Archive for muslims

Syrian War

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on April 11, 2017 by andelino

America Shouldn’t Attack Syria—Russia Isn’t Our Enemy
By Spencer P Morrison

Although “hawkish” Neocons like Ben Shapiro are “rejoicing” that President Trump launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at a Syrian airstrip, I’m not.

Let’s be honest: “the attack was a total waste of money, and frankly, we’re fighting the wrong guys.”

As “bad” as Assad is, he’s a “hell of a lot better” than his “replacements”.

Here’s why “firing” Tomahawk cruise missiles into Syria “was, and is, a bad idea.”

Missiles Are Expensive, Tarmac Is Cheap…

Tomahawk cruise missiles cost $1 million a piece.

Not only that, but the “newer” models that will replace them cost up to “$1.5 million per unit.”

This means that we “wasted” $60-90 million on the attack, not “including” the associated costs, like “deploying” warships in the Mediterranean.

And what did we “use” them to break?  “Tarmac.”

Here’s the deal: “Syria is war-zone, and Assad’s government is essentially a police state.”

Replacing a “runway” will cost Assad next to nothing, assuming he even “pay” people to fix it. It’s not like Syria has a “shortage” of unemployed people,  gravel, or tar, after all.

The Attack Was Pointless…

According to the Daily Mail, Syrian jet fighters took off from the allegedly “bombed-out” runway without issue.

If the goal was “deny” Assad the tactical “advantage” of the airbase, then the attack was a “failure.”

Beyond that, Trump has burned “valuable” political capital with his supporters, who are “divided” over his actions. Many, if not most Americans “want” an end to America’s “involvement” abroad, including spending on foreign aid and the UN, and for them, this is a “step in the wrong direction.”

Assad Is Fighting ISIS & Al-Qaeda For Us…

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t “like” Assad, and I don’t “think” he’s our friend.

But he’s a “hell of a lot more” reasonable than the “moderate rebels” who want to “replace” him, who are backed by “Al-Qaeda, the Islamic State, and the Saudi Arabians.”

The below “clip” is only a minute long watch it.  In it, Assad shares his “thoughts” on the European migrant crisis.

Now “compare” that to this clip of ISIS doing ISIS things like “beheading” Christians and “smashing” Roman artifacts.

Who do you think is more “reasonable?”


As you can see in the below map, Assad’s regime is directly in “conflict” with ISIS over major swaths of territory, “he’s killing them for us.”

Again, why are we “interfering?”

More War Means More Migrants

Life under the Assad “regime” wasn’t great.  But it was “tolerable.”

In fact, before the “civil war,” Syrians enjoyed “higher standards of living” than did their Muslim cousins in “Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine, Egypt, or Iraq.”

Since Syria “disintegrated,” millions of Syrians have “lost” everything, and the “chaos” is spreading throughout the “Middle East and Europe.”

The entire region is “destabilized,” which is causing hoards of “migrants” to flood into Europe.

Sweden, for example, is already on its knees, while Germany has been settled by so many migrants that its entire demographic structure has been altered.

If we want to “solve” the migrant crisis in Europe, we need to “stem” the flow if migrants from the “Islamic” world, letting Assad “regain” control will help do that.

Don’t Poke The Bear…

I do not want “war” with Russia.  Neither “do you.”

Why?  Because Russia is a “nuclear” superpower that could “turn” America into glass.

No matter how “improbable” nuclear war with Russia is, we should nevertheless take “caution” to avoid situations that could “escalate,” because the potential consequences are “ruinous.”

Syria is “just” not that important to us: “it has never been in our ambit, nor is there any reason for it to be.”

On the other side, however, Syria is a “longstanding” Russian ally, and it is home to Russia’s only “navy” beyond Russia proper.

Our “intervening” in Syria is akin to how Russia “acted” during the Cuban missile crisis, except with “live-fire.”

Why “risk” it?

Regime Change Doesn’t Work

Rex Tillerson said that there was no role for Assad” in the future of Syria, “hinting” at the potential for another US-led “regime-change.”

This is an “about-face” from what Trump “campaigned” on, and his “rhetoric” up until now.

Not only is “toppling” Assad a bad idea, since it would further “destabilize” the region and open up a “vacuum” that ISIS, and its affiliates, would “happily” fill, but it would be expensive.

Remember the Iraq War?  It cost America $2 trillion and left thousands of American troops “dead and wounded,” for what?  So that ISIS could “kill” every single Assyrian “Christian or “non-Muslim” they could find?

Regime-change “failed” in Iraq.  It “failed” in Libya.  And it will “fail” in Syria or any other “Islamic” nation.

America Should Stay Out Of Syria & Let Assad Kill ISIS

Whatever you “think” of Assad, we can all “agree” that he’s better than “ISIS.”

We should let him “kill them for us”, rather than “risking our own soldiers,” and spending our “own treasure.”

We have enough problems at home to deal with, we don’t need another “foreign excursion” to divert our attention.

I’m done with Trump
No War on Syria
Trump’s Red Line
McCain – “We Can Bring Peace To Syria” Just Oust Assad.
McCain Selling New Syria War
Graham – 7,000 More Troops Going To “War In Syria”


Tradition of Tolerance

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on February 16, 2017 by andelino


As Obama said so eloquently: “Nothing done in the name of Islam has anything to do with Islam.”

#1. “We Do Not Consider Ourselves A Christian Nation.”

#2. “Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation.”

#3. “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam.”

#4. “I also know that Islam has always been a part of America’s story.”

#5. “I made clear that America is not – and never will be – at war with Islam.”

#6. “Islam has always been part of America.”

#7. “Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance.”

#8. “As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam.”

#9. “I will stand with the Muslim’s should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

What Obama Hates About Jesus

Barack Obama Mocks Jesus Christ

Obama Crushed After Trump Orders White House To Stop His Sickest Tradition

Obama Admits He Is A Muslim

Barack Obama Shows His True Colors As He Leaves Office

And that folks is just the “tip of the iceberg. You can see even more “insane” videos of  Obama Muslim “quotes” on the Internet. That is, if you actually “need any more proof.”


Tolerance is “inherent” in Islam. For example, when a filthy “infidel” wishes to marry a Muslima, he must “accept” Islam, after which he will be not only “tolerated but cherished!”


If a Muslim is born a child by an “unclean” infidel, the child becomes part of “Dar Al Islam” and is subsequently “tolerated and cherished.”

When all become “Islamists,” all will be “tolerated.”


Barack and Michelle Obama used the “race card” at every opportunity to cause “racial tension” and “incite hate and violence.” Both have applied the “Rules for Radicals” written by Communist Saul Alinsky, who was a “community organizer” like Barry was in Chicago.

Typical rule in Alinsky’s manual: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.”

Cathedral Koran Reading

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on February 10, 2017 by andelino


A chaplain to the Queen “resigned” after publicly “criticizing a church that allowed a cathedral Koran reading during its service as part of an “interfaith” project.

Rev Gavin Ashenden, who until this week was one of the 33 special “chaplains” to the Queen, said the reading was “a fairly serious error” and one which he had a “duty” to speak out about.

“There are things we should not tolerate because they are destructive,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Sunday program. “I don’t accept the rather feeble accusation that intolerance is a bad thing.”


During a “service” at St Mary’s Episcopal in Glasgow earlier this month to mark the “Feast of the Epiphany,” there was a reading of a “passage” from the Koran which said that “Jesus was not the son of God.”

The “cathedral” in Kelvinbridge had “invited” local Muslim worshipers to “contribute” to the service, which was “aimed” at improving relations between “Christians and Muslims” in Glasgow.


But police were “called” after members of the church received “hate-filled messages” from far-right “extremists” after the service.

The Bishop of St Andrews, Dunkeld and Dunblane, the Most Rev David Chillingworth, said that the “Scottish Episcopal Church” would review the work of St Mary’s. He said the church was “deeply distressed at the offense which has been caused.”

Dr Ashenden wrote a “letter” to The Times newspaper earlier this week, where he called on the church to apologize to Christians “suffering dreadful persecution at the hands of Muslims” and added that the “denigration” of Jesus in Christian worship would be called “blasphemy” by some.


He told BBC Radio 4 on Sunday:

“The problem with what happened in Glasgow was that although it was presented as a way of building bridges and a way of educating people it was done badly in the wrong way in the wrong place in the wrong context.”

“It should not happen in the holy Eucharist and particularly a Eucharist whose main intention is to celebrate Christ the word made flesh come into the world.”

“To have a reading from the Koran at that point was a fairly serious error for the Christian worshiping community, but to choose the reading they chose doubled the error. Of all passages you might have read likely to cause offense, that was one of the most problematic.”


He said that he had to make a choice between the “important honor” of continuing in the role of “royal” chaplain, and having the “ability” to speak out on matters he felt “strongly” about.

“I think it’s clear to me that accepting the role of chaplain to the Queen does not give one a platform where one can speak controversially in the public space.” 

“So in those circumstances I think one has to choose between whether one wants to accept an important honor or whether one chooses to continue a debate in the public space.”

“I am fairly clear in my own mind that my duty to my conscience, to my order, to my understanding of Christianity and my vocation is that I am supposed to be speaking out in the public space on behalf of the Christ I serve.”

Islamic State of England 06

A Buckingham Palace spokesperson said: “Dr. Gavin Ashenden has tendered his resignation from the honorary position of Chaplain to The Queen. The Royal Household has accepted the resignation with immediate effect.”

Islamic State of England 07

Queen’s Chaplain Who Questioned Quran Prayers in Cathedral Steps Down
Islamic State of England

Trump’s Muslim Ban

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on February 1, 2017 by andelino


Iran on Saturday “condemned” the U.S. visa ban against Tehran and “six” other majority Muslim countries as an “open affront against the Muslim world and the Iranian nation” and vowed to retaliate.

Saudi Arabia will continue to “block” US Citizens to visit on “tourist” visas.


Libya, Yemen and other countries are vowing to “stop” American tourists from “visiting” their countries.


Americans are for the time being still “welcome” to come to the UK unless you are on the “ban” list, although I’ve heard wearing a “burqa” gets you waved straight through customs with no “visa” checks.


Remember to say to as many people in the airport as possible “Islam is a religion of peace” and you should be “allowed” in no problem.


If they ask “how many heads have you chopped off” it’s not a trick question, it’s just for their “records,” as in moderate Britain, “decapitation” is not a reason for refusing “entry” to the county.


Upsetting UK “Muslims” is the only “surefire” way to guarantee entry “refusal.”

Well, disappointing to “lose” my deposit on our Yemeni “beachfront” condo. Last year a “drone” strike and now this.


Spring Break “just isn’t going to be the same.”

This “madness” must be stopped! Sadly, the correct “understanding” of multi-cultural and multi-gender “equality” among the toiling masses is at an “all-time low.”


I hope Air force One  has “retractable” balls or it’s going to be a “painful” landing unless they are made of “solid brass.”

It seems Barack the “Weak and Feckless” has been replaced by Donald the “Bold Warrior.”


Onward to “stamp out” Islamic hegemony! Let the great patriotic “War Part III” begin.

Bill Clinton is a “racist and bigoted” Trump lover judging from this short clip. Who knew? Is anything “sacred” anymore?

The “correct” answer is, of course, that this “truth” is no longer deemed current.



Muslim Survival Guide

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on December 15, 2016 by andelino


“Islamophobia” has been with us long before Donald Trump ran away with the “political” circus and making it “mainstream, fashionable, even patriotic.”


Lots of Muslims are now “confused” and don’t know what to do. Should they “move” back to the Middle East, or “stay” and avoid getting on the “Deportation List?”


Here is President Trump’s “Survival Guide” that Muslims can follow:

  • Start with things a Muslim can do immediately, mostly obvious — changing names, getting rid of beards, Hijabs. Yet this won’t cut it. Muslims need to do more.
  • Be vigilant. Definitely stay away as much as you can from places where Trump’s supporters go — Wal-Mart, Applebee’s or Race-Car tracks.
  • If you are at a football game, stand for the national anthem, not like whiny, ungrateful coward Colin Kaepernick.
  • When traveling, no Arabic books, Arabic conversation or Arabic music or prayer rugs.
  • Don’t ask for Halal meals on flights, especially on international ones. Eat pork if you have to, or ask for a kosher meal. Islamophobia is much worse than anti-Semitism nowadays. 
  • As for praying at the mosque, no more than once a week. The FBI was watching even before Trump. Use the new, invisible Pocket Prayer Mat. It comes in handy in a tight space. I used it just last week on a golf course under a tree.
  • Don’t do the pre-prayer washing of feet in public bathrooms; dry-wash as the prophet did with stones.
  • Hide all Islamic signs and symbols from your car; for some reason they entice road rage.
  • If a police officer stops your car and asks if you were drinking, don’t say “I’m a Muslim and I don’t drink.” Just say yes. DWI is less of an offense than DWM — Driving While Muslim.
  • Walk in groups and don’t stay out after midnight. Islamophobes are like cicadas; they come out after dark.
  • When people at work try to engage you in a political conversation, just comment on the weather.
  • Stop going to ethnic places, like restaurants and malls. Try Amazon; they don’t really care who you are as long as you buy things, and it is nice now to see a drone delivering a book to a Muslim house rather than a Hell-fire missile.
  • And if you find yourself in a Middle Eastern store, and you overhear someone ordering “Hamas,” not hummus, it is definitely not a good sign. Leave the premises immediately.
  • When strangers are nice to you on the phone, it is either a telemarketer or an FBI agent. However, don’t be frightened when Jehovah’s Witnesses come knocking on your door. Invite them in. They may pack a Bible, but most likely not a gun.
  • Pay your bills, rent and car payments on time. Not paying your bills, a sign that you aren’t doing well, may get the FBI’s attention.
  • Don’t walk in your neighborhood alone or without a dog. Allah will forgive you in this case.
  • On social media, don’t post lots of religious or personal things; God doesn’t have time for social-media business. Don’t accept friend-requests from names like Billy, Cliff or Casey.
  • Only travel to states that have legalized marijuana, and steer away from the ones that have just legalized racism and Islamophobia.
  • Keep your eye on those right-wing Islamophobic friends, sure, but the white, liberal Islamophobe friends are the scariest.

And one last thing, if you follow these guidelines, you might be mistaken for someone who actually wants to assimilate into American culture.

Muslim performs “cultural enrichment ” at a public fountain in middle of the street in Italy.

It’s “repulsive” enough watching Muslims perform “wudu” at public restroom sinks, where they wash their “hands, face, nostrils, mouth, and feet” with water before they pray.

This Muslim, however, also washes his “ass and mouth with the same hand.” @TRobinsonNewEra — Jihadi Kermit (@islamlie2) November 14, 2016


ISLAMOPHOBIN – one a day keeps the “Islamophobia” away

American Muslims aim their animosity at Trump, not radical Islam
Hate crimes against Muslims in America rise to slightly above zero
Muslim hate group runs ads saying Donald Trump hates Muslims
Donald Trump accused of stalking Muslim kids in their dreams
Can you guess what’s wrong with America’s largest Muslim charity?

Fear of Muslims

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on July 15, 2016 by andelino

Fear of Muslims 02

Please forward a “link” to this video to help spread the word that virtually all “terrorism” today throughout the world is Islamic and “risk” being called a hate monger for telling the “truth” about Islamic hate mongers.

And keep in mind that term Islamophobia is an “oxymoron” since having a phobia means having an “irrational fear.”

Fearing Islam which wants 80% of humanity “enslaved or exterminated” is totally rational and hence cannot possibly be called a “phobia.”

This video is not “limited” to any one religion but the following is true:

The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The Underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U-S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bali Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theater Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks Bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The First World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay, Mumbai, India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The Nairobi, Kenya Shopping Mall Killers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims
The Sydney, Australia Lindt Cafe Kidnapper was a Muslim
The Peshawar, Pakistani School Children Killers were Muslims

Think of it…

Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
Baha’is living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha’is = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Shinto’s living with Atheists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Baha’is living with Christians = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shinto’s = No Problem
Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Christians = Only a rare problem.
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Atheists living with Hindus = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem


Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Baha’is = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Muslims = Very Big Problem

So this leads to that…

They’re not happy in Gaza
They’re not happy in Egypt
They’re not happy in Libya
They’re not happy in Iran
They’re not happy in Iraq
They’re not happy in Yemen
They’re not happy in Pakistan
They’re not happy in Syria
They’re not happy in Lebanon
They’re not happy in Nigeria
They’re not happy in Kenya
They’re not happy in Sudan
They’re not happy in Morocco
They’re not happy in Afghanistan

So, then where are they happy…

They’re happy in Australia
They’re happy in Belgium
They’re happy in France
They’re happy in Holland
They’re happy in Italy
They’re happy in Germany
They’re happy in Spain
They’re happy in Sweden
They’re happy in Denmark
They’re happy in the USA & Canada
They’re happy in Norway & India
They’re very happy in England (UK)

They’re “happy” in almost every country that is not “Islamic” and has lots of “welfare” benefits.

And who do they “blame?” Not Islam… Not their leadership… Not themselves…they blame the “countries they are happy in.”

And want to “change” the countries they’re “happy” in, to be like the countries they came from where they were “unhappy.”


And this is just “scratching” the surface on Islamic “terrorism.” There are more. Lots more.

“The truth fears no question.”

Thank you from author I.Q. al-Rassooli.

Obama’s Measure Of Success Against ISIS Doesn’t Make Sense


Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on June 19, 2016 by andelino

#TryBeatingMeLightly 08

The “Council of Islamic Ideology” (CII), Pakistan’s 20-member constitutional “ruling” body, recently proposed a “bill” recommending that men bestow a “light beating” onto their defiant wives, and “prohibiting” mixing of the genders in “schools, hospitals and offices.”

The proposal also suggests “interacting with strangers, not wearing a hijab, and speaking too loudly, giving others cash without her husband’s permission,” among other potential activities that might incur a “light beating.”

“A husband should be allowed to lightly beat his wife if she defies his commands and refuses to dress up as per his desires; turns down demand of intercourse without any religious excuse or does not take bath after intercourse or menstrual periods,” the CII bill says, according to Pakistan’s Express-Tribune newspaper.

#TryBeatingMeLightly 03

Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) chairman Maulana Muhammad Khan Sherani addresses a press conference in Islamabad on May 26, 2016.

CII chairman Muhammad Kahn Sherani said: “If you want her to mend her ways, you should first advise her … If she refuses, stop talking to her … then stop sharing a bed with her… and if things do not change, get a bit strict.”

A “bit strict,” he clarified, would include “hitting her with light things like handkerchief, a hat or a turban, but do not hit her on the face or private parts” to instill fear.

#TryBeatingMeLightly 07

The CII’s proposed bill “claims” women will have all the “rights” given to them under “Sharia” law, but prohibits “interaction between unmarriageable kin” (na-mehrams) at recreational spots and offices, and bans “dance, music, and sculptures created in the name of art.”

According to the Washington Post, CII’s proposal “would ban women from appearing in television or print advertising and would prohibit female nurses from treating male patients. It also would give a husband permission to forbid his wife from visiting males other than relatives.”

It also suggests “bans” on various other activities, including women “fighting” in wars. But it allows women to “participate” in politics and become “judges,” and proposes that the “need” for a guardian for “women of age” is not required.

The proposal also says that women should not be “permitted” to receive non-relatives or foreign officials, and they should not use “birth control pills without asking their husbands.”

Proposals by the “Council of Islamic Ideology” are recommendations and are not “applicable” unless passed by legislators.

#TryBeatingMeLightly 11

Earlier this year, the Punjab Assembly, Pakistan’s most populated province, passed a women’s protection bill, granting protection from “abusive” husbands which the CII and religious parties strongly rejected, declaring it “unIslamic.”

The “Khyber Pakhtunkhwa” (KP) government sent a “similar” bill to the Council for review, which also was “rejected” on the basis of being “unIslamic”, and announced it will prepare a “model” bill in response.

The council’s “draft proposal” has met with a “furious” response in Pakistan, including “calls” for the CII to be “disbanded.”

The “Council of Islamic Ideology” is a 54-year-old “advisory” body made up of Islamic “clerics and scholars” responsible for offering “legal” advice to Pakistani “legislators” whether laws are in line with the “teachings of Islam.”

Although CII is part of Pakistan’s governmental “structure,” and provides constitutional “recommendations” to parliament regarding “Islamic” laws, its 163-page proposal is “non-binding” and does not have to be “voted” on by the Pakistani parliament.

Copies of the proposed “163-point bill” have been sent to all provincial “assemblies” at the CII’s recommendations.

Salient points from the proposed bill address “property, marriage, motherhood, crimes, violence against women, apostasy,” and even venture into the instruments of “state acceptable” for a woman to be involved in.

#TryBeatingMeLightly 09

Farzana Bari, “human rights activist” and academic at “Quaid-i-Azam University,” termed the proposed bill “unconstitutional.”

“Allowing a husband to beat his wife, in any way, is against Pakistan’s Constitution and the international laws and treaties that Pakistan has signed and is bound by. This Council is a burden on the Pakistani taxpayer and bringing a bad name to Muslims throughout the world.”

“Not allowing adult women to work and keeping them at home is to treat them like children or property,” she added. “This will take Pakistan further into ignorance.”

Key proposals in the bill
Women will have the right to own property
Women have the right to bequeath property
A husband may, when needed, lightly beat his wife
Three consecutive declarations of divorce will be punishable (punishment unspecified)
A guardian’s permission is not required for a woman who has reached maturity to contract a nikah
A wife has the right to khula if she forfeits alimony
A wife may move the court in case of ‘excesses’ by husband
Contracting a marriage for Vani or dispute resolution is punishable (punishment unspecified)
Contracting a woman’s marriage to a Qur’an will be a crime carrying a ten-year sentence
Ban on the request and display of dowry
Women will be permitted to participate in politics
Women are not responsible for participation in combat missions
It is forbidden to kill a woman in war
Women may become judges
Women will not be permitted to receive foreign officials and state guests
Forcing any woman to convert carries a three-year prison sentence
A woman cannot be killed/executed for ‘leaving Islam’
A woman of sound mind is permitted to convert to Islam
Acid attacks and violent acts against women such as throwing acid on women should be thoroughly investigated
Ban on honor killing, Karo kari, and siyah kari
Work and education
Ban on co-education past the primary level
Co-education past the primary level may be permitted if hijab is made mandatory and free mixing between the genders is not allowed
A ban on women working in ‘vulgar’ advertisements
Female nurses should not attend to male patients
Women should not be forced into difficult, ‘labor-intensive’ work
Mothers must breastfeed for two years
Ban on advertisements baby formula/substitutes for breast milk
A woman cannot use contraception without the husband’s permission
An abortion after 120 days will be classified as murder

Indeed, “violence” against women in The Islamic Republic of Pakistan is “rampant.”

The independent “Human Rights Commission” of Pakistan’s annual report revealed hundreds of “gang rapes, kidnappings, and burnings” and said more than 800 women had committed “suicide” or attempted to.

A Saudi Arabian Family “hung” their Ethiopian maid “upside” down from a hook and “brutally” beat her to a “bloody” pulp. She is “drenched” in blood from the “whips and sticks” that the Saudi men used to “beat” her.

Non-European Foreign workers in the Gulf states are treated as DE-facto “slaves with no human rights” and are kept as virtual “prisoners” by their respective “employers” and forced to endure “harsh treatment” for little pay.

A recent report by “Amnesty International” slammed the worsening state of “human rights abuses” in the country. Among the myriad “criticisms” leveled in the report, it was noted that “migrant” workers and other “minorities” regularly suffer “abuse and excessive use of force” at the hands of authorities.

#TryBeatingMeLightly 04

Ironically, the Islamic law that allows a husband to “lightly beat” his wife is being “sold on the streets” of Toronto and “protested” in Pakistan.

The book distributed in a popular downtown square in Toronto, Canada from an Islamic “da’wah” (outreach) group advocates “wife beating under the right circumstances” and professes that some women may even enjoy being beaten at times as a sign of love and concern.”

#TryBeatingMeLightly 01

Te book in question, “Women in Islam & Refutation of some Common Misconceptions,” was obtained by Jonathon D. Halevi, who wrote an “expose” about the distribution and content of the book in CIJ News.

Halevi “obtained” the book from a booth advertising “Free Info on Islam” operating in Dundas Square.

He notes that the book, written by Saudi scholar Dr. Abdul-Rahman al-Sheha and printed by the Saudi “da’wah” organization the “Muslim World League,” was also handed out at Central Square of York University by “women students” belonging to the Muslim Students Association (MSA), a “Muslim-Brotherhood” linked organization.

Wife “beating” is viewed as the third and final stage of “discipline” used “to treat a wife blameworthy of immoral behavior,” according to the book, which states “how” it should be done.

“Beating without hurting, breaking a bone, leaving black or blue marks on the body, and avoiding hitting the face or especially sensitive places.”

#TryBeatingMeLightly 05

The book goes on to state that, according to psychologists, this “treatment” has proved to be effective with “two types of women”:

“The first type: Strong willed, demanding and commandeering women. These are the type of women who like to control, master and run the affairs of their husbands by pushing them around, commanding them and giving them orders.”

“The second type: Submissive or subdued women. These women may even enjoy being beaten at times as a sign of love and concern.”

#TryBeatingMeLightly 10

The book compares “wife beating to spanking a recalcitrant child” and as a remedy much like “bitter medicine” which an ill person will “gladly take to be cured of their ailment.”

Meanwhile, in Pakistan, in response to the “Council of Islamic Ideology” (CII) proposal that a husband be allowed to “lightly beat” his wife, a hash tag #TryBeatingMeLightly is trending.

#TryBeatingMeLightly 06

Photographer Fahhad Rajper took photos of 12 Pakistani professional women with their promise of what will happen if “beaten lightly.”

See video below and Rajper’s Facebook page…

#TryBeatingMeLightly 02

What Does Islam Teach About Wife Beating
Wife-Beating in Islam
Hijabs in the Workplace: To Wear or Not to Wear?
Florida Prof Endorses Severing Hands, Blasphemy Laws
Lahore Court Restores Divorce for Christian Couples
Satire Against Extremism is Taking the Web By Storm

%d bloggers like this: