Archive for islam

Sounds of Silence

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on November 22, 2017 by andelino

Paul Simon’s somber rendition of “Sound of Silence” in remembrance of the attacks by Islamic terrorists of 9-11 2001.


Weinstein converts to Islam

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on November 1, 2017 by andelino

Qasim Rashid, attorney and casting director for Islamic Women in Entertainment International, says Harvey Weinstein has converted to Islam and agreed to head the newly-formed Rotherham Studios United Kingdom.

RSUK’s first project will be a feature-length Muslim feminist action film about community warriors who preempt the sexual abuse of women through the strict application of Islamic law. The working title of the film is rumored to be “Majority Report.”

According to Rashid, secular state laws have failed to protect women because they only punish the actor once the act is completed, they don’t prevent the act in the first place.

“That’s where Islamic films can help,” he said. “States are not moral actors but people are, and any expectation that we can simply pass a law to stop sexual abuse is foolish. Islamic teachings and the Prophet Muhammad’s example provide a solution that no state truly can.”

RSUK’s goal is to present Islamic concepts to movie audiences in a graphically exciting way, said Rashid, who provided a few pages from the script of “Majority Report.”

Based on verses from the Quran, the script establishes a world where women are equal beings, protected by a community of men who provide for every financial, sexual, social, and fashion need. When threatened by a counter-Jihad of Buddhist, Hindu, and Judeo-Christian invaders, the Islamic community warriors respond by ensuring that women maintain autonomy and self-determination.

“This involves a lot of harems and preemptive beheadings,” said Rashid, “but we’re confident the Motion Picture Association will change the current X rating to PG-13. Either that, or we’ll just release the film on YouTube.”

Weinstein was unavailable for comment at press time, but Rashid said he would make the producer available under his new Islamic name for a future interview.

“We can’t yet reveal Weinstein’s new name, but if revelations about his sexual abuse shocked you, then you’re dangerously ignorant to reality,” Rashid said.

“The greater disease is arrogance, unaccountability, societal apathy. Male sexual abuse of women will only decrease when men stop abusing women. Islam and Prophet Muhammad provide a practical solution, and RSUK will do its part to bring that solution to the world.”

Qasim Rashid writes in The Independent that the Weinstein affair could have been prevented if we would all follow the rules of the woman-friendly religion of Islam.

I think this “glorious” article deserves its own “screen” cap.

Qasim Rashid seems very “rational and uninhibited” by the Western world around him. We will need ones like him for our future.

Islam is the answer! Because headless, dead women cannot be raped! OK, technically they can be, but who in their right mind would do that beside perhaps Mohammed, who “raped” Aisha when she was 9 years old.

Abuse could have been “prevented” if Harvey Weinstein were a Muslim and “treated” women as potted plants.

In fact, the only way for Weinstein to “revive” his career and win back the “feminists is to convert to Islam.

How the teachings of Islam could help us prevent more sexual abuse scandals

Can Islam Help Us Prevent More Sexual Abuse Scandals?

The Perfect Man

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , on June 19, 2017 by andelino

A billboard “exposing” the truth about “The Perfect Man” can be seen from the southbound lanes of I-465 on the east side in Indiana. It’s drawing “huge” attention from motorists.

At the bottom of the billboard in yellow reads “Educate Truthophobes.” A search of “Truthophobes” online leads to multiple “anti-Muslim” groups, specifically an Australian group with “similar” messaging.

Islamic “leaders” in Indianapolis are “challenging” those responsible for “The Perfect Man” billboard saying it is “offensive.”

Indiana Muslim representative Andre Carson said he believes the billboard is “untrue” and that the billboard’s author takes Islamic “text and history” out of context just like “Al-Qaeda, ISIS and the Klan do to religious texts to justify their bigotry.”

Interestingly, Muslims and Dhimmis are bitterly “bitching” about this billboard which they imply is “dissing” the Prophet  Muhammad, although neither “Muhammad” nor “Islam” is mentioned?

How do those “critics” connect the billboard to their “Prophet  Muhammad?”

According to “Educate Truthophobes” Islam, being a “false and malicious” contrivance, is extremely “fragile.” It cannot withstand “questioning or criticism.”

So, who is “The Perfect Man”? 

Wikiislam:  “In Islam, the Prophet Muhammad is known as al-Insān al-Kāmil (the perfect human) and uswa hasana (an excellent model of conduct). “

In the Qur’an 33:21: Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much. If you want to get into Jannah, you better meet Allah on good terms when Judgment Day rolls around. So who should you emulate and what did he do?

Married a six year old

While Khadija was alive, Muhammad did not dare to take another wife. After her death, he married Sauda, a widow. Shortly thereafter, he married the six year old daughter of his bosom buddy, Abu Bakr. Instead of reinventing the wheel, I direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to this blog post which quotes the muttawir ahadith relevant to the marriage to Aisha.

Imran Firasat created a graphic novel based on the story, watch it here:


No, it ain’t on the billboard, would not fit. Muhammad did not consummate the marriage until Aisha was nine years old. In the interim, he was practicing “Mufakhathat.” He was “thighing” the little girl! Read about it here, including a link to a fatwa permitting thighing “cuz it is sunnah!”

Beheaded 600 Jews in one day

The number is “inexact” cuz the records only give us a range.

Wikiislam: “The Jews were made to come down, and Allah’s Messenger imprisoned them. Then Muhammad went out into the marketplace of Medina, and he had trenches dug in it. He sent for the Jewish men and had them beheaded in those trenches. They were brought out to him in batches. They numbered 800 to 900 boys and men.” Ishaq 464

The quote is from Guillaume’s translation which you can read here. The story is told in Sahih Bukhari.

 Slave owner and dealer 

A slave owner had “declared” his will that his slave be “emancipated” on his death. Muhammad seized the “slave and sold” him. You can read about it in Sahih Bukhari .  Muhammad owned a “black” slave, read about it in vol. 8.


Muhammad had “nine” wives and used to “visit them all in one night” meaning he had “sex” with all of them. Read about it in vol. 7.  Read more about his wives here.


Sad but true. Muhammad took “sex slaves” from among the captives. Safiya was one of them.

Tortured and killed unbelievers

Safiya, whose “rape” was mentioned above, was the bride of Kinanna, chief of the Jewish settlement at Khaibar Oasis. Muhammad had him “tortured” to discover the location of their gold. When Kinanna remained “silent,” Muhammad had him “killed.” Read about it in “The Life Of Muhammad.” The story is on page 515.

Wikiislam:  Kinana b. al-Rabi’, who had the “custody” of the treasure of the B. al-Nadir, was brought to the apostle who asked him about it. He “denied” that he knew where it was. A Jew came (Tabari says “was brought”) to the apostle and said that he had seen Kinana going round a certain “ruin” every morning early. When the apostle said to Kinana, “Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?” he said Yes. The apostle gave orders that the ruin was to be “excavated” and some of the “treasure” was found. When he asked him about the rest he “refused” to produce it, so the apostle gave “orders” to al-Zubayr b. al-‘Awwam, ‘Torture him until you extract what he has,” so he kindled a fire with “flint and steel” on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle “delivered” him to Muhammad b. Maslama and he “struck off his head” in revenge for his brother Mahmud.

In Islamic law, slander is “anything the hearer might not like”, the hearer being the subject.  Muhammad is dead; he can’t “hear” what is on that billboard and cannot “see” it.

In Islamic law, “truth” is not a defense against accusations of “slander.” But we are not under “Islamic” law. At least not yet.

Rima Shahid, Executive Director of the “Muslim Alliance of Indiana.”

“It is a horrible billboard. I’m outraged by it, but saddened at the same time. I would like to know who is behind it. It seems very cowardly to me. If you have some kind of stance, you should want to stand up next to your statement. I didn’t think there was any room for hate in our city. This billboard tells me otherwise. This kind of rhetoric just furthers division in our state and makes a neighbor question a neighbor, just like I am today.”

This is “proof” that the billboard speaks the “truth.” Let’s start a “campaign” to have these billboards in every “city” in America.

Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah – The Life of Muhammad Translate

Warehouses of Jihad

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on June 15, 2017 by andelino

How Muslims Take Control of America
By Amil Imani

They do it first by establishing “mosques” in every town and city. These meeting places are “perfect” warehouses of not only “indoctrination,” but future “terrorists” cells who are made to “read and understand” the principles of “jihad, martyrdom, and Dar-al-Harb” meaning “land of war” – any place not Islamized.”

Mosques cost lot of “money,” and the money for these warehouses of “hate” is coming straight from “Saudi Arabia.” These mosques are being “infused” with an activist “strain” of Islam, Wahhabism.

If you have to ask “where” the Saudis are getting their money, you are not “paying” attention…it’s coming from “you.”  According to The Mosque in America: a National Portrait,” a survey released in April 2001, there were at “least” 1,209 mosques in the U.S.  Today, it’s “estimated” that that number has “quadrupled.”

Mosque Leaders Promote Sharia

Mosque “elders” tend to be sent to the U.S. with one clear mission: “make Sharia law the supreme rule within the United States, using any and all tactics necessary.”

Next, from within the “safety” of their local mosques, they begin to use their “revolting practices, riotous youth, and wild sermonizing” to force genteel Americans to “relocate” to safer, less threatening “neighborhoods” and cities.

Of course, not all Americans will “move” or can afford to do so.  To take “control” of a town, Muslims will not need to “evict” everyone.  They probably need about “25%” in order to make life very “unpleasant” for those who do “not go along” with their demands.

Political Islamist Infiltration

They will “elect” Muslims to all positions of “local” influence, who will “create and enforce” policy according to the Quran.  Once they have “control” over a town, they will begin to establish “informal” Sharia law, and there’s nothing the “government” can, or will want to, do about it.

Sharia law is the “brutal” means by which Islam controls its populations by “force, intimidation, and punishments” for offenses to Allah.

Already, in many European countries, national governments have, “out of fear,” given Islamic fascists the right to “establish” their own shadow governments within the “borders” of countries like Sweden, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, France, and England, where they can “control” their own populations without “accountability.”  Proposals for “Sharia laws” are being already “implemented”  in Canada and the USA.

This is an “admission” that Islam is not “just” a religion.  It is a “deadly” cult.  It seeks “total” control over a person’s “mind and body.”  As such, “our” Constitution is totally “incompatible” with it.

Muslims will “push” politicians for local control and “self-determination” of their own laws.  In this way, America will become two nations: “a weakened traditional one and a growing, menacing Islamized one.”

Islamists Ally with Leftists

At the same time, Muslims will ally with leftist politicians, who will gladly cede some of their “power” to this group of enforcers, so “conservative” politicians and Christians who advocate “self-defense and sane social policies” are kept out of office.

Money that was once “used” to build mosques will now be used to “buy” politicians.  On university campuses, “Islam” will be portrayed as “righteous and peaceful,” while Christianity will be associated with “evil Western and American values.”  Rebellious American “youths” like BLM, OWS, Antifa, etc. will “eat” it up.

There will be “increasing” local and regional incidents of “crimes and threats” against Christians, Jews, and “anybody” who speaks out against the “religion of hate.”  Terrorism is a completely “legitimate” tool of Islam and was widely “practiced and advocated” by Muhammad.

Remember: all words in the Quran are “perfect, immutable laws defining an eternal ethic”:

Against them (the unbelievers) make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly. Quran 8.06

Leftist “politicians” will continue to hold the “Bill of Rights” over anyone who dares to “accuse” Islam of “wrongdoing.”  Islamized “citizens” will ignore skyrocketing “crime and threats.”  They will look the other way for “fear of retribution, honor killings, and punishments” from those who “uphold” the Islamic requirement to seek “revenge” on anyone who “dishonors or disagrees” with Islam.

Eventually, America will become “weakened,” and politicians will allow “Muslims” to do whatever they want, as long as the “infidels” are allowed to be free of “terrorist” threats.  As Christianity “wanes,” people will reject it as an “anachronism” irrelevant to modern trends.  Islamic “ethics” will prevail, and Muslim “sects” will gain members, money, and influence.

Islam Will Destroy Our Constitution

As government policies “lean” toward Islamic ideals, the Bill of Rights will be seen as “archaic” and out of touch with “contemporary” values and the new “direction” of the country.  It will be just a “piece of parchment” in a museum, lacking anyone who would be so “bold and revolutionary” as to fight a religion, even a “religion of hate and killing.”

Regrettably, a vast “ignorance” prevails in this sphere.  Academic “liberal pundits, leftist journalists, hired Islamic apologists and useful idiots” proclaim that Islam is a “religion of peace” and that the great “majority” of Muslims are not a “party” to any plans and actions of “radicals.”

Islam Is Irreconcilable with Our Culture

So how do we “stop” this sequence of events?  How can “our” government, which has so effectively protected the “rights” of peaceful religions, protect us from an “aggressive” one?  How should we put “Islam” out of business?

“By massive allocation of an educational campaign while simultaneously declaring Islam for what it is: an ideology irreconcilable with our core beliefs enshrined in the universal declaration of human rights and the United States Declaration of Independence and Constitution.  By treating Islam the way we treated Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan, and Maoists.  By preventing Islamization of our country by all legal measures and staunchly resisting the creeping sharia in our society.”

It is time to “realize” that not all religions “are” the same.  If a religion does not “recognize” the constitutional “rights” of others, it must “lose” its rights under First Amendment “protections.”

If it “seeks” to control all aspects of our life by “force and fraud,” or if it seeks “exemption” from national laws protecting “constitutional” rights, then it must not be “considered” a religion.

It must be called “something” else, and it cannot be “recognized” as a protected “ideology” under the First Amendment.

“O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: they are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guides not a people unjust.” Quran 5:51

“Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despite-fully use you, and persecute you. Matthew 5:44

Any “religion or dogma” that seeks to create its own “government” and its own “legal system” and seeks to “mobilize its own militia” is not interested in separation of “church and state” and has no right to use that “separation” to create hegemony.

In fact, such a “doctrine” is not even a “religion” at all.  It is a “totalitarian regime” and must be considered the “enemy” of everything Americans believe in.

I’d welcome an “inspection” of other religions to “determine” if they are truly “peaceful,” and I am “confident” that all other faiths will remain “protected and unaffected” because religions tend to be “peaceful.”

There is only one “faith” that seeks global “hegemony” for a seamless “church-state” government and “imposition” of its law everywhere, and that’s Islam, the “Religion of Peaceful Killing.”

Obama & Turkish Dictator Erdoğan Open The Largest Turkish Mosque In The World in USA
Political Islam ‘Incompatible’ with Constitution

Muslim Inbreeding

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on May 25, 2017 by andelino

Up to half of all Muslims are “inbred.” Shocked? You should be. Nevertheless, it is “true.”

How is that “possible,” and why is it so “prevalent?” These questions should be “asked” and asked “loudly.”

As “scandalous” as this topic may be, people seem to be “unaware” of its commonality in the Middle East as a “social” practice.

With increased “immigration,” what was once “taboo” is now becoming common “knowledge” in Western nations, thanks to “Islam.”

British geneticist, Professor Steve Jones of the University College London, stated in relation to Muslim inbreeding “It is common in the Islamic world to marry your brother’s daughter, which is actually genetically closer than marrying your cousin.”

WikiIslam, the online resource on Islam states that:

“A BBC report discussed Pakistanis in the United Kingdom, 55% of whom marry a first cousin. Given the high rate of such marriages, many children come from repeat generations of first-cousin marriages. The report states that these children are 13 times more likely than the general population to produce children with genetic disorders, and one in ten children of first-cousin marriages in Birmingham either dies in infancy or develops a serious disability.”

Could these numbers “influence” people’s behavior? Could there be a “link” between genetic changes in one’s brain chemistry and the “desire” to commit terrorist atrocities? What about “raping” women and children?

These are reasonable “questions” to ask considering that most physicians agree that “marrying” within one’s immediate family has “deleterious” effects on their offspring’s health, specifically their “mental and emotional health.”

Could the “scourge of rape” that has swept across Europe since the advent of the “migrant” crisis be contributed, at least in part, to the peculiar “mental proclivities” that are concomitant to “incest and inbreeding?”

Aside from “terror acts and rape” that may be attributable to “genetic” defects associated with “incest,” what, if anything, does this mean for “future generations of children born in the West?”

Professor Jones avers that “inbreeding” in Islamic communities was “threatening” the health of “generations of children.”

The “facts” speak for themselves and the “consequences” are very real.

“British Pakistanis, half of whom marry a first cousin, a figure that is universally agreed, are 13 times more likely to produce children with genetic disorders than the general population, according to Government-sponsored research. One in ten children from these cousin marriages either dies in infancy or develops a serious life-threatening disability. While British Pakistanis account for three percent of the births in this country, they are responsible for 33 percent of the 15,000 to 20,000 children born each year with genetic defects.”

Shockingly, in Bradford, England, a recent survey of 1,100 “pregnant” women in the city showed that 70 percent have “husbands” who are first cousins.

50% of these people are “Pakistani.”

“Common problems associated with inbreeding with first cousins are blindness, deafness, blood ailments like sickle cell anemia, heart, liver, kidney problems, along with a whole host of neurological disorders and genetic abnormalities that can be passed on to future generations are also very common problems.”

Of course, as is now “common” in Europe, doctors, police officers, media personnel and politicians, are afraid to raise “awareness” about this “health crisis” for fear of being labeled “racist.”

To add to this “lack” of spinelessness on the part of “public” officials and social “servants” to address this “burgeoning” health crisis, most Muslim “girls” find themselves in a situation where they are expected to “marry when they are young and in their teens.”

With no chance of being able to “break away” from their parents, they are married off to their “male” cousin under the guise of “preserving the family’s money, jewelry, and livelihood.”

If both of the prospective parents have a “mutation” in their genetic makeup, then the child has a 25% chance of “suffering” from serious complications associated with “inbreeding.”

Some “imams” in England have spoken out about this “risky” practice and it has caused the rates of “cousin-to-cousin” marriage to drop, if only slightly.

However, the practice “remains” high in the Middle East and those that “immigrate” to Europe bring with them the perceived “normalcy of marrying within one’s family.”

Conversely, CBS News seems to “disagree” with the findings of the doctors in the UK.

Robin Bennett, who headed a study on “first cousin” marriages, told ABC News “that the risks of having a child with a cousin were about ‘2 to 3 percent’ above the average population’s risk for having a child with birth defects or mental retardation.”

Slate magazine concludes something similar to ABC News.

“Now a study by the National Society of Genetic Counselors says that having a child with your first cousin raises the risk of a significant birth defect from about 3-to-4 percent to about 4-to-7 percent. According to the authors, that difference isn’t big enough to justify genetic testing of cousin couples, much less bans on cousin marriage.”

This does not take into account the “compounding” problems of an ever-closer “gene” pool, however.

Slate continues by saying, “Many genetic diseases are caused by recessive genes. To get the disease, you have to get the bad gene from both parents. The greater the genetic similarity between your parents, the greater your chance of getting two copies of the bad gene.”

This view is in line with Mohamed Walji who runs a health center in Balsall Heath, Birmingham. He claims that if both parents “carry the same mutations, there is a one-in-four chance of having an affected child, which can result in anything from a mild disability to a catastrophic illness or a miscarriage.”

Unfortunately, this is “nothing” new in the Muslim world. Such “mating” practices have been going on since the “founding” of the Islamic religion itself.

As the story goes, Zaynab bint Jahsh “married the Prophet Muhammad when she was thirty-five years old, but only after her previous marriage, which had been arranged by none other than the Prophet, had ended in divorce. She was his cousin.”

Muhammad also had 19 “wives and concubines,” one of which he married when she was “6 years old.” Her name was Ai’isha. To his “credit,” he waited to have “sex” with her until she was “9 years old.” He was “54 years of age” at the time.


If that does not “bother” you, it is doubtful “anything” ever will.

Maybe Muslims use the “actions” of Muhammad as “justification” for their own actions?

Presumably, the justification for “marrying” one’s cousin, whether it be a first cousin or a more distant one, hinges on “social acceptance” of the act itself.

Westerners do not “condone” cousin marriages because it is deemed “incestuous” and a form of genetic “Russian roulette.”

The Victorian era deemed “kinship” marriages as an “egregious” taboo not to be broken. Are we now “transcending this long-standing prohibition?”

In the United States, first cousin marriage is legal in some states and “illegal” in others. Perhaps not surprisingly those states that “permit” such marriages are in the “deep south” and in liberal “blue states” like California, New York, and Connecticut.

As was evidenced recently in Sweden, a combination of “incest, pedophilia,” and all of the dictates of “spousal abuse” that accompany different aspect of “Sharia” law are becoming normalized in the West.

“A court in Sweden has ruled in favor of a marriage between a 14-year-old Syrian Refugee and her 21-year-old husband, who is also her cousin. The court made the ruling on the basis that the teenager appears to be ‘mature,’ as well as for religious and cultural reasons.”

She is now pregnant.

Allahu Akbar

Muslim Inbreeding: Impacts on intelligence, sanity, health and society

Allahu Akbar

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , on May 17, 2017 by andelino

Why do Muslims always shout “Allahu Akbar” when they carry out a “terrorist” attack?

The videos  below will help you argue “against” Muslims and their leftist useful “idiots” when they say “terrorism has nothing to do with Islam.”

Answer:  “Allahu Akbar” means “Our god is greater than your God.”

Below, you will find a list of “opinions” about Islam that you may “express” if you’d like to. The list is extensive, but not comprehensive.

If you feel the “need” to say any of these things, you “have” that right.

  1. Islam appears to be a religion designed for pigs.
  2. The world would be a much better place without Islam.
  3. If every religion in the world, aside from Islam, grows in popularity, it will bring about a neutral or positive change. But if Islam grows in popularity in proportion to the other religions, it will bring about a negative change.
  4. The worst thing about Israel is that Islam is practiced there.
  5. The reason the West is superior to the Middle East in every imaginable way is the simple fact that the Middle East has been far more influenced by Islam.
  6. Mohammed is a fictional character. But if he were real, he’d be contemptible.
  7. The Quran is more useful as kindling than as a spiritual guide.
  8. I despise Islam.
  9. I will never participate in any Islamic ritual.
  10. If God could pee, he would pee on the Quran.
  11. Various forms of Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, and other religions will be practiced in the distant future. Islam will be forgotten.
  12. The only thing that would stop me from having kids is the fear that they could be influenced by Islam.

The INEVITABLE DEMISE of the Islamic World

Syrian War

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on April 11, 2017 by andelino

America Shouldn’t Attack Syria—Russia Isn’t Our Enemy
By Spencer P Morrison

Although “hawkish” Neocons like Ben Shapiro are “rejoicing” that President Trump launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at a Syrian airstrip, I’m not.

Let’s be honest: “the attack was a total waste of money, and frankly, we’re fighting the wrong guys.”

As “bad” as Assad is, he’s a “hell of a lot better” than his “replacements”.

Here’s why “firing” Tomahawk cruise missiles into Syria “was, and is, a bad idea.”

Missiles Are Expensive, Tarmac Is Cheap…

Tomahawk cruise missiles cost $1 million a piece.

Not only that, but the “newer” models that will replace them cost up to “$1.5 million per unit.”

This means that we “wasted” $60-90 million on the attack, not “including” the associated costs, like “deploying” warships in the Mediterranean.

And what did we “use” them to break?  “Tarmac.”

Here’s the deal: “Syria is war-zone, and Assad’s government is essentially a police state.”

Replacing a “runway” will cost Assad next to nothing, assuming he even “pay” people to fix it. It’s not like Syria has a “shortage” of unemployed people,  gravel, or tar, after all.

The Attack Was Pointless…

According to the Daily Mail, Syrian jet fighters took off from the allegedly “bombed-out” runway without issue.

If the goal was “deny” Assad the tactical “advantage” of the airbase, then the attack was a “failure.”

Beyond that, Trump has burned “valuable” political capital with his supporters, who are “divided” over his actions. Many, if not most Americans “want” an end to America’s “involvement” abroad, including spending on foreign aid and the UN, and for them, this is a “step in the wrong direction.”

Assad Is Fighting ISIS & Al-Qaeda For Us…

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t “like” Assad, and I don’t “think” he’s our friend.

But he’s a “hell of a lot more” reasonable than the “moderate rebels” who want to “replace” him, who are backed by “Al-Qaeda, the Islamic State, and the Saudi Arabians.”

The below “clip” is only a minute long watch it.  In it, Assad shares his “thoughts” on the European migrant crisis.

Now “compare” that to this clip of ISIS doing ISIS things like “beheading” Christians and “smashing” Roman artifacts.

Who do you think is more “reasonable?”


As you can see in the below map, Assad’s regime is directly in “conflict” with ISIS over major swaths of territory, “he’s killing them for us.”

Again, why are we “interfering?”

More War Means More Migrants

Life under the Assad “regime” wasn’t great.  But it was “tolerable.”

In fact, before the “civil war,” Syrians enjoyed “higher standards of living” than did their Muslim cousins in “Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine, Egypt, or Iraq.”

Since Syria “disintegrated,” millions of Syrians have “lost” everything, and the “chaos” is spreading throughout the “Middle East and Europe.”

The entire region is “destabilized,” which is causing hoards of “migrants” to flood into Europe.

Sweden, for example, is already on its knees, while Germany has been settled by so many migrants that its entire demographic structure has been altered.

If we want to “solve” the migrant crisis in Europe, we need to “stem” the flow if migrants from the “Islamic” world, letting Assad “regain” control will help do that.

Don’t Poke The Bear…

I do not want “war” with Russia.  Neither “do you.”

Why?  Because Russia is a “nuclear” superpower that could “turn” America into glass.

No matter how “improbable” nuclear war with Russia is, we should nevertheless take “caution” to avoid situations that could “escalate,” because the potential consequences are “ruinous.”

Syria is “just” not that important to us: “it has never been in our ambit, nor is there any reason for it to be.”

On the other side, however, Syria is a “longstanding” Russian ally, and it is home to Russia’s only “navy” beyond Russia proper.

Our “intervening” in Syria is akin to how Russia “acted” during the Cuban missile crisis, except with “live-fire.”

Why “risk” it?

Regime Change Doesn’t Work

Rex Tillerson said that there was no role for Assad” in the future of Syria, “hinting” at the potential for another US-led “regime-change.”

This is an “about-face” from what Trump “campaigned” on, and his “rhetoric” up until now.

Not only is “toppling” Assad a bad idea, since it would further “destabilize” the region and open up a “vacuum” that ISIS, and its affiliates, would “happily” fill, but it would be expensive.

Remember the Iraq War?  It cost America $2 trillion and left thousands of American troops “dead and wounded,” for what?  So that ISIS could “kill” every single Assyrian “Christian or “non-Muslim” they could find?

Regime-change “failed” in Iraq.  It “failed” in Libya.  And it will “fail” in Syria or any other “Islamic” nation.

America Should Stay Out Of Syria & Let Assad Kill ISIS

Whatever you “think” of Assad, we can all “agree” that he’s better than “ISIS.”

We should let him “kill them for us”, rather than “risking our own soldiers,” and spending our “own treasure.”

We have enough problems at home to deal with, we don’t need another “foreign excursion” to divert our attention.

I’m done with Trump
No War on Syria
Trump’s Red Line
McCain – “We Can Bring Peace To Syria” Just Oust Assad.
McCain Selling New Syria War
Graham – 7,000 More Troops Going To “War In Syria”

%d bloggers like this: