not to worry, the Obama administration will “ignore” this while continuing to “harass” and “put out of business” Christian bakeries that “refuse” to make Gay “wedding” cakes.

Islam and Homosexuality
The Islamic State Throws More Gays Off the Roof

ISIS Warning

This is the new “Map of Europe” released by the “Islamic State’s” (ISIS) multi-billion dollar “war” machine, better known as the “JV team,” drawn-up to show the areas it plans to “dominate” in the next five years.

The “chilling” image highlights areas the brutal “terror” organization plans to seize by 2020, including “Spain, China” and parts of “North Africa.”

According to the map, ISIS plan to take “control” of the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Europe, within the next “five” years, to complete its “caliphate.”

The caliphate, a state governed by “Sharia law” which ISIS plan to “claim,” covers areas from “Spain in the west to China in the east.”

“Andalus” is the Arabic name given to the parts of “Spain, Portugal and France” that were occupied by the “Moors” between the eighth and the 15th century.

The “savage” terror organization has up to 50,000 “members” and nearly £2billion of “cash and assets.”

BBC reporter Andrew Hosken, who includes the map of the “targeted” areas in his new book, said ISIS wants “to take over all of what they see as the Islamic world.”

He said: “Once they have their caliphate, they plan to turn against the rest of the world. They envisage the whole world being under their rule.”

“They have 60 nations against them, including the United States and Russia, so one would think that is pretty unlikely.”

“But one would have thought the first steps were unlikely as well.”

Hosken said the brutal organization sees “us as being under their rule too and having to abide by their ideology”.

“They have already destabilized Iraq and Syria, they have tried to destabilize Saudi Arabia and Libya and recently they almost destroyed Tunisia’s main industry, tourism.”

Hosken claims that the longer ISIS “remains” in Iraq and Syria, the more “likely” it is they will develop “biological and chemical” weapons.

He said: “If they had weapons of mass destruction, they would use them. There is no question about that.”

The author reveals how in 1996 Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who founded the “depraved” terror group which eventually became “ISIS,” described a “seven-step program” that would lead the organization to “victory” by 2020.

Hosken said: “We were so close to destroying them back in 2010-11. 80% of their leaders had been captured or killed and they ended up as a little rump.”

“We didn’t finish them off and like a cancer they came back. “

David Cameron has given the green light to a lengthy “air strike campaign” to suppress the terrorist’s savage “advances,” but he is facing increasing pressure to send “ground forces” into Iraq and Syria to “tackle” the organization.

But Hosken warns that al-Zarqawi’s seven-stage plan suggests ISIS “would very much like it if we invaded,”  claiming it would be the perfect “recruitment drive” for the terror group.

He said: “There is a danger it would be a rallying cry to Muslims around the world to come and a join them. Islamic State want to be seen to be fighting the West.”

“They think a lot of Muslims around the world would then see that as Muslims under attack and would join Islamic State.”

“The name of their magazine is Dabiq, which is a town in Syria where their Armageddon, the final battle between them and the West, takes place.”

It emerged yesterday that the “brutal” organization is plotting to “blow up” the Queen on British soil at an “event” marking the end of the “Second World War.”

Police and MI5 are said to be desperately “racing against the clock” to foil the assassination “plot” by British “jihadis,” which is being “masterminded” from Syria by ISIS commanders.

The terrorists are reportedly looking to “strike” by detonating a pressure cooker “bomb” in Central London during events marking the 70th anniversary of “Victory in Japan” day, which effectively “ended” World War Two.

ISIS has “gained” notoriety for its sickening “tactics” its fighters have employed as they “rampage” through Iraq and Syria.

“So it could be a bit of an elephant trap.”

Last week the organization “slaughtered” more than 2,000 people in an act condemned as a “crime of genocide.”

The group are said to have carried out the brutal killings “in cold blood” for petty crimes including common theft.

They also “executed” 19 women hostages who would not have “sex” with fighters claiming the women had “refused” to participate in the practice of “sexual jihad.”

Kurdish Democratic Party spokesman Said Mimousini said: “ISIS executed 19 women in the city of Mosul during the past two days. The penalty decision came on the background of the refusal to participate in the practice of sexual jihad.”

Islamic State Facts Every American Must Know

Gay Caning

A harsh law that makes “gay” sex punishable by public “caning” has been re-introduced in the conservative Aceh province in Indonesia “outlawing” it for local men, women, Muslims and non-Muslims, foreign nationals and tourists.

The “inhumane” law stipulates that anyone caught having “homosexual” sex can face up to 100 “strokes” of a cane, a fine of up to 1 kilogram (2.2 pounds) of “gold” worth about $37,400 and “imprisonment” of up to 100 months.

Under the new laws, “adultery” also carries a possible “penalty” of 100 strokes. Those who “accuse” someone of adultery without “proof” could themselves “face” 80 lashes.

“The law is to safeguard human dignity. It is to protect Aceh’s Muslims from committing immoral acts,” provincial Sharia chief Syahrizal Abbas told the AFP news agency.

Aceh is the “only” province in Indonesia which “enforces” Islamic Sharia law and has “autonomous” control over “crime and punishment.”

The “law,” passed in 2014 but only “now” being enforced, has faced “stiff “opposition by human rights groups.

Richard Bennett, Amnesty International’s Asia Pacific director, said in a statement: “This law will only add to the climate of homophobia, fear and harassment many in Aceh are already facing.”

“Laws that criminalize sex outside marriage are used disproportionately by police and punish women’s choices. They also act as a deterrent to women reporting rape and sexual violence who may fear being accused of sex outside marriage.”

Canings often happen in public and draws large crowds.

According to Amnesty, at least 156 people have been “caned” in Aceh since 2010 for various “unrelated” offenses, including “gambling, selling food during the Ramadan, and drinking alcohol.”

Bennett added: “Caning is a cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment that is clearly prohibited under international law.”

Human rights groups have “criticized” the law, saying it “violates” international treaties signed by Indonesia protecting the “rights” of minorities.

“It does not violate human rights. It instead raises the dignity of human beings,” Abbas said.

“There is nothing to be worried about with the enactment of the law,” said Syahrizal Abbas, chief of the Islamic Shariah. “This becomes the umbrella for the upholding of Islamic law.”

The law “applies” to all Muslims.

Non-Muslims, who “account” for about 1 percent of the province’s population, can “choose” whether they wish to follow the “provincial” law or the national “criminal” code, Abbas said.

An Acehnese man convicted for “immoral acts” is lashed by a hooded local government officer during a public caning at a square in Banda, Aceh province,

But Ismail Hasani, from human rights group “Setara Institute for Democracy and Peace,” criticized the law as “cruel, inhumane and against the constitution” since gay sex is not “illegal” in the rest of Indonesia.

Indonesia’s secular central government “granted” Aceh the right to implement Islamic “Shariah” law in 2006 as part of a “peace” deal to end a “separatist” war.

A “religious” police and court system has been “established” and the new law is a significant “strengthening” of Shariah in the region.

People “convicted” of gambling and consuming alcohol already face “caning,” as do women who wear “tight” clothes and people who “skip” Friday Muslim prayers.

The attackers demanded that churches that they said lacked permits be torn down.

The province has recently seen a “deterioration” in relations between the “Muslim” majority and smaller religious groups such as “Christians.”

Churches have been “destroyed” in violent protests in recent weeks or have been “demolished” by local authorities who said they “lacked” proper permits.

Police warned Christians of possible Islamic attacks during Christmas and New Year.

Indonesia’s national “criminal” code doesn’t regulate “homosexuality,” and the central government doesn’t have the “power” to strike down provincial laws.

However, an earlier “version” of the law that called for people to be “stoned” to death for adultery was dropped because of “pressure” from the central government.

The sign reads: “If you date on the beach, the risk is on your own” – a warning against romantic relationships outside marriage.

NEW #IslamicState blockbuster film “coming” out soon! Watch in every #ISIS cinema! #Khilafa – where true “romance” blooms!

Caning: Corporal Punishment
Gays and Muslim Refugees
Do gays getting caned in Indonesia suffer from Islamophobia?

Rainbow Houses

In a landmark 5-4 “decision” in Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health et al., the United States Supreme Court “ruled” that all Americans, regardless of “sexual” orientation, have the “constitutional right” to marry, but limited the “scope” of its decision to only Americans with something to “offer” a partner.

Writing for the majority, Justice Kennedy noted that “by virtue of their exclusion from the institution of marriage, same-sex couples are denied the constellation of benefits that the States have linked to marriage.”

The court concluded that “…the right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of the person, and under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment couples of the same-sex may not be deprived of that right and that liberty.”

However, we make clear that this “opinion” does not award any “rights, liberties, dignity or benefits” of any kind to lonely “single” people that have probably never even had a “girlfriend.”

In “commemoration” of the Supreme Court’s ruling to “legalize” same-sex marriage the “Rainbow House” lit up in colors.

With this “fabulous” move, the building formerly known a the “White House” has been made into a display of “punitive” acceptance and “mandatory” tolerance and “made our union a little more perfect” according to President Obama.

Upcoming “renovations” are planned to include “multi-gender” restrooms, replacing the white man’s “bowling” alley with a Caligula-class “steam bath and hot-tub” complex, renaming the first family’s living rooms “Reggie’s Nest,” and the Lincoln Bedroom after “Sandra Fluke.”

The newly colored “Rainbow House” and both houses of Congress are in “progress” of becoming true metaphorical “gay” houses.

Besides tearing “down” the Jefferson Memorial, future plans call for the repainting the “Rotunda” in rainbow shades of color and the “removal” of all those paintings of white men as “penance” for over 200 years of evil “white” male hegemony, many of which were “slave” owners.

Obama recently said no longer must my “Rainbow House” be a symbolic monument to old “white” men with “powdered” wigs, former “slave” owners and purveyors of “genocide” of indigenous people. It must become a monument to “defeat” those right-wingers who stole an “election” and continuously try to “undermine” progress.

After the Supreme Court “unilaterally” made gay marriage the “law” of the land, Obama made a statement from the “Rainbow House” that included this lie:

“I know that Americans of good will continue to hold a wide range of views on this issue. Opposition, in some cases, has been based on sincere and deeply held beliefs. All of us who welcome today’s news should be mindful of that fact and recognize different viewpoints, revere our deep commitment to religious freedom.”

In other words, “If you like your religion, you can keep your religion.”

This statement from our president is no “truer” than his lie during the “ObamaCare” debate about being able to keep your “doctor and insurance.”

Obama knew he was lying then. Obama knows he is lying now about “protecting” religious freedom.

Legalizing “same sex marriage” is not the endgame for the Left, it is in fact the “creation” of a weapon that will now be used to “marginalize, punish, terrorize, and decimate” the Christian religion, its practitioners, and the Church itself.

The small business owners and CEO’s already targeted for extinction by the Left are just the beginning.

Churches that “refuse” to perform same sex weddings will not only be relentlessly shamed as “bigots” by the left and their allies in the mainstream media, their “tax-exempt” status will be also challenged; their ability to perform “public services” will be curtailed or extinguished.

‘The media is smoothing this “jihad,” but it is already happening.

Obviously, the government will take “religion’s” place. Obama can sing “Amazing Grace” but he doesn’t believe a word of it. He is a proven “liar,” and his comments about “respecting” religion are a tactical “move” to get us to take “down” our guard.

Author Brad Thor shared something decidedly “strange” about the Obama administration’s reaction to the landmark ruling on gay marriage, making it legal all across America:

“The only major event the #Obama administration wasn’t caught off guard by and didn’t have to read about in the papers,” Thor wrote.

He likely referred to “instances” when Obama and others have said he and his administration “didn’t know” about major goings on such as “Fast & Furious” and the “IRS” targeting conservatives until “reports” came out in the media.

Here’s a “Supercut” of such instances:

All should be alarmed that a history of slavery exists that is at odds with the “Current Truth.” The constant flux of “revisionist” history is what separates us from the “animal” kingdom.

As we all “celebrate” the passages of marriage rights for the LGBTFQAPBCU©, we must continue the “progression” to other marriages and rights.

We cannot stop at LGBTFQAPBCU© because that is not progression. These are the days where “everyone” can be “anything” and marry “anyone” they like.

From “animals and plants” to just about anything, marriage is a “privilege and a right” that the government lends out to all persons.

Last, but not least, we must find “equal” rights also for “pedophilia, bestiality, polygamy and incest.”

I am sure “Rainbow Warrior” Obama is still figuring that out.

SCOTUS Says Same-Sex Marriage Is a Constitutional Right
SCOTUS Declares Itself God, Redefines Marriage and Rights
Obama Admin Flaunts Rainbow White House After Same-Sex Marriage Ruling
Obama On Gay Marriage: ‘If You Like Your Religion, You Can Keep Your Religion’
The Gay Pride House is Obama’s house
Valerie Jarrett Turned Rainbow House Gay

Allah’s Rules and Hodud

ISIS distributed a circular clarifying “Allah’s rules and Hodud” in a mosque in al- Raqqa City.

“Hodud” refers to the Islamic “punishments” carried out against someone who commit a “deadly” sins.

The circular states “Islamic State believes in Allah almighty, who revealed the Qur’an, and denies the United Nations which fights Allah, and due to we disbelieve of the rules legislated by human beings we promise Allah almighty to carry out his Sharia Law on his land among his worshipers even though the Unbelievers may detest it.”

The circular continues “We clarify Allah’s Hodud” for people by mentioning the “sin” and its “punishment” as follows:

The punishment of insulting Allah is the death.
The punishment of insulting the prophet is the death even though the person repent.
The punishment of insulting Islam is the death.
The punishment of adultery is to stone the married person to death and to whip the single person 100 whips and exile for 1 year.
The punishment of sodomy is to kill both men who do this sin.
The punishment of thievery is to cut the person’s hand.
The punishment of drinking alcoholic is the whip of 80 whips.
The punishment of accusing somebody of adultery is the whip of 80 whips.
The punishment of spying for the sake of unbelievers is the killing.
The punishment of apostasy is the death.
The punishment of banditry is the killing and crucifying if the person kill and take money, if he kill somebody he will be killed in turn, if he take money’s people his right hand and his left leg will be cut and the person who panic people will be exiled.

“We make people fear of Allah and call them to win Allah’s mercy by obeying his order and keep away from his prohibitions, where the real warfare in doing this. Therefore, the ruler who does not carry out Allah’s Sharia has no goodness. We are not going to tolerate in carrying out this great purpose, where IS has sacrificed hundreds its righteous sons, and it even carry out Allah’s law on its own members like killing some of them.”

Punishment for being gay.

Punishment for stealing.

Punishment for adultery by stoning.