How will Britain React

Watching the “weenies” at the U.K.’s “Guardian” react to the Manchester mass-casualty carnage by trotting out the left’s usual meme that “we must not overreact” to the latest atrocity, we may have arrived at a great “clarifying” moment.

Apparently, there is nothing  the “Islamic” terrorists could do that will “provoke” the European left into “defending” the West.  So this will be a very short note.

First, the left, with its “reaction” to Manchester, has lost all “credibility.” Leftists are no longer “relevant,” and should be “treated” accordingly.

Second, Great Britain, in the midst of a “snap election” campaign, has been targeted by the “same folks” who’ve been launching “mass-casualty attacks” on the Continent.

From the reporting, it appears that this was not a “lone wolf” like the guy who attacked Parliament. This was “ISIS” Central.  An appropriate “response“ is required.

Third, thank God that “Caliph” Barack Obama is “not” president.

So what “should” the Brits and the U.S. do? They should do what the Archangel Barack “would not do” after the Paris and Brussels attacks.

Invoke “Article 5 of the NATO Treaty.”  This was done after 9/11. An attack on one is an attack on all.

Last, Prime Minister May, with President Trump’s “support,” should do what George W. Bush “did not do” after 9/11 and “call” for 100,000 British men to “leap” to the colors and “join” the U.K.’s military.

France’s “new” president should do the “same” with his own “men” and his own “army.”

Enough is enough.  As Mark Steyn wrote:

“All of us have gotten things wrong since 9/11. But few of us have gotten things as disastrously wrong as Theresa May, Angela Merkel and François Hollande and an entire generation of European political leaders who insist that remorseless incremental Islamization is both unstoppable and manageable.

It is neither, and, for the sake of the dead of last night’s carnage and for those of the next one, it is necessary to face that honestly. Theresa May’s statement in Downing Street is said by my old friends at The Spectator to be “defiant“, but what she is defying is not terrorism but reality. So too for all the exhausted accessories of defiance chic: ‘candles, teddy bears, hashtags,’ the pitiful passive rote gestures that acknowledge atrocity without addressing it – like the El-oi in H G Wells’ Time Machine, too evolved to resist the Morlocks.

As I asked around Europe all last year: What’s the happy ending here? In a decade it will be worse, and in two decades worse still, and then in three decades people will barely recall how it used to be, when all that warmth and vibrancy of urban life that Owen Jones hymns in today’s Guardian is but a memory, and the music has died away, and Manchester is as dull and listless as today’s Alexandria. If May or  Merkel has a happier ending, I’d be interested to hear it. If not, it is necessary not to carry on, but to change, and soon, before it’s too late.”

It is clear we are not ready to be “serious” about Islam or the demographic “revolution” in the West.

Much of the “liberal” Western media has spent its time talking about how “they will not divide us” and how “we will stand united” and all of that childish, “vapid” nonsense.

We are “looking” at a West that will have no Western “characteristics” in fifteen to twenty years, “zero.”

In other words, we are talking about the utter “destruction” of the West but the current reaction of our “media and political elite” are that we should “all come together” and this will just “fix its self.”

I am glad that these people weren’t my “science” classmates because during the “water and oil” experiment they would have been yelling “why don’t they just mix and come together.”

And after the “teacher” informed them that “water and oil don’t mix,” they would yell at the teacher  calling him a “racist.”

We are asked to “pretend” like this is normal. That it is “normal” that we will have “terrorist” attacks that “kill” ten, twenty or fifty of people “every so often.”

Sadiq Khan, the Muslim “invader” who was made mayor of Britain, said it was “part and parcel of living in a big city” that you have to be “prepared” for terrorist attacks.

Emanuel Macron, the new President of France, is quoted as saying that terrorism is just “part of our daily lives for the years to come.”

Oh yea that’s perfectly normal isn’t it.

Maybe the people of Europe should “consider” the phrase Americans said when they “engaged” in the Second World War, “praise the Lord, but pass the ammunition.”

Here is a “message” the lads in the RAF “scrawled” on their munitions to ISIS.

Let’s admit: Manchester is the ‘new normal’
Facts don’t care about Islamic terrorists’ feelings
Trump triumphs over terrorists in battle of brands
US Intel officials leaked Manchester bomber’s name
Drive them out: Time to deport known American jihadis

Obama’s ISIS Strategy

Obama’s strategy for “defeating” ISIS is to continue “limit airstrikes” against ISIS “training” camps.

President Obama said that U.S. and allied airstrikes are targeting ISIS training camps in Iraq and Syria, but new figures reveal only “20 camps out of 60” were hit in recent months because Obama fears “collateral damage” on his Muslim brothers and sisters.

Since May, U.S. and allied air forces conducted “17” attacks hitting a total of “20” camps in Syria and Iraq, according to the U.S. military “command” in Iraq.

Critics in the Obama administration and U.S. military say ISIS has been operating more than “60 training camps” since 2014 in areas of Syria and Iraq. The camps are said to be “producing” an estimated 1,000 “fighters” a month.

The officials voiced “frustrations” that ISIS training camps are not being “vigorously” struck.

“These camps give them a continuous, fresh flow fighters,” said one official, “and little is being done to destroy them.”

According to the officials, the U.S. military has been “constrained” from attacking the camps because many are located in or near “residential areas and population centers” and the White House fears “strikes” will produce civilian casualties.

Additionally, the flow of “trained” fighters from the camps is “assisting” ISIS efforts to expand its “operations” into placed such as Libya and Yemen.

France’s Le Figaro newspaper reported that ISIS has set up “two major training camps” in the Libyan desert near Houn, about 135 miles south of the coastal city of Sirte.

Long War Journal reported in June that the number of “terrorist” training camps in Syria and Iraq continues to “increase,” for both ISIS and al Qaeda. The journal reported that more than “100 training camps” have been identified in the two Middle East states.

“The proliferation of training camps in Iraq and Syria speaks to the strength of the Islamic State and its ability to continue to gather and instruct recruits despite the U.S. and allies’ air campaign,” said Bill Roggio, editor of the Long War Journal.

“It is unclear if U.S. airstrikes have significantly set back the Islamic State’s training program,” he told the Washington Free Beacon. “We may not be hitting the training facilities quick enough to make a difference.”

Obama, under pressure from “critics” at home and abroad over the “limited” military strategy against ISIS vowed that the U.S. strategy is “moving forward with a great sense of urgency” following ISIS-linked attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, California.

“Every day, we destroy as well more of ISIS’s forces—their fighting positions, bunkers, and staging areas; their heavy weapons, bomb-making factories, compounds and training camps,” Obama said at the Pentagon following a National Security Council meeting.

French military forces have conducted “airstrikes” in recent weeks against ISIS training camps in Syria where “French ISIS fighters” were believed to be training.

The public affairs office at the Combined Joint Task Force—Operation Inherent Resolve said in a statement that the 17 strikes included “five” airstrikes in Iraq and “nine” in Syria.

“In some of these strikes, the training area was not the primary target, so it may not have been specified in our strike releases,” the statement said.

Between May 20 and December 8, the attacks included several “strikes” near Raqqa, where ISIS headquarters is located, against “training camps and staging areas;” attacks also were conducted against a “training area and logistics site” near Dayr Az Zawr; and strikes on “training camps” near Kobani, Mosul, Albu Hayat, and Abu Kamal.

A military statement said a training camp was “bombed” near Raqqa.

Asked about the “low number of training camp attacks,” Army Col. Steven Warren, a coalition spokesman, said, “We have struck training camps and will continue to do so.”

Sebastian Gorka, the Horner distinguished chair of military theory at Marine Corps University, said final “victory” in the current anti-ISIS campaign will not be “measured” by the number of body bags but that “taking out jihadi camps right now is the number one priority.”

“Victory will come when we and our allies have delegitimized the ideology of global Jihadism, but at the moment ISIS is powerful and growing and must be met with decisive force,” he said.

“The rate of U.S. strikes today is infinitesimal in comparison to the First Gulf War and our pilots’ incredibly restrictive rules of engagement mean that they often return to base with ordinance still on their wing struts,” Gorka said. “As long as ISIS has tens of thousands of fighters in theater, this is inexcusable.”

Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio) said during a House Armed Services Committee hearing last month that “key targets, including training camps,” are not being bombed.

“There’s great frustration in the American public as we hear that there are attacks now happening to ISIS, and ISIL training camps that we’ve known where they are but no one’s attacking them,” Turner said.

“Logistic, supply lines, sales of oil, other operations of ISIS and ISIL are going without challenge,” he added. “So clearly the strategy that we’re doing is not working and is threatening our national security.”

The Pentagon recently began hitting “oil facilities and transportation vehicles.”

Ryan Crocker, former ambassador to Syria and Iraq, “testified” at the committee hearing that the U.S. and allied forces should “amp up significantly the air campaign against Islamic State.”

“Paris changed a lot of things and I think it should certainly change how we look at a target list, let’s look at it again,” Crocker said. “If there are key facilities for Islamic State that we’ve identified, we need to go nail them.”

Obama — Disengaged, Delusional, or Diabolical?
While US focuses on terrorism, Taliban set to score major victory in Afghanistan
The next affirmative action group will be Muslims
SYRIAN Al-Qaeda affiliated rebel groups thank the Obama Regime for advanced missile systems
‘WARRIORS’ Barack Hussein Obama and Francois Hollande have a tough new strategy for destroying ISIS
Hey Obama, how’s that strategy to “degrade and destroy ISIS” workin’ out for you?
Obama’s Message To Terrorists

When ISIS Comes Calling

ISIS, ISIL, al Qaeda, Boko Haram, the Taliban, in short Islamic terrorists under all “acronyms” could be confusing the largely “unprotected” American population with its seemingly Islamist terrorist “simpatico” President Obama.

It is not a “stretch” to say that when it comes to the topic of international “Islamic” terrorism, President Obama and the people “differ” as starkly as “night and day.”

Just because there was no official “response” from Obama to the latest “terrorist” threat that they have “71 trained soldiers in 15 states with 23 signed up already for missions” doesn’t mean the unanswered “threat” has left American citizens “quaking” in their boots.

With Obama continuing to set convicted terrorists “free” from Guantanamo Bay; allowing terrorists “into” the U.S. with the ongoing flood of “illegal’s” over the undefended U.S./Mexico border, Americans know that there are likely far more than “71 trained soldiers in 15 states” now hiding in “sleeper cells” across America.

Try as they might, the “Islamic terrorist” camp can’t write off what happened in Garland, Texas: “Police foiled the first ISIS connected terrorist attack on American soil.”

They not “only” foiled it, they foiled it “quickly and effectively.”

No matter how they write up the “scary” script threatening unleashed lions on “courageous” Pamela Geller notwithstanding, the days of Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi being able to “plot terrorist attacks on innocent civilians are gone forever.”

Of all the grisly “beheading” videos sent over the Internet, the most indelible one “trumps” the latest terrorist script intending “to show how easy we give our lives for the Sake of Allah” with one that “irrefutably” proves the lives of terrorists can be “snuffed” out before they get to “carry out” their missions.

Even with the “ACLU, AARP, CAIR” and other American organizations running “interference” for them, even with the “support” of America’s most “anti-American” president in its back pocket, “radical” Islam’s intention to force “Sharia law” on the 300-plus million American population is an “unattainable” pipe dream.

Mullah Obama may be “soft” on terrorism, but Americans, like the people of many other countries, “are not.”

Everything about Obama is “politically” correct politics. Everything about the American people is “liberty and freedom.”

Americans have their own “Christian” God and will never consider “Allah,” the god of Islam as theirs.

Radical Islamist “terrorism” may see Obama as a “friend,” but as a Canada Free Press commenter pointed out, Americans see him as “the greatest PR man to stimulate gun sales.”

“I have lived in Garland. Garland has one of the toughest police departments in NE Texas,” the commenter wrote. “They do not put up with PC ‘nonsense’ of the idiots that think they can attack us.”

Nation-wide there were 65.4 million gun purchases since Obama took office, or 91% “more” than Bush’s first-term total.

According to “data” compiled by the FBI, the number of Americans purchasing guns has “skyrocketed” since Obama was elected.

Waiting “comfortably” in their sleeper cells while taking “advantage” of all the things America has to offer, Islam’s “trained soldiers” must surely have “noticed” by now that Americans, are above all else, “hardy survivors.”

Even the “terrorists” must have noticed that while, just like them, 50% of Americans take full “advantage” of all the Big Government “hand outs,” the other 50% at whom Obama has “thrown” everything but the “proverbial” kitchen sink, have “survived” him.

Islamic “terrorists” may think that with the many “benefits” extended them by Obama, America is easy “pickings,” or that their evil “beheading” videos have utterly “cowed” its population through “intimidation and fear,” but they are wrong.

The terrorists may “assume” Americans are just sitting back “waiting” for the next “promised” attack.

They are, “indeed” sitting back waiting, but “locked and loaded.”

Remember when Monty Python got all those “death threats” for that one “blasphemous” movie? And all the Lefties shouting “Hey, I support free speech, BUT …. “? Good times are coming.

Many websites & TV shows aren’t “showing” the prize-winning “Mohammad” cartoon in their publications.

Help fix that by “sharing” this drawing “around” the Internet.

Saving Lives in Garland and elsewhere
It’s the War Theology, Stupid!
A Jihadist’s Funeral in Kansas City
Coming To America

Female Soldiers

Radical “Islamists” who decide to embark on “suicidal” missions often do so with the “expectation” they will be rewarded with “72 virgins” in Allah’s Whorehouse, if they die in battle.

However, it turns out there is one major “caveat” to the scenario, according to a U.S. lawmaker.

“That is, if they are killed by a woman, the deal is off.”

Rep. Ed Royce (R-Calif.), chairman of the House International Relations Committee, told the New York Post, “These Islamic State (ISIL) soldiers apparently believed that if they were killed in battle, they went to paradise as long as they were killed by a man.”

The issue is of some “relevance,” especially in Iraq, where female “recruits” are among the ranks of the “Kurdish Peshmerga” forces, now fighting the Islamic State “jihadist” group.

“These female soldiers were communicating their satisfaction with the fact that they had taken the fight to ISIL and had stopped the advance, turned back the advance — slayed a number of these fighters, who would then run away.”

Royce said adding that the “female” fighters have been fighting “very bravely.”

Royce said he heard at a “meeting” with the Kurdish foreign minister that female fighters were “laughing” when they saw “Islamic State jihadists” flee from them.

“I think the Islamic State were more afraid of us than of the men,” a female Kurdish fighter named Tekoshin told AFP, the New York Post noted. “They believe they’ll go to hell if they die at a woman’s hands.”

The female “peshmerga” fighters are now on the front lines “against” the Islamic State “jihadists.”

Al-Monitor reported that there are “four” female battalions, including some “recruits” who are mothers, while the highest “ranking” women are colonels.

“We are now on the battlefield, but I’m married and I have a daughter, whom I left with my parents to fight against extremists. I’m happy to perform my national duty to defend Kurdistan,” one fighter told Al-Monitor.

A woman from an “elite” unit of female Kurdish Peshmerga fighters “trains” in Sulaimaniyah, 160 miles (260 kilometers) northeast of Baghdad, Iraq.

Some Kurdish women living in Northern Iraq are training to be “peshmerga,” as the self-ruled Kurdish region’s militia is known, to fight against the “imminent” threat of Islamic “militants” and to protect their land.

Any woman ISIS “captures” becomes a slave. She will be “horribly tortured and abused.”

This Kurd woman, Arin Mirkan, decided to “die” fighting than allow “herself” to be captured.

A female Kurdish “commander” in the embattled city of Kobane in Syrian Kurdistan “killed” an unknown number of Islamic State (ISIS) fighters in a “suicide” attack.

The London-based “Syrian Observatory for Human Rights” (SOHR) said the woman, who was from a unit of the “People’s Protection Units” (YPG), broke into an ISIS “bastion” around the eastern outskirts of Kobane, or Ayn al-Arab in Arabic.

R.I.P. Hero Arin Mirkan.

She “clashed” with enemy fighters, fired “grenades” and then “detonated” herself with a grenade.

Another young woman also decided to kill herself than to face “capture” by ISIS.

Ceylan Ozalp, 19, a Syrian Kurdish female “combatant,” was reportedly “surrounded” by ISIS fighters near the Syrian Kurdish city of “Kobane” also known as Ain al-Arab.

After she “run out” of ammunition Ozalp said “goodbye” over the radio and spent her “last” bullet on killing herself.

R.I.P. Hero Ceylan Ozalp.

Ozalp was “featured” in a BBC report. She is the one “speaking” via translator at the 1:00 minute mark.

One of these “Kurd” women are worth more than “all of the Islamic terrorists” put together.

Around a “third” of the Syrian Kurdish “force” is made up of women. On the front lines they “fight” alongside the men, taking the same “risks” and facing the same “dangers.”

“Women are the bravest fighters,” says Diren, taking refuge from the “scorching” heat in the cool of an “underground” bunker.

She and three comrades are having lunch: “flat bread, cheese and watermelon.” Many of the fighters, like Diren, 19, are still “teenagers.”

“We’re not scared of anything,” she says. “We’ll fight to the last. We’d rather blow ourselves up than be captured by ISIS.”

Like the followers of the Islamic State, most “Kurds” are Sunni Muslims. But that is where the “similarities” end.

Diren says that, to the “fanatics” of ISIS, a female fighter is “haram”, a anathema: “a disturbing and scary sight.”

“When they see a woman with a gun, they’re so afraid they begin to shake. They portray themselves as tough guys to the world. But when they see us with our guns they run away. They see a woman as just a small thing. But one of our women is worth a hundred of their men.”

The Ultimate Weapon

Modified excerpts from “The Woman’s Guide to Second Adulthood: Inventing the Rest of Our Lives”, chapter “Confronting Adversity” pg. 151-153 by Suzanne Braun Levine.

Take all American women who are within five years of “menopause.”

Train us for a “few” weeks, outfit us with “automatic weapons, grenades, gas masks, moisturizer with SPF15, Prozac, hormones, chocolate and canned tuna.”

Drop us by “parachute” across the desert “landscape” of Syria, and let us do what “comes” naturally.

Think about it.

Our anger “quotient” alone, even when doing standard “stuff” like grocery shopping and paying bills, is “formidable” enough to make even armed “terrorist” in turbans tremble.

We’ve had our “children,” we would gladly “suffer or die” to protect “them and their future.”

We’d like to get “away” from our husbands, if they haven’t “left” already.

And for those of us who are “single,” the prospect of finding a “good” man with whom to “share” life is about as likely as being “struck” by lightning.

We have “nothing” to lose.

We’ve survived the “water” diet, the “protein” diet, the “carbohydrate” diet, and the “grapefruit” diet in “gyms and saunas” across America and “never” lost a pound.

We can easily “survive” months in the “hostile and barren” terrain of Syria with “no food at all!”

We’ve spent years “tracking” down our husbands or lovers in “bars, hardware stores, or sporting events.”

Finding Islamic State (ISIL) “terrorists” in some cave will be “no problem.”

Uniting all the warring “tribes” of Syria in a “new” government?

Oh, please … we’ve planned the “seating” arrangements for “in-laws and extended families” at Thanksgiving dinners for years … we understand “tribal” warfare.

Between us, we’ve “divorced” enough husbands to know every “trick” there is for how they “hide, launder, or cover up” bank accounts and money sources.

We know how to “find” that money and we know how to “seize” it … “with or without” the government’s help!

Let us “go and fight.” The Islamic State (ISIL) terrorist “hate” women.

“They believe they’ll go to hell if they die at a woman’s hands” without enjoying any of the 72 “virgins” in Allah’s Whorehouse.

Imagine their “terror” as we crawl like ants with “hot-flashes” over their “godforsaken” terrain.

American women are the “best” fighters in winning the “War on Women.”

Defund Planned Parenthood

“Planned Parenthood” is the largest “provider and promoter” of abortion, yet they “receive” over 360 million of “your” tax dollars each year.

As a “non-profit” their budget is in “excess” of $1 billion.

They performed 328,308 “abortions” in the US last year and did so with our “tax“ dollars.

We must “stop” this!

The pro-life “boost” from Election Day just months ago has given the “pro-life” movement extra “momentum” and we must “act” now if we want to “remove” all government “funding” from Planned Parenthood.

America’s biggest “abortion corporation” has so many tendrils in “We the People’s” paychecks that it’s hard to “determine” all the steps necessary to “uproot” it.

But that is not “stopping” the new Congress from “moving” to end public funding of “Planned Parenthood.”

LifeNews reports that 80 members of Congress have reintroduced the “Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act” for consideration in the House of Representatives.

The “head sponsor” is Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.), a regular leader on pro-life and freedom-of-conscience legislation.

As Black puts it, “this legislation would simply clarify the original intent and spirit of the law to ensure that Title X federal funded grants will no longer be awarded to ‘health care’ providers that fail to protect life by providing abortions.”

“Title X” is not the “only” vehicle by which Planned Parenthood uses the government to “dip” into Americans’ income.

The corporation received $655,000 in public money to be a “navigator” for ObamaCare in 2013, plus $75 million through the “Personal Responsibility Education Program” (PREP), a creature of ObamaCare, allegedly for “sex” education.

Parents should keep in “mind” that even if this money is on the level, Planned Parenthood’s version of sex education is horrifying.

In its latest annual report, Planned Parenthood “quantifies” the total tax money it “received” at $528.4 million, or “41%” of its total revenue, with 327,653 “abortions” committed.

At a “conservative” estimate of $451 for the “average” abortion, that makes about $150 million in “revenue” directly from “ripping” children apart.

The chances of Barack Obama “signing” the “Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act,” assuming it gets “through” the Senate, are “nil.”

Candidate Obama in 2008 “promised” Planned Parenthood that if he was elected, the “first thing I’d do” is sign the “Freedom of Choice Act,” a bill to “codify Roe v. Wade” by nullifying every “abortion restriction” in America.

At another “speech” to Planned Parenthood in 2013, Obama, the first “sitting” president to officially address that corporation, closed by saying, “Thank you, Planned Parenthood, and God bless you.”

But the strategy of “daring” Obama to “veto” a host of “pro-life bills” could “pay” dividends.

Americans “out of the loop” on this issue may then get the opportunity to see how “radically” pro-abortion Obama is, and perhaps get a “primer” on how science indisputably shows that “pre-born” children are in fact “innocent” human beings.

Those who are for “snuffing” out those lives, be it by “vacuum aspirator, by forceps, or by poison,” should be given every “possible” opportunity to “defend” that position.

Overheard on the Street…

OK, so let me get this straight. Getting an abortion is a “choice”, right? If it’s a “choice”, then that means that it’s elective, not essential. Since it’s elective and not essential, then let them pay for it. not us taxpayers.

Color me clueless, but hasn’t the left’s narrative always been for the govt. to “stay out of their wombs”? De-funding PP would do just that! Govt. doesn’t tell you what to do and it doesn’t pay for what you do with your womb. I mean, c’mon! Seems like a fair deal to me.

The late Joseph Sobran once said that legalizing abortion in order to get government out of the bedroom is like legalizing cannibalism in order to get government out of the kitchen. Hard to argue with that.

The ever-quotable Sobran also noted, in another context, that calling a person who kills babies for a living an “abortion provider” is like calling Osama bin Laden a “terror provider.”

What does a “Islamic Terrorist” and the White House “Abortion Provider” have in common?

They are both “Muslim” killers.

Top 12 Reasons to Defund Planned Parenthood Now

Your Tax Dollars At Work

The United States is offering a $5 million bounty for the “recapture” of an Islamic terrorist it “freed” six years ago who returned to the “jihad” campaign after attending a Saudi “rehab” program for militants.

Ibrahim al-Rubaysh, a Saudi national, was “released” in 2006 under a Saudi program “endorsed” by President George W. Bush and continued “full-throttle” under President Barack Obama, “Judicial Watch” reported as it “highlighted” a State Department “announcement” of the reward.

It “turns” out that al-Rubaysh is the “poster child” for the Saudi rehab’s “failures.”

He’s a “dangerous” al-Qaida operative based in Yemen and now, “years after freeing him,” the United States wants him “captured” again.

Saudi Arabia, the “birthplace” of Islam, started its “rehabilitation” program to try to “reform” violent jihadists by “teaching” them that they “misinterpreted Islamic law by committing acts of terrorism.”

However, the program has widely “failed” to keep the militants from returning to “terrorism” after they graduated from the “program,” Judicial Watch noted.

Al-Rubaysh, who was “held” at the U.S. detention center in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is now a “senior” leader of “al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula” (AQAP), the State Department said.

“He serves as a senior adviser for AQAP operational planning and is involved in the planning of attacks. He has served as a senior AQAP sharia official since 2013, and as a senior AQAP sharia official, al-Rubaysh provides the justification for attacks conducted by AQAP,” the State Department added.

He has called for “attacks” against U.S. targets and the Saudi “royal” family.

Judicial Watch called the new “global dragnet” for al-Rubaysh an “unbelievable story” that comes as President Barack Obama “frees more and more terrorists” as part of a 2008 campaign promise to “close” the Guantanamo prison.

The Long War Journal, which tracks “terrorists,” explained that al-Rubaysh was first “captured” by Pakistani authorities in late 2001 and “turned” over to the Bush administration.

He was “confined” at Guantanamo until he was “transferred” to Saudi custody in December 2006 and “placed” in the “rehabilitation” program. He later “escaped and fled” to Yemen.

In its “reward” announcement, the State Department listed al-Rubaysh and the Egyptian group, Ajnad Misr, as “specially designated global terrorists.”

That listing “freezes” any assets they might “hold” in the United States and “prohibits” Americans from “dealing” with them.

Taking out the Islamic garbage.

Your taxpayer dollars at work!

Five million bucks to the “jihadists’” friends and family, wherein said “enemy combatant” is guaranteed three “halal squares, prison dawah, a Qur’an, prayer mat and a laptop.”

It speaks to the “abject failure of rehabbing” jihadists. The idea that we can “reform” violent jihadists “by teaching them that they misinterpreted Islamic law” is absurd.

These “jihadists” can give classes in Islamic “texts and teachings” and why “what they are doing” is exactly what is “prescribed” in the Qur’an.

Why not just “kill” these savages? They don’t have any “mercy” on non-Muslim so why should they be “treated” any different?

It would be much “cheaper” than $5 Million Dollars.

Greetings from Hawaii.

Helping Wounded, Murderous ISIS Fighters Get Back on the Battlefield

Torture Songs

Just “imagine” for a second that you are “alone” in a small dark room with  your “head” chained between your legs and “forced” to listen to the same song “again and again” for number of hours and days with “headphones” which you can’t take off.

Music “torture” has been “normal” practice for the CIA after it started its “improved examination program” to replace “water boarding” in the early 2000’s.

The U.S. Psychological Operations team member Sgt. Mark Hadsell, said:

“If you play it for 24 hours, your brain and body functions start to slide, your train of thought slows down and your will is broken. That’s when we come in and talk to them.”

So, basically the CIA captured “terrorists” are tortured with an “awesome” Spotify playlist?

Wow, sounds “humane” in comparison of having your “head, arms and legs” chopped off by those “fanatic“ and barbaric “ISIS” Muslim pigs.

Here are some songs the CIA used to “torture” prisoners:

Okay, the “Barney” and “Meow Mix” are a tad “weak.”

And the “Dope” and “Fuck Your God” songs are a tad “intense.”

I can see the “Satanist-death-beheading” crowd not being fully on “board” with it.

But let’s remember, this is “torture” after all.

They can’t all be “enjoyable.” You’re being punished for “terrorism” not turning down a “stag” party.

Obama, Guns, and Children

Looks like Obama is attempting to “heal” the young boy of a kidney stone while the girl is trying to “liberate” the kid from his “wallet” in the back pocket…

After “trotting” out young children as the “backdrop” for his “gun control” rollout yesterday, the White House released videos today of young children reading “anti-gun” letters to the camera.

“No guns, no guns, no guns, no guns!” pleads one little girl, Hinnah. “My opinion is it should be very hard for people to buy guns,” says little Julia. “It’s a free country, but I recommend there needs to be a limit with guns,” says little Grant. “I thought I would write to you to stop gun violence,” reads little Taejah.

It was already “despicable” for Obama to “exploit” children as a backdrop for his “political” posturing, “implying” that his “opposition” on useless gun control laws somehow “cares” less about children.

Now he’s taken the next step, “using” children as “spokespeople” for his agenda. Enjoy…

My inside source at the “White Castle” intercepted some written letters from “pee wee’s” Obama did not want to make public.

As you can read, there is a reason why he did not want us to see them…

Dear Mr. President Obama,

I am 7 years old and “scared” to go to school because I “drew” a picture of a stick gun last year and got in “big” trouble. The Principal would not let me “go” to school for 6 weeks. I was told I was “bad” for drawing a picture. If the picture of the gun is so “scary” I would like to have pictures of “real guns” on the school doors to keep the bad “people” away. Is that OK?

signed, Jon

Dear Mr. Obama Sir,

My Mommy and Daddy have a “lot of guns” and we all have “fun” when we watch them “shoot” on the gun range. I have heard “you” and your friends says guns are “bad” and you want to take “away” guns and bullets. Do you know that Mommy and Daddy would not be able to “protect” me and my baby sister from “bad” people? Would you send your FBI men to “protect” my Mommy and little sister then?

signed, Taurus

You gotta love this…just like the Islamic “terrorists” using children to do their “dirty” work. I don’t know whether to be ashamed of Obama or ashamed of the parents of these kids who “allowed” their children to be “exploited” to further a “political” agenda…

I wonder how much the parent(s) of these urchins were “compensated” for allowing their children to be used for “propaganda” purpose?

Isn’t “brainwashing” children a form of child “abuse?”

Scaring kids with something they know nothing about. They have no opinion on the issue, they can only repeat what they are told. Just like the Nazi Youth in Germany. Unbelievable…

Obama, Guns, and Children
(sung to the tune of “Lawyers, Guns, and Money” by Warren Zevon)

There’s violence in Connecticut
Chicago streets are red
The guns are taking over
My heart is filled with dread

There’s bitter clingers clinging
To their religion and their guns
Assault gun sales are booming
Thank God we’ve got the One

Obama, guns, and children
He’s gonna save the day
Obama, guns, and children
He’ll make it go away

The NRA is looming
With crazy LaPierre
And Alex Jones is screaming
Lord, get me outta here

Nobody needs assault guns
Or big-clip magazines
Our police will protect us
Or maybe the Marines

Obama, guns, and children
He’s gonna save the day
Obama, guns, and children
He’ll make it go away

With 23 new EOs
And a big tear in his eye
He’s takin’ care of business
The right wing’s gonna fry

Obama, guns, and children
He’s gonna save the day
Obama, guns, and children
He’ll make it go away

Glorious Day

The Day has come for Obama to cash in his 2012 “landslide mandate” and release the 166 inmates in Guantanamo and turn them into full fledged “American Citizens” under the new immigration “amnesty” plan.

No more will they be forced to put up with Cuban “sand fleas” and “dengue fever.” They will now enjoy all the amenities of Federal Prisons from New Jersey to Seattle, stocked with soccer fields, Internet access, drag queens and plenty of potential American recruits.

What a fantastic “backdoor” idea of getting them into the US where they can be then “defined” as having Constitutional rights and a civilian trial. Not to mention the opportunity to “infiltrate” and spread “violent radicalism” among our home-grown Muslims “wannabe” terrorists.

Next thing you know, when “Islamic” Nazi terrorists “nuke” a US city the 166 will be allowed to be “exchanged” for  kidnapped American Contractors in Pakistan.

My suggestion is to “transfer” all 166 terrorist to a Prison facilities near the California “home” of Diane Feinstein to make weekly “conjugal visits” more cost effective.

Elections of “stupid” people have consequences!

The lunatics are running the asylum…