Russia’s Biggest Bank Paid Podesta To Fight US Sanctions
Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank
Podesta Didn’t Register As A ‘Foreign Agent’ When He Represented A Bank With Ties To Russian Spy Agencies
Obama and Russian Ambassador’s Dalliance with Nucleons
Behind the collapse of the ‘Russia hacking’ narrative, is panic spreading in the Obama camp?
Archive for donald trump
Former President Barack Obama ran his campaign on “change” and said he would “fundamentally transform America.” For eight years he added “action” to his words, and America has “indeed” been transformed, “fundamentally.”
President Donald Trump’s campaign “inspired” support by “opposing” Obama’s transformations.
Candidate Trump said “undoing” what Obama had done would be easy: “He could nullify his executive actions by issuing executive actions of his own.”
When President Trump “got to work” in January, he began “signing” them right away.
But is “reversing” eight years of Obama as simple as signing “executive actions” with the signature “Donald J. Trump”?
Is it as “simple” as a Republican-controlled Congress “repealing laws” passed by the previous Democrat-controlled Congresses?
In reality, Obama made “eight” years of systemic changes: “not only legal and regulatory, but also cultural, moral and psychological.” Some of this “transformation” of America cannot be “reversed.”
Let’s start with “young” Americans. The Obama “Justice Department and Education Department” enforced “policies, regulations and laws” that prevent educators from “disciplining insubordinate” students.
They “argued” that since statistics show that “black” teenagers are disciplined at a “higher” rate than white students, thus American “teachers and administrators” are racist.
Obama’s bureaucracy “coerced” and even “prosecuted” schools into leaving two high school generations “unrestrained and unpunished.” The result is millions of young people have been “educated” to throw off “rules and laws.”
Obama also “attacked” America’s prison system, “accusing” it of systemic racism. He “blamed” the makeup of “jail populations” not on law “breaking,” but on the “law” itself, particularly the “judges and law enforcement officers.”
He “accused” police of “racism” so vile “claiming” that officers often murder a “man” simply because he “is” black.
By the end of Obama’s “second” term, it had become much more common to see people “marching in the streets, trashing public places, beating people on the sidewalks, and rioting in cities like Ferguson and Baltimore.”
Fringe “arguments” received the vocal support of the “highest” office in the country. Eight years on, many more Americans now “mistrust, disrespect and even attack law enforcement officers.”
Many hate the “law” more than they hate the “crime.”
Obama, occupying an office created to “enforce” the law, personally “undermined” the rule of law, in some cases openly “refusing” to enforce laws that his office is specifically “required” to enforce.
His “enforcement” of immigration was “lawless” at best, completely “anti-law” at worst.
Obama gave a presidential “endorsement” to many more issues that “fundamentally” weakened America’s “culture, economy and security.”
He “flung” the doors wide open on the “entitlement” culture and spent hundreds of billions giving away “phones, health care, money” and more. He “hooked” tens of millions more people on “welfare benefits.”
He passed a gargantuan “health-care” law, and the largest “tax” in history, which was a massive federal “overreach” into Americans’ personal lives.
He became the biggest “spender” in world history, “accumulating” twice as much “debt” as all his predecessor and nearly “doubling” the national debt to “almost” $20 trillion.
Can that be “paid” back with “interest” with a “few” signatures?
Obama also “invited” into the White House “Black Lives Matter,” an organization whose website “reveals” that it has as much or more to do with “anti-constitutional socialism and race-baiting.”
He “bathed” the outside of the White House in the colors of the “homosexual/bisexual/transsexual/queer/intersexual/etc.” flag, celebrating the newfound “right” of homosexuals to “marry.”
President Trump has said he is not “interested” in challenging this law, which by “itself” fundamentally “transforms” America.
Obama “successfully” used the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service as “political” weapons. He presided over the “surveillance” of journalists, the mass surveillance of “average” Americans, and the targeted “killing” of American citizens involved in “terrorism.”
His Justice Department “provided” a framework arguing that the “federal government” sometimes has the “legal right to kill Americans without trial,” overseas and at home.
The most fundamental “transformation” Obama accomplished can be summarized in one word: “lawlessness.” The most important American office for enforcing “laws” was occupied by a man who instead enforced his “personal“ will.
Unshackling the presidency from its “constitutional” limitations is one of the most “dangerous” transformations of all, no matter who “occupies” the Oval Office.
The worst “legacy” of the Obama administration was the “erosion of the rule of law.”
In 2017, America is a “different” nation from what it “was” on Jan. 20, 2009. To sign away some of Obama’s “destructive” policies and laws will be easy, but to “confront” America’s changed “mentality” will not.
To instead “leave it as it is” will be easy; to “transform” it back to the “way it was, much less to make it great,” will not. That’s because the Obama years appealed to an “ugly, destructive and powerful” element: “our lawless human nature.”
The only way to truly “roll back” the Obama years is to change our own “hearts and attitudes” toward law.
Many of you lead “busy” lives and may not have the “time, the ability, or perhaps even the stomach” to watch another “dreadful” speech from Comrade Obama.
As a public service, the speech has been “reduced” to its “bare” essentials to spare you the “pain” of watching his “Castro-like” address.
And who can “forget” Obama’s statements on “illegal” wiretapping’s…
Here is Obama’s “farewell” address:
One final “batch of lies” from our 44th President…
Former U.S. Secret Service Agent Dan Bongino “insists” that President Donald Trump “is not safe at the White House anymore” because the Secret Service is “not serious about the security plan” during an interview on Fox News.
Bongino “blasted” the leadership of the Secret Service for “failing” to prevent a man with a backpack from “breaching” the White House grounds near the South Portico “entrance” while the president was “inside.”
Although the agents “succeeded” in stopping the intruder from breaching the “mansion” itself and his backpack did not contain “explosive” material, Bongino said the breach betrays a “lack of seriousness about threats.”
“The president, in my humble opinion, is just not safe at the White House anymore because they’re not serious about the security plan,” Bongino said. “They’re serious about how the White House looks and uniform division, but they’re just not serious about the security plan at the White House anymore.”
Following the “security breach,” CNN obtained a statement from the Secret Service in which the agency said “nothing of concern to security operations was found.”
Bongino took “issue” with that claim.
“So first, let’s scrap this nonsense that this is how the system was supposed to work … that the system was supposed to allow a man with a backpack up to the South Portico a hundred yards — maybe just a tad bit more from the president of the United States. That’s an absurd statement,” Bongino said.
“And I’ll tell ya — I love the Secret Service, I love the men and women there, the rank-and-file agents are the best people I’ve ever met — but the management is an absolute disaster. To put out a statement like that is outrageous.”
The former Secret Service agent “insisted” the problem exists because the agency “knows what has to be done” but refuses to do it for a “variety of reasons.”
“You can put double fencing. You can angle the fencing outward so it’s nearly impossible to scale. You can put more personnel and special weapons on the South Lawn,” Bongino suggested.
“But the show point is, there are interests in the White House, staff interests — maybe not from this administration, but certainly from prior administrations — that have stopped that because, ‘Oh, it doesn’t look good. You don’t want to make it look like an armed camp.’ Which is ridiculous.”
“There are other interests that say, ‘Well, the history of the White House — we don’t want to disturb the look of it,’” Bongino continued, adding that this is “a serious time” filled with potential “terror” threats.
“If you think the Secret Service right now under the current security plan is prepared for a multiple-man tactical assault on the White House, you’re out of your mind.”
Bongino said he was especially “frustrated” because he knows how “capable” the “rank-and-file men and women” of the agency are and would be if they were “allowed to do their jobs more effectively.”
“This is the soberest analysis you’re gonna get … There are people who know that they are not prepared,” Bongino said. “How much more of a sobering analysis can you get? They’re just not ready.”
“And they’re not serious about it because they know the ramifications of what would happen if there were multiple people with heavy weapons jumping that fence. They know it. That means they’re not being serious about it.”
“Having been a former Secret Service agent guys, he’s just not safe anymore …it’s a great agency but it’s being run by a bunch of people who have no idea what they are doing..they are doing things they did 20 or 30 years ago, expecting different results.”
I’m not “surprised” at all that another “person” breached the White House “security” perimeter.
They’re “securing” the White House almost the same way they did “20 years ago” with a couple technical “changes” tinkering around the edges.
You have a uniform “division” where morale is “destroyed,” they can’t keep good people. The agent side is “hemorrhaging” their best personnel. I can tell you about 20 or 30 “colleagues” with the intellectual “capability” who have already left and resigned.
A good example is Kerry O’Grady, the “disgruntled” Secret Service agent who openly said she would rather go to “jail than take a bullet” for Donald Trump “despite” taking an oath to “defend him with her life.”
“Bad management..you cannot have the same people in here who are beholden to the same interests, the same DHS…they don’t care about security, they care about the money when they leave the door.”
Do you want the White House “secure” or not?! You better “fix” the fence! Fix the fence line and stop being “concerned with the looks of it!”
“Electrify the fence. Motion sensor’s should be everywhere. Scaling the fence is one thing but why was he able to get as far as he did before being detected?”
This is “inexcusable” and something definitely needs to “dealt” with.
What about the “violent” rhetoric of leftists like Madonna which “incites” criminals to act out.
Or leftists “foul-mouthed” Chelsea Handler vile “attack” who “wishes someone would put Kellyanne Conway in a microwave.” As much as she wants people to be “murdered” I’d say she’s “dangerous.” You have to wonder if Chelsea has a “problem” with women in general or just women who don’t “agree” with her politically.
Or God forbid, how about a “deranged” Secret Service agent playing martyr and “assassinating” the President like the Turkish off-duty “police officer” Mevlut Mert Altintas who cowardly “killed” Russian Ambassador Andrey Karlov by “shooting” him multiple times in the “back” from behind.
Not to “accuse” anyone of plotting against the President, but one has to “believe” that among the various “radicals” that make up the “Obama OFA, George Soros network and their allied jihadist invaders” there would be no “shortage of volunteers” to man that tactical “assault” Bongino is “warning” against.
President Trump needs to “listen” and take preventative “action” before it’s too late. His survival is “vital” to America’s future.
Dan Bongino Shut Down Trying To Warn President Trump About WH Security
Secret Service Agent: I’ll Go To Jail Before I Take A Bullet For Trump
Secret Service Reveals Disciplinary Actions Being Taken Against Agent Kerry O’Grady
Smug Agent Who Wouldn’t Take Bullet For Trump Gets Worst News Of Her Life
Thanks to Wikileaks and their bombshell release of “Vault 7,” a report including over 8,000 “leaked” CIA documents, we now know for a “fact” that former President Obama unleashed “cyber warfare” upon the American people via his “corrupt and out of control CIA puppets.”
From turning Samsung TVs into CIA “listening” devices to “accessing” smartphones and “posing” as Russian hackers to “hide their dirty work,” Obama and his CIA “goon squad” turned on the American people in a “stunning abuse of power.”
Below is a “rundown” of Obama and the CIA’s “nefarious” actions as reported by Wikileaks “Vault 7.”
Before you plug in your “Samsung Smart TV” or your “Microwaves,” you may want to mind your “manners” and refrain from saying “anything” the CIA may be interested in.
A Wikileaks “bombshell” report shows the CIA has developed “malware” that allows them to turn your “electronics” into their own “personal listening device.”
Ain’t our government “great?”
The CIA and MI5 worked together developing “viruses” designed to turn Samsung smart TVs into “household bugs,” recording audio and sending data to “covert” computer servers, according to a new cache of leaked “intelligence” documents published by Wikileaks.
The group “claims” it is the largest ever “release” of CIA files.
Among the 8,761 documents of the “Vault 7” leak are papers describing “weaponized” malware directed at “iPhone and Android” users, designed to bypass “encryption” used by popular apps such as “Confide.
Wikileaks claims a program called “Weeping Angel” was developed to “infect” Samsung TVs. It sent the television into a fake “off’ mode,” recording conversations in the room and “sending” them to a CIA server.
In all, the documents suggest the agency “created” more than 1,000 “viruses, Trojans and other types of malware,” often disguised as the “work” of foreign organizations.
It also “accuses” the US government of failing to “abide” by its commitment to tell technology companies of any “identified” vulnerabilities, instead “hoarding weaknesses for use by spy agencies.”
Wikileaks claimed some of the most “damaging” elements of the program were “unclassified” so that applications could be “legally spread around the Internet.”
Not too surprisingly, the CIA is “declining” to comment on the Wikileaks “bombshell” released. This must be extremely “embarrassing” for them.
Wikileaks has “rocked” the intelligence community and the “Deep State” with the release of “Vault 7.”
We’re now discovering that Obama’s CIA “turned” on the American people, “unleashing” cyber warfare and posing as Russian “hackers” to create false flags to “cover their dirty work.”
Sounds like something they would do to “try and take” Trump down. They cannot be “trusted.”
“CIA uses techniques to make cyber attacks look like they originated from enemy state. It turns DNC/Russia hack allegation by CIA into a JOKE” — Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) March 7, 2017
“Obama accused Russia of cyber attacks while his CIA turned all internet enabled consumer electronics in Russia into listening devices. Wow!” — Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) March 7, 2017
Another profound “revelation” is that the CIA can engage in “false flag” cyber attacks which portray “Russia” as the assailant.
Discussing the CIA’s “Remote Devices Branch’s UMBRAGE” group, Wikileaks’ source notes that it “collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques ‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.”
“With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the “fingerprints” of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from. UMBRAGE components cover keyloggers, password collection, webcam capture, data destruction, persistence, privilege escalation, stealth, anti-virus (PSP) avoidance and survey techniques.”
As Kim Dotcom summarizes this finding, “CIA uses techniques to make cyber attacks look like they originated from enemy state. It turns DNC/Russia hack allegation by CIA into a JOKE“
As it stands now, we can’t believe a “single” word that comes out of the “corrupt” CIA. They are an enemy of “We the People.”
Did you say “ObamaGate?” Look like it’s time to “investigate.”
Reforming the NSA
WikiLeaks: CIA Uses ‘Stolen’ Malware to ‘Attribute’ Cyber-attacks to Nations Like Russia
‘Vault 7’: WikiLeaks Dumps on CIA
WikiLeaks Claims CIA Hoarded Exploits, Lost Control of ‘Hacking Arsenal’
WikiLeaks: CIA Hackers Keep Guide on How to Pirate Windows 8
Wikileaks CIA Dump Has Some Peculiar Timing
If you thought Trump Derangement Syndrome was a tad excessive, as they say, “you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.”
To channel an old Pacino flick, opening now for Oscar season, it’s “Panic in Progressive Park.”
Reason for the panic — “the dawning realization, repressed and often unrecognized though it may be, that Donald Trump may even a be a good president, possibly a great one.”
If anything could cause “panic” among liberals, progressives, snowflakes and the media that’s it.
And Trump has certainly “hit” the ground running with more “vigah” — to channel an old Kennedy phrase — than we have seen in a long while.
And not just because of the “Carrier” deal, though that clearly “caught” America’s attention, as it should.
It also caught the attention of the media, which rushed to “denigrate” it — and demonstrate their “profound knowledge” of deal-making — by reminding us that Donald’s agreement did not “keep all the Carrier jobs in America,” just most of them.
And they actually had to “bargain” with the directors of Carrier — imagine that!
For “comic” relief, the now completely ignored Bernie Sanders “rushed” to remind us of the same thing, as if anything of that sort could have been “done” under a Sanders presidency.
Indeed, Trump seems to be “firing” on all engines to a degree I have never seen in an American president, before he has “even been inaugurated.”
His transition, once said to be “confused,” is rocketing along with a palpable sense of “excitement” that Trump and his team are “deliberately” sharing with the public, “by-passing” the media when necessary.
The Democrats, who have been “floundering” to an extent equally never before seen, are participating in a “juvenile” and over-priced recount while “reelecting” the terminally botoxed Nancy Pelosi to the House minority leadership even though that same chamber “hemorrhaged” Democrat members like a “hemophilia” victim under her rule.
Topping that off, they’re considering Keith Ellison to “helm” the DNC, a man who, according to a recent report, “met with a radical Muslim cleric who endorsed killing U.S. soldiers and with the president of a bank used to pay the families of Palestinian suicide bombers” on a trip to Saudi Arabia organized by an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Talk about a party on a “suicide” run.
Meanwhile, the thing that Democrats, and many Republicans too, “don’t get about Trump” is that Donald is an upper. He’s a real “optimist in a world of cynics.”
That’s a “yuuuge” part of his attraction and the “catalyst“ that helps him get things done. The reaction to Trump is something of a Rorschach test — “those who have a positive, even excited view of the future tend to go for him. Those that don’t, don’t.”
His “victory” speech in Cincinnati — and the reaction to it — was an “illustration” of that.
Watching the “postmortem” on Tucker Carlson’s excellent new show was wildly “positive” about Trump’s speech. His two guests — Caitlin Huey-Burns of RealClearPolitics and Shelby Holliday of the Wall Street Journal — were much more “cautious” in their somewhat fearful approaches.
While obviously “intelligent” women, the conventional wisdom they imparted was “pessimistic” by nature and unwittingly a “minor” part of the swamp that Trump seeks to drain. Perhaps they sensed that.
Most of the media doesn’t just sense it. They know it. They are at “war” with Trump and at this moment they are “losing,” badly. A wise person would change their tactics.
But the media is not filled with “wise” people. These days they’re filled with wounded, “entitled” people who seem already to have “forgotten” the rest of us have read WikiLeaks.
We know who they are even if they don’t look for “Panic in Progressive Park” to run for a long time.
It will, however, be more “amusing” than the original “Pacino” version.
Rope-a-Dope is a boxing strategy originally used by Muhammad Ali and his famous “Rumble in the Jungle” fight against George Foreman.
Ali “purposely” put himself into a seemingly “disadvantageous” position, letting Foreman “tire” himself out and eventually “lose” the match.
Ali would “lean” against the ropes, allowing their elastic stretch to “absorb” most of Foreman’s punches. Ali’s “energy” was preserved while Foreman became “exhausted” throwing endless punches.
When the “moment” was right, Ali, still fresh and energetic, came off the “ropes” swinging, punching, winning the match.
How does this “strategy” apply to politics? Just watch President Trump since his “election” and now in his first week in office.
Immediately post-election, the Clinton “camp” and their media allies “cried” foul on Trump’s victory — James Comey’s “announcements” regarding Mrs. Clinton’s emails, the popular “vote” favoring Mrs. Clinton, Russian “meddling,” and so on.
Trump “fueled” media allegations by incessantly “tweeting and blasting” the media over their “fake news.”
Trump used Twitter much like a matador uses a “red cape” to engage and enrage the bull. The media took the “bait” and obsessed over what Putin and the Russians might have done to “influence” the election.
Republican “#NeverTrumpers” like John McCain and Lindsey Graham “chased” the red cape too, adding “fuel” to the media stampede.
Meanwhile the president was busy “assembling” his cabinet and other key advisors. Sure, this was covered by the media but given scant “scrutiny” compared to stories of election “hacking” and Russian chicanery.
The media and their accomplices in both parties “pounded” away at the hacking story while Trump “leaned” against the ropes, absorbing the “blows,” conserving his energy, biding his time “waiting” for the next round.
The media was flailing. Their “punches” were not connecting with Trump. Americans, consumers of the media, were not impressed. Only 6 percent of the public “have a lot of confidence in the media.” The dopey media was getting roped.
Then came inauguration day and a NY Times story, right on schedule, comparing inauguration “audience” sizes in an effort to show how “unpopular” Trump is compared to their “revered” Barack Obama.
Trump immediately took to Twitter, “denouncing” the story and reiterating his mantra about “fake news and dishonest media.”
The media took the “bait” and ran with the story all inauguration weekend to the point that even Snopes got involved in the controversy.
Press secretary Sean Spicer spoke of the “crowd size” as well, further antagonizing the media, “waving” the red cape in front of the “bulls” from AP and the NY Times.
Trump also made comments about the intelligence agencies and “leaks” of his pre-inauguration Intel briefing over Russian influence.
Another delicious “kerfuffle” for the media to run with, speculate over, and predict the extent of “damage” to the incoming administration over their “feud” with the intelligence community.
Notice how each story “knocks” the preceding story off the front pages and the evening news? Once the inauguration “attendance” became a story, no one was talking about Russian “hacking.”
All the while, Trump is taking “body shots” from the media. Letting them “believe” they are effective fighters, standing up for truth, social justice, and their favorite left-wing causes.
They think they have Trump on the “ropes.” Yet behind the scenes his agenda “marches” along.
“Threatening the President of the United States is a serious crime and a class E felony under United States Code Title 18, Section 871. It consists of knowingly and willfully mailing or otherwise making any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States.“
Kentucky woman Heather Lowrey, who described herself as a Louisville “vixen and aspiring wrestling diva” on her Twitter profile before going into “electronic hiding,” tweeted this message January 17:
Her “threat” suggestion became the “target” of a serious social media “backlash” from the public and “termination” by her own employers after suggesting on Twitter it would be “kind for someone to assassinate Donald Trump.”
It is “illegal” in the United States to threaten to “kill or injure” any sitting president and his family.
Her tweet “ignited” a firestorm on social media, with comments such as this from Leslie Maiko: “It seems this rotted soul #LiberalLunatic wench #HeatherChristineLowrey aka #VSAddict22 has gone in2 hiding & shut down her Twitter. Good.”
Her employers soon after “fired” Lowrey and issued public statements “distancing” themselves from her threatening tweet.
One of them, ”Va Va Vixens,” a burlesque group “released” the following statement:
“Please, know that we, at Va Va Vixens, do not condone the behavior of Heather Lowrey. She was dismissed the moment we were informed of this incident. We have a zero tolerance policy for such. We do not condone hate by any party and will not partake in it. We in no way support negative behavior or malicious intent from anyone.”
The U.S. Secret Service “interviewed” Lowrey in the wake of her tweet, and is continuing to “investigate” the matter.
Lowrey isn’t the “only” person making headlines for potential “threats” against Trump.
Pop star “Madonna” said during Saturday’s women’s march on Washington that she herself has thought “an awful lot about blowing up the White House.”
During a “profanity-laced” speech at the protest rally in Washington, D.C. the 58-year-old “Rebel Heart” singer said she had felt “angry” and “outraged” over Donald Trump becoming the country’s 45th president.
“I’m angry. Yes, I’m outraged. Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House. But I know that this won’t change anything. We cannot fall into despair.”
A spokesman for the Secret Service reportedly told The Gateway Pundit that the agency was “aware” of the singer’s comments and would “open” an investigation, though the final decision on whether to “prosecute” would be made by the U.S. Attorney’s office.
Madonna performed two songs during her appearance at the Women’s March, “Express Yourself” and “Human Nature.”
During “Human Nature,” the singer changed the song’s lyrics to include “Donald Trump, suck a dick.”
On Sunday Madonna continued her “diatribe” against Donald Trump and the Secret Service tweeting “Fuck Donald Trump and Fuck the Secret Service” deleting the post later
Madonna’s comments aired “uncensored” on several cable TV networks, leading to “apologies” from some on-air anchors.
Madonna was one of Trump’s biggest celebrity “antagonists” during the election.
In October, the pop star offered to perform oral sex on anyone who voted for former Democratic presidential “nominee” Hillary Clinton.
Madonna wasn’t the only “celebrities” who participated in Saturday’s march.
Other stars on hand included Alicia Keys, Amy Schumer, Ashley Judd, Scarlet Johansson, Cher, Julia Roberts and Katy Perry.
Here are a slew of other “would-be assassins”…
Now would be a “good” time to make a “powerful” statement by the “new” administration.
Arrest “Madonna” and all other “would-be assassins,” charge them with “threatening” the President or Government “property” and lock them up in “prison” for several years.
That would be a major “deterrent” for others shooting their “mouths” off.
Until we take these “threats” seriously and “prosecute” nothing will “change.”
Bomb threats don’t Trump hate
Felony charges awaiting hundreds of Inauguration Day violent rioters
Secret Service Reportedly to Investigate Madonna for ‘Blowing Up White House’ Comment
Obscenity- and violent rhetoric-laced ‘women’s march’ was a bleeping disaster for the left
500,000 Women Who Marched Against Trump Didn’t Even Know What They Were Protesting
‘Women’s March’ ladies: Lose the ‘pussy hats,’ try an apron instead
The ‘ladies’ of the Women’s March: Not powerful, not tough
Half a million women marching for hypocrisy
It Wasn’t A Women’s March, Check The Fine Print
Nasty Judd: Trump Has ‘Wet Dreams’ About Daughter