Archive for donald trump

What Happened?

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , on September 9, 2017 by andelino

American publishing company “Simon & Schuster” is proud to announce its new book “What Happened” series.

In a statement by a company spokesperson he stated Simon & Schuster is not afraid of “beating” a dead horse.

Our new “What Happened” series will dig deep to “reveal” the already obvious reasons that led to some of history’s most notable “two-time presidential candidate defeat.”

We are “proud” that Hillary Rodham Clinton has agreed to kickoff our “What Happened” series by touring and promoting it across The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.


Fake News Media

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on September 8, 2017 by andelino

Assorted news media figures across CNN, MSNBC and WAPO are hyping a narrative of President Trump lacking “empathy” for those hurt by Hurricane Harvey.

A “lack of empathy” is a feature of sociopathic and psychopathic behavior, dovetailing the narrative of Trump as being “mentally” ill.

News media personalities include Mike Barnicle (of MSNBC), Eddie Glaude (of MSNBC), Mark Leibovich (of The New York Times Magazine) Ari Melber (of MSNBC), Abby Phillips (of CNN ), Ruth Marcus (of The Washington Post), Joan Walsh (of The Nation), and Jeff Zeleny (of CNN).

“He didn’t hug a mom or hold a baby or shake someone’s hand or ask a senior how they were doing. It was really remarkable,” claimed Joan Walsh, “It was typical Donald Trump, without an ounce of empathy.”

Trump was “learning on the job in terms of empathy and in terms of how to react and relate to the individuals here,” surmised CNN’s Jeff Zeleny.

“The human element seemed to be absent,” opined MSNBC’s Eddie Glaude, remarking on Trump’s response to Hurricane Harvey.

“I did not hear Trump speak about the victims of this flood, and I’m wondering… is there something missing here in him?” asked MSNBC’s Mike Barnicle, suggesting a lack of empathy within the president.

On the heels of Donald Trump’s “lack of empathy”, a new trait recently “discovered” in the bowels of the media echo chamber, come these “disturbing” revelations.

They were collected by Mark Dice, who was later joined by “other” media researchers.

I’m sure our “vigilant” comrades will spot more “outrageous” behavior on the part of this president and “post” them on the Internet.

NK H-Bomb Secrets

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on September 7, 2017 by andelino

Nations around the world “panic!”

Speculation of an imminent North Korea “global inferno” mounts as Kim Jong-un inspects his new “doomsday” H-bomb.

Here are exclusive “photos and detailed drawings” of the North Korean dictator’s newest weapon.

The truth is now “revealed” for the first time!

President Trump, on his part, has “discovered” the same secret design “drawing” in Russian.

Do I have to repeat it?

RUSSIAN! As in “Russian hackers” or “Russian collusion” or “Russian hand puppet.”

The link is clear; only the “blind or the brainwashed” cannot connect the dots here.

Can we talk about “Trump-North Korea” collusion now?

How long can the people be silent?

And now the “plot” thickens!

Remember, Kim Jong-un said “I will insinkerate America!” 

False Preachers

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on September 6, 2017 by andelino

Protests has been suffering of late. Several of our more religious comrades have been conscripted into the “Heavenly Screeners and Bouncers Group.” This is a noble task and worthwhile in every respect.

But these vacancies must be filled. The application process is now open for “Race Baiters, Color Extortionists and Shameless Self Promoters.” We must fill these vacancies.

Civil Rights activist Rev. Jesse Jackson said this week that the Electoral College “must come down” and warned that President Trump may have trouble making it into “Heaven” because of his views on immigrants.

Jackson said that Trump demands people “speak English, be qualified and have a job skill,” the Daily Wire reported.

“Jesus would not qualify to come in Trump’s country, he would not qualify to get into Jesus’ kingdom,” Jackson said, going on to quote the Book of Matthew’s passage about helping the underprivileged.

He also called for reminders of the Confederacy to be “removed” from public view, adding that “the statues must come down.”

“The electoral college must come down,” Jackson added, saying it “interferes” with the ability for one “man to have one vote” in a democracy.

In the late 1990s, Jackson however “praised” then-businessman Donald Trump on “multiple” occasions.

As this smuggled YouTube video proves, Joel Osteen is completely “unworthy” to fill any position in the “Heavenly Screeners and Bouncers Group” openings.

Thank you in advance, Jesse and Joel. We appreciate your stepping up in our time of need.

Summer Sabbatical

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , on July 12, 2017 by andelino

Whether you are a reader of this blog, signed up somewhere along the path or are a relatively new recruit we have become a family of kindred souls committed to staying the course and guide this ship of state away from the shoals. 

I need to take a bit of a break. This break becomes mandatory as the chores don’t do themselves around here, the half-done projects do not resolve on their own and the new maintenance projects seem to multiply like rabbits.

So the long and short of it is I need to spend less time blogging and more time maintaining.

I’m not shuttering the shop, just cutting back on posting until early September in order to tend to other business.

And I won’t be checking in regularly as I normally do.

In the meantime, while Trump continues to clean up the swamp,  I will be cleaning up and fixing up everything that’s falling apart closer to home.

NATO Article V

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on July 8, 2017 by andelino

President Donald Trump says the U.S. is “committed” to Article 5 of the “NATO” charter, which “requires” each member of the “alliance” to come to the “defense” of any other.

He made the “remarks” from the White House Rose Garden during a joint “news” conference with the president of Romania.

“Certainly we are there to protect, that’s one of the reasons I want people to make sure we have a very, very strong force by paying the kind of money necessary to have that force.”

Trump has been “critical” of NATO and hinted at times to “abandon” NATO if members did not meet a “defense” spending benchmark of “two percent of GDP” that they collectively “agree” on.

“Even 2 percent of GDP is insufficient … 2 percent is the bare minimum for confronting today’s very real and very viscous threats,” Trump said.

Currently, only “five” of the alliance’s “28 members” have met the “two percent” goal.

European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said European Union members must “increase” defense expenditure in “protecting” the bloc.

Everyone knows about Article V, right? It is repeated “ad infinitum” in press releases and news stories about NATO. “An attack on one member state is an attack on all.”

The “implication” here is if, say, Russia overtly “attacked” even one of the “tiny” Baltic or other far off “front-line” states, the U.S. would “respond” as if Florida was “invaded,” and we’d be in a no-nonsense “war” with the Great “Bear” of the East.

I don’t think so. Like so many things in life, the “actual” understanding of Article V “requires” drilling down deeper into the “details” of the treaty.

Here is the “relevant” part of Article V:

Bruce Fein, in the Washington Times, has “dissected” this more.

He notes that “Article 11” of the NATO treaty “clarifies” that any use of “armed force” by NATO parties in carrying out “Article V” must be in accord with their respective “constitutional” processes.

“For the United States, that means Congress must enact a declaration of war before the President may employ the armed forces to defend a NATO  Member from external aggression.  Article 5 is not and could not be made to be self-executing— even by amending NATO.  The United States Supreme Court held in Reid v. Covert (1956) that treaties are subordinate to the Constitution.  The Declare War Clause may not be circumvented by any treaty whatsoever.”

This means that taken as a “whole and contrary” to the popular understanding, the NATO “treaty” does not require the U.S. to “automatically” commence war if a member country is “attacked.”

Congressional approval — “both Senate the House of Representatives” — would be needed.

To which I’ll add that the “verbiage” in Article V itself gives tremendous “wiggle room” to avoid being dragged into a “full-fledged” war.

To repeat Article V, it says NATO member states “will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.”

The action “deemed necessary” can be almost anything and is something that is left up to the “discretion” of each member state. And “will assist” should not be construed to mean that the U.S. will carry the “bulk of the burden” of the military action as was done in “WWII and the Cold War.”

Consider this for example. The“front line” NATO states are in Europe. Why then doesn’t the “wealthy” European powerhouses of Germany and France take the lead in “defending” them by stationing a serious “military presence” of their own there instead of expecting “distant” America to do it?

So that brings us to “how” the NATO treaty is likely to be “interpreted.”

It should be “obvious” that it makes a world of difference if Donald Trump, Rand Paul, or Ted Cruz is president as“opposed” to a globalist in the mold of John McCain, Hillary Clinton or any of the rest of the “run-of-the-mill” establishment politicians eyeing the high office.

It is likely that the former group would be “constrained” in the call to war and would likely “comply” with the Constitution by seeking a formal “congressional declaration.”

As for Sen. McCain and his fellow “globalists,” many of them can be expected to “jump” at any pretext to “march off” to go to war.

To many observers, it seems that the “likelihood” of Russia commencing outright “hostilities” in Europe is extremely “low,” the Ukraine notwithstanding.

So maybe it’s best to follow the “old” adage that the best time to “fix a leaky roof” is not when it’s “raining” but when the sun is “shining.”

This means we should have a “national” discussion clarifying our “commitment” to NATO.

Both as a “candidate and now as president,” Donald Trump has started the “ball rolling.” But more needs to follow.

For example, some of the “questions” for the American people to “decide” on includes:

Is it really in America’s interest to continue to carry over 70 percent of the financial burden of NATO?

Is our national security truly enhanced by promising our full military support to defend states like Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Lithuania, Montenegro and the like?

Are we really serious about defending Islamic Turkey and if so, why?

Is it wise to station U.S. troops in front line NATO states whose presence serve more as a trip wire than anything else?

Many “benefits” would flow if questions like there were “openly” debated about NATO.

First, the American public would be “enlightened” as to just what the post-Cold War “foreign affairs” establishment wants “to commit us” to in Europe.

Second, “airing” the issue can only help constrain the “overreaching” ambitions of the pro-NATO coalition, especially as it pertains to “Article V.”

Also, it would soon “dawn” on the Europeans that America’s commitment to “defend” them is not “unlimited” as they now “imagine” it to be.

Rather, the U.S. will “assist” Europe in fighting off “aggression” but we will not “do it for them.”

All this would be “healthy” developments.

Trump believes in NATO’s Article 5
Trump publicly commits to NATO mutual-defense provision
Are We Near the End of NATO?

Guns for Me, Not for Thee

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on June 29, 2017 by andelino


Not too long ago, Democrat Charlie Rangel said members of Congress “deserve and need” people with firearms protecting them in the U.S. Capitol building, but he does not want “law-abiding residents” in his own district to be armed for “self-protection.”

Rangel made this “distinction” when he spoke about New York Police Department’s gun permitting bribery scandal.

According to reports, four NYPD officials were arrested for accepting “trips, expensive gifts and prostitutes” from two Brooklyn men in exchange for “police escorts, privileged access and gun licenses,” federal prosecutors charged.

When asked about his “thoughts” on the difficulty of getting a “concealed carry permit” in New York City and how “rare” it is for such permits to be issued by the NYPD, Rangel replied, “I’m glad to hear you say that very few people get it.”

“We don’t need that many guns. I didn’t know that briberies were involved in getting a gun, and that is wrong, but overall, if it is difficult to get a concealed weapon permit, I’m glad to hear that.”

Like Maryland, California, and the District of Columbia, New York’s firearm permitting approval “requires” that applicants must provide “good cause” to carry a firearm.

The laws surrounding New York City’s firearm issuing authority have been “criticized” in the past for favoring retired police officers or those with the “right connections” within the police department to get a concealed carry permit.

The 37,000 issued licensees include prominent “business leaders, elected officials, journalists, judges and attorneys.”

What about Rangel’s own “constituents” in his Harlem district? Should “law-abiding” residents who live there have “concealed carry permits” too?

I wouldn’t want them to have it. I know what you’re trying to say. Corruption is corruption, and it’s bad. Law-abiding citizens just shouldn’t have to carry a gun. You’re not gonna push me in that direction,” he said, standing just five feet from a “Capitol Police” officer, in the House Speaker’s Lobby.

When noted to Rangel that he and other members of Congress are “protected” by armed members of the “U.S. Capitol Police,” Rangel laughingly insisted “Well that’s a little different. I think we deserve. I think we need to be protected down here.”

Fast forward, in a stunning development that “interrupted” the coverage of the Congressional Democrat’s “Hey Hey, Ho Ho, Civil Right’s have got to go” PR stunt, celebrities and politicians have decided to forgo “armed” protection.

In a “hastily” announced press conference, held simultaneously in “Hollywood and Washington DC,” media spokespersons for the new “HypocritesNoMore” (HNM) organization, Charlie Rangel read off a “long list” of celebrities and the nation’s socialist left who “no longer want to be protected by guns” as demonstrated by their ”sit-in protest” on the House floor against Civil Rights.

During the “HypocritesNoMore” conference Rangel “revealed” that they will now take the same “risk” as ordinary people who don’t have a “security force” to protect them 24/7/365.

Reporters were “stunned” for words with the brutal honesty of “Why should we be protected while we strive to deny Civil Rights to everyone else?”

Conversely when pro-Civil Rights “advocates” were asked by the media if they were going to “disarm” as well their response was that they in fact “support” the people’s common sense “Civil Right” of armed self defense and thus were in no way “hypocritical” in having armed security.

In what has become the “iconic” and widely shared imagery of the “HypocritesNoMore” movement,  each member of the organization has pledged to be “gun-free and defenseless” and to post a sign outside their “residences” that reads:

We are entirely peaceful and defenseless.
We have disarmed our bodyguards and security forces.
Our residences will no longer be protected by walls.
We believe in offering love and hugs to everyone.
Which will bring peace and harmony to the world.

Charlie Range further pointed out that “contrary” to leftist dogmatic beliefs, criminals and Islamic terrorists “do not abide the law.”

Many of the media representatives were “stunned” by this astounding revelation.

After several seconds of “dazed” silence, one reporter asked, “Does this mean that ALL those gun laws have NO EFFECT on criminals and Islamic terrorists?”

Rangel responded, “one only has to look at Democratic bastions with high crime and heavy people control to witness this reality of common sense and basic logic.”

Another extraordinary “gun grab” claim was made by Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe.

Did you knew we were losing 93,000 million Americans a day due to gun violence?

He used a press “briefing” on the shooting of U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise and four “other” Republicans as a means to bash “gun violence.”

When asked what more can be done to “curb” violence, McAuliffe said, “I have long advocated that there are too many guns on the street. We lose 93 million Americans a day to gun violence.”

Democrat Terry McAuliffe has an “impeccable” reputation,  especially one with such“close ties” to the “Clinton Crime Family Syndicate.”

I wouldn’t “question” his figures. The entire U.S. population will be “wiped” out in about 4 days as can be “seen” in a typical American “shooting” of “49 people” in just under one and half minutes. On average that adds up to “93 million a day.”

Because of this sensational “uptick” in violence, we all be “dead” by the end of the week. Please, say your “prayers,” and tell your loved one’s “one last time” how much they meant to you.

No wonder President Trump doesn’t believe in “Climate Change.” Why should we “worry” about a one-degree “temperature” rise in 100 years when we are long “dead” by then?

According to the “HypocritesNoMore” organization celebrity “bodyguards and security forces” will from now on carry “guitars, flowers, candles, and stuffed animals.”

If a celebrity or politician is “attacked/murdered,” they will be able to “immediately” begin building a “shrine” and enlist mourners in singing John Lennon’s “Imagine.”

Media personnel will be “outfitted” with HD and 3D video cameras.  It is critical that “mourners” be seen instantly on all major newscasts “sobbing and wiping” away tears for at least 48 hours.

That way “viewers” can feel like they’re really there and “share” in the sorrow to bring “peace and harmony” to the world.

It’s been “proven” in England, Germany, France and many other “nations” that this is much more effective in “stopping” violence than carrying “guns for self-defense.”

Rangel: No Guns For Law-Abiding Constituents But I ‘Deserve–Need’ Police Protection
Democrat Rangel charged with 13 ethics violations
Hillary Clinton Campaigns With Scandal Plagued ‘Friend’ Charlie Rangel In Harlem
Rep. Charles Rangel: Politicians Get Guns for Protection, But Americans Should Be Unarmed
Hollywood’s Hypocritical Love-Hate Relationship With Guns
Top Seven Anti-Gun Hypocrites
Gun control for thee, not for me

%d bloggers like this: