Archive for rex tillerson

Settled Climate Science

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on May 15, 2017 by andelino

Liberal Democrat, “climate alarmist” and daughter of President Trump, “Ivanka”, has been tapped by her father to head a review of the United States commitment to the UN Paris 2015 climate agreement.

That document is an UN-ratified “faux-treaty” that is 31 sheets of “dictatorial” fish-wrap unilaterally “imposed” upon America by Barack Hussein Obama and John Kerry, with some timely help from “co-conspirator” Pope Francis and others.

Obama “committed” America in 2015 to the national “suicide” of cutting our economic activity while transferring our “wealth and technology” to what they term “developing nations” in a mad dash to global “equity and uniformity.”

The most important “goal,” though unstated for obvious reasons, is the “elimination” of the US from its perch atop the world “economic” hierarchy, a pretext for a “global” government under UN “fascist” control.

Obama signed us up to “cut” our economic activity by at least 26 percent “below” our 2005 levels, which was already an industrially “depressed” period, by 2025. That’s just eight “short” years from now, the “duration” of the Trump administration if he is a “two-term” president.

Without the US involved as the “willing” victim there is no Paris summit. It is dead. The only reason other nations are signed up for this “nonsense” is so that they can get a position at the “trough” feeding upon the pieces of America’s “carcass” or to help guarantee our “demise.”

Every other nation is “acting” in their own self interest, either “declining” the hemlock, as is the case with China, Russia and India, who chose not to “self-destruct,” or by being on the expected receiving end of “money, capacity and technology” stolen from the American people by the supreme “grifter and commie conman,” Hussein Obama.

Of the “31 pages” of the document there are only “four or five” sentences that even deal with “global temperatures” and were likely “inserted” for the sake of maintaining appearances. There is nothing technical. It is nothing more than “property acquisition, wealth and technology redistribution, social engineering and international welfare agreement.”

The “globalists” of the United Nations will be holding a “climate change” or “America pillaging” meeting in Bonn, Germany.

President Trump’s “advisers,” of which liberal “wonder girl” Ivanka is one, will be meeting in Washington to “finalize” the United States’ official “position” of whether or not to “honor” the bogus, “death to America” document.

Bloomberg reported last month that, “Both the president’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, and her husband, Jared Kushner, a White House special adviser, have urged the president to stay in the deal, along with Tillerson.”

An unnamed State Department official told the AP, “The decision to participate in next week’s U.N. climate talks shouldn’t be construed as a sign that Trump has decided to stay in the Paris pact.”

“To the contrary, the U.S. will be sending a ‘much smaller’ delegation than it has in years past.” That statement is encouraging.

How is it that the US can “contribute” the lion’s share to their “slush” fund of $100 billion per year by 2020, but we “can’t” find $14 billion for a “border” wall?

We can help fund our own “destruction” but have no money for “defending” our sovereignty?

The entire “document” is an obvious “fraud” but consider the following “excerpts” of many as emblematic:

“Acknowledging that climate change is common concern of humankind, Parties should, when taking action to address climate change, respect, promote and consider their respective obligations on human rights, the right to health, the rights of indigenous peoples, local communities, migrants, children, persons with disabilities and people in vulnerable situations and the right to development, as well as gender equality, empowerment of women and inter-generational equity.

Also recognizing that sustainable lifestyles [UN Agenda 2030] and sustainable patterns of consumption and production, with developed country Parties taking the lead, [providing the money] play an important role in addressing climate change.”

Those aren’t the “words” of addressing a supposed  “climate emergency” but of global social engineering on our dime of “wresting global control of the world for the UN and their Agenda 2030 authoritarian power grab.”

The “money” for all of this has to come from “somewhere” and that somewhere is “us.”

It’s no “exaggeration” to say that America is being “tied up and gang raped” by the UN predators through this “agreement.”

Americans are opposed to “rape,” particularly under a “blue” UN helmet.

We’re saying “no,” Ivanka, and “no means no.”

Let what was settled now be resettled. Scores of American settled scientists and other Al Gore-aligned “prog-activists” may soon join the “bureaucratic” conga lines, “renounce” their US citizenship, and “pledge” their fortunes and sacred “honor” to the European Union after the newly elected President of France Emmanuel Macron “pleaded” with them to leave their Trump “infected” motherland in a passionately tweeted video.

“Please come to France. You are welcome, it’s your nation,” Macron said in a short video message to US researchers, entrepreneurs and engineers. “I do know your new president has decided to jeopardize your budget, your initiatives as he is extremely skeptical about climate change. I have no doubt about climate change and how committed we have to be regarding this issue.”

Indeed, France is quickly turning into the “Climate Change Mecca,” which is why millions of “immigrants” from all over the world, including many “Islamic” climate researchers, are “flocking” to this fairy-tale land of “lactose-free milk, sugar-free honey, coal-free power plants, and green-colored, environmentally friendly suicide vests.”

We would answer Macron’s call to “resettle,” but someone needs to stay “behind” and keep the science “settled” here. It’s a “dirty” job but somebody has to do it. That and the “fact” that French “shovels” have a different, “metric” standard.

Nevertheless, we “fully” support the call for all the “settled scientists to resettle” to France and become the first “officially” registered wave of “climate-change-induced migrations” that Barack Obama has “famously” predicted in his “prophetic” speech.

I envision a remake of “Casablanca: Part Deux” featuring the remains of the new “lost” generation of American climate change “expatriates” in Europe, congregating in one of the last “refuges” from the climate-change-induced “devastation” in north Africa, which has become completely “peaceful” after all its Muslims had “migrated” to Europe.

The famous “lines” will have to be only slightly altered: “Play it again, Barack!” and “We will always have the Paris Agreement.”

And the theme “song” that Barack will play, “As time goes by,” will read…

And when two climatologists meet
They still say, “We have ten years left to save the planet.”
On that you can rely
No matter what the future brings
As time goes by.

Emmanuel Macron also promptly “proposed” a new French initiative called the “Fair Redistribution of Terror in Europe” program.

“It is unfair that France and other enlightened and generous nations, who open their borders and welcome Muslim refugees, must suffer the most from Islamic terrorism,” Macron said after the election.

“Being a fair-minded person, I am both saddened and outraged that less enlightened nations, especially Eastern European countries like Polen and Hungary, who close their borders to Muslim migrants, get to enjoy terror-free existence. It just doesn’t make sense.”

Macron promised to use all his “power and influence” to ensure that “Islamic” terrorism in Europe is “distributed” more equitably.

“This means Poland and Hungary will be forced to absorb more of the terror attacks on European soil because that is what enlightened nations do,” he said.

Asked how his “powers” as President would help to turn his “ideas” into reality, the suave, devastatingly “handsome” Macron reminded everyone that France is not “America” whose government must abide by “outdated” constitutional limitations.

“Americans may brag about their freedom, but it is, in fact, our government that has a lot more freedom to do what’s necessary in any given political situation. In this sense, France is part of a broader community of progressive nations, the European Union, where we believe that every member must shoulder certain burdens in proportion to their geographic sizes and populations.”

“Being that Poland and Hungary are nations of considerable size, I will work with the EU to ensure that they endure terrorist attacks and cultural subversion in exact proportion to their territory – not more and not less – which is only fair.”

“And that begins by opening their borders and allowing in a proportionate quota of refugees from known cauldrons of Islamic terrorism. I can put their minds at ease with my personal guarantee that these quotas will be carefully calculated by highly qualified professionals in Brussels.”

Settled science? Let’s settle the argument
Scientists Found A ‘Totally Unexpected’ Source Of Climate Cooling
Obama Climate Change Speech Earns $3.26M
Ex-military flag officers back Mattis to fight climate change

Syrian War

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on April 11, 2017 by andelino

America Shouldn’t Attack Syria—Russia Isn’t Our Enemy
By Spencer P Morrison

Although “hawkish” Neocons like Ben Shapiro are “rejoicing” that President Trump launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at a Syrian airstrip, I’m not.

Let’s be honest: “the attack was a total waste of money, and frankly, we’re fighting the wrong guys.”

As “bad” as Assad is, he’s a “hell of a lot better” than his “replacements”.

Here’s why “firing” Tomahawk cruise missiles into Syria “was, and is, a bad idea.”

Missiles Are Expensive, Tarmac Is Cheap…

Tomahawk cruise missiles cost $1 million a piece.

Not only that, but the “newer” models that will replace them cost up to “$1.5 million per unit.”

This means that we “wasted” $60-90 million on the attack, not “including” the associated costs, like “deploying” warships in the Mediterranean.

And what did we “use” them to break?  “Tarmac.”

Here’s the deal: “Syria is war-zone, and Assad’s government is essentially a police state.”

Replacing a “runway” will cost Assad next to nothing, assuming he even “pay” people to fix it. It’s not like Syria has a “shortage” of unemployed people,  gravel, or tar, after all.

The Attack Was Pointless…

According to the Daily Mail, Syrian jet fighters took off from the allegedly “bombed-out” runway without issue.

If the goal was “deny” Assad the tactical “advantage” of the airbase, then the attack was a “failure.”

Beyond that, Trump has burned “valuable” political capital with his supporters, who are “divided” over his actions. Many, if not most Americans “want” an end to America’s “involvement” abroad, including spending on foreign aid and the UN, and for them, this is a “step in the wrong direction.”

Assad Is Fighting ISIS & Al-Qaeda For Us…

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t “like” Assad, and I don’t “think” he’s our friend.

But he’s a “hell of a lot more” reasonable than the “moderate rebels” who want to “replace” him, who are backed by “Al-Qaeda, the Islamic State, and the Saudi Arabians.”

The below “clip” is only a minute long watch it.  In it, Assad shares his “thoughts” on the European migrant crisis.

Now “compare” that to this clip of ISIS doing ISIS things like “beheading” Christians and “smashing” Roman artifacts.

Who do you think is more “reasonable?”

Assad.

As you can see in the below map, Assad’s regime is directly in “conflict” with ISIS over major swaths of territory, “he’s killing them for us.”

Again, why are we “interfering?”

More War Means More Migrants

Life under the Assad “regime” wasn’t great.  But it was “tolerable.”

In fact, before the “civil war,” Syrians enjoyed “higher standards of living” than did their Muslim cousins in “Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine, Egypt, or Iraq.”

Since Syria “disintegrated,” millions of Syrians have “lost” everything, and the “chaos” is spreading throughout the “Middle East and Europe.”

The entire region is “destabilized,” which is causing hoards of “migrants” to flood into Europe.

Sweden, for example, is already on its knees, while Germany has been settled by so many migrants that its entire demographic structure has been altered.

If we want to “solve” the migrant crisis in Europe, we need to “stem” the flow if migrants from the “Islamic” world, letting Assad “regain” control will help do that.

Don’t Poke The Bear…

I do not want “war” with Russia.  Neither “do you.”

Why?  Because Russia is a “nuclear” superpower that could “turn” America into glass.

No matter how “improbable” nuclear war with Russia is, we should nevertheless take “caution” to avoid situations that could “escalate,” because the potential consequences are “ruinous.”

Syria is “just” not that important to us: “it has never been in our ambit, nor is there any reason for it to be.”

On the other side, however, Syria is a “longstanding” Russian ally, and it is home to Russia’s only “navy” beyond Russia proper.

Our “intervening” in Syria is akin to how Russia “acted” during the Cuban missile crisis, except with “live-fire.”

Why “risk” it?

Regime Change Doesn’t Work

Rex Tillerson said that there was no role for Assad” in the future of Syria, “hinting” at the potential for another US-led “regime-change.”

This is an “about-face” from what Trump “campaigned” on, and his “rhetoric” up until now.

Not only is “toppling” Assad a bad idea, since it would further “destabilize” the region and open up a “vacuum” that ISIS, and its affiliates, would “happily” fill, but it would be expensive.

Remember the Iraq War?  It cost America $2 trillion and left thousands of American troops “dead and wounded,” for what?  So that ISIS could “kill” every single Assyrian “Christian or “non-Muslim” they could find?

Regime-change “failed” in Iraq.  It “failed” in Libya.  And it will “fail” in Syria or any other “Islamic” nation.

America Should Stay Out Of Syria & Let Assad Kill ISIS

Whatever you “think” of Assad, we can all “agree” that he’s better than “ISIS.”

We should let him “kill them for us”, rather than “risking our own soldiers,” and spending our “own treasure.”

We have enough problems at home to deal with, we don’t need another “foreign excursion” to divert our attention.

I’m done with Trump
No War on Syria
Trump’s Red Line
McCain – “We Can Bring Peace To Syria” Just Oust Assad.
McCain Selling New Syria War
Graham – 7,000 More Troops Going To “War In Syria”

China’s NK Dilemma

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on March 16, 2017 by andelino

Lou  Dobbs has a few “thoughts” as tensions are “rising” in Asia to the “break point.”

“Secretary of State Rex Tillerson will this week attend meetings in Japan, South Korea and China. Tillerson’s meetings motivated by those rising tensions. North Korea is now preparing for a nuclear test, after firing four ballistic missiles over the past week.”

“And China,” Dobbs points out, “not restraining its client state but rather seemingly supporting Kim Jong-un’s irrational conduct and threats. China warning that the United States must pay the price for deployment of ground to air defenses in South Korea. The United States began the positioning of the THAAD missile defense system in South Korea last week, which has a 100% success rate, by the way, in the interception of and destruction of ballistic missiles.”

“The Trump administration also stepping up its response,” says Dobbs, “by supplying armed drones to South Korea, stationing Gray Eagle attack drones about fifty miles south of Seoul. And US Special Forces, including SEAL Team 6, reportedly participating in joint military drills with South Korea.”

Dobbs says, “Beijing is also nearing the completion of its militarization of the artificial islands it built in the disputed waters of the South China Sea. Japan, as a result, sending its largest warship, the Izumo Helicopter Carrier into the South China Sea, where the US Aircraft Carrier Carl Vinson strike force is already on station.”

“Beijing,” says Dobbs, “must wonder at the response of the Trump administration to these threats of its puppet ally, North Korea and its own, hardly concealed aggression. It was less than a year and a half ago that President Xi Jinping stood in the Rose Garden and figuratively patted then-‘president’ Obama on the head and declared China didn’t intend to pursue militarization.”

He adds, “Xi would make a terrible mistake to believe the Trump administration is even remotely as passive or as foolish as the previous administration; or reluctant in any way to meet any challenge.”

North Korea is China’s problem now
China deploying troops at North Korea border after assassination
China and the kid with the bad haircut
A China-controlled future puppet state?
Beijing Has Little to Gain From Pressuring Pyongyang
Kim Jong-un: North Korea’s supreme leader or state puppet?