Archive for foreign policy

Foreign Policy

Posted in uncategorized with tags on May 17, 2022 by andelino

A sequel far worse than the original.

“The worst foreign-policy blunder in American history.” That is how the Trumpet’s editor in chief described the Iran nuclear deal—the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action agreement—that went into effect on Jan. 16, 2016. The agreement gave one of America’s fiercest adversaries immediate access to over $100 billion, $1.8 billion of which was in cash.

It permitted Iran’s development of ballistic missile technology, which it will develop to eventually hold a nuclear warhead. And astoundingly, it gave Iran a legitimate path to obtaining a nuclear weapon in little over a decade. Read more at “The Worst American Foreign-Policy Blunder 2”

Dopey Saudi Prince

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on November 22, 2016 by andelino

saudi-butt-hurt-05

Dopey Prince Alwaleed bin Talal.

It isn’t that the “dopey” Saudi Prince is “upset” that his $25 million donation to the “Clinton Family Crime Foundation” isn’t worth the “paper the check was written on.”

The “real” problem now is that he no longer will be able to “influence” Washington’s foreign policy, nor “spread” Islam into American schools by “financing” along with Qatar “Common Core” and giving schools “free” history textbooks filled with “Islamic” propaganda.

saudi-butt-hurt-04

In December 2015 Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal “slammed” Donald Trump for proposing a temporary “ban” on Muslim immigrants in the US until the government could alleviate ”security” concerns.

Prince Alwaleed called Donald Trump a “disgrace” for his popular plan.

saudi-butt-hurt-01

Donald Trump responded to the “malicious” attack.

saudi-butt-hurt-02

Trump was “right.” Saudi Arabia has “banned” any Syrian immigrants from its country due to “security concerns, the same “concerns” Donald Trump had.

Now the dopey, “butt hurt Prince Alwaleed wants to “kiss” Trump’s ass.

“President elect @realDonaldTrump whatever the past differences, America has spoken, congratulations & best wishes for your presidency.”
— الوليد بن طلال (@Alwaleed_Talal) November 9, 2016

Alwaleed would be a “sandnigger” riding a camel were it not for sheer “luck” that the Saudi “dictatorship” sits on dunes of oil.

saudi-butt-hurt-06

saudi-butt-hurt-03

Dopey Saudi Prince wants to set Trump feud aside

Vetting Hillary Clinton

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on October 6, 2015 by andelino

Hillary-Vegas-top-640x480

The “coronation” of Hillary Rodham as presidential “nominee” for 2016 is proceeding apace if the “debate” schedule provides any evidence.

The first Democrat “debate” is scheduled for October 13th. So far there are only “two and a half” prominent candidates and two “near-unknowns,” so the events might best be called the “Hillary and Bernie” hour.

With only “five” debates scheduled, a coalition of the usual network suspects is in line “au gauche” starting with “CNN” in October and ending with “PBS” in early Spring.

Still, there are now a many “doubts” about Hillary’s nomination and more than a “slew” of questions about her “electability.

Nonetheless, short of a “criminal” indictment and “prison” term, she will probably make it to the “Democratic” debates.

In the spirit of the “transparency” so often promised in the Obama era, the following list of “voter” questions are recommended to “media” panelists.

Given the “sympathies” of the interlocutors, however, there is no “expectation” that these questions will be “asked or answered.”

195266_5_

On Women’s Issues:

1. Your husband’s staff created the neologism “bimbo eruptions” to describe Bill’s affairs at the Arkansas State House and the White House. If “bimbo” is a fair characterization of your husband’s lady friends, what would you call a woman who tolerates, enables, or excuses a philanderer?

2. Do you think elected officials should risk the dignity of high office or the integrity of security officers (State Police and Secret Service) to solicit or exploit naive and vulnerable girls?

3. Perhaps you are aware that the Secret Service has been used as cover for sexual escapades of former presidents that include Jack Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, and your husband. Will that practice continue if and when a woman becomes president?

4. Will your husband have female interns as helpers or assistants in a Hillary Rodham White House?

5. Do you still think a presidential dalliance is a private matter, therefore protected, behavior?

6. If extra-marital sex is a private or protected behavior, should lying about such affairs before a grand jury be considered perjury?

7. Has your husband’s license to practice law been restored in any state?

8. By any fair assessment of recent history, your husband and Huma Abedin’s spouse are serial predators and/or serial flashers respectively. What role will these men have in a Hillary Clinton campaign or White House?

9. If Donald Trump’s rhetoric is abusive, how should we describe your husband’s, or Anthony Wiener’s, actual behavior with women?

10. Are Bill and Tony “ill” in some clinical sense or are there larger moral, character, or judgment issues in play with these men?

11. Do you or your husband still believe that you are victims of a “vast right wing” conspiracy?

Vetting Hillary 01

On Foreign Policy

1. In the Obama era, the Israeli Prime Minister came to the US on more than a dozen occasions. During the same period, President Obama traveled to Israel once. Will President Obama’s stance toward Israel continue in your administration?

2. What do you think of the BDS movement or any boycott of Israel for that matter?

3. What factors have contributed to the rise of anti-Semitism and attacks upon Jews globally?

4. Women are still abducted, abused, bought, sold, traded, raped, stoned, mutilated, and beheaded; especially by American “partners” in Arab and Muslim states. What specifically, besides rhetoric at the UN, have you or your predecessors at the State Department done to help abused women abroad?

5. Russia and Israel have been isolated and sanctioned in the Clinton/Obama era. Why are there no comparable sanctions for the host of Muslim nation states (Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are examples) that supply jihadists to kill Americans, Jews, and Christians in the name of God and Islam?

6. Do you think that Russian nationalism is a bigger problem than Islamic imperialism? Isn’t the former a local problem and the latter a global threat?

7. Do you think NATO expansion in Europe is a good idea?

8. Do you remember your now famous victory dance in Libya after the summary execution of Qaddafi? What responsibility are you willing to take for the Libyan collapse and subsequent Benghazi atrocity?

9. Gloating over Libya do you still consider ongoing events in North Africa and the Levant an “Arab Spring”?

10. The Obama administration is signing agreements instead of treaties with repressive Islamic theocracies, pariah states like Iran? Is an “agreement” more enforceable? How will this work in a Rodham Clinton White House?

11. If the nuclear “deal” with the ayatollahs is designed to insure or prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, can you explain the “insurance” provisions in detail?

12. Some have suggested that any agreement with Iran is a game of “kick the can.” As president, what is the Hillary Clinton game plan to deal with any Iranian recidivism?

13. How do you reconcile values like national “sovereignty” and US schemes to undermine regimes in Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Egypt, Syria, Libya, Ukraine, and elsewhere?

14. As president, will you formally recognize the Armenian genocide in Turkey?

15. You must be aware by now that American aircraft and weapons are being used by Turkey to kill Kurds in Iraq and Syria? How do you justify NATO attacks against our one reliable Muslim ally in the Levant?

16. As a cabinet officer, how does your personal convenience trump national security?

17. Couldn’t NSA or the Intelligence Community provide copies of your “personal” server emails to the FBI and Congress?

18. Will you make such a request, to DCI James Clapper, in order to put this matter behind you?

19. Have you received a donation to the Clinton Foundation from a country you recently visited?

20. How many Middle Eastern refugees is the United States supposed to absorb and why?

21. You were in charge of the Russian “reset!” How is it going?

22. What would you do about the Chinese cyber attacks, pirating of commercial property, and military buildup?

23. Would you order military action that does not involve the direct defense of the nation without consulting Congress?

24. Have you ever, while secretary of state, solicited contributions for your Clinton Foundation, or promoted or arranged speaking engagements for your husband from countries that receive foreign aid from the United States?

25. Do you see any similarities between the current Iran nuclear deal and your husband’s negotiations with the former non-nuclear North Korea?

Vetting Hillary 02

On Domestic Policy

1. Do you consider drug felonies non-violent crimes? If drugs destroy individual lives, imperil families, neighborhoods, and communities, how is any of this “non-violent?”

2. Do you favor amnesty and/or early release for so-called non-violent American drug lords?

3. Donald Trump has proposed to build a barrier on the Mexican border to control illegal immigration. What is your plan to control illegal immigration?

4. Mr. Trump also claims that Mexico is exporting criminals to the United States. American prisons now house nearly 400,000 felons who were born in Mexico, indeed, as much as a third of the American prison population. Is Mexico exporting crime and felons to America?

5. The world’s most notorious and homicidal drug lord, “El Chapo” Guzman, has had a least two anchor babies in Los Angeles. Do you think the wives or girlfriends of Mexican felons should have the same rights as legal visitors and legal immigrants?

6. Do you consider Guzman a “violent” drug offender?

7. American debt and deficits have reached record highs under Mr. Obama. If we can assume “growth,” as a solution, is off the table for the near term, what’s your plan?

8. Do you ever consider restraint or austerity as a solution to profligate spending?

9. Can you name two failed federal programs, or federal departments, that you would cashier in the name of reform or cost effectiveness?

10. The Obama administration has invested treasure and the First Lady’s prestige on pre-school, breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snack programs. The most expensive public school system in the world, especially in urban areas, is pretty much a consensus failure and more than half the food served in public schools now goes in the trash. What is your solution for such incompetence and waste?

11. The police seem to have become the enemy in the Obama era. What is the more important problem here, social pathology in minority communities or law enforcement in those troubled neighborhoods?

12. Can you tell me how many black men, women, and children were killed by other black men in 2014?

13. If not, could you tell us the 2015 homicide rate, and the race of perps and victims, in Washington, DC alone this year?

14. Isn’t the District of Columbia, after all, President Obama’s back yard?

15. Why isn’t the nation’s capital, of all American cities, an urban role model for the rest of America?

16. Do you think the District of Columbia should be a state?

17. Could a practicing Muslim be the president of the United States? Would you endorse a Muslim to be president?

18. Did you see the Planned Parenthood videos? Or parts of some? What would interrupt you not to see them?

19. What of a Muslim’s position on women’s rights and Sharia law?

20. Would there be a prayer rug in the Oval Office?

21. What is the difference between a Democrat, Socialist and Communist?

22. Have you ever done a political favor for Donald Trump?

23. What was Huma Abedin’s position at the State Department, and how many salaries did she collect?

Vetting Hillary 03

One last personal question:

We would like to end on a personal note, Mrs. Clinton, if you don’t mind. Have you or your husband ever considered yourselves role models for youngsters who might aspire to careers in politics or public service?

Thank you and good luck.

“If you do not tell the truth about yourself you cannot tell it about other people.” Virginia Woolf

Among the first to take “advantage” of the well-crafted plan for Hillary Clinton to be “spontaneous” was CNN, fresh off its staging of a GOP food fight designed to set Republican “rivals” at each others’ throats.

 

Perhaps in “gratitude” Hillary granted an “audience” with Wolf Blitzer. Unfortunately for Hillary, Wolf asked some pretty “decent” questions and Hillary said “You know I can’t answer that!”

NRO lists them:

1. Carly Fiorina said you lack accomplishments. What’s your biggest accomplishment as secretary of State?
2. Carly Fiorina dared you to watch the Planned Parenthood videos; have you seen them?
3. Might Planned Parenthood have broken any federal laws?
4. Regarding your server, why did it take you so long to apologize?
5. Why is Bernie Sanders beating you in Iowa and New Hampshire?
6. Are you more qualified than Vice President Biden?
7. Are you ready to accept more DNC debates?
8. Will you call on the DNC to authorize more debates?
9. Would you be a better president than your husband?

But Hillary gave “not one direct answer” to any of these. And of course, Wolf asked “no” follow-up questions to “pin” her down.

Watch for yourself:

http://www.mrctv.org/embed/139293

Hillary Clinton NO 2016

Meet Hillary Clinton’s Team from Hell
Hillary’s interview with Andrea Mitchell made her problems worse
Clinton paid State Department IT staffer out of her own pocket to maintain server
Hillary’s server wipe has done incalculable damage to US counter-intelligence
Hillary’s Favorability at All-Time Low
Could Hillary’s personality be improved with Ben Carson’s help?
Obama Justice Department Decides Not to Charge Clinton Aide Huma Abedin
FBI leaks that it has recovered deleted ‘private’ emails on Hillary’s server
State Department reveals Hillary lied about request to turn over private server emails
The Old Gray Mare

Vetting Hillary 04

The Old Gray Hair Ain’t What She Used To Be, butt she’s still two-faced.

Don’t Screw the Ayatollah

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on August 11, 2015 by andelino

<a

John Kerry warns Congress not to “screw Ayatollah Khamenei,” the same guy who still calls for “Death to America and Israel.”

There John Kerry goes again.

Jeffrey Goldberg, the go-to person when the Obama administration wants to get its “position” out because Goldberg is pro-Israel, landed an “interview” with John Kerry.

The top “storyline” is that Kerry is warning the U.S. Congress not to “screw” with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei:

“The ayatollah constantly believed that we are untrustworthy, that you can’t negotiate with us, that we will screw them,” Kerry said.

“This”—a congressional rejection—“will be the ultimate screwing. He went on to “argue” that the United States Congress will “prove” the ayatollah’s “suspicion,” and there’s no way he’s “ever” coming back.

Don't Screw the Ayatollah 03

“He will not come back to negotiate. Out of dignity, out of a suspicion that you can’t trust America. America is not going to negotiate in good faith. It didn’t negotiate in good faith now, would be his point.”

Seriously, we are afraid of “ruining” the expectations of an Ayatollah who “defends” calling for the death of “America and Israel:”

And who just “published” a book on how to “defeat” the U.S. and “destroy” Israel?

And who openly “threatens” Israel?

Don't Screw the Ayatollah 02

Would this be the same Ayatollah who tweeted out an image of Obama holding a “gun” to his own head?

Don't Screw the Ayatollah 06

Well, let’s be sure not to “offend” HIM.

Don’t “worry” about what the Iranians say, says Kerry, they don’t “really” mean it:

“Though he says he is in tune with this set of Israeli fears, he does not endorse a view widely shared by Israelis—and by many Americans—that Iran’s leaders, who have often said that they seek the destruction of Israel, mean what they say. I think they have a fundamental ideological confrontation with Israel at this particular moment. Whether or not that translates into active steps to, quote, ‘Wipe it,’ you know …” Here I interjected: “Wipe it off the map.”

Kerry continued: “I don’t know the answer to that. I haven’t seen anything that says to me—they’ve got 80,000 rockets in Hezbollah pointed at Israel, and any number of choices could have been made. They didn’t make the bomb when they had enough material for 10 to 12. They’ve signed on to an agreement where they say they’ll never try and make one and we have a mechanism in place where we can prove that. So I don’t want to get locked into that debate. I think it’s a waste of time here.”

That comment reminds me of the “laughable” interview by anti-Israel U. Michigan Professor Juan Cole, a “darling” of the anti-Israel left, who says that when Iranians chant “Death to America they mean I’d really like to visit Disneyland.”

Don't Screw the Ayatollah 04

But it’s “worse,” Kerry is relying on the “promises” of the Iranian Foreign Minister that Iran will now “work” with us on “regional” issues.

“Kerry also said that his chief Iranian interlocutor, the foreign minister, Javad Zarif, and Zarif’s boss, the (relatively) reformist president, Hassan Rouhani, would be in “serious trouble” at home if the deal falls through. Zarif, Kerry told me, explicitly promised him that Iran will engage with the United States and its Arab allies on a range of regional issues, should Congress approve the deal. “Zarif specifically said to me in the last two weeks, ‘If we get this finished, I am now empowered to work with and talk to you about regional issues.’” Kerry went on, “This is in Congress’s hands. If Congress says no, Congress will shut that down, shut off that conversation, set this back, and set in motion a series of inevitables about what would happen with respect to Iranian behavior, and, by the way, the sanctions will be over.”

We are now the “weak” horse, being “trained” by our masters.

John Kerry is “dangerously” naive.

His boss isn’t “naive,” this is all part of the “Grand Bargain” strategy with Iran Obama has been “pursuing” since he took office, something we highlighted back in June 2009, when Obama abandoned the uprising against the Mullah regime:

“During the campaign and after assuming the presidency, Barack Obama repeatedly stated his willingness to engage in negotiations with Iran without any preconditions. But that was and is not true.

The events of the past two weeks, including the revelation that Obama sent a letter in May to “Supreme Leader” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, reveal that there is one precondition to negotiations which Obama willingly embraces: United States acceptance of Mullah rule in Iran in perpetuity.

Acceptance of Mullah rule, notwithstanding what the people of Iran may want or basic human rights, is the key to the Grand Bargain the Obama administration seeks to strike with Iran. In fact, U.S. help to perpetuate the “Mullahtocracy” appears to be the ONLY precondition.”

Someone is “going” to get screwed here, and it’s “not” the Ayatollah.

Son of Kenya 10

At the American University in Washington, D.C., “Mullah” Obama spoke about the Iran “nuclear” deal and declared hardliners chanting “death to America” as the ones opposed to that deal and said they were “making common cause” with Republicans.

“I recognize that resorting to force may be tempting in the face of the rhetoric and behavior that emanates from parts of Iran. It is offensive. It is incendiary. We do take it seriously. But superpowers should not act impulsively in response to taunts, or even provocations that can be addressed short of war. Just because Iranian hard-liners chant ‘death to America’ does not mean that that’s what all Iranians believe. In fact, it’s those hard-liners who are most comfortable with the status quo. It’s those hard-liners chanting ‘death to America’ who have been most opposed to the deal. They’re making common cause with the Republican caucus.”

“Shut out the noise. Consider the stakes involved with the vote you will cast. If Congress kills this deal, we will lose more than just constraints on Iran’s nuclear deal or what we have painstakingly built. We will have lost something more precious—America’s credibility as a leader of diplomacy. America’s credibility is the anchor of the international system. John F. Kennedy cautioned here, more than 50 years ago at this university, that the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic as the pursuit of war. But it’s so very important. It is surely the pursuit of peace that is most needed in this world so full of strife. My fellow Americans, contact your representatives in Congress, remind them of who we are. Remind them of what is best in us and what we stand for. So that we can leave behind a world that is more secure and peaceful for our children. Thank you very much.”

195064_5_

Mullah Obama’s catastrophic “tenure” at 1600 Pennsylvania, like Hillary Clinton’s “catastrophic” tenure at Foggy Bottom, the Russian “reset,” the trial run for the “Muslim Brotherhood” in Egypt, the launching of the “Libyan” chaos, the hasty “withdrawal” from Iraq and the subsequent “vacuum” into which the Islamic State “moved,” will be remembered “hardly” at all once Iran gets the “bomb” as now guaranteed.

That is the bottom line of the Iran “deal.” Iran is now a legitimized “soon-to-be” nuclear state. Children born today won’t have started “world history” in 9th grade before Iran has “nukes.”

Iran’s Victory Lap
Netanyahu: Iran Nuclear Deal Will Ensure ‘Horrific’ War In Middle East
My Prediction on the Hostages in Iran
Kerry’s cozy link to Islamists
A nuclear Iran is now guaranteed
In the US, joking about war has become acceptable
Obama Surrenders the American Flag to Our Enemies
Iranian Court Fines the U.S. $50 Billion!
President Obama insults Iranians

Green Cards

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on June 19, 2015 by andelino

Green Cards 05

When you want to fundamentally “transform” America, and make it quietly gradual, green cards can help.

Granted, “Common Core” public education is a great tool helping us, the people, to “UN-learn” the Constitution, but foreigners, “legal or illegal,” are even better because they already “don’t know” the Constitution.

Green Cards 00

Not knowing their “rights” as citizens makes foreign workers and peasants a lot more “tractable.” Some of them don’t “speak” English and most can’t “read” cursive, which is what the “Constitution” was originally written in.

It is a simple way to transition from constitution to communism. We need results much “quicker” and the foreign “immigrants” will get us there.

The “individualistic” American culture is “foreign” to foreigners and with the way things stand now, they won’t be “allowed” to learn it.

Green Cards 12

Obama willing, ten years later we’ll all be “speaking” a foreign language and all our new American “workers and peasants” will ever know about the Constitution is that it’s some “obscure” document written in “forgotten “cursive.

Progress is moving rapidly and “Next Tuesday” is ever so close.

Judging by the 10-gallon hat, this man must be a “Texan,” and he’s reading the new “constitution” of his republic. So what seems to be the problem?

Green Cards 09

One part of my “foreign policy” plan, Obama explained, is to conduct a forward thinking “proactive” policy of sending our Armed Forces south and east into the “oppressed” countries from which many millions of economic “refugees” are escaping to the United States.

As wise “Democrats” know, millions and millions of the poor in those countries “yearn” for and “dream” of living in the United States where they can “enjoy” their lives in “peace” and productivity.

Obviously we “must” help these people. Obama’s plan will “turn” Central and South American countries into “new” States of our great Nation thus “humanely” liberating those people and giving them new “hope,” small “change” and “freedom.”

Green Cards 02

We will use the U.S. military in a “humanitarian” effort, and once the “integration” is accomplished, will give the Democratic party many new “loyal” voters.

All we need is “compassion” in our hearts.

Green Cards 08

And let’s not forget the “Violence Against Women Act” (VAWA) signed by Bill Clinton, a “true lover of women,” that allows any woman, especially those from other countries, to “accuse” the man they hook up with “abuse.”

After the “hookup,” all they have to do is to get the guy to “marry” her. Having achieved that step, the next one is to “file” for divorce.

They don’t even have to “provide” proof. It’s assumed they “experienced” this abuse because women are “reluctant” to mention the details of the “transgressions” because of “shame”, therefore should be granted to “dissolve” the bonds of matrimony and “marry” a new victim.

Green Cards 04

Voila! Instant “Green Card!” And, in many cases, “US citizenship.”

I despise these so called “privileged” green cards as exclusive and “racist,” as they marginalize the “chlorophyll” challenged!

They come here and “displace” the underprivileged and unfortunate citizens just because they “will do what American workers won’t do.”

Green Cards 10

President Obama, our “fearless” leader, has “promised” Immigrants, “When you have a job, you can keep it. Period.”

Democrats have “battled” Republicans for months and now they can begin “issuing” millions of work “authorization” permits.

Green Cards 06

The Obama administration is almost “finished” with the process of “amnesty” by circumventing congress.

The next process is a “rubber stamp for citizenship.”

Green Cards 11

Obama Administration’s Rubber-Stamping of Citizenship
Officers are Pressured to Rubber Stamp Applications’ of Illegal Aliens
Don’t Let Obama’s ‘Massive Unilateral Amnesty’ Go Through
Dwindling Years As President ‘Concentrates The Mind’
Who Voted to Bring 33 Million Immigrants North?

 

Foreign Policy

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , on August 30, 2013 by andelino

What our Egypt friends think about Obama

A music video featuring an Arabic-singing belly dancer voicing profanity-laced lyrics that accuse President Barack Obama of supporting terrorism and the Muslim Brotherhood has gone viral in Egypt.
Lyrics:
Ole Ole
AlSissi has dismissed Morsi
Ole Ole
AlSissi has dismissed Morsi
Hey …. you Sayed
Morsi won’t see the feast
Hey… you Sayed
Morsi won’t see the feast

You Obama, your father, mother
And all the others
Listen to me Obama
Our army is very strong
You Obama, your father, mother
And all the others
Behave yourself
Our army is very strong

Hey Obama … Hey Obama
Hey Obama, supports the terrorism
Traitor like the Brotherhood members
Obama says it’s a coup
That’s not your business dirty man
Obama says it’s a coup
That’s not your “father, mother” business

And you, Patterson, stop messing
Old bitch woman.

Hey Obama, your father, mother,
You want us to release Morsi
Hey Obama you are stupid bad man
You want us to release Morsi
Stop this or I will stab you.
Why then you told Mubarak
To leave immediately?
Hey!
Hey Obama, your father, mother
You threaten us with the US Aid
Fuck it and fuck you
You are a jerk
Obama
You threaten us with the US Aid
Your ambassador is very wicked woman
AlSissi has beaten you
And Egyptian people supported him.

Hey Obama, your father, mother
You meet AlNoor Islamic Party
HA HA HA!
Now we know all the secrets.
Egyptians are not idiots
You meet AlNoor Islamic Party
This party is sneaky and menless (sic)
Al Noor, Brotherhood and Aboul Fotooh are the same.

Hey Obama, your father, mother
Hey Obama
Be polite.
Hey Obama, your father, mother
You and terrorists,
Listen to me Obama
Our army is very strong.
Hey Obama, your father, mother
And all the disgusting guys,
We are the people tell you
You can’t fool us.
You tried to play it
But you can’t play this wicked game
With us “cause we are the Alfa  

What our Russian friends think about Obama

Arab Spring Surprise

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on December 20, 2012 by andelino

The Battle for the Arab SpringIn recent months, Obama’s “foreign” policies are not going so well.

In “Libya,” Obama pushed out brutal but cooperative dictator Moammar Gadhafi. The country turned lawless.

On 9/11, terrorists not reacting to an obscure anti-Islam video sacked the “Benghazi” consulate, killing four Americans.

“Al Qaeda” forces are resurgent there, making a lie of Obama’s campaign claims the outfit had been devastated by George W. Bush’s successor.

In “Egypt,” Obama helped oust brutal but cooperative dictator Hosni Mubarak.

Which lead to a national election win by Mohammed Morsi, a Muslim Brotherhood “brother,” who’s now denouncing Israel, visiting Iran, supporting “Sharia law” and claiming the familiar “temporary” dictatorial powers, despite widespread pro-democracy street demonstrations.

Despite effusive praise for Morsi from Obama spokesman Jay Carney, the new Egyptian leader doesn’t seem worried about Obama cutting off his billions in U.S. aid.

And public opinion polls there indicate a substantial majority of Egyptians no longer like the United States.

Then, there’s “Hamas'” rockets and “Israeli” retaliation and “Iran’s” nukes and “Syrian” slaughter and “Serin.”

Obama has been phoning “Mideastern” Muslim leaders in recent weeks more often than he’s called “House” Republicans.

White House “read-outs” of presidential phone communications typically describe in general terms the subjects discussed, always emphasizing agreements between the two chatting leaders and promises of important future consultations and collaborations.

Here is the full read-out of Obama’s phone call to Morsi. See if you too are struck by this “one-sided” conversation. There’s not one single word about Morsi’s response or reaction to the Obama’s lecture.

“President Obama called President Morsi today to express his deep concern about the deaths and injuries of protesters in Egypt.  The President emphasized that all political leaders in Egypt should make clear to their supporters that violence is unacceptable.  He welcomed President Morsi’s call for a dialogue with the opposition but stressed that such a dialogue should occur without preconditions.  The President noted that the United States has also urged opposition leaders to join in this dialogue without preconditions.  He reiterated the United States’ continued support for the Egyptian people and their transition to a democracy that respects the rights of all Egyptians. The President underscored that it is essential for Egyptian leaders across the political spectrum to put aside their differences and come together to agree on a path that will move Egypt forward.” 

This could mean President Morsi laughed at the Chicago “Community Organizer” offering advice on governing to the leader of a 4,600-year-old country. Perhaps Morsi said nothing or sent Obama’s call straight through to voice mail as Obama chattered away.

Morsi Obama

Or it could also possibly mean that the White House chose not to release the “original” transcript of the “one sided” talk with Morsi:

Hello? Is this President Morsi’s office? . . . It is? Could you please put me through to him? . . . Yes, I’ll wait. Thank you. . . . Dum de dum dum. . . . Yes, is this President Morsi? . . . Hello, Mohamed! This is Barack. . . . Barack Hussein Obama, you know, your brother from another mother. I’m calling from here in the United States. . . Yes, Mohamed, Allahu Akbar to you, too. . . . How am I? Well, I’m fine. Thanks for asking. And how about yourself? . . .  You’re fine, too. Good. I’m glad that we’re both fine. . . . Now listen, Mohamed, about these embassy things. I just called to apologize to you VERY DEEPLY about what a bunch of infidels we have here in this country. . . . I know, I know, may they all be spat upon by camels and have their testicles crushed. . . . It’s just, you see, we have this silly little ‘freedom of speech’ thing here in America, and, frankly, there’s not much I can do about it at the moment. We’re TRYING–believe me, we’re trying–to do everything we can to stop them, but some of our folks are kind of, well, obstinate. . . . Yes, I know, Mohamed, it would be so much simpler if we just gunned them all down, but this is an election year, and that sort of thing would not go over too well. . . . So, what I guess I’m saying is: What do you want me to do to appease your crowds? . . . An apology tour through the Arab world? I could do that. Could it wait till after the election, though? I’ve got a lot of fundraisers to attend right now. . . . And, and what? Five billion dollars more in aid? We could do that. . . . Made out to your personal account? OK, let me talk to my people and I’ll get back to you. . . . Fine. Alright then. And may a thousand virgins greet you in paradise, too, Mohamed. Bye now.”

The “Appeaser-and-Apologizer-in-Chief” looks more and more bewildered and befuddled as the “Arab Spring” surprise is blowing up in “Emperor Obozo’s” face while Libya, Cairo, Benghazi, Hamas, Israel, Syria and Iran “burn brightly.”

Arab Spring Surprise

Seriously, what an “idiotic” U.S. administration “failure” we have in the White House fiddling, bumbling and fumbling around in Foreign Policy affairs.

Egypt and the Death of the “Arab Spring”

Americans Are Cows, Not Cowboys; “America Will Disintegrate”

Quran 3151

%d bloggers like this: