Democratic Primary

Whatever Happened to the Democratic Primary?
By Matthew Continetti

The Fox News website highlights “hot topics” at the top of the page. As I write, the topics are: “Kobe Bryant dead,” “Trump impeachment,” and “Coronavirus.” Compelling—and in the last case terrifying—stories. But something is missing: the “Democratic Primary.” 

The Iowa “caucus” will be held in a matter of days. New Hampshire votes a week after that. Twelve Democrats are still in the race. Nobody cares.

Maybe that’s harsh. No doubt the candidates’ “mothers” are paying attention. Yet in two decades of serious observation of politics I have not seen a presidential “primary” that exerts less of a hold on the nation’s “attention” than this one. Why?

The obvious answer is “impeachment.” It is all Washington cares about. The trial of President Trump hasn’t just overshadowed the campaign. “It’s stopped it.” Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Amy Klobuchar, who are in the game in Iowa, as well as Michael Bennet, who is not, have been “strapped” to their chairs. Think of all the “Selfies” Warren has missed out on. She must be “despondent.”

Because the television camera in the Senate chamber is pointed at the “rostrum”, Warren and Sanders can’t even communicate to their supporters through “hand gestures.” Nor have Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg capitalized on the opportunity of having Iowa to “themselves.” They can’t break through “wall-to-wall” coverage of senators’ questions and “legal” maneuvers, of John Bolton’s “book”, of Mitch McConnell’s quest to end the “trial” as soon as possible.

True, impeachment has kept Biden’s name in the news. But not in a way he would like. Trump’s defense has drawn further attention to Hunter Biden’s questionable “position” on the board of Ukrainian gas giant Burisma. What was Hunter being paid for? “Relationship advice?” His dad doesn’t have a good answer. Whether he likes it or not, impeachment “reinforces” the impression that Joe Biden is a lifelong D.C. politician whose family “benefits” from his connections.

Look at the numbers. Prior to Nancy Pelosi’s announcement of the impeachment inquiry on September 24, Biden was at 44 percent favorable, 49 percent unfavorable. Last week he was 41 percent favorable, 53 percent unfavorable. That isn’t progress.

President Trump’s “job approval” rating hasn’t budged. It was 45-52 in the Real Clear Politics average then and now. And Trump has improved in “head-to-head” mashups. In the late October ABC News / Washington Post poll, Biden held a 15-point advantage over Trump. As of last week’s poll, his lead had been cut to four points.

If Nancy Pelosi thought “impeachment” would help the Democratic front-runner, she was mistaken. That’s not strategy. It’s what Will Ferrell, portraying George W. Bush, once called “strategery.” Of course, Pelosi’s objective may have been simply to “insulate” herself from a left-wing “rebellion.”

Biden’s troubles suggest another reason for the “lack of excitement.” The candidates are weak and uninteresting. Biden is “barely” comprehensible. Buttigieg has all the “pizzazz” of a PowerPoint. Warren reminds you of your least “favorite” professor. Sanders and his “surrogate” successor Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez draw crowds. But so did the Jacobins. The democratic “socialists” are exciting, sure. They are also terrifying.

How can you tell the rest of the Democratic field is “uninspired?” Two billionaires have bought support through “supremacy” of the airwaves. It’s not Mike Bloomberg’s “personality” that has contributed to his rise. It’s his “checkbook.”

Worse than the “dullness” of the contestants is the “plodding” horse-race. Biden has “floated” above his rivals since the beginning. The one major change in the dynamic has been Warren’s “rise and fall.” The two exciting moments came when Kamala Harris “ambushed” Biden in the first debate and Tulsi Gabbard “sideswiped” Harris in the second. Months passed without any incident. The most recent controversy is whether Sanders told Warren a “woman” can’t be president. Surely they can do better than that.

Sanders “victories” in Iowa and New Hampshire would liven things up. For a while until Obama “speaks” up. The fundamental problem is the Democratic primary is a “sideshow.”

For four-and-a-half years the “main event” in American politics has been Donald Trump. Policy isn’t the issue. He is the issue. Everything revolves around him. “Our political solar system, in short, has been characterized not by two equally competing suns,” wrote the political scientist Samuel Lubell, “but by a sun and a moon. It is within the majority party that the issues of any particular period are fought out; while the minority party shines in reflected radiance of the heat thus generated.”

The “party system” Lubell described no longer exists. The parties are “shells.” The incumbent has changed parties “five” times. He settled on the GOP four years before “winning” the presidency. Bernie Sanders is running for the nomination of a party he has “never joined and doesn’t trust.”

What matters today are individual “brands.” And no brand is more “prominent,” more “polarizing,” more “overpowering” than “Donald J. Trump’s.”


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: