Sen. Paul on Ending Mandates, Omicron and Fauci’s Future
“YouTube has refused to post our @clayandbuck interview with @RandPaul. Think about this for a moment: YouTube is disallowing a doctor and sitting US senator’s interview to be shared. This is madness.” — Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) January 24, 2022
It’s time to put US collaboration with Chinese scientists on ‘gain of function’ coronavirus research under a microscope. The Joe Biden administration closed the US State Department’s investigation into the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic.
But as the pandemic recedes in the United States, there is renewed interest by the scientific and journalistic communities about the origins of the virus and whether it could have escaped from China’s “Wuhan Institute of Virology” (WIV). So, a day later, the president opened a new investigation.
The flip-flop came amid Senator Rand Paul’s claim at a Senate committee hearing on the Covid 19 pandemic that the US collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China to make a more deadly, transmittable coronavirus. That’s putting the Chinese lab leak theory, which Beijing vigorously denies, back at the forefront of the Covid 19 origin debate.
Based on papers published by WIV on the scientific work of Dr. Shi Zhengli, the US government investigators have some catching up to do. In 2015, Dr Shi – popularly known as the “bat lady” – published a paper entitled “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat corona viruses show potential for human emergence.”
Her colleagues on the study included American researchers associated with the University of North Carolina’s Department of Cell Biology were related to work funded by the US government.
It is possible that Dr. Shi and her team successfully converted a coronavirus, specifically SARS-like virus SHCO14-CoV, from bats to other animals and not only mice. It is also possible that the new virus quickly spread to other animals and then to lab workers, three of whom became sick in November 2019, according to a recent Wall Street Journal report.
This is known as “gain of function” research, which is considered by the US to be very dangerous. Between 2014 and 2017, gain of function research, which had been actively subsidized by “The National Institutes of Health” (NIH) and other agencies, was suspended in the US.
Slightly later, in 2019, the US temporarily closed some laboratories, including the “US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases” (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Maryland, over safety issues.
According to the CDC:“The two breaches at Fort Detrick reported by USAMRIID to the CDC demonstrated a failure of the Army laboratory to ‘implement and maintain containment procedures sufficient to contain select agents or toxins’ that were made by operations in biosafety Level 3 and 4 laboratories.”
Level 4 is, in theory, the most secure type of laboratory known today; China’s WIV is also a Level 4 lab. But not all the Wuhan laboratory followed Level 4 standards and there are, as Fort Detrick shows, lapses that need to be accounted for.
In fact, the same kind of lapses that happened at Fort Detrick, which centered on waste treatment, also happened at the Wuhan lab. Furthermore, Fort Detrick was working with other American and foreign labs, which may have included Chinese facilities. For example, Fort Detrick was connected to Canada’s National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg, which was thoroughly penetrated by the Chinese, including at least one known member of China’s bio-warfare community.
According to Canada’sGlobe and Mail newspaper: “One of the Chinese researchers, Feihu Yan, from the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) Academy of Military Medical Sciences, worked for a period of time at the Winnipeg lab, a Level 4 facility equipped to handle some of the world’s deadliest diseases.”
There were at least seven Chinese scientists at the lab. Two of them, “Xiangguo Qiu and her biologist husband, Keding Cheng, were fired in January 2021 after the Canadian Security Intelligence Service recommended that their security clearances be removed on national security grounds,” allegedly for sending samples of deadly viruses to the Wuhan lab.
On at least one occasion, Qiu, and probably others, visited the Fort Detrick Laboratory. The details are not known, but it can be reasonably surmised that the Winnipeg Lab and Fort Detrick were cooperating, and this cooperation might have included Wuhan.
Was Canada a weak link? Given Fort Detrick’s security level, further investigation is essential. It also begs the question of Canada giving Chinese scientists, including at least one from the PLA’s Academy of Military Sciences, top secret clearances.
The US and Canada, as part of the “North American Defense Sharing Agreement” share classified information, which means there is a strong possibility that some classified American information made its way to Winnipeg and then to Wuhan or elsewhere in China.
Not only does WIV need further investigation, but so do American institutions including the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the CDC and Fort Detrick. In 2017 and 2018, the US did at least two inspections of the Wuhan Laboratory. That raises the question of why did a US inspection team gain entry multiple times to a sensitive Chinese laboratory?
The answer seems to be that the Americans had special status because of high-level, top-secret cooperation between the US, China and Canada.
US infectious disease expert Dr Anthony Fauci has said it would have been “almost a dereliction of our duty” if the NIH had not worked with China to study corona viruses and “collaborate” with “very respectable Chinese scientists.”
“Respectable scientists” working for the Chinese government. That’s another avenue for investigation.
International collaboration suggests the US may have halted gain of function research because it was easier and less politically risky to let China do it. China has lower legal standards – try litigating in China if you have any doubt – and, as Fauci said, the US government funded Chinese labs and happily published papers by Chinese scientists.
Those papers today give us a partial record of what the Chinese with the CDC and NIH – and perhaps even the US Army – were up to.
The US intelligence community had to know all of this, and a lot more. But the CIA and other senior American officials, including James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, insisted that Covid 19 did not come from the Wuhan Laboratory but was zoonotic, namely that it was transmitted in nature by animals.
Today the CIA appears to have tentatively reversed course as American scientists press for more information.
A proper investigation would have to ask why the US would trust China, knowing how sloppy the Chinese are about food and safety standards. The faulty ventilators, Covid 19 test kits and N-95 masks for physicians and health workers that were sent abroad by China after the outbreak of the epidemic illustrated this clearly for the world to see.
But beyond sloppiness, it seems the US decided to fund and shift dangerous research to Chinese labs run by the Chinese state. The Biden administration erred in closing the investigation and is right to have opened a new one.
President Donald Trump was right again. He said Covid 19 could have leaked from the virology lab in Wuhan, China. That was in April 2020—more than a year ago. And the propaganda media has been hammering President Trump and any other leader or analyst or everyday person who states some obvious, straightforward facts about the origins of this pandemic. They have taken turns vociferously, creatively, smugly, incessantly blasting people for believing in a “deranged, dangerous, conspiracy theory” for a year!
Now that they have trashed and repeatedly trampled everyone’s reputation and credibility for months and months, the propagandists are quietly admitting that President Trump was right. They have accomplished their agenda of forcing the president out of power, and now it apparently serves their agenda to quietly, subtly admit the truth. This is just another perfect illustration of the “Trump Derangement Syndrome” the media have been trapped in since 2015.
Rewind to the April 30, 2020, White House press conference when a reporter asked President Trump: “Have you seen anything at this point that gives you a high degree of confidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the origin of this virus?” The president responded: “Yes, I have. Yes, I have. And I think the World Health Organization should be ashamed of themselves, because they’re the public relations agency for China.”
Just days after President Trump made these comments, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told ABC News that there was “enormous evidence” that Covid 19 originated in a laboratory in the Chinese city of Wuhan. The Global Times newspaper, which is owned by the Communist Chinese regime, claimed that Pompeo had “stunned the world with groundless accusations.” Dr. Shi Zhengli, who directs the “Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, demanded that President Trump apologize. The propaganda media rallied to whom? The president? Or the Communist Party of China? You probably know the answer.
ABC’s Jonathan Karl recently admitted that the media dismissed the Wuhan lab leak theory simply because Republicans proposed it. And CNN is now reporting that the Biden administration shut down a State Department effort launched by Mike Pompeo to prove the coronavirus originated in a Chinese lab. Apparently, the Democrat-media complex was desperate to keep the origins of Covid 19 secret. In many ways, the “radical” left thinks more like the Chinese Communist Party than like their fellow Americans in the Republican Party.
The U.S. had withdrawn funding to China in 2014 due to fears over controversial experiments to make pathogens more virulent. An unclassified cable warned of “inadequate safety practices and management weaknesses” as researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology “conducted research on corona viruses from bats.” The cable said the lab had “a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.”
The propaganda media decision-makers knew these same things that the rest of the world knew. They knew that China was conducting dangerous research on bat corona viruses, but still slurred Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo as “conspiracy theorists” and “racists” for warning everyday Americans of the danger. Why would they do something so despicable? Evidence is accumulating that indicates they did this to protect the reputation of the director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. His name is Dr. Anthony Fauci, aka “Flip Flopping Tony.”
PJ Media recently reported that Dr. Fauci wrote an article in 2012 saying that “gain of function” research on bat corona viruses was worth the risk of a pandemic if it increases our knowledge of diseases. “In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?” he wrote for the American Society for Microbiology. “Scientists working in this field might say—as indeed I have said—that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.”
Only two years after Fauci defended “gain of function” research, it was banned by the U.S. government. But apparently Dr. Fauci found a loophole because he is now admitting to U.S. lawmakers that, under his guidance, the National Institutes of Health earmarked $600,000 for the “Wuhan Institute of Virology” and funneled it to the Chinese lab through the non-profit “EcoHealth Alliance.” This money was used to study whether bat corona viruses could be transmitted to humans. This research may have caused the Covid 19 pandemic.
Even “Fraud-In-Chief” Joe Biden is now admitting that Covid 19 may have been the result of a lab accident. A logical person has to consider that the entire media narrative that the Wuhan lab leak was a “conspiracy theory” was a lie! It was used to attack President Trump and hide the fact that the entire Covid 19 pandemic may actually be Dr. Fauci’s fault.
Why did the U.S. need to fund a Chinese laboratory to research corona viruses? Why would Dr. Fauci’s taxpayer-funded institute ever need to send grants to a laboratory in China?
When Dr. Fauci was questioned by Sen. Rand Paul, he said his institute had to send money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology because horseshoe bats do not live in America, and that he was sure the Chinese were not using the funds for “gain of function” research. But he was forced to grudgingly admit that he trusted the Communist Party in China to use the money America provided to study diseases and could not “guarantee that a grantee has not lied to us, because you never know.”
In Fauci’s world, if a Communist Party scientist says she is using U.S. research grants to study diseases, she must be believed and paid. But if the president of the United States says she may be misusing those grants, he is a conspiracy theorist or liar.
And now a previously undisclosed U.S. intelligence report has revealed that the first three people to catch Covid 19 were all researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Biden and other Democrats have to deal with this as they explain their embarrassing closure of Pompeo’s investigation. Not only did Covid 19 escape the Wuhan Institute of Virology, it escaped after being bio-engineered by Communist Party scientists using money received from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Dr. Fauci.
“The coronavirus crisis has exposed the true nature of the Chinese Communist Party as nothing ever has.” It should be a sobering warning to the entire world! For years, China has worked ferociously to surpass the U.S. in economic power and scientific advancements. By now, it probably has overtaken America by some economic measures. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is also amassing staggering levels of military power. It is bent on asserting more and more control not just over the people of China, but over the territory and people in the nation’s periphery. Meanwhile, the coronavirus that the CCP unleashed onto the world has cost the U.S. trillions of dollars. America’s national debt keeps climbing toward $30 trillion. This weakness will be a major factor that strips the U.S. of its superpower status and a lot more.”
Now we have even more documented proof that China was developing Covid 19 as a weapon and that the deep state agents in the United States were helping them do so. Covid 19 is a man-made plague engineered by “radical leftists” on both sides of the Pacific Ocean. You would think that more people in America’s government would be suspicious of the Chinese Communist Party, but it is like the Prophet Isaiah foretold: “Woe to the sinful nation, a people whose guilt is great, a brood of evildoers, children given to corruption! They have forsaken the Lord; they have spurned the Holy One of Israel and turned their backs on him. Why should you be beaten anymore? Why do you persist in rebellion? Your whole head is injured, your whole heart afflicted. From the sole of your foot to the top of your head there is no soundness, only wounds and welts and open sores, not cleansed or bandaged or soothed with olive oil.” (Isaiah 1:4-6)
The fact that that the “National Institute of Health” was funding Communist biotechnology research, while the propaganda media attacked anyone who tried to talk about the truth shows the depth of America’s spiritual sickness. It’s far worse than any biological pandemic. Because of spiritual sickness, America’s political, economic and military power is draining away!
More videos about “The Fauci Virus” can be seen here.
“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. And God said, Let there be light, and, Let the water teem with living creatures. Then God said, Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground. Then Tony Fauci said, Let us improve upon God’s work and create viruses in our NIH labs” – The New Book of Genesis
Within a few days or weeks, Robert “Rachel” Levine might become the assistant secretary for the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
This would be the first openly “transgender” person to be appointed to a president-nominated, Senate-confirmed federal office in history. And we are not sure what this nominee thinks about “surgically removing and altering the sex organs of children because the nominee won’t tell us.”
This silence is part of something much larger. There is a massive effort underway to hide the ugly truth about “transgenderism.” And it will go so far as to “ensnare” our children.
People who believe they are a different “gender” suffer much more depression and anxiety. Those who have actually undergone surgery—which is supposed to make them more self-actualized—suffer so badly that they are 19 times more likely than the average person to “kill” themselves.
The solution? “Radicals” in the Biden White House and across the American elite say the solution is even more “transgender acceptance, promotion, education, therapy and surgery, even on children.” People who argue this are unaware of or “lying” about the facts.
Richard Levine was born in 1957, graduated from high school in Massachusetts, went to Harvard and Tulane and became a doctor focusing on “pediatrics and adolescents.” He was married, had two children and sang baritone in musical theater.
About 20 years ago, he began seeing a “therapist”, 13 years ago he began growing “out his hair”, and 10 years ago he said he was a “woman” named Rachel. Six years ago he became the “physician general” of Pennsylvania, four years ago he became “secretary” of the state department of health, and recently Joe Biden nominated him to become “assistant health secretary” of the United States.
The confirmation hearing for Levine was the “transgender agenda in microcosm.” Sen. Rand Paul questioned the nominee on whether children should be able to “bypass” their parents and, through medical professionals, interventions and surgery, try to “change their sex.”
Levine’s answer was an evasion that amounted to: “Confirm me as assistant secretary, and then I’ll gladly answer.”
This was after Senator Paul had pointed out that “genital mutilation” has been condemned by governments around the world, including in the World Health Organization and the United Nations. “Genital mutilation is considered particularly egregious because, as the who notes, it is nearly always carried out on minors and is a violation of the rights of children,” he said. “Dr. Levine, you have supported both allowing minors to be given hormone blockers, to prevent them from going through puberty, as well as surgical destruction of a minor’s genitalia.”
After Levine’s evasion, Senator Paul said, “What I’m alarmed at is that you’re not willing to say absolutely [that] minors shouldn’t be making decisions to amputate their breast or to amputate their genitalia. Will you make a more firm decision on whether or not minors should be involved in these decisions?” Levine wouldn’t answer.
This is where the United States of America is now. In the Senate. In an official, open hearing. A man who has “destroyed” his gender has been “nominated” to high office by the highest office in the land. And he won’t answer a question about whether he thinks children should undergo “genital mutilation.”
And the most prominent voices in the nation are criticizing whom? The senator who asked the question. For example, here’s how ABC News, the Daily Beast and the Washington Post portrayed it: “First transgender nominee deflects inflammatory questions from GOP senator,” “Rand Paul Launches Into Transphobic Rant Against Trans Nominee,” and “Rand Paul’s ignorant questioning of Rachel Levine showed why we need her in government.”
There is a reason why Levine won’t answer that question. It’s because “transgender” activists know that the “less the public” understands about these procedures, the better. The more you know about these procedures, the more “appalled” you will be!
Senator Paul told commentator Glenn Beck that his question was “whether or not a child is or should be legally capable of consenting to such a drastic measure, or whether his or her parent should make the decision.” But mainstream media outlets are showing themselves totally on board with the transgender movement and portrayed him as guilty of a “transphobic rant.”
“Should children be able to decide for themselves whether to have irreversible surgical and hormonal treatments that destroy their healthy body parts and much of who they are?”
Richard Levine won’t say, but he’ll be happy to talk about it after you “confirm” him as United States Assistant Secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services, where the motto is “Improving the health, safety and well-being of America.”
According to mainstream news executives and their journalists, you are a “bigot” for asking the question.
Society has transformed overnight to adopt a “radical and destructive” way of thinking. The Senate is certain to confirm Richard Levine, and nobody except Senator Paul seemed to raise an eyebrow about a “man who thinks he’s a woman” becoming chief adviser to a cabinet-level official in the federal government.
While the media covers for them, members of the Biden administration and the new Congress are rapidly moving to force the “transgender“ agenda into law.
Just recently, the House of Representatives passed the “Equality Act.” If it passes in the Senate—the same Senate that is about to confirm its first transgender person—then the law of the land will offer this guarantee to homosexuals and transgenders: “An individual shall not be denied access to a shared facility, including a restroom, a locker room and a dressing room, that is in accordance with the individual’s gender identity.”
This is a weapon against anyone who does not fully embrace this “bizarre” new idea about gender, which goes against biology, science, and the functioning of family and society that almost all human beings have understood for all of human history.
The “Equality Act” gives the government massive power to punish “any establishment that provides a good, service, or program, including a store, shopping center, online retailer or service provider, salon, bank, gas station, food bank, service or care center, shelter, travel agency or funeral parlor, or establishment that provides health care, accounting or legal services,” along with any organization that receives any federal funding.
You must agree that a “man pretending he’s a woman is a woman”, or the government will block you from participating in public commerce.
This is an advanced stage of “radical sexual rebellion” that has already been working on the minds of young people for generations now. Young people are and have been growing up in a society where “homosexuality, pan sexuality, transgenderism and gender fluidity” not only have their place but are celebrated. And these young people are getting the message.
A new Gallup Poll reports that of all U.S. adults, 5.6 percent say they are “lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender.” That’s a 60 percent jump in less than a decade. And the biggest part of that jump happened in Generation Z. Among those born between 1997 and 2002, a jaw-dropping 16 percent categorize themselves as not “heterosexual.” Among these young adults, that’s one out of every six!
And if “radicals” get their way—and they are getting their way—more and more children far younger than their 20s will be asking about gender and considering surgical destruction of their gender.
The news stories that started as a trickle a few years ago are now coming in a flood. Just a few days ago, reports came out that the state of Illinois has adopted new standards that will revoke a teacher’s license if they do not indoctrinate their students in the propaganda of “lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgenders” and a host of other leftist causes.
Members of the Illinois Board of Education call this “The Illinois Culturally Responsive Teaching and Leading Standards,” which specify:
“The culturally responsive teacher and leader will: Understand and value the notion that multiple lived experiences exist, that there is not one ‘correct’ way of doing or understanding something. Recognize how their identity (race/ethnicity, national origin, language, sex and gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, physical/developmental/emotional ability, socioeconomic class, religion, etc.) affects their perspectives and beliefs about pedagogy and students.”
Under “Systems of Oppression” they write, “Culturally responsive teachers and leaders understand that there are systems in our society that create and reinforce inequities, thereby creating oppressive conditions. Educators work actively against these systems in their everyday roles in educational institutions. The culturally responsive teacher and leader will implement and integrate the wide spectrum and fluidity of identities in the curriculum.”
Stanley Kurtz, senior fellow at the “Ethics and Public Policy Center”, wrote in National Review that with a Biden administration overseeing education, these Illinois standards are likely to go national. However it happens, schools are increasingly imposing this agenda on their teachers and on our children.
In its haste to show itself accepting, tolerant and welcoming of “men who decide they are women”, American society is overlooking, ignoring, denying and trampling on precious and important truths. We need to understand the truth about “transgenderism.”
This isn’t just a matter of accepting a handful of people whose thinking doesn’t match their biology. This has huge ramifications in every aspect of modern life.
“It raises not just economic questions in areas like public bathrooms, gym facilities, prisons and homeless shelters—not just educational questions like what the state is force-feeding your kindergartner’s mind—but also questions about freedom of speech and freedom of religion, questions about whether you can be fined or jailed for being anything less than fully supportive of this movement, or whether you are free to live by the dictates of your own conscience.”
Society can’t afford to accept this lightly. It needs answers. But Richard Levine refused to answer an easy, obvious question. That is just a small glimpse of what this movement is all about. It pushes aside “facts and truth.” It is interested only in the power to “transform” society.
If you want an answer to the question, if you want truth about transgenderism, read “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment” by Ryan T. Anderson.
He is president of the “Ethics and Public Policy Center”, he was a senior research fellow at “The Heritage Foundation”, he is founder and editor in chief of the “Witherspoon Institutes’ Public Discourse”, he has written four books and pieces for the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, National Review, and many other prominent publications, and he has appeared on CNN CNBC, MSNBC and Fox News.
Published in 2018, “When Harry Became Sally” is full of important truth about the transgender trend and what actually happens to people who try to change their gender. But if you want to buy this book from the world’s largest bookseller, like I did a couple of years ago, you can’t.
Amazon has removed it. It was approving it according to its content policy, selling it, profiting from it for three years, but on or around February 21, it disappeared. Nobody knows why, including Anderson. He posted on social media:
“A week after they removed my book, Amazon still refuses to say which aspect of their ‘content policy’” the book violates (after three years of not violating that policy). And they refuse to say which page of the book commits the offense.”
There are powerful forces in politics, business, entertainment, journalism, sports and every other aspect of society that are forcing through the transgender agenda, in spite of what transgenderism is.
Here are some facts. It is a scientific fact that people are biologically male or female. It is a scientific fact that biological sex comes with physiological and even mental and emotional predispositions. But science can tell you nothing about a man feeling that he is actually a woman. There is no scientific explanation for that.
Trans supporters say that when a person’s thinking doesn’t harmonize with biology, he should not change his thinking—he should change his biology.
Correcting his thinking would be bigoted, discriminatory and wrong. Acting like the opposite sex, using hormone blockers, and intentionally mutilating his genitalia would be sophisticated, healthy and fulfilling. It is difficult to comprehend just how many contradictions are contained in this thinking.
Transgender activists say gender is an “artificial construct.” Yet at the same time, they say the entire society must pivot for someone who is exhibiting stereotypical and even cartoonish expressions of his “authentic gender identity”—if it is different from his actual, scientific gender identity.
They say a person’s “real self” is separate from his or her physical body. Then they say that the that person’s body must be surgically transformed to make the person “whole.” They say that even children must take puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgical procedures to match the physical body to the idea in the mind.
This thinking is obviously and blatantly anti-science. But if you try to talk about scientific facts, you are labeled an intolerant, discriminating bigot.
Here are more facts these activists portray as “transphobic.” Science shows that among children who struggle with gender dysphoria, 80 percent of girls and 95 percent of boys will reconcile with their biological sex if they are allowed to go through puberty. Puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones have been shown to damage cardiovascular health, bone density and reproductive functions.
Nearly half of people who identify as transgender experience “anxiety disorders or depression.” An estimated 41 percent have tried to “kill” themselves. Those who undergo sex-change interventions—far from experiencing lasting mental health benefits—are 19 times more likely to commit “suicide.”
Some people suffer the misery of undergoing the surgery and then bitterly regret it. Some even undergo surgery to undo the surgery and try to UN-destroy their gender. That alone tells you that trying to alter their gender did not help them become their “authentic selves,” and it certainly has not led to happiness.
Genital reconstructive surgery is a field, and Professor Miroslav Djordjevic is a leading figure in that field. For years, he has been voicing his concern about rising requests for “gender-reversal” surgeries. He says people wishing to undergo the transformation should receive better counsel. He says the effort to be politically correct is driving these decisions—rather than what is actually correct for the best interest of the individuals involved.
While studies on the effects of transgender procedures are rare for some reason, many unhappy stories are out there. When Harry Became Sally has an entire chapter titled “Detransitioners Tell Their Stories,” and it is heartbreaking. Many describe becoming dissatisfied with their sexuality early in life and trying to find happiness in things like sexual affairs. Then they were offered a radical solution: “become the other gender through the wonders of surgical science.”
If you have a lot of faith in the wonders of modern medicine, it sounds easy. But the reality is, biological differences between men and women are far-reaching and complex.
Hormone blockers can prevent a boy’s voice from getting deeper or a girl’s hips from getting wider, taking hormones can shrink a man’s testicles or cause a woman to grow facial hair, and surgery can amputate body parts specific to male or female and attach artificial body parts.
But the reality is that no matter how advanced or expensive the treatment or procedure—science cannot actually “turn a man into a woman, or a woman into a man.”
The scientific fact is that biological sex is embedded in your DNA from conception, and it affects every system in your body.
So many of these individuals who undergo these procedures often find themselves requiring substantially more medical attention. Rather than being happier, they often grow even more depressed and even suicidal. Many say the doctors who advised them led them astray.
Let’s insist on science. Let’s insist on facts. Let’s do this for the sake of all those in our society, from adult to child, who stand to lose so much and suffer so much because of ignorance.
The fact is: “Encouraging a child that their feeling of confusion is correct does not make that child happy. Teaching him that trouble with other kids and adults comes from everyone being bigots does not make that child happy. Allowing a child into the restroom of the opposite sex does not make him happy. Allowing him to win wrestling matches against girls will not make him happy. Censoring all discussion about transgender facts will not make him happy.”
The idea that sex changes and societal transformation will solve the depression, misery and heartache of this group of people is a dangerous lie—a lie being boldly told at a tremendous cost! It is increasing the suffering of so many who identify as transgender.
It is a dangerous assault on truth, and how many victims it is claiming and who is the real author of this otherwise inexplicable deception: “the father of lies.”
There’s something big going on here, something with the most twisted of consequences and the youngest of victims. Insist on the facts. Have a willingness to fight for them. You’re going to need it.
So, remember, cutting off your penis doesn’t make you a girl, it just makes you a guy without a penis. Vice versa for women.
There is a flurry of so called “whistleblower” news spots focused on a young man who has been in the White House since Obama took office.
This has resulted in a significant flow of “on-line articles” and so-called photos of this “person” with the implication he is: “The whistleblower” and “An operator in Obama’s deep-state coup.”
All this conjecture and speculation is what the Mueller “Witch Hunt” and the Schiff “Impeach Fiasco” are built upon.
A year after Ukraine official and whistleblower Eric Ciaramella left President Trump’s White House, a picture of him shaking Barack Obama’s hand was published on a close friend’s wedding website.
The Oval Office photograph is circulating among Trump allies who consider it evidence that the whistleblower is biased against Trump and had partisan motivations when he filed an Aug. 12 complaint that sparked impeachment proceedings.
Ukraine specialist Eric Ciaramella poses for a photo with former President Barack Obama at the White House. The photo was published on the website for a friend’s 2018 wedding.
In the photograph, a smiling Ciaramella, then Ukraine director on the “National Security Council” at the White House, is shown shaking Obama’s hand. They are standing in front of a portrait of Abraham Lincoln by George Henry Story.
Ukraine whistleblower Eric Ciaramellawas close friends at the White House with an official who is now a “key aide” to Adam Schiff, the House Intelligence Committee chairman leading the Democratic push to “impeach” President Trump.
In an interview Sen. Rand Paul called for the Ukraine whistleblower to testify as a fact witness in the impeachment inquiry against President Trump:
“I think Ukraine whistleblower Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony… he is a person of interest in the sense that he was at the Ukraine desk when Joe Biden was there and Hunter Biden was working for Ukrainian oligarchs. Simply for that, I think he is a material witness and needs to be brought in, the other question is, while the whistleblower is protected from being fired or from retaliation in court proceedings, the whistleblower is not protected from being asked who gave him the information, because we can’t have a country where the private contents of the president’s phone calls are leaked to people who are not supposed to be in that loop.
I think all these questions have to be asked. I don’t think the whistleblower statute was never intended to have criminal trials and people put before the penalty of criminal justice without being able to hear from their accusers. So I think ultimately, he should testify. Adam Schiff is going to prevent it in the House. In the Senate, I will be advocating that if it comes to the Senate, we haven’t had a vote yet of what the rules should be. By a simple minority, we should make the rules that the president is allowed to call all his witnesses, and then it is up to the president who he wants to call as his witnesses.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.