Archive for personality disorder

Children of Darkness

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on July 7, 2017 by andelino

What happens when you make a compilation of “Social Justice Warriors” (SJW) going “insane and chimping out,” and then “replace” the audio of the video compilation with the “voice-over” of an old documentary about “mental illness?”

You end up with what can only be described as “top quality accidental comedy.”

If no one “informed” you that the video you were watching wasn’t the “original” visual image of the audio, you “probably” wouldn’t know.

Turns out that “SJW” aren’t so different from “mentally insane people.”

If you were to come across someone who “cried” in the streets, who saw the world in terms of black and white and made death threats against strangers, who “cowered” in a special room and made public displays of “naked self-harm and bloodletting,” you might conclude that they were “suffering” from some kind of “personality disorder.”

All these symptoms can be found in the “High Conflict Personality Disorder” category known as “Axis II in DSMV, including Anti-Social PD, Histrionic PD, Paranoid PD, Narcissistic PD, and Borderline PD.”

Alternatively, you might “reason” that these are the everyday “behaviors” of the modern “Social Justice Warrior.”

Of course, not every SJW has a “personality” condition, but sufferers from “High Conflict Disorders” are often drawn to extreme “beliefs and behaviors” under the illusion that they are “acting politically.”

A 2016 UK survey found that, since 1990, rates of “depression and anxiety” among the young have “increased” by 70%, while the American Counseling Association has reported a “rising tide of personality disorders among Millennial’s.”

That such disorders appear to be an “acute” problem with this generation may be an unintended “outcome” of the unprecedented experiment “conducted” in the 1990s and 2000s by “progressive” parents.

Persecution Complex and the “Safe Space”

In 2014, a “survey” of 100,000 college students at 53 U.S. “campuses” by the American College Health Association found that 84% of U.S. students feel unable to cope, while more than half experience overwhelming anxiety.

A byproduct of such “fear” has been the growth of the “safe space,” a safe-haven for minority groups and “distressed” students from what they perceive as “threats” within campus life.

Safe spaces contain “comforting” objects that evoke childhood memories like “bean bags, soothing music, Play-Doh and coloring books.” The spaces often “forbid” entry to straight “white men or political opponents.”

The idea of “running to the safe space” is a form of psychological “regression.” The safe space presents a “fantasy barrier” against imagined exterior “evils,” and so encourages “persecution paranoia and hyper-fragility.”

These are all “symptoms” of histrionic, borderline “paranoid personality disorders” that emerge from problems with the early “child-parent” bond.

The majority of “millennial” children (now aged 18-34) had two “working” parents; this was partly an “ideological” project of feminism and partly “economic” necessity.

The “downside” was the damage done by “daycare services” which grew by 250% between the 1970s and 90s (see Laura Perrins’ work on psychological trauma caused by daycare).

According to Bowlby’s “Maternal Deprivation Thesis,” babies require two years of “intimate” attention to enable them to form the “caregiver-child” bond essential for secure “ego” formation.

Any “disturbance” of this process will “predispose the children to respond in an anti-social way to later stresses.”

The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development has found:

“Children in full-time day care were close to three times more likely to show behavior problems than those cared for by their mothers at home. The more time in child care of any kind or quality, the more aggressive the child.”

The result is young people who, a decade and a half after daycare, “scream” at the parent/State for not “protecting” them sufficiently. It is no coincidence that “safe spaces” resemble daycare centers.

Unfortunately, “safe spaces” enforce the distressed person’s fear of the world, “trapping” them in their original trauma within a psychological frame of “permanent and inescapable victim-hood.”

“Trigger Warnings” and “Helicopter Parents”

 For the “SJW” everyday speech contains a multitude of “micro aggression’s,” or subconscious “power” dynamics which conceal “colonial or patriarchal” oppression.

Failing to use the “words” prescribed by SJW activists, most particularly in the case of “trans-people,” is seen as an act of “violence” equivalent to “physical assault.”

See, for example, a “statement” made by a protester at UC Berkeley in January 2017 at a protest event that “turned” into a violent riot: “Your free speech is raping and killing us.”

 People with “High Conflict Personality Disorders” experience similarly “paranoid” emotions about “hidden messages, omnipotent threats, and imminent violence.”

They are “hyper-alert” and live with higher than normal levels of “cortisol and adrenaline,” which in turn causes lasting “neurological” damage, affecting their ability to “reason” and to regulate “emotion.” They “panic” easily and “regress” to infantile distress.

Faced with “histrionic” students, university staff end up behaving like “Helicopter Parents”: those largely absent, full-time working parents who “overcompensated” by flying in to fuss over their child.

Attempting to assuage “parental guilt,” one of the tools they used was “positive parenting,” a philosophy created by “Social Progressives.”

Parents were taught to not “scold or punish,” and instead to use “positive reinforcement” in an attempt to “raise” their children with “high self-esteem.”

This “ideology” also became fashionable within an increasingly “progressive” school system that awarded children prizes for “non-competitive sports” and for merely taking “part in school activities.”

As they passed from “day care to through high school,” these children with artificially enforced “high self-esteem” were also told that they were “morally superior” to generations that came before.

They were “inducted” into politically correct language and were even “taught” to lecture their own parents on “racism, equality, and ecology.”

From the ages of six to eighteen, they took part in yearly multiculturalists “save the planet” projects. They were told they had a heroic destiny as “agents of change.”

A “false” picture of the world and a vastly “inflated” sense of self-importance did not “compensate” for the foundational trauma of “parental neglect.”

Instead, as Dr. Jean Twenge has explained, “Positive Parenting created young people with a ‘narcissistic wound’ for whom the real world would be perceived as a threat to self-worth.”

Border Violation and Self-Harm

The “Positive Parenting” movement expounded the beliefs that “there is no boundary between you and your child” and that “you are friends and equals.”

For the child growing up without “paternalistic laws and boundaries,” the only way to find “limits” was to attack the only boundary it knew: “its own bodily boundaries.”

In this light it is worth “exploring” why the Fourth Wave feminist/social justice activist group known as “Femen” should mimic the outward signs of the “BID” sufferer.

Their “trademark” form of protest is public “toplessness,” with slogans written over the “belly and breasts” in fake or real blood. One classic Femen image is of an “almost-naked” woman holding a protest sign that reads: “Rape Me. I’m a Slut.”

The “intention” may have been to “demonstrate” that no matter how “sexually” a woman dresses she is still not “asking for it.”

But public “nudity” as a protest against sexual “violation” is a contradictory signal, sending out “conflicted” messages around dangerous “sexual” subjects is a symptom of “BPD and NPD.”

The Femen “protester” may subconsciously be saying, “show me boundaries and control, show me authority and concern.” She might be “displaying” the pain of living within a “self-in-contradiction.”

Contradiction and Splitting

 SJW protests are “awash” with contradictions. SJWs claim to “fight” for freedom, but are “opposed” to freedom of speech, support “banning” videos and books, and support the “violent” disruption of public talks, as was seen with the “riots” at UC Berkeley, Middlebury College, and elsewhere.

SJWs believe in a world with “no boundaries” where “everyone is equal,” free immigration, open access to healthcare and education, etc., but at the same time are “obsessed with creating segregated spaces.”

While they protest against the “fascist patriarchal state” they are, at the same time, fundamentally “Statist,” demanding that the government “police” language for them and “punish” their enemies.

While SJWs claim to fight for “human rights,” they parade the symbol of the largest “genocides” in history, the “Communist” flag. They are “pro-feminist,” and at the same time defend “Sharia law.”

“Living-in-contradiction” is similar to the “Love me — I hate you” dynamic in Borderline pathology called “Splitting.”

In splitting, everything is “all or nothing,” and the thing that was passionately “idealized” suddenly becomes an “object of hatred.”

“Traitors” are everywhere. This was exemplified by the “expulsion” of gay men and “TERFS” — “Trans exclusionary radical feminists” — from LGBT+ groups by “Inter-sectional” feminists.

Along with splitting comes the symptoms of “low-impulse control, histrionics, dysphoria, a pervasive sense of emptiness, suicidal ideation, and self-harming.”

Symbolic demonstrations of “self-harming behaviors” are widely used in SJW protests.

Along with “smearing” faces with fake blood to “signify” female oppression, a protest group called “Lesbians and Gays Support the Migrants” in the UK in 2015 took “razors” to their arms in public to “spill rivers of blood.”

With an attempted “self-immolation” and a reported contagion of “suicide threats” occurring during the Trump protests, thousands attempted to use “politics as an alibi for a deeper inner compulsion to self-harm.”

The Results of the Human Experiment

 Trapped among “infant” neglect, artificially elevated “self-esteem,” and identity “dysphoria,” the Millennial’s were “set up” for a fall.

When they were “pushed” out of their parental homes in the 2010s, they “discovered” they did not have the tools to construct “stable” selves.

They couldn’t “blame” their parents or teachers. Instead they searched for a “vast, abstract, all-encompassing enemy.”

In “identity politics” they found a temporary unity, through “hatred of Patriarchy, of Capitalism, of White Men.”

In President Trump they found their savior.

 In the stages before “psychosis,” sufferers from High Conflict Personality Disorders “fixate” on one object of hate. Subconsciously, they need this “super-enemy” so they can feel whole.

This is the tragic “truth” of the identity politics of the SJW. Without a totalizing “object of blame,” the personality of the “warrior for social justice” falls apart.

While the SJWs idealize themselves as “victims” of omnipresent evil, they are in fact the victims of well-meaning “liberal” parents and “progressive” teachers who subjected them to an “experiment in social engineering.“

They were the “guinea pigs” of the progressive project. Older generations of “radicals” then exploited their “volatility and rage” for political ends.

Now is the time for your lovin’, dear, and the time for your company.
Now when the light of reason fails and fires burn on the sea,
Now in this age of confusion I have need of your company.

For I am a wild and lonely child and the son of an angry land,
Now with the high wars raging I would offer you my hand,
For we are the children of darkness and the prey of a foul command.

It’s once I was free to go roaming in the wind of a springtime mind,
Once the clouds I sailed upon were sweet as lilac wine,
Then, why have the breezes of summer, dear, been laced with a grim design?

And where was the will of my father when he raised his sword on high?
And where was my mother’s wailing when our flags were justified?
And where will we take our pleasure when our bodies have been denied?

What “Children of Darkness” are actually asking for, when they scream at us, “is our hlp.”

Millennial’s Killed 19 Things Last Year


Self Sacrificial Desertion

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on March 20, 2016 by andelino

Self Sacificial Desertion 00

Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, accused of “desertion” told an officer interrogating him after he returned from captivity his reasons for leaving his post.

Bergdahl told a general who investigated the case that he “hoped to cause an alarm” by leaving his post, then “walk” to a larger base in Afghanistan so he could have an “audience” with a top commander.

“So, the idea was to — it was — literally, it was a sacrificial — it was a self-sacrifice thing,” Bergdahl said, according to the transcript of a 2014 interview with Maj. Gen. Kenneth Dahl.

Self Sacificial Desertion 03

Another newly “released” document from July 2015 shows that an Army Sanity Board Evaluation “concluded” that Bergdahl suffered from “schizotypal personality disorder” when he left the post.

A Mayo Clinic website says people with this “disorder” have trouble interpreting “social cues” and can develop significant “distrust” of others.

Bergdahl faces charges of “desertion and misbehavior” before the enemy, the latter of which carries up to a “life” sentence.

He was “held” five years by the Taliban and its allies before a “swap” involving five Guantanamo Bay detainees, prompting “criticism” from many in Congress that the “move” by Barack Obama threatened “national” security.

Self Sacificial Desertion 02

His military “trial” had been tentatively scheduled to begin over the summer, but it has been “delayed” by disagreements over access to “classified” materials.

Bergdahl’s attorney Eugene Fidell said the decision to “release” the documents was made to fight “negative publicity” and because prosecutors have already entered “part of the interview” into the court record.

“The more Americans know about this case, the better,” Fidell said in an email.

In the interview, Bergdahl expressed “misgivings” about how he and other soldiers were sent to help “retrieve” a disabled armored vehicle before encountering “explosives and enemy fire” that turned a six-hour mission into lasting “several” days.

None of the men was killed, but Bergdahl said an officer complained they were “unshaven” upon their return to base.He said he began to worry “that if he didn’t say anything,” a future bad order could get someone in his “platoon” killed.

“Emails reported by the late Michael Hastings in Rolling Stone in 2012 reveal what Bergdahl’s fellow infantrymen learned within days of his disappearance: he told people that he no longer supported the U.S. effort in Afghanistan. “The future is too good to waste on lies,” Bowe wrote to his parents. “And life is way too short to care for the damnation of others, as well as to spend it helping fools with their ideas that are wrong. I have seen their ideas and I am ashamed to even be American. The horror of the self-righteous arrogance that they thrive in. It is all revolting.” Bergdahl wrote to them, “I am sorry for everything. The horror that is America is disgusting.”

So his “desertion” was an act of “self-sacrifice”? I don’t think too many people, except Obama and his ilk, will buy that “explanation” any more than they would accept Bergdahl “going outside the chain of command” to make his complaint.

Self Sacificial Desertion 04

Leaving his post to “trek across miles of enemy territory” just to complain about an officer who told him he “needed a shave” strikes me as ludicrous.

The only question in my mind is how “lenient” they are going to be on Bergdahl in “sentencing.”

If Obama has anything to “say about it,” Bergdahl will probably receive little more than a “slap” on the wrist and be “pardoned” by Obama upon leaving the White “Rainbow” Mosque.

The deserter is an “embarrassment” to the administration after the president and his people “bent over backwards” to portray him as “some kind of hero.”

It’s the only way they can “justify” trading 5 violent “terrorists” for him in the first place.

And what are those “terrorists” up to? At least 3 of them have tried to “rejoin” the fight. That makes the “prisoner deal” one of the most “lopsidedly bad deals” in American military history.

Self Sacificial Desertion 01

Clockwise from top left: Sgt. Michael Murphrey, age 25, was killed in an IED blast on Sept. 5, 2009; Private First Class Morris Walker, age 23, and Staff Sgt. Clayton Bowen, age 29 were killed in an IED explosion on Aug. 18, 2009. Staff Sergeant Kurt Curtiss, age 27, died in a firefight on Aug. 26, 2009. Second Lt. Darryn Andrews, age 34, and Private First class Matthew Michael Martinek, age 20 died after an RPG ambush on Sept. 4, 2009.

We must never “forget” the six U.S. Army soldiers who were “killed” while looking for Bergdahl in the days following his “desertion” and joining the “enemy” in Afghanistan.

The “punishment” for being a “traitor/deserter” in wartime is a “firing squad.”

Self Sacificial Desertion 05

Why hasn’t Bergdahl yet been “executed” for his desertion act in “wartime” which cost the lives of “six-fallen soldiers” trying to find this “deserter?”

Eugene Fidell, Bergdahl’s defense attorney is “furious” at what Trump called the soldier now being “prosecuted” for desertion.

“This is the lowest kind of demagoguery,” Fidell said. “Mr. Trump’s comments are contemptible and UN-American. They are a call for mob justice.”

Trump made the “remarks” during a town hall meeting in New Hampshire.

“We get a traitor named Bergdahl, a dirty, rotten traitor, who, by the way, when he deserted, six young, beautiful people were killed trying to find him,” Trump said.

In exchange, Trump said, the enemy got “five of the people they wanted, five killers back on the battlefield. That’s the kind of deals we make.”

Well, isn’t it about “time” someone calls Bergdahl a “traitor” in public for a change?

Because he “is” and should be “executed.”

Fancy Terminology for a “Traitor”
A 371 page transcript of Bergdahl’s interview with Major General Kenneth Dahl
U.S. Army Charges Bowe Bergdahl with Desertion
Deserter Returns to Undeserved Hero’s Welcome
Bowe Bergdahl Diagnosed with Personality Disorder


Personality Disorder

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on September 6, 2015 by andelino

Personality Disorder 01

You may not be familiar with “Borderline Personality Disorder,” but two percent of American adults “suffer” from this condition.

The main feature of “Borderline Personality Disorder” (BPD) is a pervasive pattern of “instability in interpersonal relationships, self-image and emotions.”

“Borderline Personality Disorder” occurs mostly in “late” adulthood. The unstable pattern of “interacting” with others is usually “closely” related to the person’s “social” interactions.

The pattern is present in a “variety” of settings, not just at work or home, and often is accompanied by “lability” in a person’s “emotions and feelings.”

These individuals are very “sensitive” to environmental circumstances. The perception of impending “separation or rejection,” or the loss of “external” structure, can lead to “profound” changes in “self-image, affect, cognition, and behavior.”

They experience “intense” abandonment, fears and inappropriate anger, even when faced with a “realistic” time-limited separation or when there are “unavoidable” changes in plans.

U.S. Secretary of Inebriation, Hillary Clinton

They may believe that this “abandonment” implies they are “bad.” These abandonment “fears” are related to an intolerance of being “alone” and a need to have other “people” with them. Relationships and the person’s “emotions” are  seen by others as being “shallow.”

A “personality disorder” is an enduring pattern of inner experience and behavior that “deviates” from the norm of the “individual’s” culture. The pattern is seen in the following areas: “cognition, affect, interpersonal functioning and impulse control.”

The enduring pattern is “inflexible” and pervasive across a broad range of “personal and social” situations.

It typically leads to significant “distress or impairment” in social, work or other areas of functioning. The pattern is “stable” and of long “duration,” and its onset can be traced back to “late” adulthood.


A person with this “disorder” will also often exhibit “impulsive” behaviors and have a “majority” of the following symptoms:

1. Frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment.
2. A pattern of unstable and intense interpersonal relationships characterized by alternating between extremes of idealization and devaluation.
3. Identity disturbance, such as a significant and persistent unstable self-image or sense of self.
4. Impulsivity in spending, sex, substance abuse, reckless driving, binge drinking/eating.

5. Recurrent suicidal behavior, gestures, or threats, or self-mutilating behavior.
6. Emotional instability due to significant reactivity of mood, intense episodic Dysphoria, irritability and anxiety.
7. Chronic feelings of emptiness.
8. Inappropriate intense anger, difficulty controlling temper, constant physical fights.
9. Transient, stress-related paranoid thoughts or severe dissociative symptoms.

Because “personality disorders” describe long-standing and enduring “patterns” of behavior, they are most often “diagnosed” in adulthood.

“Borderline Personality Disorder” is more “prevalent” in females (75 percent of diagnoses made are in females) and “affects” between 1.6 and 5.9 percent of the “general” population.

Personality Disorder 04

If she’s not in prison.

Like most personality disorders, “borderline personality disorder” typically will increase in “intensity” with age, with many people experiencing most “extreme” symptoms by the time they are in the 50’s or 60’s, as “evidenced” by Hillary Clinton.

Personality Disorder 05

Narcissus Politicus

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on June 13, 2012 by andelino

In today’s political climate the “average American” can see the disproportionate numbers of “narcissistic people” in the political arena even if they don’t “know” all the details and definitions of narcissism, they recognize the bad behavior.  Since we all have a bit of narcissism in us we recognize when someone else has gone way past normal.

Unfortunately, most “average Americans” can only see it after the “narcissist” has been elected and starts doing things that make our jaws drop. Being in politics and having power and privilege is why politicians “turn into narcissists”  as they get away with their crap in the process of stomping on others as they climb the ladder.

Narcissistic Personality Disorder develops in early childhood so it’s illogical to say someone can be “made” a narcissist later in life.  Oh, people can certainly become liars, greedy, power mad and the like but true narcissists are created very young.  By the time they reach the age to run for politics, they are already very astute at game playing and they tell slick lies and manipulate others without batting an eye or breaking a sweat.

Speeches are easy for them, written by others who make “narcs” look even better (narcissistic politicians are very thankful for teleprompters.)  Better yet, giving speeches means there is no real interaction with the people listening to the flowery phrases and grandiose promises. The audiences just listen, cheer and applaud.  For a narcissist, each speech is a shining opportunity to lie, to hear the adulation and applause they crave, but they don’t get questioned or busted on their bullshit and they are the center of attention.

It makes a narcissist’s hard, cold, empty heart flutter and swell with a sick version of what the rest of us call “pride.”  Most people are proud of their accomplishments but narcissists are proud of their ability to fool “most of the people most of the time.”

Worse yet, once they fool enough people and get elected, they get into office and proceed to break all those promises and refuse to be held accountable for anything they do.  And they all know it, so politicians are known for not reigning in other politicians because they don’t want things to change.  Of course all politicians aren’t narcissistic but the arena has way too many and they’re like cockroaches, everywhere, hard to get rid of, they scatter when the lights come on and they can survive just about everything designed to stop them, including laws, public opinion and that pesky Constitution.

And our government is full of them. The dismal state of American politics, our economy and the way that the public is manipulated into hatred, blaming and frustration as a result of these twisted people is abundantly clear to everyone not living under a rock.

It doesn’t really matter whether they’re democrat, republican, libertarian or independent. Narcissism is found everywhere in  politics more and more every day. We have become such an ad driven, fast food type of country that slick commercials, canned speeches, good hair and a lot of money allow emotionally disturbed individuals to rise to positions of power that decide the fate of our nation.  Right now, we’re not doing so hot and until voters choose to look under the hood “ instead of just admiring the vehicle and kicking a bit at the tires” this trend is only going to get worse.

Emotionally disordered people are making life and death decisions for us, they have enormous amounts of earth destroying weapons at their fingertips and they play with the taxpayer’s money as if they are just in a fun, friendly game of monopoly.  We’ve got to wake up to the reality of why nothing ever changes in Washington. It’s because often when one narcissist loses the election, another takes their place.

Don’t forget that narcissists do not care about anyone but themselves.  A “narc politician” could care less about you, me or America.  They only want the goodies, the power, the money and the glory.

Obama is said to be a serious narcissist and the above points are just part of the reasons he is thought to be. There are many others but the above paragraph points to character qualities that even his supporters can sometimes see and more often these days as the economy continues to falter.

Obama’s supporters who do see that our “emperor has no clothes” do not like what they actually got when they voted for “hope and change”.

Narcissus Politicus is a genus of limp, thin-skinned bulbs in the Demagogues family, native to Kenya, Chicago, and Washington, DC., with some anecdotal evidence of Hawaiian origins.

Named after Narcissus of Greek mythology who was in love with himself and disdained those who loved him. One day he became so obsessed with his own reflection in a pool of water that he died of starvation, unable to leave the beauty of his own image.

Another theory links the name to its narcotic properties “I grow numb”. While all narcissus are slightly toxic, Narcissus Politicus is more dangerous than others, acting as a strong irritant. Even brief exposure in a closed room can cause headache and vomiting.

%d bloggers like this: