Islamic Regime in Iran

Immediately following America’s invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, it  was boldly forecasted that it would result in an unmitigated defeat for the world’s lone superpower. “While the United States wants to eliminate terrorism and is becoming much more aggressive in trying to do so, its efforts will fall short. It frankly does not have the necessary will to tackle the enormity of the problem!” Afghanistan’s stunning collapse to the Taliban after America’s ill-conceived and shameless retreat has proved that forecast true.

Realize the significance of this statement: Just as the world’s lone superpower invaded Afghanistan armed with the most sophisticated weaponry ever used in warfare, it was actually forecast that by the end of the failed campaign, not only would Islamic terrorism survive, but Iran, the chief sponsor of terrorism, would emerge stronger than ever.

As the world witnesses the shocking defeat of the United States to the Taliban, it’s worth considering, with a far greater sense of urgency, the resurgent power of the Islamic regime in Iran.

This is not to diminish the extreme catastrophe taking place in Afghanistan, nor the horrific conditions that await the Afghan people as Taliban rule snuffs out any hope of personal freedom. Nor too does it mean not recognizing the legitimate threat that Afghanistan will once again become a launching pad for terrorist attacks on the West.

Make no mistake. Taliban rule in Afghanistan will be horrific for Afghans, as well as threaten peace elsewhere. But don’t let the dramatic footage of towel-headed Taliban fighters wielding AK-47s and driving American-made Humvee’s through the streets of Kabul distract you from the far greater threat Iran currently poses to the world.

The same genocidal ideology that governs the Taliban also reigns supreme in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Yes, the Taliban was shouting death to America as it took over Kabul. But that same chant is heard after Friday prayers every week in Iran, not to mention voiced inside the Iranian parliament in Tehran.

Yes, the Taliban provided safe haven for Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda as he planned the September 11 terrorist attacks in 2001. But it was also the mullahs in Tehran who worked with al Qaeda to give safe passage to the terrorists as they crossed through Iran en route to carry out their attacks.

Furthermore, for the past five years, when it became too dangerous for al Qaeda inside Afghanistan, all the top brass of the group moved to Iran. Even now, the leadership of al Qaeda moves freely inside Iran, acting in consort with, and under the direction of, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Furthermore, while the world wonders what threat al Qaeda may pose in the future if it re-surges in Afghanistan, Iran’s current actions are setting the Middle East on fire.

As Jonathan Spyer wrote in the Wall Street Journal on August 16, “The Taliban’s seizure of power in Afghanistan, while swift and dramatic, is neither the first nor the sole challenge to the U.S. and its allies taking place in and around the region. Iran is mounting another, no less significant push.”

Spyer then detailed several instances over the past few months of Iran pushing at the West: the unprovoked Iranian drone strike on the merchant vessel Mercer Street in the Gulf of Oman, which killed a British crewman and the Romanian captain; the launching of 20 rockets by Iran-backed Hezbollah into Israel (the first time this has happened since the second Lebanon war 15 years ago); the 20 strikes by Iran-backed militias on U.S. targets inside Iraq; an under-reported Iran-led offensive inside Syria, which is bringing its forces closer to attacking both Israel and Jordan.

Yet hardly any of this current Iranian push is reported on by the mainstream press. This is because the chief foreign-policy objective of the Biden administration is to reorient the Middle East in favor of the Iranian regime. In fact, the wall-to-wall coverage of Afghanistan will no doubt act to shield Iran’s continued rise to power, as well as distract from its race to obtain a nuclear weapon. Two weeks ago, Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz declared that Iran is only 10 weeks away from obtaining the bomb.

In fact, it’s possible that the overwhelming coverage of Afghanistan right now could lead many to mistakenly look at Iran as a moderate nation. It’s not a stretch to imagine a scenario in the very near future where the Biden administration looks to partner with Iran at holding back the Taliban in Afghanistan. Taking it one step further, is it possible that the Biden administration announced it was leaving Afghanistan without any preconditions, knowing full well the Taliban would take over immediately, and thus provide added incentive to work together with the Iranians?

If this sounds familiar, it’s because the same thing happened inside Iraq at the end of the Obama administration. In 2011, then Caliph Barack Obama demanded that American forces leave Iraq against the advice of all the top military commanders. This led to the terrorist resurgence in the form of the Islamic State. The sadistic barbarism of the Islamic State shocked the world, which then justified the use of Iran-backed Shiite militias in Iraq to fight alongside the United States to defeat the Islamic State.

While it is unlikely that Iran will desire to take over Afghanistan as it has Iraq, it’s still highly likely that the Taliban takeover will act as a distraction, diverting attention away from Iran’s drive to control the Middle East. The fact is, right now Iran poses a more imminent and more powerful threat to the world than the Taliban could ever muster.

Instead of opining on the threat Taliban rule might pose for the world in the years to come, Iran’s current push for control of the Middle East, and its quest for obtaining nuclear weapons to fulfill its radical genocidal ambitions, demands that we not take our eyes off Iran. Without a doubt, Iran will emerge far stronger from the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan.

The shocking barbarity of the Islamic State consumed a lot of the world’s attention the past few years. In one sense that was understandable. But if people had viewed those events in Afghanistan, they could have seen that there was an even bigger danger that was being overlooked. And that danger is the rise of Iran!

The Islamic State was a distraction in 2014. Will the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan be the distraction in 2021? While America’s defeat in Afghanistan is an important fulfillment in its own right, we cannot allow the Taliban take over to make us overlook the bigger danger posed by Iran.

At the outset of the Afghan War, the Iranian head of the terrorist snake would emerge from American’s invasion “intact, and stronger than ever.” In the aftermath of America’s withdrawal from Afghanistan, don’t be distracted from the real danger in the Middle East.

Continue to watch as Iran grows stronger. It is Iran’s pushy foreign policy that will be the catalyst for major future events.

The Head of the Snake

Takfir Infidels

The recent, long overdue “death” of ISIS chieftain Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi raises the question: “What now?”

ISIS still exists. Its offshoots have “metastasized” all over the world, among jihad movements that fly its flag, such as Boko Haram and al-Shabaab. And its members certainly haven’t “repented.” So what now?

ISIS always had an inherent “strength”: the fervor of Islam. It likewise always had a “vulnerability”: the fervor of Islam. This vulnerability can be exploited.

“Takfir” is an Arabic word best translated into English as “apostate.” This means someone who has left “true” Islam. In Islam, takfir is worse than “infidel.” It is worse than Christian, because at least Christians have not committed the sin of leaving Islam; they were never in it. Takfir is worse than pagan or Christian or Shia. It is even worse than Jew.

In Islam, a difference of opinion of theology between two Muslims means that “If a man calls a brother takfir, then at least one of them is right” according to the Hadith, attributed to Prophet Muhammad.

Therefore, by definition, the other is “wrong,” and being “wrong” means “takfir.” It is not an accusation to be tossed around lightly, because anyone making such an accusation is opening himself up to the same charge.

This was all described in an excellent article that appeared in the Atlantic monthly magazine in 2015: “What ISIS Really Wants.”

It describes the rise of “ISIS” and its founding “caliph” Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. In view of the death of al-Baghdadi in the recent Special Forces raid, this article deserves renewed attention, because it contains hints on how to “exterminate” ISIS once and for all should it raise its “ugly” head again.

“Eschatology” is defined as a branch of theology that deals with prophecies concerning the “End Times.” In Christianity, this primarily means the Book of Revelation and the Book of Daniel.

Islamic eschatology is murkier and more “obscure” than the Christian one, because there is no lengthy source for it.  Instead, Islamic eschatology consists of hints gleaned from the “Qur’an or a Hadith.”

A “Hadith” is a quotation from Islam’s founder, “Prophet” Muhammad. A Hadith is not considered a direct quotation from Allah — those are duly recorded in the Qur’an — but instead comes only from “Prophet” Muhammad, relayed to us via a chain called an “Isnad” of hearsay witnesses. For this reason, some are considered more reliable than others, and the most esteemed of the compilers of Hadiths, Al-Bukhari, actually rejected about 80% of the 300,000 purported Hadiths he examined as being worthless.

The Atlantic article discusses all of this in far greater detail than this writer will here, but for our purposes, Islamic eschatology comes down to this: “only a true caliph can establish an Islamic state.” After the twelfth true caliph, the “Islamic Armageddon” will occur, and the Mahdi will arrive to rule over a “unified” Islamic world. To qualify as a true caliph, the candidate must come from the “Quraysh” tribe that originally inhabited Mecca and must control a stretch of northern “Syria,” from modern Iraq to the Mediterranean.

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi certainly qualified for the first criterion. And when he founded the Islamic State, he controlled the stretch of “Syrian” land mentioned in the prophecies.  In his view, he was the “eighth” true caliph.

What would the Islamic Armageddon look like?  It would consist of the armies of “Rome” converging on Dabiq, where they will meet the armies of “Islam” for the final showdown.  Dabiq is a town in northwest Syria, very near the Turkish border and about forty miles northeast of Aleppo. Al-Baghdadi took this “prophecy” so seriously that he even named his slick ISIS propaganda magazine Dabiq.  At least he did, until Turkish-backed Syrian rebels took the place in October 2016.  The magazine has since borne the title “Rumiya,” after another Islamic prophecy concerning the End Times.

These facts suggest “weaknesses” for ISIS that can prove to be “fatal” if exploited cleverly enough. For one thing, anyone who “claims” to be the caliph and then falls down on the job must “never” have been the caliph. Worse, he must be “takfir”, because he made a “false” Islamic claim.  And worst of all, his followers must all be “takfir”, too!

Although al-Baghdadi made a credible claim to be the caliph, he lost his territory, including the town of Dabiq. No true caliph can do that if he wants to retain the title of caliph. When al-Baghdadi lost his caliphate, he proved himself to be just another “false” caliph. Therefore, he must have been nothing but a “takfir infidel.” His followers must likewise be takfir.

Another recent “wannabe” caliph was Muslim Barack Hussein Obama who also proved to be a “false” caliph, and therefore a “takfir infidel.”

This suggests the line of propaganda that the Trump Administration should now take: “demoralize what is left of ISIS, by shouting that they are all just a bunch of takfir infidels.” Utilize Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals Number 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” In other words “endlessly ridicule ISIS.”

Keep “pounding” this point, day after day. The best time to “kick” a man is when he is already “down” and ISIS is certainly down right now.

Suppose that the “caliphate” revives itself? What do we do then? The prophecy of “Dabiq” also suggests a strategy to wipe out the next “caliphate,” if and when it arrives. Utilize Alinsky’s Rule for Radicals Number 4, which is “Make the enemy live up to his own book of rules.”

The way to do this is to “seize” the town of Dabiq. Drop a brigade combat team of the 101st Airborne Division onto the place, with orders to dig in and wait for “Neo-ISIS” to arrive. And arrive it will. It will not be able not to. For if an army of “Rome”, which is what modern America certainly is, takes Dabiq, then that must mean that the “End Times” are here and the Islamic Armageddon at hand. For a devout follower of ISIS to see that and not take up “arms and fight” the modern “Romans,” is to implicitly “reject” the prophecy.

Which can be nothing but “takfir.” Any Neo-ISIS follower who so reveals himself as “takfir”, proves himself to be undeserving of entry into “Allah’s Great Whorehouse in The Sky.”

In the end, it’s like in the movie Field of Dreams: “If you build it, they will come.” If “Rome” seizes the town of Dabiq, then Neo-ISIS will come. It will be forced to so because failure to do so is “disbelief in the prophecy and therefore takfir.”

And then? Well, “Dabiq” is in the middle of a flat plain consisting of farmland. Any Neo-ISIS army converging there will be right in the open with no cover. And when that Neo-ISIS army “converges” on Dabiq, then that’s why God invented “B-52s” with their Arc Light air raids.

And that’s how to deal with “ISIS” if it ever returns.

 Islam & ISIS
Islamic State Names Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi as Leader

Caliph Obama’s Revolutionaries

Former United States Muslim President Caliph Barack Obama is making big plans for the future. At a conference in Japan last Sunday, he said he wanted to create “a million young Barack Obama’s or Michelle Obama’s.” He announced that the Obama Muslim Foundation—a Chicago-based nonprofit founded in 2014—would be his primary platform for accomplishing this dream.

“After I left office, what I realized is that the Obama Muslim Foundation could potentially create a platform for young, up-and-coming revolutionaries, both in the United States and all around the world to come together, meet together, create a digital platform where they could exchange information,” Caliph Obama said at the Fourth Global Opinion Leaders Summit in Tokyo.

“If I could do that effectively, then—you know—I would create a hundred or a thousand or a million young Barack Obama’s or Michelle Obama’s,” he said. “Or the next group of people who could take that baton in that relay race that is human progress.”

During the discussion, Caliph Obama praised the teens taking part in the “March for Our Lives” movement and demanding more “restrictions on firearm ownership.” He said that a “lot of our problems are caused by old men.”

At least 1.2 million people participated in “March for Our Lives” protests. Leading up to the protests, Barack and Michelle Obama wrote a letter to the students of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, where a 19-year-old former student murdered 17 people with a semiautomatic rifle on February 14. In their letter, they praised the students’ “resilience, resolve and solidarity” and for helping to “awaken the conscience of the nation.”

“Throughout our history, young people like you have led the way in making America better,” they wrote on March 10. “There may be setbacks; you may sometimes feel like progress is too slow in coming. But we have no doubt you are going to make an enormous difference in the days and years to come, and we will be there for you.”

The “March for Our Lives” movement is exactly the type of youth movement the Obama Muslim Foundation will be supporting as the former president seeks to help teenagers take the lead in undoing the problems “caused by old men.”

The children’s crusade for more “firearm restrictions” is similar to the political youth movement for “socialism” led by Sen. Bernie Sanders. Both movements seek to elevate the “opinions of children” above the work of America’s Founding Fathers. Both movements seek to create a better world by “stripping more rights” from individuals and giving that power to an increasingly “dominant central government.”

Generational divisions in American politics are wider now than they have been in decades. The millennial generation is far more supportive of abortion, gun control, homosexuality, immigration, marijuana legalization and socialism than older generations.

 

Politicians like Obama and Sanders “support” these youths in an attempt to kick off a “political revolution.” History shows that when a nation succumbs to “division and infighting,” it becomes vulnerable to “attack by foreign enemies.” Protests over race relations and economic inequality are spiraling into riots, leaving blood in America’s streets.

The Prophet Isaiah foretold this situation over 2,700 years ago: “See now, the Lord, the Lord Almighty, is about to take from Jerusalem and Judah  both supply and support: all supplies of food and all supplies of water, the hero and the warrior, the judge and the prophet, the diviner and the elder, the captain of fifty and the man of rank, the counselor, skilled craftsman and clever enchanter. I will make mere youths their officials; children will rule over them. People will oppress each other— man against man, neighbor against neighbor. The young will rise up against the old, the nobody against the honored.” (Isaiah 3:1-5).

Because of the sins of the nation, God has taken away the ancients—leaders Caliph Obama would call “old men.” God has allowed childish leaders, as well as literal children, to become the nation’s princes, or rulers.

While some of the problems these children protest are legitimate, the churlish spirit of lawlessness driving these youth movements and the journalists and politicians who amplify them is undermining the fundamental principles that created the greatest, freest single nation in history.

The United States does not need children to take the lead; it needs mature adults who can teach, guide and correct the upcoming generation in a responsible, wise, godly way of life.

For more information on the danger posed by youthful revolutionaries, read “The Roots of America’s Dangerous Turn Left.”

Radical Violence Calls

Remember in March when Loretta Lynch called for “radicals, leftists, lone wolves and agitators” to come out of their “comfort zones” and take the “fight to the enemy” on behalf of the Senate Democrats?

Did she get her “wish” along with Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Bernie Sanders and the Obama deep state that has been “vilifying and targeting” the Republican administration?

Was that the purpose behind the “bizarre”video?

“I know that his is a time of great fear and uncertainty for so many people. I know it’s a time of great concern for people who see our rights being assailed, being trampled on and even being rolled back. I know that this is difficult, but I remind you that this has never been easy.”

She urged the “radical” Democrats to attack their “enemies” of other political “stripes,” saying:

“We have always had to work to move this country forward to achieve the great ideals of our founding fathers. And it has been people, individuals, who have banded together. Ordinary people who simply saw what needed to be done and came together and supported those ideals, who have made the difference. They’ve marched, they’ve bled, yes, some of them have died. This is hard, every good thing is. We have done this before, we can do this again.”

She’s deliberately “vague” and those words can be “interpreted” in a multitude of ways.

Here are some “other” Democrats calling for “violence” in the streets.

“Fanatics” often hear what they “want to hear” and interpret things the way “they choose to.”

They “bleed” just as Lynch recommended, just as a “terrorist” do in the pursuit of their “political” ideology.

They “die” as per guidance from a former “Chief Law Enforcement Officer” of the United States.

There is no “shortage” of reckless incitement to “violence” and assassination “threats” by the left.

The “corrupt” Democrats in the Senate and this most “criminal” former Attorney General have “helped” to set the agenda.

“Violence” is the way “forward” for them. Fomenting “chaos and discord” is the Democrat specialty, particularly under Caliph Obama’s “resistance” meddling.

The “evidence” of these facts is “everywhere” you turn.

Loretta Lynch calls for violent protests against Trump
Former AG Lynch Facing Possible 5-10 Years Behind Bars
Grassley Feinstein Agree To Subpoena Comey For Answers In Lynch Clinton Collusion
Feinstein Calls For Senate Investigation Into Lynch Comey Collusion With Clinton
POLITICAL VIOLENCE IS A GAME THE RIGHT CAN’T WIN
Assassination List Found On James Hodgkinson’s Body
Radical Agenda EP317 – Ultimate Punishment

Hypocrite Hillary

Hillary Clinton tells the “suck ups” in the audience at the sexist “Women in the World” gathering that she is “doing pretty well, all things considered.”

If she means that she’s not in “prison for life” or under “death penalty investigation for espionage and treason” and filthy rich to “boast as a result of her crimes,” who could argue.

Instead of being in “jail” she’s getting paid to “whine” to a bunch of sycophantic “morons” about losing “despite” her best efforts to “cheat and steal” her way into the White House.

Clinton plays the “sympathy card” saying the aftermath of the election was “so devastating that everything that has come to light in the days and weeks since has been also, troubling.” 

She must be “talking” about the Democrats, led by Susan Rice and Caliph Obama “spying” on her opponent.

Yeah, Clinton, that’s got to “bother” her almost as much as Donna Brazile “feeding” her debate questions or her husband “meeting” Loretta Lynch in her airplane for some “last minute negotiations.”

Troubling is “hardly” a strong enough characterization, “outrageous” would be better.

Clinton revealed that she had been taking a lot of “long walks in the woods,” probably meeting up with “Russian agents” after learning that email isn’t the most “secure way to sell government secrets.”

“So, I’m okay,” she says, “as a person I’m okay. As an American, I’m pretty worried.”

The woman who laid all of our “secrets” open to every nation around the world “claims” to be concerned about future “instances” of Russian hacking.

She bases it on the “false” narrative that she’s pitching as the “real reason she lost.”

It’s not because she’s a “crook” who destroyed everything she touched and “sold” out her nation, it’s because Russia “released” her emails, the same thing she did to America.

It’s no big “deal” when Hillary does it, but Putin is “evil incarnate” when he’s “falsely” accused.

She says she “believes” what Putin wanted to do was sow “distrust and confusion,” as well as “influence” elections. That’s the job “She, Obama and CNN” were doing. Is she now “worried” about “foreign” competition?

Old hag Hillary “brags” that she’s knows Putin very well and has “sat” with him before, calling him somebody who “plays” the long game.

Perhaps he’ll be back in 2020 for more “illegal” American uranium if Clinton should “run” and win in 2020, or is “working” with the Podesta brothers on some “banking and energy” sector deals.

She claims that people ask “why” Putin would do such a thing to her, the “fake” election meddling, not the “bribes” for the uranium.

Clinton explained, “I don’t think it’s too complicated, he had his desire to destabilize us and others and, you know he’s not exactly fond of strong women, so you add that together and that’s pretty much what it means.”

Putin may not be fond of “treasonous” women who  sell out their country for “personal” profit, or older, unattractive “globalist” women like Hillary, but not “strong” women.

His Foreign Ministry Spokesperson, Maria Zakharova, is “quite” strong. She’d eat Hillary for “lunch” and have the intestinal “fortitude” to choke back the overwhelming “gag” reflex.

She demonstrates that “strength” regularly, most recently in warning CNN  and the US media about the “fake” Russia news you always repeat.

Another “strong” woman, Irina Rodnina, an MP from Vladimir Putin’s United Russia party and a triple Olympic champion figure-skater, took on Caliph Obama by “posting” a picture of him being “tempted” by a banana.

Putin didn’t seem too “intimidated” or put off by her strength in “challenging” the American Muslim “usurper.”

It’s probably just a simple matter of “revulsion,” Hillary. Even a former KGB agent finds you “disgusting.”

A producer at the “Women in the World” event had an “awkward” moment when he was “caught” in the spotlight helping “frail” Hillary onto the stage.

The “backstage” assistant could be seen with his “hand” on Clinton’s back “pushing” her onto the stage and “pointing” her in which direction to “walk” to get to her position.

Hillary “gingerly” walked across the stage to “greet” Samantha Bee, who introduced her, letting out hearty “barks” while negotiating the riser.

Moments later, Clinton “conquered” the single step before “plunging” into the seat.

All that’s left “now” is to be being “hung, drawn and quartered.”

Mr. President, I’m sorry.
Hillary’s Other Private Email Server Troubles
Hillary Clinton cites ‘Misogyny’ as cause for her defeat
Hillary Clinton Explains Why She Really Lost to Trump
Clinton Tells Trump How To Handle ISIS And Syria Problems She Created
Syrian Calls Clinton, Left Hypocrites – Wants Safe Zones Inside Syria
A New Fairy Tale about How Hillary ‘Forgot’ White Voters
The ultimate hypocrite, Hillary Clinton

Church of Climatology

Democrats often “recommend” someone take away President Trump’s “cell phone” in order to “prevent” him from engaging in “unscripted” tweeting.

While that is not “necessary,” the same cannot be “said” for House Minority Leader Pelosi and a “live” microphone.”

Nancy invokes the “real” God in a “weak” defense of the Democrat’s religion of climatology, a sure sign that they’ve run out of “options” and their recognition that vague “alarmism” in pressing  their “wealth distribution” disguised as “environmentalism” agenda has failed them.

The same God who isn’t so “pleased” with her enabling the “murder” of unborn children as a “woman’s right” is now somehow the spokesperson for the “heathen” Democrats when it serves their “planetary” control through the “earth worship” agenda.

Pelosi says, “We have a moral responsibility to be good stewards of God’s creation and in doing so we must pay special attention to the needs of the poor.”

She got a “two-for one” in that, the facade of the “climate change” pretext combined with the “wealth redistribution” substance of the agreement.

She continued, “garbling” some of her words, describing it as an “environmental justice” issue as well as an “evangelical community” issue.

The “environmental justice” angle meant that failing “voluntarily” paying international “climate reparations,” disguised as an another form of  “wealth redistribution,” was the primary “content” of the Paris agreement.

Pelosi who knows nothing of “what she speaks” described the Pope talking of “air pollution” while visiting his globalist ally, the “impostor” Caliph Obama.

What does “air pollution have to do with CO2?”

She quotes the “globalist” Pope stating the obvious as if it is somehow “profound,” saying, “The climate is a common good belonging to all and meant for all.”

Pelosi goes on to quote the “evangelical community” issue by unwisely “fabricating” scripture as she pretends to “quote” God’s Word.

“The Bible tells us that to minister to the needs of God’s creation is an act of worship. To ignore those needs is to dishonor the God who made us. And that is just what we’re doing by walking away from the Paris accord.”

Good preachers cite “chapter and verse” when quoting scripture and they don’t “fabricate” Bible passages to suit their “political” goals.

Obviously, Nancy is not a “well versed preacher.”

She used that same “quote” on her religious holiday of “Earth Day, April 2008,” and was questioned on it then, since it appears “nowhere” in the Bible.

She never answered the questions then and is now “succumbing” to her mental “dementia” deterioration.

Consistent with Democrat “methodology,” vague fabrications are a Pelosi “trait,” while imagining what the Bible might “reveal” if she ever actually “opened and read” the scriptures.

She then goes on to make a “comment” that would, if she were capable of “shame,” really embarrass this “ignorant” liberal old hag.

“The question I have for Donald Trump as a mother and a grandmother of five and a grandmother of nine, how is he ever going to explain to his grandchildren what he did to the air they breathe, assuming they breathe air. And I have to assume that is the case, we all do, right?”

No, Nancy, wilting “vegetables” like you breathe “carbon dioxide,” and it’s the best “argument” made to date for “minimizing” those emissions.

Not to be outdone by “false” Preacher Pelosi, Climate “guru” and Internet “inventor” Al Gore told “Interview Magazine” that God didn’t “create” global warming but wants “him to fix it.”

Gore “equated” the fight against global warming to a “religious-based, moral crusade similar to the civil rights fight, women’s suffrage, and the abolitionist movement during the Civil War era.”

He insisted that it is a “moral imperative” to fight against climate change saying, “And if you are a believer, as I am, I think God intends for us to open our eyes and take responsibility for the moral consequences of our actions.”

Let me “boil” this down to the main question: Do we have a God “fearing” Al Gore, or do we have an Al Gore “fearing” God?

Or do they both “live in fear” of each other? And if so, who “fears whom more?”

Al Gore said he was “inaccurately” quoted. I did not say “God told me.” I said “I told God.” There’s an important “difference” since God listens to “me and not the other way around.”

That means that “Mother Earth” listens to me also. The “Trees” listen to me. The “Ants” listen to me. The “Cosmos” listens to me. And “Democrats” listen to me.

“Everyone” and “Everything“ listen to me “except” Polar Bears and Tipper.

Polar Bears used to “listen” to me, but when I “predicted” their extinction, they stupidly began “multiplying” and are now threatening to “extinct” baby seals.

Tipper stopped “listening” to me, after I asked a Portland OR “therapist” for back rubs and “penis” massages, and now she’s a “non-entity.”

But we must “ignore” the Polar Bears and Tipper because it’s “scientifically” proven that there are “heretics” in any scientifically “conclusively” proven religion.

Well, this should settle the ”Church of Climatology” religion.

God ‘Can Take Care of’ Climate Change
Al Gore Says God Told Him to Fight Global Warming
Pope Al Gore brings us a message from God!
Climate Alarmists: Abort Your ‘Extra’ Children
Science fights back against the global warming fraud

Warehouses of Jihad

How Muslims Take Control of America
By Amil Imani

They do it first by establishing “mosques” in every town and city. These meeting places are “perfect” warehouses of not only “indoctrination,” but future “terrorists” cells who are made to “read and understand” the principles of “jihad, martyrdom, and Dar-al-Harb” meaning “land of war” – any place not Islamized.”

Mosques cost lot of “money,” and the money for these warehouses of “hate” is coming straight from “Saudi Arabia.” These mosques are being “infused” with an activist “strain” of Islam, Wahhabism.

If you have to ask “where” the Saudis are getting their money, you are not “paying” attention…it’s coming from “you.”  According to “The Mosque in America: a National Portrait,” a survey released in April 2001, there were at “least” 1,209 mosques in the U.S.  Today, it’s “estimated” that that number has “quadrupled.”

Mosque Leaders Promote Sharia

Mosque “elders” tend to be sent to the U.S. with one clear mission: “make Sharia law the supreme rule within the United States, using any and all tactics necessary.”

Next, from within the “safety” of their local mosques, they begin to use their “revolting practices, riotous youth, and wild sermonizing” to force genteel Americans to “relocate” to safer, less threatening “neighborhoods” and cities.

Of course, not all Americans will “move” or can afford to do so.  To take “control” of a town, Muslims will not need to “evict” everyone.  They probably need about “25%” in order to make life very “unpleasant” for those who do “not go along” with their demands.

Political Islamist Infiltration

They will “elect” Muslims to all positions of “local” influence, who will “create and enforce” policy according to the Quran.  Once they have “control” over a town, they will begin to establish “informal” Sharia law, and there’s nothing the “government” can, or will want to, do about it.

Sharia law is the “brutal” means by which Islam controls its populations by “force, intimidation, and punishments” for offenses to Allah.

Already, in many European countries, national governments have, “out of fear,” given Islamic fascists the right to “establish” their own shadow governments within the “borders” of countries like Sweden, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, France, and England, where they can “control” their own populations without “accountability.”  Proposals for “Sharia laws” are being already “implemented”  in Canada and the USA.

This is an “admission” that Islam is not “just” a religion.  It is a “deadly” cult.  It seeks “total” control over a person’s “mind and body.”  As such, “our” Constitution is totally “incompatible” with it.

Muslims will “push” politicians for local control and “self-determination” of their own laws.  In this way, America will become two nations: “a weakened traditional one and a growing, menacing Islamized one.”

Islamists Ally with Leftists

At the same time, Muslims will ally with leftist politicians, who will gladly cede some of their “power” to this group of enforcers, so “conservative” politicians and Christians who advocate “self-defense and sane social policies” are kept out of office.

Money that was once “used” to build mosques will now be used to “buy” politicians.  On university campuses, “Islam” will be portrayed as “righteous and peaceful,” while Christianity will be associated with “evil Western and American values.”  Rebellious American “youths” like BLM, OWS, Antifa, etc. will “eat” it up.

There will be “increasing” local and regional incidents of “crimes and threats” against Christians, Jews, and “anybody” who speaks out against the “religion of hate.”  Terrorism is a completely “legitimate” tool of Islam and was widely “practiced and advocated” by Muhammad.

Remember: all words in the Quran are “perfect, immutable laws defining an eternal ethic”:

Against them (the unbelievers) make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly. Quran 8.06

Leftist “politicians” will continue to hold the “Bill of Rights” over anyone who dares to “accuse” Islam of “wrongdoing.”  Islamized “citizens” will ignore skyrocketing “crime and threats.”  They will look the other way for “fear of retribution, honor killings, and punishments” from those who “uphold” the Islamic requirement to seek “revenge” on anyone who “dishonors or disagrees” with Islam.

Eventually, America will become “weakened,” and politicians will allow “Muslims” to do whatever they want, as long as the “infidels” are allowed to be free of “terrorist” threats.  As Christianity “wanes,” people will reject it as an “anachronism” irrelevant to modern trends.  Islamic “ethics” will prevail, and Muslim “sects” will gain members, money, and influence.

Islam Will Destroy Our Constitution

As government policies “lean” toward Islamic ideals, the Bill of Rights will be seen as “archaic” and out of touch with “contemporary” values and the new “direction” of the country.  It will be just a “piece of parchment” in a museum, lacking anyone who would be so “bold and revolutionary” as to fight a religion, even a “religion of hate and killing.”

Regrettably, a vast “ignorance” prevails in this sphere.  Academic “liberal pundits, leftist journalists, hired Islamic apologists and useful idiots” proclaim that Islam is a “religion of peace” and that the great “majority” of Muslims are not a “party” to any plans and actions of “radicals.”

Islam Is Irreconcilable with Our Culture

So how do we “stop” this sequence of events?  How can “our” government, which has so effectively protected the “rights” of peaceful religions, protect us from an “aggressive” one?  How should we put “Islam” out of business?

“By massive allocation of an educational campaign while simultaneously declaring Islam for what it is: an ideology irreconcilable with our core beliefs enshrined in the universal declaration of human rights and the United States Declaration of Independence and Constitution.  By treating Islam the way we treated Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan, and Maoists.  By preventing Islamization of our country by all legal measures and staunchly resisting the creeping sharia in our society.”

It is time to “realize” that not all religions “are” the same.  If a religion does not “recognize” the constitutional “rights” of others, it must “lose” its rights under First Amendment “protections.”

If it “seeks” to control all aspects of our life by “force and fraud,” or if it seeks “exemption” from national laws protecting “constitutional” rights, then it must not be “considered” a religion.

It must be called “something” else, and it cannot be “recognized” as a protected “ideology” under the First Amendment.

“O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: they are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guides not a people unjust.” Quran 5:51

“Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despite-fully use you, and persecute you.“ Matthew 5:44

Any “religion or dogma” that seeks to create its own “government” and its own “legal system” and seeks to “mobilize its own militia” is not interested in separation of “church and state” and has no right to use that “separation” to create hegemony.

In fact, such a “doctrine” is not even a “religion” at all.  It is a “totalitarian regime” and must be considered the “enemy” of everything Americans believe in.

I’d welcome an “inspection” of other religions to “determine” if they are truly “peaceful,” and I am “confident” that all other faiths will remain “protected and unaffected” because religions tend to be “peaceful.”

There is only one “faith” that seeks global “hegemony” for a seamless “church-state” government and “imposition” of its law everywhere, and that’s Islam, the “Religion of Peaceful Killing.”

Obama & Turkish Dictator Erdoğan Open The Largest Turkish Mosque In The World in USA
Political Islam ‘Incompatible’ with Constitution