Archive for barack obama

Global Caliph Obama

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , on June 12, 2017 by andelino

“Caliph” Barack Hussein Obama, the chief “Muslim” civil and religious ruler, “regarded” as the “successor” of Muhammad, “ruled” in America from 2008 until 2016 when he was forced to “abate” the throne.

Not that America isn’t “thrilled” at not having to listen to mind-numbingly “lame” and predictable hypocritical “lectures” from Obama, presented as nuggets of “wisdom” that we simply can’t do “without” and should all incorporate into our “daily” lives.

You’d have to be a real “idiot or a Democrat” not to appreciate that relief. But this “gift horse” doesn’t come “without a cost.”

There seems to be a “pattern” developing, where Caliph Obama is spending much of his time as a “private” citizen of a country still yet to be determined, “outside” of the United States that he “loathes” so passionately.

It’s what one would expect from a “globetrotting” globalist being groomed to be the “Caliph” of the world.

Not long ago Caliph Obama was “vacationing” in France, following his $3.5 million “payday” for doing a metro-sexual “one on one” with his own “cook”  in Milan before “heading” to Tuscany to golf.

But having globalists “launder” money to him for speeches isn’t enough to “sustain” the lifestyle Obama is looking for.

After all, “sustainability” is what all of these UN parasites have been “preaching” for the last decade or so.

It’s time for him and Michelle to get that “foundation” off the ground and flourishing.

The people of Germany have already “demonstrated” through their acceptance of the “invasion” of Muslim that they are “pushovers” for anything anybody wants to “ram” down their throats or anywhere else.

Caliph Obama and Dominatrix Merkel are “planning” exactly that under the false “pretext” of promoting his “foundation’s work.”

Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Castro, Saddam and Mao all had their own names for the “mechanisms” that helped pave the way for their rise to power; “foundation’s work” is as good as any.

According to his favorite “propagandists” at CNN, Merkel will “endorse” the Obama Foundation in a joint “appearance” at the Brandenburg Gate.

Supposedly they’re going to “discuss” the globalist agenda items of the “climate change hoax, public health care and economic inequality.”

“Climate change” gives them a mechanism for global “taxation and control,” as does “health” insurance.

Income “inequality” is the basis upon which they will “transfer” wealth, creating a world “inhabited” by their “slave” class.

CNN pitched it as Obama’s effort to bring his “nonprofit” into the global sphere, implying that it is for some “humanitarian” purposes.

It’s not, it’s for “eugenics, control and authoritarianism on a global scale.”

An Obama Foundation “propagandist” is quoted by the Washington Free Beacon as saying, “He and Mrs. Obama have been pretty clear that the foundation will have a global reach. They want to be really involved in programming throughout the world.”

They’re “programming” people with the “intend” to reach “everyone” and every “wallet” on the planet, just like the “Clinton Crime Family Foundation.”

They “pitched” his efforts to recruit “young and malleable” minds into his “indoctrination” and global force as “trying to inspire young people to create change through his outreach.”

The younger and more “naive” their victims the easier they are to “control.” It takes a “village,” right Caliph Obama?

The promoters of the “get together” described it as a panel “conversation” with Obama, Merkel and some underlings titled, “Being Involved in Democracy: Taking on Responsibility Locally and Globally.”

Sitting alongside German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Caliph Obama lectured the current administration about its “immigration” policy.

While not “mentioning” President Trump by name, Obama made “clear” to whom he was leveling his criticism. “In this new world that we live in we can’t isolate ourselves, we can’t hide behind a wall.”

But that’s “exactly” what Caliph Obama is doing in his Washington, DC and Chicago “homes.”

As Caliph Obama “waxes” eloquent about the supposed “negative” impact of walls on humanity, crews have “completed” the brick and metal wall “surrounding” his home in the tony “Kalorama” neighborhood in Washington, DC.

Caliph Obama’s DC home isn’t the only one “protected” by walls. Chicago neighbors are “begging” Chicago leaders to take down the “barriers” that have been “blocking” their streets.

Leaders at KAM Isaiah Israel, the “synagogue” across the street from Barack Obama’s Chicago “mansion” at 5046 South Greenwood Avenue say the heavily “secured” block in Kenwood should be “reopened” to the public since Caliph Obama is no longer in office.

Neighbors sharing the block with Obama’s Georgian Revival mansion at 5046 S. Greenwood Avenue (center bottom) have spent the last four years under the careful watch of the Secret Service.

Interim Executive Director Debra Hammond said the synagogue at 1100 East Hyde Park Boulevard wants the “gates and barricades” that block Greenwood Avenue at Hyde Park Boulevard “removed” to send a message of “openness and inclusivity.”

“If we could have it the way we wanted it, it would be open at Hyde Park Boulevard,” Hammond told DNAinfo. “We want to be more of a place of sanctuary.”

Photos show the “neighborhood” is still very much “fortified,” despite Obama’s public “opposition” to walls.

Perhaps Caliph Obama “forgot” to tell the Germans, “Walls for me, but not for thee.”

Obama Intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years
Obama – Cruelty, Violence Logical, Natural In Religious Expression, Christianity Not Perfect
Obama Pitches New World Order Globalism With Angela Merkel In Reconfigured Germany
As SWAT teams circle, Obama in Berlin complains about walls
Obama lectures ‘we can’t hide behind a wall’ — from behind a wall!
Brandenburg Barack Reprimands Donald Trump
Wall around Obama’s DC home complete!

How will Britain React

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on June 5, 2017 by andelino

Watching the “weenies” at the U.K.’s “Guardian” react to the Manchester mass-casualty carnage by trotting out the left’s usual meme that “we must not overreact” to the latest atrocity, we may have arrived at a great “clarifying” moment.

Apparently, there is nothing  the “Islamic” terrorists could do that will “provoke” the European left into “defending” the West.  So this will be a very short note.

First, the left, with its “reaction” to Manchester, has lost all “credibility.” Leftists are no longer “relevant,” and should be “treated” accordingly.

Second, Great Britain, in the midst of a “snap election” campaign, has been targeted by the “same folks” who’ve been launching “mass-casualty attacks” on the Continent.

From the reporting, it appears that this was not a “lone wolf” like the guy who attacked Parliament. This was “ISIS” Central.  An appropriate “response is required.

Third, thank God that “Caliph” Barack Obama is “not” president.

So what “should” the Brits and the U.S. do? They should do what the Archangel Barack “would not do” after the Paris and Brussels attacks.

Invoke “Article 5 of the NATO Treaty.”  This was done after 9/11. An attack on one is an attack on all.

Last, Prime Minister May, with President Trump’s “support,” should do what George W. Bush “did not do” after 9/11 and “call” for 100,000 British men to “leap” to the colors and “join” the U.K.’s military.

France’s “new” president should do the “same” with his own “men” and his own “army.”

Enough is enough.  As Mark Steyn wrote:

“All of us have gotten things wrong since 9/11. But few of us have gotten things as disastrously wrong as Theresa May, Angela Merkel and François Hollande and an entire generation of European political leaders who insist that remorseless incremental Islamization is both unstoppable and manageable.

It is neither, and, for the sake of the dead of last night’s carnage and for those of the next one, it is necessary to face that honestly. Theresa May’s statement in Downing Street is said by my old friends at The Spectator to be “defiant“, but what she is defying is not terrorism but reality. So too for all the exhausted accessories of defiance chic: ‘candles, teddy bears, hashtags,’ the pitiful passive rote gestures that acknowledge atrocity without addressing it – like the El-oi in H G Wells’ Time Machine, too evolved to resist the Morlocks.

As I asked around Europe all last year: What’s the happy ending here? In a decade it will be worse, and in two decades worse still, and then in three decades people will barely recall how it used to be, when all that warmth and vibrancy of urban life that Owen Jones hymns in today’s Guardian is but a memory, and the music has died away, and Manchester is as dull and listless as today’s Alexandria. If May or  Merkel has a happier ending, I’d be interested to hear it. If not, it is necessary not to carry on, but to change, and soon, before it’s too late.”

It is clear we are not ready to be “serious” about Islam or the demographic “revolution” in the West.

Much of the “liberal” Western media has spent its time talking about how “they will not divide us” and how “we will stand united” and all of that childish, “vapid” nonsense.

We are “looking” at a West that will have no Western “characteristics” in fifteen to twenty years, “zero.”

In other words, we are talking about the utter “destruction” of the West but the current reaction of our “media and political elite” are that we should “all come together” and this will just “fix its self.”

I am glad that these people weren’t my “science” classmates because during the “water and oil” experiment they would have been yelling “why don’t they just mix and come together.”

And after the “teacher” informed them that “water and oil don’t mix,” they would yell at the teacher  calling him a “racist.”

We are asked to “pretend” like this is normal. That it is “normal” that we will have “terrorist” attacks that “kill” ten, twenty or fifty of people “every so often.”

Sadiq Khan, the Muslim “invader” who was made mayor of Britain, said it was “part and parcel of living in a big city” that you have to be “prepared” for terrorist attacks.

Emanuel Macron, the new President of France, is quoted as saying that terrorism is just “part of our daily lives for the years to come.”

Oh yea that’s perfectly normal isn’t it.

Maybe the people of Europe should “consider” the phrase Americans said when they “engaged” in the Second World War, “praise the Lord, but pass the ammunition.”

Here is a “message” the lads in the RAF “scrawled” on their munitions to ISIS.

Let’s admit: Manchester is the ‘new normal’
Facts don’t care about Islamic terrorists’ feelings
Trump triumphs over terrorists in battle of brands
US Intel officials leaked Manchester bomber’s name
Drive them out: Time to deport known American jihadis

For God’s Sake

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on June 1, 2017 by andelino

With God having made no “definite” commitment to attend the “conclave” with the Pope Francis and Donald Trump, “Globalist” Barack Obama offered to stand in for “The Creator” in Rome, Italy.

With a wide, engaging “grin” and in his deep, “resonant” voice, Barry said: “I volunteer with pleasure!”

When Barry entered the Vatican, the press corps “fell” to their knees on the “prayer rug” each reporter brought to the meeting, “cheering” him on with placards showing an “image” of Donald Trump on which was written “Not My President!”


“I’m leaving for Berlin, Germany right after this meaningful conference folks, to stand in for The Creator who had another function to attend.”

“Globalist” Obama, still acting as the “real” president, rose to wild “yelps, clapping and cheers” from the Press Corps led by CNN and MSNBC, as they chanted in unison again: “Yes, He’s not our president!”

And then the Kenyan national put on a sweat shirt that displayed “RESIST!” with a raised fist, “stumbling” off the podium with his golf clubs to the “green copter” awaiting to fly him to the “Tuscany” golf course.

“See that no one leads you astray. For ‘I am God,’ and I will lead you for God’s sake.”

Saving “souls” is now just so passé. What’s “new and hot” is saving the planet from “Climate Change.”

After eight years of the “oceans receding” and the “planet healing,” Barry is very “disappointed” that there is a “Denier” in the White House.

After arriving  in Berlin to “meet” with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, just hours before she was “meeting” with President Donald Trump at the NATO summit in Brussels, Globalist Barry spoke to a large “crowd” there addressing the case of Muslim migration “for God’s sake.” 

“In the eyes of God, a child on the other side of the border is no less worthy of love … than my own child,” CNN reported.

Known for his “relaxed stance on immigration, Barry continued:

“My guess is that, ultimately, what is going to happen is that everybody is going to have to work a little bit less, and we’re going to have to spread work around more,” describing his view of the “consequences” of technology innovations.

“But that’s going to require a reorganization of the social compact. That requires that we change our mindset about the link between work, income and the value of people in the teaching profession, or healthcare, or certain things that cannot be done by a robot.

One of my goals as globalist is thinking about what will happen 20 years from now, or 30 years from now, when technology will have eliminated entire sectors of the economy.

How do we prepare for that? How do we start creating, or at least having a conversation in our society about making sure that work and opportunities are spread, and that everybody has the chance to live a good and fulfilling life, rather than having a few people who are working 80 or 90 hours a week, and making enormous incomes, and then a large portion of redundant workers that increasingly have a difficult time supporting families. That’s not a sustainable mechanism for democracy and a healthy society for God’s sake.”

The Qur’an states a Muslim can “lie” to infidels to “get” what is needed.

With that “wonderful” speech I can tell Globalist Obama really “cares” for these poor migrant “children, orphans and widows.”

So Barry, now that you are “retired,” I expect you to accept a number “migrants” into your wall “guarded” home, especially some of those “Syrian refugees and MS-13 gang members.”

Don’t forget some desperate “teen gang” members from your “delightful” home town, the south side “slums” of Chicago! After all you know the “mayor” very well. He can help you “locate” some for you!

Come on Barry, what is “taking” you so long! You have lots of “money” and such a “caring” heart!

What’s the holdup “For God’s sake?”

Obama Cites God To Make The Case For Immigration

Meat or Insects

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on May 19, 2017 by andelino

Eric Worrall at Watts Up With That? highlighted in a recent post a study “suggesting” people consume more “insects” as a way to cut “greenhouse gas emissions,” which some scientists believe are “responsible” for causing higher temperatures and all the alleged “harms” resulting from warmer climates.

The study, titled “Could Consumption of Insects, Cultured Meat or Imitation Meat Reduce Global Agricultural Land Use?,” was published on April 22 in the journal “Global Food Security.”

The researchers, all of whom come from Europe or Australia, wrote in their abstract, “Animal products, i.e. meat, milk and eggs, provide an important component in global diets, but livestock dominate agricultural land use by area and are a major source of greenhouse gases. Cultural and personal associations with animal product consumption create barriers to moderating consumption, and hence reduced environmental impacts.”

The researchers wrote one of their “goals” was to determine a way to “reduce” animals’ land use and “greenhouse gas emissions” by examining nutritious alternatives to “eating” animals, such as cows.

“The results suggest that imitation meat and insects have the highest land use efficiency, but the land use requirements are only slightly greater for eggs and poultry meat,” the researchers wrote.

“The efficiency of insects and their ability to convert agricultural by-products and food waste into food, suggests further research into insect production is warranted.”

“We conclude that although a diet with lower rates of animal product consumption is likely to create the greatest reduction in agricultural land, a mix of smaller changes in consumer behavior , such as replacing beef with chicken, reducing food waste and potentially introducing insects more commonly into diets, would also achieve land savings and a more sustainable food system.”

In its report of the researchers’ findings, an “unnamed” writer at Phys.org wrote, “Replacing half of the meat eaten worldwide with crickets and meal worms would cut farmland use by a third, substantially reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.”

Cows have long been a target of “global warming alarmists,” who say they are one of the greatest “contributors” to climate change.

According to a United Nations 2011 report, livestock “methane” emissions, a scientific way of saying “animal farts”, accounted for 39 percent of all “greenhouse gas emissions” from agriculture, which itself made up a large “chunk” of the total emissions.

Even Barack Obama “chimed” in during the “Global Food Innovation Summit” in Milan, Italy were he “warned” the world that more people on the planet were “eating” meat, causing a dramatic rise in “climate” emissions.

During his roughly 100-minute “remarks” for which he received a “reported” $3,000,000, he talked about “himself” 216 times.

Obama said “I” 168 times, “me” or “my” 40 times, and said “we,” “us” or “our” referring to his family “8” times. They definitely got their money’s worth.

Thankfully Barry’s brain didn’t “short circuit” into a stuttering rampage, which “drugs” do when used long term.

“As people want to increase meat consumption, that in turn is spiking the growth of greenhouse emissions coming out of the agricultural sector,” Obama said, pointing to countries that were “consuming” more meat.

The former president “shared” his views about the growing “threat” during a conversation about “food” with his former chef Sam Kass at the food “innovation” summit.

“People aren’t as familiar with the impact of cows and methane,” Obama said, adding that “as people want to increase more meat consumption, that in turn is spiking the growth of greenhouse emissions coming out of the agricultural sectors.”

The amount of “cows,” Obama explained, were contributing to “global pollution,” alluding to the amounts of “methane gas” emissions from cow herds.

“No matter what, we are going to see an increase in meat consumption,” Obama said, pointing to “developing” economies in China, India, Indonesia, and Vietnam.

More “advanced” countries, Obama said, would have to teach people to “have a smaller steak” and explore “reductions” to their meat consumption.

“What it does mean is that we’re also going to have to find ways to produce protein in a more efficient way,” he said.

During the conversation, Obama “argued” with Kass about how many “steaks” he had cooked him. Kass said he probably cooked “thousands of steaks” for the president, but Obama “interrupted.”

“I don’t think, thousands,” he protested. “Well hundreds maybe,” Kass backtracked. “I’ve been cooking for you for 10 years.”

“What is true is that I’m not a vegetarian,” Obama admitted, adding that he “respected vegetarians” but continued to eat meat.

How would you like some “meal-worms and crickets” instead of a “burger” at your Memorial Day barbecue?

Climate change “activists” say humans should start eating “insects” as a way to eventually cut the world’s “meat” consumption by 50 percent.

Doing that, activists “argue,” would greatly reduce “greenhouse gas emissions” by livestock.

The report on Phys.org stated: “Replacing half of the meat eaten worldwide with crickets and meal-worms would cut farmland use by a third, substantially reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, researchers say.”

While consumers’ “reluctance” to eat insects may limit their “consumption,” even a small increase would bring “benefits,” the team says. This could potentially be “achieved” by using insects as ingredients in some “pre-packaged” foods.

Tucker Carlson “weighed” in on his show, calling on “prominent” climate change activists “to go first.”

“If I’m gonna give up grilled meat for worms, I’ll need Leonardo DiCaprio to show the way. When Al Gore starts serving crickets for lunch on his private jet, I’m in,” he said.

Russian President Vladimir Putin gave a “press” conference where he “called out” Barack Obama and the American “mainstream” media in a “brilliant” and much “deserved” way.

Obama: Eating Steaks Contributes to Climate Change
Obama Pitches Alternatives To Meat

From Russia With Love

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , , on April 4, 2017 by andelino

During a press conference, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova dropped a “bombshell” that her country has “damaging” information the Obama administration “asked” them to “keep secret” but they just “might leak it.”

While answering a question about how she sees “the future of Russian-US diplomatic relations in the context of the current atmosphere in Washington,” Zakharova said they have “soured” over the last few years.

She used as her example, the announcement of “details for official visits,” according to an English transcript provided by the Kremlin.

“To tell the truth, over the past few years we’ve seen many strange things happen in Washington in connection with preparations for visits or talks by our foreign ministers. The US Department of State has more than once asked us not to announce planned visits until the last minute. This is not our tradition. We have been operating openly for years, but we have respected the requests we have received from our colleagues in Washington in the past few years.

But what happened after that? First, the US Department of State asked us to keep the planned visit quiet and not to announce it until the last possible minute, until we coordinated the date. We did as they asked. But a day or two later the information was leaked by the US State Department and sometimes by the US administration. Frankly, this put Russia and the media in a strange situation, because they didn’t know who to believe – the official agencies or the many leaks.”

She said the Russian government would be “transparent about such visits.”

“As I said, such cases in our relations with the US Department of State have become a bad tradition over the past few years. So, I can say in response to your question that we will make the date and format of contacts between the Russian and US foreign ministers public after we coordinate them. We won’t keep them quiet.

At this point, I don’t have any information I can share with you. I can say that this visit and such contacts are possible in principle, but it would be premature to talk about time frames.”

She then said if things “continue” on the present course, it may be “damaging” for former President Barack Obama.

“Also, I would like to say that if the practice of leaking information that concerns not just the United States but also Russia, which has become a tradition in Washington in the past few years, continues, there will come a day when the media will publish leaks about the things that Washington asked us to keep secret, for example, things that happened during President Obama’s terms in office. Believe me, this could be very interesting information.”

Our American colleagues must decide if they respect the diplomatic procedure, if they keep their word on the arrangements made between us, primarily arrangements made at their own request, or we create a few very nice surprises for each other.”

I wonder if that “includes” whatever President Obama was talking about with “outgoing” Russian President Dmitri Medvedev?

Medvedev: “I will transmit this information to Vladimir.” pic.twitter.com/1ZtYkM6njd — ZeroPointNow (@ZeroPointNow) March 28, 2017

This alone should have “cost” Obama the election but he was given a “pass” by the lame stream media.

After Obama said he could be more “flexible” he promptly removed the “European Missile Shields” emboldening the Russians to “take” Crimea and “attack” the Ukraine!

Proof that Obama was “always” trying to do as much “damage” to the USA and the free World as possible!

Can you imagine the “headlines this would have made if this was “about” a Trump administration official.

But “because” it is about Barack Obama, the “worst presidents in US history,” the liberal mainstream media “ignores” this story completely.

“Caliph” Obama along with the “criminal” Clinton’s belong in “GITMO” for life!

As long as Obama “loyalists” still hiding in the White House and continue to “leak” Intel, it’s “inevitable” that Russia eventually will “drop a bombshell” about Obama.

Trump Calls for Investigation into Clintons’ Russian Ties
Why No Evidence is Needed to Keep the Trump-Russia Story Alive
The Russia Hysteria
CIA reveals Russian hackers hacked the DNC…and why that doesn’t matter.

Awkward History

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on March 26, 2017 by andelino









In a shocking “move” President Trump is set to declare May 1st global “Red Holocaust memorial day, remembering the 100 million or so murdered by the “Communists, Socialists and Democrats.”



Russia’s Biggest Bank Paid Podesta To Fight US Sanctions
Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank
Podesta Didn’t Register As A ‘Foreign Agent’ When He Represented A Bank With Ties To Russian Spy Agencies
Obama and Russian Ambassador’s Dalliance with Nucleons
Behind the collapse of the ‘Russia hacking’ narrative, is panic spreading in the Obama camp?

Obama’s Lawlessness

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , on March 21, 2017 by andelino

Former President Barack Obama ran his campaign on “change” and said he would “fundamentally transform America.” For eight years he added “action” to his words, and America has “indeed” been transformed, “fundamentally.”

President Donald Trump’s campaign “inspired” support by “opposing” Obama’s transformations.

Candidate Trump said “undoing” what Obama had done would be easy: “He could nullify his executive actions by issuing executive actions of his own.”

When President Trump “got to work” in January, he began “signing” them right away.

But is “reversing” eight years of Obama as simple as signing “executive actions” with the signature “Donald J. Trump”?

Is it as “simple” as a Republican-controlled Congress “repealing laws” passed by the previous Democrat-controlled Congresses?

In reality, Obama made “eight” years of systemic changes: “not only legal and regulatory, but also cultural, moral and psychological.” Some of this “transformation” of America cannot be “reversed.”

Let’s start with “young” Americans. The Obama “Justice Department and Education Department” enforced “policies, regulations and laws” that prevent educators from “disciplining insubordinate” students.

They “argued” that since statistics show that “black” teenagers are disciplined at a “higher” rate than white students, thus American “teachers and administrators” are racist.

Obama’s bureaucracy “coerced” and even “prosecuted” schools into leaving two high school generations “unrestrained and unpunished.” The result is millions of young people have been “educated” to throw off “rules and laws.”

Obama also “attacked” America’s prison system, “accusing” it of systemic racism. He “blamed” the makeup of “jail populations” not on law “breaking,” but on the “law” itself, particularly the “judges and law enforcement officers.”

He “accused” police of “racism” so vile “claiming” that officers often murder a “man” simply because he “is” black.

By the end of Obama’s “second” term, it had become much more common to see people “marching in the streets, trashing public places, beating people on the sidewalks, and rioting in cities like Ferguson and Baltimore.”

Fringe “arguments” received the vocal support of the “highest” office in the country. Eight years on, many more Americans now “mistrust, disrespect and even attack law enforcement officers.”

Many hate the “law” more than they hate the “crime.”

Obama, occupying an office created to “enforce” the law, personally “undermined” the rule of law, in some cases openly “refusing” to enforce laws that his office is specifically “required” to enforce.

His “enforcement” of immigration was “lawless” at best, completely “anti-law” at worst.

Obama gave a presidential “endorsement” to many more issues that “fundamentally” weakened America’s “culture, economy and security.”

He “flung” the doors wide open on the “entitlement” culture and spent hundreds of billions giving away “phones, health care, money” and more. He “hooked” tens of millions more people on “welfare benefits.”

He passed a gargantuan “health-care” law, and the largest “tax” in history, which was a massive federal “overreach” into Americans’ personal lives.

He became the biggest “spender” in world history, “accumulating” twice as much “debt” as all his predecessor and nearly “doubling” the national debt to “almost” $20 trillion.

Can that be “paid” back with “interest” with a “few” signatures?

Obama also “invited” into the White House “Black Lives Matter,” an organization whose website “reveals” that it has as much or more to do with “anti-constitutional socialism and race-baiting.”

He “bathed” the outside of the White House in the colors of the “homosexual/bisexual/transsexual/queer/intersexual/etc.” flag, celebrating the newfound “right” of homosexuals to “marry.”

President Trump has said he is not “interested” in challenging this law, which by “itself” fundamentally “transforms” America.

Obama “successfully” used the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service as “political” weapons. He presided over the “surveillance” of journalists, the mass surveillance of “average” Americans, and the targeted “killing” of American citizens involved in “terrorism.”

His Justice Department “provided” a framework arguing that the “federal government” sometimes has the “legal right to kill Americans without trial,” overseas and at home.

The most fundamental “transformation” Obama accomplished can be summarized in one word: “lawlessness.” The most important American office for enforcing “laws” was occupied by a man who instead enforced his “personal will.

Unshackling the presidency from its “constitutional” limitations is one of the most “dangerous” transformations of all, no matter who “occupies” the Oval Office.

The worst “legacy” of the Obama administration was the “erosion of the rule of law.”

In 2017, America is a “different” nation from what it “was” on Jan. 20, 2009. To sign away some of Obama’s “destructive” policies and laws will be easy, but to “confront” America’s changed “mentality” will not.

To instead “leave it as it is” will be easy; to “transform” it back to the “way it was, much less to make it great,” will not. That’s because the Obama years appealed to an “ugly, destructive and powerful” element: “our lawless human nature.”

The only way to truly “roll back” the Obama years is to change our own “hearts and attitudes” toward law.

Many of you lead “busy” lives and may not have the “time, the ability, or perhaps even the stomach” to watch another “dreadful” speech from Comrade Obama.

As a public service, the speech has been “reduced” to its “bare” essentials to spare you the “pain” of watching his “Castro-like” address.

And who can “forget” Obama’s statements on “illegal” wiretapping’s…

Here is Obama’s “farewell” address:

One final “batch of lies” from our 44th President…

%d bloggers like this: