Archive for pornography

Jihad Pornography

Posted in uncategorized with tags , on September 28, 2020 by andelino

We keep hearing about the  “cultural enrichment” of “Islamic Muslims”

This is Florence, Italy.

“Firenze, abbiamo finito le parole.” #RadioSavana pic.twitter.com/Q1JKHpw06L — RadioSavana (@RadioSavana) July 28, 2020

And this is Rome, Italy.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/gvvp6wvPY6u7/

And this is Paris, France.

If you turn up the sound, you can hear the “Allahu Akbaring.”

https://www.bitchute.com/video/GkQlO5Z4d8xR/

But wait, there’s more from Rome, Italy:

Milan, Italy

Tarquinia, Italy

Sicily, Italy

Salerno, Italy

I know it’s warm in Italy, but I don’t think it is THAT hot! Anyway, interesting no female Muslims walking around buck naked!

I guess a sexually repressive religion and a sexually repressed culture based on that religion makes these sex starved “horny” guys snap and just unravel.

My guess is these “naked” guys were either looking for auditioning for the “Gay Parade” or perhaps for friendly “goats” to satisfy their sexual needs.

“It isn’t Islamophobia when they really ARE stripping off and doing ‘Salat’ buck naked and terrorizing Infidels with their bare ass naked bodies, especially when unfit and out of shape!”

I remember seeing a video of a woman doing “Salat” in a bikini in front of everybody on the beach. She wasn’t totally “buff naked”, but to Muslim eyes, she was totally “indecent.”

 

Maybe Muslims are discovering that “nudity” isn’t all that terrible and not really a “sin”, since Allah created them all “buck naked.”

Muslims are generally prudish and frown upon “public nudity” which makes you wonder why a devout Muslim would want to be going around in the “buff on a public street” when their religion says not to, and can suffer “floggings”, or even worse, “death” for doing so.

But I guess there are always exceptions. “Naked Jihad” maybe? “Bare Ass Jihad?” Terrorize “Kuffars” with naked ass and minuscule “shortcomings?”

I guarantee they wouldn’t be doing that in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, Afghanistan or any other hardcore Islamic fundamentalist country.

Standards have gone way down. Past “streakers” were at least “classy and good-looking” in the old days.

Imagine you’re out with your family, little kids in tow, and they have to see that filthy Muslim “behavior” in public. How do you explain that?

“Oh well you see some other people have different values” or “some people sometimes break the rules” or “some people just do not care or respect your values or rules.” Some lesson when there is no consequences at all.

You can blame all the “offenders” for their lewd behavior but we should also blame ourselves for tolerating this “scum”  and not demanding that our “civil authorities, police, courts and jails”, do what they are supposed to do.

If they don’t then the people have the ultimate right to take action. And the government officials who are “derelict” in their duties should be “incarcerated” with them, or worse, thrown of the “roof” according to Sharia Law.

Islam is its own worst enemy.

Homosexuality

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on May 27, 2020 by andelino

Did Jesus Say Anything About Homosexuality?”
By Shane Idleman

My hope is that readers will read the entire article before drawing conclusions. I have nothing but “compassion” for those trapped in “sexual” sin. Those who strongly believe in the Bible and God’s will regarding sexual “behavior” also strongly believe in unconditional “love and forgiveness.”

To say that authentic Christians “hate or fear” those trapped in the homosexual lifestyle demonstrates a gross “misunderstanding” of the Christian faith. To “confront in love” simply comes from a “desire” to honor God and to truly “love and care” for others. “The ability to relate to people on their level, show genuine concern, and love them regardless of their lifestyle is the mark of true Christianity.”

In case you don’t continue reading, let me offer some encouragement: “if you’re hopeless, depressed, and confused, look to the One who created you. He has the answers.”

No matter what you have done, you have the “ability” to turn to Christ and start anew: “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved” (Romans 10:9). “If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come” (2 Corinthians 5:17).

It’s no surprise that the church, and our nation, desperately need to hear “the voice of one crying in the wilderness” to awaken, convict, and restore. It was not so long ago that we were concerned about “the fall of America.”

America cannot fall because she has already fallen. We are now picking up the pieces of a “broken” nation reflected in our laws, lives, families, and children. America’s moral heartbeat has ceased because we cut off the source of life. We need “resuscitation, renewal, and revival of the truth.”

When people, groups, denominations, or movements “depart” from absolute truth, and thus, quench and grieve the Spirit of God, they become mechanical in their approach to Christianity and lose the ability to guide. The Word of God is not in their hearts “like a burning fire” (Jeremiah 20:9), but relative, powerless, and debatable. This is what we see today.

Unfortunately, those who are sounding the alarm are often categorized as “irrational, judgmental, bigoted, and intolerant.” But how can we warn if we won’t confront, correct if we won’t challenge, and contend if we won’t question? We must speak the truth in love…the Bible is crystal clear on “sexual sin, including homosexuality.”

Why is there a “lack of conviction” today? The reason may not be in the pew, but in the pulpit. Much depends on the “prayer life” of the preacher. Pastors, preachers, and teachers must spend extended time in “prayer” to be truly effective—God prepares the “messenger” before we prepare the message. Luther’s motto, “He that has prayed well has studied well,” rings true.

I’m convinced that the majority of the churches in America are seeking to please the “masses rather than convict.” Judgment is never mentioned; repentance is rarely sought; and sin is often excused. We want to “build” a church rather than “break” a heart; be “politically” correct rather than “biblically” correct; “coddle and comfort” rather than “stir and convict.”

This leaves people “confused and deceived” because we teach and live a form of Christianity “void of repentance and void of truth.” Consider the following in light of Jesus’ teachings…in light of the truth:

The “moral” laws in the Old Testament such as “killing, stealing, lying, adultery, sexual immorality,” and so on are all valid today. Jesus referred often to the Old Testament, and said that He didn’t come to abolish it, but to fulfill it.

Although many of the ceremonial and dietary laws of the Old Testament do not apply today, the moral laws do. They are as significant today as they have been throughout history.

For example, Leviticus 20:13 states, “If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination….” To suggest that this verse is “invalid” today is to advocate the dangerous practice of “redefining or deleting” what God has said. Jesus referred to the Old Testament often in regard to “moral behavior.”

The consequences of wrong actions may have changed, but the moral implications remain the same. For instance, even though we no longer “stone to death” those who commit adultery, this does not mean that adultery is “acceptable” or any less dangerous. Adultery is wrong even though there aren’t legal consequences.

Jesus condemned “all” sexual activity outside of marriage between a man and woman when He said, “Out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornication’s…these defile a man” (Matthew 15:19).

Jesus was implying that all sexual activity outside of marriage between a man and a woman is harmful and immoral. The word “fornication” in the Greek is porneia; where the word “pornography” comes from. We cannot say, “But I was born this way,” because we were all born to “lie, cheat, lust, and deceive,” but this doesn’t make it right…it makes us “sinful and in need of a Savior.”

An argument cannot be based solely on silence. To suggest that Jesus approved of homosexuality simply because He did not use the term “homosexual,” is to imply that He approved of “necrophilia, pedophilia, incest, and bestiality.” But, of course, we know better.

Other passage in the New Testament are clear on this issue as well. Romans 1:18-32 and 1 Corinthians 6:1-20 are good places to start. In short, mankind did not see fit to “acknowledge” God and thereby “suppressed” the truth; therefore, God gave them over to a “depraved mind” to do those things which are not proper.

Homosexual behavior, and sexual sin in general, is comparable with “dishonoring” the body and “turning” from God. “The sexual disordering of the human race is a judgment of God for exchanging Him for the creature” John Piper wrote.

Jesus said that since the beginning of creation, God created them male and female in order that they would be joined together and become one flesh. He adds, “Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate” (Mark 10:9).

Marriage between a man and a woman is God’s plan since “creation.” No matter how many laws are passed in favor of “gay marriage”, it will not change God’s mind or His Word. Mankind often “rebels” against God; this is nothing new.

In closing, Jesus would often speak out against “sin”, but His love and mercy also reached out to those who “regretted and hated” their condition. Forgiveness is a mark of “genuine” faith.

We should have “compassion” for those who struggle with “same sex attraction” because we all struggle with sin, but at the same time, we should not “condone or excuse” this type of sin any more than we condone or excuse any other sin.

Frankenstein Hack Job

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on February 8, 2020 by andelino

Frankenstein Hack Job
By Walt Heyer

Less than a year after having “gender” surgery, Nathaniel now says, “This whole thing was a bad idea. I am 19 years old, and I feel as though I have ruined my life.”

It’s heartbreaking each time reading a letter from someone who underwent “gender change” surgery and regrets it, especially someone as young as Nathaniel.

It isn’t society’s “fault” that these teenagers suffered harm. The “blame” lies with the gender clinics and the medical staff who “practice” there.

By turning a “blind eye” to the scientific and ethical aspects of their chosen profession, they are directly responsible for “poor outcomes, regret, de-transitioning, suicides, and families torn to shreds by unnecessary surgeries.”

With his permission, I’m telling a bit of his story to “raise” awareness of the young lives being “ruined” by the rush to surgery, and hoping that hearing the testimony of this young man will “influence” others on this path to slow down and consider the “consequences” before consenting to surgery.

In Nathaniel’s case, he says he was “bullied” by the boys in elementary school because he was “sensitive” and preferred playing “girl” games. When he was a bit older, he discovered internet “pornography,” heard about “transgenderism” and as he says,“convinced myself that’s what I was.”

When he finally worked up the nerve to tell his mother in the summer after eighth grade, she made an appointment with, in his words, “a doctor at an informed consent clinic.”

He started seeing the doctor a week after his 15th birthday, and from how he describes the next years of his teens, I’d say going to the clinic didn’t improve his life.

“From then on. I slowly detached from everything until I was just staying home, playing video games, and going on the internet all day. I stopped reading, drawing, riding my bicycle. I surrounded myself in an echo chamber that supported and validated my poor decisions, because the others were also, unfortunately, stuck in that pit, too,” he said.

A month after his 18th birthday, Nathaniel had what’s euphemistically called “bottom surgery.” For a male like Nathaniel, that means refashioning the “male genitalia into a pseudo-vagina.” He suffered some complications that required a “second” surgery a few months later, and he had “facial” surgery to further “feminize” his appearance.

Nine months later, he says:

“Now that I’m all healed from the surgeries, I regret them. The result of the bottom surgery looks like a Frankenstein hack job at best, and that got me thinking critically about myself. I had turned myself into a plastic-surgery facsimile of a woman, but I knew I still wasn’t one. I became, and to an extent, still feel, deeply depressed.”

The unpopular “truth”, which Nathaniel unfortunately learned the hard way at a young age, “is a man is not a woman and can’t ever become a woman, even with surgically refashioned genitals and feminizing facial surgery.”

Nathaniel is a bright young man who never had the “benefit” of sound, effective counseling, which would have “prevented” this horrible mistake from happening. He will “deal” with it for the rest of his life.

No one will help this young man to “de-transition.” The so-called “informed-consent clinic,” as if a teenager can give informed consent, washed their hands of him. The reckless “ideology” claimed another life.

Nathaniel’s story is not unique. Specifics may vary, but I’ve found that everyone who “regrets” can point to something that happened that caused them to “not want to be who they are and attempt to become someone else.”

For Nathaniel, “what happened” was bullying about not being male and viewing pornography on the internet. When he sought help in his “distress”, the transgender ideology and the gender clinic and surgeons affirmed his “false” thinking and enticed him down the “primrose” path.

Another young person with a story of “medical malpractice” I’ve come to know is Sydney Wright. Born female, Sydney “transitioned,” also at age 18. Now 21, she recently told her story: “I Spent a Year as a Trans Man. Doctors Failed Me at Every Turn.”

She clearly articulates the absence of “counseling” prior to being prescribed the powerful male hormone “testosterone” and the horrible effects taking it for even a short time had on her female body.

As more and more people seek help from gender clinics, we’re seeing a tidal wave of those who regret sex change. So many contact me that I wrote a book with 30 of their stories, “Trans Life Survivors.”

In an article, “Observations in a Gender Diversity Clinic,” published in Ethics and Medics, Dr. Monique Robles, a board-certified “pediatric critical care” physician, observed that children and adolescents are put on the path to “puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and sex reassignment surgery” at gender clinics, but receive no “psychological” counseling.

She says that this “practice” is widespread and growing among “gender” clinics, even though a review of the medical literature shows that none of this “treatment regimen is supported by strong scientific evidence.”

The reckless gender medical practitioners have “blood” on their hands. Both Sydney’s and Nathaniel’s young bodies bear the penalties.

We should be outraged at doctors and surgeons who carve up “distraught” people, especially teens, and leave them looking like, as Nathaniel says, “Frankenstein hack jobs.”

National public outcry is a powerful force, as we saw in the custody case of Jeff Younger in Texas. We need to support all who are battling the “destructive practice of transitioning children.”

Nathaniel will need proper medical care to get his life back and funds to pursue legal action, if indicated. If you’d like to help, visit sexchangeregret.com and contact me.

The good news for both Nathaniel and Sydney is that they are revitalizing their “faith” in Jesus and, as I know well from my lifetime of “transgender” experience, faith in God leads to “restoration” if we allow it.

Walt Heyer is an author and public speaker. Through his website, SexChangeRegret.com and his blog, WaltHeyer.com, Heyer raises public awareness about those who regret gender change and the tragic consequences suffered as a result.

Porn Watchdogs

Posted in sex with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on July 8, 2014 by andelino

Porn Watchdogs 02
Have I got a “job” for you!

More than 4,000 Chinese citizens have applied to be “porn watchdogs” or “sexual content appraisers” as Internet companies create new “jobs” to comply with a new government “crackdown” on Internet “pornography.”

The job description requires “porn watchdogs” to be between the “ages” of 20 and 35; they can be “male or female”, and receive “compensation” for up to $32,000 a year, Want China Times reported.

The job location to stamp out “yellow” content, as porn is “euphemistically” referred to in China, is in Beijing.

These new jobs have been “created” by Chinese Internet companies like “Baidu, Tencent and Kingsoft” in an attempt to better “comply” with the government’s latest “crackdown” part of new so-called “Clean Internet Campaign 2014.”

The job includes evaluating “pictures, videos and other kinds of content” online to determine if it runs “afoul” of the new regulations, which outlaws not just “porn” but also “erotic or sexually” suggestive content, such as young women or even cartoons wearing “sleeveless shirts, shorts or bikinis.”

Porn Watchdogs 01

But the job isn’t necessarily as “fun” as it might sound.

“When I do the appraisal, all I am thinking about is whether the content meets the standards for sexual content, or whether the content in the video or disc is publicly advertising sex, or showing sex,” said Liu Chunqi, a police officer who works as a “porn watchdog” in the city of Harbin, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

“Some people think it’s just watching porn, but it’s not. Sometimes it makes me throw up.”

Really? How about you “toughen” up, bro? Pretty sure you didn’t even have to get to that “portion of the video” to figure out it was gonna “need to be blocked.”

Porn Watchdogs 06

The Chinese government has already “shut down” numerous websites as part of the “anti-porn” campaign, which experts believe is just another “attempt” from the Chinese government to “control” the Internet.

One Sina Weibo commentator said that evaluating what is “smut and what is not” is difficult.

“Judging what’s is pornographic in literature is hard; you can’t use ‘one size fits all’ and simply ban words like ‘prostitute’ or ‘sex’,” wrote He Guoqiang Tanchou.

“We are a conservative country, and we don’t refer to some sensitive topics, but it doesn’t mean all obscure things are trash and poisonous cancer.”

Porn Watchdogs 04

Websites or portals can receive “large” fines if they allow “pornographic” content within their services.

Chinese authorities “fined” the Internet giant Sina, which owns Sina Weibo (a.k.a. “China’s Twitter”), for hosting “unhealthy and indecent content.” The company received a fine of 5.1 million yuan ($815,038), according to Reuters.

The government also “stripped” Sina of some online publication “licenses”, which experts “feared” would happen under the new “anti-porn” regulations.

Michael Carbone, the manager of “tech policy and programs” at human rights organization “Access”, and an expert in China’s Internet “freedom” issues, previously told Mashable that China’s new “crackdown” on porn would establish “easy political justifications to take down websites and revoke licenses to operate.”

Porn Watchdogs 05

There’s no way the people “applying” for these jobs are “super straight laced, upstanding” Chinese citizens who are “grossed” out by porn.

For sure it’s the “smut” peddlers and “smut” watchers.

Probably gonna have to yell “hand check” every ten minutes in that place to make sure those weirdo’s aren’t getting off to a “crush” video or some “tentacle” porn.

Porn Watchdogs 03

All that being said, who’s watching the “watchers” in China?

Can an Android App Defeat China’s Internet Censors?
Watchdog Finds EPA Worker Viewed Porn 2-6 Hours a Day

%d bloggers like this: