Black Lives Don’t Matter

“Black Lives Matter” was founded in the aftermath of the 2014 Ferguson, Missouri police killing of an 18-year-old black American named Michael Brown. Before the investigation of the fatal incident had barely begun, Al Sharpton, one of President Obama’s most trusted advisers on race, rushed to Ferguson, where he helped spread an “unconfirmed” rumor that Brown was killed with “his hands in the air” while trying to surrender to the police officer who shot him.

With all due respect the Black Lives Matter’s signature chant “hands up, don’t shoot” is political propaganda of the most “poisonous” kind.  As a matter of fact:

  • Multiple witnesses deemed to be credible saw the killing in real time.
  • Of that group, none was white; all were black.
  • A lone witness testified that Brown had his hands up and was trying to surrender when Officer Darren Wilson shot him. 
  • That witness was Dorian Johnson, who was with Brown when Brown stole cigarillos from a convenience store shortly before he was killed. 
  • Johnson’s testimony was deemed not to be credible by both the grand jury and the U.S. Department of Justice.
  • Multiple other black witnesses, all of whom were deemed credible by the investigating authorities, testified that Michael Brown (1) charged Officer Wilson after refusing to obey Wilson’s commands and (2) reached inside Wilson’s patrol car and fought with Wilson for control of Wilson’s service revolver.  
  • Brown was shot and killed during that altercation.
  • Wilson was fully exonerated by the grand jury and the Obama Department of Justice.

Black Lives Matter was founded on a “lie.” I do not say that to be inflammatory, I say it because it’s true. “Hands up, don’t shoot” never happened. Yet the chant is still being promoted by the group as a rallying cry that heightens “racial hatred” of the police, and of America itself, which BLM labels as an “incurably racist nation” where things can be made right only by upending the whole system and starting over.

Black Lives Matter is a “violent” group whose members are believed to have played an instrumental role in the nationwide “rioting and looting” following George Floyd’s murder. The video below shows an elderly black woman confronting BLM rioters who “destroyed” her small store in New York City.

Americans on both sides of the aisle are deeply “troubled” over the dead of George Floyd. From coast to coast and border to border, protesters eagerly took part in a national expression of “outrage” over this travesty.

They genuinely care about black lives, as do all decent Americans. When caring Americans see an outrage against the black American community, they speak out, because black lives do matter…in most places.

I wonder if the multitude of “peaceful” people who protested George Floyd’s dead have ever given even a passing thought to speaking out about the one place where black lives don’t matter: “the inner city slums.”

In 2014, Milwaukee’s police chief at the time described in heart-wrenching terms the unmitigated “hell” that intrudes on the daily existence of “disadvantaged” minorities who fear being mowed down by their “own kind” in America’s urban ghettos.

Here are highlights of what Chief Flynn said:

  • The greatest racial disparity in Milwaukee is getting shot and killed.
  • Eighty percent of Milwaukee’s homicide victims are black Americans.

Milwaukee and every other big blue city in America have been marked by a decades-long murder “merry-go-round” that has nothing to do with the police. The overwhelming majority of the murdered — and the murderers — in America’s cities are “young black men” who were cheated out of a decent “education” by the inexcusably substandard Democrat-run public schools they had no choice but to attend.

Because many were functionally “illiterate” and afflicted with arrested psychological development, they lacked the “skills” to hold down even the most basic entry-level job.  So what did these “frustrated and angry” young men do?  Most turned to a life of “drugs, crime and violence” with many ending up “dead or in prison” before reaching their 20th birthdays.

For generations on end, “black-on-black” homicides in Democrat-run cities have been an ongoing “calamity” for the black community.  On May 31, Chicago experienced a record 18 homicides in a single day. Year to date, the city has chalked up 264 murders, with young black men a solid majority of the victims, which raises the question: “are those black lives any less important than George Floyd’s, any less deserving of our outrage?”

Chicago is the poster child for urban “carnage”, but every big blue city in America has overseen a breeding ground for “black-on-black” havoc, and they’ve done it for the last half-century.

“Silence is consent,” meaning that due to America’s deplorable history of slavery and segregation, decent people have a moral duty to speak out when a racial travesty occurs. Decent people who remain silent about the massive number of “black-on-black” homicides in America’s largest Democrat-run cities are effectively consenting to a continuance of the “urban carnage” that’s rolled on like an out-of-control freight train for more than 50 years.

Finally, by their own callous neglect of the most vulnerable people in our society, Democrats have shown they don’t give a flip about the black underclass, except at “election” time.

Chicago activists and ex-offenders Paul McKinley, Mark Carter, Joseph Watkins and Harold “Noonie” Ward recently went on the record to deliver a message to black communities across the country.


Why did the death of Minneapolis resident George Floyd in police custody arouse a “national wave of revulsion?” There are two vectors to this wave: “The humiliation of American blacks and the horror of white liberals.”

If police are restrained, or even “de-funded” as Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez demands, the “crime rate” will rise sharply, and blacks are far more likely to be victims than whites. Why black Americans should want to undermine the police forces that protect them is a sensitive question that has a simple answer: “The price of such police protection is humiliation.”

The sort of policing that keeps “criminals” off the streets through filters such as “frisking” large numbers of people and “stopping” cars with broken tail lights also subjects large numbers of “innocent” people to humiliating examination and occasional mistreatment.

Most people would rather be “dead than humiliated” and black Americans are no exception.

A black American is a thousand times more likely to be “killed” by another black American than by a police officer, as the estimable Heather MacDonald explained in The Wall Street Journal.

To be precise, American police (white or black) killed exactly nine unarmed black Americans in 2019. Whether these shootings were “justified” is a different issue. That is about one one-thousandth of the 7,407 blacks murdered in 2018 (last year for which data are available), about 90% of whom were killed by other black Americans.

As MacDonald observed, “The police fatally shot nine unarmed blacks and 19 unarmed whites in 2019, according to a Washington Post database, down from 38 and 32, respectively, in 2015. The Post defines ‘unarmed’ broadly to include such cases as a suspect in Newark, New Jersey, who had a loaded handgun in his car during a police chase.  In 2018 there were 7,407 black homicide victims. Assuming a comparable number of victims last year, those nine unarmed black victims of police shootings represent 0.1% of all African-Americans killed in 2019. By contrast, a police officer is 18½ times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male is to be killed by a police officer.”

If the present wave of protests succeeds in “hamstringing” American police departments, many more “black” Americans will die. That is what transpired in Baltimore after the 2015 riots following the death of Freddie Gray, who died in the back of a police van after his arrest for possession of a knife. Several days of “looting, rioting and burning” ended with the arrival of the National Guard.

“From 2008 to 2014, there were between a hundred and ninety-seven and two hundred and forty homicides each year in Baltimore; since Freddie Gray’s killing, there have never been fewer than three hundred,” Benjamin Wallace-Wells lamented in the New Yorker May 29. “The city’s mayor at the time – a quiet, serious-minded black woman named Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, who had been seen as a rising star in the Democratic Party – eventually chose not to seek re-election.”

That was no surprise, considering that the Baltimore city government charged six police officers with murder and manslaughter, and mainly “black juries” acquitted them.

The Baltimore police “stopped” doing what police forces do when attempting to contain a large “criminal” population, that is, to “roust” anyone who looks like he might be up to no good. Blacks comprise 13% of the US population, but committed 53% of homicides in which the perpetrator was known in 2018, as well as 60% of robberies.

A third of the US prison population is black, although the proportion has fallen somewhat in the past decade. That is effective policing, and it has led to a steady “decline” in the rate of violent crime in America during the past thirty years, although it sometimes leads to misadventure as in the case of Freddie Gray, as well as rare but outrageous acts of police violence in the case of George Floyd.

Below is a graphic from the Pew Institute illustrating the striking success of American police methods.

In keeping with the fall in the incidence of violent crime, the “incarceration rate” for blacks has fallen steadily, from a total of 592,900 prisoners in 2007 to 475,900 in 2017. As the Pew Institute reports, the black incarceration rate has fallen “faster” than the white incarceration rate. Policing has been one of America’s great success stories, and blacks have “benefited” from it more than whites.

Why, then, do black communities view police with such “hostility?” The fact that the increased safety of black communities depends upon measures imposed from the outside by a largely white state power is “humiliating.” It comes on top of other humiliations, of which the most onerous is the fake promise of “upward mobility through university education.”

Among white 18-year-olds, 42% will attend college versus 37% for blacks and 36% for Hispanics. The percentage of young blacks of college age who will attend university in the United States is not much different from that of whites. But under 34% of black males at US universities will graduate within six years (the standard program is four years). These are shocking numbers.

Of this 37%, only a third, or 12.5% of college-age black men, will obtain university degrees. Almost one-quarter of all black men of college age will try and fail. Those were the black youth who stayed out of trouble, graduated from high school, and sought advancement in the university system – but ended up at the bottom of the greasy pole. That is a “humiliation” on a gigantic scale.

Blacks to be accepted at colleges need Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT)scores 250 points lower than white candidates; Hispanics, 185 points lower. Asians must score 50 points higher than whites. A standard deviation is 210 points on the SAT, so the “handicapping” is enormous. That fiddle has equalized black and white college admissions, but not graduation rates.

Worst of all, the six-year graduate rate for black men stood at just 33.8% in 2016 (for 2010 university entrants), while the graduate rate for men of all other races and ethnicities rose over the past 25 years. Most impressive is the increase in the graduation rate of Hispanic men, which rose from just above 40% for university entrants in 1996 to over 50% for 2010 university entrants.

The drastic improvement in Hispanic graduate rates excludes the possibility that America has a problem with minorities as such. Hispanics are America’s largest minority group at 16.7% of the population, and their university graduation rate has improved steadily. This is a not a minority problem but a black problem, and specifically a problem for black men. The six-year graduation rate for black women is 43%.

For liberals who think that the problem is “racism”, and that black women are doubly oppressed by “misogyny as well as racism”, these facts pose a conundrum: “If racism somehow deters black men from succeeding in higher education, why doesn’t the combination of racism and misogyny deter black women even more?” 

A vicious “hoax” has been perpetrated on America’s young black men by the “liberal” establishment. University administrators are the most “liberal” collection of people in any American institution, private or public.

As Professor Samuel Abrams of Sarah Lawrence College reports, “Two-thirds of administrators self-identify as liberal, with 40 percent of that liberal pool stating that they are far left. A quarter of them call themselves middle of the road, while only 5 percent say they are on the right. That makes for a liberal-to-conservative ratio of 12 to one.”

The revolving door of minority admissions creates jobs and perquisites for college bureaucrats. US universities now spend almost as much on “administrative support” as they do on instruction, Caroline Simon wrote in Forbes.

“During the 1980-1981 school year, public and private institutions spent $20.7 billion in total on instruction, and $13 billion on academic support, student services and institutional support combined, according to data from the National Center for Educational Statistics. By the 2014-2015 school year, total instructional costs had climbed to $148 billion, while the same grouping of administrative expenses had risen to $122.3 billion,” wrote Simon.

The “leftists” who run the university system are happy to cover up their deception and incompetence by blaming “racism” for the low graduation rate of black men. A 2006 study in The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education commented, “High dropout rates appear to be primarily caused by inferior K-12 preparation and an absence of a family college tradition, conditions that apply to a very large percentage of today’s college-bound African Americans.”

As observed in a March 30 review-essay, mention of this 2006 analysis in a journal edited and written by blacks would be grounds for instant dismissal on grounds of racism at any major American university.

In the cited March 30 essay a sample of the academic studies bandied about to demonstrate that “systemic racism” rather than lack of preparation is responsible for the catastrophic failure rate of black men at American universities.

The inadequate “preparation” of young American blacks for higher education isn’t hard to explain. Black marriage rates are much lower than white or Hispanic marriage rates. Marriage rates are declining for all parts of the US population, but much faster for blacks.

In 1960, 90% of white women and 87% of black women aged 18-59 years had been married at some point in their lives; by 2016 the proportion had fallen to 60% for white women and just 33% for black women.

The US National Institute of Health wrote in 2015, “In 2014, 70 percent of non-Hispanic white children (ages 0–18) and roughly 59 percent of Hispanic children were living with both of their biological parents. The same was true for only a little more than one-third of black children.”

Sadly, black women account for 40% of all “abortions”, although they comprise only 12% of the female population. Black babies, that is, are more than three times as likely to be “killed” before birth than white babies.

Do Aborted Black Babies Matter? Watch Black Man “silence” woke Healthcare workers protesting for Black Lives Matter.

A death knell is tolling over black America. The high murder rate of “black victims” killed by “black perpetrators” is the most extreme expression of the self-destructive “impulses” that undermine black families. Self-destruction through violence,  a form of what Emil Durkheim called “anomic suicide” horrifies white liberals. They do not have to send to ask for whom the bell tolls, for it tolls for them, too.

The long “humiliation” of black men has “incubated” a terrible rage. The phony “promise” of upward mobility leaves them feeling “cheated”, with good reason. This “rage” has metastasized into a dominant “trope” in black popular culture. Rapper Jay-Z, an intimate of the Obama’s and a regular at the Obama White House, put it this way in “Dirt off Your Shoulder”:

I probably owe it to y’all, proud to be locked by the force
Tryin to hustle some things, that go with the Porsche
Feelin no remorse, feelin like my hand was forced
Middle finger to the law, nigga grip’n my balls…

For white liberals, “a black identity shaped by rage is not only to be condoned, but celebrated.” All politics is identity politics to liberals, because the whole object of their existence is to invent one’s identity according to therapeutic needs. That is why the progressive movement took up the cause of transgender rights with such passion: “To change one’s gender is the ultimate expression of self-invention in defiance of nature and tradition.”

The possessors of these newly-invented pseudo-selves know that they are imposters, and that everyone is laughing at them behind their backs. As Mephisto told Faust, “Wear a wig with a million hairs, and stand in heels as long as your elbow, and you still remain what you are.” 

The self-inventors hoped to escape the intolerable anxiety of existence by creating an identity out of thin air. But it is a hopeless enterprise; only true psychotics have the concentration to create their own identity. The rest of the self-inventors live in dread of the day when they will be found out for frauds. Life presents endless occasions for humiliation.

Among all the identities that modern “liberalism” has constructed, black identity is the first and most practiced: “In place of the Christian culture that made black churches the bearers of the civil rights movement, black identity politics has constructed a culture of rage and rejection.”

In 1993 the Reverend Calvin Butts, pastor of Harlem’s Abyssinian Baptist Church and the most distinguished black pastor in New York, drove a bulldozer up to the headquarters of Sony Music and crushed a pile of “rap CD’s” to protest their effect on black youth. More recently, black president Barack Obama hosted an “obscenity-spewing” rapper multiple times at the White House.

That, I believe, explains the dire position of young black men in America. “The humiliation of black men and their enraged, self-destructive response horrifies white liberals, for whom the sorrows of black America are not merely a social problem, but an identity crisis.” 

Illustrating Chicago Values
Race Isn’t Going Away
America’s New Caste System
Devolution to Revolution
Do Black Lives Matter?
BLM’s agenda

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: