Archive for sexism

Hospital Bans Racists

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on March 8, 2020 by andelino

For nearly 60 years, Great Britain has been “idolized” by progressives for its “cultural” contributions, spanning the mid-1960’s British musical invasion to present-day “woke” attitudes that dominate Oxford and Cambridge Universities. Now the NHS — British “National Health Service” — has unwittingly bestowed the gift of a “canary in the coal mine” to conservatives, if only our ears are attuned to its song.

A disturbing article that first appeared in “Russia Today” (RT) on November 7 has been picked up by other news outlets. The essence of the piece is that the NHS is instituting policies to ensure that the “political and social” views of captive patients will now be ongoingly “evaluated and punished” as deemed necessary.

Patients who direct “racist or sexist” abuse at hospital staff could have their treatment withdrawn — as soon as is medically safe — under a new “disciplinary” system which would see “red cards” handed out to repeat offenders. The “Red Racism Card“ scheme was recently implemented by the NHS’s North Bristol Trust (NBT) in response to increasing incidents of “racist” behavior from patients toward medical professionals.

But the proposal has “triggered” mixed reactions. “A message that there’s zero tolerance towards racism will lead to a level of self-control,” Weyman Bennett, co-convenor of the “Stand up to Racism” campaign told RT, adding that, “most of these people will find that once their behavior is deemed unacceptable, they realize that they can no longer behave like that.”   

Stephen Morris, the national secretary for the English Democrats Party, challenged Bennett’s view in the on-air debate, saying that the NHS “is there to treat people” and it should do so “without question.”

Under the scheme, a patient who is “sexist or racially” abusive toward staff would be warned and receive a “yellow card” initially — and if the behavior continues, they would be given a “red card” and have their treatment withdrawn as soon as it is medically safe, NBT chief Andrea Young told the BBC.

The goal is to “challenge and report” incidents of abuse, to send a “strong signal that any racism or discrimination is completely unacceptable” and will be met with consequences, she said.

Trying to monitor “sexism and racism” in this way can “open a massive can of worms,” Morris said, if a patient holds views meaning they don’t want to be treated by a certain type of person.

“Somebody who may have philosophical or religious beliefs about being treated by women or being treated by a certain person, then their philosophical and religious beliefs have to be also respected, and if the NHS are not going to respect their views on that, then they’re going to fall foul of the Equality Act,” he said.

Bennett disagreed, arguing that there is “no reason to respect” the fact that someone simply refuses to be treated by a black person or an Asian person, for instance. 

“Being a racist isn’t a ‘philosophical view,’ it’s just plain wrong,” he said. “People that are racist need to be challenged and it has to be done in such a way that they can simply understand that their behavior is unacceptable,” he added.

The heightened tensions and stress of being in hospital, however, are not “normal circumstances,” Morris said – and even asking someone to just calm down could actually “escalate the situation.”

“What you need to do is make sure you get them treated, get them out, report the behavior and then get them prosecuted if need be afterwards,” he said. “If you start issuing yellow cards and red cards in the hospitals, that’s going to aggravate people more.”

In Bennett’s view it would be “easier for health professionals to give people a warning about their behavior without necessarily bringing in the police and the courts.”

Imagine an elderly WWII-era patient asking a Jamaican nurse “what that funny smell is” if he were to get a whiff of the jerk chicken curry she had for lunch. Is that “racist” and who decides? A betting person might wager that the patient would get a “yellow card” at the very least. If on the following day our theoretical patient were to remark about the attractiveness of her shoes or hairstyle, would a “red card” be in the offing, heralding premature discharge?  Again, who decides?

Think it couldn’t or wouldn’t happen in a U.S., one-size-fits-all “health care gulag” administered by the Deep State?  We’ve seen how an anonymous “whistleblower” peddling secondhand, unsubstantiated “grievances” has been able to create an imbroglio of unprecedented “impeachment” actions for our president and our Constitution.

Imagine if Mark Levin, Tucker Carlson, or Steve Bannon were a patient in a New York City, Boston, or San Francisco hospital, where the majority of the staff reflected surrounding community attitudes and values. Can anyone guarantee that “snowflake health care professionals” inclined toward immediate and perpetual offense would not jump at the chance to misconstrue or even concoct “racist or sexist” umbrage?

Death panels have been warned against and with good reason, but what about “wrong thought panels,” where anonymous reports can dictate that a cancer patient awaiting a bone marrow transplant must be released once stabilized on chemotherapy, back to his home, in what would essentially be a death sentence — all because of real, imagined, or fabricated indignation or even just annoyance?  A grudge against a sexually normative patient by a transgender minority orderly in a fatal form of discrimination can easily be foreseen.

Anyone who has ever dealt with the DMV, the IRS, or the Social Security Administration will be quick to comprehend the terrifying possibilities inside a new health care system where, for all intents and purposes, all recourse and alternatives will have been outlawed.

Cost isn’t everything. Elizabeth Warren’s outlandish $52-trillion price tag for her “Medicare for All” plan has appropriately been the subject of much media coverage.

“The doctor will see you now” might depend instead on factors controlled by those who have their own “tyrannical” agenda.

Why stop at Medicare For All?

Judicial Philosophy vs. Politics

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on December 23, 2019 by andelino

Even though the President of the United States is supposed to “appoint” Supreme Court Justices based on their “judicial philosophy and not their politics”, President Bill Clinton “admitted” that he chose Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg due to her “steadfast” commitment to upholding “abortion.”

Speaking at Georgetown University Law School, the former president said that protecting “Roe v. Wade” played a significant role in his selection of “Ginsburg” to the Supreme Court.

“There is one thing that we did discuss, and I feel I should tell you, because it will illustrate why I thought I should appoint her. Abortion was a big issue in 1992 — the right to choose, I was one of the first pro-choice Democrats to run since Roe v. Wade, who actually benefited from Roe v. Wade. Now, she didn’t have to say anything about this. She knew this perfectly well that I was under a lot of pressure to make sure I appointed someone who is Simon-pure, which I had said was important,” Clinton said, as reported by ABC News.

No president has ever “admitted” to asking a potential Supreme Court nominee on how they would “rule on an issue” like abortion. In fact, when Justice Gorsuch was asked about such a meeting during his confirmation process, he said that would have walked out the door if President Trump pressed him to “overturn” Roe v. Wade.

Former President Clinton said he “inquired” with Ginsburg about the issue of “abortion” and admitted that his pick was “clearly pro-choice” after nominating her.

“I asked her the question and she talked about it just as if it was any other issue, no effect, this is what I think, this is why I think it. And she made a heck of a case,” Clinton said.

Bill Clinton’s frank admission about how he “selected” Ginsburg suggests she may have “lied” during the U.S. Senate confirmation hearing when she said it was “inappropriate for anyone to ask how a judicial nominee would rule on a specific case.”

“It is inappropriate, in my judgment, to seek from any nominee for judicial office assurance on how that individual would rule in a future case. That judgment was shared by those involved in the process of selecting me. No such person discussed with me any specific case, legal issue or question in a manner that could reasonably be interpreted as seeking any express or implied assurances concerning my position on such case, issue, or question,” Ginsburg said.

Ginsburg’s “pro-abortion” record on the Supreme Court is well-documented and often goes beyond “legal” jurisprudence and into “ideological” statements about “sexism and gender politics,” such as when she accused her male peers of “sexism” in the Hobby Lobby ruling.

“Do you believe that the five male justices truly understood the ramifications of their decision?” Katie Couric asked Ginsburg in light of the ruling.

“I would have to say no,” she replied. “But justices continue to think and can change. I am ever hopeful that if the court has a blind spot today, its eyes will be open tomorrow.”

 More proof that “judicial philosophy and politics” go hand in hand despite what they “preach and want you to believe.”

If you wait long enough the “truth” eventually will set you free.

Cenk Uygur’s Sex Rules with Animals

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on December 21, 2019 by andelino

Turkish “Muslim” Cenk Uygur, who wants to “run” for Congress denies the “Armenian Genocide” but wants you to know “Sex with Animals” is just fine with him.

Cenk Uygur, a former MSNBC commentator and founder of “The Young Turks”, a far left activism website, announced his candidacy for the 2020 special election in California’s 25th Congressional district to succeed “lesbian” Katie Hill, who resigned in “disgrace for sexual harassment of her staff.”

Not only does Uygur deny the “Armenian Genocide” in which more than one million Christians were “slaughtered” by the Turkish “Muslim Ottomans”, also known as “The Young Turks”, he also described women as “genetically flawed” because they don’t want to have “sex with him as frequently as he considers desirable.”

Cenk Uygur is a “sick” Muslim and needs to be “exposed” to what he really is.

How in the world do we get such “bestiality” loving Muslim candidates running for United States Congress?

Here is a photo of Cenk Uygur pleasuring his horse mentioned in the above video.

He is likely to be worse than “throupler” Katie Hill who resigned from office. It is too bad that people do not use their “heads” and think about the people they are trying to “vote” into office.

Cenk Uygur is just another filthy, disgusting Turkish “evil” scum who thinks “bestiality” is okay with the “consent” of the animal. He is basically a “communist” backed by “Act Blue”, a Soros-Brock organization.

Uygur has a long history of “sexism, racism and anti-Semitic views.” If people vote for him they can’t be called conservatives. This man is the “spawn of hell.”

Even “Socialist” Bernie Sanders wants to have “nothing to do” with Cenk Uygur and “retracted” his earlier endorsement.

Cenk Uygur Sexists Rules
Armenian Genocide
Armenian Genocide
Bernie Sanders Retracts Endorsement of Young Turks’ Cenk Uygur

What’s In My Pants

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on November 3, 2017 by andelino

In the wake of the Harvey Weinstein firestorm, a video has surfaced showing Jimmy Kimmel, who has been praised by many on the Left as a spokesman for their agenda, and sort of a moral compass, has had his own issues with “sexism,” nowhere near Weinstein’s level of “depravity,” but still decidedly “uncomfortable” to look at in retrospect.

In the video, speaking to a pretty young blonde, Kimmel announces, “I’ve stuffed something in my pants, and you’re welcome to feel around on the outside of the pants. You have then ten seconds to guess what it is in my pants.”

As the blonde starts to “grope his crotch,” Kimmel instructs, “You should use two hands.”

The next shot is of a brunette “groping” Kimmel’s crotch, as he comments, “You’ve done this before, haven’t you.”

Following that, another blonde is on her knees before him, “groping” him, as Kimmel tells her, “Maybe it would be easier if you put your mouth on it.”

The next shot is of Kimmel addressing yet another pretty blonde, asking her, “How old are you?” When she answers, “Eighteen,” he asks, “You sure of that? Cause old Jimmy doesn’t need to do time.”

Back to woman number one, fully “groping” him, as Kimmel quips, “You’re going to make a fine wife.”

Back to woman number two, as Kimmel asks her, “And your guess is?” She replies, “A vibrator?”

Kimmel tells her, “A vibrator?” Then he pulls out an object from his pants, announcing, “No, it is actually a zucchini with a rubber band on it. But you could use it as a vibrator with a rubber band on it. Look,” as he vibrates it in his hand.

The “ever-holy-and-independent-thinking” Jimmy Kimmel also “sexually harasses and objectifies” women. For instance, he made “well-endowed” women jump on trampolines for his and his viewers’ “sexual gratification.”

He once hosted a show called “The Man Show” were he was “implying” that TV should be exclusively for “men and non-inclusive of women and agender-neutral trannies.”

Here are some tidbits about Jimmy Kimmel…

Jimmy Kimmel cares so much about everyone, that he tip-toes past medicine cabinets so he doesn’t wake up any sleeping pills.

How do you keep Jimmy Kimmel busy between tapings? Give him a piece of paper that says “flip” on both sides.

Why does Jimmy Kimmel have to always be reminded to get out of the shower? Because his shampoo bottle says “lather, rinse, repeat.”

Kimmel’s handlers also have to be careful about leaving him with orange juice containers: they say “concentrate,” and he winds up staring at them for hours.

Why did the Jimmy Kimmel get so excited about finishing a jigsaw puzzle in six months? Because the box said it was for “2 to 4 years.”

Jimmy Kimmel’s secret dream is to be Vanna White. No, it’s not an Obama transvestite fantasy: Kimmel wants to actually learn the alphabet.

Speaking of which, Kimmel’s other secret fantasy has actually come true: he finally got a boob job – the only job he’s truly qualified for.

What did Jimmy Kimmel’s wife say when she found out she was pregnant? “I wonder if it’s mine.”

When did Jimmy Kimmel almost drown? When he spotted a scratch and sniff sticker at the bottom of a pool.

Jimmy Kimmel and his wife walked into a building. Neither of them saw it coming.

How do you confuse Jimmy Kimmel? Put him in a circle and tell him to sit in the corner.

Why did Jimmy Kimmel bring a ladder to his first Hollywood party? Whoever invited him told him all the drinks were on the house.

How do you force Jimmy Kimmel to repeat stupid ideas? You don’t have to. He was born that way.

Why did Jimmy Kimmel’s wife put lipstick on her forehead? She was desperately trying to make up her mind.

Why can’t Jimmy Kimmel ever successfully dial 911? He can’t find the eleven.

Why does Jimmy Kimmel always hold his ears? Because he’s desperately trying to hold in an original thought.

Jimmy Kimmel asked his wife why she drew her eyebrows too high. She seemed surprised.

His whole life, Jimmy Kimmel’s parents harassed him to stop acting like a flamingo. He had enough, and finally put his foot down.

Jimmy Kimmel once poured root beer in a square glass. To this day, he can’t understand why he now just has a beer.

A child asked Jimmy Kimmel: What’s the difference between a hippo and a zippo? Kimmel answered: One is really heavy, and the other is a little lighter.

Kimmel and his wife were overheard having an argument. His wife insisted, “Nothing rhymes with orange!”Kimmel was heard saying, “No it doesn’t!”

Arguing his expertise on religion, Kimmel said to a Priest: “So what if I don’t know what Armageddon means? It’s not the end of the world!”

Kimmel and his wife blindfolded themselves and walked into a bar. And a table. And a chair.

Asked why he always carries around a step ladder, Kimmel answered, “I never knew my real ladder.”

The Jimmy Kimmel Show director shouted to Jimmy Kimmel: “I need you to get to the other side of the stage!” Puzzled, Kimmel relied, “I am on the other side!”

Before you criticize Jimmy Kimmel, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, when you do criticize him, you’re a mile away and have his shoes.

How did Kimmel’s wife get him to stop biting his nails? She made him wear shoes.

What did God say after creating Kimmel? I can do so much better.

What does it mean if Kimmel is in your bed gasping for breath and calling your name? You didn’t hold the pillow down long enough.

What do you call a man with half a brain? “Jimmy Kimmel.”

Why does Kimmel whistle when he’s sitting on the toilet? Because it helps him remember which end he needs to wipe.

What has 12 arms and an IQ of 60? Jimmy Kimmel and his staff of ten.

What’s the difference between Big Foot and Kimmel’s brain? Big Foot’s been spotted several times.

Why does Jimmy Kimmel whine? Because he’s practicing to be a man.

Here you can find more “gems” from the “ever-holy-and-independent-thinking” #Kimmel.

Jimmy Kimmel was a vulgar comic long before he was “America’s conscience”

Jimmy Kimmel Defends Disgraced Sex Predator Harvey Weinstein

Late Night Hosts So Disgusted By Harvey Weinstein Scandal They Refuse To Even Mention His Name

Harvey Weinstein the Dems’ inconvenient truth

It’s Her Job

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on March 26, 2015 by andelino

Salvo 01

Indonesian wear manufacturer “Salvo Sports” caused outrage on social media platforms for printing washing instructions many found “offensive and sexist,” according to the BBC.

Sunday also marked “International Women’s Day,” which is supposed to raise “awareness” about remaining “inequalities” between men and women in many parts of the world.

“Give this jersey to your woman. It’s her job,” the shirts read and worn by the players of Indonesian soccer club “Pusamania Borneo.”

According to Reuters, the Indonesian wear manufacturer reacted to the “backlash” by issuing a “public” apology.

“The message is simply, instead of washing it in the wrong way you might as well give it to a lady because they are more capable,” Salvo said in a statement posted on Twitter.

“There’s no intention to humiliate women. In contrast, we want to tell the men to learn from women on how to take care of clothes because they pay attention to details,” Reuters quoted the company.

For some, however, even the “apology” itself came close to an “insult.”

The embarrassing incident has a serious background: “Human rights organizations have continuously criticized the neglect of women’s rights in Indonesia.”

In its 2015 report, “Human Rights Watch” concluded that the country’s government “should address the rollback in women’s rights over the past decade.”

Many local regulations “require” female students and civil servants, among other women and girls, to wear the “hijab.”

Across the country, female applicants to Indonesia’s National Police must take abusive, degrading, and discriminatory “virginity tests.”

A 2013 report by the World Economic Forum ranked Indonesia 95th in the world in regard to “gender” gaps.

Italy, a country that performed slightly better and came in 71st, was recently “shocked” by an incident similar to the alleged “sexism” of Salvo Sports.

Salvo 04

Give them to your mother, it’s her job.

In mid-February, Italian brand “Shoeshine” was criticized for a washing instruction on “cardigans” that reportedly advised wearers to “give them to your mother, it’s her job.”

According to European news Web site The Local,” local politician Federica Mazzoni officially “complained” about the label and “criticized” the instruction in a Facebook post.

“Doing the washing is not the mother’s job, fathers are also capable of turning a simple knob,” she reportedly wrote.

Salvo 05

The washing label inside the trousers from Madhouse.

Not to be outdone by Indonesia and Italy, this label was spotted inside a pair of “chinos” from the UK discount clothing store Madhouse who apologized for their oversight in not catching the sexist message, promising to be “more careful in future.”

That’s awesome news. Shout out to Indonesia, Italy and the UK! They just go “ham” when it comes to telling it like it is.

I don’t see how this is “insulting” to women whatsoever.

It’s a “scientific” fact that women do “laundry” better than men. It’s not a stereotype if it’s true.

It’s in their DNA to be “genetically” better at “turning” the knob on the washer, “putting” in detergent and clothes, and then “letting” the washer do its thing.

Men are “good” for a few things, but doing “laundry” is not one of them.

What’s hilarious is that “jerseys and trousers” get mass-printed and go through various stages of “print” checking and nobody thought that maybe the “washing instructions” wasn’t such a good idea.


Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on October 11, 2012 by andelino

A newly-opened French restaurant in Sydney said it would remove two urinals designed to resemble a woman’s “lipsticked mouth” and apologized for any offense they caused.

The Ananas Bar and Brasserie said the bright red-lipped urinals shaped like an open mouth were “a commonly used European design piece from female Dutch artist Meike van Schijndel”.

“We sincerely apologize if they have caused offense. They are being removed today,” a spokeswoman said in a statement. The stylish restaurant opened three weeks ago, with the Sydney Morning Herald’s food reviewer describing the urinals as “no real surprise here at Ananas, merely adding to the extraordinary collision of statements and intent”.

But feminist, former political adviser and writer Anne Summers said the design was offensive. “Misogyny is very widespread, and this is just an example of misogyny,” said Summers. “The concept is pretty challenging and confronting. They’re asking men to put their dick in these lipsticked urinal mouths.”

“Really?” Removed because one feminist woman was offended? I am all for women’s lib to a point but at the end of the day these urinals were in a men’s loo. People who take offense at that really need to “get a life”. My question is “what was the food reviewer critiquing” in the Men’s Room in the first place? Maybe we should create toilet seats in the Ladies Room with a “man’s face and open mouth” to let women libbers take revenge.

Australia is in the grip of a fierce political debate about “sexism” after Prime Minister Julia Gillard, the nation’s first woman leader, accused opposition leader Tony Abbott of being a “misogynist.”

The unmarried Gillard said on Tuesday she had been personally offended by many of Abbott’s remarks over the years – from urging her to “make an honest woman of herself”, to his “cat-calling” at her in parliament.

“If he wants to know what misogyny looks like in modern Australia, he doesn’t need a motion in the House of Representatives, he needs a mirror,” she said in stinging comments.

%d bloggers like this: