Archive for September 2, 2021

Saint Greta Thunberg

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on September 2, 2021 by andelino

“God has raised up a prophet in Greta Thunberg in a way that no one could predict.” That’s the verdict of the former head of the Anglican Church, Rowan Williams. “She has said things no one else could have said. Thank God for her!” he continued.

His comments came at an ecumenical festival in Norway last week. There, in Scandinavia, many religious leaders have hailed her with similar language. In 2019, the head of the protestant Church of Sweden, Antje Jackelén, said, “I believe she is actually prophetic in the same way that the Old Testament prophets were persistent with their message.”

A deaconess in the Uniting Church in Sweden wrote in an article for the Christian newspaper Kyrkans Tidning, “We want to claim that Sweden has a prophet who is active—right now. Her name is Greta Thunberg and she is fully comparable to the prophets of the Bible.” A local branch of the Church of Sweden even tweeted: “Announcement! Jesus of Nazareth has now appointed one of His successors, Greta Thunberg.”

Discussing Greta isn’t the only time the climate change movement resorts to religious language. Last month, the Hill warned: “Climate Change Is Really Apocalypse Now.”

“With raging wildfires, floods and pandemics, it seems like end times and it’s our own  fault,” read the quip. The author warned that all the plagues and prophecies of the book of Revelation are about to descend on Earth.

“What if the heat of the world, the fires in the Amazon, Australia, the Arctic fires, the changing of the Gulf Stream were the incipient stages of a wholly different order?” the author asked. “The beginning phase of a wholly changed planet. Maybe the true meaning of the apocalypse as it was used in the New Testament meant a revelation, a revelation about an entirely novel geologic era of being, a wholly man-made epoch, with no need for a godhead, the Anthropocene, forged by far too many greedy, consuming humans.”

This apocalyptic language has only worsened since the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change unveiled its report. “If we do not halt our emissions soon, our future climate could well become some kind of hell on Earth,” said Prof. Tim Palmer at the University of Oxford. The solution? “Immediate repentance,” according to the Guardian. But not repentance toward God, instead it must come “in the form of immediate and deep emissions cuts.” One journalist called the fires “very apocalyptic.”

Maybe this is the inevitable result of language inflation. The polar ice cap was supposed to disappear by 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. We had only 50 days to save the climate in 2009, and 500 days to save it in 2014. Britain is supposed to be “Siberian” by now, due to climate change. Snow is also supposed to be so rare that British children have no idea what it is, also due to climate change. If you constantly predict catastrophe, people get used to it. So with each failed prediction, they must resort to new language that gets more and more extreme.

But there is a much more serious problem here. Despite all the failed predictions, there is something wrong with the weather. Wildfires are burning around the Mediterranean. Dozens have been killed in Algeria, while scenes from Greece genuinely are apocalyptic. China’s streets have been turned to rivers, while buildings were washed away in Germany. Even Siberia is on fire.

People are right to sit up and take note. But climate “science” struggles to explain how all these varied catastrophes are caused by carbon dioxide emissions. Science is about making a prediction and comparing it with the evidence. Climate models predicted that Germany would receive less summer rainfall due to climate change—not more. Last year’s dry summer was blamed on climate change.

The Spectator noted, “If you want to try to blame last week’s floods on climate change it is first necessary to argue that the models have been wrong all along—and that actually Germany will suffer greater summer precipitation.” Pointing to every unusual event and claiming it’s climate change is not science.

Here’s a “theory” that most scientists would scoff at, but one that fits the data much better: An all-powerful God exists, He is concerned with what man does on Earth, and He uses the weather to get man’s attention.

The Bible makes a lot of specific forecasts. It’s not just less rain or a warmer planet—but a whole variety of curses, including disease pandemics, earthquakes, fires and floods. In fact, its forecasts emphasize the variety of curses. God says in Amos 4:7 “I also withheld rain from you when the harvest was still three months away. I sent rain on one town, but withheld it from another. One field had rain; another had none and dried up.” This is a prophecy about drought and floods hitting different places at the same time.

If we are truly being scientific, shouldn’t we accept the theory that best fits the evidence? The church of climate change is doing great damage by ignoring the Bible and instead pushing man’s ideas of what we should and should not be doing. God says, “The Lord is slow to anger but great in power; the Lord will not leave the guilty unpunished. His way is in the whirlwind and the storm, and clouds are the dust of his feet.” (Nahum 1:3). If a Christian leader really believes what the Bible says, how can he teach that Greta is a prophet and these weather disasters come from our climate sins, not from our much more serious moral sins?

The floods last month in Germany killed nearly 200 people. It was the worst natural disaster the country had seen since the North Sea floods in 1962. It got the nation’s attention. There was a real sense of a need to change. Germans knew this was not normal. But because of the church of climate change, many are convinced only of the need to change carbon emissions. They’re completely deceived on the cause of the crisis.

George Hunt became aware of the planned climate swindle and “industry” at the 1987 Fourth World Wilderness Conference in Colorado, which was then manifested at the 1992 UNCED Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in the form of Agenda 21. Until his death in 2013, he dedicated his life to the uncovering of this giant swindle, by means of which the entire human race is to be enslaved in a communist ecological dictatorship under the United Nations. He exposes the real ideas behind the World Conservation BANK and the protagonists behind this gigantic fraud against humanity and civilization. The former Agenda 21 is now called Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development.

There’s another terrible side effect to this approach. The Hill described the etymology of the word “apocalypse,” writing, “Apo, meaning to take away, and kalypto, meaning to cover or to hide. So really we are lifting the veil of illusion or untruth. The Earth is forcing us to lift the veil of illusion from our eyes. Pray that humanity listens.”

That’s not what the Bible’s “apocalypse” is about. “The word actually means an uncovering or disclosure, to enlighten or give light! Revelation should reveal light to men.”

Pointing people to the apocalypse of the Bible gives a warning, but it is also full of light and hope. Changing the apocalypse to some kind of creation of man leaves us with only a bleak future.

“What the authorities of this world are saying about climate change destroys faith. It destroys our hope!” The church of climate changes covers the true cause of our weather curses. But it also hides the solutions, and the hope behind them. “God wants to give us every blessing imaginable, but first we must turn to Him in humble obedience.”

This is the major lesson that God wants to teach us in these weather disasters. That is why it is such a dangerous deception to remove God from the equation and blame all these problems on carbon emissions causing climate change.

Don’t allow your vision of these events to be clouded by those who preach from the church of climate change.

The Religion of Climatism

Code Red for Humanity

Posted in uncategorized with tags , , , , on September 2, 2021 by andelino

Mankind has “unequivocally caused” climate change, and the damage is “irreversible for centuries to millennia.” That is the conclusion of the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The report describes five climate futures of differing severities. The most extreme scenario predicts that by 2100, the global temperature will rise by 38 to 42 degrees Fahrenheit, making the Earth 30.2 percent wetter in general and making regional drought events four times likelier.

Saleemul Huq, director of the International Center for Climate Change and Development in Dhaka, remarked: “The new IPCC report is not a drill but the final warning that the bubble of empty promises is about to burst. It’s suicidal and economically irrational to keep procrastinating.”

United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres said: “The alarm bells are deafening, and the evidence is irrefutable: Greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel burning and deforestation are choking our planet and putting billions of people at immediate risk.”

The experts are telling us that our climate has changed, we are probably past the point of no return, and we must make radical changes now to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to save our planet. But the truth is, this is an attack against the United States and you.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been around since 1988 and has a long history of alarmist assertions. Spiked noted that the organization’s 2007 report claimed North African crop production would drop 50 percent by 2020, and that 80 percent of Himalayan glaciers would be gone by 2035, threatening water supplies in Asia.

The 2014 report included a worst-case scenario in which global temperatures would rise 41 degrees Fahrenheit by 2100. Researchers later admitted that this scenario had only an estimated 3 percent chance of occurring.

Meanwhile, climate scientists are now touting a new modeling system known as CMIP6 as producing the most accurate climate models ever, and the model is predicting more extreme outcomes. However, many scientists are questioning the accuracy of this new system, particularly its Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) setting.

Its setting is 41 degrees Fahrenheit, about 1 to 6 degrees higher than most climate models. This makes the model much more sensitive and helps it produce more cataclysmic outcomes of higher temperatures, increasing rainfall in some places, increasing drought in others, and ominously rising oceans.

Carbon Brief explained that scientists are investigating the rationale behind the high sensitivity setting, writing:

“A number of climate scientists have expressed skepticism of the high-end values, arguing that they are inconsistent with evidence from palaeoclimate records and other lines of evidence. The fact that a number of models available so far have a very high ECS means either future warming may be worse than we thought or a number of prominent climate models may be getting climate sensitivity wrong.”

Pseudo-scientific governmental models have been used to scare people before—and drive forward policies. The changed world we live in traces back, in no small degree, to supposedly scientific models predicting Covid-19 death rates far higher than the seasonal flu.

Governments around the world used this “scientific” rationale to shut down populations of billions of people. If scientists—especially government-associated scientists with an agenda—were wrong on the doomsday covid modeling, might they be wrong on the doomsday climate change modeling?

The efficacy of the models themselves is a secondary, however. The mainstream media is amplifying and accrediting doomsday scenarios. When the science behind it is incomplete at best and intentionally skewed at worst, why use such aggressive scare tactics?

The Climate Change Hoax is the worst political/ scientific scandal since generations. Our hopelessly compromised establishment cannot be allowed to get away with the Climate gate whitewash to establish a communist dictatorship under the United Nations. Stop Agenda 21/Agenda 2030. Reform or dissolve the UN.

It’s about power. Environmental regulation gives significantly more power to bureaucrats. The governments most in favor of confronting climate change are the socialist, Marxist-type. Climate change has become something like a religion for the radical left. They believe it as an article of faith regardless of the evidence. It is a tool they are using to increase their control.

The latest report of the less-than-accurate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is useful to elites who are pushing Americans into a socialist regime. This artificially created, unscientific threat is useful for undermining the remaining freedoms and biblical principles that some Americans still cling to. The second prong of this attack is the most insidious: Climate change is actually being used to undermine your faith in God!

The premise of man-made climate change is that flooding, droughts, forest fires and hurricanes are caused by pollutants produced by humans. Polluting God’s creation is wrong, and extreme weather events have increased over the past few years. But pollution is not the cause of these disasters. The cause is God. Many scriptures show that God controls the weather.

Here is another clear statement of God’s power over the weather and it explains why God uses it as He does: “He loads the clouds with moisture; he scatters his lightning through them. At his direction they swirl around over the face of the whole earth to do whatever he commands them. He brings the clouds to punish people, or to water his earth and show his love.” (Job 37:11-13)

The Bible teaches that God is love, and He hates to see us indulging in sin and thereby destroying ourselves. He uses weather, among other things to correct us for sinning against His law of love (Deuteronomy 28; Leviticus 26; Psalm 119; Amos 4:7-9; Romans 13:8-10; Galatians 5:14; James 2:8).

Extreme weather events are increasing, but the linear cause-effect relationship is not to our CO2 emissions but to our sins. The solution is not radical policies that push God even further out of the picture. The solution is true repentance toward God. We need faith in the Bible, not in the problematic ideology of climate change progressivism.

God causes these conditions as punishment for pushing Him out of our lives. He is trying to get people to return to Him! This prophecy should help us see the connection between extreme weather upsets and human sin. Certainly we must pray, but we must also return to God! Returning to God requires real, tangible action.

Where do you want to put your faith? In a report of men or in the God of the Bible? The Bible says that weather disasters will continue to get worse in the future. But you can take real, tangible action and have faith in God.

%d bloggers like this: