Archive for bestiality


Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on May 27, 2020 by andelino

Did Jesus Say Anything About Homosexuality?”
By Shane Idleman

My hope is that readers will read the entire article before drawing conclusions. I have nothing but “compassion” for those trapped in “sexual” sin. Those who strongly believe in the Bible and God’s will regarding sexual “behavior” also strongly believe in unconditional “love and forgiveness.”

To say that authentic Christians “hate or fear” those trapped in the homosexual lifestyle demonstrates a gross “misunderstanding” of the Christian faith. To “confront in love” simply comes from a “desire” to honor God and to truly “love and care” for others. “The ability to relate to people on their level, show genuine concern, and love them regardless of their lifestyle is the mark of true Christianity.”

In case you don’t continue reading, let me offer some encouragement: “if you’re hopeless, depressed, and confused, look to the One who created you. He has the answers.”

No matter what you have done, you have the “ability” to turn to Christ and start anew: “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved” (Romans 10:9). “If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come” (2 Corinthians 5:17).

It’s no surprise that the church, and our nation, desperately need to hear “the voice of one crying in the wilderness” to awaken, convict, and restore. It was not so long ago that we were concerned about “the fall of America.”

America cannot fall because she has already fallen. We are now picking up the pieces of a “broken” nation reflected in our laws, lives, families, and children. America’s moral heartbeat has ceased because we cut off the source of life. We need “resuscitation, renewal, and revival of the truth.”

When people, groups, denominations, or movements “depart” from absolute truth, and thus, quench and grieve the Spirit of God, they become mechanical in their approach to Christianity and lose the ability to guide. The Word of God is not in their hearts “like a burning fire” (Jeremiah 20:9), but relative, powerless, and debatable. This is what we see today.

Unfortunately, those who are sounding the alarm are often categorized as “irrational, judgmental, bigoted, and intolerant.” But how can we warn if we won’t confront, correct if we won’t challenge, and contend if we won’t question? We must speak the truth in love…the Bible is crystal clear on “sexual sin, including homosexuality.”

Why is there a “lack of conviction” today? The reason may not be in the pew, but in the pulpit. Much depends on the “prayer life” of the preacher. Pastors, preachers, and teachers must spend extended time in “prayer” to be truly effective—God prepares the “messenger” before we prepare the message. Luther’s motto, “He that has prayed well has studied well,” rings true.

I’m convinced that the majority of the churches in America are seeking to please the “masses rather than convict.” Judgment is never mentioned; repentance is rarely sought; and sin is often excused. We want to “build” a church rather than “break” a heart; be “politically” correct rather than “biblically” correct; “coddle and comfort” rather than “stir and convict.”

This leaves people “confused and deceived” because we teach and live a form of Christianity “void of repentance and void of truth.” Consider the following in light of Jesus’ teachings…in light of the truth:

The “moral” laws in the Old Testament such as “killing, stealing, lying, adultery, sexual immorality,” and so on are all valid today. Jesus referred often to the Old Testament, and said that He didn’t come to abolish it, but to fulfill it.

Although many of the ceremonial and dietary laws of the Old Testament do not apply today, the moral laws do. They are as significant today as they have been throughout history.

For example, Leviticus 20:13 states, “If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination….” To suggest that this verse is “invalid” today is to advocate the dangerous practice of “redefining or deleting” what God has said. Jesus referred to the Old Testament often in regard to “moral behavior.”

The consequences of wrong actions may have changed, but the moral implications remain the same. For instance, even though we no longer “stone to death” those who commit adultery, this does not mean that adultery is “acceptable” or any less dangerous. Adultery is wrong even though there aren’t legal consequences.

Jesus condemned “all” sexual activity outside of marriage between a man and woman when He said, “Out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornication’s…these defile a man” (Matthew 15:19).

Jesus was implying that all sexual activity outside of marriage between a man and a woman is harmful and immoral. The word “fornication” in the Greek is porneia; where the word “pornography” comes from. We cannot say, “But I was born this way,” because we were all born to “lie, cheat, lust, and deceive,” but this doesn’t make it right…it makes us “sinful and in need of a Savior.”

An argument cannot be based solely on silence. To suggest that Jesus approved of homosexuality simply because He did not use the term “homosexual,” is to imply that He approved of “necrophilia, pedophilia, incest, and bestiality.” But, of course, we know better.

Other passage in the New Testament are clear on this issue as well. Romans 1:18-32 and 1 Corinthians 6:1-20 are good places to start. In short, mankind did not see fit to “acknowledge” God and thereby “suppressed” the truth; therefore, God gave them over to a “depraved mind” to do those things which are not proper.

Homosexual behavior, and sexual sin in general, is comparable with “dishonoring” the body and “turning” from God. “The sexual disordering of the human race is a judgment of God for exchanging Him for the creature” John Piper wrote.

Jesus said that since the beginning of creation, God created them male and female in order that they would be joined together and become one flesh. He adds, “Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate” (Mark 10:9).

Marriage between a man and a woman is God’s plan since “creation.” No matter how many laws are passed in favor of “gay marriage”, it will not change God’s mind or His Word. Mankind often “rebels” against God; this is nothing new.

In closing, Jesus would often speak out against “sin”, but His love and mercy also reached out to those who “regretted and hated” their condition. Forgiveness is a mark of “genuine” faith.

We should have “compassion” for those who struggle with “same sex attraction” because we all struggle with sin, but at the same time, we should not “condone or excuse” this type of sin any more than we condone or excuse any other sin.

Cenk Uygur’s Sex Rules with Animals

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on December 21, 2019 by andelino

Turkish “Muslim” Cenk Uygur, who wants to “run” for Congress denies the “Armenian Genocide” but wants you to know “Sex with Animals” is just fine with him.

Cenk Uygur, a former MSNBC commentator and founder of “The Young Turks”, a far left activism website, announced his candidacy for the 2020 special election in California’s 25th Congressional district to succeed “lesbian” Katie Hill, who resigned in “disgrace for sexual harassment of her staff.”

Not only does Uygur deny the “Armenian Genocide” in which more than one million Christians were “slaughtered” by the Turkish “Muslim Ottomans”, also known as “The Young Turks”, he also described women as “genetically flawed” because they don’t want to have “sex with him as frequently as he considers desirable.”

Cenk Uygur is a “sick” Muslim and needs to be “exposed” to what he really is.

How in the world do we get such “bestiality” loving Muslim candidates running for United States Congress?

Here is a photo of Cenk Uygur pleasuring his horse mentioned in the above video.

He is likely to be worse than “throupler” Katie Hill who resigned from office. It is too bad that people do not use their “heads” and think about the people they are trying to “vote” into office.

Cenk Uygur is just another filthy, disgusting Turkish “evil” scum who thinks “bestiality” is okay with the “consent” of the animal. He is basically a “communist” backed by “Act Blue”, a Soros-Brock organization.

Uygur has a long history of “sexism, racism and anti-Semitic views.” If people vote for him they can’t be called conservatives. This man is the “spawn of hell.”

Even “Socialist” Bernie Sanders wants to have “nothing to do” with Cenk Uygur and “retracted” his earlier endorsement.

Cenk Uygur Sexists Rules
Armenian Genocide
Armenian Genocide
Bernie Sanders Retracts Endorsement of Young Turks’ Cenk Uygur

Sheep Shagging

Posted in sex with tags , , , , , , on February 5, 2014 by andelino

Man Rejected by Cow 00

Last September in North London, a 61-year-old IT worker allegedly went looking for “love in all the wrong places”. So wrong in fact, that he wound up in Wood Green Crown Court in front of a jury that reportedly was less than sympathetic to the man’s “fruitless” search for loving companionship.

You see, jurors were told the story of Paul Lovell who was spotted by a picnicking couple September 4, allegedly attempting to have “intercourse with a sheep” near the Tottenham Hotspur training ground in north London. The court heard powerful testimony in which witnesses placed Lovell 250 yards away from their picnic “laying on the floor, taking his shorts off,” near a line of trees before getting busy “buggering” the sheep.

Jurors took their civic duty with the “utmost” seriousness, until they heard the reason Mr. Lovell turned his “affections” toward the sheep. They broke into fits of laughter after hearing that a cow “rejected” his attempts  to procure “fellatio of the bovine” variety. When cows would not “fellate” him, the court was told that the accused decided to “try his luck with some sheep.” 

Rather than admiring his “can do spirit”, the jury erupted in laughter invoking a warning from Judge James Patrick who said “I well understand there are aspects of the case that are unusual and amusing. If you do find the case particularly funny, if you can try to get over your laughter over lunch that would be great.”

Prosecutors had previously dropped a charge of “indecent exposure” due to lack of evidence but adjusted the wording of a second charge of outraging public indecency to include “fellatio with a cow.” 

Lovell is currently on bail with the condition that he “not return to the place of his alleged romp.”

Man Rejected by Cow 02

This brings up the phenomena is “sheep fuckery a myth? The answer is a resounding “No.” From the Yorkshire moors to Americas deep south to as far as the far east stories of “sex with animals” pass around like “barn yard” smells.

I have read that in many Middle Eastern countries it is “prohibited” to eat the sheep you had sex with. A person who decided to eat this sheep is making a “deadly sin”, and will never get into paradise to “enjoy” his 70 virgins.

In Lebanon, men are officially “allowed” to have sex with animals. Yet, an important restriction is applied: “the animal must be female.” For sex with male animals “death penalty” can be imposed. Cheeky.

A man from Haaksbergen, near Utrecht, the Netherlands, was reported to police after a farmer caught him having “sex with a sheep.” But the case was “thrown out” of court as the sheep couldn’t take to the stand to “testify it didn’t want to have sex and had suffered emotional stress.” Under Dutch law, “bestiality” is not a crime unless it can be proved “the animal didn’t want to have sex.”

So here we have but three examples of “sexual intercourse” with animals written in law. A “myth” it is most definitely not.

That begs the question what “percentage of the world’s population” has had or is having regular or indeed irregular “sexual contact with sheep.” Specifically sheep, no hogs, bulls, horses, antelope, bison or any other creature, just sheep.

The answer I can tell you as given by the UK Sunday Sport Newspaper and clarified by Wikipedia is that a staggering “1 in 1000” of the world’s population has “tapped” a sheep’s ass. That is 6, 692, 030,28 people worldwide who are not content with just “eating” lamb or wearing woolly” socks. Incidentally this is the “combined population” of Wales and New Zealand.

With so many people in the world “shacking” up with sheep should we be more tolerant towards those that “indulge” in such practices? Are the actions of “sheep shaggers” shameful or should we accept them as harmless “life choice or sexual preference?” Can we not just leave the relationship between “loving man and sheep” be as is?”

Man Rejected by Cow 01

Well herein lies the problem. You see although sheep aren’t stupid they cannot “vocalize a choice” in who or what decides to  “hump” them. Hence the action of attempting intercourse with the sheep is fundamentally “one sided” and purely sexually driven and based on these facts “ultimately” wrong.

Even though some “sheep shaggers do express emotions of “love to their sheep” this love cannot be reciprocated. Or can it? Perhaps the Jury is still out on this issue.

I mean if a sheep can “memorize” other sheep and even humans and  express “emotions of fear” could it not also express “pleasure?” Is it completely out of the “realms of reality” to envision a sheep spontaneously “bound” across a field to its owner, pivot round, pushing its backside up towards the skies and “bleat profusely to be pleasured.” Would this be consent?

Well there is currently no conclusive “evidence or studies” to prove this theory so until there is, “sheep shagging and bestiality” of any kind will remain a largely “criminal activity” kept behind closed barn doors.

Man Rejected by Cow 04

Nothing wrong with anal sex as long as it’s with sheep…

%d bloggers like this: