Archive for democrats

Immigrant Slaves

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on March 20, 2017 by andelino

Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson was roundly “criticized” by celebrities like Samuel Jackson, Leslie Jones and Whoopi Goldberg after he referred to the “slaves” from Africa as “immigrants” with dreams and hopes for their children’s futures.

President Barack Obama used “similar” language to include African-Americans “descended” from slaves among the immigrants who “helped” shape America.

Here is Obama in 2015:

“Certainly, it wasn’t easy for those of African heritage who had not come here voluntarily and yet in their own way were immigrants themselves. There was discrimination and hardship and poverty. But, like you, they no doubt found inspiration in all those who had come before them. And they were able to muster faith that, here in America, they might build a better life and give their children something more.”

Here is Carson in 2017:

“That’s what America is about, a land of dreams and opportunity. There were other immigrants who came here in the bottom of slave ships, worked even longer, even harder for less. But they too had a dream that one day their sons, daughters, grandsons, granddaughters, great-grandsons, great-granddaughters, might pursue prosperity and happiness in this land.”

Whoopi Goldberg promptly “blasted” Ben Carson after he compared “slaves to immigrants.”

During “The View” the host asked how it was that the HUD secretary “missed” that slaves did not come to America “voluntarily.”

“Maybe we need to get him a history book,” Goldberg insinuated. “I mean were the slaves really thinking about the American dream? No, because they were trying to understand, ‘what the hell just happened?’”

“When people immigrate they come with the idea that they’re going someplace for a better life. That’s why people immigrate to America every day. It’s voluntary, but the slaves…we were not voluntary. We looked up and one minute we thought ‘hey what an amazing land.’ And the next thing we knew we were like ‘uh-huh, what just happened?’”

“How does he miss what slavery is,” Goldberg exclaimed. “How does he miss that no slave came to this country willingly? I’m sorry, Ben, watch ‘Roots.’”

Carson has since “clarified” his remarks on Facebook and said that the “slave narrative and immigrant narrative” are different experiences.

“I’m proud of the courage and perseverance of Black Americans and their incomprehensible struggle from slavery to freedom,” Carson wrote.

“I’m proud that our ancestors overcame the evil and repression that we know as slavery. The slave narrative and immigrant narrative are two entirely different experiences. Slaves were ripped from their families and their homes and forced against their will after being sold into slavery by slave traders. The Immigrants made the choice to come to America. They saw this country as a land of opportunity. In contrast, slaves were forced here against their will and lost all their opportunities.”

It is “safe” to say that Carson, the “renowned” neurosurgeon, professor and director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins, and 4 time best-selling “author,” fully understands the “nature and history” of slavery in America, and used the word “Immigrants” by choice, to illuminate the fact, that “despite” slavery, African Americans are a part of this “Nation of Immigrants. “

He chose that word because it suggests “inclusion” not division, “self determination” and not victim hood. But If the Dems weren’t being arrogant, divisive, nitpicking “obstructionist” they’d have no purpose in life.

Boycott hateful, “racist” Samuel Jackson, Whoopi Goldberg and Leslie Jones who “built” their Tinseltown careers being the “go to” for angry “black man” with the “foulest” mouth on earth.

Carson is a “great” example of how a person, despite “obstacles,” with initiative, drive and focus, can become anything they “desire” in this great country.

The opportunities for “success” are there for anyone to take “advantage” of, even someone who grew up in “poverty” in Detroit. Since Carson does not see “himself” as a victim, and never plays the “victim” card, the Dems “reject” him.

They don’t like success “stories” from Black conservatives that “started” with nothing. I think his “compassion, intelligence and personal history” will lead him to great “success” in his new position.

Liberal “tolerance” stops at the “democratic” party door. If you are outside of their “orthodoxy” then liberals have “free” reign to show their “racist, sexist, anti-Semite, xenophobic” self. It is in their “nature.”

They are filled with “hatred” for those that do not “believe” as they do, kind of like “Muslims” thinking everyone else is an “infidel.” Democrats need suppressed “victims.”

The “Libtard” does nothing to help the“victim except show up every four years to “remind” them of their “victim hood” in an attempt to maintain their “votes.”

It is “joyful” to see some “blacks” like Carson, Thomas, Rice, etc., who have had the “courage, capacity and desire” to leave the democratic “plantation” of hatred.

In time their “examples” will hopefully make a “difference” throughout their community but perhaps not in my “lifetime,” sigh.

Just more hypocritical “garbage” from clueless celebrities and political organizations who are more interested in “partisan” jabs then working to “create” solutions.

Leslie Jones Wants to Fight “Fuckface”’ Ben Carson


Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on January 2, 2017 by andelino




Use this quick guide to “determine” if you see someone “manspreading.”

You can now have them “arrested” for doing so, especially if they are a “Republicans, Christians or white males.”







Everything people do “right down” to the way they sit must be “sensationalized, made vulgar and hateful” except if it is done by “Democrats and Liberals.”

Democrats and Flies

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on October 25, 2016 by andelino


What is it about Democrats and Flies?


Some of them can’t “keep them zipped.”

Placing your “hand between the legs” of a woman in a skirt who’s “not” your wife is a “grope.”

While Donald Trump talks “smack” about grabbing “pussy” Groper Bill Clinton actually “grabs” pussy.


The look of a “rapist” whose past “smacked” him right “in the face.”

And then others just seem to “attract” them, no matter where they are.

Who doesn’t automatically “shoo a fly away” when it lands on your face?


I’ll tell you who, “evil people,” that’s who.

“It is enough for the disciple that he become like his teacher, and the slave like his master. If they have called the head of the house Beelzebub, how much more will they malign the members of his household!” – Matthew 10:25


So vote for Hillary if you “honestly” think she could possibly be the lesser of “any two evils.”

The flies probably don’t “mean” anything. Her uncanny resemblance to “pure evil” is probably just a coincidence.


“Something wicked this way comes.” Macbeth Act 4, Scene 3

Although you all know about “coincidences.”


Some say it’s a sign Hillary is “full of shit,” or that she’s a “pile of garbage.”

Media “analyst” Mark Dice has the story.

“The evil spirit lies like a fly at the door of the human heart.” Talmud

My Fellow Hebrews

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , on August 23, 2016 by andelino

My Fellow Hebrews 01

The Donald Trump video every Jew MUST watch!

WARNING! A video for Jews ONLY. No, make that a video for leftist Democrat Jews ONLY…No, a video for Hillary Clinton-supporting leftist Democrat Jews ONLY.

And for the few Republican Jews who are leaning toward voting for Hillary Clinton because the media have convinced you that Donald Trump is an anti-Semite.

Ezra Levant of “TheRebel Media” issues an appeal to “my fellow Hebrews,” making the case for a Donald Trump presidency.

My Fellow Hebrews 02…

2016 Elections

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on February 14, 2016 by andelino

2016 Elections 01

The latest NBC News/Wall St. Journal polling “revealed” a rare area of agreement between Democrat and Republican voters, namely that both groups “overwhelmingly” believe that only the merciless “slaughter” of the opposing “party” and its voters can “solve” America’s problems.

Among those identifying as “Republican, Conservative, or Libertarian,” 83 percent favored the wholesale “massacre” of all liberal freaks, while 87 percent of “Democrats, Liberals, and Progressives” supported the total “liquidation” of right-wing lunatics.

“For most of 2015, and now into 2016, the country’s mood was defined by anger at the inexplicable stupidity of the opposition party,” said Democratic pollster Fred Yang of Hart Research Associates, which conducted this survey with Republican “pollster” Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies.

“Now that has abruptly changed to the fear that dissenting opinions will destroy America, and the people’s universal solution seems to be the annihilation of anyone with a differing point of view.”

“It makes perfect sense if you think about it,” continued Yang.

“The Republicans want the poor to starve, the sick to die, and the earth to boil. They oppress minorities, want everyone shooting at each other, and they cling to the First Amendment as if feelings aren’t important. We even try to compromise with them. In order to survive, this country desperately needs government to assume complete control over the economy, but Republicans have an aneurysm over a simple revamping of just the healthcare sector. It’s time they went extinct. ”

2016 Elections 02

“Unicorn-molesting jackasses,” commented McInturff. “Safe zones, Caitlyn Jenner, crappy solar cars… mandatory school lunches that nobody wants. They’d sooner see another 9-11 or a nuclear Iran than offend a single Muslim.”

What kind of “deranged” simpleton thinks that without the “rich” there would be no “poor,” without “guns” there would be no “death,” or that without bureaucratic “oversight” we couldn’t correctly choose the “right” light bulb?

If it was up to them, we’d have a “cabinet” position in charge of “single-ply” toilet paper and another in charge of “double-ply.” America would be better off if we “butchered every last one of them.”

But Democratic pollster Peter Hart “cautioned” that this consensus could be temporary, especially “considering” that the two sides “cannot agree” on a method of execution.

“While Democrats trend towards the creation of a government agency that will, over a period of ten years, reduce the budget deficit while systematically determining and carrying out the most tolerant and humane way of killing Republicans, Republicans just want to take Democrats out back and shoot ’em. Let’s wait and see whether they can even agree on a bloodbath three months from now.”

The poll, conducted through “land line and cell calls” to 2,000 individuals, contains a +/-3 percent margin of error.

2016 Elections 03

With what I believe in the world of conspiracy, I’m not too worried about “caucuses, nominees or elections.”

The republicans and democrats are “two wings of one party” as far as I’m concerned. And the “elites” will get their way regardless of the “person” that wins, they’ve got the money, and history teaches that “money equals power.”

I think that the “party” that wins are just puppets for the larger problem and the larger organization; they’re like the “parts” of a machine, they’re all “interchangeable” and the machine will still do its thing “whether or not” you have part A or part B in there.

I’ll still “vote,” though, even though I’m 95% sure it “means” nothing.

I found this piece titled “In a Sentimental Mood” by Duke Ellington. It brings an image of the “depression” to mind, and I think that that’s where we’re “headed” regardless of what is done.

I think that right now we’re in a transition from a “golden” America to a “gilded” America; it still looks the same on the “outside” but if you scratch it just a bit it shows the real “worthless” material underneath.

There is “treachery” afoot. Reich wing tea bagger Ted Cruz has stolen the Republican vote in Iowa according to Donald Trump, while Sanders and our beloved “titted” Hillary are still ceremonially “mud-wrestling” for the democratic vote.

2016 Elections 04

We were “warned” of this Cruz fellow back in September of 2013.

I just don’t understand why we bother to hold “primaries” especially where brainwashed counties should be considered “voting” sanctuaries and haven’t been purged of the “uneducated superstitious, bible-clinging evangelical nut jobs.”

The American people just need to “drop” to their knees and “gaze” upon the angelic visage of Hillary and bask in the rarefied “glow” of NPR. Just think about all the “money” that is wasted on this that could be “funneled” into a nonprofit personal foundation.

Most of all, I am personally “saddened” that throughout her campaign while side stepping “personal issues, violation of national security, unethical financial tactics and other sordid issues,” Hillary has attempted to “energize” the base of the Democrat party by making us believe she just is an “authentic” liberal.

Besides, who among us can really “honestly” say that they have never, ever had “memory lapses” or accidentally provided “incorrect” information in a job interview? As time does go by does not memories “somehow” just seem to fade?


I just find it hard to “accept” that she has to “run and fight” an uphill battle to return voters to the “experience” of destroying “Hope and Optimism” while removing the last leg of “Logic and Reason.”

Here is a simple video that “reflects some concerns” about America’s future. The part where the “percussion” kicks in will really be your “wake-up” call.

126 things to know about 21 candidates running in 2016

The New “D” Flag

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on July 9, 2015 by andelino

The Confederate Flag 02

As everyone knows by now, the “cleansing” of the South from its “heritage and historical” roots have seen a major “upheaval” in the past weeks thanks to Obama’s “Hope & Change” social justice agenda to bring about “racial” healing to America.

No longer is the “Confederate” flag to be seen or flown anywhere.

Because of the Charleston “shooting,” in which the “historic” Confederate flag had a “major” part in causing, the flag will be made “obsolete” and “banned” forever .

Everything the Confederate flag stood for: “democrats, slavery, hate, racism, homophobia and the eternal plantation,” will now be embodied and replaced in this new, “trendy” flag that represents not only our “modern” times, but the progress to the future of “Next Tuesday.”

The Confederate Flag 03

But do not “fret” over this change, the “symbolism” will still be the same: “democrats, slavery, hate, racism, homophobia and the eternal plantation.”

Here is a suggestion for a “simpler,” new flag to help “indoctrinate” the proles to the new “image” of the South, something they can “easily” get their little consciousness “minds”around.

The Confederate Flag 04

How about just a simple “white” bed sheet to wave. This will help them to easier accept the “defeat” if they are accustomed to “waving” this flag.

I would have suggested a “black” flag because some may think a “white” sheet can be racist but it is the perfect “epitaph” symbol for them. Also we wouldn’t want our brothers, the “ISIS” freedom fighters, to think we are copying them.

This new “D” flag isn’t so much about “defeating” Republicans, since that job has already been “delegated” to American Pravda (AP) and such clever photographers that can actually make a “gun point itself” at one of the many Republicans candidates as a way of “convincing” us all that guns need to be “banned.”

The Confederate Flag 05

The new “D” flag will remind the young “lo-fos” which Party is cooler and trendier.

What would you rather have “tattooed” to your forehead for the next 80 years, an old, worn out “Confederate” flag that still has the colors of “red, white and blue,” or a cool-looking trendy circle with a big blue “D” for “Dummy, Delinquent, Delusional, Dunce and Dipstick” in the center of it?

I think the answer is obvious. The new “D” flag isn’t about “surrender;” it’s about making more “slaves.”

Guns for Liberals

Racism at Target

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on December 19, 2014 by andelino

Michelle Racism 03

People magazine published excerpts from a forthcoming “interview” with the Obama’s in which they relate their “own” personal experiences with “racism” before coming to the White House.

President Obama mentioned “two” experiences:

1. Being handed keys at a valet station while waiting for his car.
2. Being mistaken for a waiter while at a formal dinner dressed in a tuxedo.


“There’s no black male my age, who’s a professional, who hasn’t come out of a restaurant and is waiting for their car and somebody didn’t hand them their car keys.”

Who would have “imagined” Michelle Obama being the “victim” of “racism” at Target?

Michelle Racism 01

For her part, Michelle Obama “appears” to be claiming she was, but this is at “odds” with how she previously told the story. Here she offers the following example:

“I tell this story – I mean, even as the first lady – during that wonderfully publicized trip I took to Target, not highly disguised, the only person who came up to me in the store was a woman who asked me to help her take something off a shelf. Because she didn’t see me as the first lady, she saw me as someone who could help her. Those kinds of things happen in life. So it isn’t anything new.”

In the context in which it appears, the First Lady seems to be “claiming” this incident is an example of “racial” bias.

Michelle Racism 07

It comes right after a paragraph in which Michelle “describes” her husband’s difficulties getting a “cab” in Chicago.

The very next paragraph describes the interview as touching on “the national discussion of race and racial profiling.”

Of course “short” people often ask “tall” people like Michelle who is 5’11” for “help” in stores all the time.

There’s nothing “racial or condescending” about it.

In fact, being asked for “help” reaching something is really the opposite of “belittling” them.

Michelle Racism 04

As for the First Lady’s “experience,” it’s important to note that she was “dressed down” in slacks and wearing a “baseball cap and dark sunglasses” on her trip to Target.

She even “pushed” her own cart. And when the First Lady told this “story” on David Letterman’s show, there was not a “hint” of any “racial” connotation.

On the contrary, Michelle “emphasized” that the woman who asked was “short” and simply didn’t “recognized” her:

“I have to tell you something about this trip though. No one knew that was me. Because a woman actually walked up to me, right –I was in the detergent aisle– and she said, I kid you not, she said ‘Excuse me, I just have to ask you something.’ And I thought cover’s blown. She said, ‘Can you reach on that shelf and hand me the detergent?’ I kid you not. And the only thing she said–I reached up cause she was short–I reached up and pulled it down. She said ‘Well, you didn’t have to make it look so easy.’ That was my interaction. I felt so good…She had no idea who I was. I thought as soon as she walked up I looked my–I was with my assistant–and I said this is it. It’s over. We’re going to have to leave; she just needed the detergent.”

Is it likely someone could “fail” to recognize the First Lady? Anyone who has ever watched a segment of Jay Leno’s “Jaywalking” knows that most “ordinary” Americans are not very familiar with “politicians.”

In this video a young woman does “recognize” a photo of Mrs. Obama but when asked for her name says it’s “Windy.”

Add a “hat and dark glasses” to the photo and chances are a lot of Americans wouldn’t recognize the “First Lady,” especially if she was “pushing” a cart at Target.

Really, what are the odds?

As it stands now, People Magazine is “framing” this as the First Lady’s example of a “recent” experience with “racism.”

If accurate, this seems a very “odd” story to present as evidence of “racial” bias.

Back in 2011, Obama’s “top” adviser, Valerie Jarrett, “mistook” a four-star general for a “waiter” during a fancy dinner hosted by the Alfalfa Club.

Michelle Racism 06

According to a source, as the general “walked” by Jarrett’s table, she “signaled” to him that she wanted more “libation.”

“I’d like another glass of wine,” she reportedly said. Like a gentleman, the “career military” man didn’t make a “fuss” of the matter.

“The guy dutifully went up and got her a glass of wine, and then came back and gave it to her and took a seat at the table,” the source said.

“Everyone is in tuxedos and gowns at this thing, but the military people are in full dress uniform.”

Considering it was Valerie Jarrett, I’m sure she knew “exactly” who she was “demeaning.”

Michelle Racism 05

Or how about being the “guy” who asked Obama to get him a cup of coffee and a “pig in a blanket” a decade ago before he “became” President?

Do you even “tell” that story? Because make no “mistake” people love to tell “President” stories.

If you’ve ever “met” someone who has met President Obama you’ll know almost “immediately” because that will be the “first thing” they tell you.


“I met the President once.” “Oh yeah? Where?” “Um-mm, well it was outside of Gibson’s, I tried to get him to park my Lexus, handed him a quarter, and called him boy, but the details aren’t really important, what’s important is I met him.”

“Racism” is obviously what put this trio of “ingrates” in the White House. These Democrat “race” hustlers are shameless.

Members of the “Democratic” party 150 years ago would have seen Valerie, Michelle and her “worthless” husband all “picking” cotton today on some southern plantation.

Michelle Racism 02

If not for “Republicans” that is. Doesn’t get any more “backwards” than this.

Racism Reaches Even The White House, Obamas Say
Barack and Michelle playing the race card in People Magazine