Russia’s Biggest Bank Paid Podesta To Fight US Sanctions
Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank
Podesta Didn’t Register As A ‘Foreign Agent’ When He Represented A Bank With Ties To Russian Spy Agencies
Obama and Russian Ambassador’s Dalliance with Nucleons
Behind the collapse of the ‘Russia hacking’ narrative, is panic spreading in the Obama camp?
Archive for barack obama
Former President Barack Obama ran his campaign on “change” and said he would “fundamentally transform America.” For eight years he added “action” to his words, and America has “indeed” been transformed, “fundamentally.”
President Donald Trump’s campaign “inspired” support by “opposing” Obama’s transformations.
Candidate Trump said “undoing” what Obama had done would be easy: “He could nullify his executive actions by issuing executive actions of his own.”
When President Trump “got to work” in January, he began “signing” them right away.
But is “reversing” eight years of Obama as simple as signing “executive actions” with the signature “Donald J. Trump”?
Is it as “simple” as a Republican-controlled Congress “repealing laws” passed by the previous Democrat-controlled Congresses?
In reality, Obama made “eight” years of systemic changes: “not only legal and regulatory, but also cultural, moral and psychological.” Some of this “transformation” of America cannot be “reversed.”
Let’s start with “young” Americans. The Obama “Justice Department and Education Department” enforced “policies, regulations and laws” that prevent educators from “disciplining insubordinate” students.
They “argued” that since statistics show that “black” teenagers are disciplined at a “higher” rate than white students, thus American “teachers and administrators” are racist.
Obama’s bureaucracy “coerced” and even “prosecuted” schools into leaving two high school generations “unrestrained and unpunished.” The result is millions of young people have been “educated” to throw off “rules and laws.”
Obama also “attacked” America’s prison system, “accusing” it of systemic racism. He “blamed” the makeup of “jail populations” not on law “breaking,” but on the “law” itself, particularly the “judges and law enforcement officers.”
He “accused” police of “racism” so vile “claiming” that officers often murder a “man” simply because he “is” black.
By the end of Obama’s “second” term, it had become much more common to see people “marching in the streets, trashing public places, beating people on the sidewalks, and rioting in cities like Ferguson and Baltimore.”
Fringe “arguments” received the vocal support of the “highest” office in the country. Eight years on, many more Americans now “mistrust, disrespect and even attack law enforcement officers.”
Many hate the “law” more than they hate the “crime.”
Obama, occupying an office created to “enforce” the law, personally “undermined” the rule of law, in some cases openly “refusing” to enforce laws that his office is specifically “required” to enforce.
His “enforcement” of immigration was “lawless” at best, completely “anti-law” at worst.
Obama gave a presidential “endorsement” to many more issues that “fundamentally” weakened America’s “culture, economy and security.”
He “flung” the doors wide open on the “entitlement” culture and spent hundreds of billions giving away “phones, health care, money” and more. He “hooked” tens of millions more people on “welfare benefits.”
He passed a gargantuan “health-care” law, and the largest “tax” in history, which was a massive federal “overreach” into Americans’ personal lives.
He became the biggest “spender” in world history, “accumulating” twice as much “debt” as all his predecessor and nearly “doubling” the national debt to “almost” $20 trillion.
Can that be “paid” back with “interest” with a “few” signatures?
Obama also “invited” into the White House “Black Lives Matter,” an organization whose website “reveals” that it has as much or more to do with “anti-constitutional socialism and race-baiting.”
He “bathed” the outside of the White House in the colors of the “homosexual/bisexual/transsexual/queer/intersexual/etc.” flag, celebrating the newfound “right” of homosexuals to “marry.”
President Trump has said he is not “interested” in challenging this law, which by “itself” fundamentally “transforms” America.
Obama “successfully” used the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service as “political” weapons. He presided over the “surveillance” of journalists, the mass surveillance of “average” Americans, and the targeted “killing” of American citizens involved in “terrorism.”
His Justice Department “provided” a framework arguing that the “federal government” sometimes has the “legal right to kill Americans without trial,” overseas and at home.
The most fundamental “transformation” Obama accomplished can be summarized in one word: “lawlessness.” The most important American office for enforcing “laws” was occupied by a man who instead enforced his “personal“ will.
Unshackling the presidency from its “constitutional” limitations is one of the most “dangerous” transformations of all, no matter who “occupies” the Oval Office.
The worst “legacy” of the Obama administration was the “erosion of the rule of law.”
In 2017, America is a “different” nation from what it “was” on Jan. 20, 2009. To sign away some of Obama’s “destructive” policies and laws will be easy, but to “confront” America’s changed “mentality” will not.
To instead “leave it as it is” will be easy; to “transform” it back to the “way it was, much less to make it great,” will not. That’s because the Obama years appealed to an “ugly, destructive and powerful” element: “our lawless human nature.”
The only way to truly “roll back” the Obama years is to change our own “hearts and attitudes” toward law.
Many of you lead “busy” lives and may not have the “time, the ability, or perhaps even the stomach” to watch another “dreadful” speech from Comrade Obama.
As a public service, the speech has been “reduced” to its “bare” essentials to spare you the “pain” of watching his “Castro-like” address.
And who can “forget” Obama’s statements on “illegal” wiretapping’s…
Here is Obama’s “farewell” address:
One final “batch of lies” from our 44th President…
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson was roundly “criticized” by celebrities like Samuel Jackson, Leslie Jones and Whoopi Goldberg after he referred to the “slaves” from Africa as “immigrants” with dreams and hopes for their children’s futures.
President Barack Obama used “similar” language to include African-Americans “descended” from slaves among the immigrants who “helped” shape America.
Here is Obama in 2015:
“Certainly, it wasn’t easy for those of African heritage who had not come here voluntarily and yet in their own way were immigrants themselves. There was discrimination and hardship and poverty. But, like you, they no doubt found inspiration in all those who had come before them. And they were able to muster faith that, here in America, they might build a better life and give their children something more.”
Here is Carson in 2017:
“That’s what America is about, a land of dreams and opportunity. There were other immigrants who came here in the bottom of slave ships, worked even longer, even harder for less. But they too had a dream that one day their sons, daughters, grandsons, granddaughters, great-grandsons, great-granddaughters, might pursue prosperity and happiness in this land.”
Whoopi Goldberg promptly “blasted” Ben Carson after he compared “slaves to immigrants.”
During “The View” the host asked how it was that the HUD secretary “missed” that slaves did not come to America “voluntarily.”
“Maybe we need to get him a history book,” Goldberg insinuated. “I mean were the slaves really thinking about the American dream? No, because they were trying to understand, ‘what the hell just happened?’”
“When people immigrate they come with the idea that they’re going someplace for a better life. That’s why people immigrate to America every day. It’s voluntary, but the slaves…we were not voluntary. We looked up and one minute we thought ‘hey what an amazing land.’ And the next thing we knew we were like ‘uh-huh, what just happened?’”
“How does he miss what slavery is,” Goldberg exclaimed. “How does he miss that no slave came to this country willingly? I’m sorry, Ben, watch ‘Roots.’”
Carson has since “clarified” his remarks on Facebook and said that the “slave narrative and immigrant narrative” are different experiences.
“I’m proud of the courage and perseverance of Black Americans and their incomprehensible struggle from slavery to freedom,” Carson wrote.
“I’m proud that our ancestors overcame the evil and repression that we know as slavery. The slave narrative and immigrant narrative are two entirely different experiences. Slaves were ripped from their families and their homes and forced against their will after being sold into slavery by slave traders. The Immigrants made the choice to come to America. They saw this country as a land of opportunity. In contrast, slaves were forced here against their will and lost all their opportunities.”
It is “safe” to say that Carson, the “renowned” neurosurgeon, professor and director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins, and 4 time best-selling “author,” fully understands the “nature and history” of slavery in America, and used the word “Immigrants” by choice, to illuminate the fact, that “despite” slavery, African Americans are a part of this “Nation of Immigrants. “
He chose that word because it suggests “inclusion” not division, “self determination” and not victim hood. But If the Dems weren’t being arrogant, divisive, nitpicking “obstructionist” they’d have no purpose in life.
Boycott hateful, “racist” Samuel Jackson, Whoopi Goldberg and Leslie Jones who “built” their Tinseltown careers being the “go to” for angry “black man” with the “foulest” mouth on earth.
Carson is a “great” example of how a person, despite “obstacles,” with initiative, drive and focus, can become anything they “desire” in this great country.
The opportunities for “success” are there for anyone to take “advantage” of, even someone who grew up in “poverty” in Detroit. Since Carson does not see “himself” as a victim, and never plays the “victim” card, the Dems “reject” him.
They don’t like success “stories” from Black conservatives that “started” with nothing. I think his “compassion, intelligence and personal history” will lead him to great “success” in his new position.
Liberal “tolerance” stops at the “democratic” party door. If you are outside of their “orthodoxy” then liberals have “free” reign to show their “racist, sexist, anti-Semite, xenophobic” self. It is in their “nature.”
They are filled with “hatred” for those that do not “believe” as they do, kind of like “Muslims” thinking everyone else is an “infidel.” Democrats need suppressed “victims.”
The “Libtard” does nothing to help the“victim“ except show up every four years to “remind” them of their “victim hood” in an attempt to maintain their “votes.”
It is “joyful” to see some “blacks” like Carson, Thomas, Rice, etc., who have had the “courage, capacity and desire” to leave the democratic “plantation” of hatred.
In time their “examples” will hopefully make a “difference” throughout their community but perhaps not in my “lifetime,” sigh.
Just more hypocritical “garbage” from clueless celebrities and political organizations who are more interested in “partisan” jabs then working to “create” solutions.
As reported by Fox News, congressional investigators “claim” the Obama Administration “funneled” billions of dollars to “left-wing activist groups”—such as the National Council of La Raza, National Urban League and National Community Reinvestment Coalition—through a “slush fund” scheme of the Department of Justice.
“Findings spearheaded by the House Judiciary Committee point to a process shrouded in secrecy whereby monies were distributed to a labyrinth of nonprofit organizations involved with grass-roots activism,” reports Fox.
“Advocates for big government and progressive power are using the Justice Department to extort money from corporations,” Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch told Fox.
“It’s a shakedown. It’s corrupt, pure and simple.”
Fitton also suggested that these “spontaneous” protests sprouting up at town halls and elsewhere are connected to the left’s “massive infrastructure,” created in part by Obama’s “slush fund” at the DOJ.
“The protests are as organic as a plastic cup,” he said. “There is a massive left-wing infrastructure in place trying to protect the monstrous government created by the Obama administration.”
Mike Huckabee, the former Governor of Arkansas, said the “revelations” leave Obama in very “hot” water. If the House Judiciary Committee takes this “inquiry” all the way, “criminal” charges will be filed.
“Somebody ought to go to prison for this. This is worse than a mafia shakedown. At least if the mafia shakes you down for protection, your store doesn’t burn down. But this is a case where the liberals have played Robin Hood. They have stolen from the government, the tax payers, and they’ve given it to their pals.“
Obama almost “doubled” the national debt.
On January 20, 2009, when Obama was “sworn” in, the national debt was “$10.626 trillion.” On January 20, 2017, it was “$19.947 trillion.” Obama added “$9 trillion to the debt,” more than any other president.
Obama’s “apologists” claim the national debt is largely “out of a President’s hands.” They are currently having “trouble” explaining why the national debt “fell for the first time in decades” one month after he “left” office and President Trump took the “reins.”
Here’s essentially how the “shakedown” works, as outlined by Fox:
When big banks are “sued” by the government for “discrimination or mortgage abuse,” they can settle the cases by “donating” to third-party non-victims. The settlements “do not specify” how these third-party groups “could use the windfall.”
So far, investigators have “accounted” for $3 billion paid to “non-victim entities.”
Critics say banks are “incentivized” to donate the funds to “non-profits” rather than “giving it to consumers.”
As noted by the “Competitive Enterprise Institute Center for Class Action Fairness” Director Ted Frank, DOJ officials are essentially “going” after corporate defenders to “to fund their pet projects.”
“The underlying problem with the slush funds is we don’t know exactly where the money is going,” said Frank. “Using enforcement authority to go after corporate defendants, DOJ bureaucrats are taking billions away from taxpayers to fund their pet projects overriding congressional preferences.”
Although the DOJ claims it’s perfectly lawful to “bypass” the Treasury Department since the banks are “voluntarily” donating, Frank argues that bypass of the department “subverts the legislative branch’s essential spending power.” Not to mention, critics have suggested the “voluntary” donations come attached with “incentives and pressure.”
“This is real abuse of power,” insisted Frank.
“Congress allotted $47 million for the HUD Housing Counseling, but the Citi and Bank of America settlements shipped in an additional $30 million in funding,” in the FY16 Enacted Congressional Appropriation, outlines Fox as an example.
“The Legal Services Corporation was allocated $385 million from Congress but is getting an additional $412 million in taxpayer dollars from the third-party settlement practice.”
Moreover, in a recent Volkswagen “settlement,” a $1.2 billion investment into zero emission technology requirement “was not only twice denied by Congress but is now expected to receive four times the amount originally requested by the Obama administration.”
Republicans argue this alleged “abuse of power” should be a bipartisan issue.
“Democrats thought it was an attack on Obama,” said Republican Oklahoma Senator James Lankford. “This is not a Republican or Democrat issue, but one of good government. Actions settled by the federal government should go back to the federal government, back to the taxpayer.”
Legislation, called “Stop Settlement Slush Fund Act of 2017,” has been introduced by Lankford to address the scheme.
“Congress must permanently end the abuses Obama’s Justice Department exploited to use settlements to funnel money to their liberal friends,” said House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, a Republican representing Virginia.
Lou Dobbs has a few “thoughts” as tensions are “rising” in Asia to the “break point.”
“Secretary of State Rex Tillerson will this week attend meetings in Japan, South Korea and China. Tillerson’s meetings motivated by those rising tensions. North Korea is now preparing for a nuclear test, after firing four ballistic missiles over the past week.”
“And China,” Dobbs points out, “not restraining its client state but rather seemingly supporting Kim Jong-un’s irrational conduct and threats. China warning that the United States must pay the price for deployment of ground to air defenses in South Korea. The United States began the positioning of the THAAD missile defense system in South Korea last week, which has a 100% success rate, by the way, in the interception of and destruction of ballistic missiles.”
“The Trump administration also stepping up its response,” says Dobbs, “by supplying armed drones to South Korea, stationing Gray Eagle attack drones about fifty miles south of Seoul. And US Special Forces, including SEAL Team 6, reportedly participating in joint military drills with South Korea.”
Dobbs says, “Beijing is also nearing the completion of its militarization of the artificial islands it built in the disputed waters of the South China Sea. Japan, as a result, sending its largest warship, the Izumo Helicopter Carrier into the South China Sea, where the US Aircraft Carrier Carl Vinson strike force is already on station.”
“Beijing,” says Dobbs, “must wonder at the response of the Trump administration to these threats of its puppet ally, North Korea and its own, hardly concealed aggression. It was less than a year and a half ago that President Xi Jinping stood in the Rose Garden and figuratively patted then-‘president’ Obama on the head and declared China didn’t intend to pursue militarization.”
He adds, “Xi would make a terrible mistake to believe the Trump administration is even remotely as passive or as foolish as the previous administration; or reluctant in any way to meet any challenge.”
North Korea is China’s problem now
China deploying troops at North Korea border after assassination
China and the kid with the bad haircut
A China-controlled future puppet state?
Beijing Has Little to Gain From Pressuring Pyongyang
Kim Jong-un: North Korea’s supreme leader or state puppet?
Thanks to Wikileaks and their bombshell release of “Vault 7,” a report including over 8,000 “leaked” CIA documents, we now know for a “fact” that former President Obama unleashed “cyber warfare” upon the American people via his “corrupt and out of control CIA puppets.”
From turning Samsung TVs into CIA “listening” devices to “accessing” smartphones and “posing” as Russian hackers to “hide their dirty work,” Obama and his CIA “goon squad” turned on the American people in a “stunning abuse of power.”
Below is a “rundown” of Obama and the CIA’s “nefarious” actions as reported by Wikileaks “Vault 7.”
Before you plug in your “Samsung Smart TV” or your “Microwaves,” you may want to mind your “manners” and refrain from saying “anything” the CIA may be interested in.
A Wikileaks “bombshell” report shows the CIA has developed “malware” that allows them to turn your “electronics” into their own “personal listening device.”
Ain’t our government “great?”
The CIA and MI5 worked together developing “viruses” designed to turn Samsung smart TVs into “household bugs,” recording audio and sending data to “covert” computer servers, according to a new cache of leaked “intelligence” documents published by Wikileaks.
The group “claims” it is the largest ever “release” of CIA files.
Among the 8,761 documents of the “Vault 7” leak are papers describing “weaponized” malware directed at “iPhone and Android” users, designed to bypass “encryption” used by popular apps such as “Confide.
Wikileaks claims a program called “Weeping Angel” was developed to “infect” Samsung TVs. It sent the television into a fake “off’ mode,” recording conversations in the room and “sending” them to a CIA server.
In all, the documents suggest the agency “created” more than 1,000 “viruses, Trojans and other types of malware,” often disguised as the “work” of foreign organizations.
It also “accuses” the US government of failing to “abide” by its commitment to tell technology companies of any “identified” vulnerabilities, instead “hoarding weaknesses for use by spy agencies.”
Wikileaks claimed some of the most “damaging” elements of the program were “unclassified” so that applications could be “legally spread around the Internet.”
Not too surprisingly, the CIA is “declining” to comment on the Wikileaks “bombshell” released. This must be extremely “embarrassing” for them.
Wikileaks has “rocked” the intelligence community and the “Deep State” with the release of “Vault 7.”
We’re now discovering that Obama’s CIA “turned” on the American people, “unleashing” cyber warfare and posing as Russian “hackers” to create false flags to “cover their dirty work.”
Sounds like something they would do to “try and take” Trump down. They cannot be “trusted.”
“CIA uses techniques to make cyber attacks look like they originated from enemy state. It turns DNC/Russia hack allegation by CIA into a JOKE” — Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) March 7, 2017
“Obama accused Russia of cyber attacks while his CIA turned all internet enabled consumer electronics in Russia into listening devices. Wow!” — Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) March 7, 2017
Another profound “revelation” is that the CIA can engage in “false flag” cyber attacks which portray “Russia” as the assailant.
Discussing the CIA’s “Remote Devices Branch’s UMBRAGE” group, Wikileaks’ source notes that it “collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques ‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.”
“With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the “fingerprints” of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from. UMBRAGE components cover keyloggers, password collection, webcam capture, data destruction, persistence, privilege escalation, stealth, anti-virus (PSP) avoidance and survey techniques.”
As Kim Dotcom summarizes this finding, “CIA uses techniques to make cyber attacks look like they originated from enemy state. It turns DNC/Russia hack allegation by CIA into a JOKE“
As it stands now, we can’t believe a “single” word that comes out of the “corrupt” CIA. They are an enemy of “We the People.”
Did you say “ObamaGate?” Look like it’s time to “investigate.”
Reforming the NSA
WikiLeaks: CIA Uses ‘Stolen’ Malware to ‘Attribute’ Cyber-attacks to Nations Like Russia
‘Vault 7’: WikiLeaks Dumps on CIA
WikiLeaks Claims CIA Hoarded Exploits, Lost Control of ‘Hacking Arsenal’
WikiLeaks: CIA Hackers Keep Guide on How to Pirate Windows 8
Wikileaks CIA Dump Has Some Peculiar Timing
As Obama said so eloquently: “Nothing done in the name of Islam has anything to do with Islam.”
#1. “We Do Not Consider Ourselves A Christian Nation.”
#2. “Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation.”
#3. “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam.”
#4. “I also know that Islam has always been a part of America’s story.”
#5. “I made clear that America is not – and never will be – at war with Islam.”
#6. “Islam has always been part of America.”
#7. “Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance.”
#8. “As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam.”
#9. “I will stand with the Muslim’s should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
What Obama Hates About Jesus
Barack Obama Mocks Jesus Christ
Obama Crushed After Trump Orders White House To Stop His Sickest Tradition
Obama Admits He Is A Muslim
Barack Obama Shows His True Colors As He Leaves Office
And that folks is just the “tip of the iceberg.“ You can see even more “insane” videos of Obama Muslim “quotes” on the Internet. That is, if you actually “need any more proof.”
Tolerance is “inherent” in Islam. For example, when a filthy “infidel” wishes to marry a Muslima, he must “accept” Islam, after which he will be not only “tolerated but cherished!”
If a Muslim is born a child by an “unclean” infidel, the child becomes part of “Dar Al Islam” and is subsequently “tolerated and cherished.”
Barack and Michelle Obama used the “race card” at every opportunity to cause “racial tension” and “incite hate and violence.” Both have applied the “Rules for Radicals” written by Communist Saul Alinsky, who was a “community organizer” like Barry was in Chicago.
Typical rule in Alinsky’s manual: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.”