Archive for rapist

Sexual Predators

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on May 7, 2019 by andelino

The public learned shocking and revolting details that many of Hollywood’s most powerful men had “sexually harassed and assaulted” dozens of women, abetted by teams that covered their “tracks” and suppressed the “truth.”

“Sexual” predation is apparently everywhere. Every day seems to bring fresh allegations of “sexual” harassment, carefully worded public statements, new apologies, resignations and firings.

The accused include high-profile celebrities and leaders: actors such as Dustin Hoffman, Kevin Spacey, Richard Dreyfuss and Ben Affleck; comedians such as Louis C. K. and Andy Dick; film directors such as Oliver Stone, Brett Ratner and James Toback accused by over 100 women)

Scandals have hit media “bigwigs” such as Fox News’s Bill O’Reilly and CEO Roger Ailes as well as producers, publicists and publishers. The shock waves are hitting other professions: “businessmen, doctors, educators, administrators, editors, chefs.”  

They are shaking the “political” world. Mayors, congressmen, even former presidents have been accused. One Democrat representative testified that Capitol Hill is “probably among the worst” of hostile work environments for women.

Collective “moral” outrage has descended suddenly, with stunning fury. The “rules” governing many sectors of society have changed overnight. “Immoral” acts that were tolerated, even encouraged, are now ”repugnant.” Some of the alleged offenses are decades old. It seems no one is “invulnerable”, and the spreading scandals have no end in sight.

In many cases, “evil predatory men” are receiving punishment they richly deserve. Environments where “harassment” was condoned are getting cleaned up. This is undeniably positive.

But that is not all that is happening. Now every “misdeed”, big or small, is being treated with the same “indignation and scorn” and the same presumption of guilt. Many allegations are one person’s word against another’s, but no “politician, commentator, reporter, manager or decision-maker” wants to be seen as an “insensitive” chauvinist. So they automatically “applaud” every woman for courageously “exposing” her assailant.

This lightning-fast, potent “moralistic” about-face is happening for a reason. Once you “understand” the reason, you can “recognize” the real solution.

The overarching lesson drawn by many critics of Weinstein and his “brethren” is that there is something inherently “pernicious” about men in general. Many people now genuinely believe that traditional manhood is “lethal and is destroying our nations.”

Actress Emma Thompson responded to the scandals this way: “So what we need to start talking about is the crisis in masculinity, the crisis of extreme masculinity which is this sort of behavior.”

USA Today wrote, “It’s the culture—both within and beyond Hollywood—dominated by toxic masculinity that ignored Weinstein’s problematic behavior, that let rumor remain rumor, and that endangers women everywhere if it’s not curtailed.”

“Literally and figuratively, toxic masculinity is killing us,” wrote the Boston Globe’s Renée Graham. “Mass shootings. Domestic violence. Fatal fraternity hazing. Rape culture. Workplaces and schools turned into cesspools of sexual harassment and assault. This is not consigned to one race, ethnicity or socioeconomic level. Feral masculinity affirms itself every day through violence and domination.”

Many commentators say that unwanted “come-ons” or even conversational faux pas like “mansplaining” and “manterrupting” are evidence of the same “toxicity” that produces “male-only sins like sex, slavery and rape.”

By this view, all men are potential “rapists”, and are not sufficiently enlightened until they acknowledge this “ugly truth.”

One pundit insisted that this systemic issue has only one solution: “Whenever a man in power is found guilty, fire him—and replace him with a woman.” 

Is “masculinity” the problem? Is there something inherently “toxic” about manhood?

“The concept of toxic masculinity is used in the social sciences to describe traditional norms of behavior among men in contemporary American and European society that are associated with detrimental social and psychological effects,” the Wikipedia page on “toxic masculinity” informs us. “Such ‘toxic’ masculine norms include dominance, devaluation of women, extreme self-reliance, and the suppression of emotions.” 

Thus, if you are male and you subscribe to “traditional norms of behavior,” a growing number of people in this world, some in influential positions, consider you “toxic.”

And what do you do with a “toxic” substance? You “eliminate” it.

There are some people who have been spurred by these “scandals” into a rational, good-faith effort to reduce “sexual” misconduct and raise “moral” standards. But that cause is being hijacked by an army of “amoral, anti-religion, anti-tradition” individuals and institutions with a more “radical” agenda. These people are seizing this opportunity to aggressively advance a long-held ambition to “redefine, isolate, even eradicate traditional masculinity.”

It’s working too. Today there are various programs, including university courses, with names like “Masculinity 101” and “Men’s Project,” designed to help men “purge” their toxicity.

A program called “Rethink Masculinity”, offered by Washington, D.C.’s “Collective Action for Safe Spaces”, describes itself as a class where men “learn how social constructs of masculinity harm them and the people around them, and work to construct healthier masculinities.”

This includes becoming “better allies with women, gender non-conforming people, and other people of marginalized identities.” Teachers, professors and intellectuals are “condemning” anything that promotes traditional “male” roles, including classic literature and Disney movies. Across the planet, famous males are publicly forswearing “behavior associated with conventional masculinity.”

There’s no doubt about it: “The last vestiges of traditional masculinity—already enfeebled after decades of being undermined and assailed—are being targeted for extermination.”

If you consider yourself a “traditional” man, or if you are a woman in a “relationship” with one, you are a target. If you are a male who exhibits “dominance”—perhaps you’re a bit of an extrovert, maybe you occasionally raise your voice, and can give an order or two—you are a target. If you are a male who “suppresses his emotions”—who rarely sheds a tear or shares his feelings—you are a target. If you are a male who practices “extreme self-reliance,” you are a target.

Before you enroll in a “reeducation” program, though, realize that this whole “movement” stems from a spectacular failure to identify the “real source of the problem.”

When you think of Weinstein and these other men, the “fundamental” problem is not traditional masculinity. The central issue isn’t the masculine “tendency” to exert dominance or to treat women differently than men. It isn’t even the “abuse” of power. The fundamental issue is “acute selfishness and vanity, and a desperate lack of self-discipline.”

These are not “male-only” sins. In fact, the Bible says the male and female heart is “deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked.” Jeremiah 17:9. The way of human nature is “the way of vanity, lust and greed—of jealousy and envy—of competition and strife—of rebellion and deceit.”

Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey and the rest of these “sexual” predators were driven by their “deceitful ” nature.

This doesn’t justify their “behavior”, but it does explain it. Fundamentally, the cause of these problems is not “traditional” masculinity. It is people’s “deceitful ” nature.

Rather than blaming all these problems on some kind of “design” flaw in men, we need to recognize that if men and women in Hollywood and elsewhere kept “God’s laws regarding sex,” none of this would be happening.

42 Men Accused of Sexual Misconduct and Their Fall From Power

Misgendering

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on February 18, 2019 by andelino

The “LGBT Community” can’t even escape the fury that comes with the “incorrect use of gender pronouns.”

Julia Beck, a lesbian activist and former member of the LGBTQ Commission for the mayor of Baltimore, got in a “little trouble” after she called a male rapist “he” when “he” actually considered himself a “transgendered” woman.

During a conservative discussion panel at the Heritage Foundation on Monday, Beck told the story she described as “unbelievable and absurd as it is common place.”

“I got kicked off of the Baltimore mayor’s LGBTQ Commission as the only lesbian, simply for stating biological facts,” she said. “After a months long witch hunt I was found guilty of ‘violence.’ My crime? Using male pronouns to talk about a convicted male rapist who identifies as transgender and prefers female pronouns.”

Beck went on to expose the “foolishness” of the Baltimore LGBTQ commission for their concern of using correct “gender pronouns” as opposed to their concern for a male “rapist” infiltrating a female prison based on how he identifies.

“It doesn’t matter that he sexually assaulted two women in a women’s prison after being transferred there on account of his ‘gender identity,’ she continued. “Oh no, it is far more criminal for me to call a male rapist “he” than it is for him to rape.”

The lesbian activist was brought before the Baltimore Transgender Alliance (BTA) to have her “fitness as a leader” assessed and she describes her experience as “worst than you can imagine.”

The president of the BTA, who is a man that identifies as a woman and a lesbian, accused Beck of “transphobia” and everything went down from there.

“Biological sex was a thing of the past,” she described one man in the meeting as saying.

Her response: “How can we be homosexual, if sex is fake?”

After her experience at the BTA meeting, Beck accused the “T” in LGBTQ of “entirely eclipsing the L, G and B,” with their focus on eclipsing the “L.”

She also spoke out against the “left’s tactics” to include children in this “gender identity crisis.”

Take a listen to her story below:

The real crime here, of course, was the denial of his “chosen gender identity” by the knuckle-dragging, close-minded, reactionary “traitor” to womankind, Julia Beck.

The “delusional” lesbian Julia Beck had mistakenly assumed that being a “sexual minority” entitled her to stating biological facts without clearing them first with the High Commissar of “Pronouns and Dangling Participles.”

A speedy show trial found her guilty of “violent transphobia” and sentenced her to the status of a cis-lesbian non-person with the pronoun “it.”

Beck was tried by the “revolutionary” tribunal at Baltimore Transgender Alliance (BTA), where men with “penises who self-identified as lesbian women” stripped her of her rank as a commanding lesbian activist and demoted her to a lowly “private” dyke.

The verdict stated that “biological sex” was a thing of the past and that anyone who said otherwise was a “Trump-loving Nazi.”

Instead of admitting her guilt, signing a teary confession, and doing hours of public self-criticism, the stubborn self-identified woman took a stand and engaged in despicable acts of “gender terrorism and sedition,” asking questions that threatened the very “foundation of the trans-movement.”

Among other transphobic things she claimed that biological sex was an “immutable” fact, otherwise there would be no
“homosexuality.”


This dramatic development touched on the most “existential” issue of our time:

  • If biological sex has no meaning, where do homosexuals come from?
  • If gender is a matter of choice, what force causes people to be attracted to the opposite sex, or to the same sex for that matter?
  • If sex is arbitrary, what was the fight for same-sex marriage about?

Have homosexuals been doing it “wrong” throughout the millennia, instead of simply “changing their sex” for the common good?

Most importantly, why do homosexuals bitterly “cling” to their biological gender? Is it time to “sacrifice” them to the revolution as “crypto-conservatives and enemies of progress?”

Obviously there are two more crimes and two more criminals in this story. The female inmates who were “raped” are both guilty of “sexual immorality” and should immediately be stoned to death.

It is the only way they can atone for their “criminal” behavior and society be protected from any further criminal behavior. These cis-gendered females were undoubtedly wandering the prison “unveiled,” thereby creating “lust in the penis,” whether it was a male or female penis.

If you want a vision of the future … “imagine a lesbian being denounced for improper usage of a personal pronoun when describing a male convict who is preparing for taxpayer-financed penis removal surgery which will greatly enhance the possibility of his committing suicide, and who raped two women inmates because he was confined in a women’s prison because he claims to be a female bull dyke lesbian and …… I’ve lost my train of “thought” …….

Oh, well.

We must fight this “drooling insanity” of forward thinking.

Coronation of a Rapist

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , on October 16, 2016 by andelino

coronation-of-a-rapist-01

coronation-of-a-rapist-03

coronation-of-a-rapist-05coronation-of-a-rapist-02

coronation-of-a-rapist-04

billie-mae-clinton-01

coronation-of-a-rapist-06

Deplorable Me

Deplorable Me

The Rape Hunt

Posted in sex with tags , , , , , , , , on December 13, 2014 by andelino

The Rapist Hunt 00

The “Rape Hunt” continues in full “force” at the Oberlin College.

America is kept in “suspense” as to the Republican “rapist” formerly known as “Barry”, that forced himself onto “liberal” heartthrob Lena Dunham.

All we seem to “really” know about this individual is he was the “Campus Resident Conservative”, wore purple boots, had a voice like Barry White.

According to Dunham, he had a “mustache that rode the line between ironic Williamsburg fashion and big buck hunter,” and, by all deduction, also had a “bad taste” in women.

Although no one “at this time” can say for sure who this “imaginary” evil creep is, there are, however, a few possible “profiles” turning up.

The Rapist Hunt 01

The Rapist Hunt 02

The Rapist Hunt 03

The Rapist Hunt 04

The Rapist Hunt 05

Other “potential” rapist could be “Bill Cosby, Anthony (Carlos) Weiner, William Jefferson Clinton,” just to mention few.

Just like Barack Obama’s “female” interest in his autobiography turned out to be a “composite girlfriend,” Lena Dunham’s Republican is merely a “composite rapist” made of various “figments” of her “erotic” encounters.

Here is a “composite rapist” model of a Republican’s features:

1 – Shiny purple boots
2 – Magnum mustache
3 – Campus resident conservative
4 – Works at radio station
5 – Crotch grabbing wing squirrel

The Rapist Hunt 09

“This is the rapist I have been looking for!” Lena Dunham.

Further “evidence” has emerged that could, in the current “media” climate of disdain for “true” facts, implicate Barack Obama in the unfortunate “rape” encounter.

The Rapist Hunt 08

Especially “considering” that so many members of the media are telling us how “confused” the memories of “rape victims” tend to be.

The Rapist Hunt 10

Liberal “political” commentator, Rachel Maddox, recommends “mandatory” cameras equipped with “App for Apes” for all “male students” across American campuses.

The Rapist Hunt 07

In order to not come across as a “Sexist” women must be given the option of “initiating” male contact, but must “wait” to be asked.

For years we have fought against this “discriminatory” placing of the feminine in passive “relationships” to the masculine.

The “App for Apes” would record your “engagement and questions” with women depending on the “emotional and horny” stage of your relationship:

May I continue to kiss you?
May I continue to fondle your breasts?
May I continue to fondle your Kim Kardashian size ass?
May I continue to “bone you like I own you?”
May I envelop you?
With this orifice?
Perhaps, then, with this orifice?
Well, how about this orifice?

Your partner would respond in the “affirmative” and your smartphone record “his and her voice” for future review in case of “rape” accusations.

All you have to do is “set the timer” for the length of your conversation. State and/or federal guidelines would mandate the “maximum” interval between questions and answers.

If your partner does not “respond” within 5 seconds the authorities are notified of your “transgression” and your GPS location!

The “App for Apes” would then be used as “evidence” in future court cases.

The Rapist Hunt 12

On seconds thoughts, why should we “waste” time trying to “hunt down” one very specific Republican on the basis of “purple” boots and “Magnum” mustache when “all” Republicans are rapists?

They are all “rapists” as surely as they are all “racists.” It’s no coincidence that one need “only” change a single letter for that. They’re insane “ragists” too!

There is no such thing as a “nice” Republican. There is no such thing as a Republican who’s supposedly “just like you and me,” because if there were, guess what, all you borderline geniuses? They would be forward “progressive liberal Democrats!”

There is no such thing” as a Republican who isn’t a total “whack” job. They are all hating “haters” who want to take all of our “rights, entitlements and free stuff “away from us and make us “starve” to death.

That’s if they don’t “shoot” us first, because all Republicans are “gun-toting” gun nuts.

Lena wasn’t just “raped” by one single Republican—she was “raped” by all of them.

All of us are being “raped” by all of them, all of the time, whether “literally or figuratively” through their policies that “serve” only one purpose.

“To rape all of us as a violent show of their hatred of everyone and everything except their own ill-gotten power!”

Don’t “condemn” just one. Damn “them” all, dammit!

Making up “rape” stories is so “hot” right now. Making up a “rape” story to sell more “copies” of your memoir is as “grimy” as it gets.

The Rapist Hunt 11

Right up there with “telling” the whole world you “raped” your sister by fingering her “vagina” when you were “seven” years old.

One must assume that “rape” is something “tolerated and encouraged” in the Dunham family.

Anything to “sell a book,” right Lena! Forget about the “credibility” of what you say and “your over the top, constantly-in-your-face” feminism.

The Rapist Hunt 13

Just take that “power and influence” and exploit the people that “value” your opinion.

“Exaggerate, embellish and flat out lie” if need be! Take the most “serious” allegation, the most “traumatic” experience a “woman” can go through, “fabricate” one for yourself, and “grab” those headlines.

The Rapist Hunt 06

Oh and don’t forget to “reiterate” over and over it was a “Republican Conservative.” Gotta advance that “political agenda” too.

Don’t worry though. Even if this is all “true” and you’re exposed as a total “fraud and scumbag,” there’s always a job “waiting” for you at Rolling Stone.

Lena Dunham 02

Bag of Milk with Camel Toe.

As always with “any” Lena Dunham post, obligatory “Lena Dunham looks like a bag of milk” @DesusNice

Lena Dunham: Why I Chose To Speak Out
Lena Dunham’s publisher says rapist “Barry” wasn’t actually named Barry
Could ‘Barry’ sue Lena Dunham over her memoirs?
Lena and Grace Dunham: Life in the Shame-Free Zone
I Will Not Press Charges Against My Rapist

Father Of The Year 2014

Posted in sex with tags , , , , , , on November 13, 2014 by andelino

Print
A father “invited” his 14-year-old daughter’s “rapist” over for dinner and then “burned” his genitals with “heated” tongs before “strangling” him to death.

The Indian Express reported that Jamil Gupta, the 36-year-old father in India was getting revenge on his underage daughter’s 45-year-old rapist, Omkar Singh.

“He served him dinner,” an officer told the Indian Express. “After the meal, the father overpowered the man and tied him to a chair. He got heated tongs and burned the supplier’s genitals before strangling him to death.”

After killing the man, he “walked” to the police station in the Khajuri Khas district of north-eastern Delhi and “surrendered” himself, giving officers a “detailed” account of what he had done.

Father Of The Year 04

“’I burned his genitals once, he screamed. I did it again, he shuddered. When I did it the third time he did not move, he was dead. I did not want to kill him.”

Police confirmed they found the dead man “lying” in the courtyard outside Gupta’s house with “bruising marks to his neck.

Officers added that his “genitals” were completely burned away.

The “rapist” told his victim not to tell anyone, but she told her “father the same day.

He admitted to the “murder” and said he had been “planning” it since he found out about the rape.

In Gupta’s statement, he told “officers” that two months earlier, when he had been “working” in his shop, Singh, a “medicine” supplier, came to his house.

Father Of The Year 2014 04

Singh found the 14-year-old girl home “alone” and“raped” her. She told her father, who did not “inform” the police for “fear” that family and neighbors would “blame” his daughter.

Singh, 45, ‘impregnated‘ Gupta’s daughter before “boasting” that he was too “well-connected” to local police to ever be “prosecuted.”

The girl was “examined” by doctors who confirmed she was “pregnant” from the sexual assault.

I don’t know the “laws” in India but in the laws of a “father” this was 100% legal.

And for all those keeping “score” at home, this is called “putting your money where your mouth is.”

Want to “tell” people not to “touch” your daughter, not to “mess“with your family?

Well that means every “now and then” you’ll have to “burn” a rapists penis and “strangle” him to death.

That’s just called being a “good” father.

Father Of The Year 2014 02

“Reading” to your children, “playing” catch in the backyard, “burning” anyone’s dick who comes “too close” to your daughter.

No question, “Father Of The Year 2014.” 

Father Of The Year 2014 03

15 Dads Who Won’t Be Winning Father of the Year

Father of the Year 2013

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on January 19, 2013 by andelino

Father of the YearThe National Father`s Day Council announced that it has selected Bill Clinton as a “2013 Father of the Year” Award recipient.

The award will be presented at the 72nd Annual Father of the Year Awards in New York City on Tuesday, June 11, 2013.

I can’t ignore America’s most celebrated “ladies man,” even if he’s no longer “dogged” with the tales of conquest that nearly doomed his presidency.

I didnt have sex with that women

I didn’t have sex with that women

He originally only had “extramarital affairs” with some of the least likely “candidates” imaginable; for example, Paula Jones — the only woman alive who could make Gennifer Flowers look hot.

Bills Mystery Blonde

Now, thankfully, he’s moved on to some seriously “sexy” women, including Canadian politicians and a reportedly gorgeous “mystery blonde.”

As the former Commander in Chief grows older and less influential, it’s nice to see the rest of his “mojo’s” still working.

Bill and his Asian Harem

Fresh off his trip to North Korea to help procure the release of two jailed American journalists, Bill Clinton has returned to southeast Asia for a surprise visit to the Kho Samui Brothel in Pattaya City, Thailand. He said it was great to be back at his old stomping grounds.

Bill during his nude summit in 2008

“I tell you what – these lovely ladies put old Monica to shame, that’s for damn sure,” Clinton told CAP News. “You want to talk about Asian women you wanna rescue and take home, let’s talk about beautiful Tola here. I gave her more presidential pardons when I was in office than I could shake my stick at,” Clinton added.

Bill Poses With Porn Stars

Bill Clinton cannot “escape” himself and posed for an impromptu photo with two “porn stars” at a casino in Monte Carlo, Monaco where he attended a “Nights in Monaco” fundraising gala.

The porn stars with whom Clinton posed were Tasha Reign and Brooklyn Lee. Lee won the coveted award for Best New Starlet at the 2012 AVN Awards in addition to sharing four other awards, including Most Outrageous Sex Scene.

Monica and Bill

Clinton is famous for his “philandering,” which, of course, can only help him” bag” the sexiest ladies in the land.

Stories of gorgeous, busty starlet-types sneaking into his hotel suite are “numerous, legendary and incessant since the 42nd prez stepped back into “civilian” life.

Golfing; leisure; recreation

He possesses such relentless “charm” that women feel like they’re the “only” other person in the room. That must be an “unbeatable” tactic when attempting “seduction.”

He has a sly Southern accent, is a musician, is married and is therefore “unavailable” — all of which can only help him selectively pick out the “sexiest” of a willing pack.

Bill's Stiff Prick

Bill’s Stiff Prick

Just because Clinton has a thing for “attainable” women doesn’t mean he isn’t getting “better” offers.

2013 Father of the Year

An accused “rapist, serial womanizer, unfaithful husband and impeached former president” with but one ridiculously average child, (especially under the circumstances), to be honored as “Father of the Year” must be the ultimate 2013 oxymoron.

 CLINTON’S DEALINGS WITH WOMEN, UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL

%d bloggers like this: