Run Away Prince

Meghan Markle’s “soy boy” husband is running “away from home” with her to an uncertain “future” as an abused, cuckolded, gas lit “house-husband” to North America.

“The Run Away Prince formerly known as Duke of Sussex” has given up the only thing he is “known” for and has no “identifiable” job skills. Meghan, in the meantime has returned to 8-month old “Archie” they left behind in Canada.

Archie had to be left with a Nanny as it was “inconvenient” for a person with such difficult royal “living” circumstances to also be “responsible” for the baby. The royal child will be more “useful” later during the divorce and headline drama in “punishing” the royals.

Poor Harry hasn’t even seen the worst of his “psycho” wife yet. He will when she “dumps” him running for Congress. Another artist formerly known as “Prince” also never knew exactly “who he was” and now his sovereignty is “putty” in the hands of incoming “American Meghan.”

Meghan Markle is the quintessential empowered “progressive” woman. She not only cares, but she “tirelessly” travels the world raising “awareness” of how much she cares about all the issues that matter. Like every “empowered” progressive woman, she has the uncanny “ability” to make an issue out of anything and everything. She’s a strong woman of “independent” thought if not means, who knows exactly what she “wants and doesn’t hesitate to go after it by “any means” necessary.

Since her “marriage” to Prince Harry, and with her Hollywood celebrity credentials lending her the necessary gravitas, Meghan has become a “beacon of hope” and “empowerment” to women everywhere, and an “agent of change” to an antiquated, imperialist institution.

She is the one “America” has been waiting for! And even with all these qualities, the very fact that she “hates” Trump should be more than enough for any of us to welcome her back from royal “nightmare” living in London!

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have been in the “news cycle” for a couple of weeks. There’s nothing that the “fake news” media loves more, besides “impeachment” than a good “Royal Family Feud” with or without Richard Dawson.

Meghan has big plans for her “Royal Run Away” which includes moving to Canada, at least until Donald Trump is “out of office.”

The Queen was displeased with the “antics” and watching her grandson become more and more “emasculated” by the day at the hands of Meghan. Her majesty kept a “stiff upper lip” and wished them well as the couple decided to “ditch” the public funded Royal life for a more “independent” existence, stepping down as “Junior Royal”.

The Queen knows what’s going on. She is a “survivor” and will carry on through this princess’s tantrum. Harry however has made a “fool” of himself and his “manhood.”

There’s more to this than a young couple wanting a different life. Meghan and “Run Away Harry” are staying at the home of a billionaire friend of Bill Clinton while Meghan has dollar signs in her eyes and snakes in her heart. Harry is just clueless and is being lead around on a “leash” by his wife.

Good Soy Boy! Now roll over!

Poor Prince Harry. Rather than a dynastic crisis shaking the foundations of the British monarchy, the West’s oldest political institution, “Megxit” has played out as a therapeutic family intervention on behalf of a fragile, “prodigal” but much-loved younger son.

Queen Elizabeth II, the world’s most “admired” woman according to a Gallup poll, emerged from a family summit at “Sandringham Castle” with a benevolent response to her grandson’s flight from “royal responsibility” in tow to a calculating wife.

It is “Macbeth” redone as situation comedy, with Meghan Markle miscast as “Lady Macbeth” and a cameo appearance by Oprah Winfrey as lead “Witch.”

The Queen stated that she has had “constructive” talks with other senior royals on the future of “Run Away Harry” and Meghan and will allow the couple to spend time in Canada and the UK during a “period of transition.” The Queen said the Royal Family “respect and understand the pair’s desire for a new life,” although they would have preferred for them to remain “full-time working members.”

To British eyes, it seems natural that the 93-year-old Queen should help her “beloved” grandson Harry, who at age 12 walked behind his mother Princess Diana’s coffin in front of the nation. But the kindly “monarch” has also made a “Machiavellian” move. Despite the appearance of “royal” crisis, the monarchy is well protected. The queen has seized a “teachable” moment for the benefit of her future “heirs” Charles, William and George.

Succession and continuity are “paramount” in Royal circles. Britain is in good standing for succession with a line of future generational “successors” stretching a century into the future. Queen Elizabeth II nears the end of her reign, the embodiment of ancient tradition and the authority of enduring values. The crown remains while the “escapades” of errant family members such as “Diana, Margaret, Andrew and now Meghan” decay into yesterday’s gossip.

The final decisions on how the couple will organize their “time, titles and finances” and whether they can “abdicake and eat it too,” will be made in the coming months. Plans are already in the works with Disney boss Bob Iger.

UK opinion polls have largely “welcomed” their exit, so long as the British “taxpayers” are not implicated, although they cite Meghan as the cause. In place of the “witches’ prophecy,” this recasting of Shakespeare’s tragedy has the betting house “Ladbrokes” with overwhelming odds that Harry and Meghan will “divorce” in the next five years rather than “rejoin” the Royal Family. Bookmakers are giving odds of 3/1 for Harry and Meghan to get divorced by 2025, and 1/14 odds that the Sussexes will resume royal duties.

Harry and Meghan made the “mistake” of thinking that they mattered. Harry, although at one time Britain’s most popular Royal, is sixth in line to the throne and constitutionally “irrelevant.” They were a fairy tale couple, who first were embraced from their nuptials and beyond, as hugely popular and a welcomed asset in their royal duties. Contrary to reports of “racism or anti-American” sentiment, Harry and Meghan at first received some of the best “royal press” ever, leaving many to wonder how they let it “slip away.”

There was growing outrage after Meghan Markle’s half-brother begged Prince Harry to “cancel” the royal wedding, writing, “It’s not too late Harry.” Thomas Markle Jr. wrote a letter filled with spelling mistakes and grammatical errors. “Meghan Markle is obviously not the right woman for you,” he wrote. “This is the biggest mistake in royal wedding history.”

But it has since emerged that the “rules” of Royal engagement were never Meghan’s plan. Harry was her modern-day “power couple” puddle. Several sources reveal that Meghan months ago set up a “private” company in Delaware, managed by her former “Hollywood” management team. Her early November visit to New York to watch Serena Williams play in the “US Open” was a blind for private meetings on American soil with her “power brokers.”

She plotted the break at a subsequent six-week “sabbatical” with baby Archie at a Vancouver hideaway. Meghan maneuvered for the optimal “exit” deal with the help of a team of hard-knuckled damage limitation and divorce lawyers, assisted by a high-powered public relations firm, retained early in her marriage to manage her image and galvanize future commercial opportunities for her personal professional future.

Markle’s half-sister Samantha Markle and her childhood friend Ninaki Priddy both hinted that the “Duchess of Sussex” is a narcissist. Markle’s sister said that she was “a narcissist, a shallow, social climber.” Meanwhile, her friends described her in a way that supports the claims that she’s a narcissist. “Meghan was calculated, very calculated in the way she handled people and relationships. She is very strategic in the way she cultivates circles of friends. Once she decides you’re not part of her life, she can be very cold. It’s this shutdown mechanism she has,” Priddy said.

Meghan has one “Trump” card, so to speak, namely her passing usefulness to the progressive wing of US politics. Groomed and advised by the “Obama’s, Clinton’s, Clooney’s and Oprah” position her as “Fifth Columnist” for the US Democratic Party within the highest level of British society. The left-wing American media spin Meghan’s “narcissism” into a horrible example of “racism’ perpetrated by traditional institutions, and hope to make her into a “poster-girl” for the progressive narrative.

By contrast, the British public smells the mercenary social-climber behind the pretense of victimization. Meghan refused to attend the Buckingham Palace “reception” for President Donald Trump, a political gesture “incompatible” with the monarchy’s “above-politics” position. She invited only one family member to her “Windsor Palace” wedding, an expression of contempt for the “humble” origins which she now wants to flaunt at the supposedly “snooty” British Establishment.

But this is Harry’s drama, not Meghan’s. His American wife marginalized his old friends and army comrades. Isolated from his family and the military in which he served with distinction and enthusiasm, Harry was “miserable and confused.” He opened himself up to public scrutiny and “embarrassed” himself by preaching about climate change while traveling on private jets. His old friends have talked about the distancing of Harry from his family, military, friends and now country.

From Boy to Soy in 6 pictures!

All the while a clandestine PR team managed internally by former Hillary Clinton campaign aide Sarah Latham and externally by Hollywood power broker Ken Sunshine “spun a tale” about British hostility to the couple. They’re not fooling the British, who have responded with their usual good sense and “caustic” humor to this unwanted intrusion of “Tinseltown” spin. The liberal media in the United States meanwhile has lapped up the “Latham-Sunshine” story, with a tongue-clicking commentary in the New York Times about supposed British “racism.”

While Britain is “sad” that Harry, once one of the country’s most beloved Royals, begins his transition, this “debacle” now moves away from UK soil and becomes a much bigger “playground” for the couple in North America. Their goal is to control their own “media” narrative by taking advantage of the generational gap, building momentum with the under 30’s who view them more favorably.

The media, however, will continue to “examine” their every move. Every contract, documentary, relationship, cause or initiative they pursue will be subject to intensive “scrutiny” and become a potential minefield. Moving to North America, the couple will lose the “protection” of above-politics status and could “embrace” full-on the force of election-year carnage.

Shakespeare’s modern-day “tragedy” will unfold no doubt on Oprah’s next mental “health” special on Apple TV. The British expect that Harry will “regret” that he gave up friends, family, and the “dignity” of royal status for a life in Hollywood where, as Carrie Fisher said, “the three people closest to you are your therapist, your divorce lawyer and your personal trainer.”

The British Royal Farce
Meghan Markle refuses to move back to the States until Trump is gone
Prince Harry’s Royal Marines role could be in danger after not being seen for months
Meghan Markle Showing Shocking Signs That Confirm Narcissistic Behavior
The Windsor’s Blackmailed by their Daughter-in-Law

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: