Archive for donald trump

Deep State Rising

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on September 8, 2021 by andelino

Since Donald Trump was elected president of the United States, a large amount of classified information has leaked from the government to the press. The majority of this information from anonymous and barely anonymous sources has been designed to discredit, damage and end his presidency.

Meanwhile, intelligence agencies have withheld intelligence reports from the president, and former spy chiefs have denounced the president as inexperienced, unstable and unethical. Federal agents have raided the office of the president’s personal attorney. Bureaucrats have found ways to obstruct, slow down, openly challenge or simply ignore the president’s instructions. When President Trump has publicly criticized and fired officials for such behavior, news commentators have accused him of dismantling a pillar of American government.

The vague complexities and “plausible deniability’s” inside the labyrinth of the federal government are confusing enough. But these scandals, investigations, accusations and lies within the government are absolutely bewildering to many. But it all comes down to one definite, disturbing fact: “The federal government is at war with itself.”

Deep State Timeline. Bureaucrats in Washington are waging a civil war against the Trump administration. He said he wanted to “drain the swamp,” but the swamp is fighting back. Many commentators are saying that something called the “deep state” is trying to exert its control over the United States government to the point of forcing President Trump from office.

Republican strategist Roger Stone said that if globalists within the government succeed in ousting President Trump, a “spasm of violence” could erupt. Some describe the nation as hurtling toward rioting and urban warfare. Such warnings sound extreme. But to know how seriously you should take the deep-state threat, you have to understand what it is and why it is fighting President Trump.

Deep State Rising. The term “deep state” originated in the 1970s in Turkey to describe a powerful, unelected government of bureaucrats, spies and military officers who colluded with drug cartels to put down a Kurdish insurgency.

The Oxford English Dictionary defines “deep state” as “a body of people, typically influential members of government agencies or the military, believed to be involved in the secret manipulation or control of government policy.” In the United States, the term typically describes the permanent bureaucracy of “unelected officials who govern the country with increasing autonomy and decreasing transparency.”

Fears that such a group of unelected officials could secretly be directing government policy date back to 1947, when President Harry Truman signed the National Security Act. This act created the Department of Defense, the National Security Council, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Central Intelligence Agency. During the Cold War, officials like CIA director Allen Dulles and Federal Bureau of Investigation director J. Edgar Hoover recruited at least a thousand former Nazi agents to work as American spies and informants.

This was done behind the backs of the American people, and President Truman came to deeply regret his role in establishing these agencies. “I never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into peacetime cloak-and-dagger operations,” he wrote in the Washington Post on Dec. 22, 1963. “Some of the complications and embarrassment I think we have experienced are in part attributable to the fact that this quiet intelligence arm of the president has been so removed from its intended role that it is being interpreted as a symbol of sinister and mysterious foreign intrigue—and a subject for Cold War enemy propaganda.”

Instead of making the CIA more accountable to the American people, however, government officials allowed the intelligence community to continue operating with negligible oversight and considerable independence, to the point of assassinating foreign leaders and illegally monitoring the communications of U.S. citizens, up to and including the president of the United States.

In 1971, a Navy stenographer admitted to rifling through burn bags, interoffice envelopes and briefcases for communications between President Richard Nixon and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and also passing on top-secret documents to the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon. The espionage became known as the Moorer-Radford affair. The Joint Chiefs of Staff was illegally spying on its commander in chief.

When Sen. Frank Church led an investigation into CIA, FBI and National Security Agency activities in the 1970s, he warned that technological advancements were giving these agencies unprecedented surveillance powers.

“If this government ever became a tyranny, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know,” Senator Church said on NBC’s Meet the Press in 1975. “I don’t want to see this country ever go across the bridge. I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision, so that we never cross over that abyss.”

But the technological capacities that Church warned about grew stronger during the presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama. President Bush signed an executive order in 2002 authorizing the NSA to eavesdrop on U.S. citizens and foreign nationals if the government suspected that they had ties to terrorists.

Even though President Obama promised to curb data collection of U.S. citizens, he greatly expanded the power of America’s entrenched surveillance state. During his administration, intelligence agents illegally monitored journalists, members of Congress, the Trump presidential campaign and millions of American citizens. Even though Barack Obama is no longer president, most of the 850,000 people who held top-secret clearances in his administration are still on the job.

The Fourth Branch of Government. Whether we call it the deep state or something else, it is undeniable that Washington has a deeply embedded bureaucracy that has existed for decades. Many of these bureaucrats staunchly opposed President Trump and his inner circle. The problems this reality creates represent an enormous distortion of how America’s Founding Fathers established the government.

When the framers of the U.S. Constitution designed three coequal branches of government, they gave the legislative branch the power to write laws, the judicial branch the power to interpret laws, and the executive branch the power to enforce laws. The gigantic bureaucracy many Americans think of when they think of the federal government is not in the Constitution at all. It is supposed to exist only to serve the executive branch—which is the president—in carrying out its constitutional duties. Instead it has become an unelected fourth branch of government.

Early presidents were assisted by a limited number of officials whom they nominated and appointed. About 1,000 nonmilitary employees assisted George Washington. A century later, about 40,000 nonmilitary employees assisted Benjamin Harrison. Less than 50 years later, Franklin Roosevelt swelled the number of federal bureaucrats to an all-time high of 3.5 million nonmilitary employees. Today, there are 2,794,000 federal employees in 15 departments, 69 agencies and 383 nonmilitary sub-agencies. This sprawling administrative state consumed $3.98 trillion in 2017, one fifth of America’s total economic output.

These unelected bureaucrats are technically supposed to report to the president, but there are far too many of them to manage. New presidents appoint less than 1 percent of federal positions. The other 99 percent are career bureaucrats. This is why most federal agencies have evolved into independent entities over which the president has limited control. The deep state doesn’t just consist of intelligence agents; it’s much bigger than that. This is seriously concerning to anyone who believes America’s strength, stability and survival depend on the principles of individual freedom in constitutional government.

“This exponential growth has led to increasing power and independence for agencies,” wrote Georgetown law professor Jonathan Turley in a Washington Post editorial. “The shift of authority has been staggering. The fourth branch now has a larger practical impact on the lives of citizens than all the other branches combined.” One study found that elected lawmakers in Congress enacted 138 public laws in 2007—whereas unelected federal bureaucrats established 2,926 regulations.

A similar study found that federal judges conduct roughly 95,000 proceedings each year, compared to 939,000 cases tried by administrative “courts” tied to individual federal agencies in the executive branch. Subverting the separation of powers established in the Constitution, many federal bureaucracies possess all three powers of the legislature (regulations), the judiciary (administrative “courts”) and the executive (enforcement by armed agents).

If Americans are no longer governed by laws passed by their elected representatives, they no longer live in a democratic republic. They live in an authoritarian technocracy run by powerful, unelected bureaucrats, civil servants, military leaders and intelligence agents.

Revenge of the Bureaucrats. Donald Trump was a political outsider who had promised to shrink the government (“drain the swamp”), which returns power over an individual’s life to his state government, local government or himself. The president’s former chief strategist, Steve Bannon, said the “deconstruction of the administrative state” was a core objective of the Trump administration. Even after Bannon left, President Trump stepped up his war on federal regulations, vowing to shrink the Code of Federal Regulations by an astounding 87 percent.

“The never-ending growth of red tape in America has come to a sudden, screeching and beautiful halt,” he said. “We’re going to cut a ribbon because we’re getting back below the 1960 level, and we’ll be there fairly quickly.”

To accomplish this goal, President Trump signed an executive order requiring federal agencies to cut two old regulations for every new regulation they pass. He used budget cuts and a hiring freeze to reduce the federal workforce by almost 17,000 employees. He also laid out a plan to fill the courts with judges dedicated to challenging the growing power of federal agencies to make, interpret and enforce federal regulations.

All of this reduces the authority of government bureaucrats who derive their relevance, their lifestyles and their paychecks from taxpayer dollars paid to them in return for them micromanaging people’s lives.

Therefore, federal officials had strong motives to subvert the president’s agenda. Days after President Trump was inaugurated and established a travel ban on several Middle Eastern nations, the interim head of the Justice Department refused to implement it. Shortly thereafter, the Washington Post reported that bureaucrats were seeking advice from Obama-era appointees on how to push back against the Trump administration (which, constitutionally, they were supposed to be serving). Bureaucrats carefully timed and carefully targeted leaks of information that they thought would damage the president. They provide this information to powerful, sympathetic media channels in an attempt to undermine the new administration.

Deep State Coup d’état. While federal bureaucrats were trying to subvert the president’s agenda, top brass at the FBI tried to subvert the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Recovered text messages exchanged by FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page reveal that Strzok told FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe that the department needed an “insurance policy” in case Donald Trump was elected. At the heart of this “insurance policy” was a dossier produced by strategic intelligence firm Fusion GPS. It claimed the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to steal the election.

This dossier was paid for by Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and none of its claims have been verified. Still, the FBI used the dossier to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to spy on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. By applying a “two-hop” rule, this warrant allowed the FBI to spy on Page, anyone connected to Page, and anyone connected to anyone connected to Page, potentially including Mr. Trump himself.

Despite knowing that the dossier was unverified, Barack Obama called a meeting of key officials from the U.S. intelligence community on Jan. 5, 2017, to discuss how the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign could continue after Mr. Trump was sworn in as president. This meeting included then CIA director John Brennan, then FBI director James Comey, NSA director Michael Rogers and then Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. They discussed how to continue an investigation on the sitting president. If they could have kept Donald Trump out of office, they would have effectively staged a coup d’état by overturning the results of a democratic election.

Former FBI director Robert Mueller lead a Special Counsel investigation into allegations of Russian interference into the 2016 presidential election. Even though he has not turned up any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, Democrats like Rep. Al Green and billionaire Tom Steyer continued using the rumors generated by Clinton’s Steele dossier as weapons in an ongoing campaign to impeach President Trump.

This was the “insurance policy” Strzok and McCabe discussed. If deep-state agents can use unverified rumors to keep a political candidate they don’t like out of office, what can’t they do? What happens when the intelligence community goes rogue and starts fighting its own boss? In the past, in nations like Turkey and Egypt, people have risen up against the deep state when it tried to overturn the results of a democratic election. The rift between President Trump and the American deep state was more serious than most people realize. The president was at war with the most technologically advanced surveillance state to ever exist, and things stand to get violent.

Revolution or Civil War. Americans today are not living in the nation of their Founding Fathers, or even of their own fathers. The nation’s government is evolving away from the constitutional republic it once was into an authoritarian technocracy.

President Trump was leading a populist revolt against the “American Deep State.”

Amazon Web Services

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 6, 2021 by andelino

We are all used to Amazon delivering packages to our doors and mailboxes. But did you know that Amazon also delivers virtually every filmed video in the United States to your screen?

According to an article at the American Prospect, Amazon Web Services (AWS) provides service to 32 percent of the Internet. However, the dominance of AWS expands further when examining digital video delivery in the United States.

“AWS is the back-end provider for Netflix, Disney+, Hulu, Paramount+, Peacock, HBO Max, Discovery+, and of course, Amazon Prime. As of February of this year, that list includes the top six streaming services in the U.S. by subscribers; Discovery+, which is not on that list, is merging with HBO Max, and Paramount+ didn’t launch until March. Just from those top six, 558.8 million U.S. subscribers rely on AWS to get their streaming video. Yes, this is more people than live in the United States; that’s because, as you doubtless know, many people subscribe to more than one streaming service.”

Over 550 million streaming accounts in the U.S. are run by AWS. In addition, every major movie studio (Disney, Universal, Warner Bros., and Paramount) stream their new releases on services run by AWS. Even movie theaters receive their new releases via a cloud, which is run by, you guessed it, AWS.

Not only is movie distribution relying on Amazon Web Services for distribution and digital infrastructure, but over 1,600 television channels utilize AWS. That includes Fox, Viacom, CBS and the Discovery families of networks.

“If you are watching a filmed piece of entertainment on any screen at a theater, at home or on your phone through a digital direct-to-customer stream, on a television network, or on a streaming service, the odds are extremely likely that you’re making use of AWS.”

No matter which service you choose to use, Amazon has some amount of control in having it delivered to your screen: They have a phantom monopoly on the filmed media industry in the United States. This phantom monopoly should concern us all because Amazon has a track record of censoring content that does not align with its political agenda. Amazon has barely flexed its censorship muscles but has already shown what power it holds.

The most significant censorship by Amazon was the removal of Parler from its servers, giving the social media company only 24 hours’ notice on January 10. This was in conjunction with Apple and Google banning Parler from their app stores. Amazon claims Parler violated the service agreement by allowing violent content to be shared on its platform. The Amazon e-mail stated that it “cannot provide services to a customer that is unable to effectively identify and remove content that encourages or incites violence against others.”

After the January 6 protests, Parler did not ban content about election fraud, President Donald Trump or any other opinion. Other Big Tech companies banned President Trump and have since censored any content about election fraud, Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness, and the integrity of the 2020 presidential election. These opinions do not align with those of these tech giants.

While these Big Tech companies have blocked individuals or certain content, Amazon has the power to completely blot out websites at a whim. Thirty-two percent of the Internet is run on Amazon Web Services. That is a lot of power for a company that may decide your opinions “encourage or incite violence” or violate any of its vague service agreement clauses.

Another instance occurred when Amazon removed the documentary “Created Equal on Justice Clarence Thomas” from its streaming service with no warning or notice. According to the Wall Street Journal: Director Michael Pack said that Created Equal was doing well on Amazon, so it wasn’t pulled because no one wanted to see it. “For a while our film was, briefly, No. 1 in documentaries. And I think it’s still No. 25 or 30, so it’s been selling,” he said. Notably, he added, less-popular documentaries about Anita Hill and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg continue to be available for streaming on Amazon. “So why don’t they offer Created Equal? There’s obviously customer demand.”

Amazon has not given an explanation on why it suddenly decided to remove a documentary on a conservative minded Supreme Court justice (contractually it is not required to provide an explanation). But this is not the first time Amazon has removed content, as WSJ explained:

“If this episode sounds familiar, it’s because Amazon pulled a similar stunt last fall. Eli Steele’s What Killed Michael Brown?—a critique of liberal social policies that was written and narrated by his father, the race scholar Shelby Steele—was slated to stream on Amazon in October, then held up for reasons the company never fully explained.”

Amazon eventually relented and made the film available, but only after these pages weighed in and made a fuss. The documentary was picked up by the Daily Wire and is available to view on its website. This is an example of Amazon censoring content it directly controls. But as seen through the Parler example, it can remove the support servers for any of the businesses that use AWS.

While most of these streaming corporations lean left and allow unspeakably immoral content on their platform for millions of Americans to consume, it is doubtful any would allow their company to be destroyed for the sake of free speech. Amazon has enough leverage over the industry to cause universal censorship. This behavior has been manifest in another Amazon business line.

In addition to its dominance in the film industry, Amazon also controls 83 % of the book market. So what happens if the book you are selling does not align with Amazon’s opinions?

In early 2021, Amazon banned the book When Harry Became Sally, by conservative Ryan T. Anderson, which provides a different view on the transgender movement. The book was first released in 2018 and was one of the bestsellers on Amazon. The official Amazon policy states:

“We don’t sell certain content including content that we determine is hate speech, promotes the abuse or sexual exploitation of children, contains pornography, glorifies rape or pedophilia, advocates terrorism, or other material we deem inappropriate or offensive.”

Amazon sold the book in 2018, 2019 and 2020, but decided in 2021 that it is in violation of these guidelines. Three Republican senators wrote to Amazon asking for an explanation on the decision. Amazon responded by saying it has “chosen not to sell books that frame lgbtq+ identity as a mental illness.”

To add to the confusion, in May 2021 Amazon decided to keep selling Abigail Shrier’s book “Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters.” Nearly 500 Amazon employees have signed a petition to have the book removed. At least two Amazon employees have resigned in protest. In 2020, Amazon refused to allow paid promotions of Ms. Shrier’s book.

In addition to the books that challenge the radical-leftist view of transgenderism, Amazon also temporarily banned criticism of the reaction to Covid-19, as NBC News writes:

Last year, Amazon blocked the selling of a self-published e-book that claimed the harms of the coronavirus were overstated, but reversed its decision after Elon Musk tweeted that the company’s decision was “insane.”

Amazon has been so inconsistent and vague that its unpredictability only allows censorship to be easier in the future. Would Amazon ever leverage its dominance in the film and book industry to censor opposing opinions?

Amazon’s new CEO is left-leaning Andy Jassy, who was leading Amazon Web Services when it de-platformed Parler, he’s now over the entire company. Amazon has censored before, and it likely will again. The war over censorship is moving toward a climactic battle.

After the January 6 protests, Big Tech acted in a concerted manner to censor any news or opinions that claimed the riot was not a terrorist attack or insurrection. Michelle Obama wrote a letter to Big Tech CEO’s to censor Donald Trump and conservatives and they did her bidding. However, since the Biden administration has taken power, it has escalated to state-sponsored censorship.

The Wall Street Journal ran an article that quotes a letter from two Democrat representatives addressed to Amazon, Apple, Google and cable companies. It reported:

“The letter is a demand for more ideological censorship. Our country’s public discourse is plagued by misinformation, disinformation, conspiracy theories and lies,” write Reps. Anna Eshoo and Jerry McNerney. They quote a claim that right-wing media is “much more susceptible,” and demand to know why Amazon’s Fire TV carries certain conservative programs.

Since when have lawmakers asked private companies to censor their political opponents? On July 15, the New York Post reported that the Biden administration is compiling a list of posts for Facebook to censor: “White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said the Biden administration is identifying ‘problematic’ posts for Facebook to censor because they contain ‘misinformation’ about Covid-19.”

Is Big Tech virtually another branch of the U.S. government? President Donald Trump is suing Facebook, Twitter and Google for censorship, claiming that the companies are acting as government agents, working hand-in-glove with the radical left. The battle over Big Tech censorship and free speech is ramping up.

Where is all of this leading? There will come a time in the future when free speech will be unavailable. The message coming from God’s work will disappear, like food disappearing in a famine. Amos also says that the “land is not able to bear all his words” (Amos 7:10). People in America will not be able to bear the message of warning and will seek to censor that message.

Besides the other tech giants, it is not hard to imagine how a company like Amazon, which has such a dominant influence on the Internet, film industry and online bookselling, could cause a famine of God’s Word.

That time is not here yet. God does deliver America from bitter affliction for a short period of time (2 Kings 14:26-27). What does this mean for you?

Watch and observe where Big Tech censorship is leading.

The Nazi Takeover

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on September 6, 2021 by andelino

The Nazi Democrat Party is trying it’s best to take over the country. President Trump is the first president to actually do what he said he was going to do for us after winning an election. He actually did something that actually made our lives better. Unlike the past presidents since our last great president, Ronald Reagan, all of them including the last Republican president, George Bush, who was a weak president as far as Conservative values were concerned, along with the Obama transformation years, President Trump actually kept his word. President Trump didn’t lie to get into office. He didn’t promise the public what he thought they wanted to hear just to get elected.

President Trump actually had a vision of making America great again, like it’s glory years. He didn’t keep just one promise, but most. The only ones that weren’t realized as of yet, was because of the Nazi Democrats running interference and constantly assaulting the office with false charges just to slow down the great progress. But even with all the Nazi Democrat’s traitorous acts, he still got many things done, and made America more prosperous and safer, for all Americans, no matter your race, religion or economic status.

Unlike the Nazi Democrats which only did things that made their elected officials better off financially or by gaining more power over the average American citizen. The Nazi Democrats are simply all about control over the public, Mainly by promoting a communistic or socialistic agenda. They’re all about power and control and nothing to do about making our lives any better. They destroy our culture, or heritage and our social fabric, piece by piece.

If you are old enough to remember WWII, then you understand the dangers of a Socialist or Communist government. You would understand how the actions the Nazi Democrats have used are the same tactics to take over a country, piece by piece. The Nazi Democrat Party likes to throw around the name of Hitler and comparing everyone that disagrees with anything they say to Hitler. It’s ironic since the Nazi Democrats are the ones that truly employ Hitler’s plan for the takeover of a country to enslave its citizens.

Yes, the Nazi Democrat Party is also the party of slavery. They fought to keep blacks as slaves while Republicans fought to free the slaves. It’s a quandary for most people as to why so many blacks still support the party that continues to put the chains back on them as Joe Biden so eloquently said in one of his speeches. He was talking about the Nazi Democrats in reality.  Add to that the Nazi Democrats have murdered millions of babies at their satanic false altar of worship, then you have such a strong parallel to the actions of Hitler. The Nazi Democrat Party is responsible for the slaughter of millions of infants and they won’t be happy until they can kill millions more in the killing fields of their planned parenthood abortion baby killing mills.

The scope of Hitler’s master plan is too lengthy to cover in this post, so we will only highlight the most dangerous ones. They are as follows:

  • Take Control Of The Schools – To Propagandize Young Minds From The Start
  • Take Control Of The Churches – Try To Control What A Pastor Can Or Cannot Teach
  • Gun Control – They’ve Been Trying To Take Guns Away For Decades – An Unarmed Populace Is Easier To Take Over
  • Cultural And Scientific Cleansing Was Carried Out – Nazis Deemed Everything That Didn’t Serve The Nazi Machine, Had To Disappear.

The ethnic cleansing is in full swing today by the Nazi Democrat Party. In case anyone hasn’t noticed the Nazi Democrats have focused on Christians, Jews and white people in an attempt to remove their influence on society. The Nazi Democrat Party is doing just what Hitler did and not enough people see it because the further we get in time from WWII, the fewer people are around that witnessed the horrors of the Nazis first hand, or were taught about it in school.

Since the Nazi Democrat Party has taken over the schools in America, they have rewritten the history books with propaganda to support their Nazi ambitions. They leave out the facts and truths of moments in history and replace them with lies and falsehoods and teach it to our kids. The Nazi Democrat Party, just as Hitler’s Nazi party before them, use children as a tool, and take advantage of them to mold them into good little slaves for the Nazi Democrat Party. Only time will tell if the America I grew up in, still has what it takes to rise to the occasion when needed. And to put down this hostile takeover by a political group that seeks to dominate the entire nation and make it a nation of slaves to the hybrid socialist Nazi government.

Every war throughout history has depended on resources and supplies. All of that costs money, and lots of it. The country with the finances to run their military, to buy the guns, ships, planes, trucks, tanks, bombs, missiles, etc, controls their destiny. Then you have to be able to buy the things that make them work, like the ammo, gas, oil, tires and so forth. Whether it’s a physical war with conventional weaponry and machinery, or if it’s a legal war, or a war of propaganda to influence and control the thinking of the nation, it still takes money.

The Nazi Democrat Party has followed in Hitler’s footsteps, following his evil plan closely when Barack Hussein Obama gained power in America. He didn’t take control with military might. He took control with his band of thugs and evil supporters that comprised the Nazi Democrat Party. There were several key events that occurred before that could happen. First Barack Obama had to make people think he was looking out for their best interest, through lies and deceit, which he did through a massive propaganda war unleashed on the unsuspecting public.

Most of the American population had no idea of what Obama was really all about. He talked a good game, and was a great speaker and motivator. He worked people into a euphoric frenzy to the point they were on board for all the false promises he offered them. He did this with the help of the Nazi Democrat Party. Obama understood one thing for certain, if you tell a lie to the people long enough, many will start to believe it. As did the vast majority of the American people. The Nazi Democrat Party in the US as well as the main stream media services know that all too well and have used the tactic for decades.

After Barack Obama gained political power, the public realized the horrible life changing mistake they made by trusting and believing in his promises. They found out they voted in a person who wasn’t all about making their lives and their country a better place. They realized too late that they voted in a mad man, an evil individual that would begin the Nazi transformation. The American people went from free and proud people, to prisoners and slaves to an evil dictator. Simply expressing a view that the Nazi Democrat Party didn’t allow, would bring about swift and decisive actions that would destroy their lives, from personal attacks to destruction of their homes or businesses to beatings or being put to death. Sometimes the offending American citizen that uttered the words the Nazi party found offensive, would just simply disappear, never to be heard from again.

Barack Obama accomplished this by several key acts that swiftly moved him into the all powerful dictator role over the American people.

  • Take Over The Schools
  • Abolish The Church
  • Gun Control Was Implemented – An Unarmed Populace Is Easier To Take Over
  • Many politically-suspect and civil servants were dismissed.
  • Cultural And Scientific Cleansing Was Carried Out – Nazis Deemed Everything That Didn’t Serve The Nazi Ambitions, Had To Disappear.

Sounds too eerily like Adolph Hitler and the Nazi machine of WWII.

Is Obama Copying Adolph Hitler?

Traitors for the Ages

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on September 5, 2021 by andelino

Over the last three decades, China has undergone an electrifying rags-to-riches ascent at America’s expense. Its stunning rise could never have occurred without the willing assistance of four U.S. presidents who sold-out their country’s workers and then stood by and clapped as China ate America’s lunch.

A friend of mine who has traveled China extensively described what the country was like 30 years ago. Its cities were sprawling, impoverished places with dirt roads and low-rise structures. With few automobiles in the country back then, the Chinese people got around mostly by bicycles and motor scooters. The country had only a few tall buildings and just two large airports, in Beijing, its capitol, and Shanghai, its financial center. China had no modern highways, bridges or high-speed rails, and the only trains that traversed the country were pulled by antiquated steam engines.

Fast forward. To see how dramatically things have changed in Wuhan, please watch this 40-sec. clip of the Chinese city where COVID-19 originated.

The Wuhan of today bears no resemblance to the backward, desperately poor place it was just three decades ago, and the same is true of cities throughout the country.

Over the last 30 years, China has undergone a stupendous, caterpillar-to-butterfly transformation that has created some of the world’s most eye-popping roadways, bridges and architecture. Now within sight of overtaking the U.S. as the world’s dominate economy, China has also built a massively lethal military that poses a serious threat America’s long-standing combat superiority, as reported by the Washington Times, China’s military is forcing the Pentagon to confront the end of U.S. battlefield dominance.

From where did the money come that funded China’s dramatic makeover from a Third World backwater to an economic and military superpower? Trillions of dollars used to finance its spectacular ascendancy was willingly handed over by its greatest enabler: the United States of America.

Since the late 1980s, China was allowed to extract trillions of dollars from the U.S. economy in the form of massive trade surpluses. As a result, the communist nation now has glistening cities like Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Wuhan, while America is saddled with fading cities like Baltimore, Detroit, Chicago and Atlanta, once-thriving metropolises now marred by urban blight, inner city slums, rampant crime, sorry schools, generational poverty and other canaries in the coal mine of a nation in steep decline.

And to rub salt in America’s self-inflicted wounds, Chinese nationals who were allowed to attend our top research universities and work at our most sensitive high-tech companies stole America blind, surreptitiously sending many of our nation’s most vital technological and national defense secrets to the communist adversary hell-bent on chopping America off at its knees.

During the presidencies of George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama, China was allowed to rip America a new one in what will go down as the most lopsided trade and stolen technology bludgeoning in the history of nations. 

But don’t blame China for the trade imbalances. Its leaders were just doing what a nation’s leaders are expected to do: negotiate the best deal they can get. If the country on the other side of the table is willing to absorb an epic thrashing in the process, so much the better. And the voluntary thrashing America took lasted 28 consecutive years, from 1989 to 2017, a period when much of America’s manufacturing base was allowed to sell-out its workers by Offshoring production to China and other low-wage nations.

With America’s worn-out infrastructure badly in need of replacement, our political class instead ran up crushing debt and deficits, squandering trillions of dollars stolen from future generations on endless foreign wars and failed social programs. 

Meanwhile, China was using its trade-surplus windfall and stolen technology bonanza to build some of the world’s most impressive cities and a fearsome military. 

When President Trump took office in 2017, the U.S. began a strategic shift in its approach to China.  Unless its relationship with the communist superpower is redefined, America’s days in the sun will be over, and the 21st century will be known as the “Chinese Century.”

Below are nine videos you do not want to miss. Each is a visual reminder that China’s stunning rise at America’s expense could never have occurred without assistance from the four U.S. presidents who stood by and clapped as the communist nation ate America’s lunch. Viewing the videos will take a while, but doing so will help you see with your own eyes that while America was inching along on its hands and knees, a house of cards propped up by ruinous debt and deficits, China was making the most impressive great leap forward the world has ever seen.

Click here to see China’s stunning road network. In 1988, China had no modern highways; today, its world class road network extends an astounding 84,000 miles, the longest and most impressive road system in the world.

Click here to see China’s magnificent Beipanjiang Bridge, the highest bridge in the world. Of the world’s ten tallest bridges, eight are in China, zero in America.

Click here to see China’s incomparable Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge, the longest ocean crossing bridge in the world. Designed to last 120 years, the $15 billion bridge-tunnel structure is a testament to China’s engineering might.

Click here to see China’s jaw-dropping 9-tower “horizontal skyscraper” in Chongqing. Known as “The Crystal,” the complex’s horizontal sky bridge straddles four 60-story skyscrapers, 820 feet in the air. Built at a cost of $3.6 billion, the mixed use mega structure has a shopping mall with 450 stores. Is there anything like this in America? Of the world’s 25 tallest skyscrapers, 14 are in China, only two in the U.S.

Click here to see a dynamic chart of China’s meteoric ascendancy to the world’s No. 2 economy. What this 3-min. video shows will blow your mind.

Click here to see China’s stupendous Beijing Daxing International Airport. The world’s largest airport, Daxing can handle up to 250 takeoffs and landings per hour. By comparison, America’s busiest airport, Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson, accommodates just 100 total movements per hour. Business Insider’s 2018 list of the 14 most beautiful airports in the world includes three in China, zero in the U.S. 

Click here to see how the U.S. auto industry was allowed to sell-out its workers by Offshoring jobs to China and other countries with dirt-cheap labor, a betrayal that propelled Trump to the presidency in 2016.

Click here to see China’s most powerful weapons, including nuclear-armed ICBM’s that can reach the U.S. in 30 minutes. Three decades ago, China’s military was primarily land-based; today, it boasts a 2-million-man army, the world’s largest blue-water navy, the world’s third largest air force and advanced cyber and anti-satellite weaponry that could be the deciding factor in a war against America. 

Click here to see Chinese female soldiers on dress parade, as impressive display of military precision as you’ll likely ever see.

Finally, my friend believes America’s best days are behind it. Having done business throughout China for many years, he observed that Chinese workers are intensely proud of their country, eagerly working as tirelessly as a colony of ants toward a common goal of national unity and ascendancy.

America once was blessed with widespread patriotism, but over the last half-century has been polarized into two camps with diametrically opposite objectives. One side believes America should continue as a two-party constitutional democracy, the other wants that system scrapped in favor of single-party socialist rule.

With our country more bitterly divided than at any time since the Civil War, half of America will continue working at cross purposes with the other half. A country at irreconcilable odds with itself is not a recipe for national ascendancy; it’s a recipe for national decline.

The winner? China.

Woke Military

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , on August 29, 2021 by andelino

The most powerful military on Earth is being systematically dismantled. After 20 years of war, around 75,000 tribesmen humiliated the United States by conquering Afghanistan in under two weeks. When the press asked Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, how such a debacle could happen, he responded: “There was nothing that I saw that indicated a collapse of this army and this government in 11 days.” His comments came just after the New York Times reported that U.S. intelligence had been warning the Taliban could take over Afghanistan if the U.S. withdrew.

Apparently, General Milley either did not read those reports or did not care what they said. On June 23, he was busy admonishing lawmakers that it was important for soldiers to study critical race theory.

“The United States Military Academy is a university, and it is important that we train and we understand,” he said. “I want to understand white rage. I’m white and I want to understand it. So what is it that caused thousands of people to assault this building and try to overturn the Constitution of the United States of America? I’ve read Mao Tse-Tung. I’ve read Karl Marx. I’ve read Lenin. That doesn’t make me a Communist. So what is wrong with understanding, having some situational understanding about the country for which we are here to defend? I personally find it offensive that we are accusing the United States military, our general officers, our commissioned and non-commissioned officers, of being ‘woke’ or something else because we’re studying some theories that are out there.”

Instead of trying to understand “white rage,” maybe General Milley should have spent more time trying to understand “Islamic rage.” Because while he was busy blaming the January 6 protests on white supremacy and renewing the military’s commitment to “diversity, inclusion and equity,” the Taliban was conquering Afghanistan’s rural provinces and preparing to besiege its cities.

If General Milley has read as much Marx, Lenin and Mao as he claims, then he should know that critical race theory is a Marxist philosophy that substitutes race for class in an attempt to create a revolutionary coalition of ethnic minorities against a white majority. It does not help a person understand “white rage.” It helps destroy a nation or institution through race war.

The Navy’s reading list for sailors includes: “How to Be an Anti-Racist,” by critical race theorist Ibram X. Kendi; “The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness,” by Michelle Alexander; and “Sexual Minorities and Politics”, by Jason Pierceson. This list fosters division by encouraging servicemen to accuse their country and each other of systemic racism and white supremacy. As Daniel Greenfield wrote in an article titled While Afghanistan Fell, Military and CIA Focused on Diversity,” American pows used to be starved, beaten and had bamboo shoots driven under their fingernails without repeating the Marxist dogma they were now indoctrinated with. But hardly a week goes by now without another litany of Marxist confessions at military struggle sessions.

Now, generals who try to warn America about Marxism are ostracized. In May, Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier was relieved of his command for promoting his self-published book, Irresistible Revolution: Marxism’s Goal of Conquest & the Unmaking of the American Military which reached the top spot on Amazon’s bestseller list. During his May 14 appearance on the Information Operation podcast with host L. Todd Wood, Colonel Lohmeier claimed that new military diversity training programs were steeped in Marxism and critical race theory. “Our diversity, inclusion and equity industry and the training we’re receiving in the military via that industry are rooted in critical race theory, which is rooted in Marxism,” he said before recounting how he was given a training manual that cited the January 6 protests as an example of extremism, while ignoring the Black Lives Matter riots that took place following the death of George Floyd at the hands of a police officer last year. Apparently, these comments were enough to get him ousted.

A number of people were surprised when Colonel Lohmeier was fired, but it seems that he may only be the beginning of a much larger military purge. Defense Secretary Lloyd James Austin has hired critical race theorist Bishop Garrison as the Pentagon’s new extremism czar, tasked with purging extremists from the military. His Countering Extremism Working Group will now be monitoring the Internet search histories and social media posts of military personnel, looking for evidence of “extremist behavior.” And to circumvent First Amendment restrictions on government monitoring, Garrison’s group will be paying a private surveillance firm to trawl through the social media accounts of troops to make sure that they are sufficiently “woke” for the U.S. military.

The government has arrested dozens of service members connected to the January 6 protests, but Garrison is likely going after a lot more people than those who participated in those rallies. He supports the New York Times’ 1619 Project and has made Twitter posts alleging that only racists, misogynists, and extremists support Donald Trump. His definition of what constitutes “extremist” behavior likely includes anyone who supports Trump, believes in the U.S. Constitution, opposes critical race theory, or thinks the election was stolen.

Donald Trump has already blamed Joe Biden and his “woke” generals for the Afghan debacle, saying they should have at least blown up the military bases in Afghanistan to prevent the weapons from falling to the Taliban. But it seems the current administration is more concerned about stirring up a civil war in America than about fighting terrorism or winning wars overseas. History shows that when a nation falls into division and infighting, it quickly becomes consumed by crises that leave it vulnerable to attack by foreign enemies.

The Biden administration’s efforts to fundamentally transform America’s military are creating a dangerous level of ideological division. Currently, America’s “woke” military is retreating from foreign enemies, but it may soon be literally fighting itself!

Cyber Symposium

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on August 28, 2021 by andelino

Minnesota businessman Mike Lindell held a three-day Cyber Symposium in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, August 10-12. Its purpose was to expose how the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) used Dominion Voting Machines to steal the 2020 United States presidential election from Donald Trump.

The symposium got off to a rocky start as hackers took down the live stream for around an hour, and Dominion sued two news networks that sent representatives to the event—Newsmax and One America News.

Still, the symposium gave at least 65 cyber forensic experts a chance to examine 37 terabytes of data that Lindell says prove Chinese hackers made Joe Biden the illegitimate president of the United States.

The symposium started with a video exposing how UBS Securities llC helped Staple Street Capital raise $400 million from anonymous investors a month before the 2020 United States presidential election. UBS Securities llC is the New York-based subsidiary of Swiss bank UBS, which has offices owned by the Chinese government.

And Staple Street Capital is a Wall Street private equity firm that owns Dominion Voting Systems. This video also further exposed that Dominion voting machines were connected to the Internet during the election, making them infinitely hack-able.

Steve Bannon gave a speech on the Democrat’s three-stage plan to hijack America. First, use a virus engineered by the CCP to lock down the economy and flood ballot boxes with fraudulent mail-in ballots. Second, use voting machines built with CCP hardware to hack the election. Third, infiltrate the January 6 protests and use the violence to slur anyone who says the election was stolen.

The son of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro appeared at the symposium after meeting with Donald Trump in New York. He gave a speech on how corrupt officials are also using Brazil’s electronic voting systems to rig elections and how democracies need to use paper ballots that can be audited.

Mesa County, Colorado, clerk Tina Peters told a shocking story about how the Colorado secretary of state raided her office after she promised to release irrefutable proof that the 2020 presidential election was stolen. The conservative website shared screenshots of passwords linked to Mesa County’s voting system, which they say came from Ron Watkins, a well-known figure in the QAnon movement. Since Tina Peters believes the election was stolen, the Colorado secretary of state is accusing her of leaking the passwords to Watkins. Peters denies these charges but has decided to refrain from releasing any data proving election fraud until the investigation winds down.

Dr. Douglas G. Frank, a physicist, chemist and mathematician, discussed troubling mathematical patterns in the election results, indicating that hackers artificially manipulated them. He continues this analysis on subsequent days, helped by the dozens of other forensic cyber experts at the symposium. Mike Lindell has offered a $5 million reward to any analyst who can conclusively disprove the election was stolen from the “packet captures” (pcaps) being analyzed.

Mike Lindell’s Cyber Symposium proved that Communist China is waging Cyberwar on America; that Communist China has financial ties to Dominion Voting Systems; that Dominion voting machines can be hacked; and that there are troubling statistical anomalies in the voter data rolls generated by Dominion voting machines. Only a year ago, White House National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien warned that China was targeting U.S. election infrastructure with cyber attacks. So you would think more people would take Lindell’s cyber symposium seriously.

Decades ago, before the U.S. even established diplomatic relations with Communist China, we were warned that Communist forces would strip America of its historically unprecedented, God-given blessings. “We are not fighting a single nation in a military war, but a gigantic, worldwide, plain-clothes army, masquerading as a political party, seeking to conquer the world with an entirely new kind of warfare. It’s a kind of warfare we don’t understand or know how to cope with. It uses every diabolical means to weaken us from within, sapping our strength, perverting our morals, sabotaging our educational system, wrecking our social structure, destroying our spiritual and religious life, weakening our industrial and economic power, demoralizing our armed forces, and finally, after such infiltration, overthrowing our government by force and violence! All this cleverly disguised as a harmless political party!”

American-style communism is consuming America from within, while Chinese-style communism is besieging America from without. This attack has become so bad that the American people no longer even control their elections. Instead, they rely on scandal-plagued voting machine companies to count their votes for them even when it is public knowledge that these companies are owned by anti-American activists with deep ties to foreign nationals. It is no exaggeration to say that if the American people do not take back control of their elections soon, they will lose their country.

Representatives from every state attended the symposium and many are now returning home intent on looking at how their own elections were compromised. There is a lot of evidence of election fraud. Democrats spent all four years of President Trump’s tenure trying to bring him down, and here they finally succeeded. Yet the courts didn’t want to get involved. Politicians and the media did their best to cover it up.

There is no doubt that the election was stolen. Other people will have to study this and decide for themselves what they think about it. Each of us has to make a judgment on this and walk by his or her faith.

Now more of that theft is being exposed—though too few are working to look back at that stolen election.

My Pillow Fight

See more at Cyber Symposium

Political Self Defense

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on August 27, 2021 by andelino

Op-Ed by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America

Very unfair what is happening to Andrew Cuomo, Democrat governor of the Great State of New York. We’ve had our disagreements in the past, but I know a Witch Hunt when I see one (Russia, Russia, Russia!). I hear the Radical Left wants to impeach him, just like Crazy Nancy and Cryin’ Chuck tried to impeach Trump. I survived, twice, and so can Governor Cuomo.

If I were advising the Governor, I would tell him to look into the massive fraud in Queens County Forensic audit? Where are the servers? Regarding impeachment, I would tell him to “relax.” He is not so different from me. We’re proud New Yorkers. We’ve been accused of “literally killing people.” We’re admired for our good looks and sexual prowess, a powerful gift that also can be a curse. We’ve been targeted by false accusations, attacked by “lightweight” politicians in our own party.

For many years, I thought crooked Hillary Clinton was the most corrupt politician in America. That was before I learned about New York Attorney General Letitia James. Like her phony Trump investigations, the AG’s so-called “report” on the Governor has all the markings of a Witch Hunt. Many of these women, for example, are simply too ugly to be “harassed.” They lie because they want money or attention. I’m sure Andrew would agree.

The key to surviving a Democrat Impeachment Hoax is, in my experience, having done absolutely nothing wrong in the first place. Imagine my surprise that Crazy Nancy and “the Squad” would waste everyone’s time over one of the most beautiful phone calls ever made. Even the Ukrainian president said it was PERFECT. Acquitted for life! Rich people like to say the first million dollars is the hardest; it gets much easier after that. The same could be said about impeachment. The second time was a distraction from the rigged election that I won by A LOT. Acquitted for life, again!

I have a long history of opposing perverts in New York, but it saddens me to see Governor Cuomo being compared to real scumbags like Bill Clinton and Anthony Weiner. First and foremost, he did nothing wrong! The losers and haters who want to impeach him are the same Radical Left Democrats who tried to impeach me. They won’t succeed, but even if they do, I hereby pledge to fully pardon the Governor for all crimes—past, present, and future—as soon as I am reinstated as legitimate commander in chief of this wonderful Country.

Donald J. Trump is an Ivy League graduate, successful business magnate, and 45th president of the United States. He is arguably the “most successful leader” in American history, apart from MAYBE Abraham Lincoln, based on what people are saying. 

ActBlue Kicks Cuomo Off Platform

10 Disgusting Details From the Andrew Cuomo Sexual Harassment Report

GOP Amendment to Infrastructure Bill Would Block Funding for Cuomo’s New York

Cuomo Aides Recruited Pro-LGBT Activist To Help Discredit Governor’s Accuser

LGBT Group Renews Contract With President Who Helped Smear Cuomo Accuser

Time’s Up Founder Helped Cuomo Team Smear Governor’s Accuser

Infrastructure Deal

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on August 25, 2021 by andelino

The United States Senate passed the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure deal. The 2,700-page bill had the backing of 19 Republicans, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. The group voted to end the debate on the bill early to allow quicker passage.

The Republican RINO’s supporting the bill are claiming a victory, as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act is a greatly reduced version of the original $3.5 trillion budget proposed by the Biden administration. Republican supporters claim Biden’s plans for “human infrastructure” spending to expand climate change actions, education, child care and Medicare benefits are mostly gone from the bill. But the Democrats are rushing the bill through the Senate because this is only the first step in their plan to spend trillions of dollars.

Republican Sen. Kevin Cramer indicated that only $450 billion is being spent on “hard” infrastructure, like roads and bridges. The other $800 billion is being spent on climate change initiatives, clean energy research, massive government expansion into the energy network, and sweeping government regulations against motor vehicles. The bill is actually a Trojan horse for the agenda of the radical left to transform America.

The details of the bill reveal that the Infrastructure Deal is deceptive. Despite claiming to be bipartisan, key Republican supporters of the bill happen to have funding for special projects in their districts, such as $50 billion for a dam in Sen. Mitt Romney’s district and money to repair the Alaska Highway in Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s district.

Below are some highlights from the pending bill:

  • $73 billion to move from fossil fuels to clean energy
  • $21 billion for environmental remediation
  • $7.5 billion in electric charger infrastructure; priority given to rural and low-income areas
  • $5 billion for zero- to low-emission buses and $5 billion for adoption of zero- to low-emission buses
  • $1 billion for clean hydrogen electrolysis program
  • $8 billion for regional clean hydrogen hubs (network of hydrogen producers and consumers)
  • $3.2 billion for electric battery development
  • $3.2 billion for electric battery recycling
  • $3.5 billion on carbon capturing
  • $2 million for integrating solar, wind and hydro power.

The bill includes sections on the “promotion of women in the trucking workforce,” designing motor vehicles to measure blood alcohol levels before driving, and safety research on limousines.

Although many of Joe Biden’s original climate change and social programs were not included, the Republicans compromised enough to allow billions for programs resembling the Green New Deal. It is the first trillion-dollar step toward radically transforming the United States’ economy. The Wall Street Journal called it “a major down payment on President Biden’s Green New Deal.”

President Donald Trump issued a statement, saying: “This is not an infrastructure bill; this is the beginning of the Green New Deal.”

The Green New Deal was radical legislation put forward by “Barmaid” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in 2019 that aimed to make the U.S. economy 100 percent reliant on “clean” energy, eliminate poverty, change the diet of Americans to reduce the number of cows, and implement more public ownership of companies. The idea of the bill was favored by many radical liberals but rejected by conservative Republicans, especially by President Trump.

The Green New Deal would mean the collapse of many of the key industries that give the U.S. its economic power. It would also commit America to relying on unproved and unreliable clean energy technology. The Green New Deal was shrouded in climate change language, but was a bid to legislate the communist transformation of America. That is the real goal of the radical left and their climate change agenda.

Such a piece of legislation would be very difficult to pass transparently. Instead, radical lawmakers hide the agenda into other legislation, such as in the latest Infrastructure Act. This is hardly new: Caliph Barack Obama stuffed $90 billion of investment in clean energy into the 2009 stimulus act. It is easy to hide such policies when the legal document is thousands of pages long and Congress votes on it before even reading through the contents.

Billions of dollars are about to be authorized to begin moving this radical agenda forward. But the Infrastructure Deal is actually a Trojan horse for far worse legislation. The bill is paving the way for the passing of the Democrats’ radical $3.5 billion infrastructure plan.

The bipartisan infrastructure bill is part one of a two-phase plan to invest trillions of dollars to transform America. The Democrats made the infrastructure bill “bipartisan” and were willing to “compromise” to smooth the way for phase two, which does not require Republican approval.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer intends to pass the rest of the $3.5 trillion through a process called reconciliation. Using reconciliation would allow the Democrats to pass the budget without needing the 60 Senate votes that are normally required. Even the filibuster cannot stop reconciliation.

This $3.5 trillion “Build Back Better” program devised by the Biden administration was agreed upon in a closed-door negotiation between the White House and the Democratic budget committee. CNBC reported that the agreement had the following:

  • Create a national comprehensive paid family-and-medical-leave program.
  • Fund free universal preschool for all 3- and 4-year-olds.
  • Fund free community college for all students, expand the total amount of Pell Grants, and increase the maximum individual award.
  • Expand access to the summer EBT program, which helps some low-income families with children buy food outside the school year.
  • Extend the $1.9 trillion covid stimulus plan’s provision lowering health insurance premiums for those who buy coverage on their own.
  • Extend the child tax credit expansion that was included in the covid relief bill.

The bill also contains money for clean energy programs, many of which were cut from the bipartisan infrastructure deal during earlier negotiations with Republicans.

These include tax incentives for clean energy and electric vehicles, a Civilian Climate Corps program for young people and energy-efficient building weatherization and electrification projects.

The details of how long the programs will last, and how many billions will be allocated to each program, have not yet been released. But based on how glutted the infrastructure bill was with climate change programs, this agreement may well bring out part two of the Green New Deal. It threatens to massively expand dependence on government social programs and aggressively push for the transformation of the American economy from fossil fuels to “clean energy.”

This is the closest the radical left has gotten to achieving its goal of transforming America’s economy. Ultimately, only 8.9 percent, or $450 billion out of $4.7 trillion, will go to roads, bridges and ports.

Then there is the problem on how to fund this radical agenda. Only $650 billion is pre-approved funds. The rest will need to be financed somehow. One of the ideas by “Fraud-In-Chief”  Biden is to raise corporate income tax from 21 percent to 28 percent.

Other methods include gathering unused covid relief money, using the money generated by the various programs, and asking the Internal Revenue Service to be more strict in enforcing tax laws. However, none of these ideas come close to raising $4 trillion.

In reality it will be financed through higher taxes, or the government will need to print money to fund its own budget.

Woke US Women’s Soccer Team

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on August 19, 2021 by andelino

President Donald Trump says it wasn’t just a lack of scoring that cost the U.S. Women’s soccer team a gold medal at the Tokyo Olympics.

“If our soccer team, headed by a radical group of Leftist Maniacs, wasn’t woke, they would have won the Gold Medal instead of the Bronze,” Trump said in a statement. “Woke means you lose, everything that is woke goes bad, and our soccer team certainly has.”

Conservative group Turning Point USA tweeted a video of Trump making similar comments about the women’s soccer team, which lost 1-0 to Canada in the Olympic semifinals and thus had no chance at the gold.

“Trump released a statement criticizing the Bronze medal-winning USA women’s soccer team.” — Elizabeth Crisp (@elizabethcrisp) August 5, 2021

“Wokeism makes you lose,” Trump said, according to a video of the speech posted to Twitter by Turning Point officials. “The U.S. Women’s soccer team is a very good example of what’s going on. Earlier this week they unexpectedly lost to Sweden 3-0 and Americans were happy about it … you proved that point before I even said it.”

Trump specifically called out lesbian Megan Rapinoe, who once referred to herself a “walking protest” against Trump and his policies. Trump simply referred to her as “the woman with the purple hair,” adding that her politics kept her from playing well.

So the bronze it is for the U.S. women, but as Daily Wire founder Ben Shapiro recently implied, maybe the gold wasn’t their goal anyway. “They’re still the champions at kneeling though, which is the important thing,” Shapiro said.

Having woke athletes that hate America is a great way to drive down viewership.

We Are All Terrorists

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on August 17, 2021 by andelino

According to the Biden administration, you are a terrorist without actually engaging in, causing, or assisting terrorism.

Homeland Security released a warning. NBC News distilled the release into bullet points to hammer home exactly who America’s enemies are – We ARE.

You are a “Potential Terror Threat” if you:

  • Oppose government mandates requiring you to take an experimental drug or wear a mask
  • Question the inconsistencies proven to exist, by forensic audit, in the 2020 election
  • Celebrate religious holidays

The illegitimate” Biden’s administration has decided that people like You aren’t just political opponents, now, you are terrorists!!!

I’d be willing to bet that the doddering old fool, Joey Biden, has not even been told of the crisis and tragedy his administration has caused in Afghanistan, and I’m certain that the recent statements attributed to our failed “Fraud-In-Chief” concerning this tragic event were penned by his staff and not him, because the wording of the statements are not at the stammering and stuttering seventh-grade level that Joey normally uses. His staff is probably just letting him nap and suck on his “Sippy” cup during this trying time, so as not to worry our missing-in-action lunatic. It’s a damned certainty that he’s not providing any leadership.

And how reassuring to American citizens is this Biden caused disaster, when we’re depending on intelligence and good judgment at the presidential level to deal with Iran, Russia, North Korea, China and the blatant lie of climate change? I hope that the fools who voted for Biden are beginning to see the danger that his presence in the Oval Office presents to America and our way of life, because old senile Joey is not ready to take charge of anything, and is not even able to think about difficult issues, let alone make any decisions about them.

The entire, current executive branch of government under Joey Biden should resign en masse and leave our suffering nation in peace. All Joey has accomplished in eight months in the White House is an overrun southwest border, unemployment, inflation, another lockdown in the offing, more masking, more charges of racism at whites, a debt that can never be repaid, suspect deals with Iran, ignoring the pleas of Cubans for liberty and freedom, a melt-down in the Middle East and now the liberation of Afghanistan.

When “Fraud-In-Chief” Joe Biden defended his decision to withdraw all U.S. troops from Afghanistan by a September 11 deadline, the president told reporters on July 8, 2021 that it remained “highly unlikely” the Taliban would take control of the country. 

“The likelihood there’s going to be the Taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country is highly unlikely. The Afghan government and leadership has to come together. They clearly have the capacity to sustain the government in place, there’s not a conclusion that, in fact, they cannot defeat the Taliban.”

“What you had is you had entire brigades breaking through the gates of our Embassy. Six if I’m not mistaken. The Taliban is not the South, the North Vietnamese army. They’re not—they’re not remotely comparable in terms of capability. There’s going to be no circumstance where you’re going to see people being lifted off the roof of a embassy.” Joe Biden, August 5, 2021

Biden’s “illegitimate” administration was stunned by the speed of Taliban’s takeover and the Afghan government’s collapse. The ensuing chaos poses the most serious test of Biden as “Dictator in Chief.” Meanwhile, U.S. officials are increasingly concerned about the potential for the rise in terrorist threats against the U.S. as the situation in Afghanistan devolves, according to a person familiar with the matter who requested anonymity to discuss a sensitive security matter.

Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told senators on a briefing call that U.S. officials are expected to alter their earlier assessments about the pace of terrorist groups reconstituting in Afghanistan, the person said. Based on the evolving situation, officials believe terror groups like al-Qaida may be able to grow much faster than expected.

The spokesman for the Taliban‘s political office told Al-Jazeera Mubasher TV on Sunday that the war is over in Afghanistan and that the type of rule and the form of regime will be clear soon. Spokesman Mohammad Naeem said that no diplomatic body or any of its headquarters was targeted, saying that the group assures everyone it will provide safety for citizens and diplomatic missions.

“We are ready to have a dialogue with all Afghan figures and will guarantee them the necessary protection,” he told the Qatar-based channel. He said the group takes every step responsibly and is keen on having peace with everyone.

Taliban insurgents entered Kabul and President Ashraf Ghani left Afghanistan for Tajikistan saying he wanted to avoid bloodshed, bringing the Islamist militants close to taking over the country two decades after they were overthrown by a U.S. led invasion. Naeem said of Ghani’s escape that it wasn’t taken into account and “even those close to him did not expect it.”

He said the group today is seeing the fruits of its efforts and sacrifices for 20 years. “We have reached what we were seeking, which is the freedom of our country and the independence of our people. We will not allow anyone to use our lands to target anyone, and we do not want to harm others.”

Naeem said the group won’t interfere in the affairs of others and, in return, won’t allow interference in their affairs. “We do not think that foreign forces will repeat their failed experience in Afghanistan once again,” Naeem said, adding that the group is ready to deal with the concerns of the international community through dialogue.

Alexander the Great, 4th century BC
British, 19th century
Soviets, 1980’s
Americans, 21st century

The history of Afghanistan in a nutshell .

Biden operating the most diabolical presidency and Democratic Party probably since slavery.

%d bloggers like this: