Archive for nazi

Democrats and Hitler

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on July 16, 2019 by andelino

The only thing worse than wanting “open borders” is Democrats comparing “everything” to Hitler.

Alexandria “Sandy” Ocasio-Cortez keeps insisting that detention centers for “illegal” immigrants are somehow “Nazi” concentration camps.

The “Barmaid” from the Bronx has always had a “penchant” for hyperbole, remember the world “ending in 12 years,” but now she chose to take it to the “next level” arguing that the US has established “concentration camps” for immigrants where they are “being brutalized with dehumanizing conditions and dying.”

“This is not hyperbole. It is the conclusion of expert analysis,” she said. Who those “Experts” are she’s not divulging.  She also completely “ignores” Barack Obama’s dealings with “illegal” immigrant minors who were mistreated in custody during the Obama years and locked away, in what was by the press coined as “Hieleras” or “Freezers.”

Here is a link to a Washington Post story, no fans of President Trump, or the Republicans, entitled: ACLU alleges that immigrant minors were mistreated in custody during Obama Years. 

Obama blatantly “broke” the law to keep kids in private prisons, disregarding US district judge Dolly Gee ruling that his administration was “ignoring” the Flores Amendment to keep “illegal” immigrant children locked up past the 20-days U.S. law allowed.

As usual, when a member of the press “counters” Ocasio-Cortez’s fiction, AOC “attacks” them just like her supposed “Nazi” Donald Trump?

“Well, @chucktodd – the fact that you slipped in ‘Nazi’ when I never said that is pretty unfortunate. Almost as unfortunate as the fact that you spent this whole time w/o discussing DHS freezers, ‘dog pounds,’ missing children, & human rights abuses that uphold use of this term.” https://t.co/1eNuW1ZR0f — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 19, 2019

When AOC used the “Nazi” terminology  “never again” Conservatives and Democrats rightly called her out on “diminishing” the Holocaust.

But as usual, her allies in the media, and her fellow Democrats “defended” the simpleminded socialist by hair-splitting whether “concentration” and “death camps” were the same, and trying to argue she didn’t really refer to the ”Holocaust” despite saying “never again.”

It wasn’t long before Yad Vashem and the Auschwitz museum got involved, “lecturing” both AOC and her media allies that they should not take the name of the “Holocaust” in vain, nevertheless, they persisted.

According to AOC and “delusional” Democrats, you’re either for “open borders” or you’re a “Nazi” racist. During the 1990’s both parties started referencing “Hitler and the Nazi” in propaganda “designed” to get the US involved in another war.

When the Clinton administration started banging the “war drums” to get involved in the former Yugoslavia, politicians “exploited” WWII imagery, invoking “genocide” and urged the West to intervene to stop a new“Hitler.”

In 2003 Bush referenced “Hitler” when talking about Iraq, and the Obama administration invoked“Hitler” in 2011 to make his “case” for U.S. involvement in Libya and Syria.

But the Democrats didn’t stop invoking “Hitler’s” name when it came to just describing some “mad” regime. After President Bush’s election, they started comparing “Bush to Hitler” on a regular basis.

Moveon.org an organization “created” by George Soros and the Democrats calling for America to “impeach” philandering “rapist” Bill Clinton posted in 2004, an anti-Bush campaign ad that showed the 43rd president’s face morphing into “Adolph Hitler’s.”

From that “point” on, every Republican presidential candidate has been likened to the “Nazi” leader by Democrats.

John McCain in 2012, and Mitt Romney in 2016 both were announced as the second coming of “Hitler” but the Democrats clearly jumped the “Hitler” shark with Donald Trump.

Armed and masked activists calling themselves ANTIFA,” who were literally “assaulting” people on the street, were “labeled” by Democrats and the fake media “Nazi’s” despite the fact they clearly weren’t.

According to new Democratic “dogma,” if you are against “Open Borders” or not giving “Illegal Immigrants” the exact same rights as  American citizens, then you are a “Nazi” and deserve to be “assaulted.”

The main stream press recently lost their minds after Dayton, Ohio granted a permit for a “Nazi” white Supremacist rally. Taking the “hyperbole” to heights unseen, the Press corps “warned” Americans to stay away because the anticipated “violence” will have the streets of Dayton running “red” with blood.

Guess how many “Nazi” white supremist came to the huge “KKK” rally that the press claimed would show just how “racist” America had truly become under President Trump… NINE!

Democrats now use WWII to “validate” their insanity. AOC claimed “Climate Change is our WWII because we only have 12-years-left.” Amazingly the only thing that “WWII” and the “Green New Deal” have in common is the American “deaths” they will cause.

While we lost over 400,000 Americans in WWII that will be “pale” in comparison to how many Americans will die if the “Green New Deal” became law. It’s not even debatable… the “Green New Deal” will result in the “death” of millions of Americans.

There are no electric trucks to bring food to cities.
• There are no electric driven heavy equipment to build infrastructure, or buildings.
• There are no technologies that will produce enough energy to replace gas and oil.
• There is nothing to replace the fuel we need for cars, trucks, planes and heat our homes or cook food.
• Even if there were a power source to replace fossil fuels, we have no way of storing it.
• Battery technology is still on par with the first battery invented by Italian physicist Alessandro Volta in 1800.

Democrats like Cory Booker who is running for President, immediately started invoking “World War II” while declaring his “support” for AOC’s Green New Deal. Referencing “WWII” is already “bad” enough without the added dimension of the Democrats “historical” ignorance.

Other Democrats have gone this “Nazi” false equivalence route also.

Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.)

Tennessee’s first Jewish member of Congress compared Republicans to “Joseph Goebbels,” Adolf Hitler’s propaganda henchman during World War II.

Of course, all was forgiven with his “fake” apology, insisting he didn’t mean to call his Republican colleagues “Nazis” for their opposition to the health care reform law. He added “I would certainly never do anything to diminish the horror of the Nazi Holocaust as I revere and respect the history of my people.” Really? His “Sorry, not Sorry” apology was just as “insane” as his original comments were. Cohen, in fact, did “compare” Republicans to Joseph Goebbels, and he certainly “diminished” the memories of the 6 million Jews that were slaughtered.

Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.)

On the “International Holocaust Remembrance Day” no less, Clarke stood in front of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office in Manhattan and stated, “We are standing in front of a building that has become the headquarters for the Gestapo of the United States of America.” Congresswoman Clarke “compared” American men and women who help “enforce” dangerous immigration laws that Congress passed to the most vicious, ruthless group of “Nazis”, who targeted millions of innocent Jewish men, women, and children in concentration camps and murdered them in cold blood.

Marianne Williamson 

2020 Democratic presidential candidate Marianne Williamson recently said that the announcement by President Trump that ICE will begin mass deportations is “no different” than when Jews faced deportation in 1930s Nazi Germany. She then doubled down saying “I have visited the Anne Frank house. I’ve been to those places where people hid Jews in the basement. When I think of the fear that some of these people are going through right now since the president made that announcement — where are they going to go?”

Anne Frank was “hiding” from the Nazi’s because she feared being “brutalized, raped and killed” or being sent to a “concentration camp” and then “brutalized, raped and killed.”

“Illegal” Immigrants only fear being “caught” and then set “free” back into their own country without being “brutalized, raped or killed.”

Joe Biden Campaign

A CNN analyst and senior adviser at the “University of Delaware’s Biden Institute” charged that President Trump’s call to “reclaim” America’s heritage was similar to the rhetoric used by “Nazi” leader Adolf Hitler. Hysterically, former Vice President Joe Biden made virtually the same call to “Reclaim America’s Heritage” in 2011.

Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC)

Clyburn told CNN Don Lemon “I can only equate one period of time with what we are experiencing now and that was what was going on in Germany around 1934 right after the 1932 elections when Adolf Hitler was elected chancellor.” His remarks are historically illiterate and fundamentally dishonest.

Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA)

In a New Years day speech, held by the Atlanta NAACP, Johnson said: “Our democracy teeters on the brink of failure. Americans elected an authoritarian, racist, anti-immigrant strongman to the nation’s highest office. Hitler rode a wave of nationalism and anti-Semitism to power. Replace anti-Semitism with ‘all Latinos crossing our borders are rapists, drug dealers and murderers.’ Does that sound familiar? Americans, particularly black Americans, can’t afford to make that same mistake about the harm that could be done by a man named Hitler or a man named Trump.”

In fact, Johnson’s speech was so “repugnant” Rep. Dan Crenshaw posted a video on Twitter “denouncing” Johnson’s idiocy.

“Stop insulting Americans just because they vote for someone you don’t like.”pic.twitter.com/8wrP3ybtPe — Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) January 6, 2019

There are some Republicans that make similar comparisons between Democrats and “Nazi’s.” The big difference between the two parties is how much more “outrage” there is when a Republican says something similar.

And the double standard doesn’t end there, it also happens when the time comes to “pay the piper” for their idiocy. When Republicans do or say something “foolish” they are hounded until they resign, or dragged out of office. A Democrats simply say’s “Oops, my bad” and all is forgiven by Washington and the media.

Democrats need to end their “Nazi” bullshit, or start holding Obama to the same exact “standards” they’re holding Donald Trump to.

Congress Is Dysfunctional, So Send in the Cavalry
D’Souza traces roots of Democratic Party to Hitler’s Nazi Party

Al-Jazeera Network

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on June 2, 2019 by andelino

Arabic, an online media platform run by the Qatari “Al-Jazeera Network” posted a video on May 18, 2019 about “The Story of the Holocaust” on Twitter and Facebook.

The video was titled: “The Gas Chambers Killed Millions of Jews – That’s How the Story Goes. What Is the Truth behind the Holocaust and How Did the Zionist Movement Benefit from It?”

The video was narrated by Muna Hawwa, a Kuwaiti-born “Palestinian” who lives in Qatar and works as a “producer” for the Al-Jazeera Network. In the video, Hawwa claimed that the number of Jewish Holocaust victims remains “one of the most prominent historical debates to this day,” and she said that some people believe that Hitler supported “Zionist” ideology.

She claimed that the “much-regurgitated narrative of the Holocaust sorrows” paved the way for Jewish immigration to Palestine, and although she stressed that “denouncing the Holocaust is a moral obligation,” Hawwa added that Israel is the biggest “winner” from the Holocaust and that it uses the “same justification” as a “launching pad for the racial cleansing and annihilation of the Palestinians.”

Hawwa said that the ideology behind the State of Israel “suckled from the Nazi spirit,” and concluded: “So how can a Palestinian denounce a crime that has become the flip side of his own tragedy?”

Shortly after its publication, the video could no longer be “accessed” on Facebook but it can be viewed at the “links” below for the time being.

https://www.memri.org/…/al-jazeera-holocaust-denial-israel-…
https://www.facebook.com/memri.org/videos/2311063345879298/
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2311063345879298

Here is the video transcript:

The narrative that six million Jews were killed by the Nazi movement was adopted by the Zionist movement, and it is being reiterated every year on the so-called “Holocaust Memorial Day.” Let us tell you about the story of the Holocaust.

More than nine million Jews lived in Europe before World War II, most of them in the countries that would later be taken over by the Nazis. After the Holocaust, the Zionist movement claimed that 2 out of every 3 Jews were killed.

The Nazis targeted anyone they considered to be “human surplus” – either because they were “racially inferior,” or because they were not accepted politically. This means that the Jews were not the only victims of that era. The Nazis targeted the Romani, the Slavic nations, and some Arabs, as well as other groups like communists, socialists, trade unions, homosexuals, and the handicapped.

Along with others, the Jews faced a policy of systematic persecution, which culminated in the “Final Solution,” or annihilation. Their books were burned, they were fired from their jobs, their property was confiscated, and they were torn from their homes, in order to live in the secluded ghetto neighborhoods. They were forced to wear a special badge on their clothes. They were sent to detention centers, and they were worked to death in forced labor. The victims of the Nazis – who were following Hitler’s orders – exceeded 20 million people. The Jews were part of them. So why is there a focus only on them?

The Jewish groups had financial resources, media institutions, research centers, and academic voices that managed to put a special spotlight on the Jewish victims of the Nazis. Nevertheless, the number of victims of the Holocaust remains one of the most prominent historical debates to this day. People are divided between those who deny the annihilation, others who think that the outcome was exaggerated, and others yet who accuse the Zionist movement of blowing it out of proportion in the service of the plan to establish what would later be known as the “State of Israel.”

Let us take a pause here. How did Israel benefit from the Holocaust? In the first months following the Nazis’ rise to power, an agreement was signed between Nazi Germany and the Jewish Agency, the purpose of which was to make it easy for the Jews to immigrate to Palestine, in exchange for surrendering their property to Germany.

This agreement, along with other documents, made some people believe that Hitler supported Zionism. Former Mayor of London [Ken Livingstone] publicly declared this belief, and he was suspended from the Labor Party because of this. The persecution and the suffering – the much-regurgitated narrative of the Holocaust sorrows – paved the way for the Jewish immigration to Palestine.

Germany is still paying huge reparations for what happened in World War II to a state that did not even exist at the time of the annihilation. Greece, the Serbs, Yugoslavia, and the Romani people have all suffered, but the Germany reparations to those victims cannot be compared to the payments to Israel, which, in turn, devoured the reparations of all the Jewish victims of Nazism.

The Holocaust never stops to be a tragic event. Several countries denounce it as a crime. Dozens of institutions sponsor large museums in various capitals in the world commemorating the tragedy of the Jews. This provoked great interest in this incident, even though similar crimes, no less heinous, are still being perpetrated against other peoples.

Denouncing the Holocaust is a moral obligation, but Israel is the biggest winner from the Holocaust, and it uses the same Nazi justifications as a launching pad for the racial cleansing and annihilation of the Palestinians. The main ideology behind the “State of Israel” is based on religious, national, and geographic concepts that suckled from the Nazi spirit and its main notions. So how can a Palestinian denounce a crime that has become the flip side of his own tragedy?

The “annihilation” of any people because of their “race, sex or religion” is an unacceptable thing that “deserves” to be strongly denounced.

I wonder if “Muslima” Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib were “consultants” on this video?

Wasn’t it  Joseph Goebbels, Adolf Hitler‘s Propaganda Minister in Nazi_Germany” who said “If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself?

Is Al-Jazeera “anti-Semitic”? That’s kind of like asking is the “Pope Catholic”?

Al Jazeera Pulls Video Claiming Jews Inflated Numbers Of Holocaust Victims

Al Jazeera Says Its Holocaust Denial Video Was A Mistake, But Has A Long History Of Anti-Semitism

 

Democratic Socialism

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on May 24, 2019 by andelino

Not a day goes by where the media and many Democrats don’t slander Trump, Christians, Republicans, Conservatives, and even white men as “Nazis” and “Hitler.” 

Even worse, those on the “Far Left” who increasingly describe themselves as “Democratic Socialists,” ignore the fact that the word “NAZI” stands for “National Socialist German Workers Party” whose socialist policies were virtually “identical” to those of Bernie Sanders’ and other Democratic Socialist followers.

Actually, Adolf Hitler wasn’t a “right wing,” he was a “Socialist Liberal.” There’s an easy way to remember it –“ NAZI” stands for “National Socialist German Workers‘ Party.” 

What does “National Socialist German Worker’s Party” mean and how is it different from “Democratic Socialism”? Basically it’s a matter of “semantics.”

A Democracy is a “mob rule”, which is why America is actually a “constitutional representative republic” and not a democracy.

“A representative republic protects the minority from the majority, whereas a democracy is the rule of the majority.” Leftists get caught up in words, getting tripped up over “National Socialism” as opposed to “Democrat Socialism.” But it’s just that. “Semantics.”

What we don’t often hear or learn about is how Hitler “ruled” the rest of Germany, what his domestic “socialist policies” were for the German people he didn’t “march off to death camps.”

They’re eerily similar to what American Democrats “tout” today. He initially had the support of “mobs” of people. Now replace many of Hitler’s “policies” with something you hear from Bernie Sanders and other Democratic Socialist.

Hitler’s policies were anything but “conservative.” He wanted big government, big education, and thought control. He hated “political” dissidents. He loathed “free-speech.” He feared an “armed” citizenry.

Notice the policy similarities between “Hitler’s National Socialists” and the “Far Left Democratic Socialists” of today:

Employment for All 

After the Great Depression, Hitler made a huge promise to his people: “employment for all.” How did he do it? Roads and infrastructure

Big Education and National Healthcare

Kitty Werthmann, an Austrian World War II survivor, gives her account of Hitler’s “takeover” of Austria. The similarities to today’s left and their “progressive agenda” are staggering! This is a ”must watch!”

Gun Control

Yes, Germany had “gun” control. It started before Hitler with a national gun registry in the 1920s during the chaos of Germany’s Weimar Republic, which “opted” for gun registration. Law-abiding persons complied with the law, but the Communists and Nazis committing acts of “political violence” did not. Finally, Hitler took the guns from Jews.

Abortion

The great “sacrament” of the left, abortion. You’ll be pleased to know that Hitler was “pro-choice.” Compare the Nazi’s application of abortion to how “Planned Parenthood”, a government-funded organization, operates. Also read up on Margaret Sanger, who echoed much of Hitler’s sentiment.

Blaming the Jews

Hitler used the Jews as a “scapegoat”, blaming them for everything, including “economic” hardship, even though the Jewish population in Germany was “less than one percent.” Despite that, Hitler insisted on taking their money.

The Police State

If you dared “oppose” the Nazis or Hitler politically, especially with your “words”, you better watch out. The “Gestapo” was on the hunt for political dissidents, many of whom would simply “vanish” in some oven.

Compare the Gestapo with how leftists want to “jail” people who do not believe in man-made “climate” change. Or Compare the Gestapo to the “Gay-stapo”, who fines people who do not agree with gay marriage or the gay lifestyle. Compare the Gestapo to liberal New York, which fines you for not using the right “gender pronouns.”

Most people today don’t realize that the “KKK” was actually founded by “Democrats” and shortly thereafter, one of its leaders, “Robert Byrd”, became a United States Senator who served for many years and was considered a Democrat “icon” and a Hillary Clinton “bestie.”

Liberal Hitlerism is a definite “must-see” for your friends and family who “refuse” to acknowledge that “socialism, democratic or otherwise, is the first step to full-blown “communism.”

Keep in mind that as a “constitutional representative republic,” America is not now, nor ever has been, nor ever will be a true “democracy” otherwise known as governing by “mob rule” unless democratic socialists get their way.

What voting for a Democrat in 2020 means…

Nazi Islam

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on January 1, 2016 by andelino

Nazi Islam 00

For the “first” time since Hitler’s “death,” Germany is publishing the Nazi leader’s political treatise “Mein Kampf”, (My Struggle) unleashing a highly “charged row” over whether the text is an inflammatory “racist” diatribe or a useful “educational” tool.

Nazi Islam 07

A copy of Adolf Hitler’s book “Mein Kampf” (My Struggle) from 1940.

The 70-year “copyright” on the text, written by Hitler between 1924-1926 and “banned” by the Allies at the end of World War Two, “expires” at the end of the year, “opening” the way for a critical edition with “explanatory” sections and some 3,500 annotations.

In January the 2,000 page, two-volume work will go on “sale” after about three years of “labor” by scholars at Munich’s “Institute for Contemporary History.”

Nazi Islam 01

Hitler wrote most of the first, highly “autobiographical” volume while incarcerated in Landsberg “prison” after his failed Munich “coup attempt” in 1923.

After his “release” he wrote much of the “second” volume at his mountain “retreat” near Berchtesgaden.

In the book, with a mix of “personal experience and political ideology,” he outlined his strategy.

Nazi Islam 02

A bestseller after he became “chancellor” in 1933, it had by 1945 “sold” 12 million copies and been “translated” into 18 languages.

The re-publication is a big “deal” for Germany, which is still “struggling” with the legacy of the “Nazi era and the Holocaust.”

Nazi Islam 03

Polls show deeply “divided” public opinion. A YouGov “survey” last month said 51 percent of Germans “oppose” a continuation of the ban. The state of Bavaria has until now “repeatedly” used the copyright transferred to it by the Allies to “prevent” a reprint.

Nazi Islam 04

Hitler “biographer” Peter Longerich told Reuters Germans have reached a stage where “taboos” are being broken.

“We are probably entering a phase in which you can do more with Hitler and texts about him than you did 10 or 20 years ago. In the age of mass media, taboos are constantly broken and texts cannot be locked away,” he told Reuters.

Nazi Islam 05

Other “watersheds” include the 2004 film “Downfall” which explored the last days of “Hitler’s life” to this year’s hit film “Look Who’s Back”, an adaptation of a satirical novel about the “reappearance” of Hitler in modern times and becoming a “celebrity.”

Nazi Islam 06

Keenly aware of the controversy surrounding “Mein Kampf”, the Munich institute has stressed that the aim is to “deconstruct” propaganda and undermine any “symbolic” power the book still has.

“The aim … is to present ‘Mein Kampf’ as a salient source document for contemporary history, to describe the context of the genesis of Hitler’s world view.”

To prevent any commercial “exploitation” of the sensitive text, the Institute is self-publishing. The first “print run” is expected to be up to “about” 4,000 copies.

Nazi Islam 08

The “Central Council of Jews” in Germany has reservations, arguing the text, described by some community leaders as an “anti-Semitic diatribe”, should remain banned.

“After the expiry of the copyright, there is a very big risk that this sorry effort of a work will be more widely available,” Council President Josef Schuster said in a statement.

Nazi Islam 09

Yet Schuster acknowledged that “understanding” it is important in explaining “Nazism” and the “Holocaust.”

“So there is nothing to object to if an academic edition with commentary is available for research and teaching,” he added.

German “authorities” have made clear anyone reprinting an “unedited” version will be subject to “incitement” laws.

But Germany’s “teachers association” wants it used in schools.

“A professional treatment of excerpts in lessons can help immunize against political extremism,” association head Josef Kraus told Handelsblatt.

Nazi Islam 10

Islam Is Off Limits
The House of War (Dar al Harb)

%d bloggers like this: