Archive for european union

Settled Climate Science

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on May 15, 2017 by andelino

Liberal Democrat, “climate alarmist” and daughter of President Trump, “Ivanka”, has been tapped by her father to head a review of the United States commitment to the UN Paris 2015 climate agreement.

That document is an UN-ratified “faux-treaty” that is 31 sheets of “dictatorial” fish-wrap unilaterally “imposed” upon America by Barack Hussein Obama and John Kerry, with some timely help from “co-conspirator” Pope Francis and others.

Obama “committed” America in 2015 to the national “suicide” of cutting our economic activity while transferring our “wealth and technology” to what they term “developing nations” in a mad dash to global “equity and uniformity.”

The most important “goal,” though unstated for obvious reasons, is the “elimination” of the US from its perch atop the world “economic” hierarchy, a pretext for a “global” government under UN “fascist” control.

Obama signed us up to “cut” our economic activity by at least 26 percent “below” our 2005 levels, which was already an industrially “depressed” period, by 2025. That’s just eight “short” years from now, the “duration” of the Trump administration if he is a “two-term” president.

Without the US involved as the “willing” victim there is no Paris summit. It is dead. The only reason other nations are signed up for this “nonsense” is so that they can get a position at the “trough” feeding upon the pieces of America’s “carcass” or to help guarantee our “demise.”

Every other nation is “acting” in their own self interest, either “declining” the hemlock, as is the case with China, Russia and India, who chose not to “self-destruct,” or by being on the expected receiving end of “money, capacity and technology” stolen from the American people by the supreme “grifter and commie conman,” Hussein Obama.

Of the “31 pages” of the document there are only “four or five” sentences that even deal with “global temperatures” and were likely “inserted” for the sake of maintaining appearances. There is nothing technical. It is nothing more than “property acquisition, wealth and technology redistribution, social engineering and international welfare agreement.”

The “globalists” of the United Nations will be holding a “climate change” or “America pillaging” meeting in Bonn, Germany.

President Trump’s “advisers,” of which liberal “wonder girl” Ivanka is one, will be meeting in Washington to “finalize” the United States’ official “position” of whether or not to “honor” the bogus, “death to America” document.

Bloomberg reported last month that, “Both the president’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, and her husband, Jared Kushner, a White House special adviser, have urged the president to stay in the deal, along with Tillerson.”

An unnamed State Department official told the AP, “The decision to participate in next week’s U.N. climate talks shouldn’t be construed as a sign that Trump has decided to stay in the Paris pact.”

“To the contrary, the U.S. will be sending a ‘much smaller’ delegation than it has in years past.” That statement is encouraging.

How is it that the US can “contribute” the lion’s share to their “slush” fund of $100 billion per year by 2020, but we “can’t” find $14 billion for a “border” wall?

We can help fund our own “destruction” but have no money for “defending” our sovereignty?

The entire “document” is an obvious “fraud” but consider the following “excerpts” of many as emblematic:

“Acknowledging that climate change is common concern of humankind, Parties should, when taking action to address climate change, respect, promote and consider their respective obligations on human rights, the right to health, the rights of indigenous peoples, local communities, migrants, children, persons with disabilities and people in vulnerable situations and the right to development, as well as gender equality, empowerment of women and inter-generational equity.

Also recognizing that sustainable lifestyles [UN Agenda 2030] and sustainable patterns of consumption and production, with developed country Parties taking the lead, [providing the money] play an important role in addressing climate change.”

Those aren’t the “words” of addressing a supposed  “climate emergency” but of global social engineering on our dime of “wresting global control of the world for the UN and their Agenda 2030 authoritarian power grab.”

The “money” for all of this has to come from “somewhere” and that somewhere is “us.”

It’s no “exaggeration” to say that America is being “tied up and gang raped” by the UN predators through this “agreement.”

Americans are opposed to “rape,” particularly under a “blue” UN helmet.

We’re saying “no,” Ivanka, and “no means no.”

Let what was settled now be resettled. Scores of American settled scientists and other Al Gore-aligned “prog-activists” may soon join the “bureaucratic” conga lines, “renounce” their US citizenship, and “pledge” their fortunes and sacred “honor” to the European Union after the newly elected President of France Emmanuel Macron “pleaded” with them to leave their Trump “infected” motherland in a passionately tweeted video.

“Please come to France. You are welcome, it’s your nation,” Macron said in a short video message to US researchers, entrepreneurs and engineers. “I do know your new president has decided to jeopardize your budget, your initiatives as he is extremely skeptical about climate change. I have no doubt about climate change and how committed we have to be regarding this issue.”

Indeed, France is quickly turning into the “Climate Change Mecca,” which is why millions of “immigrants” from all over the world, including many “Islamic” climate researchers, are “flocking” to this fairy-tale land of “lactose-free milk, sugar-free honey, coal-free power plants, and green-colored, environmentally friendly suicide vests.”

We would answer Macron’s call to “resettle,” but someone needs to stay “behind” and keep the science “settled” here. It’s a “dirty” job but somebody has to do it. That and the “fact” that French “shovels” have a different, “metric” standard.

Nevertheless, we “fully” support the call for all the “settled scientists to resettle” to France and become the first “officially” registered wave of “climate-change-induced migrations” that Barack Obama has “famously” predicted in his “prophetic” speech.

I envision a remake of “Casablanca: Part Deux” featuring the remains of the new “lost” generation of American climate change “expatriates” in Europe, congregating in one of the last “refuges” from the climate-change-induced “devastation” in north Africa, which has become completely “peaceful” after all its Muslims had “migrated” to Europe.

The famous “lines” will have to be only slightly altered: “Play it again, Barack!” and “We will always have the Paris Agreement.”

And the theme “song” that Barack will play, “As time goes by,” will read…

And when two climatologists meet
They still say, “We have ten years left to save the planet.”
On that you can rely
No matter what the future brings
As time goes by.

Emmanuel Macron also promptly “proposed” a new French initiative called the “Fair Redistribution of Terror in Europe” program.

“It is unfair that France and other enlightened and generous nations, who open their borders and welcome Muslim refugees, must suffer the most from Islamic terrorism,” Macron said after the election.

“Being a fair-minded person, I am both saddened and outraged that less enlightened nations, especially Eastern European countries like Polen and Hungary, who close their borders to Muslim migrants, get to enjoy terror-free existence. It just doesn’t make sense.”

Macron promised to use all his “power and influence” to ensure that “Islamic” terrorism in Europe is “distributed” more equitably.

“This means Poland and Hungary will be forced to absorb more of the terror attacks on European soil because that is what enlightened nations do,” he said.

Asked how his “powers” as President would help to turn his “ideas” into reality, the suave, devastatingly “handsome” Macron reminded everyone that France is not “America” whose government must abide by “outdated” constitutional limitations.

“Americans may brag about their freedom, but it is, in fact, our government that has a lot more freedom to do what’s necessary in any given political situation. In this sense, France is part of a broader community of progressive nations, the European Union, where we believe that every member must shoulder certain burdens in proportion to their geographic sizes and populations.”

“Being that Poland and Hungary are nations of considerable size, I will work with the EU to ensure that they endure terrorist attacks and cultural subversion in exact proportion to their territory – not more and not less – which is only fair.”

“And that begins by opening their borders and allowing in a proportionate quota of refugees from known cauldrons of Islamic terrorism. I can put their minds at ease with my personal guarantee that these quotas will be carefully calculated by highly qualified professionals in Brussels.”

Settled science? Let’s settle the argument
Scientists Found A ‘Totally Unexpected’ Source Of Climate Cooling
Obama Climate Change Speech Earns $3.26M
Ex-military flag officers back Mattis to fight climate change

Brexit Article 50 Letter

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on March 31, 2017 by andelino

Theresa May has officially delivered “Brexit Article 50 Letter” informing the “European Council” of Britain’s intention to “leave” the European Union.

On 23 June last year, the people of the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union.  As I have said before, that decision was no rejection of the values we share as fellow Europeans.  Nor was it an attempt to do harm to the European Union or any of the remaining member states.  On the contrary, the United Kingdom wants the European Union to succeed and prosper.  Instead, the referendum was a vote to restore, as we see it, our national self-determination. We are leaving the European Union, but we are not leaving Europe – and we want to remain committed partners and allies to our friends across the continent.

Earlier this month, the United Kingdom Parliament confirmed the result of the referendum by voting with clear and convincing majorities in both of its Houses for the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill.  The Bill was passed by Parliament on 13 March and it received Royal Assent from Her Majesty The Queen and became an Act of Parliament on 16 March.

Today, therefore, I am writing to give effect to the democratic decision of the people of the United Kingdom. I hereby notify the European Council in accordance with Article 50(2) of the Treaty on European Union of the United Kingdom’s intention to withdraw from the European Union.  In addition, in accordance with the same Article 50(2) as applied by Article 106a of the Treaty Establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, I hereby notify the European Council of the United Kingdom’s intention to withdraw from the European Atomic Energy Community. References in this letter to the European Union should therefore be taken to include a reference to the European Atomic Energy Community.

This letter sets out the approach of Her Majesty’s Government to the discussions we will have about the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union and about the deep and special partnership we hope to enjoy – as your closest friend and neighbor – with the European Union once we leave.  We believe that these objectives are in the interests not only of the United Kingdom but of the European Union and the wider world too.  

It is in the best interests of both the United Kingdom and the European Union that we should use the forthcoming process to deliver these objectives in a fair and orderly manner, and with as little disruption as possible on each side. We want to make sure that Europe remains strong and prosperous and is capable of projecting its values, leading in the world, and defending itself from security threats. We want the United Kingdom, through a new deep and special partnership with a strong European Union, to play its full part in achieving these goals. We therefore believe it is necessary to agree the terms of our future partnership alongside those of our withdrawal from the European Union.

The Government wants to approach our discussions with ambition, giving citizens and businesses in the United Kingdom and the European Union – and indeed from third countries around the world – as much certainty as possible, as early as possible.

I would like to propose some principles that may help to shape our coming discussions, but before I do so, I should update you on the process we will be undertaking at home, in the United Kingdom.

The process in the United Kingdom

As I have announced already, the Government will bring forward legislation that will repeal the Act of Parliament – the European Communities Act 1972 – that gives effect to EU law in our country.  This legislation will, wherever practical and appropriate, in effect convert the body of existing European Union law (the “acquis”) into UK law.  This means there will be certainty for UK citizens and for anybody from the European Union who does business in the United Kingdom.

The Government will consult on how we design and implement this legislation, and we will publish a White Paper tomorrow. We also intend to bring forward several other pieces of legislation that address specific issues relating to our departure from the European Union, also with a view to ensuring continuity and certainty, in particular for businesses.

We will of course continue to fulfill our responsibilities as a member state while we remain a member of the European Union, and the legislation we propose will not come into effect until we leave.

From the start and throughout the discussions, we will negotiate as one United Kingdom, taking due account of the specific interests of every nation and region of the UK as we do so.  When it comes to the return of powers back to the United Kingdom, we will consult fully on which powers should reside in Westminster and which should be devolved to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.  But it is the expectation of the Government that the outcome of this process will be a significant increase in the decision-making power of each devolved administration.

Negotiations between the United Kingdom and the European Union

The United Kingdom wants to agree with the European Union a deep and special partnership that takes in both economic and security cooperation.

To achieve this, we believe it is necessary to agree the terms of our future partnership alongside those of our withdrawal from the EU.

If, however, we leave the European Union without an agreement the default position is that we would have to trade on World Trade Organization terms. In security terms a failure to reach agreement would mean our cooperation in the fight against crime and terrorism would be weakened.

In this kind of scenario, both the United Kingdom and the European Union would of course cope with the change, but it is not the outcome that either side should seek. We must therefore work hard to avoid that outcome.

It is for these reasons that we want to be able to agree a deep and special partnership, taking in both economic and security cooperation, but it is also because we want to play our part in making sure that Europe remains strong and prosperous and able to lead in the world, projecting its values and defending itself from security threats.  And we want the United Kingdom to play its full part in realizing that vision for our continent.

Proposed principles for our discussions

Looking ahead to the discussions which we will soon begin, I would like to suggest some principles that we might agree to help make sure that the process is as smooth and successful as possible.

  1. We should engage with one another constructively and respectfully, in a spirit of sincere cooperation.  Since I became Prime Minister of the United Kingdom I have listened carefully to you, to my fellow EU Heads of Government and the Presidents of the European Commission and Parliament.  That is why the United Kingdom does not seek membership of the single market: we understand and respect your position that the four freedoms of the single market are indivisible and there can be no “cherry picking”.  We also understand that there will be consequences for the UK of leaving the EU: we know that we will lose influence over the rules that affect the European economy.  We also know that UK companies will, as they trade within the EU, have to align with rules  agreed by institutions of which we are no longer a part  – just as UK companies do in other overseas markets.
  1. We should always put our citizens first.  There is obvious complexity in the discussions we are about to undertake, but we should remember that at the heart of our talks are the interests of all our citizens.  There are, for example, many citizens of the remaining member states living in the United Kingdom, and UK citizens living elsewhere in the European Union, and we should aim to strike an early agreement about their rights.
  1. We should work towards securing a comprehensive agreement.  We want to agree a deep and special partnership between the UK and the EU, taking in both economic and security cooperation. We will need to discuss how we determine a fair settlement of the UK’s rights and obligations as a departing member state, in accordance with the law and in the spirit of the United Kingdom’s continuing partnership with the EU.  But we believe it is necessary to agree the terms of our future partnership alongside those of our withdrawal from the EU.
  1. We should work together to minimize disruption and give as much certainty as possible.  Investors, businesses and citizens in both the UK and across the remaining 27 member states – and those from third countries around the world – want to be able to plan.  In order to avoid any cliff-edge as we move from our current relationship to our future partnership, people and businesses in both the UK and the EU would benefit from implementation periods to adjust in a smooth and orderly way to new arrangements.  It would help both sides to minimize unnecessary disruption if we agree this principle early in the process.
  1. In particular, we must pay attention to the UK’s unique relationship with the Republic of Ireland and the importance of the peace process in Northern Ireland.  The Republic of Ireland is the only EU member state with a land border with the United Kingdom.  We want to avoid a return to a hard border between our two countries, to be able to maintain the Common Travel Area between us, and to make sure that the UK’s withdrawal from the EU does not harm the Republic of Ireland.  We also have an important responsibility to make sure that nothing is done to jeopardize the peace process in Northern Ireland, and to continue to uphold the Belfast Agreement.
  1. We should begin technical talks on detailed policy areas as soon as possible, but we should prioritize the biggest challenges. Agreeing a high-level approach to the issues arising from our withdrawal will of course be an early priority.  But we also propose a bold and ambitious Free Trade Agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union. This should be of greater scope and ambition than any such agreement before it so that it covers sectors crucial to our linked economies such as financial services and network industries.  This will require detailed technical talks, but as the UK is an existing EU member state, both sides have regulatory frameworks and standards that already match.  We should therefore prioritize how we manage the evolution of our regulatory frameworks to maintain a fair and open trading environment, and how we resolve disputes.  On the scope of the partnership between us – on both economic and security matters – my officials will put forward detailed proposals for deep, broad and dynamic cooperation.
  1. We should continue to work together to advance and protect our shared European values.  Perhaps now more than ever, the world needs the liberal, democratic values of Europe.  We want to play our part to ensure that Europe remains strong and prosperous and able to lead in the world, projecting its values and defending itself from security threats.

The task before us

As I have said, the Government of the United Kingdom wants to agree a deep and special partnership between the UK and the EU, taking in both economic and security cooperation.  At a time when the growth of global trade is slowing and there are signs that protectionist instincts are on the rise in many parts of the world, Europe has a responsibility to stand up for free trade in the interest of all our citizens.

Likewise, Europe’s security is more fragile today than at any time since the end of the Cold War. Weakening our cooperation for the prosperity and protection of our citizens would be a costly mistake. The United Kingdom’s objectives for our future partnership remain those set out in my Lancaster House speech of 17 January and the subsequent White Paper published on 2 February. 

We recognize that it will be a challenge to reach such a comprehensive agreement within the two-year period set out for withdrawal discussions in the Treaty. But we believe it is necessary to agree the terms of our future partnership alongside those of our withdrawal from the EU.

We start from a unique position in these discussions – close regulatory alignment, trust in one another’s institutions, and a spirit of cooperation stretching back decades.  It is for these reasons, and because the future partnership between the UK and the EU is of such importance to both sides, that I am sure it can be agreed in the time period set out by the Treaty.

The task before us is momentous but it should not be beyond us.  After all, the institutions and the leaders of the European Union have succeeded in bringing together a continent blighted by war into a union of peaceful nations, and supported the transition of dictatorships to democracy.

Together, I know we are capable of reaching an agreement about the UK’s rights and obligations as a departing member state, while establishing a deep and special partnership that contributes towards the prosperity, security and global power of our continent.

Now all is “needed” for the other 27 members to “leave” the European Union and get “rid of globalization.”

Greece Declares Victory

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on July 5, 2015 by andelino

Head of radical leftist Syriza party Tsipras speaks after winning elections in Athens.

Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras took a victory lap this morning, immediately after his Finance Minister Yanis Vardoulakis formally announced the country was “leaving” the Euro Zone and the European Union, and also “defaulting” on all its obligations to the “IMF, the ECB, the World Bank and the press conference’s caterers.”

“The proud hard-working men and women of our noble land,” he proudly proclaimed, “which invented democracy and yoghurt, will not surrender to the capitalist merchants of poverty and creditworthiness. We have triumphed over the Teutonic Brünhildas who tried to humiliate us, to crush our spirit and reduce us to slavery, just as we triumphed at the battle of Thermopylae.”

Greece Declares Victory 02

We declare victory and Greece will “survive forever!”

Prime Minister Tsipras noted that the massive “exodus” of third-world migrants from Greek cities to the countries left behind in the EU has “accelerated.”

“Every single day, thousands of barbarians are packing up their fake Luis Vuitton handbags and heading north to try to sell them in the lands of cold winters and cold people.

Our welfare budget has been reduced by 90% and we have made thousands of park benches available so that our own Greek youth can move out of their parents’ homes and start their productive lives as dedicated civil servants before they retire on fat pensions next year. Greece has triumphed again!”

Tsipras denied “rumors” that everyone under the age of sixty is leaving Greece as well. “Turkish propaganda,” he said, shutting his suitcase.

Greece Declares Victory 03

“Arrivederci,” he added as he walked out the door.

Greek banks closed for 6 days as default looms Tuesday
Greek ‘contagion’ and threats to the EU
If you like the Greek debt crisis, you’ll love the Puerto Rico meltdown
The scariest aspect of the current financial crisis
Euro Zone Expecting Greek Default After Bailout Extension Rejected
Greece Reels in Shock as Banks Shut