Archive for pete buttigieg

Roads And Bridges

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on November 12, 2021 by andelino

That highways were deliberately built to separate whites from blacks, and that the overpasses were built too low so that busses with black and Latino children wouldn’t make it to the beach is NOT a conspiracy theory.

It’s clear as day that it’s better to blow up and rebuild hundreds of overpasses in New York State with the hands of the union workers whose children will pay this bill when they grow up.

As a child growing up in New York City, I took part in several community summer programs that took poor inner city kids to museums, parks, woodlands and beaches. We traveled by bus and had no trouble whatsoever going to any public beach at all—ever. And we were of all races and many ethnicities.

This gay Buttigieg blather about inaccessible tunnels and overpasses to prevent minorities from getting to beaches is not a conspiracy theory, it’s utter bullshit and anyone who says otherwise is a lying “asshat race baiter” from the grievance industry.

My experience as a slum resident is that the neighborhood always has one or more disgruntled, loud-mouthed, no-nothing self-declared, unemployed “activist” who dedicates his or her waking hours to spreading hateful, unfounded rumors with no basis in reality.

After awhile, these rumors spread and becomes urban legend, added to a growing list of grudges and simmering mythical grievances.

Then the press and/or government officials finds one of these “representatives” of the “Color Community” and adulates him or her as a true speaker for “the community” as if we’re all a unified bloc in mental lockstep.

That’s how jack-legged, tax cheat scoundrels like Al Sharpton end up “fat and famous” and that’s how urban legends become multi-billion dollar boondoggles.

Just found this example of a virtue-signaling liberal journalist’s unsolicited pontification on behalf of the “Color Community.”

It’s Now Racist to Say ‘Woke’ if You’re Not Black…or Something

War on the Middle Class

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , on October 8, 2021 by andelino

In the seven months “Fraud-In-Chief “ Joe Biden has been in the White House, America has changed, as evidenced by the border crises, the debacle in Afghanistan, and skyrocketing inflation. However, there has been one consistent theme to the current administration’s policies.

Justin Haskins wrote at the Hill: “Policymakers now seem more focused than ever on finding ways to get government funds into the hands of able-bodied middle-income earners—and middle-income Americans are gladly taking the bait.” There has been a deliberately engineered policy targeted at the middle class, especially over the past seven months.

While losing the wars abroad, Joe Biden has been waging a systematic war against middle-class America. This campaign of disaster is fulfilling Barack Obama’s vision to radically transform America. To complete the Communist takeover, the middle class needs to be dependent on the government.

The Communist Manifesto, by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, outlines the means by which a capitalist nation may become a Communist paradise. “The Communist Manifesto is considered the ‘sacred text’ of communism. It stresses the need for a total overthrow of existing governments.” Communism divides society into economic classes. The proletariat (working class) would rise up against the bourgeoisie (middle class) and the ruling class.

At its core, the manifesto attacks the right to own private property, which is one of the rights enshrined in the Constitution. It claims the bourgeoisie exploit the proletariat through collecting rent and owning businesses: “No sooner has the laborer received his wages in cash, then he is set upon by the other portions of the bourgeoisie, the landlord, the shopkeeper, the pawnbroker, etc.”

The middle class control the property and means of production that Communists need to create a dictatorship. They also stand in the way of the violent insurrection by the proletariat. The manifesto was written in 19th-century language. In modern America, the radical left consider the proletariat to be racial minorities and those dependent on the welfare state. The middle class are landlords, business owners and financially independent. Notice this chilling passage from The Communist Manifesto:

“You must, therefore, confess that by ‘individual” you mean no other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of property. This person must, indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible. Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labor of others by means of such appropriation.”

Marx and Engels believed for communism to become a reality, the middle class had to be swept out of the way! Communists believe taking away rights and freedoms is the path to equity, not tyranny.

Communists are “perverting our morals, sabotaging our educational system, wrecking our social structure, destroying our spiritual and religious life, weakening our industrial and economic power, demoralizing our armed forces, and finally, after such infiltration, overthrowing our government by force and violence! All this clearly disguised as a harmless political party! Communism is a worldwide psychological warfare!”

It is a matter of record that Communists have infiltrated our educational system. They are perverting our morals, destroying our spiritual and religious life, weakening our industrial and economic power, and demoralizing our armed forces. They have even gained control of the government through the radical left. And they are actively working to wreck our social structure: to destroy the middle class to amass property, wealth and the means of production so they can be centrally controlled.

The United States Senate recently passed a $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation bill. To fund this massive spending spree, Biden promised to not raise taxes on the middle class. However, that is already proving to be a lie. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg announced in March that to help fund the bill a mileage tax would be considered. The blogger Sundance at Conservative Treehouse commented:

“The middle class commutes to work much more than all other sectors. Any increase in gas prices, gasoline taxes or mileage taxes hits the blue-collar worker at a disproportionate rate. A proposal to install a mileage tax does nothing but add another cost onto the American middle class.”

President Donald Trump’s economist, Larry Kudlow, told Newsmax: “It’s going to be a minimum of $3 trillion in taxes, and the middle class is going to pay for that—virtually every nickel.” Biden has promised to increase corporate taxes to pay for the “human infrastructure” vision in the bill. However, most “corporate taxes” are actually paid by middle-class Americans.

Citing the Joint Committee on taxation, Kudlow said that about 70 percent of corporate taxes are paid by those who earn $500,000 or less. “And the bulk of that group,” Kudlow said, “is not $500,000; the bulk of that group is $50-$75,000 to $200,000, because that’s where the money is.”

These tax increases will come as crushing inflation sweeps across the nation. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that during July, the U.S. saw a 10 percent increase in food prices, 23 percent increase in energy prices, and 43 percent increase in the price of regular unleaded gasoline. These rocketing prices for necessary goods have decimated middle-class family incomes. Sundance wrote in another article:

“The White House responds to inflation by saying the Biden administration is attempting to directly subsidize the middle-class inflation they are creating by giving Americans money to pay for higher prices through covid bailouts. The White House solution is to create dependency on the government for income. This is exactly intended as government subsidies are used to keep the pitchforks at bay and simultaneously keep people dependent on government to sustain themselves expand the political base.”

That is the aim of the war on the middle class: create dependency on the welfare state. The U.S. government has given the middle class $1,400 stimulus checks, but inflation has raised the average expenses to double the stimulus amount. With the administration saying inflation will “slow down next year,” more stimulus checks will likely be on the way.

“Fraud-In-Chief” Biden has already approved a 25 percent increase to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits (previously known as food stamps). Forty-two million Americans—1 in every 8—rely on food stamps. SNAP is subsidized by taxpayers (including the middle class) and this will probably drive food inflation higher. Stephen Greene at PJ Media writes: “A 25 percent snap bump is just the beginning. As inflation grows, so too will demands for increased payouts for disability, Social Security and more assistance for anyone on a fixed income.”

The radical left has been baiting the middle class into this dependency trap for decades. In 2018, it was reported that 46.8 percent of government safety net payments were doled out to the middle class. What has been the root cause of this trend? CBS reported in 2018:

The culprit? In a term: health care. As costs of medical care have continued to march upward, the safety net has gotten bigger, modestly, to subsidize some of them. Medicaid expanded in the 1990’s and again under the Affordable Care Act, which also created subsidies for middle-income people to buy health insurance.

ObamaCare has been the main driver to making the middle class more dependent on the government safety net. Biden’s war on the middle class is only continuing Obama’s war on the middle class, but it has intensified in its ferocity.

What has exposed this intention most clearly is the unconstitutional extension of the eviction moratorium. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) extended the moratorium on August 4 in defiance of the Constitution and the ruling of the Supreme Court. This put millions of landowners in the difficult position of paying their mortgages while not collecting rent from tenants. Yet at the same time, 9 million jobs were available.

“Biden and the radical left are consolidating their power. They are weakening and bankrupting middle-class Americans, worsening the divisions in our society, and moving us away from the rule of law and toward the rule of whoever grabs power.”

The middle class makes up 52 percent of America’s population. By making the middle class poor, it will make them dependents of the state. By destroying land owners and landlords, the radical left targets those who have the means of resisting their agenda.

This plan has been carefully and meticulously prepared. On the surface, it can appear to be caused by incompetence, but it is deliberate. Who has been the architect of this war on the middle class? Barack Obama.

Barack Obama was a self-avowed Marxist in college. His administration tried to govern America like a Communist dictatorship as much as possible. Now his vice president is continuing his work by trying to crush middle-class landowners out of existence and create a huge lower class completely dependent on the government.

The final stage of the Communist plan is to control the “lower class.” This can either be accomplished through making the majority of Americans dependent on the government or, if necessary, through violence and social unrest.

The bottom line is the Communist campaign is to destroy economic independence.

Biden’s Bloodthirsty Hounds

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on June 24, 2021 by andelino

Fraud-In-Chief Joe Biden’s renegade dog Major could be primed to unleash a reign of terror following the death of Champ, the elder and much-better-behaved German Shepherd widely believed to be the only thing keeping the vicious Major at bay. 

Experts largely agreed that Champ, who died at the age of 13, was a good boy. But even his statesmanlike demeanor was not enough to stop the three-year-old Major from attacking government employees and defecating inside the White House. With Champ out of the picture, there’s no telling what Major will do next.

“As the beta dog in the White House, Major stuck to biting park rangers,” said Dr. Patrick Ames, director of the Weller Institute of Canine Psychology. “Now that he’s the alpha, we should expect a much more aggressive streak to emerge,” Ames told the Washington Free Beacon. “There will be blood.”

The Biden’s sent Major to Delaware for “training” in early March after the dog attacked a member of White House security. He “returned” to Pennsylvania Avenue in mid-March, only to attack a National Park Service employee days later. The injury, which the First Lady’s office described as a “nip,” was severe enough to require medical attention.

Some believe Major’s aggressive nature casts a concerning light on Champ’s untimely demise.

“As with authoritarian leaders and Mafiosi, German Shepherds have been known to claw their way to the top by any means necessary,” said Becca Davis, senior fellow at the Schneider Center for Alsatian Power. “Major wouldn’t be the first Deutschlander to engineer a contemporary’s demise in order to consolidate power.”

Nor would it be Major’s first attempt at a White House coup. In November 2020, then-president-elect Biden fractured his right foot while “playing” with Major after “getting out of the shower.” While the AARP reported that falls and fractures are common in men of Biden’s advanced age, sources close to the matter tell that the “incident” was far from playful.

“Look, the man rides his Peloton every single day,” said the source, who wished to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation. “Do you really think he’d just fall playing with a dog? Wake up! Something funny’s going on here.”D.C.’s most prominent canines are scrambling to respond to the shifting power dynamic in the White House.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D., N.Y.) French bulldog Deco is holed up in her luxury Navy Yard apartment, leaving only for Tesla trips to the neighborhood Whole Foods.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D., Mass.) golden retriever Bailey, best known for stealing strangers’ burritos, was recently found to be 1/64th German Shepherd and is reportedly trying to secure an alliance with Major.

Truman and Buddy Buttigieg, known sycophants who congratulated Champ and Major on Twitter after Biden’s election, did not return a request for comment.

Truman and Buddy Buttigieg

Not everyone in Washington is worried about Major’s untimely rise to “hound” power.

“Champ was stuck in the past, but Major has all four paws pointed toward the future,” said Troy Beauregard , senior fellow in Siamese cat studies at the Quincy Institute. “We’re optimistic that Major will push the Biden administration to a more prudent position on U.S.-China relations.”

At press time, Major was last seen strolling the grounds of the Naval Observatory and discussing the 2024 presidential election with cackling Kamala “Ho” Harris.

Gay Pete Goes to Washington

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on January 3, 2021 by andelino

President-elect Joe Biden is expected to nominate 38-year-old Pete Buttigieg for “Secretary of Transportation”, a move that will delight a core segment of the Democratic base.

Buttigieg, a 38-year-old serial memoirist and former mayor of the fourth-largest city, South Bend in Indiana, ran for president in 2020 despite having no relevant qualifications.

He did, however, establish himself as the preferred choice among wealthy white liberals with graduate degrees, and the last choice among minority voters of every income bracket and education level.

Buttigieg’s support was particularly prevalent in the boat shoe strongholds of Martha’s Vineyard, Nantucket, and Cape Cod, leading some analysts to conclude that his primary campaign was the whitest presidential campaign since Mitt Romney’s in 2012.

He is often referred to as the “white Obama.”

Buttigieg’s experience in the field of transportation includes spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on private air travel during the 2020 primary. As mayor of South Bend, Ind., he oversaw the repaving of a small segment of road in front of his house and helped implement a bike-share program.

During the primary, Biden’s campaign mocked Buttigieg’s record as a small town mayor in a brutal digital ad that has since been removed from the internet, for obvious reasons.

Buttigieg will be the second openly gay man to serve in a top administration post. President Donald J. Trump’s former director of national intelligence, Richard Grenell, was the first.

One thing is for sure. Gay Pete won’t be traveling in his capacity as “Secretary of Transportation” to any Muslin nation due to Sharia laws.

Introducing the man slated to run the Department of Transportation
Biden mocks Buttigieg’s mayoral accomplishments in new campaign ad

Renaming Body Parts

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on February 24, 2020 by andelino

The Human Rights Campaign Foundation has published a “Safer Sex for Trans Bodies” guide, and the folks at the foundation have decided to “rename” male and female genitalia.

It seems that women who were born female with a “Vagina” are now said to have a “Front Hole” while trans-women who have had the “Penis” removed by surgery are now proclaimed to have a “Vagina.”

The Human Rights Campaign Foundation’s guide also has tips on masturbation, a section titled, “SCREWING, SHAGGING OR MATTRESS DANCING,” and one on safe sex “without barriers.”

Here are two tweets by women who are now said to have “Front Holes” on this subject.

For clarification purpose only, please note that “Back Hole” or “Pie Hole” are body parts exclusively reserved for gays like Anderson Cooper, Don Lemon, Pete Buttigieg and Bathhouse Barry Obama, just to mention a few.

Religious Left

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , on February 22, 2020 by andelino

Despite liberals frequently referencing God, the Bible, and Jesus, there is no “Religious Left.”

It is an oxymoron because the two “sets of belief systems” are mutually exclusive.

The Bible speaks of such people, Paul wrote, “They claim to know God, but by their actions they deny him. They are detestable, disobedient and unfit for doing anything good.” Titus 1:16 NIV.

Bible believing “Jesus” followers must not be “confused” merely by a person’s quoting of “Scripture,” remember Satan himself quoted Scripture to Jesus during the “temptation” and frequently twists it in today’s society to “deceive” Christians who do not yet have a “firm foundation in God’s word.”

Today’s leftists stand for the “opposite” of what the Bible teaches on major issues.

Throughout the Bible “theft and stealing” are sins that are prohibited. Yet the left’s position today is for “exorbitant” taxation and for “unconstitutional” purposes, which is “legalized” theft.

The left’s focus on raising taxes to fund all manner of “illegitimate” programs is wrong any way you measure it. Jesus never taught to “steal from those who work to give to the poor.” He taught that “charity” is a private matter which individuals do – not the government.

He taught in words and by example that “giving” is evinced by voluntary “compassionate” acts and not coercive “stealing” from some to give to others.

Biblically speaking, all “provisions” a person requires should be “worked” for or received from those who “choose” to give to them willingly. Jesus taught us to “help” those in need; his teachings were instructions to “individuals.” Those in need were not to be “politically exploited” but voluntarily helped by Bible believing “Jesus” followers, not the government.

In Ephesians 4:28 NIV, we are told, “Anyone who has been stealing must steal no longer, but must work, doing something useful with their own hands, that they may have something to share with those in need.

For the liberals of today, man is the measure on all matters – not God. Jesus said, “You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you: These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely human rules.” Matthew 15:7-9 NIV.

Leftists’ positions on abortion, self-defense, firearms, immigration, the pursuit of anti-family and anti-religious policies, and support of special rights for those engaging in sin” are all examples of putting the “mind” of man above the “word” of God.

The Bible does not teach situational “ethics” where people try to figure out what is right “without” God, it teaches God’s ethics. An authentic Bible believing “Jesus” follower evinces the “values” taught in the Bible in all areas of life, including politics.

Sadly, many “churches and religious groups” have insidiously been infiltrated by “Marxist” ideology, craftily “selecting” parts of the Bible they like to buttress a “radical” agenda while “ignoring” the bulk of Scripture and “spirit” of God’s law. They’ve intertwined “secularism” into their supposed Christian belief “distorting” it into an abominable evil.

The “political and religious” left is far away from the Bible teachings of “Jesus.” Their reference to religious “faith” is as empty as their “destructive” political policies.

To those who consider themselves members of the “Religious Left” I leave you with a question posed by Jesus Christ, “Why do you call me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say?” Luke 6:46 NIV.

One such hypocrite is “gay” Pete Buttigieg who plays the “Religious Left” card frequently to “pander” to voters, but like a good Democrat he “cherry-picks” what he believes in depending on when it’s “convenient” for him.

Pete Buttigieg attacked President Trump’s Christian supporters during his CNN town hall because he can’t seem to understand how Bible believing “Jesus” followers support President Trump.

“Well, I’m not going to tell other Christians how to be Christians. But I will say, I cannot find any compatibility between the way this president conducts himself and anything that I find in scripture. Now I guess that’s my interpretation but I think that’s a lot of people’s interpretation and that interpretation deserves a voice,” homosexual Pete stated.

One of the most “irritating” pandering about Buttigieg is his ability to play the “Religious Left” card, yet Romans 1:24-27 NIV talks explicitly about “homosexuality”:

Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.”

Buttigieg also plays the “Religious Left” card supporting “abortion and infanticide” even though babies are continually mentioned as a “reward” in the Bible, as evidenced is Psalm 127:3-5 NIV :

“Children are a heritage from the Lord, offspring a reward from him. Like arrows in the hands of a warrior are children born in one’s youth. Blessed is the man whose quiver is full of them. They will not be put to shame when they contend with their opponents in court.” 

Buttigieg has told a “pro-life” democrat the there is “no room in his party” for people who believe “all human life is precious.” He took his pro-abortion “extremism” a step further by completely supporting “infanticide.”

According to him, it is a woman’s decision if she wants to “kill a baby after it has been born” and the government has no right to stop her.

He’s literally running for president on a platform that “murdering babies after birth” is neat and okay, while as a “homosexual” himself, he never will experience the “joy of giving birth” to anything.

Buttigieg was on “The View” and co-host Meghan McCain wanted some clarification on his “abortion” position. She brought up a democrat in Iowa who asked if there was any room in the democratic party for “pro-lifers” like her.

Buttigieg told the woman she didn’t belong in the new “radical” democratic party. From there, McCain asked about Buttigieg’s extremist baby-killing position.

“This is your quote: There a lot of parts of the Bible that talk about how life begins with breath so even that is something we can interpret differently. It obviously, in my circles, was passed around everywhere because I think the interpretation from pro-life people like me was that you meant a baby actually being born,” McCain quoted.

McCain then brought up Virginia Governor Ralph Northam who went on the record of 100% supporting killing babies after they had been born. The question posed of Buttigieg was, do you “support” infanticide? Here was his answer:

“We live in a country in which it is extremely important that no one person have to be subject to another person’s interpretation of their own religion. So that’s a definite yes on the infanticide thing,” said Buttigieg.

McCain gave Buttigieg a chance to change his “horrible” answer. She again brought up Ralph Northam’s love of “infanticide” and asked Buttigieg, “I want to know where your line is.”

“My point is, it shouldn’t be up to a government official to draw the line. It should be up to the woman who is confronted with the choice,” replied Buttigieg.

McCain gave Buttigieg one more “chance” to not be a complete monster. “To invoke infanticide after a baby was born, you’d be comfortable with that?” McCain asked.

“I just know that I trust her and her decision medically or morally isn’t going to be any better because the government is commanding her to do it in a certain way,” replied Buttigieg.

Wow. Buttigieg was asked three times if he’s okay with “killing a baby after it has been born” and 3 times he confirmed he’s a “big fan of infanticide.” Maybe the first time he didn’t understand the question, but by 2 and 3 he knew damn well what he was giving the “thumbs” up to.

He absolutely, without question, believes it’s perfectly fine to “murder a baby that has been born and taken its first breath outside the womb.”  

My  question is: “how long after a baby is born does Pete Buttigieg think it’s cool to murder a baby?”

Though he looks like he’s 12-years-old, Buttigieg is actually 38. If his mother suddenly decided “today” she was ashamed of her “gay ghoulish” son, would Pete support her decision to “murder” him subsequently?

Does he think the government has “no business” telling his mother she can’t hit him in the “back of the head” with some double ought buckshot?

The scary thing here is, Buttigieg is considered kind of a moderate in the democratic party. His extremist views on “baby killing and infanticide” is now on the mild side of democratic party “extremism.”

Buttigieg further plays the “Religious Left” card supporting “illegal” immigrants even though the Bible says those in “authority” positions are appointed by God as described in Romans 13:1-7 NIV:

“Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience. This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God’s servants, who give their full time to governing. Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.” 

Buttigieg says government health care for illegal immigrants is “one of the pillars” of his plan.

It’s easy to see that Buttigieg is “obsessed” with religion because he worries that his chosen “homosexual” lifestyle is incompatible with the Bible as written.

To this end, he rewrites the Bible to comport with social “Marxism” and then works to gain “salvation” by selling the American people on his “Religious Left”  evangelism.

The “Religious Left” is far away from the teachings of authentic Bible believing “Jesus” followers. Their reference to “religious faith” is as empty as their sorrowful, destructive “political” policies.

Pete Buttigieg is running as the great Christian savior of America
Christian Nationalism? The Left’s Latest Attempt to Silence Believers
There Will Be No Religious Left
Don’t Bet On The Emergence Of A ‘Religious Left’
The New Christian Left Is Twisting the Gospel
First Gay Gentleman

First Gay Gentleman

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on February 17, 2020 by andelino

“Butt Pirate” Chasten and “Butt Plug” Pete Buttigieg pronounced (“Boot-edge-edge”).

Ever since his husband, “Butt Plug” Pete Buttigieg announced his candidacy for president, “Butt Pirate” Chasten Buttigieg has been charming many political “followers” either in person, on the campaign trail, or on social media with “gay” images.

In a new profile by the Washington Post on the man who hopes to become the nation’s “First Gay Gentleman” “Butt Pirate” Chasten shares some of the challenges he’s faced in his 29 years.

“Butt Pirate” Chasten has grabbed people’s attention not just because he might be the “spouse” of the first Democratic “gay” White House hopeful “pedophile,” although that does factor in. But he’s also a “millennial” married to a “millennial.” And, he and “Butt Plug” Pete have only been married less than a year.

A “millennial” married to a “millennial.”

According to the profile, “Butt Pirate” Chasten grew up in a typical conservative Midwestern family. His parents, Sherri and Terry Glezman, worked hard to make ends meet while raising Chasten and his two older brothers, Rhyan and Dustin.

But, while his brothers liked to play “sports and go hunting,” Chasten admits he was happier reading “Harry Potter” or singing “Celine Dion” at the top of his lungs while helping his mother doing “housework.”

By the time he got to high school, he realized there was something “different” about him. Although he didn’t come “out of the closet” at the time, he admits there were no openly “gay” students at his school, but he often was the target of “bullies” who called him “homophobic slurs” and would physically try to “assault” him.

So when the opportunity came up for “Butt Pirate” Chasten to spend his senior year of high school abroad in Germany, he took it. “The further away I could get, the safer I felt,” he told the Post. It was during that year he began to confide his “secret desires” to others in the exchange program. And by the time he returned to his home town, his “free will choice” became “his truth.”

“Butt Pirate” Chasten opened up to some friends during the summer after graduation, receiving mixed responses. Some said they loved him and it “didn’t” matter; but others told him while they loved him it “did” matter.

In recounting the coming out process, he shares that one friend brought up God and implored him to change his mind, but “It was my free will choice, I had decided to do this,” Chasten said.

His family got the “news” last. Being a “pansy ass” he found he couldn’t say the words out loud, so he “wrote a letter” to his parents and “handed” it to them in their living room. “I remember my mom crying. And the first thing she asked me was if I was sick. I think she meant, like, did I have AIDS?” he recalls.

“Butt Pirate” Chasten recalls a silence loomed over home life, although he remembers at one point one of his brothers said, “No brother of mine…” Feeling like an outcast, he “decided” to leave home. With his packed bags, he bounced from one friend’s “couch” to another; sometimes he “slept” in his car in the parking lot of the community college he was attending.

After some months, though, his mother called and asked him to come home. He says, “I cried, and I went home immediately.” Over time his parents came to terms with his “gay lifestyle” and even walked him down the aisle at his wedding to “Butt Plug” Pete.

But, his brothers were another story. Rhyan Glezman, currently a pastor of a church in Clio, Michigan, told the Post that Chasten’s coming out wasn’t a “surprise,” and that he loves his youngest brother. While he wants the best for Chasten, he admits, “I just don’t support the gay lifestyle.”

Chasten would go on to earn a degree from the University of Wisconsin in “theater and global” studies, eventually working at a “Youth Theater Academy” in Milwaukee. But even with a full schedule he didn’t have “benefits.” So, he got a second job ”slinging” coffee and lattes 20 hours a week at a Starbucks to get “health” insurance.

The Starbucks “gig” led to his moving to Chicago. And it was while living in the Windy City that he met “Butt Plug” Pete on the dating app “Hinge.” A few weeks of “Face Time” chats with “gay” Pete “convinced” Chasten to make the drive to nearby South Bend for some fudge making “try outs,” and the rest, as they say, is history.

“Butt Pirate” Chasten says he laughed when “Butt Plug” Pete first broached the subject of “running” for president. But it quickly turned into total “support” for the idea.

He shares that the “campaign trail” is trying on many levels. Having lost 20 pounds since the holidays, he finds he’s worn out at the end of most days from what he calls “vulnerability fatigue. You put yourself out there so much. And we’ve invited the world to scrutinize us,” he admits.

While not much of the country is interested in the first “gay” presidential contender with “zero” election probability, there are “homophobic, nasty letters” that arrive at their home.

But the Buttigieg’s just keep moving forward. “It’s just so important to go out there and do a good job right now. Because for the first time in many people’s lives, they see someone on a national scale that makes them say, Oh, that’s me, too,” he tells the Post.

Once Trump’s wife Melania is out of the White House and hopeful “Butt Plug” Pete is in, the new “First Gay Gentleman” can once again “grace” the covers of America’s glossy women’s magazines, just as “Michael Obama” did back when “Barack Obama” was in the White House.

No more “feminine” Melania’s for the “Main Street Media” to ignore. A new “First Gay Family” will share their “butt itching” passions publicly for the first time since Al Gore “sucked” the skin off his wife’s face.

Poor Tipper had no choice getting “face raped” by hubby Al. Look at Tipper’s “throat” in the picture, she is almost “gagging!”

The Bible says God created “Adam and Eve.” He did not create “Chasten and Pete.” I always suspected that getting one’s “rump humped” causes brain damage. Here’s the proof.

“Butt Plug” Buttigieg incoherently concluded that “taking out a bad guy is not a good idea if you do not know what you’re doing.” While admitting that “terrorist” Qasem Soleimani deserved “death,” he insisted President Trump does not deserve the “credit” for taking out the Iranian leader because there is “no proof” that this made America safer.

What kind of stupid “homosexual” loser complains about taking out the “terrorist” mastermind of a country and culture that “exterminated gays?”

This is what “living on your knees” like “Butt Plug” Pete does to your “brains.” Anyone who votes for this “perverted” moron, or any of the liberal Dems, deserves the “bankruptcy, cancer, and terrorism” their policies will bring.

“Butt Pirate” Chasten has said he would be called the “First Gay Gentleman,” which means sodomite “Butt Plug” Pete would be known as the “First Lady” doing the nursing.

I met “Butt Plug” Pete a while back in South Bend at a bar ordering a drink and he approached me from behind and asked “May I push your stool in sir”? I politely declined.

I have a hard time “addressing” a couple in the Whitehouse as Mr. and Mr. “Pickle Puffers.” I just can’t do it.

And to think of “Lincoln’s” bedroom possibly being “used” for….well….well…never mind…whatever…“it makes me cringe.”

Wow! So “Butt Plug” Pete will be America’s first openly “gay leather” rebel presidential candidate. Our sky is turning red while “Butt Pirate” Chasten turns on the “butt itching” power. We’re all gonna need shades.

Pete Buttigieg Defend Infanticide Abortion
Pete unmasked as a Bernie Sanders-socialist sympathizer
Buttigieg: Heroin Possession Won’t Be Illegal Under My Administration
Buttigieg, the evasive chameleon

Pete Buttigieg Taunts God

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , on December 15, 2019 by andelino

“Gay” South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg “implied” those who oppose the minimum wage “taunt” the Creator who said in Leviticus 20:13 “If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.”

Are those who “oppose” raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour “transgressing” the Scripture and “mocking” the Lord God Almighty?

One might get that impression when Democratic presidential “wannabee” Pete Buttigieg offered his exegesis of Proverbs 14:31“Whoever oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God.”

“And so-called conservative Christian senators right now in the Senate are blocking a bill to raise the minimum wage, when Scripture says that whoever oppresses the poor taunts their Maker” claimed sinner Buttigieg.

While it is commendable that presidential candidates are “encouraging” voters to think about the intersection between “faith and economics” Pete’s proposal is not near where they converge.

The Old Testament, which Buttigieg cites, primarily defines “oppressing the poor as refusing to pay their wages.”

Deuteronomy 24:14-15 says, “Do not take advantage of a hired worker who is poor and needy, whether that worker is a fellow Israelite or a foreigner residing in one of your towns. Pay them their wages each day before sunset, because they are poor and are counting on it. Otherwise they may cry to the Lord against you, and you will be guilty of sin.

Another form of “oppression” consisted of failing to provide a uniform level of justice in Leviticus 19:13-15: “Do not defraud or rob your neighbor. Do not hold back the wages of a hired worker overnight. Do not curse the deaf or put a stumbling block in front of the blind, but fear your God. I am the Lord. Do not pervert justice; do not show partiality to the poor or favoritism to the great, but judge your neighbor fairly.”

Rulers were not to “favor” the rich or take “bribes,” nor were they to “show favoritism to a poor person in a lawsuit” according to Exodus 23:3.

The Bible knows of “no minimum wage provision.” And although it is not primarily economic, Jesus’ Parable of the “Laborers in the Vineyard” concludes with the landowner telling workers who are disgruntled over their pay, “Don’t I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?“ according to Matthew 20:15.

The rate of “wages and remuneration” deemed “biblical” is not so clear cut that one should begin hurling “anathemas” over it. The “minimum wage” is a prudential issue commended to those who are both “thoughtful and faithful.”

There are at least “four” reasons raising the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, as Buttigieg advocates, is likely to have “harmful” effects.

First, “It increases unemployment.” The “Raise the Wage Act” will offer a small boost to some in exchange for “depriving” some people of all opportunity. The Congressional Budget Office’s analysis finds that, by 2025, a $15 minimum wage would give the average person, who keeps his job, an extra $50 a month.

The CBO estimates this may reduce the number of people living beneath the U.S. poverty level by 1.3 million. However, this comes as a “steep” cost. It would throw another 1.3 million people, and possibly as many as 3.7 million Americans, “out of work” altogether. This will fall disproportionately on those most in need: “the poor, minorities, the young, and those looking to enter the labor force.”

Second, “It destroys wealth.” Raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour will make the nation “poorer” as a whole. The CBO concludes that raising the minimum wage would “cost” the overall U.S. economy a total of $9 billion. Reducing the total amount of “resources” available to society does not aid the “poor and needy.”

Third, “It reduces the long-term earnings of the poor.” A higher minimum wage makes it less likely for workers to “move up” the economic ladder. The CBO report notes in passing: “A higher minimum wage might draw some workers who would otherwise attend school into the labor force. Those potential effects on family income are not accounted for in this analysis.” 

Fourth, “It squanders young people’s personal potential.” Encouraging young people to forgo higher education robs them, and society, of the blessings that flow from reaching their full potential. A 1995 study, which confirmed previous studies, found that increasing “minimum wages lead to a decline in the school enrollment rate and an increase in the proportion of teenagers who are neither employed nor enrolled in school.”

It’s no surprise that higher wages may “stimulate” labor participation. The “Bureau of Labor Statistics” found that the average worker with a high school diploma earns $192 a week, or $9,984 a year, more than someone without a diploma; and someone with a four-year college degree makes $23,972 a year more than a high school graduate.

A high “minimum wage” tantalizes workers in late adolescence with the immediate gratification of what seems to be “good money.” But it locks them into lower “income strata” for life. This is no small issue, since young people are the largest cohort of people affected by the minimum wage: “Nearly 98 percent of people earning the minimum wage are 24 or younger.”

This leads to the greatest “harm done by an excessively high minimum wage.”

To be sure, the rise of those “Neither Employed nor in Education or Training” (NEET) has a detrimental impact on society.“The male retreat from the labor force has exacerbated family breakdown, promoted welfare dependence, and recast ‘disability’ into a viable alternative lifestyle. Among these men the death of work seems to mean also the death of civic engagement, community participation, and voluntary association,” wrote Nicholas Eberstadt of AEI.

But the greatest “victim” of wasted potential is the worker himself or herself. Unlike other losses, the retreat of young people into “idleness” is incalculable. Only the full development of one’s intellectual faculties allows young men and women to become “truly outstanding in their training, ready to undertake weighty responsibilities in society and witness to the faith in the world.”

A minimum wage job usually “serves” as the beginning, rather than the end, of that process. By refusing further development, the person ends a “regret-filled life wondering what might have been.”

Buttigieg told The Washington Post that the nation has the opportunity for “religion to be not so much used as a cudgel but invoked as a way of calling us to a higher value.”

A nation gets no closer to understanding the “Heart of our Maker”, or encouraging human flourishing and civil discourse, by “distorting” the Bible or classifying everyone who “dissents” from the statist economic agenda as “blasphemers.” 

Followers of Jesus are supposed to “help” the poor, not use the government to “oppress” them, using their “faith” to justify their oppression.

Might I suggest that “Mayor Pete” listen to the words of Jesus in Matthew 7:3-5 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.”

In 2016, Mayor Pete pushed to “raise” South Bend city employee minimum wages to $10.10. He succeeded, and it’s been the same rate since. Now Pete is “declaring” that anything short of $15 an hour “oppresses the poor” in the eyes of the Lord.

Nothing in the Bible “dictates” that Employers pay their employees whatever wage is arbitrarily “chosen” by aspiring politicians eager for “votes.”

The very fact that the arbitrary wages “fluctuate” from place to place and moment to moment “ought” to be a clear sign that it is not a “mandate from heaven.”

If it were, Mayor Pete would have some “explaining” to do to the man upstairs for his “cruel, years-long oppression” of so many City of South Bend employees.

Don’t Blame the Gun

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on December 12, 2019 by andelino

Nobody blamed the “truck” when a 29-year-old Uzbek national rented a pickup from Home Depot 18 months ago and deliberately “mowed down” a dozen pedestrians and bicyclists in New York City, killing eight. There was no lobbying for “background checks” or more vehicle “rental laws.”

Yet every time there’s a “mass” shooting, political leaders call for more “gun” laws. More laws won’t fix the problem.

I understand the necessity for political posturing. The President tweets and governors issue statements condemning the heinous crime. They assure the nation of their “thoughts and prayers” and the need to stop the violence. Lawmakers and those vying for office insist that we need more legislation.

Some call for more drastic measures. Democratic presidential contender Pete Buttigieg told Fox News that “we cannot allow the Second Amendment to be a death sentence for thousands of Americans a year.”

We should expect as much from him.

Surely, I thought, faith leaders will cut to the heart of the problem. During Sunday morning Mass, a deacon read a statement about the weekend shootings in El Paso and Dayton from Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, president of the U.S. bishops’ conference, and Bishop Frank Dewane, chairman of their Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development.

“Once again, we call for effective legislation that addresses why these unimaginable and repeated occurrences of murderous gun violence continue to take place in our communities,” the cardinal wrote. “As people of faith, we continue to pray for all the victims, and for healing in all these stricken communities. But action is also needed to end these abhorrent acts.”

We should expect more from our bishops.

Sure, we must “pray” for the victims and their families. That’s essential. But we also need to “pray” for the mentally disturbed individuals who may contemplate “violence” in the future. As followers of Jesus, we know that our prayers are efficacious. We must beg God’s “grace” for these men. They’re out there, and their numbers are growing.

These young, lonely, disaffected young men often had “abusive, distant or absent” fathers. The breakdown of the family and the isolation exacerbated by technology is affecting the mental health of thousands, if not millions, of Americans.

Some bishops get it. Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput, who buried victims of the Columbine High School massacre 20 years ago, wrote that unless “hearts” are changed, mass murder like we witnessed will continue. He puts the blame squarely on the culture and each of us:

“Only a fool can believe that gun control will solve the problem of mass violence. The people using the guns in these loathsome incidents are moral agents with twisted hearts. And the twisting is done by the culture of sexual anarchy, personal excess, political hatreds, intellectual dishonesty, and perverted freedoms that we’ve systematically created over the past half-century.”

The vast majority of these shooters, bombers, and truck-driving killers come from “broken or abusive” families. The sobering thread running through the lives of all these perpetrators is “fatherlessness.” The late rapper Tupac Shakur once famously said, “I know for a fact that, had I had a father, I’d have some discipline. I’d have more confidence. Your mother can’t calm you down the way a man can. You need a man to teach you how to be a man.”

Things haven’t improved since Tupac was murdered in 1996. Today, despite a roaring economy, Americans are unhappy. Fortune reports that the 2019 “World Happiness Report” pegs the U.S. at No. 19—its worst ranking ever.

Like Chaput, one of the report’s co-authors points to Americans’ appetite for addiction including “gambling, social media use, video gaming, shopping, consuming unhealthy foods, exercising, and engaging in extreme sports or risky sexual behaviors.”

These addictions are coping mechanisms for isolation. Millennial’s are among the loneliest and most isolated generation in our nation’s history, according to a new YouGov survey. Nearly a third say they always feel lonely.

“Millennial’s are also more likely than older generations to report that they have no acquaintances (25% of Millennial’s say this is the case), no friends (22%), no close friends (27%), and no best friends (30%),” according to the report.

These are the issues we expect our faith leaders to address. We expect politicians to pass legislation that keeps weapons out of the hands of mentally unstable individuals, even though that won’t solve the problem. Troubled, angry men will then use a “knife, a bomb, or a truck” to lash out at the innocent.

Politicians and faith leaders need to understand once and for all: “it’s a heart problem, not a gun problem.” At the heart of the problem are the three “B’s”: “beliefs, bonds, and boundaries.”

It is not people of “faith” who are the most likely to go on a shooting rampage; it is those who have no “religious” convictions. This does not mean that simply being an agnostic or an atheist is sufficient to cause someone to become a mass murderer. That’s nonsense. But to discount the role of religion in examining the lives of young men who are “socially dysfunctional” is also nonsense, and this is especially true of mass murderers.

“Bonds” matter greatly. If someone has a strong relationship with his family and his friends, not to mention God, he is considerably less likely to become a mass killer. This does not mean that all loners are likely to wind up like the El Paso and Dayton killers. But it does mean that this characteristic, when coupled with the other two “B’s,” is an important variable.

Not respecting “boundaries” is also associated with criminal behavior. All of us cross the line once in a while, but to those who find it easy to do so, and who do so with regularity, beware: “They are more likely to hurt someone than the rest of us.”

From what we know about the El Paso killer, he was a classic loner. A former neighbor, called him an “extreme” loner who sat alone on the school bus. “He wouldn’t talk to people,” she said. “No one really knew him.”

The Dayton killer, was described by one of his band mates as a “loner.” Another person who knew him said “he was a quiet kid who kept to himself.”

It is not clear what “religious” affiliation, if any, they had. But we know that one worshipped Satan and wore “satanic” patches on his jacket.

Much too much is being made of the political leanings of these men. One was upset with the “Hispanic invasion of Texas,” and in the eyes of some that makes him a white nationalist. But he was also an extreme environmentalist, a critic of big corporations, and a proponent of universal health care. The other was a self-described leftist who “championed the cause of left-wing terrorists.”

There are many things that can be done to lessen the likelihood of “mass” shootings, but not to address “rootlessness” is a serious mistake. Last year a Cigna study showed that the most likely persons to be lonely were young people, not the elderly. Most of them, of course, will not become mass murderers, but it is from their ranks, not the well adjusted, where the next mass shooter is likely to come from.

A study published in the “Journal of Abnormal Psychology” found a significant increase of “mental distress, depression, and suicidal thoughts” among adults. The greatest increase was among young people.

The lack of social interaction is a real problem. By 2012, it was evident that smart phones and social media had overtaken the lives of millions of young people. The authors of this study concluded that there was a direct relationship between “the increase in loneliness among young people and the use of smart phones and social media.” It’s the amount of time that young people spend on their phones that is most disturbing. Indeed, the more time spent with these devices, the greater the risk of depression.

Of course, most young persons who are addicted to their phone are not likely to murder. But again, we would be remiss not to study the forces that create the milieu in which “anti-social behavior” is more likely to occur.

It is irresponsible to allow “ideologues” to drive the discussion of mass shootings. This problem will not be curbed by “blaming” white nationalists or Christian nationalists, which are the new “bad guys” in the left-wing playbook. After all, young black men who kill each other in the inner city with abandon have nothing to do with white nationalists or Christian nationalists. That they are given less attention by the media than violent white men smacks of “racism.”

Cities, towns and villages across the nation should institute “hot lines” for the public to call when they suspect that a young person is seriously in need of help. The hot lines would not involve the police: “they would be staffed by the clergy, guidance counselors, social workers, and psychologists.” After fielding a call, they would make an assessment and, if necessary, contact those who know the individual. If the troubled youth cooperates, he would be given the help he needs.

There won’t be any major progress until we focus on what can be done about the lack of “beliefs, bonds and boundaries” that are characteristic of mass killers.

Commonsense Gun Laws

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on July 5, 2019 by andelino

The moment the tragic shooting in Virginia Beach Municipal Building occurred that left 12 “innocent” people dead, the Democrats pounced on the story and started tweeting instantly their typical “insanity.”

It was simply “disgusting” having to watch the Democrat orgy of shameless “political” opportunism being tweeted out by this “pack of 2020 jackals.”

Do the 2020 Democrats actually care about those 12 innocent people who died in this horrific attack… NO!

Democrats could care less about the “pain and suffering” that the families of those who lost their loved ones in Virginia Beach as long as they get to hear themselves shrill about “gun violence.”

They were so interested in pouncing on this horrific event to try to score themselves some “cheap political points”, that they couldn’t tell you the name of even “one of those victims.”

But Lord knows, ask the same 2020 Democrats the make and model of the .45 caliber handgun used, they’ll not only tell you the name of that company, but they’ll rattle off their address, phone number, company email, as well as their Twitter handle.

Despite the fact that the killer used a .45-caliber pistol with a “sound suppressor” device and “extended” ammunition magazines, all of which, according to a federal agent the black  city employee purchased “legally.”

Here are the Democrats “Twittering Twits”

Joe Biden did not tweet until 10:30 PM and many, if not all, reports by now were stating that 12 people had been killed.

“11 innocent lives cut down. 11 more futures denied. When will we finally say enough is enough? It’s long past time to hold our leaders accountable. Jill and I are heartbroken that more American families are suffering tonight in Virginia Beach.” — Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) June 1, 2019

 Question for Clueless Joe Biden: “What Commonsense Gun Law of yours would have prevented the Virginia Beach Shooting?”

Bernie Sanders was at his “idiotic” best when he tried to connect NRA lobbying to this horrific shooting.

“Jane and I are grieving for the victims in Virginia Beach and their families. The days of the NRA controlling Congress and writing our gun laws must end. Congress must listen to the American people and pass gun safety legislation. This sickening gun violence must stop.” https://t.co/iSAtYWg7HH — Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) May 31, 2019

Question for Clueless Bernie Sanders: “What Commonsense Gun Law of yours would have prevented the Virginia Beach Shooting?”

Elizabeth Warren tweeted some “stupidity” about Congress needs to act.

“I’m heartsick and praying for the victims and their loved ones. Eleven people should not have been murdered today. How many lives will it take before Congress acts to end this crisis?” https://t.co/SU3oBQRol1 — Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) May 31, 2019

Question for Clueless Elizabeth Warren: “What Commonsense Gun Law of yours would have prevented the Virginia Beach Shooting?”

Pete Buttigieg whose only “qualification” for becoming President of the United States seems to be being “gay” also pounced on the tragic news.

“Another horrific shooting shocks the nation, this time in Virginia Beach. We grieve with those impacted even as we await more information. Already, this much is clear: it is unacceptable for America to remain the only developed country where this is routine. We must act.” — Pete Buttigieg (@PeteButtigieg) May 31, 2019

 Question for Clueless Pete Buttigieg: “What Commonsense Gun Law of yours would have prevented the Virginia Beach Shooting?”

Beto O’Rourke joined in with wanting to “prevent” a tragedy like this from ever happening again.

“Thinking of the Virginia Beach community, the families forever changed, the lives cut short by gun violence and the inaction in this country to prevent it. I want to work with you to meet this crisis with the urgency it demands and finally end this epidemic.” — Beto O’Rourke (@BetoORourke) June 1, 2019

 Question for Clueless Beto O’Rourke: “What Commonsense Gun Law of yours would have prevented the Virginia Beach Shooting?”

Kamala Harris did what the other 2020 democrat “dimwits” did not. Harris acknowledged the “bravery” of those four Police Officers who put an end to this POS killing spree.

“Heartbroken for the victims and their families of the Virginia Beach shooting and grateful for the first responders on the scene. This senseless act of violence should not be normal. Too many communities have been shattered by gun violence — we cannot continue to stand idly by.” https://t.co/JC4L7glGtE — Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) May 31, 2019

 Question for Clueless Kamala Harris: “What Commonsense Gun Law of yours would have prevented the Virginia Beach Shooting?”

 Cory Booker also took to Twitter shortly after the shooting occurred.

“We have the power to stop this. 11 people dead. My heart breaks for those killed in another senseless act of gun violence & the loved ones of the victims whose lives are now shattered. We have the power to stop this—we can & will pass commonsense gun safety laws to end these tragedies.” https://t.co/twaqJ99l95 — Cory Booker (@CoryBooker) May 31, 2019

 Question for Clueless Cory Booker: “What Commonsense Gun Law of yours would have prevented the Virginia Beach Shooting?”

 Despite having two days to actually think about what “Commonsense Gun Law” he could, or would propose to end these tragedies, Booker went on CNN and could not answer Jake Tapper’s simple question of “What law of his would have prevented the Virginia Beach Shooting?”

While Cory Booker is certainly a “dumb ass”, he must be truly “brain damaged” not to have anticipated this question being asked.

Of course, after “two failed attempts” to hold Cory Booker accountable for his “idiocy”, Tapper let Booker off the “hook” because after all his CNN salary is paid in part by the DNC, and Tapper knows enough to never “bite the hand that feeds you.”

 

All of America is waiting with “anxious” anticipation what  “Commonsense Gun Laws” will prevent future “mass shootings” with guns and ammunition purchase “legally”?

 

DeWayne Craddock Disgruntled City Worker, Kills 12 In Virginia Beach Shooting

 

%d bloggers like this: