Praising Communism

In a historic display of anger and frustration, thousands of demonstrators took to the streets in cities and towns across Cuba, calling for an end to the island’s Communist dictatorship. Republican politicians in the United States took this opportunity to condemn communism and send messages of solidarity to the Cuban people. Yet prominent Democrats have been slow to respond to protests against the Communist Party of Cuba. Five days after the protest started, “Fraud-In-Chief” Joe Biden was pressured into denouncing communism as a “universally failed system,” but more radical Democrats faulted the U.S. embargo against Cuba for the unrest and criticized Biden for upholding it.

After the protests began, Sen. Bernie Sanders called for the U.S. to lift its embargo, saying it has “only hurt, not helped, the Cuban people.” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez echoed her mentor’s comments, saying, “The embargo is absurdly cruel and, like too many other U.S. policies targeting Latin Americans, the cruelty is the point. I outright reject the Biden administration’s defense of the embargo. It is never acceptable for us to use cruelty as a point of leverage against everyday people.”

Both Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez are self-described democratic socialists and supporters of the Black Lives Matter movement, so their support for the Communist Party of Cuba is not unexpected. The Democratic Socialists of America’s international committee declared its solidarity with the Cuban government, and the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation issued a statement just days later praising the Communist regime and condemning the U.S. for opposing it.

“Black Lives Matter condemns the U.S. federal government’s inhumane treatment of Cubans, and urges it to immediately lift the economic embargo,” the group wrote in an official statement posted to Instagram. “This cruel and inhuman policy, instituted with the explicit intention of destabilizing the country and undermining Cubans right to choose their own government, is at the heart of Cuba’s current crisis. Cuba has historically demonstrated solidarity with oppressed peoples of African descent, from protecting black revolutionaries like Assata Shakur through granting her asylum, to supporting black liberation struggles in Angola, Mozambique, Guinea Bissau, and South Africa.”

Shakur was a member of both the Black Panther Party and the Black Liberation Army. After killing a New Jersey state trooper in 1973, she fled to Communist Cuba and received political asylum from Fidel Castro. Despite the fact that she is on the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Most Wanted List, Shakur still receives asylum in Cuba today. So Black Lives Matter is praising Cuba for harboring a domestic terrorist and for supporting Communist revolutionaries in various African nations.

This is not the first time Black Lives Matter has publicly declared its support for the Communist dictatorship established by Fidel Castro. In 2016, the group published a eulogy for the recently deceased Castro, saying “We are feeling many things as we awaken to a world without Fidel Castro. There is an overwhelming sense of loss, complicated by fear and anxiety. Although no leader is without their flaws, we must push back against the rhetoric of the right and come to the defense of El Comandante. From Fidel, we know that revolution is sparked by an idea, by radical imaginings, which sometimes take root first among just a few dozen people coming together in the mountains. It can be a tattered group of meager resources, like in Sierra Maestra in 1956 or St. Elmo Village in 2013.”

The Sierra Maestra mountains were where Fidel and Raúl Castro, along with Che Guevara, took refuge in 1956 after returning to Cuba from exile in Mexico. It was from this base that Castro and his followers launched the revolution that ended in the Communist takeover of Cuba. This editorial is comparing Castro’s Communist insurgents to the would-be revolutionaries who met in Patrisse Cullors’s house in St. Elmo Village, California, to found Black Lives Matter in 2013.

Nikole Hannah-Jones, the founder of the debunked “1619 Project,” is also a supporter of the equalizing power of socialism. In an interview with Vox, she said, “If you want to see the most equal, multiracial, it’s not a democracy, but the most equal multiracial country in our hemisphere, it would be Cuba. Cuba has the least inequality between black and white people of any place in the hemisphere.”

Black Cubans are at the forefront of the demonstrations against communism, exposing the lie that the Democratic Socialists of America and Black Lives Matter are about protecting black people. People like Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors and her colleagues are “trained Marxists” who see parallels between their movement and the rise of Castro in Cuba. They are tearing down America’s constitutional system of government and replacing it with communism.

While Black Lives Matter may masquerade as a human rights group, its 13 guiding principles espouse globalism, collectivism, socialism and the destruction of “the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure.” The Movement for Black Lives, the name for the 50 organizations representing the ideology of Black Lives Matter, released a policy statement in 2016 unabashedly calling for collective ownership of resources, banks and businesses; a highly progressive income tax; a guaranteed minimum income; and other planks from Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto.

A poll released by Civis Analytics suggests that up to 26 million Americans participated in protests over the death of George Floyd, suggesting that Black Lives Matter may be the largest protest movement in U.S. history. This movement is being hijacked by Communist revolutionaries—people need to sit up and take note of what is happening to their country.

Marx wrote in Communist Manifesto that communism “abolishes all religion and all morality.” In his poem “The Fiddler,” he expressed a tremendous thirst for destruction: “Till heart’s bewitched, till senses reel: With Satan, I have struck my deal. He chalks the signs, beats time for me, I play the death march fast and free.” Like other 19th-century socialists, Marx employed Satan as a symbol of workers’ revolt against divine authority. Biographer Robert Payne wrote that Marx “had the devil’s view of the world and the devil’s malignity. Sometimes he seemed to know that he was accomplishing works of evil.”

Marx’s son-in-law, Edward Aveling, was a self-described Satanist, as were his radical anarchist colleagues Mikhail Bakunin, William Godwin and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.

It is not as common today for socialists to identify as Satanists, but the late Saul Alinsky dedicated his book Rules of Radicals to “the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom—Lucifer.” And the most influential socialist in America today, Barack Obama, was a teacher of Alinsky’s principles at the University of Chicago. He also wrote a chapter for the book “After Alinsky: Community Organizing in Illinois.”

Like Satan, Marxism promises a utopian society where everyone is equal to God in authority, but it delivers only the worst form of tyranny where the strong rule those weaker than themselves—without mercy and unrestrained by any law. It should come as no surprise that the ideology laid out in the Communist Manifesto has directly caused the brutal murders of more than 100 million people.

“Even those who see there is a real problem in America today don’t recognize its full extent. There is an evil spiritual force that seeks to destroy America. That spirit is working in these young people to fulfill that goal. A great evil spirit is leading these young people to destruction and leading them to accelerate this nation’s death! People are surrendering to this hateful, evil thinking. It is terribly racist—but it is even worse: It is aligned with a satanic will. That is what is truly happening here!”

Marx and Alinsky thought that the devil was only a symbol they could use to rally people against religion, morality, and the biblical concepts of private property (1 Kings 4:25; Micah 4:4; Zechariah 3:10), but the Bible reveals that the devil is a literal spirit being trying to destroy the United States of America.

Democratic Socialists

While America was preparing to celebrate Independence Day, representatives from the largest socialist political organization in the United States met with Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro. According to the television network Telesur, the chairperson of the National Political Committee of the Democratic Socialists of America led a delegation to Venezuela on July 2 to meet Maduro and pledge solidarity with his fight against the U.S. embargo against his country.

This is not a new stance for the Democratic Socialists of America. In 2016, it publicly demanded that Barack Obama revoke sanctions imposed on the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. But this recent show of support is significant because this group is more influential now than it was during the Obama presidency.

Five years ago, the Democratic Socialists of America had 6,000 dues-paying members and only one representative in Congress. Today, it has over 92,000 dues-paying members and four representatives in Congress, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman. The number of democratic socialists in state and local governments has also increased dramatically, from eight to 126 representatives.

Socialism is going mainstream. Including Ocasio-Cortez, Tlaib, Bush and Bowman, 90 representatives in Congress belong to the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which was co-founded in 1991 by self-described democratic socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders. In 1997, the Democratic Socialists of America’s political director, Chris Riddiough, organized a meeting with the Congressional Progressive Caucus to discuss how the two groups might “unite our forces on a common agenda.” The two organizations have remained ideologically close ever since. This means the radical left controls 20 percent of the House of Representatives and 41 percent of the entire Democratic Caucus.

In the early 2000s, leftists in America loved to praise Hugo Chávez’s new socialist regime in Venezuela. But much of this praise ceased after Chávez seized control of all branches of power: executive, legislative, judicial and military. Now, only groups like the Democratic Socialists of America continue to hold up Venezuela as an example for America to follow.

Despite the praise that American socialists like Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez heap on welfare states like Denmark, Norway and Sweden (these Scandinavian nations are largely pro-capitalist in wealth creation and socialist in wealth distribution), the amount of bureaucratic regulation the radical wing of the Democratic Party is proposing is far more akin to Venezuela than Scandinavia.

This is a primary reason why the Democratic Socialists of America want the U.S. to lift its embargo on Venezuela. They defend Venezuela’s Bolivarian Revolution like Black Lives Matter defends the Cuban Revolution. Both of these groups believe U.S. socialists need to join forces with foreign socialists to tear down America’s constitutional government.

In its purest form, socialism means that the government controls the entire economy. The government owns not only the postal service, it owns all businesses—without competition. Most modern American socialists say the government doesn’t have to literally own all businesses as long as it heavily regulates and taxes them. People like Sanders emphasize that they are democratic socialists, meaning this powerful government would be voted in by a majority of the people.

But as the Venezuelan people found out the hard way, democratic socialism has a tendency to morph into authoritarian socialism very quickly. It is like former U.S. President Gerald Ford said, “A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.” Democratic socialism in Cuba, Venezuela and numerous other counties turned into a nation-size horror story—not because people didn’t get to vote, but because government officials ignored or did away with laws that limited the government’s power and protected individual rights.

What Karl Marx called the “dictatorship of the proletariat,” American Founding Father John Adams called the “tyranny of the majority.” Marx was an atheist, while Adams believed in the Bible. And although Adams might not have known it, the Bible shows that the modern descendants of ancient Israel include the United States. The Prophet Isaiah prophesied that these modern Israelites would become sick in their reasoning and faint in their hearts (Isaiah 1:4-7). He also prophesies that their nation would be laid desolate by civil war. How could a dramatic prophecy like this be fulfilled? How could the most powerful and prosperous nation in human history fall into such a terrible fate as this?

One reason Americans will clash with one another is over this issue of government control. By its very definition, big-government socialism is directly opposed to small-government constitutionalism. Socialism is based largely on atheism, and the American Constitution is based largely on the Bible. Socialists are gathering strength within America and attempting to forge alliances with socialists outside America. The goal is to fundamentally transform the country.

What most people don’t understand about “democratic socialism” is that its aim of socialism in the United States is to overthrow its constitutional form of government—by violence if necessary. Socialists usually downplay this, but the protests and riots occurring across America today are not really against Donald Trump, or Republicans, or the police; they are really against America’s constitutional form of government.

How widespread and how violent will this movement get? The history of socialism provides the chilling answer!

Eviction Moratorium

“Rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city—except for bombing.”

“Fraud-In-Chief” Joe Biden is now essentially confiscating property from its legal owners. On August 4, Biden’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention extended a moratorium on evictions. If a tenant refuses to pay his rent, this decree states that the owner of the home cannot evict him, even if the owner needs that rent money to pay his own mortgage.

The original eviction moratorium was imposed by Congress last year as part of a law that tried to soften some of the effects of record unemployment due to government-imposed lockdowns. Now, jobs are plentiful, so this measure is not needed. More importantly, Biden and the CDC bureaucrats have no constitutional authority to do this. So why are they forcing it through?

Biden and the radical left are consolidating their power. They are weakening and bankrupting middle-class Americans, worsening the divisions in our society, and moving us away from the rule of law and toward the rule of whoever grabs power.

The original eviction moratorium was a violation of private property rights and therefore unconstitutional. But at least it had a veneer of legitimacy since it was implemented not by executive branch bureaucracy but through a law passed by the representatives of the American people in Congress. It was contested all the way to the Supreme Court, but Justice Brett Kavanaugh weakly sided with Chief Justice John Roberts and the three other liberals to uphold it. He tried to have it both ways by saying that he would not uphold the moratorium again after it expired on July 31 unless it was in a law passed by Congress. Now the court gets to watch Biden and those behind him as they grind away the rule of law even more.

The radical leftists are replacing the rule of law with the rule of their will! “Flip Flop” Fauci is the science, and radical Democrats are the law.

Even the leftist Washington Post admits this eviction moratorium is illegal. Biden knows that he and the federal bureaucracy are grabbing powers that the Constitution does not grant them. He admitted as much at a press conference, saying, “The bulk of the constitutional scholarship says that it’s not likely to pass constitutional muster. But there are several key scholars who think that it may and it’s worth the effort. At a minimum, by the time it gets litigated, it will probably give some additional time while we’re getting that $45 billion out to people who are, in fact, behind in the rent and don’t have the money.”

What a statement! This is the man in the White House admitting publicly that he governs in ways that likely violate the Constitution, but he pushes ahead as long as he can get away with it before the courts can make an official ruling.

You now live in an America where a “Dictator-In-Chief” of questionable legitimacy has decreed a modern-day Quartering Act forcing you to pay the bills for other people who refuse to pay—even if it bankrupts you. If the radicals can violate this constitutional principle, what principle is off limits? When you can’t appeal to the highest law in the land, you are left to appeal to the will of tyrants.

You have to ask yourself: What is coming next? Will this administration suddenly get its fill of destroying the Constitution and the rule of law and then start building it back up again? Will it suddenly start giving up the power it has seized and return it to the people? Will it suddenly respect the rights of individuals, like the small-scale landlords it is bankrupting? Or does it have its sights set on the last remaining constitutional principles still intact?

You can see the answer in the radical-left progressives in the Democratic Party who pushed for this specific moratorium extension. Mississippi Representative Cori Bush, a member of the so-called “squad” of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, staged a sit-in on the U.S. Capitol steps to pressure Biden into extending the moratorium. This stunt and other pressure appear to have worked.

Biden, a 48-year career politician and former vice president, learned next-level constitutional violation from his boss, Caliph Barack Hussein Obama. As president, Obama regularly violated the constitution. He regularly seized power that our law did not give him. He abused his power in the Fast and Furious scandal when the government intentionally smuggled firearms to drug cartels. He decreed that he would not enforce parts of immigration law he did not like. He forced through ObamaCare. He conducted massive and illegal surveillance. He appointed federal bureaucrats without approval from Congress. He sent the military into Libya without consulting Congress.

His Department of Justice introduced a rationale for killing United States citizens with drone strikes. He violated Americans’ free speech, freedom of the press, due process and other constitutional rights. When Obama wanted to do something unconstitutional, he just did it. He did not worry about the consequences. He did so many blatantly unconstitutional things during his presidency that the Supreme Court—even with four leftist justices—ruled against his administration unanimously 44 times, far more than any president in history. Yet he kept pushing. Now he keeps pushing, through his former vice president.

Practically every constitutional scholar says the government cannot force people to let tenants live on their land for free, but Cori Bush slept in front of the Capitol with a bag of Doritos like a homeless person for four nights, so Biden instructed the CDC to extend the moratorium. This is all pure theater to convince Americans to surrender their private property rights.

It is shocking how brazen the Biden administration has become. Not long ago, Democrats still tried to find some loophole to justify their unconstitutional power grabs. But with this extended eviction moratorium, they are openly declaring it is unconstitutional and they don’t care. “The eviction moratorium is one of the most important stories of the covid-19 lockdowns but also one of the least covered, partly because its effects are so diffuse and partly because the left doesn’t want to draw undue attention to its evisceration of property rights under the guise of public health,” wrote John Daniel Davidson at the Federalist.

“But the way all this has gone down illustrates a deeply disturbing reality about the Democrats running the pandemic response in Washington: They’re lawless, and as the pandemic drags on, they’re becoming bolder about it. It should be clear by now that whatever else is constraining the Biden administration and Democrats in Congress, it isn’t the law. The law, for now, is whatever they say it is.”

As long as the eviction moratorium is in place, the government controls who gets to live on private property. Cori Bush claims the government must do this to help the poor, but this will only make the poor more numerous by crushing hundreds of thousands or millions of middle-class landlords.

The Brookings Institution estimates that “40 percent of residential property units are owned by individual investor landlords. Among those owning residential investment property, roughly a third are from low- to moderate-income households; property income constitutes up to 20 percent of their total household income.” The bigger landlords in America, like Bill Gates, will be able to weather this moratorium and perhaps even profit from the losses of small “mom and pop” landlords.

Swedish economist Assar Lindbeck once wrote, “In many cases rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city—except for bombing.” When you let people live someplace for below market price, new home construction stops, housing shortages start, and societal problems worsen.

The Democrats pride themselves on being the party of the poor, so they are now pulling out all the stops to obliterate middle-class people, who don’t need them as much, and multiply the number of poor people. America is coming to resemble a Communist dictatorship, where a small clique of wealthy central planners makes decisions for the impoverished masses dependent on their will.

“Actually, the Communist Party is not a mere political party in the sense that Americans think of the term. It is a ruthless, totalitarian dictatorship. It is run with absolute power by a few men at the top, all of whom are completely subservient to one man who is a dictator-absolute! This one-man dictatorship is supposed to be necessary because there are many different interpretations of the Marxist philosophy. Therefore, to prevent division, they must have a supreme interpreter.”

Caliph Barack Obama was a self-avowed Marxist in college. His administration tried to govern America like a Communist dictatorship as much as possible. Now “Fraud-In-Chief” Joe Biden is continuing his work by trying to crush middle-class landowners out of existence and create a huge lower class completely dependent on the government.

Anyone who knows anything about history, politics, or economics can see that America is in bitter affliction today.

Infrastructure Deal

The United States Senate passed the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure deal. The 2,700-page bill had the backing of 19 Republicans, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. The group voted to end the debate on the bill early to allow quicker passage.

The Republican RINO’s supporting the bill are claiming a victory, as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act is a greatly reduced version of the original $3.5 trillion budget proposed by the Biden administration. Republican supporters claim Biden’s plans for “human infrastructure” spending to expand climate change actions, education, child care and Medicare benefits are mostly gone from the bill. But the Democrats are rushing the bill through the Senate because this is only the first step in their plan to spend trillions of dollars.

Republican Sen. Kevin Cramer indicated that only $450 billion is being spent on “hard” infrastructure, like roads and bridges. The other $800 billion is being spent on climate change initiatives, clean energy research, massive government expansion into the energy network, and sweeping government regulations against motor vehicles. The bill is actually a Trojan horse for the agenda of the radical left to transform America.

The details of the bill reveal that the Infrastructure Deal is deceptive. Despite claiming to be bipartisan, key Republican supporters of the bill happen to have funding for special projects in their districts, such as $50 billion for a dam in Sen. Mitt Romney’s district and money to repair the Alaska Highway in Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s district.

Below are some highlights from the pending bill:

• $73 billion to move from fossil fuels to clean energy
• $21 billion for environmental remediation
• $7.5 billion in electric charger infrastructure; priority given to rural and low-income areas
• $5 billion for zero- to low-emission buses and $5 billion for adoption of zero- to low-emission buses
• $1 billion for clean hydrogen electrolysis program
• $8 billion for regional clean hydrogen hubs (network of hydrogen producers and consumers)
• $3.2 billion for electric battery development
• $3.2 billion for electric battery recycling
• $3.5 billion on carbon capturing
• $2 million for integrating solar, wind and hydro power.

The bill includes sections on the “promotion of women in the trucking workforce,” designing motor vehicles to measure blood alcohol levels before driving, and safety research on limousines.

Although many of Joe Biden’s original climate change and social programs were not included, the Republicans compromised enough to allow billions for programs resembling the Green New Deal. It is the first trillion-dollar step toward radically transforming the United States’ economy. The Wall Street Journal called it “a major down payment on President Biden’s Green New Deal.”

President Donald Trump issued a statement, saying: “This is not an infrastructure bill; this is the beginning of the Green New Deal.”

The Green New Deal was radical legislation put forward by “Barmaid” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in 2019 that aimed to make the U.S. economy 100 percent reliant on “clean” energy, eliminate poverty, change the diet of Americans to reduce the number of cows, and implement more public ownership of companies. The idea of the bill was favored by many radical liberals but rejected by conservative Republicans, especially by President Trump.

The Green New Deal would mean the collapse of many of the key industries that give the U.S. its economic power. It would also commit America to relying on unproved and unreliable clean energy technology. The Green New Deal was shrouded in climate change language, but was a bid to legislate the communist transformation of America. That is the real goal of the radical left and their climate change agenda.

Such a piece of legislation would be very difficult to pass transparently. Instead, radical lawmakers hide the agenda into other legislation, such as in the latest Infrastructure Act. This is hardly new: Caliph Barack Obama stuffed $90 billion of investment in clean energy into the 2009 stimulus act. It is easy to hide such policies when the legal document is thousands of pages long and Congress votes on it before even reading through the contents.

Billions of dollars are about to be authorized to begin moving this radical agenda forward. But the Infrastructure Deal is actually a Trojan horse for far worse legislation. The bill is paving the way for the passing of the Democrats’ radical $3.5 billion infrastructure plan.

The bipartisan infrastructure bill is part one of a two-phase plan to invest trillions of dollars to transform America. The Democrats made the infrastructure bill “bipartisan” and were willing to “compromise” to smooth the way for phase two, which does not require Republican approval.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer intends to pass the rest of the $3.5 trillion through a process called reconciliation. Using reconciliation would allow the Democrats to pass the budget without needing the 60 Senate votes that are normally required. Even the filibuster cannot stop reconciliation.

This $3.5 trillion “Build Back Better” program devised by the Biden administration was agreed upon in a closed-door negotiation between the White House and the Democratic budget committee. CNBC reported that the agreement had the following:

• Create a national comprehensive paid family-and-medical-leave program.
• Fund free universal preschool for all 3- and 4-year-olds.
• Fund free community college for all students, expand the total amount of Pell Grants, and increase the maximum individual award.
• Expand access to the summer EBT program, which helps some low-income families with children buy food outside the school year.
• Extend the $1.9 trillion covid stimulus plan’s provision lowering health insurance premiums for those who buy coverage on their own.
• Extend the child tax credit expansion that was included in the covid relief bill.

The bill also contains money for clean energy programs, many of which were cut from the bipartisan infrastructure deal during earlier negotiations with Republicans.

These include tax incentives for clean energy and electric vehicles, a Civilian Climate Corps program for young people and energy-efficient building weatherization and electrification projects.

The details of how long the programs will last, and how many billions will be allocated to each program, have not yet been released. But based on how glutted the infrastructure bill was with climate change programs, this agreement may well bring out part two of the Green New Deal. It threatens to massively expand dependence on government social programs and aggressively push for the transformation of the American economy from fossil fuels to “clean energy.”

This is the closest the radical left has gotten to achieving its goal of transforming America’s economy. Ultimately, only 8.9 percent, or $450 billion out of $4.7 trillion, will go to roads, bridges and ports.

Then there is the problem on how to fund this radical agenda. Only $650 billion is pre-approved funds. The rest will need to be financed somehow. One of the ideas by “Fraud-In-Chief”  Biden is to raise corporate income tax from 21 percent to 28 percent.

Other methods include gathering unused covid relief money, using the money generated by the various programs, and asking the Internal Revenue Service to be more strict in enforcing tax laws. However, none of these ideas come close to raising $4 trillion.

In reality it will be financed through higher taxes, or the government will need to print money to fund its own budget.

Biden’s Bloodthirsty Hounds

Fraud-In-Chief Joe Biden’s renegade dog Major could be primed to unleash a reign of terror following the death of Champ, the elder and much-better-behaved German Shepherd widely believed to be the only thing keeping the vicious Major at bay. 

Experts largely agreed that Champ, who died at the age of 13, was a good boy. But even his statesmanlike demeanor was not enough to stop the three-year-old Major from attacking government employees and defecating inside the White House. With Champ out of the picture, there’s no telling what Major will do next.

“As the beta dog in the White House, Major stuck to biting park rangers,” said Dr. Patrick Ames, director of the Weller Institute of Canine Psychology. “Now that he’s the alpha, we should expect a much more aggressive streak to emerge,” Ames told the Washington Free Beacon. “There will be blood.”

The Biden’s sent Major to Delaware for “training” in early March after the dog attacked a member of White House security. He “returned” to Pennsylvania Avenue in mid-March, only to attack a National Park Service employee days later. The injury, which the First Lady’s office described as a “nip,” was severe enough to require medical attention.

Some believe Major’s aggressive nature casts a concerning light on Champ’s untimely demise.

“As with authoritarian leaders and Mafiosi, German Shepherds have been known to claw their way to the top by any means necessary,” said Becca Davis, senior fellow at the Schneider Center for Alsatian Power. “Major wouldn’t be the first Deutschlander to engineer a contemporary’s demise in order to consolidate power.”

Nor would it be Major’s first attempt at a White House coup. In November 2020, then-president-elect Biden fractured his right foot while “playing” with Major after “getting out of the shower.” While the AARP reported that falls and fractures are common in men of Biden’s advanced age, sources close to the matter tell that the “incident” was far from playful.

“Look, the man rides his Peloton every single day,” said the source, who wished to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation. “Do you really think he’d just fall playing with a dog? Wake up! Something funny’s going on here.”D.C.’s most prominent canines are scrambling to respond to the shifting power dynamic in the White House.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D., N.Y.) French bulldog Deco is holed up in her luxury Navy Yard apartment, leaving only for Tesla trips to the neighborhood Whole Foods.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D., Mass.) golden retriever Bailey, best known for stealing strangers’ burritos, was recently found to be 1/64th German Shepherd and is reportedly trying to secure an alliance with Major.

Truman and Buddy Buttigieg, known sycophants who congratulated Champ and Major on Twitter after Biden’s election, did not return a request for comment.

Truman and Buddy Buttigieg

Not everyone in Washington is worried about Major’s untimely rise to “hound” power.

“Champ was stuck in the past, but Major has all four paws pointed toward the future,” said Troy Beauregard , senior fellow in Siamese cat studies at the Quincy Institute. “We’re optimistic that Major will push the Biden administration to a more prudent position on U.S.-China relations.”

At press time, Major was last seen strolling the grounds of the Naval Observatory and discussing the 2024 presidential election with cackling Kamala “Ho” Harris.

The Woke Wealthy

Why Are the Wealthy ‘Woke’?
By Richard Palmer 

What do Nike, Pepsi, Lego, Disney, L’Oreal, KFC, Pfizer, Comcast, FedEx, Home Depot, Verizon, Google, Starbucks, Papa John’s, Coca-Cola, Morgan Stanley and Deloitte all have in common? They are giant, hard-to-ignore businesses. What’s more: “They have all supported Black Lives Matter, the LGBT movement or the racial justice movement—or all three.”Meanwhile, their executives travel the world in private jets, lecturing people about the dangers of climate change. Organizations such as Davos and the World Economic Forum promote programs of thinly disguised communism. Billionaires donate to radical politicians like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

If you want to avoid giving your dollars to companies that support radical-left causes, good luck. More and more big businesses and big businessmen are pushing the “woke” agenda. Aren’t corporations supposedly right wing? Why have so many moved so far left?

The impact of big business and big businessmen on our society is enormous. They are playing a leading role in driving the world down this road. The Bible has a lot to say about the decline in modern society’s moral standards. It discusses our politics and politicians. Thus, it is unsurprising that it also has a lot to say about our modern businessmen.

Money. Part of the reason for this political shift left in the business realm is self-interest. In general, businesses try to appeal to the relatively young. If young people have a job, they likely have more disposable income than a pensioner, and if they become loyal to your brand at age 20, they have many years of purchasing ahead. The 2020 Pew Party Identification Survey of 12,000 registered voters found that 54 percent of Millennials (ages 24 to 39) lean Democrat, whereas only 38 percent lean Republican.

It’s no coincidence, then, that businesses that have shifted furthest to the left have the youngest customers. For example, people under age 34 make up 43 percent of Nike’s business; 89 percent of Starbucks customers are under age 40.

Businesses also tend to appeal to urban consumers. Those in big cities visit Starbucks more often. And 62 percent of urban-registered voters lean Democrat, compared to just 31 percent Republican. The New Republic wrote that businesses shifting left are “just opening their eyes to how important political involvement is to their profits.”

Young, urban workers are not just target customers, they are also target employees. Businesses competing to hire young people entering the workforce shift politically left to increase their appeal. But some brands, like Gillette, have moved left even against the preferences of their target consumers. Why?

Appeasement. Leftists are working hard to politicize the marketplace, aggressively targeting businesses that transgress their standards. In today’s political climate, those on the right have little interest in persecuting businesses. So for businesses, it’s the left they need to appease. They aren’t so keen on left-wing ideas such as high taxation—so they promote the ideas that hurt them little.

“Corporate activism on social issues isn’t in tension with corporate self-interest on tax policy and corporate stinginess in paychecks,” wrote Ross Douthat in the New York Times. “Rather, the activism increasingly exists to protect the self-interest and the stinginess—to justify the ways of CEO’s to cultural power brokers, so that those same power brokers will leave them alone (and forgive their support for Trump’s economic agenda) in realms that matter more to the corporate bottom line.”

Douthat called the new state of affairs “the Peace of Palo Alto, in which a certain kind of virtue-signaling on progressive social causes, a certain degree of performative wokeness, is offered to liberalism and the activist left preemptively, in the hopes that having corporate America take their side in the culture wars will blunt efforts to tax or regulate our new monopolies too heavily.”

Does all this sound a bit too cynical? Consider the left-wing causes big business supports. When did you last see one of these companies stand up for LGBT rights in Iran? Or to speak out against slavery in China? Doing the latter would hurt their supply chains. So Nike, Apple and Coca-Cola lobbied Congress to allow them to continue to use Chinese concentration camp inmates.

Pharmaceutical giant Gilead sponsors homosexual pride parades—while charging over $2,000 a month for an anti-HIV drug. Signaling their support for the LGBT movement is much cheaper than lowering the price of a drug that would predominantly help those in that community. Look at just how targeted these supposedly altruistic social efforts are, and it’s not hard to recognize the monetary motivation behind them.

Big Regulation. There’s another reason for big business to support radical-leftist causes: “Big business and the radical left both love big government.” Left-wing politicians continually publicize the fiction that business hates regulation. True, your local accountant, baker, electrician, hardware store owner and restaurateur all hate regulation. But not big business. Why? Big businesses can afford to hire lobbyists to shape regulations. They can hire experts that help them ensure compliance with the most complex and labyrinthine of red tape. And if a government regulator comes after them, they can hire lawyers and buy influence to push back. But all these options are far out of reach for small businesses. Regulation also stops potential competitors before they ever get started.

The upshot is, the more regulation, the less competitive the market becomes for the corporate giants. So even in countries known for being “free market” and “free enterprise,” big business is devoted to big government. The total money spent by registered lobbyists rose from $2.4 billion in 1988 to a peak of $3.5 billion in 2009 during Barack Obama’s first year in office (figures adjusted for inflation). And this was just the official, registered spending.

On average, an estimated $3.7 million is spent lobbying each member of Congress each year. This lobbying creates a lucrative revolving door. Ex-political advisers can make a lot of money selling their services to businesses, helping them navigate the laws they just created. Here’s one case in point: Jake Sullivan helped President Obama negotiate the Iran deal. He then got a job helping big business trade with Iran, using his intimate knowledge of the deal he helped craft. Now, Sullivan is back in politics as President Joe Biden’s national security adviser.

At times, industries lobby to have regulations put in place that serve no benefit to customers, but which earn businesses tremendous profit. As the government encroaches deeper into more and more areas of our lives, more of these businesses stand to benefit.

Faking a Popular Movement. But not all business support for the leftist agenda comes from cynical self-interest. Many, especially among the super-rich, appear to be true believers. So they bring to bear their wealth, influence and experience in shaping governmental policy. Roslyn Fuller tracked how this works for her article “The Billionaire Takeover of Civil Society.” She zoomed in on one individual: “EBay billionaire Pierre Omidyar.” He funds a huge network of nonprofits, none of which give any clear indication of being related to Omidyar or to each other. They have names like the Democracy Fund, Healthy Democracy and the MacArthur Foundation.

Fuller wrote, “If one accepts what ‘givers,’ like Omidyar et al, say, it becomes apparent that rather than participating in traditional acts of charity, like founding a hospital for the needy, they are attempting to engage in ‘social engineering’—that is, using their resources to artificially change the structure of society to what they think it should be. If successful, this would amount to an extreme circumvention of democracy, utilizing money not just to win elections, but to substitute paid or subsidized content for actual support, and thereby flip an entire political culture on to a different track by amplifying some voices and drowning out others.”

One group that receives funding from Omidyar, the “Sunrise Movement”, describes its plan to “take over the entire United States and all the institutions in it.” It “moved activists into ‘dorm-style Sunrise Movement Houses for three to six months’ in order to create leaders who had a deep level of commitment ‘for everything that would come afterwards.’” These leaders are trained to turn more people to the cause until they reach a critical mass.

“On one level, it is great that young people are taking part in politics,” Fuller wrote. “But on another level it is incredibly fake. The youthful participants aren’t so much being empowered as instrumentalized. After all, they are part of the portfolio of an investment fund that is using them to ‘shift power,’ with part of the strategy being to shame politicians for not being nice enough to hysterical children.”

But Omidyar doesn’t just fund activist groups. He funnels money into “research organizations” that describe themselves as “independent” or “nonprofit.” You presume them to be groups of scientists doing studies, but look deeper and you find that they are firms full of public relations managers and strategy directors.

Some of these “research organizations” produce “sample op-eds” that you can use to write your own, complete with facts and stats backing up the point you want to make. No wonder so much of the media sounds the same.

In addition to this, these different groups work together. For example, a billionaire-funded “independent research institute” publishes a study on “fake news.” The study recommends an “independent” fact-checking group. It turns out that the fact-checker is funded by the same billionaire—a fact it does not disclose.

The desire to reshape society is now commonly talked about by the super-rich. The World Economic Forum famously started talking about the “Great Reset.”

Klaus Schwab, one man pushing hard for this “reset,” writes in Covid-19: The Great Reset: “At the time of writing (June 2020), the pandemic continues to worsen globally. Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal. The short response is: never. Nothing will ever return to the ‘broken’ sense of normalcy that prevailed prior to the crisis because the coronavirus pandemic marks a fundamental inflection point in our global trajectory.” This man sees the disruption to all of our lives this past year as progress toward some twisted socialist utopia.

Backing Biden. It’s no surprise to see many in business acting on their commitment to reshaping society by backing Joe Biden for United States president. In October 2020, CNBC wrote that the Democrats had “crushed” Republicans in fund-raising, “fueled, at least in part, by Wall Street executives.”

In Time’s shocking admission of election interference, “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election,” the author described the role big business played in the most recent elections: “There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEO’s. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans. The pact was formalized in a terse, little-noticed joint statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and AFL-CIO published on Election Day. Both sides would come to see it as a sort of implicit bargain—inspired by the summer’s massive, sometimes destructive racial-justice protests—in which the forces of labor came together with the forces of capital to keep the peace and oppose Trump’s assault on democracy.”

Business leaders were worried about “economy-disrupting civil disorder,” wrote Time. They reached out to radical left-wing groups to ensure the mob got what it wanted. This approach kicked into overdrive after the January 6 “insurrection.” Stripe stopped processing payments for the campaign. American Express and JPMorgan Chase said they would no longer donate to candidates who supported the “insurrection” or voted against confirming President Biden’s victory in the Electoral College. An insider reported that Goldman Sachs had a similar, but quieter, policy. Deutsche Bank announced plans to distance itself from President Trump.

Then, as Biden chose his administration, his links with the radical left and big business became even clearer. BlackRock manages more assets than anyone in the world: the equivalent of $8.7 trillion. Bloomberg characterizes it as the “fourth branch of government.” As the government prints money to keep the economy afloat, BlackRock is an essential partner, managing that cash.

The company has a revolving door relationship with the Obama-Biden administration. BlackRock investment executive Brian Deese was a senior adviser to President Obama. He now leads the National Economic Council under Mr. Biden. Adewale Adeyemo was Obama’s senior international economics adviser, then chief of staff to BlackRock’s chief executive and is now deputy treasury secretary for Mr. Biden. Michael Pyle who worked in the Obama administration, has become BlackRock’s global chief investment strategist and will now be chief economic adviser to Vice President Kamala Harris. More than a dozen people went from the Obama administration to BlackRock.

No business has ever had this level of influence in the United States Treasury, not even Goldman Sachs. Even some on the left are concerned with the level of power BlackRock now has. “BlackRock needs to be broken up and regulated,” director of research at the American Economic Liberties Project Matt Stoller said. “BlackRock CEO Larry Fink knows this, so he’s been storing hack Democrats on ice so they can go into the Biden administration and make sure that doesn’t happen.”

BlackRock chairman Larry Fink is an enthusiastic Democrat. In January 2017, he sent an open letter to over 1,000 CEO’s urging them to “respond to broader social challenges.” He encouraged them to follow the examples of businesses that cut ties with the National Rifle Association and praised examples like Wal-Mart and Dick’s Sporting Goods, which responded to a mass shooting by quickly announcing policies against selling guns to customers under 21.

As a business, BlackRock will support radical-left projects when it suits them. They made a big show of their plan to stop investing in any company that makes more than 25 percent of its revenue from coal. They are less proud of the fact they are the world’s largest investor in fossil fuels—due to their heavy investment in the oil industry, though, interestingly enough, not in the Keystone Pipeline.

But these close ties to government have also brought Fink great returns. Since 2004, his company has hired at least 84 former government or central bank officials. That is how you become the fourth branch of government. And once you’re in, all kinds of doors open up. Ex-BlackRock executives are big fans of trade with China. And with Biden in office, BlackRock is readying some major deals with Beijing.

All Forecast. The radical left has the support of big government, big media, Big Tech and also big business. Much has been written extensively about how the Bible prophesied the rise of the radical left. So it’s not surprising that scriptures have a lot to say about the “woke” wealthy.

In the book of Amos 2, which is an end-time book for the people descended from ancient Israel, today notably America, it states, “Amos decried the social injustice, the oppression of the poor, and the lack of any moral or ethical values on the part of the rich and powerful.” According to Amos, the spokesman of God, “Israel was a violent, oppressive and exploitative society. The poor had to sell themselves into slavery to pay off trivial debts. The rich falsified weights and measures and traded dishonestly. Even the courts, the last bastion of hope for the poor, were corrupt. Judges were bribed to cheat the poor out of what little they had. In fact, Israel was no longer capable of acting with justice. Truth and honesty were now hated.”

How much of this appalling behavior do we see today? Businesses manipulate the system to get ahead. Our entire economic system is built on encouraging people to buy what they cannot afford and to ensnare themselves in debt. Meanwhile society goes deeper and deeper into practices abhorred by God. Isaiah 57:5 describes our people today: “You burn with lust among the oaks and under every spreading tree; you sacrifice your children in the ravines and under the overhanging crags.”

Today we sacrifice our youth spiritually when we give them no uplifting vision. We sacrifice them to sexual lust and fornication. The Internet alone does $10 billion to $13 billion worth of business in pornography every year just in America! It is the most profitable online business. We also sacrifice our children to demoniac music, drugs and greed. This is done even before our youth are taught to use their minds! They get so hooked on coveting that they never even learn about the wondrous potential of God-like minds!”

Now businesses are going along with or supporting a movement that destroys our children’s future. It fills them with warped ideas about marriage and family, destroying their potential to have a happy life and making it much harder for them to have a relationship with their heavenly Father.

How do the “woke” wealthy respond to this affliction? God condemned them as those who “You lie on beds adorned with ivory and lounge on your couches. You dine on choice lambs and fattened calves. You strum away on your harps like David and improvise on musical instruments. You drink wine by the bowlful
and use the finest lotions, but you do not grieve over the ruin of Joseph.” (Amos 6:4-6).The modern descendants of Joseph in America are being afflicted. But the “woke” wealthy are comfortable and unconcerned.

God doesn’t merely condemn those who actively support this affliction; He condemns those who tolerate it, who go along for the sake of a quiet life or for the sake of protecting their business. This is a warning to all of us. A great many distractions and pleasures are available even to those who are not super-rich. Any of us can get caught up in self-interest and not be grieved for the destruction going on around us.

But some of Amos’s warnings are directed specifically at the super-rich. Amos 3:15 is directed at those with “winter houses” and “summer houses” and “houses of ivory”—those with a number of luxurious properties. In Amos, God exposes a system that is corrupt on every level. It exposes a false religion, flawed politics, corrupt judges, and an economic system content to use that corruption to make money.

The only solution, God says, is to tear it all down. Amos 6:7 says that “Therefore you will be among the first to go into exile; your feasting and lounging will end.” Our society, too, is on the brink of being torn down—unless we make major changes. There is no soundness in it anywhere.

But Amos also contains a picture of a new society about to be set up: “The days are coming, declares the Lord, when the reaper will be overtaken by the plowman and the planter by the one treading grapes. New wine will drip from the mountains and flow from all the hills.” (Amos 9:13) This future society will be fabulously wealthy. But unlike the wealth that came before, it is based not on extortion, but on obedience to God and His law.

The few verses at the end of Amos give us a different picture. This isn’t someone idly consumed in pleasure. While the book of Amos condemns those who get rich on the backs of others, ultimately it gives us a picture of the hard labor of the individual farmer bringing him bountiful rewards.

This is the only solution for us today: an entirely new society and system. In some ways, the super-rich are right to see the need for a change from the system as it is today. But it won’t come about by their doing. The book of Amos shows us that it will take God’s intervention in world affairs to set it up.

Obama’s Nonexistent Legacy

Flies love Bullshit

No one cares about former president Mullah Barack Hussein Obama anymore, least of all the Democratic Party’s most fashionable influencers. It’s almost as if his presidency never happened.

Last week, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.) said President Joe Biden’s first 100 days in office “have been impressive” and “exceeded” the expectations of trendy young progressives such as herself. Historians, journalists, and other liberals have anointed Biden the next FDR or LBJ—a once-in-a-generation “transformative” leader.

Not that long ago, it was Mullah Obama who was considered a hot young progressive and was hailed as the next coming of the 20th century’s most transformative leaders. The similarly fawning coverage of Biden, the former running mate whose presidential ambitions he repeatedly sought to discourage, must be utterly humiliating for Mullah Obama and his excessively large “narcissistic” ego.

Biden, meanwhile, just “loves the growing narrative that he’s bolder and bigger-thinking than Mullah Obama,” according to the short-form gossip blog Axios. And why shouldn’t he? As New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd argued, the former vice president was often treated horribly by Mullah Obama and his loyal cadre of insufferable bros, who considered dropping Biden in favor of Hillary Clinton ahead of the 2012 election. Politico wrote in 2014 that, among other things, Biden resented being “managed into a box by Mullah Obama’s cocky campaign team.”

In eight years, the Obama’s never invited Biden and his wife, Dr. Jill (Ed.D.), to the White House living quarters. The former First Couple, millionaires many times over, didn’t contribute a single dollar to Biden’s presidential campaign last year. That shouldn’t come as a shock, given the lengths to which Obama reportedly went to stop Biden from running for president—first in 2016 and again in 2020.

“It had stung Biden badly in 2015 when Mullah Obama made clear his preference for Hillary Clinton,” journalists Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes wrote in Lucky: “How Joe Biden Barely Won the Presidency.” Adding insult to injury, Obama’s advisers told Biden aides back then that they didn’t think he could beat Clinton. “They pressured him to get out of the way.”

Biden was especially insulted because he thought, correctly, that Hillary was a “terrible candidate” who would be easy to beat. Hillary’s devastating loss to Donald Trump did little to change Mullah Obama’s mind about 2020. He continued to worry that Biden would “embarrass” or “dishonor” himself on the campaign trail and urged him not to run, telling his former running mate, “You don’t have to do this, Joe.”

Behind Biden’s back, Obama reportedly told Democrats that the former VP “really doesn’t have it” and warned them not to “underestimate Joe’s ability to fuck things up.” Being the political genius that he thought he was, Mullah Obama and his closest advisers “seemed to be enamored with” Beto O’Rourke, the failed Senate candidate whose disastrous presidential campaign flamed out months before the Iowa caucuses.

Nevertheless, Biden was one of the only candidates who stood up for Mullah Obama during the Democratic primary. Obama’s name was rarely mentioned during the Democratic debates, and most of the candidates implicitly attacked his record on a host of issues, including health care, immigration, and trade.

That dynamic has largely persisted since Biden took office, with Democrats such as Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) retroactively bashing the “small” and “measly” stimulus package Mullah Obama championed in 2009 while touting the “big things” Democrats planned to accomplished under Biden.

No one cares about Mullah Obama anymore. His legacy is “nonexistent.” It’s as if his presidency “never happened”, doomed to be “overshadowed” by the transformative “leadership” of the former running mate he “despised.”

Mullah Barack Hussein Obama

Tough, but well deserved break, Mullah Barack Hussein Obama.

The video below is one more reason “buffoon” Mullah Barack Hussein Obama will never ever have a legacy.

Obama’s Zero Legacy

The Fraud-In-Chief

It was fortunate for Biden that there were “thousands of troops” at the capitol for his swearing-in ceremony. If they had not been there it would have been a starkly “empty” sight.

Similar to his campaign appearances, few people showed up. That’s because “China Joe” is not popular with Americans regardless of party affiliation.

“Sniffy” Joe’s campaign trail mostly took place in his own basement. He knew the election would be rigged in his favor, so he didn’t have to expend an inordinate amount of energy on winning the hearts of voters.

The Swamp will now retain power permanently and try to drain us. We can’t vote them out because our voting system has been compromised. There’s no sense in voting for Trump’s “Patriot Party” until we get rid of the mail-in ballot abuse as well as the computer voting. We need to stick to paper ballots and voter ID at polling stations.

Regardless, we now have to deal with a very “corrupt” Biden who is already undoing all the good Trump accomplished.

The lying corporate media are “gushing” over Biden and his cabinet picks. Many Democrats such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Michael Moore are eager to pursue a purge of Trump’s followers. They want strip us of our jobs, our remaining freedoms, and send us to reeducation camps. That’s what communists do. They love sending their enemies to gulags.

Look for “Bogus” Joe Biden and his party of totalitarianism to continue their compromise of conservative free speech. There will also be false flags leading to gun confiscation. He will push for mandatory vaccination. It’s not a pleasant situation.

Conservatives can’t depend on politicians, the military, or the courts to help us. If we are to restore the Republic then we must first stop hoping that someone else will save it for us. To even have a chance we must first stick together and save ourselves. We are the patriots in charge.

Ben Garrison

Employee of the Month

Goya Employee of the Month.

It’s always nice to see Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez lend businesses a helping hand.

This summer, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said calling her “AOC” is “disrespectful” but now you can buy many of her “AOC” shirts for $65/each.

She called for a “boycott” of Goya Foods after CEO Robert Unanue spoke publicly of his support for President Donald Trump.

“Oh look, it’s the sound of me googling how to make your own Adobo.” https://t.co/YOScAcyAnC — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) July 10, 2020

Make sure you always write out her full name, “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez” (AOC) when she sends follow-up tweets to her ambitious followers with a recipe:

While AOC’s tweet successfully prompted a #BoycottGoya, it also drove up Goya’s sales. By a lot. Check out this swing and a miss:

“She was actually our Employee of the Month. When she boycotted us, our sales actually increased 1,000%. We never were able to hand it to her, but she got Employee of the Month for bringing attention to GOYA and our adobo. Actually, our sales of adobo did very well after she said, ‘Make your own adobo.’ She’s our hero. She helped boost sales tremendously,” Goya Foods CEO Robert Unanue reported.

Recently, Goya doubled its production, constructing an $80 million facility in Texas to meet increased demand.

This is the equivalent of a popular Twitter account quote-tweeting a video that the user hates and inadvertently driving up the view count, making the host more famous and rich.

Movie theaters, the tanking NBA, and all the businesses the Democrats have shut down that are still offering take-out now hope that AOC will denounce their brands, too.

Get AOC’s “economic justice” sweatshirt now before it’s sold out.

Vicious Billionaires

The glorious “Barmaid” and erudite “socialist” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, aka “Bug-eyed Evita” recently, and repeatedly, “demonized” successful business owners in an interview literally arguing that business owners were “lazy slave owners” who profit off the backs of minorities who are “dying” because the business owners are successful.

“Bug-eyed Evita” made the extreme remarks when she was asked why successful business owners were “the enemy of health care.”

Parroting Barack Obama’s line she said “Well, you didn’t make those widgets, did you? Because you employed thousands of people and paid them less than a living wage to make those widgets for you. You didn’t make those widgets.”

“You sat on a couch while thousands of people were paid modern day slave wages, and in some cases real slave, real modern-day slavery, uh, depending on where you are in terms of food production,” Ocasio-Cortez claimed. “You made that money off the backs of undocumented people. You made that money off the backs of black and brown people being paid under a living wage.”

“You made that money off the backs of single mothers and all these people who are literally dying because they can’t afford to live and so no one ever makes a billion dollars. You take a billion dollars and all of that to say, is that it’s, and I’m not here to villainize and to say that billionaires are inherently morally corrupt, but they are, I mean, I think there is a case, but um, but, it’s not to say that, it’s to say that this system that we live in, life in capitalism, always ends in billionaires. If you don’t do it, someone else will. It’s who decides to make that choice is just kind of up to, you know, circumstance,” Ocasio-Cortez added.

“AOC on why successful businessmen don’t deserve their wealth: You didn’t make those widgets! You sat on a couch while thousands of people were paid modern day slave wages, and in some cases real modern-day slavery; you made that money off the backs of undocumented people. pic.twitter.com/Y2w3nSfezo — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) January 20, 2020

“Bug-eyed Evita” has a history of making “wild and largely unsubstantiated claims” claiming last year that being a billionaire is “immoral” and suggested that the “world was going to end in 12 years” if her radical socialist agenda was not adopted.

“.@AOC on Millennial’s and social media: We’re, like, the world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change. pic.twitter.com/HjhbVyfFN4 — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) January 22, 2019

“I think the part of it that is generational is that Millennial’s and people, in Gen Z, and all these folks that come after us are looking up and we’re like, the world is gonna end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change. And your biggest issue, your biggest issue is how are going to pay for it? — and like this is the war, this is our World War III” Ocasio-Cortez said without evidence.

“Bug-eyed Evita” also said that government should “dictate” how well people are able to live by “limiting” the success of those who are “hard working and successful.” She assured the interviewer that her statements were a sincere warning to the people and not at all intended as any kind of threat to billionaires as she humbly explained “I don’t want your money as much as I want your power.”

“Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY): Government should determine how well people live. Wants moral technology. People striving to be highly successful is bad. A world that allows billionaires is immoral.” pic.twitter.com/RyycflBQLa — Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) January 22, 2019

“Do we live in a moral world that allows for billionaires?” leftist Ta-Nehisi Coates asked. “Is that a moral outcome in and of itself?” “No, it’s not,” Ocasio-Cortez responded. “It’s not.”

At another time “Bug-eyed Evita” revealed:

“Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) suggests that the U.S. needs to pay reparations like Germany did after the Holocaust if it wants to heal. Until America tells the truth about itself, we are not going to heal.” pic.twitter.com/NlFWwtFH4u — Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) January 22, 2019

While her revelation was meant to be a dire warning that “life in capitalism always ends in billionaires,” others fascists inexplicably took it as advice on how to become one.

For example, Coughlin Berry, after streaming the “Bug-eyed Evita’s” interview, ran out to IKEA to finally buy the faux-leather couch he always wanted. Berry stated he really could not afford the couch but since it would make him a billionaire, he looked at the purchase as an investment. However, Berry’s first attempt to take a billion dollars had not concluded as he had hoped.

Berry had lured some “black and brown people, some undocumented, and some single mothers” to his apartment under the pretext of “watching some television” but instead of taking any money from them, they drank all of his “orange soda and wouldn’t even chip in for the pizza and chicken wings” they badgered him into ordering.

Another fascist who “misconstrue” her dire warning was Devlin Hunter. Hunter was more “frugal” and instead of purchasing a new couch, he simply borrowed one from his mother’s basement. However, since Hunter’s mother would not allow him to invite any “black or brown people, any undocumented, or any single mothers” to the house, Hunter planned to do the next best thing and take the couch to them.

Thus, Hunter, took the couch to the corner of Martin Luther King Blvd. and 5th Street in his hometown, where he was certain he would encounter many “black and brown people, many undocumented and many single mothers.” However, like Berry, Hunter’s first attempt at taking a billion dollars was also unsuccessful. While Hunter was using the “bathroom” facilities at the Burger King down the street, someone “stole” his couch.

A different reaction was offered by Raheem Santiago who said “My whole house is filled with black and brown people, and single mothers. We always sittin’ on the couch. How come we ain’t billionaires?” 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has lashed out at Republicans because the $2 trillion coronavirus stimulus bill does not include direct payments to taxpayers without a Social Security number, including people living in the U.S. illegally. 

AOC’s dire warning about billionaires
AOC to Billionaires: “You Sat on a Couch while Thousands of People were Paid Modern Day Slave Wages”
AOC Demonizes Business Owners: They’re Lazy Slave Owners, Employees ‘Literally Dying’