Pencil Presidency

Obama's Pencil 01Obama’s Pencil-thin Presidency
By: Cindy Simpson

Peeking over the top of Obama’s shirt pocket is not the end of the pen that he “threatened” to use, along with his phone, if he didn’t get his way.

It’s the “tip” of a pencil.

An ordinary, wooden, No. 2 pencil, complete with “eraser,” both ends worn to the “nub,” in desperate need of “sharpening.”

Pens suggest “importance and permanence.” Great documents are “composed” with pens. Pivotal moments in history are “recorded” in ink, as are “inspiring” presidential legacies.

The references to the current president inserted into those biographies, however, are sketched in the “erasable strokes of a pencil,” as is everything else Obama has ever “produced” or that his “presidency” has inspired.

Pencils’ “output” is flexible.

Pencils design and transform and spin. Pencils redefine, divide, draw distractions and smudge and distort and erase: “facts, events, and narratives.”

Penciled opinions can conveniently evolve. Penciled statistics, measurements and books are “easily” cooked. “Red lines” marked by pencils can be erased and redrawn. Laws become mere “suggestions” and imply a “vast amount of discretion” in enforcement.

Pencil Presidency 06

Because Obama is a master of words — one with the ability to control their meaning — his pen, aided by a vast media complex, is a tool that holds the potential for absolute power as “executive, legislator and judge.”

A prominent law professor once aided Obama in that mastery with this explanation: “Obama didn’t say what he meant…and having said that, in order to avoid misleading anyone, he had to clarify it.”

Thomas Sowell put it a little clearer than Mr. Tribe when he observed about Obama: “One of the many ways of lying smoothly is to simply redefine words.”

Another is to redefine the presidency. Law professor Jonathan Turley described the “troubling mosaic of unilateral and unchecked executive power” drawn by such an “uber presidency.”

A pencil is the “requisite tool” for an “uber-president” focused on the “fundamental transformation” of America.

Pencils have been used by Obama and his like-minded supporters since the beginning of his political career. His image was sketched by fans on the “blank screen” he offered. His remarkably thin “résumé” was touted as “storybook;” his morphing history contained “composite” and conflicting events, characters and interesting birthplaces that the Democrat-media complex defended and extolled in “perfect” unison.

The media “never” acknowledged, much less looked for, the missing link in the evolution of Obama’s beliefs from “college radical and community organizer” to the supposed “pragmatic moderate” on the ballot.

Imagine how the media, much less the Republican party, would “react” if Sen. Rand Paul had written a book about himself titled “Dreams from my Father.”

Important personal and background information — “details that for most of us are written on our personal and professional résumés in indelible ink “— for Obama remain “sketchy, inconsistent, undisclosed or sealed.”

Pencil Presidency 04

And now the man with a largely “mysterious” past and a present that some describe as “aloof, disengaged, or cold-shouldered” reclines with his “feet resting on the most powerful desk” in the world, “toying” with both ends of a pencil.

It should come as no “surprise” to find that Obama feels free to “erase” the document that he once described as “deeply and fundamentally” flawed. Or that a man who writes a partly “fictional” book about himself (and supposedly all by himself) and accepts a Nobel Peace prize — “before having achieved anything ink-worthy” — would be reluctant to “revise” any of it when convenient.

Neither would he hesitate to “erase or redraw,” rather than execute the “laws” over which he presides.

Instead, the greatest mystery is why the very media complex pencils that prop up Obama would be surprised to discover that this administration is the greatest enemy of press freedom and a benchmark for a new level of secrecy and control.”

His “concentration of power” is also becoming the very danger our Constitution was designed to avoid,” according to Turley in his testimony before Congress.

The most “obvious” examples of Obama’s dangerous pencil in action are the “unlawful revisions to ObamaCare.”

Pencil Presidency 03

Although the “big fucking deal” of the ACA was ceremoniously signed into law with Obama’s twenty-two pens, — “apparently it was written in pencil” — since hundreds of its pages are already filled with “smudges and eraser crumbs.”

And that emphatic “period” at the end of Obama’s “repeated” insistence about “keeping our plans and doctors” was simply erased — “poof” — when revealed facts required that he “twirl” his pencil around to the other end.

Obama also uses his pencil to “recast” issues and events as “phony scandals.” The Democrat-media complex assists in the “artistry” and diverts attention with “phony” wars.

Their pencils never “scratch beyond the surface” of Obama administration scandals, and they fail to “connect the dots” to the crime in their own party. They draw lipstick on the massive “pig” of ObamaCare.

And a new circle of “IRS and regulatory hell” has been drawn by the administration for small businesses, tea partiers and other conservatives.

But still, neither the “legislative nor judicial branch” tries to wrest that pencil from Obama’s fingers — rather they often display teamwork in “word mastery” with pencils of their own. Perhaps the most troubling of “instances” was the presiding “opinion” composed by Chief Justice Roberts on the “constitutionality” of the ACA.

Some Democratic members of Congress actually have suggested the drafting of “executive orders” for Obama — “orders that bypass the constitutional function of their own offices” — undoubtedly composed in pencil, ready for Obama to sign in ink.

Pencil Presidency 05

Some Republicans still “hope,” with no apparent basis, that someday Obama might “walk in” with his pencil sharpened, ready to “lead and work” to cut spending. Instead, Obama uses it to add “zeroes” to the end of the massively “growing” debt.

Pencils may support “liberal” politics on the national scene, but suggest “unseriousness” to foreign powers who recognize when “red lines” are not drawn in ink. Foreign policy established by a “pencil-wielding” commander-in-chief is easy to “diss.”

Ultimately, Obama’s pencil may draw an unbearably light presidency, one that not only precariously resides between the two quotation marks described by Jonah Goldberg, but also produces a personal legacy “too shallow” to fill the halls of a presidential library.

Pencil Presidency 02

Our national “legacy”, however, may be forever “transformed” by the consequences of that pencil, as it severely impacts our “economy and national security” to a degree from which we may never recover.

It also “threatens” to forever “expand” our government and “recast” the role of the president.

Obama recently named the political opponents that “history” will not be “kind” to — however, our real concern should be over who will compose that history and control its content, and where it will lead us.

A famous “historian” is credited with frequently saying: “There is no such thing as truth, only a collection of narratives.”

Written in pencil, of course.

Pencil Presidency 07

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: