Archive for michael flynn

Afghanistan Nightmare

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on September 22, 2021 by andelino

The Afghanistan nightmare continues to haunt us all. It has caused many of us to experience new heights of disbelief and anger. But imagine watching events in Afghanistan as a member of America’s military.

For 20 years, the Taliban, a ragtag collection of roughly 75,000 genocidal sand hill terrorists, was the sworn enemy. More than $2 trillion has been spent fighting Islamist terrorists in Afghanistan since 2001. Nearly 2,500 soldiers have been killed in action, and over 20,000 wounded.

Over the past two decades, more than 800,000 military personnel have served in Afghanistan, many experiencing tremendous pain and sacrifice. The Department of Veterans Affairs estimates that up to 20 percent of veterans of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq experience symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Now imagine being a veteran and seeing two decades of blood, toil, tears and sweat unravel in less than two weeks.

Imagine watching video of Taliban barbarians parading through the streets of Kandahar wearing your fatigues, driving your Humvees, flying your Black Hawk helicopters, carrying your M-16 assaults rifles. Imagine watching giddy terrorists in Kabul drape your flag over coffins in mock funerals.

Imagine watching your government simply hand over to the Taliban $85 billion worth of the most powerful and sophisticated military equipment in the world—hardware and weapons created to give you the advantage and confidence on the battlefield.

Imagine learning that Biden officials just directed federal agencies to erase their websites of official reports and audits documenting how much military equipment America gave to Afghanistan that is now in the hands of the Taliban.

Imagine receiving phone calls or texts from friends in Afghanistan, from Afghan translators and interpreters, and hearing their terrified, hopeless pleas as the Taliban moves door-to-door torturing, raping and executing anyone who supported America.

Imagine learning that, on its way out, your government gave the Taliban a kill list of American citizens, green-card holders and Afghan allies still in the country.

Imagine being a soldier and learning about the irrational decision to slip out of the Bagram Air Base in the middle of the night, and the strategically horrendous decision to evacuate tens of thousands from the airport in urban Kabul.

Imagine watching caskets draped in the U.S. flag, holding the disfigured corpses of American soldiers, being carried from the hold of a C-17 Globemaster plane, and seeing America’s droopy president repeatedly check his watch.

Imagine learning that the request to read in Congress the names of the 13 U.S. soldiers killed in Kabul was denied by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Imagine watching the viral video of Lt. Col. Stuart P. Scheller Jr. passionately articulate his “growing discontent and contempt” with military leadership and the total “ineptitude at the foreign-policy level,” and then learning that Scheller was subsequently demoted, then driven to retirement.

Imagine having friends and family who were interrogated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, even persecuted and jailed, for attending the January 6 political rally in Washington, D.C., but then seeing America’s president walk away scot-free from America’s greatest military blunder ever.

Imagine hearing the Biden administration call the Taliban a trustworthy ally in Afghanistan specifically against ISIS-K.

For those of us not in the military, it’s probably hard to fully comprehend the fury and despair coursing through America’s armed forces.

Not with the Taliban but with America’s government—with “Fraud-In-Chief” Joe Biden and figures like Mark Milley, Lloyd Austin and Antony Blinken. The steady flow of irrational, self-destructive and deadly decisions and policies coming from the upper echelons must be deeply infuriating and demoralizing.

What do you do with these emotions? What are your options?

The military operates on a chain-of-command system of government. Orders made at the top flow through the chain of command and are carried out by soldiers at the bottom. Orders are executed quickly and exactly, and without questions. This form of government is absolutely crucial, and it works well. But chain of command operates on trust, confidence and obedience.

Afghanistan absolutely demolished the trust and confidence many of America’s soldiers have in their top leaders, especially the commander in chief. It’s not just the fatal decisions, it’s the lies and deception, the double-talk, the blatant refusal to accept responsibility. “Fraud-In-Chief”  Biden called Afghanistan an “extraordinary success.”

Sure, it was—for the Taliban.

It is hard to appreciate how difficult this moment is for America’s veterans. What happens when a soldier’s faith and confidence in his superiors vanishes? When there’s little to no trust and confidence in those above you, it is much harder to obey—to carry out your orders. To do your job.

Afghanistan will thrust some into an existential crisis. This crisis has exposed many of America’s top military leaders, not just as ignorant or weak-willed—but as active members of the radical left. What do you do when you begin to realize that the men at the top are corrupt, that they actively support Barack Obama’s goal to fundamentally transform the America you serve and love?

These are some of the questions U.S. soldiers are wrestling with. In the weeks and months ahead, we’ll see how they answer them. Some will no doubt go along with the radical overhaul of the military. Some will accept, perhaps begrudgingly, the military’s embrace of Communist principles and political correctness, the focus on racial and gender equality.

But many, at least at some point, will begin to resist. For some, resistance will mean departure. Expect retirement figures to skyrocket.

But there is another option. This option will appeal to the patriotic veteran, to the serviceman alarmed about the direction of his government and his country. This option is ideally suited to veterans charged with emotions of frustration, fury and despair.

Some might call it a military uprising or coup. But these terms imply unconstitutional or lawless action or movement. Veterans who would support some sort of military resistance against the radical left would argue that they are defending America. They would say that they are protecting America’s Constitution, protecting its Judeo-Christian heritage, protecting law and order. Would they be wrong?

Veterans and active-duty servicemen are among the most patriotic Americans you will find. Many joined the military because they had a strong sense of duty to their nation. They wanted to protect America. At what point will some veterans consider it their duty to protect America by actively resisting the U.S. government and its war on traditional America?

It takes some imagination to see a modern superpower like America experiencing some sort of military uprising. But think, this time last year it was hard to imagine what happened with the national election. America today is in uncharted territory, politically, economically, socially, culturally and militarily. We need to be ready for anything.

How many veterans have the same view as Ross Schambon, a former sniper who served in Afghanistan? Talking about the Biden administration, he said recently, “They just kind of lay down. They’re laying down for everything. Whereas the previous president, he actually had a backbone.”

More than 90 retired generals, admirals and military officers signed a letter demanding the resignation of Joe Biden’s top military and defense officials, including Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley and Secretary of State Antony Blinken. It’s hard to see Biden firing these men, which raises the question ”how far are these retired military leaders willing to go to see their demands met?”

All across America—in state and local elections, on Twitter, in school board meetings, in TikTok videos—we see evidence of a rising dissatisfaction and resentment for “Fraud-In-Chief” Biden and the radical left. Chase bank—following a nationwide backlash—sent a letter to retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn apologizing for canceling his credit cards and bank accounts.

A spirit of resistance and revolt is swelling across America—and in America’s military.

Just imagine you are part of America’s armed forces right now. Who would you prefer to serve, and who do you think is more interested in your safety and in protecting and preserving your America “Fraud-In-Chief” Joe Biden and the radical left, or Donald Trump?

Your legal vote at the polling places will determine the future of America.

Government Insurrection

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on July 4, 2021 by andelino

On January 13, one week before his presidential term expired, Democrats impeached Donald Trump. It was the fastest impeachment in history, based on the ridiculous claim that the president had “incited insurrection” at the Capitol just one week before, on January 6th Joe Biden was then inaugurated, and President Trump left town. Still, the case was brought to the Senate. They couldn’t reach the necessary two-thirds majority, so the president was acquitted. Still, every Democrat and seven Republican senators voted to convict President Trump.

Democrats are trying to prevent Donald Trump from ever holding public office again. Some Republicans dislike the way President Trump disrupted the political status quo; they want to purge the party of his influence. All of these efforts are far more destructive to America than most people realize! Much evidence exposes that radical leftists illegally and treasonously overturned the 2020 election. But a lot of evidence shows that it was not the first election they targeted and manipulated.

When Donald Trump was still a presidential candidate in 2016, radical leftists targeted him, ridiculed him for saying the election could be rigged, spied on their political opponents, worked to cover up their prior actions and to install another radical-leftist administration, and colluded with a biased media to win the election. Yet they somehow still lost the 2016 election. Then they continued a treasonous plot to politically destroy the elected president of the United States. And astoundingly, one of their main weapons was a special counsel—appointed by the Department of Justice in May 2017, led by Robert Mueller—to investigate “interference with the 2016 election.”

This special counsel did not investigate their illegal and unconstitutional actions. It investigated the duly elected president, Donald Trump! Probably most everyday Americans did not believe that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to win the 2016 election. But most probably believed and still believe that Robert Mueller was just honestly investigating to make sure that was the case. The political elites and mainstream media certainly portrayed it that way.

But that is not true. The facts have since proved that. And they show that all these powerful people knew it! They all allowed it to go on as part of their own opposition to what President Trump stood for!

Consider the facts. Barack Obama had set up the agenda before leaving office. His administration tried to help Hillary Clinton win the 2016 election. FBI Director James Comey opened an investigation against Donald Trump, continued the investigation after he was inaugurated president, lied about it, and entrapped and forced out Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn from his position as President Trump’s national security adviser just 22 days after he took office. Flynn would have been in a position to uncover what the leftist deep state had been doing. The Mueller investigation was a way to continue targeting members of the Trump administration and to cover up the truth about what Obama and the others had done and were plotting.

Depending on how you count it, the Department of Justice investigation lasted between 22 months and at least three years—most of the president’s first term—before it finally closed. These people spent years spying on those connected to the president; entrapping his national security adviser; raiding the home, office, hotel and safe-deposit boxes of the president’s personal lawyer; intimidating dozens of people with indictments and threats of indictments. Then they provided zero evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives. That is because the Trump campaign never colluded with Russia.

All this is now publicly known. But few people have connected the dots to realize just what these facts reveal. The mainstream media certainly have not! They have been a big part of covering for this fraudulent investigation.

You’re only going to get real insight from analysts outside the mainstream. On the blog “Conservative Treehouse”, an author who goes by the name of Sundance has connected these dots: “Robert Mueller had two goals as special counsel. Goal No. 1 was to continue the fraudulent Department of Justice/Federal Bureau of Investigation ‘Stop Trump’ operation initiated by James Comey, Andrew McCabe and their crew, technically named Crossfire Hurricane. Goal No. 2 was to bury the illegal action; to create the cover-up needed for everything that took place in the ‘Stop Trump’ operation.”

That second goal is the one most people have overlooked—but it is most important! The Mueller investigation’s goal was not only to keep all the actions against President Trump going, but also to bury all the “illegal” action. People knew that Russian collusion never happened, that Mueller’s investigation had nothing to do with it, and that the investigation was actually a political weapon to “stop Trump.” In fact, everyone in Washington, D.C., knew!

Who All Knew? “They all knew. Every person in every branch of government and every federal agency knew Mueller’s real purpose.” There was abundant proof of what had been going on under the Obama administration and what the “deep state” was doing even after President Trump took office. But Mueller and his team used their power to cover it up and make it much harder to find and prove. And everyone permitted it: “They permitted an illegal, treasonous attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election!”

Think of all the people who had to cooperate for the Mueller probe to be as invasive as it was for as long as it went on, and you begin to realize just how deep this corruption goes.

“That list of everyone includes: Bill Barr, Rod Rosenstein, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Lindsey Graham, Ron Johnson, Chuck Grassley, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Susan Rice, Sally Yates, Loretta Lynch, Mitch McConnell, every member of the Senate Intel committee; every member of the House Intel committee … and yes, including John Durham and every member of every DOJ office everywhere.”

“The legislative branch knew. The judicial branch knew. The executive branch knew. The FISA court knew. All of the insiders knew the Mueller probe was one big vacuum to suck up all of the evidence that would have exposed a corrupt system. They did all of this because the scale of the originating scandal was so severe it would be almost impossible for our nation to cope with the consequences.”

Everyone involved in permitting that investigation knew they were participating in an “illegal, treasonous attempt to overturn the legitimate results of the 2016 election!” That was the purpose of Mueller’s special counsel.

Then what was the purpose of an investigation into zero evidence of something that did not happen? Its purpose was to cover up the illegality of what everybody was doing. “Illegality” means treasonous acts of trampling the Constitution and attempting to overthrow the government of the land! And “everybody” means almost everybody with power in Washington, D.C.!

The complicity among the political class, including Democrats, Republicans, the news media and others, is far deeper than Americans realize. The amount of power, money, influence, technology and intimidation they wield is staggering.

We need to be concerned most of all about that second goal: “to bury the illegal action; to create the cover-up needed for everything that took place in the ‘Stop Trump’ operation.” The deep, deep corruption involved here is now being exposed before our eyes.

The late conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh knew Donald Trump. He said he asked him if he was guilty of the accusations that the Mueller investigation was using as a pretext. President Trump said no. He asked if he was sure. He said he was absolutely innocent. Mr. Limbaugh then said, If you know it’s false, then they know it too.

It was not a legitimate investigation, Mr. Limbaugh said, and Donald Trump may have been the only one in Washington, D.C., who didn’t realize it! He said he tried as hard as he could to convince the president that the whole operation was a political attack on his presidency. President Trump knew he wasn’t guilty of the accusations, but he could not believe that the Department of Justice and the rest of the government was so massively corrupt!

But it was that corrupt! Special Counsel Mueller knew no collusion with Russia ever occurred—and everybody else knew it, too! The leaders at the Justice Department knew it. The leaders at the FBI knew it. The directors of the intelligence agencies knew it. The congressional committees, which have both Republican and Democratic members, knew it. They all wanted to create the illusion that Mueller’s team was looking for the truth, but they never were. They were simply covering up their attempted coup—“their treason against this nation!”

The Democrats and some Republicans knew it was a fake investigation being used as a political weapon. Yet President Trump just could not believe the “scale of corruption” in Washington. He couldn’t recognize that the entire purpose for that investigation was a “treasonous effort” to undo the 2016 election, oppose him politically, and cover up the unlawful, treasonous acts leftists had committed and were committing.

How could radicals keep all their corruption quiet? Why did some Republicans let them? Well, they all live by an understanding there in “the swamp” as Washington’s political class is often called. The understanding is this: “If you don’t go along with the way things are done, the established powers will make sure you lose everything.” That’s why, for example, you see a Republican congressman characterizing Trump supporters as part of a “cult.” He is accusing 75 million Americans of being in a cult—yet thinks the way people in the “swamp” conduct business is good and normal. That’s how sick and warped even some Republicans have become.

Four years ago, Donald Trump was an outsider. He was legitimately elected. He was not one of the political elites, as they view themselves. And he simply could not believe that everyone else with power in Washington was that corrupt. But that is how bad it had gotten, especially after eight years of Barack Obama “transforming” the government.

These people were literally trying to “overthrow” the government of the land! To see the full picture, President Trump would have had to realize that their goal was to cover up the truth about what they were doing. He would have had to realize that even his own lawyers were in on it. Mr. Limbaugh said lawyers like John Dowd were telling the president that the fastest way to make the investigation go away was to cooperate with it. So he did, knowing they would find no Russian collusion. This made it seem legitimate.

In America, “innocent until proven guilty” is a foundational principle of justice. The burden of proof is on the accuser. If someone accused you of colluding with Russia, you wouldn’t have to prove that you didn’t; the accuser would have to prove that you did. “Yet the Department of Justice and the government tried to make Donald Trump out to be guilty unless he proved his innocence.” It was a blatant attempt to overthrow the government! And none of these terribly guilty people is being prosecuted and imprisoned because even the prosecutors and the judges are corrupt!

We now know that the Department of Justice and FBI lied to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court, yet that court never said anything about it. Why is that? Because they are in on it! This shows you the power of the radical left, the swamp and the deep state.

President Trump said he had trouble accepting how deep the corruption truly goes. But consider it: The radicals own education, the news media, entertainment, technology, spy agencies—and now, much of the federal government. They control everything! They can protect lawless rioters and steal an election at the same time they block your free speech for saying that the election was stolen. They impeached President Trump even after he left the White House in an attempt to block him from ever holding office again. Meanwhile, they are rewarding people at the very center of the corruption like former FBI deputy assistant director Peter Strzok—who was in an adulterous affair—and his wife with high-paying jobs and back pay. That’s the way things work in the swamp.

They have the power and the control. How can you win against that? How can you win if they rig the election itself? Where have radicals like Barack Obama gotten so much power? The lies, intimidation and oppression we see in our own government have a powerful source. We saw this with Obama’s use of the deep state in general and the Mueller investigation specifically.

This is how you can have everyone in power knowing that the Mueller investigation is a fraud for covering up what happened surrounding the 2016 election, and knowing what happened surrounding the 2020 election—yet demanding that you say that Mueller was completely honest and the 2020 election was completely fair. They are like a vile religious cult!

One stunning example was ABC commentator George Stephanopoulos actually shouting at a Republican senator, demanding that he say the election was fair! They know that many everyday Americans realize something is wrong. They want to tell you what you can say and even what you can think. And if you don’t obey, they will politically, culturally and technologically exile you as they amass more money and more power.

Many terrible things are going to occur. Already other nations are betraying America, as well as Britain and Israel. Iran is openly threatening to develop a nuclear weapon. It is targeting American soldiers and contracts in Iraq in an effort to humiliate the United States. China is becoming notably more belligerent. It is targeting U.S. allies like Australia and Hong Kong while drawing closer to America’s enemies—holding drills with Iran and backing Cuba.

The change in leadership in America has only made Europe more determined to become more independent. They threw their lot in with China at the end of last year, agreeing to a new trade deal. Germany continues to link itself physically with Russia through the critical Nord Stream 2 pipeline. Our national “lovers” are going to betray us and besiege us. People are looking to Republicans, to conservative commentators and to preachers for hope. The reality is that there is no hope without God.  The choice is yours. You can allow Satan to blot that inspiring plan out of your own mind. You can try to work things out yourself and “do what is right in your own eyes.”

But what is happening to America shows the consequences for those who make that wrong choice.

Treasonous Barack Obama

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on November 27, 2020 by andelino

Why would an American president conspire to “smear” the reputation of an American hero, “overthrow” the U.S. government, and “realign” the nation’s interests with those of the number one “terrorist-sponsoring” nation Iran in the world?

Thomas Jefferson once said, “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.”

A great deal of vital information is being unearthed about which every American must not be ignorant. It reveals unprecedented “corruption” by government officials that is undermining our “freedoms and the political structure of our constitutional republic!”

Americans’ ignorance and lack of concern regarding these truths is making us extremely vulnerable to people who want to destroy this nation. The United States is already dangerously close to becoming a “police state.”

Handwritten notes from former Federal Bureau of Investigation agent Peter Strzok have confirmed that Barack Obama personally directed an “illegal investigation” targeting retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. Flynn is a decorated war hero who has saved countless American lives. But the Obama administration listened in on his phone calls and illegally “leaked” his conversations to the media.

If government agents can “slander and spy” on a well-connected American hero like General Flynn, what can they do to you if they “disagree” with your political views?

After the Department of Justice dropped its case against Flynn on May 7, President Donald Trump said that what President Obama did was “the biggest political crime in American history, by far!” He later added, “ObamaGate makes Watergate look small time!” When the type of tactics Obama was using become routine, your freedoms can be stripped at will. The nation becomes a dictatorship.

“ObamaGate” goes far beyond personal animus between Barack Obama and Michael Flynn. It was a plot to “overthrow” the U.S. government and realign American interests with those of the number one terror-sponsoring state. A number of political analysts have revealed how President Obama tried to accomplish this “devious” goal. But they are at a loss as to why he would do something so evil.

What motivates Barack Obama is a mystery to most analysts. People need to understand what a dangerous threat this is to America’s very foundation! But to understand it, you have to study it. If you do, then events in America will begin to make sense, and you will see how, sadly, this nation’s days are numbered!

Two days after winning the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump met with Obama in the Oval Office to discuss the transition to the new administration. Of the many issues Obama could have discussed with President Trump during their 90-minute meeting, he mainly wanted to talk about two people.

He told Mr. Trump that the two people he really had to worry about were North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un and retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. Why was President Obama so concerned with General Flynn?

Many consider Flynn an American hero. As an intelligence officer in the Army, he tracked down Islamic terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan. He was good at his job, and Obama nominated him as director of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency.

But in this new office, Flynn exposed how the Obama administration was failing to effectively fight the Islamic State and other enemies in the Middle East. He told colleagues that he felt like a lone voice warning that the United States was less safe from radical Islam than before the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

He also criticized Obama for failing to support the enemies of Syrian dictator Bashar Assad, a strong ally of Iran. According to former Defense Intelligence Agency official Patrick Lang, “Flynn incurred the wrath of the White House by insisting on telling the truth about Syria. He thought truth was the best thing, and they shoved him out.” He had been on the job for only two years when the Obama administration forced him into early retirement in August 2014.

But telling the truth about Syria was not the only thing that got Flynn in trouble. He was also a vocal opponent of Obama’s disastrous “nuclear deal” with Iran.

General Flynn was well educated in intelligence-gathering techniques. That unnerved Obama officials. They were doing a lot of “illegal spying” on American citizens, and Flynn was well placed to expose their crimes. Clearly they were nervous about what Flynn might say: “About a year after forcing him to retire, they started to spy on him.”

A former senior Treasury Department official told the Star Newspaper Group that, starting in December 2015 and continuing well into 2017, Barack Obama’s Treasury regularly “surveilled” Flynn’s financial records and transactions. This was “unlawful”, but the Obama administration didn’t care. They were “obsessed” with targeting Michael Flynn.

Obama administration officials told the public that Flynn had illegally “colluded” with Russia. This was a bald-faced lie. So how did Flynn end up as the Obama administration’s prime target? American journalist Lee Smith answered this question in an article for the Tablet, “How RussiaGate Began With Obama’s Iran Deal Domestic Spying Campaign.”

“Why were officials from the Obama administration intercepting Flynn’s phone calls with the Russian ambassador?” Smith wrote.

“The answer is that Obama saw Flynn as a signal threat to his legacy, which was rooted in his July 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Flynn had said long before he signed on with the Trump campaign that it was a catastrophe to realign American interests with those of a terror state. And now that the candidate he’d advised was the new president-elect, Flynn was in a position to help undo the deal.”

In other words, the smear campaign against Flynn had nothing to do with Russia. It was all about stopping Flynn from helping President Trump undo the Obama administration’s Iran nuclear deal!

The Obama administration implemented its “nuclear deal” with Iran on Jan. 16, 2016. Under the terms of this agreement, the United States lifted “oil and financial” sanctions on Iran, while Iran agreed to stop enriching “uranium” beyond 3.67 percent.

General Flynn had left the Obama administration 17 months before, and he was a vocal critic of the deal. He wrote a 2016 book, “The Field of Fight”, describing correspondence between the Iranian government and al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. Apparently al Qaeda was working on “chemical and biological” weapons in Iran, but the Obama administration refused to declassify the proof.

Flynn also warned that the Russians were cooperating with the Iranians and would probably not help the U.S. fight “radical Islamic terrorism.” Still, the Obama administration agreed to let Russia export more than 100 tons of natural uranium to Iran, enough to make 10 nuclear bombs!

Now, the whole message the Obama administration was peddling about the Iran deal was that it would prevent the mullahs from getting a nuclear bomb. Yet they colluded with Russia to give Iran a hundred tons of uranium! What was really going on?

General Flynn condemned Iran as the “world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism” and advocated a strategy aimed at overthrowing the Iranian government. He criticized the Obama administration for trying to align America with the interests of a terrorist state. So when President-elect Trump appointed Flynn as a national security adviser, Obama went to work trying to get rid of Flynn.

As Lee Smith put it, “RussiaGate was not a hoax, as some conservative journalists call it. Rather, it was a purposeful extension of the Obama administration’s Iran Deal media campaign, and of the secret espionage operation targeting those opposed to Obama’s efforts to realign American interests with those of a terror state that embodies the most corrosive forms of anti-Semitism.”

How could the American public be so ignorant as to allow such disastrous foreign-policy decisions?

To smear General Flynn as a Russian agent, Obama’s FBI opened a counterintelligence investigation called “Crossfire Razor.” Having found no evidence of any wrongdoing by Flynn, investigators planned to close the case on Jan. 4, 2017. But then FBI agent Peter Strzok was directed by top officials at the FBI to ensure the investigation of Flynn stayed open.

Court filings in Flynn’s criminal case show that Strzok texted an unnamed associate on Jan. 4, 2017, “Hey if you haven’t closed razor, don’t do so yet.” Strzok’s order was delivered at the behest of FBI leadership, which he referred to as the “7th floor.”

The next day, intelligence officials met in the Oval Office to brief Obama about the findings of their report on Russian interference in the election. Present at the meeting were: Vice President Joe Biden, National Security Adviser Susan Rice, CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and National Security Agency Director Michael Rogers.

After the initial meeting, Obama held a follow-on meeting with Susan Rice, Joe Biden and the two individuals that would retain their positions into the next administration: “Comey and Yates.” This meeting was documented over two weeks later in an e-mail Susan Rice sent to herself immediately after leaving the White House on Jan. 20, 2017.

The Justice Department has disclosed handwritten notes from Peter Strzok recounting what Comey had told him about this January 5 follow-on meeting. These notes show that Obama knew details about private conversations between Michael Flynn and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak that even Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates did not know. This meeting shows that Obama was personally overseeing the effort to take down Flynn.

Strzok’s notes recount how Comey told Obama that Flynn’s phone calls looked legitimate and that Obama told Comey to “make sure you look at things, and have the right people on it.” They also recount how Vice President Biden brought up the “Logan Act,” an 18th-century law that forbids private citizens from discussing foreign policy with foreign governments. The law is likely unconstitutional and definitely does not apply to national security advisers for incoming presidential administrations. But it ended up being key in taking down Flynn.

Obama and his top brass listened in on conversations between Michael Flynn and the Russian ambassador and then accused Flynn of violating an obscure 18th-century law. They then used the transcripts of those perfectly legal conversations to entrap Flynn.

Seven days after the January 5 Oval Office meeting, the Washington Post’s David Ignatius published a story about Flynn’s contacts with the Russian ambassador, and he raised the non-issue of the Logan Act. How did the Post find out about Flynn’s phone calls? The Obama administration had “illegally leaked” that information in an attempt to set up Flynn.

The Post article triggered the mainstream media and Democrat politicians to focus their attention on Michael Flynn.

There was absolutely nothing wrong with Flynn’s phone calls with the Russian ambassador. Consider what a Washington Post reporter, Adam Entous, said during a conference in October 2017. He explained that the newsroom was made aware of the fact that Flynn was having conversations with Ambassador Kislyak, but that it wasn’t worth reporting because, “There’s no reason why he shouldn’t be having that conversation.”

Entous said that Ignatius could write about it because he was a columnist and, “Unlike me as a news reporter, he was able to just throw this piece of red meat out there and just say, ‘There was this conversation. What was it about?’”

By getting the media to write about the Flynn phone calls, the Obama administration was giving the media bait it could use to trap the incoming administration. And it worked.

Flynn could be forgiven for not remembering every detail of each phone call he had with the Russian ambassador. The Obama administration, on the other hand, had transcripts of each of his phone calls and could use the transcripts to entrap him.

Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe recently declassified the Flynn transcripts. In all those transcripts, the word “sanction” appears once, and it was brought up by Ambassador Kislyak. The Federalist’s Sean Davis wrote: “The transcripts show that while Kislyak obliquely raised the issue of financial sanctions against certain Russian intelligence officials, Flynn himself never discussed the financial sanctions against Russian individuals and entities levied by the Obama administration. Instead, Flynn focused on preventing U.S. ‘tit-for-tat’ escalation following the Obama administration’s expulsion of Russian diplomats.”

The day after the January 12 Post article, members of President-elect Trump’s staff were asked by the media about Flynn’s call, particularly about the topic of sanctions. Flynn told his co-workers that he didn’t remember discussing sanctions. Then on January 15, Vice President Mike Pence publicly stated that there had been no talk about economic sanctions between Flynn and the Russian ambassador.

Pence said that Flynn told him that neither sanctions nor the decision to expel diplomats came up on the call. The transcripts of the call do reveal that Flynn spoke to Kislyak about the expulsion of diplomats, however. This miscommunication is what was ultimately exploited by the Obama holdovers to force Flynn’s resignation.

Pence, however, did not have access to Michael Flynn’s transcripts—and neither did Flynn himself. But the Obama administration did. On Jan. 23, 2017, three days after the inauguration, the Washington Post ran an article titled “FBI Reviewed Flynn’s Calls With Russian Ambassador but Found Nothing Illicit.” This article was designed to put Flynn at ease. There was obviously nothing illicit in the phone calls and everyone knew it. But the Obama administration pushed ahead with its plan to catch Flynn in a lie.

On January 24, FBI Director Comey sent Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka to Flynn’s office at the White House. The agents were sent to lay a perjury trap against Flynn. Armed with the transcript of his phone calls, the agents invited themselves into Flynn’s office, pretending they were there to casually talk to him about reports in the media.

Flynn’s “sin” was forgetting that the word “sanction” came up once during a phone call four weeks earlier. Because Flynn denied having a conversation about sanctions, the Obama holdovers determined that he was lying and actively misleading members of the Trump administration. Some even publicly speculated that Flynn would be susceptible to Russian blackmail because of the call.

On January 26, Sally Yates told President Trump’s counsel that Flynn made statements to them about sanctions that were untrue. Flynn continued to publicly state that he did not discuss sanctions. Then on February 9, the Post wrote about the content of Flynn’s phone calls.

Disclosing that information to the press was illegal. Citing “unnamed current and former officials,” the Post reported that Flynn “privately discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia with that country’s ambassador to the United States during the month before President Trump took office, contrary to public assertions by Trump officials.”

“It’s not hard to see why Obama went after Flynn. But why Obama would choose the Islamic Republic as a partner and encourage tactics typically employed by Third World police states remains a mystery.”

The article embarrassed the Trump White House and led to Michael Flynn’s forced resignation on February 13—not because of anything he said to the Russian ambassador, but because he made Vice President Pence look bad by not fully communicating with him about everything he discussed on the phone with Ambassador Kislyak.

The Obama administration swamp holdovers were actively trying to sow chaos for the incoming administration. In the end, they achieved their goal, causing the public to believe that Flynn was trying to cover up some sinister crime with Russian agents. In fact, the whole situation was orchestrated by Barack Obama to protect the Iran nuclear deal.

On May 12, Joe Biden was interviewed on ABC’s Good Morning America. George Stephanopoulos asked him what he knew about the Flynn investigation, and he dogmatically stated, “I know nothing about those moves to investigate Michael Flynn.” Then when he was pressed about his role in the Jan. 5, 2017, meeting, he revised his answer, and said, “I thought you asked me on whether or not I had anything to do with him being prosecuted. I’m sorry. I was aware that they had asked for an investigation, but that’s all I know about it.”

Peter Strzok’s handwritten notes have since revealed both statements to be lies. It was Biden who brought up the Logan Act as a possible means of prosecuting General Flynn. Now the Democrats act like such lies are nothing to be concerned about. But the reality is, lying is the modus operandi of those Obama-era officials!

They called American hero Michael Flynn a clandestine agent of Russia. Such lies are hard to even fathom, yet millions of people believe them. These officials have been repeatedly exposed for this kind of deception. They believe it is right to lie when it is for an “important purpose”! They have no fixed principles. And very few will hold them to account!

America’s Constitution was made to rule a moral, self-governing people, a well-informed people who will hold their leaders to a high moral standard. Ignorant people can never make our Constitution work. The ignorance of the American people regarding what is happening here is disastrous.

Something deadly dangerous has seized the country, far more than people realize. There is a spiritual dimension to what is happening, and you cannot understand these events unless you recognize that. We must know our enemy to understand what is happening in America.

Lee Smith wrote a book titled “The Plot Against the President: The True Story of How Congressman Devin Nunes Uncovered the Biggest Political Scandal in U.S. History.” Smith is an expert on how Obama and his colleagues tried to frame Donald Trump, Michael Flynn and others for crimes they did not commit.

Still, Smith does not understand why Barack Obama so vehemently supported Iran. “It’s not hard to see why the previous president went after Flynn. The retired general’s determination to undo the Iran Deal was grounded in his own experience in two Middle Eastern theaters of combat, where he saw how Iran murdered Americans and threatened American interests. But why Obama would choose the Islamic Republic as a partner and encourage tactics typically employed by Third World police states remains a mystery.”

Iran’s mullahs publicly say they want to “wipe America off the map.” Why in the world would an American president align with these murderers? Why permit Russia to give them 100 tons of uranium? And why implement a deal that virtually guarantees Iran becomes a nuclear power?

Traitor Obama shares the goal to “blot out the name of America”! Through his Iran nuclear deal, Barack Obama was helping them accomplish this goal by transforming America into a socialist state our founders wouldn’t recognize. He wanted to destroy everything good in America and to fundamentally change the nation into a Marxist dictatorship.

Obama decided to “choose the Islamic Republic as a partner” and to use “tactics typically employed by Third World police states” because he wanted to blot out America!

It takes faith to believe what God says in 2 Kings 14:26-27. If God did not intervene to save America “by the hand” of Donald Trump, then America’s republic would have been blotted out, and Iran’s theocracy would probably have an atomic weapon!

We must be able to recognize the devil’s fingerprints on what was taking place here. In John 8:44, the Apostle John records the words of Jesus Christ to the Jews who were trying to kill Him: “You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”

There is no truth in the devil—none at all! And the radical left lie like the devil. That is the spirit behind these people who will say and do anything to accomplish their goals. The way they worked to destroy the life of Michael Flynn, an upstanding American patriot, is chilling proof.

They will stop at nothing to take over the government and align America with the government of Iran. Every time they are challenged on anything illegal they have done, they lie—over and over and over again.

Yet still, when people ask them a question, no matter how outrageous the answer, they somehow believe them! The spirit of deception is troublingly deep. That points directly to the influence of the devil. These people are swayed by the devil!

Satan was a murderer “from the beginning.” Remember Cain and Abel: That first murder in human history was inspired by the devil. From the beginning, Satan was a murderer. This is how he influences people.

The Iran deal had been implemented on Jan. 16, 2016. General Flynn was effectively forced out of the Trump administration a year later. It gives a deep insight into what is happening in America today.

We must see the spiritual dimension here. Ephesians 6:12 says,  For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.”

Satan and his followers hate the light. They work in darkness and secrecy. That is why the devil can use a network like the “deep state” to devastating effect. Something diabolical was going on until President Trump was elected—and it is still going on now.

Iran’s aggressive, terrorism-empowered foreign policy and America’s shameful weakness and deep corruption in its government, will be leading to weapons of mass destruction.

The Obama administration’s efforts to help Iran get a nuclear bomb will be a devastating punishment in the future.

ObamaGate

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on May 13, 2020 by andelino

Obama seems worried about the DOJ dropping the Flynn case, because of what the scandals will reveal about his own “corrupt and treasonous” administration.

As a new presidential election is coming up, and the last time we had one of those, we heard nothing but “Russia, Russia, Russia.” The Democrat media complex spent nearly three years of wall-to-wall coverage trying to convince you that the Trump campaign “colluded” with Russia in 2016 to rig the presidential election.

Now that these allegations have been thoroughly “disproved” the journalists are determined never to revisit the subject again.

But two major events that recently occurred are forcing the “truth” back into the spotlight. One has to do with Rep. “Pencil Neck” Adam Schiff, and the other has to do with Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.

In 2017, Schiff and many other “radical leftists” were telling us through ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post and other media outlets that they had received “direct evidence” of collusion during “closed-door” congressional hearings.

Last week, Schiff finally released transcripts from these hearings. As it turns out, the testimony given under oath in 2017 tells a much different story from what Schiff and others were falsely telling the media.

James Clapper had been the director of national intelligence for President Barack Obama. In his testimony to Congress, he admitted that he “never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.”

Evelyn Farkas was one of President Obama’s senior defense officials. She appeared on MSNBC in March 2017 and said that information about Trump colluding with Russia existed, and she feared that the new Trump administration would destroy it. She encouraged her former co-workers to leak or spread whatever information they had throughout the intelligence community.

Three months later, however, Farkas was asked under oath what “information” on Trump-Russia collusion she was aware of. “I didn’t know anything,” she said. She just “felt” there was such intelligence out there somewhere.

After hearing all of this sworn testimony three years ago, Adam Schiff stepped in front of news cameras over and again, talking repeatedly about the “evidence” he had against Donald Trump.

Even last week, when Schiff released the transcripts, he said they “richly detail evidence of the Trump campaign’s efforts to invite, make use of, and cover up Russia’s help in the 2016 presidential election.”

Even when his “lies” are fully exposed, he continues to “lie.”

On the same day Schiff released the transcripts, another big development occurred. The Department of Justice moved to drop its case against Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.

Obama’s FBI had investigated Flynn for alleged illegal ties to Russia. It was ready to close its investigation on Jan. 4, 2017, a couple of weeks before President Trump was inaugurated and Flynn became his national security advisor.

But the investigation was kept open due to the efforts of agent Peter Strzok, acting on orders from the “seventh floor.” Why did the FBI and Department of Justice keep that case open?

What is gradually being revealed in all of this is far bigger than Flynn or the attorney general or the president.

It has now emerged that the Justice Department’s lead prosecutor, Brandon Van Grack, had evidence that actually “cleared” Flynn. Yet when he told the judge that the department had turned over all the evidence to Flynn’s legal team, that “evidence” was withheld.

Why?

In the motion to dismiss charges against Flynn, the Department of Justice attached about 80 pages of exhibits. Exhibit 4 is an FBI 302 document regarding a Jan. 5, 2017, meeting led by Obama in the Oval Office with Vice President Joe Biden and the administration’s top intelligence officials: “Director Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, NSA Director Michael Rogers, National Security Advisor Susan Rice and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates.”

At the end of the meeting, Obama instructed everyone to leave except Yates and Comey—the two individuals who would be continuing their jobs under incoming President Trump.

According to the FBI document, President Obama himself was very well informed about Flynn’s (perfectly legal) phone call with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. In fact, he was the one who informed Yates about it. “Obama started by saying he had ‘learned of the information about Flynn’ and his conversation with Kislyak about sanctions. At that point, Yates had no idea what the president was talking about, but figured it out based on the conversation.”

Why is this significant?

A couple of weeks later, Trump took office and Flynn was appointed. But because it had an investigation open, the FBI was able to interview Flynn in his office at the White House.

What was the purpose of that interview? To set a “perjury” trap! To try to force Flynn to “resign” almost as soon as he was appointed, and to hopefully lead to a “conviction” against him and a “blow” to the new Trump administration.

And it worked.

Attorney General William Barr was blunt last week about the reason the Department of Justice is now withdrawing its case against Flynn. This was “not a legitimate counterintelligence investigation,” he said. The reason the DOJ and the FBI kept the case open was “for the express purpose of trying to … lay a perjury trap.”

Strzok kept the investigation open on orders from the “seventh floor.” That refers to the highest officials of the FBI: including Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Director Comey himself! Who was over Comey? Yates. And who called both Comey and Yates to the Oval Office and gave them their marching orders immediately prior to the beginning of the Trump administration? “President Barack Obama.”

More and more evidence points to this: The “deep state’s” entrapment of Michael Flynn traces back to “Barack Obama” himself!

The possibility of a sitting president using the nation’s security and intelligence power against his successor is “bombshell” news, no matter who you are or how you look at it. But what has been the media’s reaction to this major news event? Mainstream journalists and other “radical leftists” have not revisited the actual evidence (or lack thereof) against Flynn.

They have instead tried to spin the news cycle into accusations that Barr is subverting “justice” to do President Trump’s bidding.

Obama himself even weighed in over the weekend, saying it was unprecedented for someone “charged with perjury to get off scot-free.” As Prof. Jonathan Turley wrote in response, Obama got it wrong on the charge and on the lack of precedent. But judging by the mainstream news coverage, you’d never know it.

In spite of the incredible power wielded—then and now—by Obama, the deep state and the mainstream media, there are more revelations to come. But from what we are seeing already, it is clear that the “corrupt and treasonous” Obama White House administration is being exposed.

Fearing that recent revelations will reflect badly on his administration Obama has taken to providing talking points directly to his minions rather than filtering them through the usual channels ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WAPO, LAT.

That frees these channels up to carry on with the more important news while the Obamabots take to the Twitterverse to  stoke it up with the Obama directed “Orange Man Bad” meme du jour.

What were the former President’s criticisms? For one he called the current administration’s response to the pandemic “an absolute chaotic disaster.”

“And by the way, we’re seeing that internationally as well. It’s part of the reason why the response to this global crisis has been so anemic and spotty. It would have been bad even with the best of governments. It has been an absolute chaotic disaster when that mindset — of ‘what’s in it for me’ and ‘to heck with everybody else’ — when that mindset is operationalized in our government.”

Because, according to the MSM, there was never any chaotic disasters during the Obama years. And then there was this:

“This election that’s coming up on every level is so important because what we’re going to be battling is not just a particular individual or a political party. What we’re fighting against is these long term trends in which being selfish, being tribal, being divided, and seeing others as an enemy — that has become a stronger impulse in American life.”

Yes….. selfish, tribal, divided, and seeing others as an enemy? Smells like “corrupt and treasonous” Obama liberalism to me.

%d bloggers like this: